Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 706)
Silvio Berlusconi’s firm told to pay €560m over bribery

Fininvest ordered to pay out for bribing judge in 1991, dealing heaviest blow yet to Berlusconi’s business career As one international media tycoon was flying to London to deal with the crisis in his empire, another cut short a visit to the Mediterranean island of Lampedusa and hastened to Rome after being dealt the heaviest blow yet in his controversial business career. Silvio Berlusconi learned on Saturday that judges in Milan had ordered his company Fininvest to hand over more than half a billion euros to his deadliest rival. The money is compensation for bribery of a judge to rule in Berlusconi’s favour in his struggle with the industrialist Carlo De Benedetti for control of Mondadori, Italy’s biggest publishing house. Last week it was discovered that a clause had been inserted in a package of budgetary adjustments that would have meant Fininvest did not have to pay the compensation until it had exhausted the appeals process. In Italy, that can take years, or even decades. Several ministers have since said they knew nothing about the insertion until it was reported in the media. But the prime minister has insisted it was discussed in cabinet. Berlusconi himself was put on trial for bribery in connection with the Mondadori judgment, but the charges against him were dropped in 2001 after being timed out by a statute of limitations. In their written ruling, however, the Milan appeals court judges said he was “jointly responsible” for the corruption. They said it was “beyond any plausible reasoning” that Fininvest’s lawyers would have been given the money to bribe the judge while “the owner of the company that paid and benefited was kept in the dark”. It was obvious they would not have acted “in the absence of an unequivocal order” from Berlusconi, the judges said. The prime minister had not given any reaction to the sentence by Sunday afternoon. But his daughter Marina Berlusconi, president of Fininvest, told the Corriere della Sera newspaper the case would be taken to Italy’s highest appeals court. “My father has never anything wrong,” she said. She noted that the 1991 ruling at the centre of the dispute was underwritten by three judges, only one of whom was subsequently convicted of accepting the bribe. A lower court had fixed the compensation at €750m. The Milan appeals court reduced the figure to €560m. Marina Berlusconi said the lower figure was still out of all proportion. Fininvest’s 50% holding in Mondadori, she said, was worth less than half that amount. The Mondadori group includes nine publishers and more than 40 magazines including the news weekly Panorama and the Italian edition of Cosmopolitan. Silvio Berlusconi Italy Europe John Hooper guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Chris Matthews Asks if Michele Bachmann is in Tune With the Republican Base

Click here to view this media After showing a number of clips in the run up to the next segment where Michele Bachmann clearly showed she didn’t have a lot of use for either facts or concern for flame throwing, the panel on The Chris Matthews Show pondered whether the now very “serious” and now “disciplined” Michele Bachmann somehow has her finger on the pulse of the Republican electorate in America. What was amazing to me is that even after showing how off the cliff Bachmann is and that there is no way in hell she should be elected to lead this country, they pretty much calmly discussed how the Republican Party has gone off the rails, and without explaining just how dangerous someone like Bachmann would be should the American public actually turn out to be insane enough to elect her, and pondered whether Bachmann now represents the heart of the Republican Party. I never thought I’d live see the day when our beltway Villagers were seriously discussing Michele Bachmann’s potential road to the presidential nomination, but here we are. MATTHEWS: Andrea, I hear something there that’s powerful. It’s connecting the regular people, the base of the country, the regular people and their sense of conservative history, their conservative view of history. MITCHELL: I think you’re actually right and there’s a new PEW poll which says that people do not want to see their Medicare, Social Security, I mean, not surprisingly, they don’t want to see their benefits cut, they don’t want to see taxe increases. The majority of people in this country are not willing to do the things that John Boehner is now prepared apparently to do, that the President wants us to do, that leadership, arguably needs to do in order to get past this crisis. Michele Bachmann really has her finger on that pulse. She’s put up a new ad, her first ad in Iowa, which said I will not vote for a debt ceiling. MATTHEWS: No matter what’s on it. MITCHELL: Exactly. And even if it has all of the cuts that the Republicans want. So she is taking it one step farther and I think that she is really in tune with the majority of the people, whether they understand the facts or not. MATTHEWS: Okay, that’s Iowa, the religious right and she may be perfectly, you know… perfect pitch, will that sell across the Republican base of the country? Can she compete for the nomination right to the end? PAGE: I don’t think so. She has all of the vulnerabilities of Barry Goldwater who got the nomination back in ’64… MATTHEWS: But he won the nomination. PAGE: But he did because at that time the moderates were weak and they’re weak now. That’s her best shot because it’s a shrunken party from what it used to be. But I think because of recent events a lot of the Republican moderates, the David Brooks type are going to be the ones to stand up and call a halt, but after South Carolina. MATTHEWS: I wonder whether the cerebral writers like George Will and David Brooks, great people, are not really in tune with that base out there, is she? WOODWARD: Well, that’s right and this could be a flash in the pan and remember Mike Huckabee won the Iowa primary in 2008, Buchanan won the New Hampshire primary in 1996. So we’ll just have to see, but I would go the conventional wisdom route on this. I think this all helps Romney. There’s lots of debate. There’s lots of pie throwing. She probably won’t go in the history books. But again, you never know in American politics… MATTHEWS: Jamie there’s some spark there I hear. She seems to have the perfect pitch for some people in the country. TARABAY: Well I think… I think there’s something interesting about the fact that she’s so categorical about it. She’s yes or no. And for a lot of back and forth that we see in Washington, I think that must be very refreshing. MATTHEWS: I think the purity tests that she passes, they’re so crystal clear, I think there’s a potential that there’s been tectonic shifts in the Republican Party over the years, that places her more in the center of the real Republican heart than Mitt Romney, who I think still is seen as a moderate, and that party is not run by moderates. MITCHELL: Well, it’s the calendar that’s in her favor. If you look at Iowa, to a certain extent New Hampshire, perhaps less though, but certainly South Carolina and then you go down to Florida. She’s got that geography and calender in her favor.

Continue reading …
CBS Touts a Pro-Gay ‘It Gets Better’ Video, While Media Ignore How It Gets Worse (As in Fired) for Christians

The blog LGBTQ Nation praised a new “CBS Cares” video that CBS employees made in the “It Gets Better” video series affirming gay teenagers against bullying. But for Christians, it gets worse. They don't get bullied. They just get fired. Take the case of evangelical speaker Frank Turek, who wrote at Townhall.com about being fired from Cisco Systems. When a homosexual manager found out on the Internet that I had authored a book giving evidence that maintaining our current marriage laws would be best for society, he couldn’t tolerate me and requested I be fired. An HR executive canned me within hours without ever speaking to me. It sounds like the Cisco Systems version of the Juan Williams story. He concluded; Cisco’s chief “Inclusion and Diversity” officer, Ms. Marilyn Nagel, had trouble on the phone defining what “inclusion and diversity” actually means at Cisco, so she sent me several links from the Cisco website. As in our conversation, I found no specific definition on the website but plenty of platitudes, such as Cisco is committed to “valuing and encouraging different perspectives, styles, thoughts, and ideas.” If that’s the case, then why not value my “perspectives, styles, thoughts and ideas?” Because only certain perspectives, styles, thoughts and ideas are approved, you see. “Inclusion and diversity” to corporate elites actually means exclusion for those that don’t agree with the approved views. Peter LaBarbera at Americans for Truth added: One reason I deduce this is that while attending (undercover) the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force “Creating Change” meeting earlier this year, I listened as a homosexual activist described (to a room full of fellow “gay” activists) a church talk given by Turek that he had attended as a critic. The homosexual advocate described Turek’s presentation and demeanor as kind and bereft of malice. This particular LGBT activist works diligently to convert Christians to a pro-“gay rights” mindset, and yet – even as he opposed Turek’s ideas – he found no hatred for homosexuals in the man. Anika Smith at Evolution News noted that Turek is not alone in the Fired Christian category: This story is becoming too common for a free society. Blogger Max Andrews reports on the Frank Turek discrimination case: Dr. Turek was hired by Cisco back in 2008 to train in leadership techniques and team building for their Remote Operations Services team. Dr. Turek “was fired as a vendor for his political and religious views, even though those views were never mentioned or expressed during his work at Cisco.” What happened was one of the managers in Dr. Turek's program Googled Turek and noticed that he had authored a book, which advocated a particular position on marriage that this manager, a self-identified homosexual, disagreed with. A complaint was filed against Dr. Turek for not having values consistent with Cisco. If this story sounds like you may have heard it before, it's because there's a trend. Andrews notes: This whole situation is strikingly similar, perhaps even worse than the wrongful termination of NASA's JPL information technology specialist David Coppedge… Coppedge was terminated for allegedly “pushing” intelligent design upon his coworkers. JPL associated this with Coppedge's “religious beliefs” and so Coppedge sued on grounds of religious discrimination. (I suggest reading the articles listed for a full account). Cisco meets a sub-par standard of internal consistency and had a knee-jerk reaction to, well they didn't really know what it was they were reacting to. Thought crimes have filtered down from academia into the workplace. Regardless of what you think of Dr. Turek's views, that he should be fired merely for having them is alarming, and everyone who values academic freedom should be watching this closely.

Continue reading …
Rights groups fear wave of deaths as Thailand faces new drugs crackdown

Pledge by PM-in-waiting as methamphetamine addiction rockets echoes brother’s 2003 war on gangs At first the tablets made life easier for Santhisuk: they helped him endure the long hours lugging heavy fabric bales in a Bangkok textiles factory. Gradually he noticed he was angrier and more aggressive on the days he skipped them. But it was only when arrested for a third time – and sent to rehabilitation at a Buddhist temple – that he admitted his addiction to methamphetamine. Now clean, the 19-year-old labourer is worrying about what will happen when he leaves the sanctuary of Wat Saphan and returns home. “It will be difficult because all my friends still take it. Drug use is so widespread now that everybody thinks it’s normal,” he said. Monks at the temple in Klong Toey, one of Bangkok’s poorest areas, say they have seen a huge increase in addiction rates. The problem has spread far beyond the Thai capital. The number of methamphetamine users in Thailand will reach 1.1 million this year, the head of the country’s anti-drug police told the Guardian – equivalent to one in every 60 citizens. The number of users has soared by 100,000 annually over the last five to six years, said Lieutenant-General Atitep Panjamanond. Yingluck Shinawatra, the prime minister in waiting, has already pledged “a new war on drugs” to eliminate them within 12 months, alarming human rights groups who fear a repeat of her brother’s 2003 crackdown. More than 2,500 people died in three months after Thaksin Shinawatra ordered police to draw up blacklists of suspected dealers and act “decisively and without mercy”. Though the police blamed gang crime for most of the deaths – they said 68 were shot by officers “in self-defence” – human rights groups say there is compelling evidence of extra-judicial killings. A committee later reported that more than half the dead, including a nine-year-old boy, had not been involved in the drugs trade. But the campaign was hugely popular and as drug use rises, many want a return to tough action. “Personally, I think the killings were a good thing. If you leave it to the courts [dealers] just cycle in and out of prison,” said Aminna Bedinlae, 84, who lost her son to drugs and now runs anti-abuse programmes in Klong Toey, where 46 residents were shot. Substance abuse had always been rife in the Bangkok slum, but in the past glue-sniffing was more common, said the 84-year-old. “Now they start off sniffing glue at six or seven and move on … [Methamphetamine] is more expensive so they get involved with crime – theft or burglary– and it makes them more aggressive. “My neighbour’s son steals from the family and demands 300 baht [for drugs] every day. If she hasn’t got it, he hits her.” Drivers and labourers have long relied on methamphetamine tablets – known here as yaba or “crazy drug” – to sustain them through gruelling work sessions. But Atitep said recreational use was extremely common and that children as young as 13 are taking it, with five- and six-year-olds being used as mules. Last month the public health minister said 6,700 children aged 7 to 17 were rehabilitated in the first half of this year. Experts warn regular use can lead to addiction and psychiatric problems, and say the drug is associated with violent and aggressive behaviour . Atitep said about 70% of methamphetamine comes across the Burmese border and blamed ethnic militias for churning out more drugs to fund their fight against the regime . The price of a tablet has fallen to as little as 150 baht (£3) in places; half the 2004 price. His department seized 33m tablets in 2009, and 60m last year. “That doesn’t give me pleasure, because there is a lot more supply,” the police chief said. “Today we seize 1m tablets. Tomorrow they produce 2m.” One of his teams had just seized 30,000 tablets in Nakhon Pathom province. But officers who traced the gang bosses behind the deal discovered they were already jailed and had continued to trade via smuggled mobile phones. Atitep said changes in values and society were contributing to increasing drug use. Others say the economic fall out from 2008′s global downturn, and the distraction of authorities by political turmoil, have exacerbated problems. Some allege that corrupt officers are facilitating the trade. At Wat Saphan, monks fear another crackdown would only push problems underground. “When Thaksin came along it was brutal. There was shooting — bam, bam, bam – and were the results worth it?” asked one monk, Phra Kru Manit. “Do you know who the kingpins are? Do you know which officials are involved? Deal with that, then deal with the problem on the streets.” The real solution lay in rehabilitation programmes and better educational and economic opportunities for residents, he argued. Yingluck told AFP before the election that she would “handle the drugs policy with care [for] human rights”. Montira Kantapin, a spokeswoman for Yingluck’s Puea Thai party, said a working group was considering options. “No one is disputing the government’s desire to take on the drugs industry. It is the means we are concerned about,” said Benjamin Zawacki, Amnesty International’s south-east Asia researcher. Sunai Phasuk of fellow charity Human Rights Watch said Yingluck’s pledge to eradicate drugs was the group’s biggest concern. The outgoing government had identified suspects in a similar way but “with the Democrats’ approach they are sent to a bootcamp facility [without proper medical help to quit]; with Thaksin’s approach they might end up dead,” he said. He said that many of those killed in the 2003 crackdown had been “victims of personal revenge or sloppy categorisation”. One couple was shot dead after acquiring suspicious wealth; it later emerged that they had won the lottery. Thailand Drugs trade Thaksin Shinawatra Human rights Tania Branigan guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Martine Aubry hits back over alcoholism rumours

Socialist hopeful in French election threatens legal action over rumours and allegations her husband is Islamist Martine Aubry, a challenger for the Socialist ticket in next year’s French presidential election, has threatened legal action over allegations that her husband is an Islamist and denounced rumours that she has suffered from alcoholism. Politicians on the left have long warned that the 2012 French presidential race risked descending into a battle of personal smear campaigns. Charges of attempted rape against the former Socialist frontrunner Dominique Strauss-Kahn in New York and a new legal complaint over an alleged attempted rape in France, as well as stories on his wealth and pursuit of women, have intensified the scrutiny of presidential hopefuls. Aubry, the Socialist leader and mayor of Lille, threatened to sue websites which did not remove references to her husband, the lawyer Jean-Louis Brochen, as an “Islamist” or “Salafist”. In 1993, before France’s law banning religious symbols in schools, Brochen defended schoolgirls threatened with exclusion for wearing headscarves and a Jewish boy who wore a skull cap. Brochen, a staunch secularist, has said it was a lawyer’s role to defend all sorts of cases. The Journal du Dimanche reported that Aubry made telephone warnings to people she suspected of slandering her husband or spreading rumours that she had fought alcoholism or suffered health problems. These included a former minister under Jacques Chirac and a senior figure at the Elysée. The paper said one former government minister had said in private, without producing proof, that Aubry had undergone two detox treatments for alcohol use in a clinic in the south of France. Socialists suspect the Elysée and Nicolas Sarkozy’s ruling rightwing UMP party of stoking gossip against Aubry. This charge was rejected outright by Nadine Morano, minister for learning and vocational training, who said Aubry was portraying herself as a victim to detract from the shortcomings of the Socialist campaign. In recent days, Aubry has repeatedly dismissed the rumours. Le Monde reported that on a Turin trip, Aubry joked to media: “You all know I swig whisky hidden under my djellaba [north African loose robe].” The former rightwing prime minister Dominique de Villepin, who also has ambitions to challenge Sarkozy for the presidency, said rumours about Aubry were “scandalous” and “foul” and warned that no one should play dirty politics. The latest poll, for Ifop, found that 46% of French people felt the Socialist François Hollande was most capable of beating Sarkozy, followed by Aubry on 27%. France Europe Angelique Chrisafis guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Syrian ‘national dialogue’ conference boycotted by angry opposition

Vice-president says talks will lead to ‘the transformation of Syria’, but dissidents refuse to attend while crackdown continues Opposition leaders boycotted a “national dialogue” conference on reform with Syria’s ruling Ba’ath party on Sunday, vowing not to meet the regime while protesters were still being killed in the streets. Opening the two-day conference, Syria’s vice-president, Farouk al-Sharaa, portrayed it as a potential turning point in the country’s political history. “We hope that it will lead to … the transformation of Syria into a pluralistic, democratic state where its citizens are equal,” Sharaa told delegates at the Sahara hotel in Damascus. But the 200 delegates consisted mainly of Ba’ath party members, intellectuals close to the regime and independent parliamentarians. Opposition figures, activists in the Local Co-ordinating Committees (LCC) who represent protesters and exiled dissidents, said they rejected email invitations due to the continuing killing and lack of trust in the regime’s promises to reform. “While the regime is meeting – and that is what today was – there are funerals in other cities and people continue to be killed and arrested,” said Razan Zeitouneh, a lawyer and LCC member in Damascus. Human rights groups say at least 1,500 civilians and 350 security force members have been killed since Syria’s uprising started in mid-March and thousands more have been detained. The conference was organised to discuss short-term reforms, such as a review of the restrictive media laws, and to draw up a political road map to democracy, but the government has not said how long that process should take. Reforms such as the lifting of emergency law have been promised but not fully implemented. Most international journalists remain banned from the country, despite pledges to create a free media. Most analysts say the regime cannot reform without losing its grip on power. “Any true reform, such as a move to democracy, is a dream because it would weaken the regime,” said one opposition figure who asked not to be named. “But today’s meeting is good because it shows how far the street has pushed and, by making promises, the regime is raising the bar for itself.” In Midan, a central Damascus neighbourhood which suffered its first casualty of the uprising on Friday, many residents were sceptical about the meeting. “We don’t want to talk two days after someone died here,” said one 31-year-old man. Activists in the neighbourhood said 25-year-old Mohamed Dakdak died after being shot in the head during protests on what the opponents called “No Dialogue Friday”. At least 14 people were reportedly killed across the country on Friday but Dakdak’s death marked the first instance that live ammunition has been fired at people rather than into the air in this sensitive area in the capital, and it could lead to the spread of unrest in Damascus. Although protests in the capital remain small, acts of resistance have become more common. In some neighbourhoods locals have distributed lists of informers, some Damascenes have donated money to protesters, and acts of civil disobedience targeting the economy have proliferated. Pro-regime supporters have become increasingly bullish, throwing rubbish and tomatoes at the French embassy on Sunday and protesting outside the US embassy. The US and French ambassadors were summoned to see foreign minister Walid al-Moallem after their trip to the city of Hama at the weekend, which Syria’s government deemed “flagrant interference in Syria’s domestic affairs”. Hama’s residents welcomed US ambassador Robert Ford with roses, saying he had stopped a bloody crackdown on Friday after four weeks during which the government lost control of the city. Nidaa Hassan is a pseudonym for a journalist in Damascus Syria Middle East Arab and Middle East unrest Nidaa Hassan Julian Borger guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
US suspends Pakistan military aid as diplomatic relations worsen

Decision to withhold $800m taken as relations become increasingly fraught following the killing of Osama bin Laden The Pakistan military declared it did not need US military aid as the White House confirmed that it would withhold some $800m (£498m) in assistance to the country’s armed forces. The row will worsen the already poisonous relationship between the two “allies”, which since the unilateral US raid to kill Osama bin Laden in May has lurched towards breakdown. Pakistan recently expelled US military trainers from the country, limited the ability of US diplomats and other officials to get visas, and restricted CIA operations on its territory. “The Pakistani relationship is difficult but it must be made to work over time. But until we get through these difficulties we will hold back some of the money that the American taxpayers have committed to give them,” William Daley, the White House chief-of-staff, told ABC News on Sunday. At stake is Pakistani co-operation against al-Qaida, the Taliban and other extremist groups, which the increasingly bitter relationship is putting at risk. Much of al-Qaida’s remaining leadership is believed to be hiding in Pakistan, while Pakistani territory is used as a safe haven by Afghan Taliban and the allied Haqqani network, fighting across the border in Afghanistan. The new US defence secretary, Leon Panetta, said over the weekend that he believed Bin Laden’s successor, Ayman al-Zawahiri, was in Pakistan’s tribal area and “he’s one of those we would like to see the Pakistanis target”. Pakistan responded by asking for the US to share the intelligence on Zawahiri’s whereabouts. Nuclear-armed Pakistan is meanwhile fighting its home-grown extremists in the tribal area on the border with Afghanistan, where a new offensive was launched earlier this month. Major General Athar Abbas, the chief spokesman for the Pakistan military, said that the military had received no formal notification of any aid being cut. He also pointed out that the army chief, General Ashfaq Kayani, had already declared that cash reimbursements to the military, known as coalition support funds, should go instead to the civilian government, where there was more need. “We have conducted our [anti-extremist] military operations without external support or assistance,” said Abbas. “Reports coming out of the US are aimed at undermining the authority of our military organisations.” Critical stories about Pakistan are leaked on an almost daily basis to the American press, riling Pakistani public and official opinion against Washington. Many in Pakistan believe there is a concerted American effort to weaken Pakistan and its armed forces, which are some of the largest in the world. For Washington, Pakistan’s refusal to launch an offensive against the Haqqani network and suspicions that Bin Laden benefited from some kind of official support to live in Pakistan has corroded ties. There are also questions hanging over future civilian aid, which is meant to provide $1.5bn a year in economic help. Cyril Almeida, a columnist with Pakistan’s Dawn newspaper, said the country was in danger of becoming internationally isolated, while US policy towards Pakistan was muddled. “The US can’t decide they if they want to stay in this relationship or cut Pakistan off,” he said. “These leaks and pressure tactics just confirm to the army generals the view that America is no friend of Pakistan and it wishes Pakistan harm.” Since 2001, the US has provided $21bn in civilian and military assistance, including $4.5bn in the 2010-2011 financial year, as aid was increased under the Obama administration. Two proposed bills in Congress over the last week, which were voted down, would have cut off aid to Pakistan altogether. Pakistan’s economy is spiralling downwards, with electricity shortages shutting down industry, and rising food and fuel prices causing protests on the streets. Karachi, the country’s economic powerhouse, is often shut down by ethnic gang violence, which has claimed more than 100 lives in the current spate of bloodshed. Pakistan United States US military US foreign policy al-Qaida Global terrorism Taliban Saeed Shah guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Kent Conrad Drops Senate Dems’ Budget On The Table: Will Anyone Pay Attention?

enlarge After a week of flurries and fears that Democrats are about to give away the store to keep the nation from defaulting on its debt, Kent Conrad presented his budget proposal to Democrats. Unlike the Republican proposal, it’s a 50/50 blend of cuts and tax increases. Washington Post reports : “I explained to the President and Vice President how the Senate Budget Committee Democrats developed a plan that achieves $4 trillion in deficit reduction in a balanced and fair way,” Conrad said in a statement. “It is my hope the plan will help influence the bipartisan negotiations and help them reach a comprehensive and balanced deficit reduction agreement.” Under the blueprint, the top income tax rate would rise to 39.6 percent for individuals earning more than $500,000 a year and families earning more than $1 million. That group, which constitutes the nation’s richest 1 percent of households, would also pay a 20 percent rate on capital gains and dividends, rather than the 15 percent rate now in effect. In addition to raising rates for the very wealthiest families, the blueprint proposes to obtain fresh revenue by targeting offshore tax havens and corporate shelters. It would also scale back the array of tax breaks and deductions known as tax expenditures, perhaps by focusing on the wealthiest households, which claim an average of $205,000 in tax breaks each year on average income of $1.1 million. The blueprint would take nearly $900 billion from the Pentagon over the next decade — the same amount recommended by Obama’s fiscal commission. It would slice more than $350 billion from domestic programs. And it would produce interest savings of nearly $600 billion attributable to reduced borrowing. A majority of Senate Democrats have approved of this proposal. Will it be considered “bold”, “courageous” and “innovative” by the Beltway media who used those terms with respect to Paul Ryan’s plan even as they held their nose over specific provisions? Doubtful. I’ll be amazed if it gets a fraction of the coverage Ryan’s plan received, despite the fact that every one of these bold proposals is supported by a majority of the American people. I’m already seeing a whole lot of negativity on the liberal side of the planet. Claims of ‘too little, too late’, that Conrad is just introducing a sweeping budget because he’s retiring in 2012, that no one will take these things seriously because they’ve been involved in talks for so long. I recommend looking at it differently. The President called for everyone to bring their bottom line deal to the table on Sunday. Conrad has just dropped the Democrats’ bottom line on the table, knowing full well that it will be unacceptable to every Republican in the room. So what? It would have been unacceptable to every Republican in the room two months ago, two days ago, two hours ago. It still delineates the differences between the two and sets a negotiating line that is far more to the left than the administration proposals (on purpose, by the way). The question at this point is not when Conrad brought his proposals to the table. The question is whether liberals, progressives, the left, whatever you want to call them, will use their formidable vocal skills to generate some buzz around these, since you can rest assured the so-called liberal media never will. The thing is, this week’s stupid news blurbs were all about one thing: Highlighting the fact that no matter how far Democrats would go to make a deal, there is no deal for the Republicans. After a week of that, Conrad laid down the budget most Democrats would view as one they could support and get behind. No one expects it to pass, any more than anyone thought Paul Ryan’s budget would pass. But Ryan has paid a high political price for introducing his wingnuttery early and often, and Republicans in the House have paid an even steeper one for voting for it, as they will continue to do in the future. This is all drama, all theater. Now that Republicans have shown themselves to be the party of ungovernance, Democrats step up with a set of proposals that actually reduces the deficit, preserves the social contract, and raises taxes on people who can afford it. Of course the Republicans aren’t going to bend to this, either. They weren’t going to bend to anything. So when nothing gets done, or some bandaid patch deal is done that doesn’t solve the longer-term issues, there will only be one party to blame and it won’t be Democrats.

Continue reading …
Howard Kurtz: Media Giving Republicans a Pass for Blocking Deficit Deal

As you've watched and read media reports concerning the debt ceiling, have you gotten the feeling the press have given Republicans a pass for standing strong in their pledge to not raise taxes? CNN's Howard Kurtz thinks they have, and said so quite often on Sunday's “Reliable Sources” (video follows with transcript and commentary): HOWARD KURTZ: Katrina vanden Heuvel, here’s David Brooks saying, “Republicans are not a normal Party.” Have most in the media been unwilling to point a finger and say the Republicans are largely responsible for blocking any deal here? That's some question to ask the editor and publisher of The Nation, America's most left-leaning major magazine. Of course, there's no need to bother sharing her answer. Care to guess what it was? Next, Kurtz pushed this line of thinking further with Newt Gingrich's former press secretary Tony Blankley: KURTZ: Tony Blankley, I’m not taking sides here. The Republicans have their standing on principle, but journalists could easily write that by saying we’ll negotiate anything except tax increases, which is of course half of the debate, Republicans are blocking progress toward a deal. Does Kurtz actually think they haven't been doing that? It was CNN contributor Donna Brazile's entire point on Sunday's “This Week.” The Associated Press made a similar case in its piece about the stalled negotiations Saturday evening, as did Mike Barnicle on MSNBC's “Morning Joe” Friday, the New York Times editorial board Friday , the Washington Post's Eugene Robinson Thursday , and NBC's David Gregory Thursday . For the past several weeks, virtually every media outlet has been incessantly blaming the lack of a deal on the Republicans and demanding they give in to tax hikes. Exactly what world has Kurtz been living in that he's missed this? Quite cluelessly, he continued pressing this absurd position with his guests: KURTZ: But on that point, Katrina, the Democrats have their own sacred cows. Medicare is one of them. It’s a great issue for the Democratic Party. But, President Obama has put nearly $500 billion in Medicare cuts on the table saying the Republicans should now give something on revenue. But, again, I don’t see the press, I think the press is so worried about appearing to take sides that they don’t want to say, “Well, the Democrats took another step here, and Republicans, and look Boehner is under a lot of pressure from his caucus, are still digging in.” “The press is so worried about appearing to take sides?” Not that that's what they're doing, but isn't it supposed to be? Kurtz – who claims to be a media analyst – is now complaining that the press are worried about taking sides. Look at the chyron that was at the bottom of the screen during most of this segment: GIVING REPUBLICANS A PASS? Media neutral on debt crisis Horrors! The media were neutral on a subject rather than taking sides! I guess that should have given his viewers all they needed to know about which side he was on concerning raising taxes. Maybe he was trying in one segment to compensate for this supposed “neutrality,” which is a heck of a position for a media analyst. Better for Kurtz to stop watching the press for a week and study the Historical Budgets of the United States in order to get a rudimentary understanding of why America is at this juncture. Since the Democrats took over Congress in 2007, spending has risen by $1.1 trillion or 41 percent. If we spent this year what we did in fiscal 2007, we'd only have a $160 billion deficit, which just so happens to be what the deficit was in the last budget created by Republicans and signed by George W. Bush. Even if spending had increased at the rate of inflation since 2007, today's deficit would only be $370 billion and we wouldn't be anywhere near the debt ceiling. As such, this matter isn't about tax receipts, tax rates, or tax loopholes. We've gotten ourselves into this crisis with reckless spending, and the only solution is to reduce it. Maybe if Kurtz was better informed about our historical budgets, he would be complaining that the media are devoting way too much time pushing for tax hikes and not enough time demanding more spending cuts. A conservative can dream, can't he?

Continue reading …
Protests spread in Egypt as discontent with military rule grows

Interim leader’s speech fails to convince protesters blocking off Cairo bureaucratic headquarters and road to Suez canal Protests have brought Egypt’s administrative and commercial nerve centres to a standstill , as government attempts to stem a growing wave of opposition to military rule succeeded only in galvanising demonstrators further. The interim prime minister, Essam Sharaf, took to the airwaves late on Saturday pledging to “meet the people’s demands”, following mass rallies across the country in which Egyptians accused the ruling council of army generals of betraying the revolution that toppled Hosni Mubarak this year . In a short and strained address to the nation, Sharaf said all police officers accused of killing protesters would be stopped from working, and promised that the trials of former Mubarak ministers and other regime officials would proceed “as soon as possible”. He insisted that social and economic problems would be reviewed by the army-appointed transitional cabinet. But activists dismissed the announcement as empty rhetoric and claimed it contained nothing substantive. “His speech sounded like one of these tricks of the old government,” Sherif, an engineer in his late 20s, told local news website Ahram Online. “If this government is unable to take serious steps, it should resign.” Several thousand people flocked to Cairo’s Tahrir Square after Sharaf’s speech. Anti-government activists have taken control of the roads there and an open-ended sit-in began on Friday. By Sunday morning, access to the Mugamma – a giant concrete building on one side of the square that serves as the bureaucratic heart of the Egyptian state – had been blocked off, with some employees reportedly joining the protests. In Suez, another focal point for political unrest, the families of some of those killed in the anti-Mubarak uprising helped protesters cut off the main highway between Cairo and Sokhna port, the main transit point for goods entering and leaving the Suez canal. The canal has also been targeted by strikes and protests in recent days, although officials insisted that international maritime traffic remained unaffected. Sharaf – a popular choice among revolutionaries when he was first appointed interim prime minister in March – has repeatedly claimed that he draws his legitimacy from Tahrir, and said again on Saturday that “the people” were the only sovereign power in Egypt. But analysts believe that the army generals have given him little control over policy and personnel decisions, and in recent weeks the 59-year-old has cut an increasingly frustrated figure in public. Egyptian newspapers used their Sunday editions to highlight the widening gap between the supreme council of the armed forces, which assumed power in the aftermath of Mubarak’s overthrow and has promised democratic elections before the end of the year, and large sections of the general public who believe that the pace of reform is too slow. “Protesters: Sharaf’s decisions are not enough — Calls for hunger strikes and civil disobedience,” stated the front-page headline in state-owned al-Ahram, the country’s biggest-selling daily. Al-Tahrir, a new Egyptian paper that emerged out of the revolution, splashed with a smiling photo of the country’s de facto leader, Field Marshall Mohamed Hussein Tantawi, under the words “The Marshall doesn’t respond.” Activists have called for another round of mass demonstrations on Tuesday. Egypt Arab and Middle East unrest Middle East Africa Jack Shenker guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …