Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 703)
In CA-36 Race, AP Ignores Democrat Hahn’s Gang-Intervention Scandal, TV Station Intimidation (See LAT-Related Update)

The Associated Press finally acknowledged the existence of Tuesday's competitive CA-36 special congressional election on Sunday afternoon. The winner will replace Democrat Jane Harman, who left Congress in February to head up the Woodrow Wilson Center. But as anyone who has followed the wire service's biases would expect, Political Writer Michael R. Blood's nearly 1000-word write-up (“GOP looks for upset in race for Calif. House seat”) totally ignored a serious controversy and related attempted thuggery involving Democrat Janice Hahn, whose opponent is Republican Craig Huey. It's fair to ask whether the AP's Blood withheld the incriminating information against Hahn in hopes of avoiding further harm to an already vulnerable liberal in what was originally supposed to be a cakewalk race. Details follow the jump. As seen below, in April 2008, a Fox 11 Los Angeles TV expose revealed that money targeted for gang-intervention programs “somehow” went, in the station's words, “to the gangsters themselves.” The TV station relayed an arrested gangster's claim that “Hahn helped him get out of jail.” Not long afterward, this particular gangster was sentenced to life in prison. Watch the video for full context and much, much more (warning: there is some R-rated language in this video and the one which follows): One might conceivably argue that a three year-old matter is old news, except for one thing: When Hahn learned that Fox 11 planned to air an update to that 2008 report, she had her attorneys send a cease and desist letter in an attempt to prevent the station from doing its follow-up story. That action by Hahn's people makes the entire matter election-related news by any reasonable journalistic standard. Here's Fox 11's video from last week, followed by excerpts from the station's related web page (bold is mine), which also contains the story's full script: Gang Intervention Money Controversy Not Over Yet The FOX 11 News investigation that's at the center of a heated political battle in the South Bay. Next week in a special election, voters will choose between Janice Hahn and Craig Huey for the 36th Congressional District. Huey supporters have been going door to door with copies of an investigation reported by our Chris Blatchford three years ago about Janice Hahn. Last week, Hahn's attorneys sent us a cease and desist demand to stop us from doing a followup story, but we've decided it's important to set the record straight. … Despite our repeated requests, we've received no comment from Janice Hahn herself for this story. According to the station, one gang member “sucked up more than a million dollar in city gang intervention funds, and is now in prison for selling illegal machine guns.” The bottom line per Fox 11: “Hahn was a driving force behind programs that got money to gang intervention workers.” The attempted intimidation by Janice Hahn is straight from the Democratic Party playbook for dealing with inconvenient truths (see John Kerry vs. the Swiftboat Vets , for starters). It is of course reasonable to believe that many voters would be turned off by such tactics — if they only knew. That's where Michael Blood comes in. Why shouldn't we believe that he ignored the controversy because he doesn't want the district's voters to be aware of Hahn's horrors? Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com . UPDATE, 2 AM ET: In the paper's Friday coverage of the debate between Hahn and Huey last week, Los Angeles Times reporter Jean Merl wrote: Also Thursday, fallout from a since-discredited Fox TV news report again roiled the campaign. An “update” of the controversy — stemming from allegations Hahn and the city of L.A. gave money to active gang members — featured a gang member saying Hahn had intervened on his behalf when he was arrested, plus a statement from a city attorney who asked not to be identified. From what I can determine, the liberal meme is that the report has been “discredited” because two police officers who claim they were fired because of their displeasure over the gang-intervention program lost their termination case against the city. That's irrelevant to whether the facts in Fox 11's stories are correct. From here, the “discredited” meme has the same stench as the damn-the-facts liberal belief that the Swiftboat Vets' claims about presidential candidate John Kerry were somehow “discredited.” The overwhelming bulk of those claims stand, as, it would appear, do Fox 11's, unless someone goes to the trouble of refuting the key facts in those stories.

Continue reading …

Intensity of blast at Evangelos Florakis navy base caused damage to nearby town but it remains unclear what triggered it A massive explosion has ripped through a military base in southern Cyprus with at least eight people reported dead, according to the official news agency. Information was scant from the scene of the blast at the Evangelos Florakis navy base. “There are a number of dead which we cannot confirm yet,” a spokesperson for the ministry of defence said. It was unclear what triggered the explosion, which news reports said took place in a munitions dump. The military base had munitions in storage which Cyprus had confiscated from the Monchegorsk, a vessel sailing from Iran to Syria in 2009. The intensity of the blast caused extensive damage to a neighbouring community, and in a holiday resort 3km from the site windows and doors of beachside restaurants were blown out. “The place looks like it was hit by a massive bomb,” a Reuters witness said. Further details soon. Cyprus Europe guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
India train crash death toll climbs to 60

Rescuers believe there are still more bodies in the wreckage of passenger train that derailed on Sunday afternoon Rescue workers have pulled more bodies from the mangled wreckage of a passenger train that derailed in northern India, as the death toll climbed to 60. Many more bodies were believed trapped under the twisted coaches, and soldiers were using gas cutters to slice through the metal, said Colonel Amarjit Dhillon, a senior army official in charge of rescue operations. The cause of Sunday afternoon’s derailment near the town of Fatehpur in Uttar Pradesh state was not immediately known, but newspaper reports said the driver of the Kalka Mail slammed on the train’s emergency brakes to avoid hitting cattle that had encroached onto the tracks. Railway authorities were investigating the cause of the accident, according to HC Joshi, a senior railway official. Volunteers and soldiers worked through the night to pull many of the more than 100 injured from the train’s 12 shattered coaches. Officials said the train was carrying about 1,000 passengers, but the exact number was not known. At least one coach flew above the roof of another and was balancing precariously while another coach was thrown away from the rest of the train. Dhillon said railway workers had hooked the coach to two cranes and were attempting to pull it clear. “It’s a difficult operation. Two cranes are being used to pull up the coach,” Dhillon said. Meanwhile, hundreds of miles to the north-east, police said a militant group was suspected of triggering a bomb that led to the derailment of a second train, also on Sunday. GP Singh, the police inspector-general, said little known group the Adivasi Peoples’ Army, was suspected to have triggered off the bomb. More than 50 passengers were injured when the train derailed, and the condition of four of them was critical, police said. India Rail transport guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
AP Covers CA-36 Race, But Ignores Democrat Hahn’s Gang-Intervention Scandal, TV Station Intimidation (See LAT-Related Update)

The Associated Press finally acknowledged the existence of Tuesday's competitive CA-36 special congressional election on Sunday afternoon. The winner will replace Democrat Jane Harman, who left Congress in February to head up the Woodrow Wilson Center. But as anyone who has followed the wire service's biases would expect, Political Writer Michael R. Blood's nearly 1000-word write-up (“GOP looks for upset in race for Calif. House seat”) totally ignored a serious controversy and related attempted thuggery involving Democrat Janice Hahn, whose opponent is Republican Craig Huey. It's fair to ask whether the AP's Blood withheld the incriminating information against Hahn in hopes of avoiding further harm to an already vulnerable liberal in what was originally supposed to be a cakewalk race. Details follow the jump. As seen below, in April 2008, a Fox 11 Los Angeles TV expose revealed that money targeted for gang-intervention programs “somehow” went, in the station's words, “to the gangsters themselves.” The TV station relayed an arrested gangster's claim that “Hahn helped him get out of jail.” Not long afterward, this particular gangster was sentenced to life in prison. Watch the video for full context and much, much more (warning: there is some R-rated language in this video and the one which follows): One might conceivably argue that a three year-old matter is old news, except for one thing: When Hahn learned that Fox 11 planned to air an update to that 2008 report, she had her attorneys send a cease and desist letter in an attempt to prevent the station from doing its follow-up story. That action by Hahn's people makes the entire matter election-related news by any reasonable journalistic standard. Here's Fox 11's video from last week, followed by excerpts from the station's related web page (bold is mine), which also contains the story's full script: Gang Intervention Money Controversy Not Over Yet The FOX 11 News investigation that's at the center of a heated political battle in the South Bay. Next week in a special election, voters will choose between Janice Hahn and Craig Huey for the 36th Congressional District. Huey supporters have been going door to door with copies of an investigation reported by our Chris Blatchford three years ago about Janice Hahn. Last week, Hahn's attorneys sent us a cease and desist demand to stop us from doing a followup story, but we've decided it's important to set the record straight. … Despite our repeated requests, we've received no comment from Janice Hahn herself for this story. According to the station, one gang member “sucked up more than a million dollar in city gang intervention funds, and is now in prison for selling illegal machine guns.” The bottom line per Fox 11: “Hahn was a driving force behind programs that got money to gang intervention workers.” The attempted intimidation by Janice Hahn is straight from the Democratic Party playbook for dealing with inconvenient truths (see John Kerry vs. the Swiftboat Vets , for starters). It is of course reasonable to believe that many voters would be turned off by such tactics — if they only knew. That's where Michael Blood comes in. Why shouldn't we believe that he ignored the controversy because he doesn't want the district's voters to be aware of Hahn's horrors? Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com . UPDATE, 2 AM ET: In the paper's Friday coverage of the debate between Hahn and Huey last week, Los Angeles Times reporter Jean Merl wrote: Also Thursday, fallout from a since-discredited Fox TV news report again roiled the campaign. An “update” of the controversy — stemming from allegations Hahn and the city of L.A. gave money to active gang members — featured a gang member saying Hahn had intervened on his behalf when he was arrested, plus a statement from a city attorney who asked not to be identified. From what I can determine, the liberal meme is that the report has been “discredited” because two police officers who claim they were fired because of their displeasure over the gang-intervention program lost their termination case against the city. That's irrelevant to whether the facts in Fox 11's stories are correct. From here, the “discredited” meme has the same stench as the damn-the-facts liberal belief that the Swiftboat Vets' claims about presidential candidate John Kerry were somehow “discredited.” The overwhelming bulk of those claims stand, as, it would appear, do Fox 11's, unless someone goes to the trouble of refuting the key facts in those stories.

Continue reading …
AP Covers CA-36 Race, But Ignores Democrat Hahn’s Gang-Intervention Scandal, TV Station Intimidation (See LAT-Related Update)

The Associated Press finally acknowledged the existence of Tuesday's competitive CA-36 special congressional election on Sunday afternoon. The winner will replace Democrat Jane Harman, who left Congress in February to head up the Woodrow Wilson Center. But as anyone who has followed the wire service's biases would expect, Political Writer Michael R. Blood's nearly 1000-word write-up (“GOP looks for upset in race for Calif. House seat”) totally ignored a serious controversy and related attempted thuggery involving Democrat Janice Hahn, whose opponent is Republican Craig Huey. It's fair to ask whether the AP's Blood withheld the incriminating information against Hahn in hopes of avoiding further harm to an already vulnerable liberal in what was originally supposed to be a cakewalk race. Details follow the jump. As seen below, in April 2008, a Fox 11 Los Angeles TV expose revealed that money targeted for gang-intervention programs “somehow” went, in the station's words, “to the gangsters themselves.” The TV station relayed an arrested gangster's claim that “Hahn helped him get out of jail.” Not long afterward, this particular gangster was sentenced to life in prison. Watch the video for full context and much, much more (warning: there is some R-rated language in this video and the one which follows): One might conceivably argue that a three year-old matter is old news, except for one thing: When Hahn learned that Fox 11 planned to air an update to that 2008 report, she had her attorneys send a cease and desist letter in an attempt to prevent the station from doing its follow-up story. That action by Hahn's people makes the entire matter election-related news by any reasonable journalistic standard. Here's Fox 11's video from last week, followed by excerpts from the station's related web page (bold is mine), which also contains the story's full script: Gang Intervention Money Controversy Not Over Yet The FOX 11 News investigation that's at the center of a heated political battle in the South Bay. Next week in a special election, voters will choose between Janice Hahn and Craig Huey for the 36th Congressional District. Huey supporters have been going door to door with copies of an investigation reported by our Chris Blatchford three years ago about Janice Hahn. Last week, Hahn's attorneys sent us a cease and desist demand to stop us from doing a followup story, but we've decided it's important to set the record straight. … Despite our repeated requests, we've received no comment from Janice Hahn herself for this story. According to the station, one gang member “sucked up more than a million dollar in city gang intervention funds, and is now in prison for selling illegal machine guns.” The bottom line per Fox 11: “Hahn was a driving force behind programs that got money to gang intervention workers.” The attempted intimidation by Janice Hahn is straight from the Democratic Party playbook for dealing with inconvenient truths (see John Kerry vs. the Swiftboat Vets , for starters). It is of course reasonable to believe that many voters would be turned off by such tactics — if they only knew. That's where Michael Blood comes in. Why shouldn't we believe that he ignored the controversy because he doesn't want the district's voters to be aware of Hahn's horrors? Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com . UPDATE, 2 AM ET: In the paper's Friday coverage of the debate between Hahn and Huey last week, Los Angeles Times reporter Jean Merl wrote: Also Thursday, fallout from a since-discredited Fox TV news report again roiled the campaign. An “update” of the controversy — stemming from allegations Hahn and the city of L.A. gave money to active gang members — featured a gang member saying Hahn had intervened on his behalf when he was arrested, plus a statement from a city attorney who asked not to be identified. From what I can determine, the liberal meme is that the report has been “discredited” because two police officers who claim they were fired because of their displeasure over the gang-intervention program lost their termination case against the city. That's irrelevant to whether the facts in Fox 11's stories are correct. From here, the “discredited” meme has the same stench as the damn-the-facts believe that the Swiftboat Vets claims about presidential candidate John Kerry were somehow “discredited.” The overwhelming bulk of those claims stand, as, it would appear, do Fox 11's, unless someone goes to the trouble of refuting the key facts in those stories.

Continue reading …
The Crucial Question David Gregory and Bob Schieffer Didn’t Ask Timothy Geithner Sunday

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner was the featured guest on both CBS's “Face the Nation” and NBC's “Meet the Press” Sunday. For some reason, hosts Bob Schieffer and David Gregory didn't ask the most important question every person in the world currently following the debt ceiling is dying to know the answer to: Are there enough tax revenues coming in during August to cover whatever costs are associated with our Treasury bonds, notes, and bills so that America doesn't default on its debt if the ceiling isn't raised? Pretty simple question, right? It's also a pretty simple answer: Yes or no. Wouldn't take a lot of time, and it would settle the disagreement that Democrats and Republicans have on this crucial issue. As you likely know, the Left and their media minions claim that the only way to prevent a default on our Treasury paper is to raise the debt ceiling. The Right, on the other hand, believes there is more than enough in tax receipts to cover such outlays. NewsBusters reported Thursday the Treasury is expecting $172 billion in tax receipts next month. From what I can estimate based on Treasury data from this and previous years, it is unlikely that August interest payments will exceed $35 billion, thereby leaving $137 billion for other bills such as Social Security, Medicare, and military salaries. Yet, this didn't surface during a 16-minute interview Geithner had with Gregory Sunday. Here's the relevant section: DAVID GREGORY: All right, now, the specific consequences of inaction and potential default, that August 2 date is coming. You know, this is a big issue not only in Congress , but also among those running for president or perhaps running for president. Sarah Palin gave an interview to Newsweek , and she says, “Look, this debt limit business, this is not the apocalypse here.” I'm asking you, specific consequences to the United States of getting to August 2 without raising the debt limit. SEC'Y GEITHNER: Let me make this clear , David . The United States is not going to default. We are a country that pays its bills. We're going to meet our obligations. And the leadership in Congress , Republicans and Democrats , House and Senate , understand that. Speaker Boehner , to his credit, said from the beginning we are not going to default as a country because he understands it would be catastrophic for the American economy . So let me explain what happens. The longer we go into July, the more risk there will be in financial markets , more concern the risk that America cannot get its act together to figure out how to solve this problem. And you'll see that reflected in higher interest rates and more concerned loss of confidence. And let me explain what happens on August 2 . On August 2 , at that point we run out of the ability to borrow to meet our obligations. Remember, we spend — we have to borrow now 40 cents for every dollar we spend. Now, on August 2 , if Congress hasn't acted, we're left with the cash we have and the cash we're going to take in. And every week starting the week of August 2 , we have to go out and finance roughly $100 billion in maturing obligations of the government. We make 80 million checks a month to Americans , 55 million people on Social Security benefits , millions more Americans on veterans benefits , Medicare , Medicaid , people who supply our troops in combat. Eighty million checks a month. So on August 2 , we're left with the cash on hand and the cash we take in. And we have to convince people to come and refinance $500 billion in maturing principal payments that come due in August MR. GREGORY: Does that affect our credit rating potentially? SEC'Y GEITHNER: Absolutely. And for that reason the credit rating agencies around the world have said if Congress doesn't act by the 2nd they will put our — they will downgrade our credit, first time in history, and if that happens, you're going to see catastrophic damage across the American economy and across the global economy . It's not something we — failure is not an option and the leaders to their credit — the leaders to their credit understand this. MR. GREGORY: But that's a… SEC'Y GEITHNER: And let me just say… MR. GREGORY: Yeah. SEC'Y GEITHNER: …there is no credible way to give Congress more time. There's no constitutional option . There's no delay option. There's no creative financial option. They have to act by the 2nd. MR. GREGORY: It's a significant consequence that you're outlining here that America 's credit rating could be downgraded without a deal by August 2nd . SEC'Y GEITHNER: And it's much worse than that. Again, just remember, that, that itself would be very damaging… MR. GREGORY: Mm-hmm. SEC'Y GEITHNER: …because that will affect the cost of cost……for all Americans , the value of all American savings , the capacity of businesses to borrow to put people more back to work. But remember, 80 million checks a month we write, including people who depend on those checks to go out and buy food to meet their basic needs. MR. GREGORY: Who would you pick first? SEC'Y GEITHNER: This is not a — this… MR. GREGORY: Would you have to make that decision? SEC'Y GEITHNER: There's no alternative for Congress to act by the 2nd, and they recognize it, and I'm very confident they're going to do that. I think what we're debating, David , is not really that. What we're debating is, can we take advantage of this moment, of this opportunity , grave moment facing the nation to try to get our arms around those long-term fiscal problems in a way that is good for the economy. Notice that Gregory never asked Geithner how much revenue he expected to come in next month, or exactly how much it would take to cover all associated debt costs so that it wouldn't have to be defaulted on. Shouldn't this have been the pivotal, most important question to ask the man responsible for such things? How could this not have been asked in sixteen minutes of questioning? Ask yourself which is more important: that Geithner has to write 80 million checks next month, or how much they total, and how much of it is directly related to our debt? It's the kind of question that large corporations, small businesses, and heads of households have to answer whenever their credit lines have maxed out and no bank is willing to lend them more money. What income do we expect in the next 30 days, and exactly how much will we have to pay which creditors in order to keep the company/household from having to file bankruptcy? Regardless of what the Left and their media minions are claiming, it is indeed that simple. If he was at all aware of budgets and finances, Gregory should have also asked why the $500 billion in maturing principal payments was relevant. It is my understanding that much of this $500 billion are short maturity T-bills that will likely get rolled over by those currently holding them. Whatever isn't can be raised through new auctions that don't add to the current debt limit as they'd be replacing existing debt. There is some fear in the markets that the closer we get to August 2nd, the more we might have to pay for such transactions, but with T-bills currently yielding between 0.01 and 0.20 percent depending on maturity, this seems hardly to be a concern. So why didn't Gregory bring any of this up? Is it because this issue is really over his head, and he's totally unqualified to be interviewing the Treasury Secretary? Or would the answers to such questions reveal that there is currently no risk of a debt default because there's far more coming into Treasury in the form of taxes each month than our total debt expense just as the Right is claiming? As for Schieffer, he spoke with Geithner for thirteen minutes Sunday, and was equally hapless: BOB SCHIEFFER: Let me ask you this, Mr. Secretary. While these negotiations go on, what about these Republicans who say it's just scare tactics, about doomsday if we don't raise the debt ceiling? Tell me what happens if you don't raise the debt ceiling. GEITHNER: Well, let's start with this, okay. As we go into July, further into July, the world is going to be progressively more concerned about whether this town, this city, Washington, D.C., can figure out a way to solve this problem. So the risk we face starts to happen in July. But then on August 2, we're left running on fumes. We have no capacity to borrow. I have to write 80 million checks a month to Americans including 55 million Americans who depend on their Social Security check. We have to make principal payments or rollover $500 billion in debt in the month of August. About 87 billion in that first week in august. And so for those reasons, we have to act, Congress has to act ahead of that point. If they don't act, then we face catastrophic damage to the American economy. And the leadership, to their credit — and I mean Republicans and Democrats — fully understand that. And they have been very clear to the President and to me, including last Thursday, that they are not going to take that risk. SCHIEFFER: So, so is August 2 the drop-dead date? GEITHNER: Oh, absolutely. We've looked at all options, all options my predecessors have looked at, everything past presidents have looked at, and there is no feasible option to give Congress more time, and they don't need to take more time. Once again, Geithner was allowed to spew the Party line without having to address how much the tax receipts will be and exactly what the costs associated with servicing our debt are. This should have been paramount in both these discussions Sunday, but neither Gregory nor Schieffer bothered to ask the most important question on the minds of Americans and investors the world over. That our nation's Treasury Secretary was allowed to face almost 30 minutes of questioning Sunday without either of these moderators asking the most important question of all is what John Ziegler calls media malpractice. It is exactly this kind of negligence that keeps Americans from fully understanding our budgetary, economic, and financial affairs. If this is just a matter of ignorance on their part, then someone more qualified should be brought in for such interviews. If, on the other hand, these questions were intentionally avoided to prevent the public from better understanding the actual risks associated with not raising the debt ceiling, then neither of these gentlemen should be in the position of trust and responsibility he's currently in. Whatever the reason, Messrs. Gregory and Schieffer should be ashamed of themselves for having so let their nation down Sunday.

Continue reading …

See if you can count how many times Christiane Amanpour and Co. repeat right-wing tropes and/or Villager conventional wisdom! I managed to watch this morning without breaking my TV, even though I badly wanted to. First of all, no discussion whatsoever of the fact that John Boehner has said, on the record, that the new Republican congress freshmen understand that they have to raise the debt ceiling . That’s a pretty significant omission, since the entire rationale for this debt-ceiling hysteria arises from the absurd idea that a Republican House is going to kick Wall Street in the nuts . How likely do you think that is? Can I get an amen? There is no spending crisis. This is an elaborate game . Now, onto the show. The main theme today is “no way can this be done without entitlement reform.” Oh, and kicking the Democratic leaders for standing in the way of the Grand Bargain. “Why oh why does that dumb Nancy Pelosi continue to oppose the idea of using the poor as human shields? What a bitch .” I lost it at the point when I heard the comfortably wealthy Donna Brazile say, “You can’t cut programs that affect the middle class, senior citizens and people with disabilities without putting revenues on the table!” Never a word about the appalling idea of actually hurting those people, people Democrats used to protect – just annoyance with the Republicans for not buying the deal. (Oh, and by the way? I’ll give you a dime for every time you can show me a prominent Democrat who went in TV and talked about the poor in the past year. Yes, actual poor people, not the “middle class” talking point they pound like a drum.) George Will? No one listens to him except the other panelists. He’s useful only as a barometer of Village conventional wisdom, since he hasn’t had an original thought in decades — probably since his then-wife threw his self-righteous, adulterous ass out of her house and his clothes on the lawn. Also: White House chief of staff Bill Daley says Obama “still wants a big deal.” Oy.

Continue reading …
Lightning Strike Rattles N.J. Senate President on Live TV

We know New Jersey governor Chris Christie has veto power, but is it possible his powers stretch into the supernatural? We kid, but it’s pretty eerie that as New Jersey Senate president Stephen Sweeney was speaking about his beef with Governor Christie, a lightning bolt struck dangerously close to where he was standing. (PHOTOS: Republicans

Continue reading …
DeMint: Geithner ‘playing Chicken Little’ on the debt ceiling

Click here to view this media Tea party favorite Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) said Sunday that there was no risk of “major economic consequences” if the debt limit was not raised by Aug. 2. “I think the president has been gaming Republicans,” DeMint told Fox News’ Bret Baier. “He has been talking about this for six months. The only proposal he sent us is his budget to raise the debt $10 trillion. So it’s hard to take him seriously here.” “Thousands of Americans and many Republicans in Congress are uniting around the idea that we will give the president his increase in the debt limit in return for some reasonable cuts in spending this year, some caps on spending over the next ten years, his agreement to send balanced budget amendment to the Constitution, to the states for them to ratify,” he added. “Do you believe, Senator, that the country risks default or major economic consequences if the debt ceiling is not raised on August 2nd — by August 2nd?” Baier asked. “No, I don’t,” DeMint insisted. “I think [Treasury] Secretary Geithner has been irresponsible. He’s playing Chicken Little here.” “We will pay the debts if it’s the last dollar we have. There are enough assets in Social Security and Medicare to pay the benefits of those programs for several years. Other programs can be funded from tax revenue. There would certainly be disruption, Bret, but this is not a deadline we should rush and make a bad deal and do something that cuts benefits from seniors without giving them better choices.” Baier pressed the South Carolina Republican on House Speaker John Boehner’s (R-OH) claim that the economy would be in ” jeopardy ” if the debt ceiling wasn’t raised by Aug. 2. “Well, if the president and Secretary Geithner have not planned for contingencies — and we have sent them letters to tell them they needed to — there would certainly be disruption. But the president is required by law to pay our debts. He is required to pay Social Security and Medicare,” DeMint said.

Continue reading …
DeMint: Geithner ‘playing Chicken Little’ on the debt ceiling

Click here to view this media Tea party favorite Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) said Sunday that there was no risk of “major economic consequences” if the debt limit was not raised by Aug. 2. “I think the president has been gaming Republicans,” DeMint told Fox News’ Bret Baier. “He has been talking about this for six months. The only proposal he sent us is his budget to raise the debt $10 trillion. So it’s hard to take him seriously here.” “Thousands of Americans and many Republicans in Congress are uniting around the idea that we will give the president his increase in the debt limit in return for some reasonable cuts in spending this year, some caps on spending over the next ten years, his agreement to send balanced budget amendment to the Constitution, to the states for them to ratify,” he added. “Do you believe, Senator, that the country risks default or major economic consequences if the debt ceiling is not raised on August 2nd — by August 2nd?” Baier asked. “No, I don’t,” DeMint insisted. “I think [Treasury] Secretary Geithner has been irresponsible. He’s playing Chicken Little here.” “We will pay the debts if it’s the last dollar we have. There are enough assets in Social Security and Medicare to pay the benefits of those programs for several years. Other programs can be funded from tax revenue. There would certainly be disruption, Bret, but this is not a deadline we should rush and make a bad deal and do something that cuts benefits from seniors without giving them better choices.” Baier pressed the South Carolina Republican on House Speaker John Boehner’s (R-OH) claim that the economy would be in ” jeopardy ” if the debt ceiling wasn’t raised by Aug. 2. “Well, if the president and Secretary Geithner have not planned for contingencies — and we have sent them letters to tell them they needed to — there would certainly be disruption. But the president is required by law to pay our debts. He is required to pay Social Security and Medicare,” DeMint said.

Continue reading …