I've been trying to resist taking satisfaction in David Cay Johnston's utter humiliation on his first assignment at Reuters. Y'know, there but for the grace of God, etc. I do wish him well, though I question whether the feeling is mutual. More important, I hope he recognizes the need to go into journalistic rehab. My guess is that he doesn't. The former New York Times journalist/reporter (whatever, David) and yours truly had an extended online dustup four years ago when I demonstrated Johnston's in my view sloppy, foundation-limited, and biased reporting at the Old Gray Lady
Continue reading …enlarge Alan Caruba is featured all the time on Tea Party Nation. What distinguishes Caruba’s screeds from others are two characteristics: They are always mean-spirited with racist overtones and they are always hysterical. Today’s little rant (again, no link because they’re behind a registration wall, but it is a direct copy/paste) has a very, very interesting declaration: How did the United States of America go from Thomas Jefferson, the brilliant author of the Declaration of Independence to Timothy Geithner, a very upwardly mobile student of government and monetary affairs? Suffice to say, as a public servant, he has served to the satisfaction of his mentors in numerous positions and also in liberal enclaves such as the Council on Foreign Affairs and a three-year stint at Kissinger Associates, learning from one of the most Machiavellian characters of the modern era. At the tender age of 42, he was named president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The liberal elite take care of its own. Geithner is the ying to Obama’s yang. They are perfectly suited to each other because both get their jollies playing the great game of state, although it should be said that Geithner is far better prepared for that role having studied abroad, including two years, 1981-2 studying Mandarin at Peking University and Beijing Normal University. His M.A. is in international economics and Asian studies from John Hopkins University School of advanced International Studies. Obama’s education ended with a law degree from Harvard. Nobody knows what grades he made at Occidental, Columbia University or Harvard. He is often mistakenly referred to as a former professor of constitutional law at Chicago University, but in fact he was akin to a teaching assistant or adjunct, the lowest end of the academic ladder. Obama’s mentors included a known member of the Communist Party when he was growing up in Hawaii, various “Marxist professors” at Occidental and Columbia University, and Bill Ayers who gained fame as a domestic terrorist, a member of the Weather Underground who describes himself as a “Communist with a small c.” To bring matters full circle, Ayers is a retired University of Chicago professor. All this is by way of background to suggest that the debt ceiling will be increased because there is no alternative. And having surrendered, he spent the rest of the post smacking around Democrats, but it was halfhearted at best. I call that *winning*. Unfortunately, Charles Krauthammer is a little bit aggravated, but even he concedes they’ve lost the battle and the war. The Republicans are being totally outmaneuvered. The House speaker appears disoriented. It’s time to act. Time to call Obama’s bluff. A long-term deal or nothing? The Republican House should immediately pass a short-term debt-ceiling hike of $500 billion containing $500 billion in budget cuts. That would give us about five months to work on something larger. Aw, Charles. What part of President Obama’s “I-have-reached-my-limit” statement did you miss yesterday? Possibly, it was the part where he said he would not sign anything short-term. Because, as Lawrence O’Donnell explained on The Last Word last night, the President can veto that short-term thing at midnight on August 2nd and Congress will still have time to give him the one line increase resolution with the right numbers filled in. He is, however, right about the Republicans being outmaneuvered. They have been.
Continue reading …Colin and Chris Weir from Ayrshire win £161m – UK’s biggest ever jackpot When you have just discovered that you are as rich as Croesus, a small toast is in order. So, in the early hours of Wednesday, Chris Weir broke the habit of a lifetime and cracked open a bottle of wine. “I don’t even drink, so that shows you how excited we were,” said Weir, 55, a former psychiatric nurse, as she and her husband, Colin, 64, revealed themselves as the UK’s biggest ever lottery winners with Tuesday’s EuroMillions jackpot of £161m safe in their bank. Initially, they had not wanted to go public with their win. But they realised that they would have had to tell lies and hide their news from those around them, and they wanted to be able to enjoy the moment and all that it meant. “We are not flashy people,” said Chris. “We are not celebrities and we hope that once we have shared our good news we will get some time to go back to being us.” The retired couple from Largs, in Ayrshire, now better off than the Marquess of Bath, and just a few million short of David and Victoria Beckham’s vast fortune, said they were still struggling to come to terms with their newfound wealth but were not daunted by it. “We are not afraid of this,” said Chris. “It seems mammoth; it seems absolutely fantastical. When I woke up on Tuesday morning everything was ordinary. I woke up on Wednesday morning and the whole world was totally different for us … We’re not scared of it. It’s going to be fantastic and it’s going to be so much fun.” The Weirs’ £161m prize, the biggest ever in the EuroMillions draw, came after a series of rollovers. The previous biggest winner, also from the UK, scooped £113m in October and chose to stay anonymous. The prize is 50% more than the amount Scotland collects in taxes every month and equivalent to 0.16% of Scotland’s GDP. Married for 30 years, the Weirs have both suffered from ill-health and appeared in front of the press yesterday at a hotel near Falkirk walking with the aid of sticks. For many years, Colin was a carer for his wife. Their two adult children, Carly, 24, a photography student, and Jamie, 22, who works at a call centre, were also stunned by the win. Unable until now to afford their own cars, both offspring have signed up for driving lessons. The Weirs plan to buy their children homes, and Chris will replace her Suzuki car. Colin, however, is happy with his old car because it is reliable and he does not see the need for a new one. A keen football fan who follows Barcelona, he may see fit to get a box at the Camp Nou stadium to watch his team play. They plan to travel. The Great Wall of China, Uluru – formerly Ayers Rock – in Australia, Cambodia and Taiwan are first on their list. They like their three-bedroom villa in Largs with its nice views, so have no immediate plans to move, but would consider a second or maybe even third home. They realise, said Chris, that their great wealth brings them great responsibility, and plan to use some of the money for good causes. “There are things that we are passionate about but we need to temper that with looking at what is the best way to do the most good,” she said. “We need to do that in a measured, planned way. It would be very easy to throw money at people. “I worked in the public sector all my life and I know what distress people have. I want to do things in a way where the benefit goes to the people who really need it.” Although regular players of the lottery, the Weirs did not watch the lottery programme on Tuesday evening, but Chris checked the numbers at midnight on her way to bed. Out of five lucky dip lines, the fifth was the winner. She checked it numerous times, and Colin did likewise, unable to believe what they were seeing. “The Camelot line was closed for the evening but we couldn’t sleep,” said Chris. “We sat up. We were so buzzed. We were so full of adrenaline we couldn’t sleep. We couldn’t really do anything except sit. We talked to each other about how absolutely amazing this was. We were tickled pink with the whole notion of winning so much money.” National Lottery Scotland Kirsty Scott guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Across the Arab world, protesters show fury at the resistance to change shown by interim authorities as well as old regimes The historic revolutions that have rippled through the Arab world this year were in danger of eclipse on Friday night as protesters returned to the streets to profess their disgust at how the movement is being stymied by regimes old and new. Six months after the Arab spring claimed its first dictator, the main squares of Cairo and Tunis were again alive with protest, teargas and fury at the resistance to change shown by interim authorities. In Syria activists said at least 19 people had been killed in the latest crackdown against protests that have convulsed the country for more than four months. At least seven people were killed in Yemen amid a political limbo that appears no closer to resolution. And in Jordan a heavy security presence policed pro- and anti-reform demonstrations which turned violent. The scenes served as a reminder that following the euphoria of the Arab spring, little concrete progress towards reform has been made. Elections in Tunisia and Egypt have been postponed. Offers of reform in Yemen and Syria have been rejected as inadequate. Egypt Thousands of demonstrators descended on public squares around the country to offer a “Friday of final warning” to the ruling military junta, amid fears that the revolution which toppled Hosni Mubarak is being betrayed by conservative forces. Rallies and hunger strikes were reported from Alexandria on the Mediterranean coast all the way down to Luxor in the south and Suez in the east, with the main focus once again on Cairo’s Tahrir Square where a large sit-in is now over a week old and shows no sign of ending. Protesters accused the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF), which assumed power in the aftermath of Mubarak’s fall and promised to make way for a democratically-elected civilian government later this year, of stifling revolutionary demands and working to shield elements of the old regime from grassroots political change. “As many have been saying on Facebook, the relationship between the people and SCAF is the same as the relationship between a wife and a husband who she knows is being unfaithful,” said Shady Alaa El Din, a demonstrator in Tahrir. “She tolerated it at first in an effort not to destroy the family and hurt the children, but eventually she realised the husband doesn’t really care about the family at all, so now she has dropped her act and is taking him on directly,” he added. “At first we lied to ourselves, we wanted to believe they were with us. But now the street has woken up and it is saying to SCAF ‘we are the rulers, and you follow our orders – not the other way round. We are the fucking red line, you do not cross us.’” In common with most protesters, El Din was infuriated this week by an address from SCAF spokesman General Mohsen El-Fangari, in which he warned against those seeking to “disrupt public order” and adopted a tone reminiscent of Mubarak in his final speeches to the nation. Pressure is now mounting on interim prime minister Essam Sharaf, who appears unable or unwilling to force through meaningful policy changes in the face of the generals’ intransigence and is now being urged to resign by many of his original supporters. Tunisia For anyone new to the Tunisian capital, it was almost as though the past six months had never happened. Balaclava-wearing riot police armed with batons, teargas launchers and dogs squared up against a small crowd of demonstrators who had gathered to express a sentiment widely felt in the city: that the revolution has run into the sand, stymied by a caretaker administration that they say has done little to implement revolutionaries’ demands. The central government square or Qasbah was protected by coils of barbed wire and armoured vehicles, as demonstrators waving Tunisian flags chanted “peaceful, peaceful”. Then the trouble started. The first gas canister spewed a thick white smoke and was quickly followed by many others. Protesters ran for cover into dark shadows against a white gas screen. Two men held their ground, kneeling bare-chested and facing the charging police. A third stopped a canister that whirled past, picked it up and threw it back at police lines. As the fumes dispersed, the demonstrators returned, their numbers now swelled into the hundreds. Some began pelting police with small rocks. “The people who tortured me are still there,” said Malek Khudaira pointing at the ministry where he was held for 10 days during the uprising that toppled the former dictator Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali. “How can I feel there is change and it’s a full revolution if everything is the same, I see those torturers walking in the streets every day.” For hours a game of attack and counter attacked ensued. Demonstrators would march, police would fire hails of canisters into their midst. One man in black trousers, white shirt and sunglasses stood facing the police when they fired a small canister point blank at his belly. He fell where he stood. Others helped him away. The organisers labelled the event as “the Qasbah 3″. Number 1 was the uprising that toppled Ben Ali and forced him to flee and number 2 was the sit-in that toppled the first caretaker government a month later. Syria Activists reported at least 19 deaths across Syria and dozens of injuries as people gathered for the main weekly prayers, which have been used as a launching pad for dissent for more than four months. Heavy clashes took place in parts of the capital, according to activists and state media, who offered widely diverging accounts. At least seven protesters were shot dead in neighbourhoods of Damascus as some of the largest crowds since the uprising poured on to the streets. Security forces have generally used batons and teargas in Damascus to avoid inflaming protests in the heartland of the regime’s power. Elsewhere, scores of wounded were reported in the cities of Aleppo, Deraa, Idleb and Homs. Syrian officials again blamed armed gangs for the violence – an indirect reference to Islamists who it claims are trying to ignite sectarian chaos. However, activists said unarmed demonstrators were again attacked by soldiers firing live rounds. The use of violence has been unpredictable, changing by week and location. In Homs, one resident in the well-off neighbourhood of Inshaat said security forces appeared to be trying to avoid deaths. “They have been shooting but seemed to be aiming at the legs rather that the heads.” Two of the biggest protests took place in Hama and Deir Ezzor, on a day when activists estimated that up to 1 million people may have openly defied the regime nationwide. Jordan Ten people, mostly journalists, were injured on Fridaywhen Jordanian police tried to intervene in clashes between pro-reform demonstrators and government supporters in Amman. Hundreds of protesters calling for political changes and an end to corruption gathered in the centre of the capital but it was not clear whether they would ignore official warnings against holding a sit-in of the types seen in Egypt and Bahrain. Jordan has seen sporadic unrest since January but only on a small scale. Opposition demands – supported by youth groups, civil society organisations and Islamists – are for changes within the framework of the Hashemite monarchy. King Abdullah has pledged to pursue reforms that would allow the formation of future governments based on an elected parliamentary majority but gave no date. The slogan “the people want the reform of the regime” was in striking and deliberate contrast to demands elsewhere for the “overthrow” of rulers. The Amman protest was held with a heavy security presence, with police, gendarmerie and special forces surrounding the area, the Ammon News website reported. Rallies for reform and against “rampant corruption” also drew hundreds of demonstrators in the southern cities of Tafileh, Maan and Karak, and in Irbid and Jerash in the north. Arab and Middle East unrest Egypt Middle East Africa Tunisia Syria Jordan Ghaith Abdul-Ahad Jack Shenker Martin Chulov Ian Black guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Royal Brompton says plans to reduce the number of hospitals carrying out children’s heart surgery are ‘fundamentally flawed’ The Royal Brompton hospital in London has won permission for a judicial review of what it argues are “fundamentally flawed” NHS plans that threaten to close its children’s heart surgery unit. The hospital stands to lose its unit under proposals to reduce the numbers of hospitals carrying out children’s heart surgery from 11 to six or seven. Experts agree that children will be safer if heart surgery is concentrated in fewer, larger units where surgeons are more experienced. But the proposals put forward by the “Safe and Sustainable” NHS review, run by a joint committee representing all primary care trusts, have outraged the Royal Brompton, which is one of three hospitals in London undertaking this very specialised surgery and the only one earmarked for closure in the capital. Their services would be merged into those of Great Ormond Street and the Evelina children’s hospital. The Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust has now been granted permission to proceed to a full judicial review later this year by Mr Justice Burnett at the high court. It argues that the process leading to the public consultation (which has just ended) on a number of different closure options was fundamentally flawed. “This is extremely good news, first and foremost for patients,” said Bob Bell, chief executive of the trust. “We have always supported the principle that all babies and children who undergo heart surgery deserve the best possible care, but decisions about the future of such vital services have to be made on the basis of sound, objective evidence and the decision-making process must, of course, be entirely transparent. These conditions were not met by those responsible for this review.” However, the trust did not succeed in getting the reorganisation stopped in its tracks. Mr Justice Burnett said it “is desirable for the joint committee to continue its work of improving paediatric cardiac surgery for the nation”. It was with “some hesitation” that he agreed that the Brompton had an arguable case, he said. The Brompton claims that the decision to reduce London centres from three to two was not based on any evidence, but was an attempt to ensure London shared “the pain of closure” with other units around the country. The trust also argues that it was not represented on the decision-making body, while the other two London centres were. It says its results are very good and that closure of the heart unit would have a damaging impact on its other services, including adult heart surgery. Hospital reorganisation plans are invariably hard fought and the Brompton is not the only centre to campaign against the proposed closure of its children’s heart surgery unit, but it is the only one to take legal action. Others have sent in mass petitions and MPs from Leeds succeeded in obtaining a debate on the floor of the House of Commons. There have been 70,000 responses to the public consultation exercise, including 20,000 text messages. Jeremy Glyde, programme director for Safe and Sustainable, said: “The rationale for change is supported by medical experts, professional associations and leading national heart charities. Pooling expertise will help the NHS make further improvements to patient outcomes and deliver a truly excellent service.” An independent panel would now look into the Brompton’s claim that other services would be damaged if the children’s heart unit closed, Glyde said. NHS Public sector cuts Health Public services policy Public finance Sarah Boseley guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …We all know by now that legislation usually means the opposite of its title — in this case, the PROTECT IP Act. Instead, this too-broad, badly-written bill will stifle freedom of expression and make unintended criminals out of many of us. Imagine becoming a felon simply by streaming ten YouTube videos! If you want to oppose this legislation, click here to sign the petition. From the Electronic Freedom Foundation: Last year’s rogue website legislation is back on the table, with a new name: the “Preventing Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property Act of 2011″—or (wink, wink) “PROTECT IP”. The draft language is available here. The earlier bill , which failed to pass thanks largely to a hold on the legislation placed by Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon, would have given the government dramatic new copyright enforcement powers targeted at websites “dedicated to infringing activities,” even where those websites were not based in the United States. Despite some salient differences (described below) in the new version, we are no less dismayed by this most recent incarnation than we were with last year’s draft. First, the legislation now includes a private right of action for intellectual property owners. This means that IP owners as well as the government can seek injunctions against websites “dedicated to infringing activities” in addition to court orders against third parties providing services to those sites. (Notably, IP owners can also bring actions to enforce the court orders.) Consider whether Viacom would have bothered to bring a copyright infringement action against YouTube—with the attendant challenges of arguing around the DMCA safe harbors—had it had this cause of action in its arsenal. The act includes language that says it’s not intended to “enlarge or diminish” the DMCA’s safe harbor limitations on liability, but make no mistake: rights holders will argue that safe harbor qualification is simply immaterial if a site is deemed to be dedicated to infringement. Second, the scope of the language has been expanded to include additional categories of third-party providers that can be subject to court orders. Under the new act, “interactive computer services” and “servers of sponsored links” can be required to cease linking to particular websites. We’d heard about a potential “search engine provision,” but these additions arguably go much further. An interactive computer service (the term, and its definition, are borrowed from the Communications Decency Act ) could include not only Bing but also sites like Facebook, Twitter, and potentially any service or web page where a URL might turn up. Update: An official Senate version of the draft PROTECT IP Act has been released and is available here . This version changes the “interactive computer services” language mentioned in our post below to “information location tools,” a term that points back to section 512(d) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. In that context it’s been generally understood to refer to search engines, though there’s no guarantee we wouldn’t see efforts to expand the definition in actions under this bill. But in any case, requiring search engines to remove links to an entire website raises serious First Amendment concerns considering the lawful expression that may be hosted on the same domain.
Continue reading …Pegah Ahangarani, a supporter of the country’s opposition, was due to go to Germany to participate in TV coverage A popular Iranian actor and outspoken supporter of the country’s opposition movement has been arrested in Tehran after attempting to travel to Germany to take part in coverage of the women’s World Cup. Pegah Ahangarani, 27, was scheduled to go to Germany to participate in TV programmes about the Fifa tournament, but was picked up from her home in the capital by security officials on Sunday. Ahangarani fell foul of the Islamic regime when she publicly campaigned for opposition leader Mir Hossein Mousavi in Iran’s 2009 presidential elections, but escaped arrest until recently because of her widespread popularity. She is the second woman to have been arrested in recent weeks in connection with the women’s World Cup in Germany. Maryam Majd , a prominent Iranian photographer and activist who had campaigned for women to be allowed to enter stadiums to watch football matches in Iran, was arrested in late June before going to Germany, where she wanted to work on a book about women and sport. Within days of Ahangarani going missing, Deutsche Welle – Germany’s international broadcasting service, which had invited her to Berlin – confirmed she had been arrested. “The Farsi-language service of Deutsche Welle, Germany’s international broadcasting service, has learned from people close to the actress that Ahangarani has been arrested,” the German news organisation said. “Deutsche Welle had set up a blog for Ahangarani, who enjoys broad popularity in Iran, to report on the women’s World Cup soccer championships currently being held in Germany.” At least four other women rights activists have been arrested in recent weeks, including Mahnaz Mohammadi , an acclaimed documentary filmmaker, Zahra Yazdani, a journalist, and campaigners Maryam Bahrman and Mansoureh Behkish. Ahangarani, the daughter of acclaimed Iranian filmmakers Jamshid Ahangarani and Manijeh Hekmat, has repeatedly pushed boundaries in her career as a young actor playing roles in a country where women are obliged to cover themselves from head to toe. At 15, Ahangarani featured in a controversial film, The Girl in the Sneakers, which touched the then taboo issue of a rebellious girl who wanted to have a boyfriend in an Islamic society. Girls in Iran are not allowed to have boyfriends, although the majority of young people rebel against it in today’s Iran. According to Deutsche Welle, officials in Tehran have confirmed that Ahangarani is currently being held by the security agents of the Revolutionary Guards. Ahangarani has contacted her family once since her arrest, when she told them she was unaware of her whereabouts or the charges against her. No information was available on where she was being held or whether she had access to legal representation. The London-based human rights organisation ARTICLE 19 has called on Iran to release Ahangarani and Mohammadi. “ARTICLE 19 calls on the Iranian government to immediately release Mohammadi and Ahangarani, and other artists and activists unjustly detained,” Agnes Callamard, the executive director, said. “The authorities must clarify the reasons for their arrests and ensure that the women have access to legal representation.” In recent years, several filmmakers and actors have been arrested or sentenced to lengthy prison terms. Director Jafar Panahi received a six-year prison term and 20-year ban on filmmaking last year, along with Mohammad Rasoulof, who was also sentenced to six years in jail. Ramin Parchami, a prominent actor, remains in custody after he was arrested in protests staged in February in solidarity with the uprisings in the Arab world. Iran Middle East Women’s World Cup 2011 Saeed Kamali Dehghan guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …President says failure to increase borrowing would put up interest rates, in effect raising everyone’s taxes Barack Obama has warned that the US is “running out of time” to raise the limit on US government borrowing and that failure to do so will lead in effect to a tax increase for all Americans, because a downgrade of the country’s credit rating would cause an interest rate rise. The president’s warning was reinforced by a threat from the ratings agency Standard & Poor’s to strip the US of its AAA standing if no long-term political deal is reached to tackle government spending and debt. As Obama and Republican leaders in Congress continued to wrangle over the terms for approving an increase in the US’s $14.3 trillion (£8.9tn) debt ceiling by the 2 August deadline – with Republicans rejecting Obama’s demand that tax increases for the wealthy accompany sharp budget cuts – the president warned ordinary Americans of the seriousness of the situation. “This is not some abstract issue. These are obligations that the United States has taken on in the past. The Congress has run up the credit card and we now have an obligation to pay our bills. If we do not it could have a whole set of adverse consequences. We could end up with a situation, for example, where interest rates rise for everybody all throughout the country, effectively a tax increase on everybody,” he said. But Obama also told a White House press conference that while the situation was serious, it could be resolved. “We don’t have to do anything radical to solve this problem. Contrary to what some folks say, we’re not Greece, we’re not Portugal. “It turns out that our problem is we cut taxes without paying for them over the last decade … We fought two wars. We didn’t pay for them. We had a bad recession that required a recovery act and stimulus spending.” S&P, which follows Moody’s in warning of a possible downgrading of the US’s top credit rating, put America on negative watch on Thursday and said there was “at least a one-in-two likelihood” that it could downgrade its debt “by one or more notches … if we conclude that Congress and the administration have not achieved a credible solution to the rising US government debt burden and are not likely to achieve one in the foreseeable future”. Obama said that political leaders “should not even be this close to a deadline on this issue”, but he stood firm in his opposition to Republican plans for $2.4tn in immediate spending cuts. The president said to achieve that level of savings without added tax revenues would require the “gutting” of social programmes that he could not support. He said that when ordinary Americans are asked to contribute more to retirement and healthcare programmes, then “millionaires and billionaires can afford to do a bit more”. Republican leaders in the US Senate appeared to be edging closer to an emergency deal with Democrats that would permit the president to raise the debt ceiling unilaterally, but there was continued opposition from fiscal conservatives in the House of Representatives who view such an arrangement as a victory for the White House. Obama said that the Republicans had “boxed themselves in” with election commitments. The Republican leadership in the House of Representatives said it won control of the lower house of Congress in last November’s election with a mandate to sharply cut government spending without any increase in taxes. The Tea Party movement and fiscal conservatives intend to hold newly elected House members to that commitment, and warn that any deal with the president that does not include deep cuts or permits tax increases will be viewed as a betrayal. Obama described any temporary solution that did not tackle long-term spending problems as the least attractive option. “We have a unique opportunity to do something big. We have a chance to stabilise America’s finances for a decade, for 15 years or 20 years, if we’re willing to seize the moment,” he said. John Chambers, chairman of S&P’s sovereign ratings committee, also warned that an interim solution of the kind under discussion in the Senate would not be good enough and that Washington must tackle the long-term debt issue. “If you get a small agreement, that will lead to a downgrade,” he told Reuters. US economy Economics Financial crisis Banking US domestic policy United States Chris McGreal guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …WikiLeaks founder’s biological father, attending extradition hearing, tells of son’s ‘immense desire for justice in the world’ Julian Assange’s biological father has described his son as a “great dissident” in what he said would be his first and probably only media interview. John Shipton, who has been attending the Assange extradition hearing in London, spoke to the Spanish newspaper el País and confirmed that his son did not get to know him until his mid-20s. “I have kept my mouth closed so as not to hinder things,” said Shipton, whose name Assange used to register the Wikileaks.org domain name in 2006. Shipton met Assange’s mother, Christine, then aged 17, at an antiques shop on his way to a Vietnam war demonstration – which she joined. Little is known about the relationship, except that it had ended by the time of their son’s first birthday – if not earlier. Christine then married theatre director Brett Assange. Shipton told el País that he first got to know his son after Christine rang his Sydney home in 1996. Assange was 25 at the time. “It was extraordinary,” Shipton said. “Certain of his thought processes made it seem like I was staring into a mirror. I could barely believe it. He had the same logic, the same intense curiosity, the same obtuse way of constructing sentences … that never end.” That meeting coincided with, or came soon after, Assange’s 1996 trial for computer hacking – where his lawyer talked of a “really quite tragic” nomadic childhood that saw him attend at least a dozen schools. His mother became pregnant in her early 20s after she “effectively ran away from home” to Sydney, according to court documents used by Guardian journalists David Leigh and Luke Harding in their book WikiLeaks: Inside Julian Assange’s War On Secrecy. The documents state that Shipton “never took up residence or if he did only took up residence for a very short time” and “had no contact with [Assange]“. Assange nevertheless later felt confident enough to use his father’s name to register WikiLeaks’ internet domain name, re-registering Shipton’s nominal address in 2008 as Nairobi in Kenya. Shipton had worried that his son was a modern Don Quixote. “At that time it seemed as though Julian loved tilting at windmills, but it turned out not to be like that.” He warned Assange that he was setting himself tough, idealistic targets. “When someone tells you they want to turn the world upside down, you reply: ‘OK, try it. But it’s not that easy!’” Shipton, who is believed to work as a freelance architect in Sydney, said Assange had inherited Christine’s fighting spirit. “He is a great dissident, well-prepared for a new era in which direct action is practised via the internet.” He said his son’s style of dissidence followed in the tradition of people like Che Guevara, Apollinaire or south American hero Simón Bolívar. Shipton is convinced Assange is the victim of a conspiracy. “I think all this has been organised,” he said, while adding that he did not want to hurt Assange’s alleged Swedish victims with his words. “The intelligence agencies got involved in this business from the very start.” Assange’s father apparently sees the US government behind the decision by Mastercard and Visa to prevent WikiLeaks accepting donations from their credit cards. “There is no separation between governments and finance,” he said. “There are many intelligent people in the world, but most seem to be wicked, while Julian seems to have the moral courage and ability to carry his vision through. He seems to have an immense desire for justice in the world.” Julian Assange WikiLeaks Giles Tremlett guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …(Here’s FOX News finally covering Rupertgate) I’ve been calling for News Corp. to be investigated in America and so have many other bloggers and that seems to taking hold across the political landscape. Finally, it’s happening, thanks to Rupertgate. Not that I trust Rep. Peter King, but I’ll take his words at face value: New York Rep. Peter King (R) has called on the FBI to investigate allegations that journalists working for Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp. hacked into the phones of victims of the September 11th attacks. “It is revolting to imagine that members of the media would seek to compromise the integrity of a public official for financial gain in the pursuit of yellow journalism,” King said in a letter to FBI Director Robert Mueller. “The 9/11 families have suffered egregiously, but unfortunately they remain vulnerable against such unjustifiable parasitic strains.” According to the U.K.’s Daily Mirror , a former New York City police officer who now works as a private investigator claims that News Of The World reporters asked him to get the phone records of dead victims of 9/11, from the days leading up to the attacks. “[The investigator's] presumption was that they wanted the information so they could hack into the relevant voicemails, just like it has been shown they have done in the U.K.,” a Mirror source said. Washington Post: The FBI has opened a preliminary inquiry into allegations that News Corp. employees sought to hack into the phones of victims of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks and tried to bribe law enforcement officers for information, U.S. officials said Thursday. FBI agents are reviewing information on the phone-hacking scandal engulfing Rupert Murdoch’s British media operations and trying to determine if U.S. laws were broken, the officials said. Murdoch is chairman and chief executive of News Corp., which is based in New York and has extensive U.S. operations. While it is unclear if the review will expand into a full investigation, the FBI’s involvement heightens the scrutiny faced by the media giant, which is under intense fire in Britain over allegations that its journalists hacked into the phones of thousands of people. The FBI probe also raises the politically delicate possibility that the Obama administration— which has questioned the objectivity of News Corp.’s Fox News — could bring criminal charges against employees of the network’s parent company. Murdoch is a political conservative, and last year he directed a $1 million contribution to the Republican Governors Association on behalf of News Corp. Murdoch’s UK rags have had a disastrous effect on England’s political landscape as they’ve boasted that they won many an election for their favorites. The scandal that has collapsed the British tabloid News of the World and rocked the News Corp. empire, brings into question the pervasive influence of Rupert Murdoch’s media holdings on British media and politics. The past five prime ministers have courted Murdoch assiduously in gaining and holding onto office — none more so than Labour’s Tony Blair. In plotting his path to 10 Downing St. in the mid-1990s, Blair once flew to an island off the coast of Murdoch’s native Australia to address an annual meeting of News Corp. That impressed Murdoch, who threw his support behind Blair’s New Labour movement. I think they should have been investigated when Roger Ailes unleashed the NY Post’s Page Six tabloid trash to attack Keith Olbermann when he was feuding with Bill O’Reilly: Rupert Murdoch’s handmaidens over at the New York Post this morning jumped into a feud between their Fox News shouting head Bill O’Reilly and MSNBC ranter Keith Olbermann. The tabloid’s gossip page ran an item dredging up various minor controversies involving Olbermann dating back to his ESPN days, up through an alleged spat between Olbermann and fellow MSNBC personality David Gregory last Tuesday over camera time. They did the same thing to Andrea Mackris when she sued Bill O’Reilly too . Mackris has also drawn her share of negative coverage. The New York Post, which is owned by the same parent company as Fox, ran the headline ” ‘Lunatic’ O’Reilly Gal Went Nuts in Bar.” But she kept up the public pressure, telling the New York Daily News that her father wanted to challenge O’Reilly to a duel. Howard Kurtz has more on the Ailes threats to Jeff Zucker: Bill O’Reilly, the Fox News star, is mounting an extraordinary televised assault on the chief executive of General Electric, calling him a “pinhead” and a “despicable human being” who bears responsibility for the deaths of American soldiers in Iraq. On the surface, O’Reilly’s charges revolve around GE’s history of doing business with Iran. But the attacks grow out of an increasingly bitter feud between O’Reilly and the company’s high-profile subsidiary, NBC, one that has triggered back-channel discussions involving News Corp. owner Rupert Murdoch, Fox News Chairman Roger Ailes, NBC chief executive Jeff Zucker and General Electric’s CEO, Jeffrey Immelt. Ailes called Zucker on his cellphone last summer, clearly agitated over a slam against him by MSNBC host Keith Olbermann. According to sources familiar with the conversation, Ailes warned that if Olbermann didn’t stop such attacks against Fox, he would unleash O’Reilly against NBC and would use the New York Post as well. Both Fox and the Post are owned by Murdoch, who complained about Olbermann’s conduct in separate calls to Zucker and Immelt. The high-level appeals failed, and O’Reilly has escalated his criticism of GE in recent weeks, declaring, “If my child were killed in Iraq, I would blame the likes of Jeffrey Immelt.” How many other times did News Corp unleash the dogs or threaten to against their rivals that we don’t know about? That is: How many times did the threats succeed? A lot, I’ll bet.
Continue reading …