Click here to view this media I caught this last night and did not get a chance to post it earlier, but man was this one painful interview to watch. Lawrence O’Donnell was doing extra duty with Rachel Maddow on vacation and additional live coverage after President Obama’s speech on the debt ceiling last night and during his late night coverage had on Democratic Rep. Rob Andrews and Republican Rep. Marsha Blackburn. Par for the course, Blackburn did her best to filibuster the segment and O’Donnell for the most part allowed it for the better part of the entire 12 minute or so interview. I’ll spare everyone some of her back and forth with Rep. Andrews where he tried to get her to explain her vote for the Ryan budget and what it does to Medicare among a few other topics and if anyone is interested you can read the entire transcript here . The parts of this that were worth watching were O’Donnell calling Blackburn out for lying about what the polls say when it comes to lowering the deficit by raising taxes on the rich and other revenue increases and asking her if the GOP caucus lies to each other behind closed doors about public opinion and not just in public. He also did a nice job of hitting her up for why she was continually willing to raise the debt ceiling in the past but rather than answer him, she just continued with her filibustering. Please Lawrence, if you do have her back on as you offered to do at the end of this very long segment, don’t let her talk the entire time or talk over another guest the way she did here again. This would have been much more bearable to watch if the interview was just condensed to these portions which is what’s included in the clip above: O’DONNELL: Congresswoman Blackburn, the Republican position of no revenue uses at all in deficit reduction is supported by only 26 percent of the American people. How can the Republicans maintain that they are in any way acting as representatives of the people when they are taking a position that is opposed by over 70 percent of the people? BLACKBURN: I find it interesting that you phrase the question that way. I will tell you one of the things we hear repeatedly from people from coast to coast is that Washington doesn’t have a revenue problem. It has a spending problem. What the American people would really like to see us do is to get this out-of-control, wasteful Washington spending under control. We’ve heard from economists from coast to coast there again who have said what you have to do is move forward with the spending reduction plan. They want to see that. The ratings agencies want to see it. We can‘t continue on this trajectory. This president has spent $7.3 trillion. We haven‘t had a budget in 800-and-something days, and $3.4 trillion of what he has spent is debt. We‘re borrowing 40 cents of every dollar that is spent. We have to get a handle on this. Number one thing is to get the spending under control and cut, cap and balance—cut being the first part of that. That is the step that we have agreed should be taken first and quite frankly I think there are plenty of polls out there that show the American people also agree with that. That spending reductions have to take place. O‘DONNELL: No, Congresswoman, there are no polls out there, no polls out there that support the Republican position. I just told you. BLACKBURN: CNN had a poll that did. O‘DONNELL: Sixty-seven percent — BLACKBURN: CNN had a poll that did. O‘DONNELL: Sixty-seven percent said that deficit reduction must be a balance. My question to you, Congresswoman, is — BLACKBURN: Ours is the most balanced plan. O‘DONNELL: I know you come on television and spout the talking points. But when you guys close the door and you have a Republican caucus in the House, do you actually lie to each other about the polls there, or does anyone in that room say, hey, this is getting politically difficult? Our position is opposed by 67 percent of the people. Does anyone say that in your caucuses, any one referred to real polls? BLACKBURN: Lawrence, the way you phrase that is insulting, and I think that you know that. O‘DONNELL: I don‘t think it is. Congresswoman, I know you‘re defying the polls now. I‘m asking you in your private discussions, does anyone mention real polls or do you all just do these fake talking points to each other? Is that how you sound talking to each other behind closed doors? BLACKBURN: We are focused on making certain that the steps we take are going to honor the commitment that we have taken, the oath of office that we have taken, to make certain that we put this nation on a firm financial footing. What we do not want to do is have the nations that hold our debt, China being one, Japan number two, the U.K. number three and OPEC number four. Those are the entities that hold our debt. China owns about 25 percent of that. What we don‘t want to do, Lawrence, is to cap our children‘s future and trade it to the people that hold that debt. This is a very serious issue. It is one where we cannot kick the can down the road. What we are saying is, let‘s get this addressed. And we are certain that we have put good plans on the—you know, the president doesn’t have a plan. He has yet to a put a plan on the table. O‘DONNELL: He has put a plan on the table. Did you see—did you see—Congresswoman, he put a plan on the table at 6:00 p.m. on Friday at in his conference, he out lined specific cuts— BLACKBURN: No, what he said today he didn’t want to bore us with the details of the plan. O‘DONNELL: He has put plans on the table. And every time he‘s put a plan on the table — BLACKBURN: That‘s what he said on the speech. No, you‘re incorrect. O‘DONNELL: — the Republicans have walked away. They refuse to discuss it. BLACKBURN: He has not. He‘s given speeches. But CBO can‘t score the speeches, and you can‘t put a speech on the board and call the vote on it. He‘s got a teleprompter, but he doesn’t have a plan, and we as Republicans have plans. O‘DONNELL: He does have plans. Congresswoman, I have to move on to Congressman Andrews. Let‘s him have a chance to speak here. Your filibustering can go on all night. He does have plans. I‘m not going to lie about that on this show. Go ahead, Congressman. ANDREWS: I want to ask you a simple question. BLACKBURN: Rob, I‘m not here to be interviewed—I‘m not here to be interviewed by you. ANDREWS: Are you here to answer questions? Will you answer one question? Listen, I‘m here to do—I‘m here to do an interview with Lawrence. I was not here to be interviewed by you. O‘DONNELL: Congressman Andrews — ANDREWS: Lawrence, can I suggest a question you should ask? Ask her whether—because she‘ll answer your questions evidently. O‘DONNELL: Well, we‘ll see. ANDREWS: Ask her whether the Ryan budget included the Medicare reductions in the health care bill in it or not? O‘DONNELL: Did the Ryan, Congresswoman Blackburn, do you want to take that question, Congresswoman Blackburn? BLACKBURN: I find it so interesting that you have a member – O‘DONNELL: — you‘re not going to answer. (CROSSTALK) O‘DONNELL: Congresswoman Blackburn, are there any circumstances under which you would vote for a debt ceiling increase without accompanying spending cuts? BLACKBURN: No. We’ve already put that on the floor. We had that vote. I think it‘s — O‘DONNELL: Congresswoman, you did vote for that. Congressman, you did—tell America the truth. You voted for it. Congresswoman, tell America the truth. You voted for a 9 percent increase in America‘s debt ceiling BLACKBURN: Under President Bush, yes. O‘DONNELL: It was a one-sentence bill. It had no spending cuts in it, nothing in it, one sentence bill. BLACKBURN: You‘re talking about a vote in ‘06. That‘s correct. You‘re correct. O‘DONNELL: You voted for it. Why did you that? Why did you vote for a debt ceiling increase that was a one-sentence bill with no spending cuts whatsoever? BLACKBURN: Lawrence, I have to tell you this. The spending right now is out of control. O‘DONNELL: So, you‘re not going to tell you why you cast that vote, right? You won‘t answer that question? BLACKBURN: This president has spent — O‘DONNELL: You‘re going to give a speech but you won‘t answer a question about why you— ANDREWS: Lawrence, we now have something in common. She wouldn’t answer your questions either. O‘DONNELL: We‘re running out of time. I‘m going to have to wrap this up. I don‘t want to interrupt you, but I don‘t expect you to actually answer it. BLACKBURN: Spending has to stop. O‘DONNELL: Right. OK. So you won‘t answer that question about why you cast that vote that way in the past. BLACKBURN: I told you. There has been far too much spending. The spending is out of control. We have to get it under control. O‘DONNELL: When the debt was at $7 trillion, when the debt was at $7 trillion, Congresswoman Blackburn, you didn’t blink at eye at raising it.
Continue reading …It’s no secret that Republicans aren’t enamored with Rep. John Boehner’s debt ceiling bill. The Tea Party has come out strongly against it too. What is Boehner going to do? Apparently, they want to go out and beat up some Democrats, or something like that. TPM’s Brian Beutler writes a great piece about how the Republicans in the HOUSE used a gangster movie clip to try and rally the troops with none other that Rep. Allen West leading the charge. I get that reporters are hungry for color and that members of Congress and their staffs sometimes err when they decide what to reveal. But it’s hard to imagine who was thinking what when House aides leaked to the Washington Post this eye-popping anecdote about a House GOP caucus meeting today in which leadership got their troops pumped up to support the Boehner debt bill with a scene from a gangster film where loyalty trumps morality and justifies brutal assault. Check out how House Republican leaders are reportedly whipping support for John Boehner’s troubled debt limit bill . From the Post … House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), the party’s vote counter, began his talk by showing a clip from the movie, “The Town”, trying to forge a sense of unity among the independent-minded caucus. One character asks his friend: “I need your help. I can’t tell you what it is. You can never ask me about it later.” “Whose car are we gonna take,” the character says. After showing the clip, Rep. Allen West (R-Fla.), one of the most outspoken critics of leadership among the 87 freshmen, stood up to speak, according to GOP aides. “I’m ready to drive the car,” West replied, surprising many Republicans by giving his full -throated support for the plan. A couple things. First, that’s not the complete movie quote. Here’s the complete quote : Doug MacRay: I need your help. I can’t tell you what it is, you can never ask me about it later, and we’re gonna hurt some people . James Coughlin: …Whose car we takin’? Second, having rallied their troops with the clip of a scene of two guys agreeing to a revenge attack, the man who rises to the moment for GOP leaders is… Rep. Allen West . We all know about Allen West’s background in Iraq: CNN.com reported on December 13, 2003, that West threatened to kill an Iraqi policeman his soldiers were interrogating. West also reportedly “watched four of his soldiers … beat the detainee on the head and body.” CNN.com further reported that military prosecutors said West’s actions “amounted to torture.” According to a December 14, 2003, Boston Globe article , military officials said that West “disobeyed laws, ignored orders … and mortgaged future discipline in his unit.” So it’s not shocking that this scene in Ben Affleck’s movie would rouse him into action. Boehner’s plan is in real jeopardy as I write this post. Looks like a rewrite is happening. Moments after the Congressional Budget Office released an analysis finding that the House Republicans’ debt limit bill falls far short of one their key goals , House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) decided to rewrite the legislation, and according to GOP leadership, an expected Wednesday floor vote on the package will be delayed until Thursday at the earliest. What movie clip will the GOP use to sway the base back in Boehner’s favor this time? How about Tarantino’s Stuck in The Middle With You ?
Continue reading …The school holidays are well under way, and if the kids are driving you mad, check out our latest events and activities for children, from enchanted princesses to electric guitars Far, far away, Manchester From 2 August, the normally hushed rooms of Manchester Art Gallery will be disrupted by the squeals of children as they discover a fantasy world of princesses and knights. Set over the two top floors of the gallery, the transformed space will include three tents where kids under 12 can create costumes and make films of their stories to project on to the gallery walls. Artists will also be on hand to organise art activities, and there will be sensory play areas for babies and toddlers. • manchestergalleries.org . Free, 2-28 August, Tuesdays to Sundays, 1-3pm Bike It, nationwide Britain has 13,000 miles of walking and cycling routes, among them plenty of short, traffic free ones suitable for children. UK charity Sustrans is promoting its best family-friendly routes as part of its Free Range Kids campaign, aimed at ensuring future generations of independent, active children. The routes include the Spen Valley Greenway, near Bradford, a 5½-mile route along the River Exe in Devon and a nine-mile ride into the heart of the New Forest with Holmsey tearooms providing a handy pitstop. Or get a breath of sea air on a five-mile ride from Frinton to Clacton in Essex, building up an appetite for fish and chips. • sustrans.org.uk Steam fair and vintage vehicle rally, Somerset Sometimes the old ones are the best. A nostalgic day out is on the cards at the West Somerset steam fair and vintage vehicle rally held at Norton Fitzwarren, near Taunton, on 6 and 7 August. Steam engines, fire engines, tractors, steam rollers and buses will be on display, giving kids the opportunity to ride them and witness the huffing and puffing of the engines, not to mention all the fun of a fair(ground). • west-somerset-railway.co.uk . 10am-5pm each day, adults £8, children £4, family ticket £20 Traquair Fair, Scotland Traquair Fair, held in the grounds of Traquair House on the Borders on 6 and 7 August, is one of Scotland’s longest-running fairs, offering theatre, outdoor spectacles, music, dance, storytelling. This year’s theme is fire, and so there will also be flame-eating, glass-blowing demonstrations, forging and pottery-making. Included in the ticket price is a tour of the house, which dates from 1107 and was a hunting lodge for the kings and queens of Scotland. Bed and breakfast accommodation is available in the house (doubles £180), or you can camp in the grounds. • traquair.co.uk/content/traquair-fair . Adults £19 booked online, children over five £13, family ticket £46 Record-breaking, Carmarthenshire The Campbell family, famous for breaking land and water speed records in the 20th century, celebrate the centenary of their Bluebird car this year, and are showing no signs of slowing down. On 13 and 14 August, Don Wales, grandson of Sir Malcolm Campbell, will attempt to break his own electric land speed record of 137mph, as he aims for 150mph on a four-mile stretch of Pendine Sands in Carmarthenshire, where his