Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 710)
Continue reading …
Continue reading …
Open Thread with The Professional Left Weekly Podcast: Are we too hard on Republicans? Don’t ask David Brooks.

enlarge Credit: The Professional Left Time for your weekly podcast with the Professional Left , otherwise known as our own Driftglass and Bluegal . Links for this podcast include: Dunning Kruger Effect Chris Hayes Weighs in on Our Media’s Failures With Their Coverage of the Casey Anthony Trial Santorum accuses Obama of creating ‘only 240 million jobs’ Enjoy the podcast and have a great weekend everyone.

Continue reading …

Given the opportunity to directly relay the two sentences of House Speaker John Boehner's statement on the status of debt-ceiling and budget negotiations tonight, the Associated Press's Andrew Taylor and Jim Kuhnhenn, in their 9:29 p.m. report ( saved here at my web host for future reference, fair use and discussion purposes) disgracefully cut the Speaker's statement off after its first sentence and inserted seven paragraphs designed to minimize its full impact, leaving readers unaware of Boehner's full statement with the impression that its second sentence was uttered sometime and somewhere else. Boehner's full statement follows: Statement by Speaker Boehner on Debt Limit Discussions Washington (Jul 9) House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) released the following statement today regarding ongoing debt limit discussions with the White House: “Despite good-faith efforts to find common ground, the White House will not pursue a bigger debt reduction agreement without tax hikes. I believe the best approach may be to focus on producing a smaller measure, based on the cuts identified in the Biden-led negotiations, that still meets our call for spending reforms and cuts greater than the amount of any debt limit increase.” Here is what Taylor and Kuhnhenn rudely interjected between Boehner's two sentences (bolds and numbered tags are mine): The White House responded that Obama will continue to push to make as much progress on deficit reduction as possible. Boehner's statement came a day before he and seven of the top House and Senate leaders were scheduled to meet at the White House in a negotiating session and lay out their remaining differences. A deficit reduction deal is crucial to win Republican support for an increase in the nation's debt ceiling. The government's borrowing capacity is currently capped at $14.3 trillion and administration officials say it will go into default without action by Aug. 2. Obama tried to build political support for an ambitious package of spending cuts and new tax revenue [1] that would reduce the debt by $4 trillion over 10 years. But from the moment he proposed it, Republicans said they would reject any tax increases and Democrats objected to spending cuts in some of their most prized benefit programs, including Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. A bipartisan group of lawmakers led by Vice President Joe Biden had already identified, but not signed off on, about $2 trillion in deficit reductions, most accomplished through spending cuts. [2] But after holding a secret meeting with Boehner last weekend, Obama and his top aides said they believed an even bigger figure was attainable if both parties made politically painful, but potentially historic, choices. [3] In the end, the pressure from both sides was pushing against Obama's bigger goal. [4] Notes: [1] — What's under discussion is not “new” tax “revenue,” it's tax increases. As Senator John Kyl made clear earlier in the week, in a statement Reuters reporters tried to twist into openness to tax increases, Republicans are willing to look at sales of assets and user-fee adjustments to better reflect the underlying costs of services rendered as sources of one-time and ongoing “revenue” — but not tax increases. [2] — The phrase “mostly through spending cuts” gives readers the impression that the Biden package includes tax increases. It doesn't, as the second sentence in Mr. Boehner's statement indicates. But apparently Taylor and Kuhnhenn are hoping many readers won't get that far while they play stall-ball. [3] — Isn't it great how “historic choices” always seem to involve tax increases enacted now with spending cuts to come later (except that the spending cuts rarely show up in material form)? [4] — Yeah, Obama is the guy with the “bigger goal,” while Boehner is just some narrow-minded rube who would prefer a bigger economy over a bigger government. Because the AP reporters cut Boehner off, most readers will have every reason to believe that the second sentence of Mr. Boehner's statement was said separately from his official statement. It wasn't. “Clever,” guys. The first sentence in isolation makes Boehner look inflexible, while the second makes him open to bipartisanship with Biden's spending-cut proposals. We can't have readers thinking Republicans will work towards an agreement, can we? It doesn't seem at all unreasonable to expect two AP reporters to simply relay both parts of a two-sentence statement without interjecting the administration line. But apparently Taylor and Kuhnhenn are congenitally incapable of that. That's why the oft-used name Apparatchik Press so often applies to dispatches from the self-described, hopelessly conceited Essential Global News Network. In the meantime, many readers will agree with the Thatcherite suggestion I make at my home blog : Don't go wobbly, Mr. Boehner. Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com .

Continue reading …
AP Biz Writer on Good Stocks to Buy: ‘One Good Bet: The Jobless Aren’t Likely to Find Work Anytime Soon’

While Associated Press Economics writers like Christopher Rugaber and Paul Wiseman, as seen in a post this morning (at NewBusters ; at BizzyBlog ), talk of “baffled economists” and a job market that is “defying history,” one AP writer, in discussing stocks which have done well in this economy, has revealed what employment prospects really are with quite un-baffling certainty from the point of view of those who have to put their money where their expectations are, i.e., investors. The wire service's Bernard Condon cited a pawn shop operator, a payday lender, a debt-collection firm, and a rent-to-own outfit as companies which have outperformed the market and are expected to continue doing so. The reason for the expectation is found in the title of this post, which is also seen in the following excerpt from Condon's composition : How bad is it? Pawn shops, payday lenders are hot As the jobless rate inches up and the economic recovery sputters, investors looking for a few good stocks may want to follow the money – or rather the TV, the beloved Fender guitar, the baubles from grandma, the wedding ring. Profits at pawn shop operator Ezcorp Inc. have jumped by an average 46 percent annually for five years. The stock has doubled from a year ago, to about $38. … In investing, it's often better to focus on what you can safely predict, even if that safety is found in companies that thrive on hard times. One good bet: The jobless aren't likely to find work anytime soon. And companies profiting from their bad fortune will continue to do so. B-B-B-But I thought the president told us three months ago that “We are turning the corner.” And of course, there's been no shortage of Associated Press and other wire service reports telling us that the economy is on the “rebound” and that the joblessness problem is a result of “temporary factors,” blah-blah-blah-blech. Not so, as Condon explains, because when it comes to putting one's money where the greatest expected returns are, the companies whose prospects are bright are those which work with the financially at risk or cater to the growing number of Americans who have become misers by necessity: – Stock in payday lender Advance America Cash Advance Centers (AEA) has doubled from a year ago, to just under $8. Rival Cash America International Inc. (CSH) is up 64 percent, to $58. … – Profits at Encore Capital Group, a debt collector that targets people with unpaid credit cards bills and other debts, rose nearly 50 percent last year. Encore has faced class action suits in several states, including California, over its collection practices. The Minnesota attorney general filed a suit in March. No matter. The stock (ECPG) is up 59 percent from a year ago, to more than $30. – Stock in Rent-A-Center (RCII), which leases televisions, couches, computers and more, is up 57 percent from a year ago to nearly $32. Nine of the 11 analysts covering the company say it will rise further and that investors should buy it. The idea of investing in companies catering to the hard-up might not be palatable to some people. But it is profitable. Memo to Chris Rugaber and Paul Wiseman: It's also not baffling and certainly doesn't defy history. Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com .

Continue reading …

From John Shore blogging at the Christian Left, advice I can strongly endorse : That final point is well taken; this is an increasingly great time time to be a crooked politician. No more snooping reporters asking bothersome questions about expense accounts and behind-door meetings. No more impertinent requests for public records. No more “public watchdogs” sniffing around city hall, digging into corners where they might unearth meaty bones best left buried. We hear much talk these days about “citizen journalists.” And it’s good that we do; in some very real ways, citizen journalists are the only journalists left. The big dailies aren’t covering city hall anymore. So if you want city hall covered, you have to cover it yourself. And who better to do that than you and citizens like you? Nobody cares about local politics like local citizens. Nobody can. The adage is true for a reason; all politics is local. If you’re a blogger, start sitting in on, and writing about, city council meetings. Get to know who’s who in your local city government. Get on the email lists coming out your city and county’s primary government offices. Show up at press conferences. Attend public forums. Raise questions. Insist on explanations. Request private meetings. Help the people who work for the office of the mayor and other local public officials to remember that they work for you and people just like you. Help restore the balance of power between the local citizenry and the people who were elected to represent them. And don’t go it alone, either. That’s too difficult; there’s too much ground to cover. Instead, reach out to your fellow informed local bloggers. Join or form a coalition of local politico bloggers such that, after awhile, your group becomes the go-to place for people in your area wanting to understand what’s really happening with their tax dollars and local resources. Be thorough; be precise; be professional; work in coordination with others. And stay at it. You’ll get the results you’re after. You will force politicians and government officials to be as accountable as they should be. You’ll provide an invaluable service to your community. You’ll make a difference. The fourth estate isn’t dead. It’s just got a whole new set of offices. And one of the best of those offices could be as close as your kitchen table. It’s not as if most of us have jobs anymore, right?

Continue reading …

From John Shore blogging at the Christian Left, advice I can strongly endorse : That final point is well taken; this is an increasingly great time time to be a crooked politician. No more snooping reporters asking bothersome questions about expense accounts and behind-door meetings. No more impertinent requests for public records. No more “public watchdogs” sniffing around city hall, digging into corners where they might unearth meaty bones best left buried. We hear much talk these days about “citizen journalists.” And it’s good that we do; in some very real ways, citizen journalists are the only journalists left. The big dailies aren’t covering city hall anymore. So if you want city hall covered, you have to cover it yourself. And who better to do that than you and citizens like you? Nobody cares about local politics like local citizens. Nobody can. The adage is true for a reason; all politics is local. If you’re a blogger, start sitting in on, and writing about, city council meetings. Get to know who’s who in your local city government. Get on the email lists coming out your city and county’s primary government offices. Show up at press conferences. Attend public forums. Raise questions. Insist on explanations. Request private meetings. Help the people who work for the office of the mayor and other local public officials to remember that they work for you and people just like you. Help restore the balance of power between the local citizenry and the people who were elected to represent them. And don’t go it alone, either. That’s too difficult; there’s too much ground to cover. Instead, reach out to your fellow informed local bloggers. Join or form a coalition of local politico bloggers such that, after awhile, your group becomes the go-to place for people in your area wanting to understand what’s really happening with their tax dollars and local resources. Be thorough; be precise; be professional; work in coordination with others. And stay at it. You’ll get the results you’re after. You will force politicians and government officials to be as accountable as they should be. You’ll provide an invaluable service to your community. You’ll make a difference. The fourth estate isn’t dead. It’s just got a whole new set of offices. And one of the best of those offices could be as close as your kitchen table. It’s not as if most of us have jobs anymore, right?

Continue reading …
Frank Lindh: America’s barbaric treatment of my son John Walker Lindh

In 1998, aged 17, my son John Walker Lindh travelled to Yemen to study Islam and learn Arabic. In April 2001 he went to Afghanistan. Then 9/11 happened. He was captured by US troops, tortured, and jailed for 20 years, an innocent victim of America’s ‘war on terror’ John Phillip Walker Lindh, my son, was raised a Roman Catholic, but converted to Islam when he was 16 years old. He has an older brother and a younger sister. John is

Continue reading …
Overseas artists boycott Britain in protest at  visa clampdown

A Russian-born poet on US passport, Alex Galper, is held in cell and deported for planning to speak at arts festival A growing number of foreign artists, ranging from grassroots fringe performers to world-renowned stars, are ruling this country out of their future travel plans due to difficulties with obtaining visas. They are following in the footsteps of the admired Iranian film director Abbas Kiarostami, who abandoned plans to come to Britain to direct an opera after the UK embassy in Tehran asked him to submit his application documents twice. Since its introduction in 2008, a revised system for short-term visitors has seen many artists, photographers and musicians threatened with deportation . Border officials routinely take fingerprints and ask for assurances that visitors do not plan to use their cameras, paintbrushes or instruments , in case they are coming for paid work. The latest high-profile artist to rue his decision to travel to Britain is the Russian writer Alex Galper. A fortnight ago the acclaimed poet, who studied under Allen Ginsberg in New York, came to Britain on his American passport to give a poetry recital. But he was refused entry at Luton airport and is threatened with a 10-year ban. “I said to them, ‘I don’t have to tell you what I am doing. I am an American citizen.’ But they put me in the deportation room,” said Galper this weekend from New York. His case has fuelled efforts by the anti-censorship pressure group English PEN – together with the London Mayor’s office – to call on the government to scrap the approach currently adopted by the UK Border Agency. Jonathan Heawood, director of English PEN, said: “The UK Border Agency seem to have lost their passport to common sense. They told us that their heavy-handed treatment of visiting artists was a thing of the past, but that message has clearly not filtered through to the airport officials who treated Alex Galper so appallingly. A visa for unpaid artists already exists and should have been offered to Alex. Instead, he was treated like a criminal and deported without his personal belongings, and the charity event he had hoped to attend was ruined.” English PEN argues that foreign artists do not take work from British and European residents since they are invited here for their specific abilities. The organisation would like to see the so-called Entertainer Visitor Route redefined as Artist Visitors to provide more clarity. At the moment, only artists who come into Britain to take part in a “permit-free” event, such as the annual Edinburgh International Festival, are allowed to accept a fee. PEN claims this creates unnecessary confusion. “The current points-based visa system places a huge financial and bureaucratic responsibility on artists,” added Heawood. “To invite just one artist to the UK as a ‘licensed sponsor’ costs over £500. This might be affordable to large institutions, but is far too expensive for small groups. The UKBA don’t understand writers and artists, and they don’t understand the value of art and literature to the UK economy and society.” Galper did not need to apply in advance for a normal tourist visa. Although Russian by birth, he has a job in New York, and writes and promotes his poetry part-time. He first flew to Britain a month ago to stay with a friend and then accepted an invitation to attend a poetry event in Germany, taking an overnight trip to Berlin. Galper also received an invitation from a London-based theatre company, the Gruntlers Arts Group, to appear for no fee at a fundraising gala night. However, when Galper flew back to Luton from Germany, he was questioned by border officials who were suspicious that he could not show them an onward ticket for travel. Galper had, he said, made a booking for a return flight over the internet, but had no paper documentation. The Border Agency officials called Galper’s friend in London, who mentioned that he was due at the charity poetry event that evening. As a result, it was ruled that Galper had been deliberately deceptive and had intended to work in Britain. After making a phone call to the event organiser, David Parry, Galper was held in a cell overnight before being deported back to Germany the next day. “I knew all these people had been waiting for me in London,” said Galper. “Appearing there and meeting people would have been the highlight of my life. Instead I had to leave all my clothes at my friend’s house and travel without them for a month.” Back in London, the fundraising event was a flop and the journalists who came to interview Galper were sent home. “I am still hopping mad with anger about it,” said Parry. “I wanted to get some Beat poets together and there was a lot of interest. Then I got a call from Alex at the airport and he could not understand what was happening to him.” A Border Agency spokesperson said: “Creative artists from across the world are welcome to perform in the UK. However, as with any visitors, we expect individuals to meet entry requirements.” Immigration and asylum Arts policy Poetry guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Statue looted from church in the Blitz returned

A medieval statue stolen from a London church in 1941 was spotted at an auction house A treasured 17th-century statue that was looted from one of London’s last-surviving medieval churches during the Blitz has been returned to its rightful owners more than 70 years after it disappeared. The work, a sculpted and painted likeness of Dr Peter Turner, an eminent 17th-century botanist and physician at London’s St Bartholomew’s hospital, was stolen from St Olave’s church near the Tower of London on the night of 17 April 1941, when bombing severely damaged the church. Last month, the 1614 statue was finally brought back home to the church, restored in the 1950s, ending a 14-month legal dispute, which exposed the art trade’s failure to question the origin of works being sold on. In 2009, churchwardens received a tip-off from the Museum of London that the statue was about to be sold by Dreweatts, a British auctioneer, on behalf of an anonymous seller for an estimated £70,000. The church lodged a claim, and Dreweatts withdrew the statue from auction, retaining it until the case was resolved. The seller rejected calls to hand it back, insisting he had acquired it in good faith. The Art Loss Register, which liaises with the police and the art trade to help track down stolen artworks, waived its fees to take up the church’s cause. Detective work by the register’s lawyer, Christopher A. Marinello, revealed a chain of previous buyers included Paul de Grande, a Belgian ecclesiastical dealer, who had bought the statue from a trader in Holland who, in turn, had named a British dealer, Gray Dench from West Malling, as the original seller. Marinello’s research showed that the name was false and the trail led him to Gray Elcombe, who operated as an antique dealer and had been imprisoned for serious crimes. Marinello said: “I do not believe that de Grande or the Dutch dealer knew that this bust was stolen. The legal issues involved are very complex and will likely be discussed in art law publications in the future. However, both dealers knew that the bust originated from St. Olave’s. One simple phone call to St. Olave’s would have brought the true history to light.” The Dutch dealer declined to comment, but de Grande told The Observer that he did not ring St Olave’s because wartime photographs of its bombed state led him to believe it had been destroyed. In fact, St Olave’s stonework was largely reconstructed in the early 1950s. He detailed its connection to St Olave’s to the auction-house – information which, he said, ultimately led to its return. The statue, which had stood in St Olave’s for centuries, surviving the Great Fire of 1666 and watching over the resting place of diarist Samuel Pepys, will undergo conservation work before being reinstalled in the church. London Second world war Dalya Alberge guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …