Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 726)
FC Twente stadium collapses, killing one and hospitalising 10

• Roy Huiskes’s Twitpic of the collapsed stadium • In pictures: The scenes at FC Twente today One person has died and a further 10 people are being treated in hospital after the roof of FC Twente’s De Grolsch Veste stadium collapsed. Three people were treated at the scene, said Peter den Oudsten, the mayor of the Dutch city of Enschede where the stadium is located. Den Oudsten said sniffer dogs and cameras were being used to check if anybody else was still trapped under the tangle of girders and red roof panels the colour of FC Twente’s shirts behind the goal at the southern end of the stadium. The roof is reported to have collapsed after two support beams buckled, although the reason why this happened is not yet known. The work was being carried out as part of the club’s development of their stadium to a 32,000-seat arena. The capacity was just 13,500 when the Enschede side moved to the venue in 1998. The stadium is situated on the outskirts of Enschede in the east of the Netherlands, close to the German border. FC Twente, who finished second in the Eredivisie last season and won the Dutch Cup, were until 2010 managed by the former England manager, Steve McClaren. The club’s chairman Joop Munsterman is thought to have left the team’s pre-season training camp in Zeeland and is returning to Enschede, while the coach, Co Adriaanse, has cancelled all press activity until further notice. FC Twente posted a statement on their official website which read: “During the renovation work at the Grolsch Veste the roof of the building collapsed. Our thoughts are with everyone involved.” FC Twente European football Netherlands James Callow guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
FC Twente stadium collapses, killing one and hospitalising 10

• Roy Huiskes’s Twitpic of the collapsed stadium • In pictures: The scenes at FC Twente today One person has died and a further 10 people are being treated in hospital after the roof of FC Twente’s De Grolsch Veste stadium collapsed. Three people were treated at the scene, said Peter den Oudsten, the mayor of the Dutch city of Enschede where the stadium is located. Den Oudsten said sniffer dogs and cameras were being used to check if anybody else was still trapped under the tangle of girders and red roof panels the colour of FC Twente’s shirts behind the goal at the southern end of the stadium. The roof is reported to have collapsed after two support beams buckled, although the reason why this happened is not yet known. The work was being carried out as part of the club’s development of their stadium to a 32,000-seat arena. The capacity was just 13,500 when the Enschede side moved to the venue in 1998. The stadium is situated on the outskirts of Enschede in the east of the Netherlands, close to the German border. FC Twente, who finished second in the Eredivisie last season and won the Dutch Cup, were until 2010 managed by the former England manager, Steve McClaren. The club’s chairman Joop Munsterman is thought to have left the team’s pre-season training camp in Zeeland and is returning to Enschede, while the coach, Co Adriaanse, has cancelled all press activity until further notice. FC Twente posted a statement on their official website which read: “During the renovation work at the Grolsch Veste the roof of the building collapsed. Our thoughts are with everyone involved.” FC Twente European football Netherlands James Callow guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Real IRA founder loses Omagh civil case appeal

Judges uphold ruling holding Michael McKevitt and fellow Real IRA member responsible for 1998 atrocity The Real IRA’s founder, Michael McKevitt, has lost his appeal against a historic civil case ruling that held him responsible for the Omagh bomb atrocity in 1998. The court of appeal in Northern Ireland upheld the 2009 ruling against McKevitt and fellow Real IRA figure Liam Campbell on Thursday. But in a mixed day for the Omagh victims’ families, the judge in the Belfast court directed a civil retrial of the claims against Colm Murphy, and Seamus Daly’s appeal has been allowed. The court will hear arguments for a retrial. In 2009, a judge found the men liable for the single biggest massacre of the Ulster Troubles, awarding £1.6m damages to some of the families’ victims. That decision opened the way for the victims of other terrorist atrocities in Ireland and overseas to consider taking civil legal action against armed groups responsible for their injuries or relatives’ deaths. Twenty-nine people and a pair of unborn twins were killed when the Real IRA car bomb exploded in the County Tyrone town in August 1998. Lawyers for the families had also appealed against the compensation awarded. They said it should have been more because of the scale of the outrage. The 12 relatives who took the 2009 case were told by the court that the £1.6m figure awarded to them would not be increased. No one has ever been convicted in a criminal court of causing the deaths of the Omagh victims. The only man to face criminal charges over the Omagh killings, Sean Hoey from Jonesborough in south Armagh, was acquitted in 2007. None of the men being sued has the capacity to make any kind of large-scale payment. From the start the families made clear the civil action was a vehicle for putting as much information as possible into the public domain about the bombing and the men they claim were involved. In his 2009 ruling, Mr Justice Morgan also found the dissident republican organisation the Real IRA liable for the bomb. He said it was clear that the bombers’ primary objective was to ensure that the bomb exploded without detection, and the safety of those members of the public in Omagh town centre was at best a secondary consideration. He said he was “satisfied that those involved in the planning, preparation, planting and detonation of the bomb recognised the likelihood of serious injury or death from its detonation but decided to take that risk”. McKevitt founded the Real IRA in November 1997 following a split within the Provisional IRA (PIRA) over the terms of Sinn Féin’s entry into party talks that led to the Good Friday agreement in 1998. He was at one time the PIRA’s quarter-master general – effectively the man in charge of their secret arsenal of weapons. McKevitt is also the brother-in-law of the IRA hunger striker Bobby Sands. His wife, Bernadette, Sands’s sister, has denounced the Sinn Féin peace strategy and claimed it was a betrayal of what her brother died for in the Maze prison in 1981. Real IRA Omagh bombing Northern Ireland UK security and terrorism IRA Henry McDonald guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Real IRA founder loses Omagh civil case appeal

Judges uphold ruling holding Michael McKevitt and fellow Real IRA member responsible for 1998 atrocity The Real IRA’s founder, Michael McKevitt, has lost his appeal against a historic civil case ruling that held him responsible for the Omagh bomb atrocity in 1998. The court of appeal in Northern Ireland upheld the 2009 ruling against McKevitt and fellow Real IRA figure Liam Campbell on Thursday. But in a mixed day for the Omagh victims’ families, the judge in the Belfast court directed a civil retrial of the claims against Colm Murphy, and Seamus Daly’s appeal has been allowed. The court will hear arguments for a retrial. In 2009, a judge found the men liable for the single biggest massacre of the Ulster Troubles, awarding £1.6m damages to some of the families’ victims. That decision opened the way for the victims of other terrorist atrocities in Ireland and overseas to consider taking civil legal action against armed groups responsible for their injuries or relatives’ deaths. Twenty-nine people and a pair of unborn twins were killed when the Real IRA car bomb exploded in the County Tyrone town in August 1998. Lawyers for the families had also appealed against the compensation awarded. They said it should have been more because of the scale of the outrage. The 12 relatives who took the 2009 case were told by the court that the £1.6m figure awarded to them would not be increased. No one has ever been convicted in a criminal court of causing the deaths of the Omagh victims. The only man to face criminal charges over the Omagh killings, Sean Hoey from Jonesborough in south Armagh, was acquitted in 2007. None of the men being sued has the capacity to make any kind of large-scale payment. From the start the families made clear the civil action was a vehicle for putting as much information as possible into the public domain about the bombing and the men they claim were involved. In his 2009 ruling, Mr Justice Morgan also found the dissident republican organisation the Real IRA liable for the bomb. He said it was clear that the bombers’ primary objective was to ensure that the bomb exploded without detection, and the safety of those members of the public in Omagh town centre was at best a secondary consideration. He said he was “satisfied that those involved in the planning, preparation, planting and detonation of the bomb recognised the likelihood of serious injury or death from its detonation but decided to take that risk”. McKevitt founded the Real IRA in November 1997 following a split within the Provisional IRA (PIRA) over the terms of Sinn Féin’s entry into party talks that led to the Good Friday agreement in 1998. He was at one time the PIRA’s quarter-master general – effectively the man in charge of their secret arsenal of weapons. McKevitt is also the brother-in-law of the IRA hunger striker Bobby Sands. His wife, Bernadette, Sands’s sister, has denounced the Sinn Féin peace strategy and claimed it was a betrayal of what her brother died for in the Maze prison in 1981. Real IRA Omagh bombing Northern Ireland UK security and terrorism IRA Henry McDonald guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Last-minute appeals in Texas as Mexican’s hour of execution nears

Humberto Leal due to die despite protests from lawyers, Mexican ambassador and the White House The planned execution on Thursday of a Mexican national in Texas has prompted a flurry of appeals on his behalf, including a rare plea from the White House, because of what it could mean for other foreigners arrested in the US and Americans detained in other countries. Humberto Leal, 38, is awaiting a ruling by the US supreme court on whether to block his lethal injection in Huntsville. He was sentenced to die for the 1994 rape and murder of 16-year-old Adria Sauceda. Leal’s lawyers contend that Texas authorities did not tell him after his arrest that he could seek legal assistance from the Mexican government under an international treaty, and that such assistance would have aided his defence. Leal moved to the US as a toddler. Leal’s lawyers have support from the White House, the Mexican government and other diplomats who believe the execution should be delayed so his case can be thoroughly reviewed. “There can be little doubt that if the government of Mexico had been allowed access to Mr Leal in a timely manner, he would not now be facing execution for a capital murder he did not commit,” Leal’s lawyers told the Texas board of pardons and paroles in a clemency request that was rejected on Tuesday. “Unfortunately, Mexico’s assistance came too late to affect the result of Mr Leal’s capital murder prosecution.” Barack Obama’s administration took the unusual step of intervening in a state murder case when it asked the supreme court last week to delay Leal’s execution for up to six months. The US solicitor general told the court that Congress needed time to consider legislation that would allow federal courts to review cases of condemned foreign nationals. The legislation, backed by the US state department and the UN, would bring the US into compliance with provisions in the Vienna convention on consular relations regarding the arrest of foreign nationals. Lower courts have already rejected the pleas, agreeing with the Texas attorney general’s office that the legislation does not apply because it has not been signed into law. At least two similar measures have already failed in Congress. “Leal’s argument is nothing but a transparent attempt to evade his impending punishment,” Stephen Hoffman, an assistant attorney general for the state of Texas, told the supreme court. Arturo Sarukhan, Mexico’s ambassador to the US, has written to congressional members and Texas officials calling attention to the case and urged the governor of Texas, Rick Perry, to stop the execution. Perry had the authority to issue a 30-day reprieve but made no decision while the courts remained involved. Prosecutors said that on the night Sauceda was killed, she was drunk and high on cocaine at an outdoor party in San Antonio and was assaulted by several males. Leal said he knew her parents and would take her home. Witnesses said Leal drove off with Sauceda around 5 am. Her body was found later that morning. Her head had been battered with a chunk of asphalt and there was evidence that she had been bitten, strangled and raped. Leal, a mechanic, was identified as the last person seen with her. He was questioned and arrested. A witness testified that Leal’s brother appeared at the party, agitated that Leal had arrived home bloody and saying he had killed a girl. Leal admitted being intoxicated and doing wrong but said he was not responsible for what prosecutors alleged. The question of protection for foreign nationals under the international treaty is not new. President George W Bush in 2005 agreed with an international court of justice ruling that Leal and 50 other Mexican-born inmates nationwide should be entitled to new hearings in US courts to determine if their consular rights were violated at the time of their arrests. The supreme court later overruled Bush. In 2008, José Medellín, who had been sentenced to death for participating in the rape and murder of two Houston teenage girls, raised a Vienna convention claim similar to the one pending for Leal. It failed and he was executed. Capital punishment Texas United States Mexico guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
HomeServe and nPower face £2m fines over repeated silent calls

Customers bombarded after glitch in call-centre technology – leading to Ofcom ruling against two firms Communications regulator Ofcom has evidence that nPower and HomeServe have been breaching the rules around silent and abandoned calls that could lead to a fine of up to £2m. Ofcom has issued a notification to both companies under the Communications Act as part of an ongoing investigation into activities that took place between 1 February 2011 and 21 March 2011. Ofcom said it has reasonable grounds to believe HomeServe and nPower “persistently misused an electronic communications network or services by virtue of its use of an automated calling system”. The evidence shows that HomeServe made an excessive number of abandoned calls during the period investigated; and made one or more repeat calls to specific numbers within 24 hours, when a call had been identified by Answer Machine Detection equipment as having been put through to an answer machine. Ofcom said nPower broke the rules by including marketing content within a recorded information message played in the event of an abandoned call. The notification gives both groups until 10 August 2011 to reply and take steps to “cease the misuse identified” or they could face fines of up to £2m each. On January 31 2011 Ofcom warned the industry to comply with new rules to clamp down on silent calls or face enforcement action, writing specifically to the call centre industry to spell out the regulations. The new rules place restrictions on the use of automated dialling equipment to prevent consumers being harassed by repeated silent calls from the same company. The technology is used by call centre operators to detect answer machines. But this can mistake a “live” consumer for an answering machine and cut off the call without the person hearing anything, resulting in a silent call. Ofcom said they can cause “significant distress” to consumers which can be made worse by repeated calls, leading to some people believing they are being specifically targeted. Ofcom received more than 9,000 complaints in 2010 about silent calls. Over 70% of those who complained told the regulator they had received two or more calls in a day from the same company. These silent calls were often over a period of days or even weeks. An nPower spokesman said: “Our average abandon rate has been consistently below the regulatory 3%. Ofcom’s concerns relate to individual non-consecutive days in which the rate exceeded this level. We believe that our prompt reminder to make energy savings is fully consistent with energy policy and does not constitute marketing.” A HomeServe statement said: “HomeServe confirms that this limit was exceeded by a single outsourced supplier. This fact was uncovered by our own internal audit processes, verified by independent, external auditors and reported to Ofcom on 26 April, 2011. The problem resulted from the use of answering machine detection (AMD) technology, and was remedied immediately upon discovery. “HomeServe takes the Ofcom regulations very seriously and as a result, AMD is no longer used on any HomeServe outbound calls, whether they originate in our own or in outsourced call centres. HomeServe has reviewed its internal control processes and can confirm that all of its internal and external dialler systems are now fully compliant with the new Ofcom regulations regarding silent/abandoned calls.” CPR Global , which manufactures call-blocking devices for use in the home, pointed out that Ofcom’s new rules do not apply to the 31% of nuisance calls that come from overseas companies. A spokeswoman said: “Cold calling can affect people in different ways and for those who suffer from Alzheimer’s, dementia or even depression, the calls can have dire effects on their anxiety levels which can result in adverse health implications. “Our Call Blocker is pre-programmed with 200 telemarketers and scam telephone numbers that are recognised as being the most persistent companies to CPR Global. Its unique ‘block now’ application means 100 extra telephone numbers can be blocked.” Consumers receiving nuisance calls should also join the telephone preference service register , although it takes up to 28 days after registering for all to be stopped, and complain to PhonepayPlus , the regulator for all UK premium rate phone services. Consumer affairs Internet, phones & broadband Ofcom Homeserve Mark King guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Frank Schaeffer: Bachmann’s Christianity Radical Even for Evangelicals

Click here to view this media For anyone not already familiar with Frank Schaeffer, I posted this interview back in 2009 just after Schaeffer came out with his book, Crazy for God — Frank Schaeffer, Author of “Crazy for God” on What’s Left of the GOP: Today the Republican Party is rooting for doom . Schaeffer has a new book out , this time focusing on his mother rather than his father as the previous book did and MSNBC’s Richard Lui brought him on to discuss the current crop of GOP presidential candidates and whether Michele Bachmann or Rick Perry should he get in, would actually have a chance at winning the nomination. Schaeffer didn’t pull any punches when explaining that Michele Bachmann’s radical right-wing religious beliefs are too far to the right even for most evangelical Christians and that the more voters get to know about her, the less likely the chances of her winning the nomination. I’d say I agree with him, but of course that relies on our corporate media doing their jobs, which we know they won’t unless we see a whole lot more interviews like this one. Schaeffer also did a great job of explaining how none of them actually care about the social issues other than to use them to dupe religious voters into supporting them so they can go serve their real masters after they get in office. Rough transcript below the fold. LUI: Frank, so, you know, as Americans and really Republican primary voters get to know Michele Bachmann a little bit more each and every week, will her faith be an asset going forward, do you think, to the election or a liability here? SCHAEFFER: It will be a liability with the general public when they learn how radical she is. She comes from a wing of the evangelical movement where takes the Bible literally, and that includes the old testament that has passages about stoning gay people to death and all the rest of it. And, of course, Michele Bachmann, like Sarah Palin and others on the far religious right is too politically savvy to express clearly what she believes. But the fact of the matter is, the part of Christianity she comes from is radical even for evangelical Bible believers. And so I think- I think gradually, it will become apparent to American voters that she could not win the general election. And Republicans are going to have to make a choice to either be a normal political party or, really, theocracy in waiting with people like Michele Bachmann, who in the best of all possible worlds, as far as she would see it, would produce a theocracy in the country where the Bible would be paramount and no longer the Constitution or the Bill of Rights. LUI: As we see the Tea Party energy continuously grow in the GOP, do you find that in the primary then that she will have some attraction, that she will generate a lot of momentum? SCHAEFFER: Yeah. I mean, you know, you mentioned my book Sex, Mom and God and one of the things I talk about in that book is charting the course of the religious right from their beginnings in the 1970s with the anti-abortion movement that my family had something to do with, to the present. And the fact of the matter is they have always engaged in these culture war topics when it comes to primary voters, this small core of hard right religious voters and then they have to change later. But you’ve got to understand something, and that is that Michele Bachmann and the others on the far right of the Republican Party have moved the whole party so far right that they are no longer normal political party. They are out of the mainstream to the extent that she represents a fringe. The problem is that fringe controls the nomination process in the primaries and you have to understand that the liability they run is that when the general public gets a look at this, they are going to run a long way away. So that’s the bind they are in, appeal to the fringe in the primaries or the general population. LUI: Now, Frank, your father was a writer, a theologian; Bachmann or the Bachmann family, reportedly, looking towards his writings. SCHAEFFER: Right. LUI: So there is some link here, at least to your family’s background, and you self-describe yourself as one of the founders of the religious right, to what she’s thinking and what she’s doing today. SCHAEFFER: Yeah. And I got out obviously, and the story of why I got out in Sex, Mom & God is very clear. But, I came to understand that these people actually hate the United States as it is. Look, they love a fictional, Christian America that wouldn’t include gay people, would not have choice and abortion rights for women and all the rest of this. But in terms of the real America, inclusive, diverse, sustaining of gay people as well as heterosexuals and so forth, this is an America they despise and that’s why they talk in terms of taking it back. Well from whom? That would be from the rest of us, ordinary American citizens under the rule of law. LUI: But Frank, hate is a pretty strong word here. These certainly are citizens of the United States and so far given what they have said and done… SCHAEFFER: Sure. LUI: …have not expressed hatred towards the United States. SCHAEFFER: Well, you know when you mentioned her husband talking about gay people being barbarians and if you look, for instance at Sarah Palin’s family, they’ve had a lot to do with the secessionist movement in Alaska. You’re not part of a movement that says it wants to secede from the union in the United States if you like this country. Folks like Michele Bachmann wrap themselves in the flag, but when push comes to shove, their religious values, theocratic values, they are not talking about the same America the rest of us are looking at. And the irony is of course when they get elected or they get famous in their politics, when Republicans actually come into office, the only people they actually serve is Wall Street, and so really these social issues are a red herring because they may get the votes of a certain portion of America, mostly white, middle and lower middle class Americans in the evangelical wing of Christianity, but when they get into national office what happens? It’s all about tax cuts for the wealthy, defunding education, narrowing the public space. That’s what the real program is and unfortunately they take advantage of a lot of well-meaning people who vote for them on social issues they care passionately about. When they get into power, it’s all about Wall Street and you know, they wouldn’t let the kind of people vote for them caddy for them on their golf link. LUI: Frank, we have got to go, but I do want to mention Rick Perry because we’ve had the introduction very quickly. He also has support from the religious right, from the conservative right. Would he not be a good possibility here to move towards the primary? SCHAEFFER: Well loo, any guy that starts a national run by calling a prayer meeting and mixing the issues of church and state as he has in Texas is someone who has his eye on this little group. But I say one more time just before we go. It’s total hypocrisy because these people know that group helps them win the primary but when the Republicans get into office it’s about serving corporate Wall Street interests. It has nothing to do with the social agenda they get elected on so it’s a scam, but it’s a scam that keeps working. Forty years of Republican domination of the American political process based on abortion, gay rights, these other things they wave around, but actually it’s really about corporate America.

Continue reading …
Space shuttle astronaut Jeff Hoffman – live Q&A

Jeff Hoffman, a veteran of five space shuttle flights, will be online here at 1pm to answer your questions about his experiences and opinions on the future of Nasa and human spaceflight. Please leave your questions in the comments field below Today at 1pm, we’re joined for a live web chat with Dr Jeff Hoffman , a veteran of five space shuttle flights, including the first mission to retrieve and repair the Hubble Space Telescope in 1993. Please post your questions for him below. Dr Hoffman has logged more than 1,211 hours in space and became the first astronaut to notch up 1,000 hours aboard the shuttle. He has travelled 21.5 million miles in space. He flew twice on Columbia, which was destroyed on return to Earth in 2003, and once on Atlantis, which – weather permitting – is due to launch from Kennedy Space Centre tomorrow, marking the last mission of the shuttle era. Hoffman has made numerous space walks and worked on tethered satellites that were dragged behind the space shuttle to generate electricity. He holds a PhD in astrophysics from Harvard University and is now a professor at the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics at MIT. Final space shuttle mission The space shuttle Space Nasa Ian Sample guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Iraq abuse ruling by European court says UK failed human rights role

Ruling in Strasbourg say Britain was occupying force and thereby took on judicial role of sovereign government Britain was an occupying power following the invasion of Iraq and failed to carry out effective investigations into the killing of civilians, the European court of human rights has ruled in a landmark judgment. The decision by the Strasbourg court could open the Ministry of Defence to a deluge of claims and add to the pressure for further public inquiries into the behaviour of troops in and around Basra following the 2003 invasion. By extending liability beyond the UK’s territorial limits and outside the confines of Europe, the ruling will have far-reaching implications for military operations around the world. The case was brought by the Birmingham-based firm Public Interest Lawyers on behalf of Iraqis who claimed their relatives had been variously shot dead, raped, disappeared or tortured by British soldiers between 2003 and 2006. In its judgment, the court said: “Following the removal from power of the Ba’ath regime and until the accession of the Iraqi interim government, the United Kingdom (together with the United States) assumed in Iraq the exercise of some of the public powers normally to be exercised by a sovereign government. “In particular, the United Kingdom assumed authority and responsibility for the maintenance of security in south-east Iraq. In those exceptional circumstances, a jurisdictional link existed between the United Kingdom and individuals killed in the course of security operations carried out by British soldiers during the period May 2003 to June 2004. “Since the applicants’ relatives were killed in the course of United Kingdom security operations during that period, the United Kingdom was required to carry out an investigation into their deaths.” Among those who died was Hazim Al-Skeini, 23, who was shot dead by a British army patrol. In his witness statement, his brother explained that, on 4 August 2003, members of his family had been in the village of al-Majidiyah for a funeral ceremony. “In Iraq, it is customary for guns to be discharged at a funeral,” the court said. “He stated that he saw soldiers shoot and kill his brother and another man – both unarmed and only about 10 metres away from the soldiers – for no apparent reason.” The court found that there had not been an effective investigation into five of the killings. It noted that in contrast, the UK has held an inquiry into the death of Baha Mousa, a hotel worker, who died while in the custody of British troops in 2003 (the inquiry’s report is due in the autumn). The UK was ordered by the court to pay damages to five of the applicants of €17,000 (£15,200) each and awarded tham jointly a further €50,000 in costs and expenses. The Strasbourg court also ruled in a second case, Al Jedda v United Kingdom, that the indefinite detention of a dual British-Iraqi citizen in a Basra facility run by UK forces was illegal. Hilal Abdul-Razzaq Ali al-Jedda, 53, was detained for three years. The army maintained that responsible for recruiting terrorists outside Iraq to commit atrocities there but no criminal charges were brought against him. Eric Metcalfe, director of the human rights group Justice, said: “The rulings send out two clear messages. The British government’s duties under human rights law do not stop at Dover, and they cannot be easily displaced by rulings of the UN security council. This is a good day for the international rule of law.” Phil Shiner, who led the team at Public Interest Lawyers said: “This is a monumental judgment … and an important day for our clients, many of whom can now force what the MoD has long-denied them – a public inquiry uncovering the truth about what the British army did to them and their loved ones.” Jim Duffy, another of the victims’ solicitors added: “The court’s judgment sends a clear message: wherever soldiers or other state agents act, they must do so whilst upholding, not violating, human rights. The violence, religious degradation, sexual abuse and, in many cases, gratuitous killing suffered by our clients must now be confronted.” Iraq European court of human rights Middle East Military Human rights Owen Bowcott guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
BSkyB bid: Government refuses to delay in wake of phone hacking

• Jeremy Hunt satisfied about safeguards, Lords told • Volume of submissions means quick decision unlikely The government has refused to suspend consideration of News Corporation’s takeover bid for BSkyB amid the phone-hacking scandal, but the volume of submissions it has received relating to the deal means it is unlikely any final decision will be made before the end of the summer. In a question in the House of Lords, the shadow leader of the house, Lady Royall, called for a delay “in the light of the loss of public and commercial confidence in News International”, News of the World’s parent company. But the Conservative peer, Lady Rawlings, said the culture secretary, Jeremy Hunt, was satisfied there were “sufficient safeguards” in place to make such a delay unnecessary. The BBC reported that more than 100,000 submissions relating to the BSkyB deal had been received by Hunt in less than a week, most opposed to the takeover, and the volume meant no decision would be taken until September. Rawlings alluded to a possible delay when she said no date had been set for the decision. “The secretary of state will not be rushed, he will be fair,” she said, adding that the decision would be made purely on the issue of media plurality. Royall’s question in the Lords followed a demand on Thursday morning by the Labour leader, Ed Miliband, that the decision be suspended. He accused David Cameron of not showing leadership and being “two steps behind public opinion”. The scrutiny of the BSkyB deal came as the backlash against the News of the World intensified with the Royal British Legion dropping the newspaper as its campaigning partner over allegations that the phones of families of members of the armed forces killed in action had been hacked. Advertisers are continuing to desert the paper. The chair of the Press Complaints Commission, Lady Buscombe, described the decision to appoint the former News of the World editor Rebekah Brooks to run an internal inquiry as “extraordinary”. The legion has worked with the paper to call for the military covenant, which promises fair treatment for those who fight for their country, to be enshrined in law. It said it had now suspended all relations with the News of the World and was reviewing its advertising budget with News International, which also publishes the Sun and the Times. The charity said it was “shocked to the core” by the allegations. Families of members of the armed forces killed in Afghanistan and Iraq expressed disgust that they were possibly targeted by Glenn Mulcaire, a private investigator who worked for the News of the World. Jim Gill, stepfather of Second Lieutenant Richard Shearer of the 1st Battalion, Staffordshire Regiment, who was killed in Iraq in July 2005 by a roadside bomb, said his family suspected their phone had been hacked but had not yet been contacted by police. He told BBC Breakfast he was unsurprised by the revelations but they were “very distressing”. The defence secretary, Liam Fox, said the latest allegations, if true, would represent an “outrageous breach of trust”, while Miliband described them as “grotesque”. Sainsbury’s and npower joined a host of other advertisers who have deserted the News of the World, at least temporarily, amid the scandal. Citing the “rising concerns of our customers”, Sainsbury’s said it was suspending advertising until the outcome of the investigation into phone hacking. Npower said it was suspending advertising and would review its future strategy. The two companies join Britain’s biggest advertiser, Proctor &Gamble, O2, Butlins, Virgin Holidays, Halifax bank, the Co-operative Group, Vauxhall and Mitsubishi in suspending deals with the newspaper. Buscombe said executives at News International needed to examine their consciences. “I think it’s extraordinary that Rupert Murdoch has asked Rebekah Brooks to lead their own internal inquiry into this,” she said. “In any other business that would not be allowed to happen. “I don’t know now whether she lied to me. All I’m saying is there are allegations out there and we have to be really careful about how we respond. And I think it’s important that all the executives at News International actually look to their own conscience. They need to give us the facts. We need to find out the facts.” Phone hacking News of the World Newspapers & magazines National newspapers Newspapers News International BSkyB Television industry News Corporation Media business Military House of Lords Haroon Siddique guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …