NYT’s David Leonhardt: All True ‘Fiscal Conservatives’ Support Tax Increases
July 28, 2011 No Comment
Wednesday’s “ Lessons From The Malaise ” is David Leonhardt’s last economics column before becoming the New York Times's Washington bureau chief. It pretty much encapsulates his liberal worldview, while assuming his premises are universally shared. One of the tricky things about the subject is that almost nothing is certain in the way that, say, two plus two equals four. Economics — which is at root a study of human behavior — tends to be messier. Because it’s messier, it can be tempting to think that all uncertainty is equal and that we don’t really know anything. Leonhardt again writes as if it is all serious thinkers admit tax increases are necessary. When it comes to economics, we know that a market economy with a significant government role is the only proven model of success. The United States has outgrown Europe partly because of our greater comfort with market forces. China and India boomed after allowing more of a market economy. On the other hand, unencumbered market forces often lead to disaster, as 1929 and 2008 made clear. We also know that ever-rising levels of education are crucial to a country’s success. Not only is the evidence all around us — the college wage premium has been higher than ever lately — but careful studies have found that, on the margin, education itself tends to make people wealthier, healthier and happier. The next time you hear naysayers poormouth college, ask them if they plan to send their own children. We know that the federal government has promised more benefits than it can currently afford. The only way out of this problem involves some combination of tax increases and cuts to Medicare, Social Security and the military. Anyone who won’t get specific about which ones they favor is not a fiscal conservative. We know this country spends vastly more on health care than any other country — about 75 percent more per person than other rich countries — without getting vastly better results. The waste in our medical system offers the best chance to reduce the deficit without harming our living standards. Who exactly is in favor of “waste in our medical system”? What many are against is rationing medical care in the name of cost savings, which would be encouraged under Obama-care ( and which Leonhardt strongly supports ). Leonhardt concluded with the conventional liberal wisdom on global warming, er, “climate change.” We know the planet is getting hotter. Last year tied for the warmest on record, and the 10 hottest have all occurred since 1998. The resulting risks, economic and otherwise, may be even more serious than the risks from the deficit, but receive far less attention in Washington. (And climate worriers do not need to be so skittish about making the connection between heat waves and the larger trend. The thing about global warming is that it warms the globe.)
Continue reading …
Official figures by Commons defence committee also estimates cost of Libyan no-fly zone and bombing at £260m The cost of British military operations in Afghanistan is now officially estimated to amount to more than £18bn, figures released on Thursday show. The cost of imposing a no-fly zone and bombing targets in Libya is so far officially estimated at £260m. The figures are contained in a report by the Commons defence committee which makes it clear the sums are no more than estimates. “The total cost of operations in Afghanistan is not known”, it states. The Ministry of Defence told the committee: “It is too early accurately to forecast the cost of UK operations in Libya”. The defence committee reveals that the MoD estimates the cost of military operations in Afghanistan this year to be more than £4bn. It has said the cost until March this year amounted to about £14bn. However, the sums for Afghanistan , and the £260m – more than half spent on bombs and missiles – estimated for Libya, are described as “additional costs” of operations to be paid for by the Treasury out its reserves. The figures do not include what the defence committee describes as “additional costs in terms of training opportunities cancelled or deferred and equipment wear and tear that will eventually have to be met”. The committee adds that it is “disappointed” by the MoD’s inability to provide information it asked for about some £12bn worth of “write-offs” as a result of equipment, including a fleet of Nimrod maritime reconnaissance aircraft, and the navy’s type 22 frigates, scrapped as part of last year’s strategic defence and security review. Asked for a breakdown, it received a reply “which left us little the wiser”, the committee says. And it expresses concern that the armed forces voluntary redundancy programme is over-subscribed and that applications, and even resignations, have been received from individuals who might have achieved “high command”. More than 900 officers and men have applied for redundancy, though the army has asked for just 500 volunteers. The army is also likely to lost a significant number of experienced NCOs. The Commons defence committee has asked the MoD to show how it will ensure that the voluntary redundancy programme “does not impact on the future leadership capability and effectiveness of the armed services”. James Arbuthnot, the committee’s chairman, said: “In some instances the department appears to be unable or unwilling to provide the kind of detailed information we ask for, notably in respect of the total cost of military operations and the detail of savings proposed. This prevents proper parliamentary scrutiny. We expect these gaps to be filled.” British troops in Afghanistan are to be issued with waterproof “bacteria-zapping socks” designed to help keep their feet dry when they are wading through ditches and streams, the MoD announced on Thursday. And in a new addition to their “pelvic protection system”, troops will be equipped with “ballistic knee-length shorts” for troops operating lead metal detectors in search for improvised explosive devices. Foreign policy Military Libya Afghanistan House of Commons Ministry of Defence Middle East Africa Richard Norton-Taylor guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …
Nurses, teachers and civil servants unhappy with planned contribution increases resulting from axing of final salary pension scheme Unions have condemned proposals that will see 2.5 million nurses, teachers and civil servants face pension contribution increases totalling more than £1bn next year if proposed changes to their occupational pension schemes are implemented. The Cabinet Office , Department for Education and the NHS have published consultations on pension contribution increases that will cost their pension scheme members £180m, £300m and £530m respectively in the financial year 2012-13. The increases represent just 40% of the average 3.2 percentage point increase in public sector pensions which the government said it would phase in from April 2012. This means that people working in these sectors face further hikes in their contributions in the following two years to make up the remaining 60% of the proposed increase. The Royal College of Nursing has reacted with anger. Dr Peter Carter, chief executive and general secretary of the RCN, said: “The government has clearly torn up the agreement that would have led to increasing affordability in public sector pensions. That agreement would have delivered long-term savings. It appears that nurses and other public servants are now bearing the brunt of a financial crisis caused by reckless risk-taking in the banking sector. “Hardworking nurses are in the middle of a two-year pay freeze, inflation is soaring and they now face the prospect of paying more money into their pension next year for no additional benefit. This latest development is not just about contributions in 2012. It is the start of a process that will increase contributions even further and make nurses work until they are dropping on their feet. All this is likely to have a devastating impact on the morale of dedicated nurses.” The National Union of Teachers (NUT) said starting a consultation during the parliamentary recess was a cynical move as there would be little chance for scrutiny. Christine Blower, the NUT general secretary, said: “There is no surprise in this announcement. It has been obvious from the start that the government has no intention of listening to reason and has been determined to implement changes to public sector pension schemes regardless of whether they are necessary or not.” The proposals, based on work by former work and pensions secretary Lord Hutton, exempt 750,000 people earning less that £15,000 from the increases. Above this level, next year’s increases will be tiered: 1 million public sector workers earning £15,000-21,000 will have their increase capped at 0.6 percentage points and the maximum increase of 2.4 percentage points will apply to another 1 million people. Even if the proposed increase in contributions goes ahead, public sector employees still face uncertainty about the level of income they will receive on retirement and the age at which they can draw their pension. The government wants to scrap the current final salary pension scheme, which bases pension income on the salary in the last year of employment and length of service, multiplied by an “accrual” rate (usually one 80th or in some cases, one 60th). Under the replacement – a career average revalued scheme (Care) – the pension benefit earned each year is based on the salary in that year rather than the final salary. The benefit is then “revalued” each year until the member retires or leaves by a prescribed amount. This revaluation rate is as crucial to the quality as the accrual rate. The government is still in discussions with unions about most details of the new schemes, including the accrual and revaluation rates. But the Public and Commercial Services Union (PCS), the main civil service union, said the announcement about increases to contributions “made a mockery of the ongoing negotiations and proves that the government is determined to make people pay more and work longer in return for smaller pensions”. The PCS general secretary, Mark Serwotka, said: “These highly detailed proposals show that the government has made its mind up and is not negotiating seriously. It makes a mockery of the ongoing talks. We’re committed to negotiation but these have to be serious, not limited to the government’s predetermined outcomes. “Already more trade unions have indicated they will take part in further strike action and today’s announcement will only increase that resolve. The government talks about the need to make changes to help reduce the deficit in four years. But these changes would be permanent – a life sentence for civil servants.” However, the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) said the proposals were firm but fair. Charles Cotton, the CIPD reward and pensions adviser, said: “Government proposals to increase pension contributions for public sector workers are part of a necessary compromise to retain a great employee benefit at a fairer cost to hard pressed tax payers. “It is incorrect that most public sector pensions are ‘gold plated’, but they are still a great staff benefit and one that is almost impossible to find now in the private sector. Because of this it is important that both the government and unions communicate and educate public sector employees that their pension is still a great benefit and well worth paying to stay in. “With rising life expectancy, it is increasingly hard for the public purse to fund a growing length of time spent in retirement, so these reforms are needed.” Tom McPhail, pensions expert with independent financial adviser Hargreaves Lansdown, said the uncertainty about future benefits made it “a bit like having a money purchase pension” but added that the schemes would still be generous compared to those built up by most people working in the private sector. The consultations apply to the NHS and teachers in England and Wales, and the Civil Service in England, Scotland and Wales. Older workers who are a couple of years from retirement will not be affected by the switch to a Care scheme or the later retirement age, but they will face an increase in contributions during the last few years of their career. The government has confirmed in the consultations that employees who have already contributed to a public sector scheme will retain all the benefits already earned and that all pension benefits earned up to the proposed point of change in April 2015 will continue to be calculated as before. Pensions Economic policy Occupational pensions Work & careers Family finances Trade unions Public sector careers Public sector pensions Jill Insley guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …
Click here to view this media Paul Krugman wrote a terrific column that the clip above depicts perfectly where Chris Cilizza and the panel on Chuck Todd’s show on MSNBC are bemoaning the loss of those great “compromisers” in the U.S. House of Representatives — those rotten corporate Blue Dogs who got voted out of office during the last election. Heaven forbid we’ve now got some actual Republicans with an “R” behind their name instead of a “D”, but they’re rabid right wingers who would rather burn the whole house down than give an inch on their extremist ideology. The Villagers love “centrism” and compromise as long as it always means everyone governing like Republicans and as Krugman points out later in his column, their fetish for it is allowing the extremism in the Republican Party to go unpunished. As John already wrote about here , I’m not sure what it will take to get them to quit with the “both sides” false equivalencies either, but I’m as tired of it as Krugman is. Sadly the example in the clip above is just one of hundreds that are being pushed by the Villagers on every network day, after day, after day. The Cult That Is Destroying America : Watching our system deal with the debt ceiling crisis — a wholly self-inflicted crisis, which may nonetheless have disastrous consequences — it’s increasingly obvious that what we’re looking at is the destructive influence of a cult that has really poisoned our political system. And no, I don’t mean the fanaticism of the right. Well, OK, that too. But my feeling about those people is that they are what they are; you might as well denounce wolves for being carnivores. Crazy is what they do and what they are. No, the cult that I see as reflecting a true moral failure is the cult of balance, of centrism. Think about what’s happening right now. We have a crisis in which the right is making insane demands, while the president and Democrats in Congress are bending over backward to be accommodating — offering plans that are all spending cuts and no taxes, plans that are far to the right of public opinion. So what do most news reports say? They portray it as a situation in which both sides are equally partisan, equally intransigent — because news reports always do that. And we have influential pundits calling out for a new centrist party, a new centrist president, to get us away from the evils of partisanship. The reality, of course, is that we already have a centrist president — actually a moderate conservative president. Once again, health reform — his only major change to government — was modeled on Republican plans, indeed plans coming from the Heritage Foundation. And everything else — including the wrongheaded emphasis on austerity in the face of high unemployment — is according to the conservative playbook. Read on…
Continue reading …
Between 2006 and 2009 carrier bag use was down by 40% but in 2010 the downward trend was reversed British consumers are packing away their green credentials along with their weekly shop, as last year an increasing number of us bundled our purchases into single-use plastic carrier bags instead of seeking out environmentally friendly alternatives. Plastic bag use plunged after 2006 , when the government, retailers and green campaigners spearheaded a push to cut down on the 11bn plastic carriers Britons used each year, most of which find their way into landfill or – much more damagingly – into waterways and the sea, where they are a hazard to marine life. By 2009, bag use was down by about 40% to under 6.5bn. But last year, that downward trend was reversed. Perhaps owing to recessionary worries, people forgot their hessian sacks and filled up on plastic again – more than 6.8bn were used, up about 5% on the previous year, according to the government’s Waste and Resources Action Programme (Wrap). The British Retail Consortium said part of the increase was likely to be down to shoppers making more short trips to stores, rather than a single big weekly shop. But the retail trade body said the small increase should be put in context of the “massive” progress made since 2006, and said plastic bags were only one of the many ways in which retailers were cutting their environmental impact. Bob Gordon, head of environment at the British Retail Consortium, said: “It’s encouraging to see the majority of consumers are continuing to reuse their carrier bags and are taking as few new bags as possible. We urge customers to keep that up, particularly when changing shopping habits, including more trips to stores, present a challenge to maintaining the progress made in recent years.” He rejected calls for a bag ban or charges, which could penalise shoppers at a time of financial hardship. “The overall numbers remain the sort of result other environmental campaigns can only dream of,” he said. “But it’s time to accept bags are not the be-all and end-all of environmental issues.” Plastic bag data is difficult to compare over the past five years, because of changes in the way the statistics are collected. Between 2008 and 2009, the data was collated on a mid-year basis, from June to May, but from last year Wrap decided to return to presenting it on a calendar year basis. In 2006, nearly 11bn single use carriers were used, but after campaigning this fell to 10bn the following year and was down to just over 7bn by 2008-09 before bottoming out at under 6.5bn by 2009-10. But for the full year of 2010, bag use rose again to 6.8bn. The campaign against disposable plastic bags , which green campaigners have pursued for years but which gained traction from 2006 when Wrap collated its first comprehensive statistics, enjoyed a high profile for several years. In 2007, it received a massive boost from the launch of Sainsbury’s stylish cotton shopping bag from designer Anya Hindmarch, emblazoned with the legend “I’m not a plastic bag”. The product – which sold for £5 in the supermarket – went on to have a lucrative after-life on eBay, reportedly changing hands for as much as £200 a time. But while retailers say they are continuing their efforts to reduce bag use, there is less publicity around the issue. However, in some parts of the UK, legislators are taking an interest. In Wales , shoppers will be charged 5p per bag from this October, and a consultation on charging for bags kicked off in Northern Ireland last week. Scotland shelved its proposals for a charge, but they could yet be revived. In Wales, the imminent charge may have helped to cut bag use – the total was down by 7% last year, compared with the rise in England and Scotland. John Griffiths, Welsh environment minister, said a charge was the best way to drive down carrier use, as voluntary agreements with retailers would not achieve enough. He said: “These figures show a real difference between carrier bag use in Wales and that in other parts of the UK where no mandatory charge is planned. This proves that the carrier bag charge, which is due to be introduced in Wales on 1 October, is the only way to ensure a real and lasting reduction in the use of carrier bags.” Plastic bags Waste Consumer affairs Fiona Harvey guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …
Two suicide bombers kill at least 15 people and injure 30 in an attack on a local bank in Saddam’s home town Two suicide bombers have killed at least 15 people and wounded more than 30 in the Iraqi city of Tikrit as police and soldiers were collecting their salaries at a local bank. The attacks were the latest to target local Iraqi security forces as the last US troops prepare to pull out of the country more than eight years after the invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein. One suicide bomber detonated his explosives among officers who were gathered outside the Rafidain bank in the centre of Tikrit, 150 km (95 miles) north of Baghdad, and moments later another blew up a car when emergency workers arrived, police said. “Just a few minutes after I entered I heard a huge explosion. We ran outside to see what was happening, I saw bodies and the wounded all over the place,” said Assam Dhiyab, a policeman who was collecting his unit’s wages. A Tikrit hospital official said at least 15 people were killed and more than 30 wounded in the blasts. Most of the casualties were Iraqi soldiers. Television footage showed a column of black smoke rising from the blast site. “Initial indications are that the first explosion was a suicide bomber wearing an explosive vest with a large amount of explosive,” said police lieutenant Mohammed Naif. “According to witnesses the bomber was targeting a group of soldiers and officers of the Iraqi army.” Tikrit, Saddam’s hometown, is dominated by Sunni Muslims and suspected Sunni Islamists tied to al-Qaida have carried out frequent attacks in the town, including two of the deadliest in the country this year. On 18 January a suicide bomber attacked a police recruiting centre, killing 60 people and wounding more than 100. On 29 March militants took hostages at the provincial council headquarters and fought gunbattles with the security forces. At least 53 people were killed and scores wounded. On 3 June, two blasts in the city, one targeting worshippers in a mosque, killed 21 people and wounded 70. Three days later a suicide bomberblew up a car at the entrance to a complex of palaces once used by Saddam, killing 13 people. Violence in Iraq has dropped sharply from the height of sectarian killing in 2006 and 2007, but insurgents and militias still carry out daily attacks and assassinations in an attempt to undermine the government. Local police and soldiers have been increasingly targeted both by Sunni and Shia armed groups. Insurgents often set off one blast and then detonate another when emergency forces arrive. The remaining 46,000 US troops in Iraq are due to leave by the end of this year. Iraqi forces say they can contain internal threats but acknowledge that they need more training to plug capability gaps. Iraq Middle East guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …
Win for Hollywood studios as UK high court rules BT must block access to Newzbin2 Hollywood film studios won a landmark UK high court ruling on Thursday forcing BT to block access to an illegal file-sharing website accused of operating “on a grand scale”. The Motion Picture Association, the trade body whose members include Warner Bros, Fox, Disney and Paramount Pictures, has been granted an order requiring BT — the UK’s biggest internet service provider — to block its customers’ access to the website Newzbin2. Thursday’s verdict will be viewed by the creative industries as a landmark that could set a precedent for the widespread blocking of illegal filesharing websites by ISPs, helping to stem the flow of digital piracy in the UK. “In my judgment it follows that BT has actual knowledge of other persons using its service to infringe copyright: it knows that the users and operators of Newzbin2 infringe copyright on a large scale, and in particular infringe the copyrights of the studios in large numbers of their films and television programmes,” said Justice Arnold in his ruling at the high court in London. “[BT] knows that the users of Newzbin2 include BT subscribers, and it knows those users use its service to receive infringing copies of copyright works made available to them by Newzbin2,” Arnold added. BT had argued that forcing it to ban its 6 million UK customers from accessing a website would usher in a new wave of online censorship. However, the creative industries claim website blocking could save them hundreds of millions of pounds in illegal downloads. The MPA said that Newzbin2 makes unlawful copies of television programmes and films, and receives in excess of £1m a year from its 700,000 users. “This ruling from Justice Arnold is a victory for millions of people working in the UK creative industries and demonstrates that the law of the land must apply online,” said Chris Marcich, MPA managing director for Europe, the Middle East and Africa. “This court action was never an attack on ISPs, but we do need their cooperation to deal with the Newzbin site, which continually tries to evade the law and judicial sanction.” The film industry’s fight to block Newzbin stretches back to March last year, when the high court ordered the site to take down all of its pirated material and pay damages to the studios. The three men behind Newzbin Ltd – Chris Elsworth, Thomas Hurst and Lee Skillen – sold all of their shares in the company to David Harris shortly before the trial. Newzbin Ltd went into administration soon after the ruling and avoided the huge payouts. Months later a clone site appeared operating anonymously from Sweden. Rights holders said they had no choice but to force BT to block UK users’ access to the website, saying all other legal avenues had been exhausted. Simon Milner, director of group industry policy at BT, said the latest judgment means rights holders will now have to prove in court that a website infringes copyright before it is blocked. Milner added that the judgment puts the Digital Economy Act voluntary blocking scheme, drawn up at industry roundtable meetings earlier this year with Ed Vaizey, the culture minister, in an uncertain position. “[The judgment] is actually helpful and we welcome it because it clarifies a complex area of law and shows that rights holders can use the copyright laws in this country. It means they have to prove a site is infringing before [a] court and get a court order,” he said. Milner did not reveal how much it will cost ISPs such as BT to block infringing websites. Other internet providers, including TalkTalk and Virgin Media, declined to join BT’s battle against the film studios, the court was told in June. Speaking after Thursday’s judgment, a spokeswoman for TalkTalk said the ruling had “no direct or immediate” impact on the ISP, the second largest in the UK, but that it would consider any similar court orders brought by film studios against it. The Internet Service Providers’ association, which represents Britain’s ISPs, said: “Concerns about over-blocking, ease of circumvention and increased encryption are widely recognised which means that blocking is not a silver bullet to stop online copyright infringement.” Filesharing Internet Computing Piracy Piracy Digital media BT Telecommunications industry Online TV Josh Halliday Mark Sweney guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …
Former legal high used by 4.4% of all people aged between 16 and 24, as use of illegal drugs in decline long-term Mephedrone, the former legal high known as “meow meow”, is as popular as cocaine among teenagers and young adults, despite being banned last year. according to official figures published today. Home Office figures drawn from the authoritative British Crime Survey estimate that around 300,000 16 to 24-year-olds, or 4.4% of their age group, used mephedrone in the past 12 months. This is a similar level of popularity to the use of powder cocaine by teenagers and young adults. The BCS survey, drug misuse declared 2010/2011, say that mephedrone and cocaine rank joint second in popularity behind cannabis for this age group. Mephedrone ranks alongside ecstasy in popularity among all drug users aged between 16 and 59, with 1.4% of all adults reporting they had used them in the past year. The results of the annual survey of drug use in England and Wales show that almost 3 million people (8.8% of adults) used illicit drugs in the past year. They also show that one million of them – or 3% – used class-A drugs, with a fall in the use of cocaine accompanied by a rise in the use of methadone. Around 2.2 million people aged 16 to 59 used cannabis last year and the survey also indicates a rise in popularity in ketamine in recent years. The use of illegal drugs among the younger age group of 16 to 24 has, however, undergone a long-term decline, from 29% of the age group reporting they had used an illicit drug in 1996 to 20% in 2010/2011. Home Office minister, James Brokenshire, denied that the alarming figures for the use of mephedrone, which was made illegal in April 2010, demonstrated that the ban had been ineffective. He said the BCS figures covered patterns of use before and after the ban had come into force. He stressed that just because a drug had been sold as a legal high it did not mean it was harmless. But the interviews undertaken by the BCS for this year’s report would have took place between April 2010 and March this year. Respondents were however asked about their illicit drug use in the previous 12 months, and so could have related to the period when mephedrone was a legal high. Mephedrone Drugs policy Drugs Alan Travis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …
Judge appointed by David Cameron to look into phone-hacking scandal says terms of inquiry have expanded considerably Lord Justice Leveson, appointed by David Cameron to look into the fall-out from the phone-hacking scandal, has warned that the expansion of the terms of reference of his inquiry has been so broadened that he may not be able to complete the first part of the inquiry within the planned timescale of a year. He was speaking as his inquiry team met for the first time in London to discuss how it would proceed. He said “in the first instance the inquiry will focus primarily on what I am calling the relationship between the press and the public and the related issue of press regulation”. He said he would have powers to compel named witnesses to attend and would be discussing with the DPP the extent to which he will be able to look at the scale of specific media wrongdoing before the criminal inquiries have been completed. In a prepared statement, he said: “It may be tempting for a number of people to close ranks and suggest that the problem is or was local to a group of journalists then operating at the News of the World but I would encourage all to take a wider picture of the public good and help grapple with the width and depth of the problem.” He said it was critical that the inquiry concentrated on “the central and most important issue”, adding the “focus of the inquiry is the culture practices and ethics of the press in the context of the latter’s relationship with the public, the police and politicians.” He said in September he would be holding in the first instance “a series of seminars on the ethics of journalism and the practices and pressures of investigative journalism”. He added: “At some stage there needs to be a discussion of what amounts to the public good, to what extent the public interest should be taken into account and by whom”. He added he would later hold seminars on press relationships with the police, politicians and the political process. In one of his few specific commitments he said one aspect of the inquiry may look into why “no action was taken in 2006 following a report by the information commissioner” into the use of private detectives and eavesdropping. He stressed the 2005 Inquiries Act under which he is operating gave him powers to require witnesses to attend and provide documentation. He said he would not at this stage be seeking to invite editors or proprietors to provide files on which they had based stories into “the utterly inappropriate behaviour of small sections of the press”. Leveson’s aides stressed that the Lord Justice of Appeal’s repeated references to the press in his statement should not be taken to mean that he would be ignoring the role of broadcasters or social media. The terms of reference were widened by a group of select committee chairmen determined to look at the role of the BBC in seeking to dominate the broadcasting and websites . Leveson also addressed concerns that he may be seen as close to News International due to the fact that he has attended two parties at the home of Matthew Freud, the publicist and husband of Elisabeth Murdoch, the daughter of News Corps chairman, Rupert Murdoch. He said he had met Freud by chance at a dinner in February 2010 when Freud had offered to do some work free of charge on the issue of public confidence in sentencing. Leveson is chair of the Sentencing Council. With the knowledge of the Lord Chief Justice, Leveson attended two large evening events at Freud’s London home in London in July 2010 and January 2011 to discuss these issues. He said he had not spoken with anyone from Freud Communications since January 2011. Another inquiry member Lord Currie said although he was a past chairman of Ofcom, the broadcasting regulator, that did not mean he favoured statutory regulation. In a statement he said: “That is not the case. I believe self regulation with good governance in place, can be superior. Each case needs to be judged on it merits.” Phone hacking Newspapers & magazines David Cameron National newspapers Newspapers Patrick Wintour guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …
With 21 EU member states now under varying degrees of rightwing government, Europe has never been more blue. See how has its political complexion has changed in the 38 years since Britain joined the EEC Chris Fenn Garry Blight Sheila Pulham Guardian Research Department
Continue reading …