grandfather set the world land speed record for the first time in 1924. With high adrenaline and fast cars, this will be an exciting weekend, with speed trials for the 500mph land speed attempt taking place, too. • bluebirdspeedrecords.com . Free. Record attempts 3pm on Saturday and Sunday School of Rock, Brighton Kids might balk at the idea of going to school in the holidays – unless it’s the School of Rock. The Brighton Institute of Modern Music (Bimm), which runs rock’n’roll colleges in Brighton and Bristol, has teamed up with Total Guitar and Metal Hammer magazines to offer three courses in August. The Total Guitar summer school (1-4 August, limited availability) covers artists from Bloc Party to Eric Clapton, with tutors including Paul Weller. The Skindred-to-Black Sabbath Metal Hammer school is from 8-11 August.
Continue reading …Staff at Exeter prison rumble plot by two artistic inmates who created fake brickwork to hide hole being dug through cell wall Prison staff foiled an apparent attempted breakout in which inmates allegedly hacked through a wall and disguised the hole they had left with fake bricks made out of papier-mache. Two inmates are said to have dug through the thick wall of a cell at Exeter prison and jammed the false, painted bricks into the gap to hide what they were doing. Unfortunately for them, a guard spotted masonry dust on the ground, while another staff member saw that the brickwork on the exterior wall of the second floor did not look quite right – and the plot was rumbled. Detective Constable Alex Bingham of Exeter police said: “We believe that two inmates may have orchestrated a move to one of the only cells that you could possibly dig from. “They dug through the wall and used papier-mache to fill in where the mortar had fallen out. They have then used paint to paint over what they have done. If you did a visual check of the cell you would not have noticed it.” The men are thought to have gained access to the arts and crafts department, where they obtained paint and materials to make the papier-mache. When the interior wall of the cell was inspected it was allegedly wet with paint and the bricks that had been removed were hidden under a bunk bed. Even if the inmates had made it out they would still have had to negotiate a high wall topped with razor wire to complete their escape. The two men, who have not been identified, were arrested and are being held at separate jails after being charged with attempting to escape lawful custody. A former inmate of Exeter prison said he was not surprised at the attempt. The ex-prisoner, who served a sentence at the prison a decade ago, claimed the walls were in a bad condition and prison officers rarely carried out checks on the fabric of the building. No one at the prison was available to comment. Crime Prisons and probation Steven Morris guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …UK supreme court rules British prop designer, Andrew Ainsworth, may sell replicas of stormtrooper outfits he made for original Star Wars film A British prop designer has won his battle with Star Wars creator George Lucas over the right to sell replica stormtrooper outfits following a supreme court ruling. Twickenham-based Andrew Ainsworth, 62, built the original costumes used in Star Wars and has been selling the outfits, based on his moulds for the 1977 blockbuster, online for a number of years. He successfully argued the costumes were functional works rather than artistic ones, and therefore not subject to full UK copyright laws. “The judges concluded that the helmet could not be regarded as an artistic work because it was a mass produced item – remember how many stormtroopers there were? – and has an utilitarian role,” said leading intellectual property lawyer Simon Bennett of Fox Williams LLP. Lucas had taken the case before a succession of judges in an effort to halt Ainsworth’s work. He has now been forced to admit defeat – in the UK at least – following the ruling by the UK’s highest court for civil cases, which upheld a decision taken at the court of appeal in 2009. “This is a massive victory, a total victory, we’ve already got the champagne out,” Ainsworth told the BBC, adding that he had gone to court on a principle and was not going to allow the director to “buy his soul”. He told the Daily Telegraph: “I am proud to report that in the English legal system David can prevail against Goliath if his cause is right. If there is a force, then it has been with me these past five years.” However, the supreme court also ruled that Lucas’s copyright had been violated in the US, meaning Ainsworth will no longer be able to sell his costumes there. The film-maker successfully sued Ainsworth for $20m in the US when he began selling replicas of the models in 2004 , but a succession of UK courts overturned that ruling, culminating in today’s decision. “He lost on the US issue and as a result claims for infringement of foreign copyright can now be brought in the UK,” said Bennett. Ainsworth’s suits cost up to £1,500 and are highly sought after by Star Wars devotees, who wear them to fan conventions, as well as collectors. A spokesman for Lucasfilm told Sky News the court had “maintained an anomaly of British copyright law under which the creative and highly artistic works made for use in films … may not be entitled to copyright protection in the UK”. The BBC has posted a video in which Ainsworth shows how he makes the outfits. George Lucas Star Wars Science fiction and fantasy Intellectual property UK supreme court Design Fashion Ben Child guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …UK supreme court rules British prop designer, Andrew Ainsworth, may sell replicas of stormtrooper outfits he made for original Star Wars film A British prop designer has won his battle with Star Wars creator George Lucas over the right to sell replica stormtrooper outfits following a supreme court ruling. Twickenham-based Andrew Ainsworth, 62, built the original costumes used in Star Wars and has been selling the outfits, based on his moulds for the 1977 blockbuster, online for a number of years. He successfully argued the costumes were functional works rather than artistic ones, and therefore not subject to full UK copyright laws. “The judges concluded that the helmet could not be regarded as an artistic work because it was a mass produced item – remember how many stormtroopers there were? – and has an utilitarian role,” said leading intellectual property lawyer Simon Bennett of Fox Williams LLP. Lucas had taken the case before a succession of judges in an effort to halt Ainsworth’s work. He has now been forced to admit defeat – in the UK at least – following the ruling by the UK’s highest court for civil cases, which upheld a decision taken at the court of appeal in 2009. “This is a massive victory, a total victory, we’ve already got the champagne out,” Ainsworth told the BBC, adding that he had gone to court on a principle and was not going to allow the director to “buy his soul”. He told the Daily Telegraph: “I am proud to report that in the English legal system David can prevail against Goliath if his cause is right. If there is a force, then it has been with me these past five years.” However, the supreme court also ruled that Lucas’s copyright had been violated in the US, meaning Ainsworth will no longer be able to sell his costumes there. The film-maker successfully sued Ainsworth for $20m in the US when he began selling replicas of the models in 2004 , but a succession of UK courts overturned that ruling, culminating in today’s decision. “He lost on the US issue and as a result claims for infringement of foreign copyright can now be brought in the UK,” said Bennett. Ainsworth’s suits cost up to £1,500 and are highly sought after by Star Wars devotees, who wear them to fan conventions, as well as collectors. A spokesman for Lucasfilm told Sky News the court had “maintained an anomaly of British copyright law under which the creative and highly artistic works made for use in films … may not be entitled to copyright protection in the UK”. The BBC has posted a video in which Ainsworth shows how he makes the outfits. George Lucas Star Wars Science fiction and fantasy Intellectual property UK supreme court Design Fashion Ben Child guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Northern League member says Norwegian killer’s ideas are in defence of western civilisation One of Silvio Berlusconi’s former ministers has defended the thinking of the Norwegian mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik. Interviewed on a popular radio show, Francesco Speroni, a leading member of the Northern League, the junior partner in Berlusconi’s conservative coalition, said: “Breivik’s ideas are in defence of western civilisation.” Speroni spoke as other right-wingers around Europe, including leading officials of his own party, distanced themselves from the massacre on Utøya and the ideology that inspired it . The Italian politician was endorsing the comments of another high-profile member of the league who had drawn fierce criticism for arguing that the killings might have been part of a plot to discredit hardline conservative thinkers. Like many in his party, Mario Borghezio, who sits in the European parliament, is an admirer of the writings of the late Italian journalist and author Oriana Fallaci, who popularised the term Eurabia to describe a future, supposedly Islamised Europe. Borghezio, a member of the European parliament’s committee on civil liberties, justice and home affairs, suggested that there was something suspicious about the fact that Breivik had been able to move around freely until last Friday. He said he disagreed with the way “this massacre is being used to condemn positions like that of Oriana Fallaci”. While describing the Norwegian killer as “unbalanced”, Borghezio said: “Christians ought not to be animals to be sacrificed. We have to defend them.” His comments brought outraged demands for his expulsion from opposition politicians and at least one member of the Berlusconi government. The party’s chief organiser, Roberto Calderoli, who also sits in the cabinet, responded with a public apology to Norway “and above all to the relatives of the victims for the terrible, unspeakable remarks made in a personal capacity by [Mario] Borghezio”. His gesture was almost immediately undermined, however, when Speroni spoke up in defence of his party colleague, using even franker language than Borghezio. Unlike his fellow MP, who is notorious for headline-grabbing, extremist comments, Speroni is a Northern League heavyweight. He was the minister for institutional reform in Berlusconi’s first government between 1994 and 1995 and has since been the league’s chief whip in the senate, the upper house of the Italian legislature, and the European parliament. “I’m with Borghezio. I don’t think he should resign”, Speroni said. “If [Breivik's] ideas are that we are going towards Eurabia and those sorts of things, that western Christian civilisation needs to be defended, yes, I’m in agreement,” he told Radio 24. In France, the National Front announced on Tuesday it had suspended a former local election candidate who made remarks on his blog that were interpreted as supportive of Breivik. Italy Europe Anders Behring Breivik Norway John Hooper guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Northern League member says Norwegian killer’s ideas are in defence of western civilisation One of Silvio Berlusconi’s former ministers has defended the thinking of the Norwegian mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik. Interviewed on a popular radio show, Francesco Speroni, a leading member of the Northern League, the junior partner in Berlusconi’s conservative coalition, said: “Breivik’s ideas are in defence of western civilisation.” Speroni spoke as other right-wingers around Europe, including leading officials of his own party, distanced themselves from the massacre on Utøya and the ideology that inspired it . The Italian politician was endorsing the comments of another high-profile member of the league who had drawn fierce criticism for arguing that the killings might have been part of a plot to discredit hardline conservative thinkers. Like many in his party, Mario Borghezio, who sits in the European parliament, is an admirer of the writings of the late Italian journalist and author Oriana Fallaci, who popularised the term Eurabia to describe a future, supposedly Islamised Europe. Borghezio, a member of the European parliament’s committee on civil liberties, justice and home affairs, suggested that there was something suspicious about the fact that Breivik had been able to move around freely until last Friday. He said he disagreed with the way “this massacre is being used to condemn positions like that of Oriana Fallaci”. While describing the Norwegian killer as “unbalanced”, Borghezio said: “Christians ought not to be animals to be sacrificed. We have to defend them.” His comments brought outraged demands for his expulsion from opposition politicians and at least one member of the Berlusconi government. The party’s chief organiser, Roberto Calderoli, who also sits in the cabinet, responded with a public apology to Norway “and above all to the relatives of the victims for the terrible, unspeakable remarks made in a personal capacity by [Mario] Borghezio”. His gesture was almost immediately undermined, however, when Speroni spoke up in defence of his party colleague, using even franker language than Borghezio. Unlike his fellow MP, who is notorious for headline-grabbing, extremist comments, Speroni is a Northern League heavyweight. He was the minister for institutional reform in Berlusconi’s first government between 1994 and 1995 and has since been the league’s chief whip in the senate, the upper house of the Italian legislature, and the European parliament. “I’m with Borghezio. I don’t think he should resign”, Speroni said. “If [Breivik's] ideas are that we are going towards Eurabia and those sorts of things, that western Christian civilisation needs to be defended, yes, I’m in agreement,” he told Radio 24. In France, the National Front announced on Tuesday it had suspended a former local election candidate who made remarks on his blog that were interpreted as supportive of Breivik. Italy Europe Anders Behring Breivik Norway John Hooper guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Nothing illustrates Republican priorities more starkly than this little piece of video, where Fox News host Martha MacCallum opines that we’d have more of a solid fiscal position to pay for wars if we didn’t have Medicare and Social Security. Media Matters: MACCALLUM: But I want to ask you one more question, because when I watched the president last night he talked about the things that have driven us to this situation, and he said two wars that we couldn’t pay for, a prescription drug plan that, you know, was way too expensive to pay for, and the financial crisis that followed and that was, you know, toward the beginning of his watch and overlapping the Bush administration. But I couldn’t help thinking, well, if we weren’t in such a precarious situation and hadn’t overextended ourselves to such an incredible extent where we are sending out 80 million checks a month – the U.S. government – wouldn’t we have been able to handle those things like the two wars in a much better, stronger fiscal position , and isn’t that where we really want to be as a country, where a war doesn’t bust us because we’ve got good fundamentals? Wow. To her, a social safety net isn’t a “good fundamental”?
Continue reading …Taliban suspected, though Karzai ally may have been victim of grudge over destruction of illegally built homes Afghan insurgents appeared to continue their assassination campaign against key public figures on Wednesday with the killing of the mayor of Kandahar. Ghulam Haider Hamidi was targeted by a suicide bomber who got into the municipality compound in Kandahar City with explosives concealed under his turban. The technique was first used earlier this month in a mosque in the city during a memorial service for Ahmed Wali Karzai, a regional strongman and half-brother of the president. Abdul Manan, a municipality employee, said the mayor had emerged from his office into the garden, where he made a call on his mobile phone. The assassin grabbed him and detonated the bomb. “I rushed outside and saw the mayor was lying still on the ground,” said Manan. “Another headless body was next to him and the mayor had deep wounds on his face and chest.” The death of Hamidi will raise further concerns about whether military gains by the US military in the Kandahar region, particularly in districts adjoining the city, will be undermined by the remorseless killing of top public figures. The death comes weeks after the killing in their homes of two powerful politicians in the south: Ahmed Wali Karzai and Jan Mohammad Khan, an ally of the Karzai family and a key figure in neighbouring Uruzgan province. In April, Kandahar’s police chief was killed by a suicide bomber who entered police headquarters. A recent UN report said “targeted killings” had increased in the first half of 2011 from an already high level. Assassination attempts had caused 43 injuries and 190 deaths – a 5% increase on the same period in 2010. “Every death piles on top of the other and leads to a sense of demoralisation, that nobody is safe,” said Martine van Bijlert, co-director of the Afghanistan Analysts Network. “Previously these attacks were carried out when the targets were on the move, either in their cars or on the way to the mosque or somewhere else where they were vulnerable. But now we have this recent development where assassins are able to enter secure areas and target people there.” Hamidi, an Afghan-American who worked as an accountant in the US for 20 years, was nowhere near as politically important as Ahmed Wali Karzai. Although Karzai held an elected position as the head of the provincial council, he was a powerbroker who wielded enormous power through his control of the war economy. US strategy in the south has been to try to build the influence of formal institutions and government officials against such informal “malign actors”. Hamidi held an official position but was also very much part of the Karzai family network in the south, to which he owed his job. It had been rumoured that he might take the lead role in the province after the killing of Ahmed Wali. As well as being a target of insurgents attempting to weaken the government in any way possible, Hamidi had made plenty of enemies among businessmen and power brokers who felt excluded from war economy contracts, projects and other get-rich schemes that have largely benefited the extended Karzai family and its tribal allies. The fact that the Taliban’s spokesmen were relatively slow to claim credit for the assassination prompted speculation that his killing could be the result of a personal grudge. Hamidi was attacked in some quarters over the Aino Minna development, a somewhat surreal US-style suburb on the edge of Kandahar City. In part developed by Mahmoud Karzai, one of the Afghan president’s controversial brothers, the scheme has been criticised for being built on land once owned by the ministry of defence that was sold cheaply after intense lobbying, some from Hamidi. At the time of his assassination Hamidi’s office was surrounded by around 100 protesters, furious at the municipality’s destruction of houses built illegally on government land in recent days in the Loy Wala area of Kandahar. One protester, Hajji Lal Mohammad, said the mayor had sparked outrage in the community where the houses were destroyed, apparently killing two children. “They destroyed 200 houses and two children were killed,” he said. “When I saw the bulldozers I also wanted to kill the mayor.” The governor of Kandahar, Toryalai Wesa, warned the “land mafia” who illegally occupy land that “you might be happy that the mayor is gone but we will stand and we will destroy illegal houses”. Although a statement by the governor’s office seemed to suggest that the land issue was the reason the mayor had been killed, the governor said it was too early to say who was responsible and that the killing was being investigated. Afghanistan Taliban Ahmed Wali Karzai Hamid Karzai United Nations Jon Boone guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …