We don’t care about helping sick people – we’re Republicans! I wonder if Gov. Rick’s antipathy toward these programs has anything to do with the potential loss of money to his family’s nursing homes or his contributors in the insurance and health care industries? Of course, since he’s a wingnut, there’s always a strong possibility that he’s simply crazy: In recent months, either Gov. Rick Scott’s administration or the state’s Republican-controlled Legislature has rejected grants aimed at moving long-term care patients into their homes, curbing child abuse through in-home counseling and strengthening state regulation of health premiums. They have shunned money to help sign up eligible recipients for Medicare, educate teenagers on preventing pregnancy and plan for the health insurance exchanges that the law requires by 2014. While 36 states shared $27 million to counsel health insurance consumers, Florida did not apply for the grants. And in drafting this year’s budget, the Legislature failed to authorize an $8.3 million federal grant won by a county health department to expand community health centers. In distancing itself from the law, Florida declined to participate in a Medicaid pilot program that would have authorized up to $2 million in reimbursement to providers using a new hospice model for severely ill children. The state insurance commissioner applied to the Obama administration for a waiver from this year’s requirement that health insurers spend at least 80 percent of premium revenue on medical care. Only at the last minute did the State Health Department agree to provide required letters of support for community groups applying for federal wellness and prevention grants. Critics say the state’s Republican leadership has carried its opposition to the health care law too far. The grants being shunned by the state, they point out, have little connection to the provisions that Florida is challenging in cour t, namely the insurance mandate and the expansion of Medicaid eligibility. “It’s simply unconscionable that they’re turning back federal tax dollars that our citizens and businesses pay and sending those tax dollars to other states,” said Representative Kathy Castor, a Democrat who represents the Tampa Bay area. “Florida’s economy has been hit very hard, and we need every dollar and every job in our state.”
Continue reading …An unhinged Chris Matthews on Monday decried the debt ceiling deal negotiated in Congress, attacking Tea Party Republicans as a group of baby-kidnapping terrorists. He also bizarrely described the compromise as “political polygamy.” Talking to Jonathan Chait of the New Republic, Matthews excoriated, “Why did [Obama] let this develop for six months…this drum roll of the Republicans saying, 'We've got the baby. You don't get the baby back unless you pay us?' Why do you let the other side have the baby, to use kidnapping terms ?” [Video to appear shortly. MP3 audio here .] In an earlier segment, Matthews talked to Jack Lew, Barack Obama's Office of Management and Budget Director. The frustrated Hardball host wondered why the President lamented the President's failure to say,”[I will accept] no game playing, no hostage-taking, no terrorizing this country with the debt ceiling. I'm not going to negotiate with you guys. You can't play it that way.” Matthews began the program with this odd explanation of the deal: “Leading off tonight, political polygamy. The problem with this deal being struck among Republicans, Tea Parties and Democrats today is the problem with polygamy. It's not balanced. It's not equal. It's not fair.”
Continue reading …Greek officials begin appointing advisers for fire-sale of state assets intended to raise €50bn by 2015 The starting gun for one of the biggest fire-sales in western history was fired as Greek officials began appointing advisers for the country’s ambitious privatisation drive. “Our target is clear, and it is to generate €1.7bn from privatisations by the end of September and €5bn by the end of the year,” said the finance minister, Evangelos Venizelos. After securing a second aid package to prop up an economy now dependent on international handouts to pay public wages and pensions, Athens has moved with record speed to divest itself of state assets ranging from prime real estate to loss-making companies. By any measure it is a gargantuan task. At stake is Greece’s €350bn debt, which before the EU and IMF agreed to bailout the country again was predicted to peak at 172% of GDP next year. The socialist government says it aims to raise €50bn through the campaign by 2015. Enough, it is hoped, to not only make a dent in the debt but send a convincing message to the markets that have pummelled Athens since the onset of the crisis 18 months ago. The prime minister, George Papandreou, has cancelled his summer holidays to accelerate the dismantling of a sector that his father Andreas – Greece’s fiery socialist premier in the 1980s – did much to foster. International lenders have warned that if there no progress with privatisations they will withhold the next tranche of aid in September. “In more ways than one Papandreou is paying for the sins of his father,” said Nikos Dimou, author of the bestselling book The Misfortune of Being Greek. “It was Andreas, after all, who did more than anyone else to run Greece into debt.” The appearance of For Sale and For Rent signs on everything from former Olympic venues to island locales, casinos, marinas and airports, has been met with unexpected acceptance by Greeks long weaned on state largesse. A growing majority appears to agree it is the only way of arresting soaring unemployment by attracting foreign investment. Experts estimate Athens could own around €300bn worth of state property, almost as much as the total Greek debt. “There has definitely been a shift in mood,” said Stefanos Manos, a former national economy minister in a centre-right government. “But that could easily change. It is very clear that the government is only doing this under great duress from [our] international creditors,” he said. “With timetables being so pressing, I worry that the whole process is very ill-prepared. If it there is not enough transparency we may end up like Russia, where only a cast of oligarchs end up benefiting.” With the privatisation drive now seen as crucial to reviving economic growth, the government has actively courted countries with big sovereign wealth funds to invest in Greece. Last week Europe’s paymaster, Germany, signalled it was interested in snapping up assets in the energy and tourism sectors. At home tycoons who control large sectors of the media have also started jockeying for position in what one commentator called the “beginning of a civil war” to buy stakes in state companies. “It is going to be a minefield for the government,” said political analyst Giorgos Kyrtsos. “The troika [of lenders] are not well-versed in Greek reality. The programme is overly ambitious.” After years of resisting privatisations, the breakneck speed at which Athens has agreed to conduct the sales – nearly one every 15 days – has raised fears that state jewels will be sold at rock-bottom prices. “In a buyer’s market our biggest concern is that this entire process will only serve to benefit the forces of capitalism and do nothing to create development,” said Yiannis Panagopoulos, president of the Confederation of Greek Workers, the country’s biggest labour grouping. “We will strongly oppose the sale of any sector in which the government has a strategic interest … there will be huge resistance if it tries to sell the electricity company, the water board, our post office or ports, sectors that are vital to developing this country.” Greece Europe European debt crisis Global economy Economics Helena Smith guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Greek officials begin appointing advisers for fire-sale of state assets intended to raise €50bn by 2015 The starting gun for one of the biggest fire-sales in western history was fired as Greek officials began appointing advisers for the country’s ambitious privatisation drive. “Our target is clear, and it is to generate €1.7bn from privatisations by the end of September and €5bn by the end of the year,” said the finance minister, Evangelos Venizelos. After securing a second aid package to prop up an economy now dependent on international handouts to pay public wages and pensions, Athens has moved with record speed to divest itself of state assets ranging from prime real estate to loss-making companies. By any measure it is a gargantuan task. At stake is Greece’s €350bn debt, which before the EU and IMF agreed to bailout the country again was predicted to peak at 172% of GDP next year. The socialist government says it aims to raise €50bn through the campaign by 2015. Enough, it is hoped, to not only make a dent in the debt but send a convincing message to the markets that have pummelled Athens since the onset of the crisis 18 months ago. The prime minister, George Papandreou, has cancelled his summer holidays to accelerate the dismantling of a sector that his father Andreas – Greece’s fiery socialist premier in the 1980s – did much to foster. International lenders have warned that if there no progress with privatisations they will withhold the next tranche of aid in September. “In more ways than one Papandreou is paying for the sins of his father,” said Nikos Dimou, author of the bestselling book The Misfortune of Being Greek. “It was Andreas, after all, who did more than anyone else to run Greece into debt.” The appearance of For Sale and For Rent signs on everything from former Olympic venues to island locales, casinos, marinas and airports, has been met with unexpected acceptance by Greeks long weaned on state largesse. A growing majority appears to agree it is the only way of arresting soaring unemployment by attracting foreign investment. Experts estimate Athens could own around €300bn worth of state property, almost as much as the total Greek debt. “There has definitely been a shift in mood,” said Stefanos Manos, a former national economy minister in a centre-right government. “But that could easily change. It is very clear that the government is only doing this under great duress from [our] international creditors,” he said. “With timetables being so pressing, I worry that the whole process is very ill-prepared. If it there is not enough transparency we may end up like Russia, where only a cast of oligarchs end up benefiting.” With the privatisation drive now seen as crucial to reviving economic growth, the government has actively courted countries with big sovereign wealth funds to invest in Greece. Last week Europe’s paymaster, Germany, signalled it was interested in snapping up assets in the energy and tourism sectors. At home tycoons who control large sectors of the media have also started jockeying for position in what one commentator called the “beginning of a civil war” to buy stakes in state companies. “It is going to be a minefield for the government,” said political analyst Giorgos Kyrtsos. “The troika [of lenders] are not well-versed in Greek reality. The programme is overly ambitious.” After years of resisting privatisations, the breakneck speed at which Athens has agreed to conduct the sales – nearly one every 15 days – has raised fears that state jewels will be sold at rock-bottom prices. “In a buyer’s market our biggest concern is that this entire process will only serve to benefit the forces of capitalism and do nothing to create development,” said Yiannis Panagopoulos, president of the Confederation of Greek Workers, the country’s biggest labour grouping. “We will strongly oppose the sale of any sector in which the government has a strategic interest … there will be huge resistance if it tries to sell the electricity company, the water board, our post office or ports, sectors that are vital to developing this country.” Greece Europe European debt crisis Global economy Economics Helena Smith guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Check out the above video to see Pam Geller getting grilled about her anti-Muslim views. Republicans always get away with it. ( Pam Geller insists she “loves” Muslims. Too bad they’re also the enemies of America ) You’ve probably heard all about Ground Zero Pam and her anti-Muslim rants and behavior. She’s as radical as they come. Her brand of extremism is the kind we covered in our book, Over The Cliff and it’s the type of extremism that attracts her to FOX News, the Birthers and the Norway shooter. As soon as the NY Times linked her to Breivik, she’s been trying to scrub her site as fast as she can. Charles Johnson has been all over this story. Get a load of her latest unconscionable defense of herself and Anders Breivik : Popular hate blogger Pam Geller has received scrutiny in recent days as the public became aware that the right-wing terrorist in Norway, Anders Behring Breivik, had praised her blog and thoroughly cited her writing in his political manifesto. After a number of blogs made the connection, as well as the New York Times , the Atlantic , and other major outlets , Geller became incensed and began lashing out at her critics. In a post defending herself yesterday, Geller — who has called Obama “ President Jihad ” and claimed that Arab language classes are a plot to subvert the United States — reached a new low. Geller justifies Breivik’s attack on the Norwegian Labour Party summer youth camp because she says the camp is part of an anti-Israel “indoctrination training center.” She says the victims would have grown up to become “future leaders of the party responsible for flooding Norway with Muslims who refuse to assimilate, who commit major violence against Norwegian natives including violent gang rapes, with impunity, and who live on the dole.” To get her point across, Geller posts a picture of the youth camp children Breivik targeted. The picture was taken on the Utøya island camp about 24 hours before Breivik killed over 30 children, so it is likely Geller is mocking many of the victims. Under the picture, Geller writes: “ Note the faces which are more MIddle [sic] Eastern or mixed than pure Norwegian .” View a screen shot (click to enlarge) of Geller’s blog post below: enlarge Credit: AP Norway shooter victims Could Geller’s outburst of smears be a distraction against mounting evidence that she might have communicated with Breivik in the past? A post from Geller in 2007 reprints a reader-submitted letter in which an anonymous Norwegian complains of Muslim immigration and boasts that he is “ stockpiling and caching weapons , ammunition and equipment.” In the comment section, Geller claims that she provided anonymity to the reader to protect him from being prosecuted. Although Geller recently deleted the ammunition line from her post, a cached version is available. As Glenn Greenwald notes, “If this were an attack by a Muslim group, and a Muslim had something like this on his/her website, the FBI and multiple other groups would be swarming.” Doesn’t that picture look like a normal gathering of youths? Will the media start acting responsibly and stop transmitting extremist kooks like Pam Geller once and for all on our TV’s? I’ve been reading an excellent Noregian crime fiction writer, Jo Nesbo ‘s book, The Redbreast , about neo-Nazis. Eerie that I was reading it just as the shootings in Oslo happened. Nesbo posted an op-ed in the NY Times about the shooting.
Continue reading …Check out the above video to see Pam Geller getting grilled about her anti-Muslim views. Republicans always get away with it. ( Pam Geller insists she “loves” Muslims. Too bad they’re also the enemies of America ) You’ve probably heard all about Ground Zero Pam and her anti-Muslim rants and behavior. She’s as radical as they come. Her brand of extremism is the kind we covered in our book, Over The Cliff and it’s the type of extremism that attracts her to FOX News, the Birthers and the Norway shooter. As soon as the NY Times linked her to Breivik, she’s been trying to scrub her site as fast as she can. Charles Johnson has been all over this story. Get a load of her latest unconscionable defense of herself and Anders Breivik : Popular hate blogger Pam Geller has received scrutiny in recent days as the public became aware that the right-wing terrorist in Norway, Anders Behring Breivik, had praised her blog and thoroughly cited her writing in his political manifesto. After a number of blogs made the connection, as well as the New York Times , the Atlantic , and other major outlets , Geller became incensed and began lashing out at her critics. In a post defending herself yesterday, Geller — who has called Obama “ President Jihad ” and claimed that Arab language classes are a plot to subvert the United States — reached a new low. Geller justifies Breivik’s attack on the Norwegian Labour Party summer youth camp because she says the camp is part of an anti-Israel “indoctrination training center.” She says the victims would have grown up to become “future leaders of the party responsible for flooding Norway with Muslims who refuse to assimilate, who commit major violence against Norwegian natives including violent gang rapes, with impunity, and who live on the dole.” To get her point across, Geller posts a picture of the youth camp children Breivik targeted. The picture was taken on the Utøya island camp about 24 hours before Breivik killed over 30 children, so it is likely Geller is mocking many of the victims. Under the picture, Geller writes: “ Note the faces which are more MIddle [sic] Eastern or mixed than pure Norwegian .” View a screen shot (click to enlarge) of Geller’s blog post below: enlarge Credit: AP Norway shooter victims Could Geller’s outburst of smears be a distraction against mounting evidence that she might have communicated with Breivik in the past? A post from Geller in 2007 reprints a reader-submitted letter in which an anonymous Norwegian complains of Muslim immigration and boasts that he is “ stockpiling and caching weapons , ammunition and equipment.” In the comment section, Geller claims that she provided anonymity to the reader to protect him from being prosecuted. Although Geller recently deleted the ammunition line from her post, a cached version is available. As Glenn Greenwald notes, “If this were an attack by a Muslim group, and a Muslim had something like this on his/her website, the FBI and multiple other groups would be swarming.” Doesn’t that picture look like a normal gathering of youths? Will the media start acting responsibly and stop transmitting extremist kooks like Pam Geller once and for all on our TV’s? I’ve been reading an excellent Noregian crime fiction writer, Jo Nesbo ‘s book, The Redbreast , about neo-Nazis. Eerie that I was reading it just as the shootings in Oslo happened. Nesbo posted an op-ed in the NY Times about the shooting.
Continue reading …On Monday's “Martin Bashir,” MSNBC analyst Jonathan Alter proclaimed that America would “be in a depression now if there had been a balanced budget amendment in 2009.” Bashir, concurring with the former Newsweek editor, added, “Indeed.” Reacting to Rep. John Boehner's (R-Ohio) press conference about the debt-ceiling deal , Alter and Bashir mocked the speaker's suggestion that a balanced budget amendment is needed to “handcuff” Congress. [Video will be posted soon] “Yeah, I mean, I'm laughing at that because let's say we'd had a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution in early 2009 when we were losing close to 800,000 jobs a month and headed for another Great Depression,” groused Alter, a former Newsweek editor. “By Speaker Boehner's terms, we wouldn't have had any government efforts to try to end that near depression.” Alter's implicit assumption that President Barack Obama's $787 billion stimulus package was successful belies a 9.2 percent unemployment rate, an anemic housing market, and public opinion polls showing Americans think the country has been, and continues to be, on the wrong track . Not only that, but a balanced budget amendment does not preclude the possibility of injecting stimulus in times of economic distress, but rather, it forces Congress to prioritize spending to live within its means. It's not surprising that Alter would employ hyperbolic language to denigrate Republican proposals. After all, Alter told MSNBC's Cenk Uygur in April that in supporting the Ryan plan, the GOP voted to ” throw granny into the snow .” A transcript of the segment can be found below: MSNBC Martin Bashir August 1, 2011 3:45 p.m. Eastern LUKE RUSSERT, NBC congressional correspondent: The most interesting thing that he said though, was when he spoke at length about a balanced budget amendment. MARTIN BASHIR: Indeed. RUSSERT: That is a direct attempt to cater to the Tea Party part of his conference, essentially saying hey look, I know this is the framework of your Cut, Cap, and Balance that we tried to pass a couple weeks ago. The idea of this balanced budget amendment, saying this is the best chance I've had for it in the 20 years I've been here to try and garner support for it, that is trying to say to these Tea Party folks, hey come on board. If we extend this plan, albeit it's not perfect, but we'll have a great opportunity to try to pass a balanced budget amendment down the line. BASHIR: Indeed. Speaker Boehner actually said we would never have gotten into this mess in the first place had we had a balanced budget amendment. (Laughter) RUSSERT: Correct. That's the code word for the Tea Party, this balanced budget amendment. BASHIR: Jonathan Alter, you were laughing at that. JONATHAN ALTER: Yeah, I mean, I'm laughing at that because let's say we'd had a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution in early 2009 when we were losing close to 800,000 jobs a month and headed for another Great Depression. By Speaker Boehner's terms, we wouldn't have had any government efforts – BASHIR: Stimulus, nothing. ALTER: To try to end that near depression. Does he really think the country would have been better off if the Congress had been handcuffed and unable to take any measures to fight a coming depression? I think we'd be in a depression now if there had been a balanced budget amendment in 2009. BASHIR: Indeed. Jonathan Alter, Luke Russert, and Joy Ann Reid, thanks so much for joining us. –Alex Fitzsimmons is a News Analysis intern at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow him on Twitter.
Continue reading …On Monday's “Martin Bashir,” MSNBC analyst Jonathan Alter proclaimed that America would “be in a depression now if there had been a balanced budget amendment in 2009.” Bashir, concurring with the former Newsweek editor, added, “Indeed.” Reacting to Rep. John Boehner's (R-Ohio) press conference about the debt-ceiling deal , Alter and Bashir mocked the speaker's suggestion that a balanced budget amendment is needed to “handcuff” Congress. [Video will be posted soon] “Yeah, I mean, I'm laughing at that because let's say we'd had a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution in early 2009 when we were losing close to 800,000 jobs a month and headed for another Great Depression,” groused Alter, a former Newsweek editor. “By Speaker Boehner's terms, we wouldn't have had any government efforts to try to end that near depression.” Alter's implicit assumption that President Barack Obama's $787 billion stimulus package was successful belies a 9.2 percent unemployment rate, an anemic housing market, and public opinion polls showing Americans think the country has been, and continues to be, on the wrong track . Not only that, but a balanced budget amendment does not preclude the possibility of injecting stimulus in times of economic distress, but rather, it forces Congress to prioritize spending to live within its means. It's not surprising that Alter would employ hyperbolic language to denigrate Republican proposals. After all, Alter told MSNBC's Cenk Uygur in April that in supporting the Ryan plan, the GOP voted to ” throw granny into the snow .” A transcript of the segment can be found below: MSNBC Martin Bashir August 1, 2011 3:45 p.m. Eastern LUKE RUSSERT, NBC congressional correspondent: The most interesting thing that he said though, was when he spoke at length about a balanced budget amendment. MARTIN BASHIR: Indeed. RUSSERT: That is a direct attempt to cater to the Tea Party part of his conference, essentially saying hey look, I know this is the framework of your Cut, Cap, and Balance that we tried to pass a couple weeks ago. The idea of this balanced budget amendment, saying this is the best chance I've had for it in the 20 years I've been here to try and garner support for it, that is trying to say to these Tea Party folks, hey come on board. If we extend this plan, albeit it's not perfect, but we'll have a great opportunity to try to pass a balanced budget amendment down the line. BASHIR: Indeed. Speaker Boehner actually said we would never have gotten into this mess in the first place had we had a balanced budget amendment. (Laughter) RUSSERT: Correct. That's the code word for the Tea Party, this balanced budget amendment. BASHIR: Jonathan Alter, you were laughing at that. JONATHAN ALTER: Yeah, I mean, I'm laughing at that because let's say we'd had a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution in early 2009 when we were losing close to 800,000 jobs a month and headed for another Great Depression. By Speaker Boehner's terms, we wouldn't have had any government efforts – BASHIR: Stimulus, nothing. ALTER: To try to end that near depression. Does he really think the country would have been better off if the Congress had been handcuffed and unable to take any measures to fight a coming depression? I think we'd be in a depression now if there had been a balanced budget amendment in 2009. BASHIR: Indeed. Jonathan Alter, Luke Russert, and Joy Ann Reid, thanks so much for joining us. –Alex Fitzsimmons is a News Analysis intern at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow him on Twitter.
Continue reading …German media claims Horst Mahler identified as an informant for East German secret police in leaked report into 1967 shooting He is one of the most paradoxical and notorious figures in modern German history: a social democrat lawyer turned leftwing terrorist who went to prison, turned to Maoism and then came out as a far-right nationalist. Now there is another twist: Horst Mahler, a founding member of the Red Army Faction, was also a Stasi informant. According to German newspaper reports, the revelation comes from a leaked report by state prosecutors re-investigating the shooting of a pacifist by a Berlin policeman during a 1967 protest. According to Bild am Sonntag, which claims to have seen the report into the death of Benno Ohnesorg, Mahler was a so-called inoffizielle Mitarbeiter (informal collaborator) for the East German secret service up until 1970. The outing of any public figure as an IM is a controversial affair, but with Mahler, who is in a Bavarian prison for denying the Holocaust, it is especially striking. If he really was collaborating with the Stasi, it shines a whole new light on his time with the Red Army Faction – better known in the UK as the Baader-Meinhof gang. Mahler represented the widow of 26-year-old Ohnesorg in a civil case she brought over her husband’s death. He also led the student movement’s own investigation into the shooting. The West Berlin policeman who pulled the trigger, Karl-Heinz Kurras, was exposed as a Stasi agent two years ago. The new leaked report even suggests he deliberately fired at Ohnesorg, though he was twice cleared of deliberate homicide. If Mahler was also working for the Stasi – a fact his lawyer suggests is unlikely – does this mean he was somehow in on a plot to disrupt West Germany by introducing violence into the student protests? Mahler, who was a little older than the other West German student leaders in the late 1960s, also represented Rudi Dutschke, the most prominent spokesman for the German student movement. Later on, when Mahler was in prison for bank robberies and assisting a prison escape, Gerhard Schröder, Germany’s future chancellor, became his lawyer. If the leaked investigation into Ohnesorg’s death is right, Mahler only stopped being a Stasi informant when he founded the Red Army Faction with Ulrike Meinhof, Andreas Baader and Gudrun Ensslin in 1970. He was arrested shortly afterwards and spent all of the 1970s in jail. The true circumstances of Ohnesorg’s death are important because the killing is widely credited as the catalyst for the radicalisation of the West German left, including those who went on to form the Red Army Faction. According to Bild am Sonntag, state prosecutors decided to reopen the investigation into the death in May 2009 after Kurras was outed as a Stasi agent. The newspaper claims the leaked report shows the East German secret police played a bigger role in the shooting than was previously thought. The GDR is already known to have tried to undermine West Germany by funding radical magazines and newspapers plotting its downfall, and, in the late1970s and 80s, offering sanctuary to Red Army Faction terrorists on the run. Mahler’s current lawyer, Mirko Röder, could not be reached by phone on Monday. But the Bild am Sonntag quoted the Berlin-based Röder as saying: “If the prosecutors’ findings point to him [Mahler] being an IM, I’m surprised how deeply the Stasi were able to infiltrate the political incidents of West Germany back then.” This is another intriguing piece in the wildly unusual jigsaw that is Mahler’s life, said Hans Kundnani, the author of Utopia or Auschwitz, a book about Germany’s 1968 generation. “Many members of the student movement who had grown up in West Germany and saw themselves as revolutionary socialists romanticised the GDR as the ‘better Germany’,” he said. “After the death of Ohnesorg, Mahler called for ‘resistance’ against the Federal Republic, which they saw as a fascist state. In that context, he may have seen the ‘anti-fascist’ GDR as a potential ally. In a sense, his whole life has been a struggle with the Nazi past.” Kundnani met Mahler when researching his book, first at a neo-Nazi retreat in Thuringia and then at his home in a Berlin suburb. “He preferred talking about Hegel than his own life,” said Kundnani. “When I asked him whether he accepted that he had changed his views since the 1960s, he said, ‘You have to see it dialectically. One changes, and at the same time one remains the same.’ ” Germany The far right Europe Helen Pidd guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …