MPs say ex-Daily Mirror editor must face questions after phone hacking allegations made on Newsnight Piers Morgan is facing calls to return to the UK to answer questions about phone hacking as the controversy over how much he knew about the practice showed no signs of abating. John Whittingdale, the Conservative MP who chairs the Commons culture, media and sport committee, said it was right that the former Daily Mirror editor should return from the United States, where he hosts a CNN chatshow. Whittingdale said: “Therese Coffey [a Tory member of the committee] said he should come back to this country to answer questions and I think that is absolutely right. He certainly should.” Harriet Harman, Labour’s deputy leader, said Morgan had questions to answer, citing a column he wrote five years ago in which he wrote that he had once been played a message left on a mobile phone belonging to Heather Mills. Harman said: “Hacking is a criminal offence and … every allegation has got to be thoroughly investigated by the police. We started off with just the News of the World … it’s clearly been much more widespread than people have been prepared to admit.” Morgan, who edited the Daily Mirror for nearly 10 years until 2004, said in a Daily Mail column in 2006 that he had heard the message, which was left by Sir Paul McCartney on Mills’s phone after the couple had an argument. He said the former Beatle sounded “lonely, miserable and desperate”. Mills told the BBC’s Newsnight this week that a senior journalist on a paper owned by Trinity Mirror, the Daily Mirror’s parent company, conceded to her in 2001 that he had obtained information about an apology left by McCartney by listening to her phone messages. According to Mills, the journalist rang her and “started quoting verbatim the messages from my machine”. She said she challenged him, saying: “You’ve obviously hacked my phone and if you do anything with this story … I’ll go to the police.” Mills said he responded: “OK, OK, yeah, we did hear it on your voice messages, I won’t run it.” Morgan has consistently denied he has ever hacked a phone, ordered any of his journalists to do so, or published any story obtained from the hacking of a phone. He issued a statement through CNN, for whom he records Tonight with Piers Morgan, in response to Mills’s claims pointing out that a high-court judge had described her as a unreliable witness. “No doubt everyone will take this and other instances of somewhat extravagant claims by Ms Mills into account in assessing what credibility and platform her assertions are given,” he said. Morgan used Twitter to ridicule the prominence of the story on Thursday, posting: “Morning all, lovely day in LA. Anything going on back home in UK? Seems a bit quiet over there … so heart-warming that everyone in UK’s missing me so much they want me to come home.” Trinity Mirror, which also owns the Sunday Mirror and the People, said on Thursday: “All our journalists work within the criminal law and the PCC code of conduct and we have seen no evidence to suggest otherwise.” Meanwhile the FBI is widening its investigation of News Corporation’s activities within the US to look at whether allegations of computer hacking by one of its subsidiaries was an isolated case or part of a “larger pattern of behaviour”, Time magazine is reporting. Time suggests that the FBI inquiry has been extended from a relatively narrow look at alleged malpractices by News Corp in America into a more general inquiry into whether the company used possibly illegal strongarm tactics to browbeat rival firms, following allegations of computer hacking made by retail advertising company Floorgraphics. In a civil lawsuit against News Corp in 2004 Floorgraphics told a court that its website had been breached 11 times over four months without authorisation. The source of the alleged hacking was traced back to an IP address registered to News America in Connecticut . Piers Morgan Phone hacking Newspapers & magazines National newspapers Newspapers United States James Robinson guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …For a second straight day CNN ignored the newest phone hacking accusations made against its 9 p.m. host Piers Morgan. Major media outlets, including Bloomberg News , msnbc.com , and CBS have reported the story, but Morgan's current employer, CNN, has remained mum on the allegations. On Wednesday, the ex-wife of Paul McCartney accused a journalist from a British newspaper group of hacking her phone back in 2001, while CNN's Piers Morgan was the editor of one of the group's papers. That prompted a statement by Morgan labeling her claims as “unsubstantiated” and again denying that he hacked phones or ordered anyone else to do so during his time as editor.
Continue reading …Again: Can someone in the spineless, co-opted corporate media please do their job and explain to us why the unAmerican pledge to Pope Grover takes precedence over oath of office? Instead of just saying, “That’s the way it is,” look a little deeper and ask why Grover gets to pick the Super Committee . I mean, is it a good thing that our Congress is dictated to by a little tin god? All hail, Caesar! Norquist said he has already been assured by “the right people” that House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) will not choose anyone willing to give ground on raising taxes , and he is confident enough to leave town on Wednesday for August vacation. Norquist said he would like Boehner to name House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp (R-Mich.) and House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-Mich.). He said he would be “fine” with leadership using the opportunity to give a conservative freshman the chance to shine, mentioning Rep. Kristi Noem (R-S.D.). Similarly, with respect to the Senate, Norquist can see McConnell appointing a young gun like Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) to the panel to give him a bigger platform. He said he would like to see Sens. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) appointed. Norquist does not want to see former Gang of Six Sens. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) or Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.) on board because they made “troubling” statements in support of revenue increases during the deficit negotiations this spring. He said that if Gang of Six Sen. Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) made stronger commitments to oppose taxes, he could be OK with that appointment.
Continue reading …The Hill reports : The Senate will pass the House’s bill to fund the Federal Aviation Administration through September to end the week-and-a-half long partial shutdown of the agency, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid announced Thursday.
Continue reading …Louis Magazzu, whom I shall nickname “Louis the Lewd,” was a Democratic County Freeholder in Cumberland County, New Jersey. A ” freeholder ” is the Garden State equivalent of a county commissioner. His position is in the past tense because Louis the Lewd resigned on Tuesday after nude pictures of himself sent to a woman with whom he had online correspondence for several years were published. Let's compare how the Aliyah Shahid at the New York Daily News and Beth DeFalco at the Associated Press covered Magazzu's resignation. First, from the Daily News , which isn't exactly considered strongly conservative or particularly anti-Democrat: Louis Magazzu, Democrat New Jersey freeholder, resigns after nude photos, sexts surface It's Anthony Weiner, Jersey edition. Garden State Democrat Louis Magazzu announced his resignation Tuesday after nude pictures he sent to a woman he had been corresponding with were posted on a Republican activist's website. At least two of the photos showed the Cumberland County freeholder's crotch, two showed him dressed to the nines in a suit, and a fifth showed him waist up without a shirt. The tawdry photos – taken in front of a mirror with a smartphone – are similar to those that led to Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-Queens-Brooklyn) to call it quits in June. Magazzu, a 53-year-old lawyer who had been an elected county official for more than a decade, apologized to his friends, family and constituents in a statement, but indicated he had been set up. “I did not know that she was working with an avowed political enemy to distribute these pictures,” Magazzu said of the Chicago woman he corresponded with online with for several years but claims he never met. “I have retained counsel to determine what laws may have been broken by the unauthorized distribution of those pictures.” … Unlike Weiner, who waited weeks before resigning, Magazzu stepped down just a day after the photo scandal hit local papers. Carl Johnson, of Milville, who posted the photos on Magazzuwatch.com, said he would consider taking down the photos. Shahid's writeup is a good example of fair and balanced coverage. It appropriately tags Louis the Lewd as a Dem in the headline and first paragraph, but also identified the nature of Magazzu's antagonist right off the bat. Now let's look at how the AP's DeFalco and the wire service's headline writers proactively worked to defer tagging Magazzu as a Dem, while making sure that readers knew right off the bat that this was a GOP activist's doing: NJ pol resigns after nude photos appear online [1] A politician who emailed a woman nude photos of himself [4] that were later posted on a GOP activist's website [2] announced his resignation Tuesday and said he'll consider all legal options to have the pictures taken down. In an emailed statement, Cumberland County freeholder Louis Magazzu apologized to his friends, family and constituents but indicated that he thought he was being set up. The 53-year-old Democratic lawyer, [3] who'd been an elected county official since 1997, said he sent the photos to a woman with whom he corresponded online for several years and that she requested the photos. At least two of the photos revealed his crotch, two photos showed him fully dressed in a suit and a fifth showed him from the waist up, shirtless. “I did not know that she was working with an avowed political enemy to distribute these pictures,” he said. “I have retained counsel to determine what laws may have been broken by the unauthorized distribution of those pictures.” The pictures appear [4] to show Magazzu standing naked in front of a mirror photographing himself with a Blackberry – photos similar to those that led U.S. Rep. Anthony Weiner of New York to resign in June. The seven-term Democratic congressman acknowledged sending sexually explicit messages and photos to several women online. Johnson said on his website that the woman “contacted me out of the blue this year.” He said he told her to contact the media, and when none seemed interested, he “reluctantly revealed them.” So, let's see, AP: [1] — Party affiliation of Democratic politician tarred by scandal not in headline, check. [2] — Party affiliation of said Democrat's enemy identified in first sentence, check. [3] — Waiting as long as possible to avoid identifying Democrat politician's political party in hopes that most print readers, online readers, and new outlets will stop after the first two paragraphs, check. [4] — Adding an element of doubt where none is warranted by including the word “appear,” check. Item [4] is particularly risible, as Louis the Lewd has admitted that the photos are indeed of him: He told The Daily Journal he forwarded the photos, along with others in which he is fully clothed, to an unidentified woman. The explicit shots were sent at her request after he sent other pictures in which he is fully dressed, Magazzu said. Readers should additionally note that the Daily News identified the Magaazuwatch.com web site, and AP's DeFalco, apparently in the interest of ensuring that readers don't learn anything beyond what the wire service is willing to tell them, did not. Separate from AP's awful handling of the story (unless it happens to have been among those contacted), I'd like to know which media outlets decided that Magazzu's conduct wasn't news. If not, why not? Obviously it was news, because, guess what? You're covering it now. The contrast between a media outlet doing its job of informing the public and one which seems to see part of its mission as covering for Democratic corruption and misconduct at every turn could hardly be clearer. Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com .
Continue reading …Leader of India’s ruling Congress party’s youth wing will sit on committee to look after affairs in her absence Rahul Gandhi, the crown prince of Indian politics, took a step nearer to power on Thursday when it was announced that his mother Sonia, the leader of the ruling Congress party, had suddenly gone abroad for medical reasons and charged the 41-year-old with running the organisation in her absence. The country immediately plunged into a frenzy of speculation about the nature of the 64-year-old Sonia Gandhi’s condition and whether her departure meant the beginning of the long awaited transfer of power to her son. Though Gandhi holds no official executive position, she is widely viewed as immensely powerful. Her son is a member of parliament and head of the Congress party’s youth wing, which has run India for much of the last seven decades. Along with a senior aide, a party spokesman and the current defence minister, Rahul Gandhi will now be temporarily responsible for the administration of the single most powerful entity in Indian politics. “Rahul in charge” was the headline running on the local New Delhi television channel. Janardhan Dwivedi, who will sit with Rahul on the committee, said Sonia Gandhi had been recently diagnosed with a medical condition and, on the advice of her doctors, had travelled abroad for surgery. “She will be away for two or three weeks. She has constituted a group to look after party affairs in her absence,” Diwedi said. Her son is a controversial figure in India. He never gives interviews and shuns the febrile Indian political media circuit, preferring to build a political career through his work as a party organiser and through spectacular public appearances which opponents dismiss as stunts. In recent months Rahul Gandhi has been arrested after driving on a motorbike around communities of farmers protesting against land seizures on the outskirts of Delhi and walked 50 miles over four days in the summer heat in a remote part of northern India on a trip to “meet the real people” of India. He slept and ate in modest homes. On a recent visit to Mumbai, Gandhi outmanoeuvred local rightwing groups who opposed his presence in the city by shunning the large and disruptive motorcade preferred by Indian politicians in favour of the overcrowded public trains to reach the city from the airport. Such actions have successfully raised Gandhi’s profile and appear to have consolidated popular support among rural voters, a key constituency for Congress. Tikam Singh, a 40-year-old farmer from the village of Gujran Atta, Uttar Pradesh, met Gandhi earlier this summer during the violent land protests. Singh said the politician “understood that the lands are being taken away forcibly”. “He has said that he is with us. He shared roti [bread] and daal [lentil curry] with us. We are with him because at least he is someone who is there for us. Rahul-ji was very understanding,” Singh said, using the honorific “ji” after Gandhi’s first name. However, Siddharth Varadarajan, editor of The Hindu, said that the real importance was not that Rahul Gandhi had been nominated but that Sonia Gandhi might be ailing. “The timing of this announcement means she is telling us whose hands she wants the party to be in should she be no longer in a position to run things,” he said. Some analysts have even raised the possibility that Sonia Gandhi might not return to politics, though Congress party officials said there was “totally, absolutely no question” of any immediate retirement. Rahul Gandhi is the great-grandson of Jawaharlal Nehru, who led India after independence, the grandson of Indira Gandhi, who ruled India from 1966 to 1977, and the son of former prime minister Rajiv Gandhi, who was killed by a suicide bomber in 1991. His parents met at Cambridge University. Politics in India remains deeply dynastic and many within Congress view Rahul Gandhi as the only figure capable of leading the party to a third successive electoral victory in 2014. The current administration, under the ageing Manmohan Singh, has been overwhelmed by corruption scandals and increasing economic problems. Sonia Gandhi India Jason Burke guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Leader of India’s ruling Congress party’s youth wing will sit on committee to look after affairs in her absence Rahul Gandhi, the crown prince of Indian politics, took a step nearer to power on Thursday when it was announced that his mother Sonia, the leader of the ruling Congress party, had suddenly gone abroad for medical reasons and charged the 41-year-old with running the organisation in her absence. The country immediately plunged into a frenzy of speculation about the nature of the 64-year-old Sonia Gandhi’s condition and whether her departure meant the beginning of the long awaited transfer of power to her son. Though Gandhi holds no official executive position, she is widely viewed as immensely powerful. Her son is a member of parliament and head of the Congress party’s youth wing, which has run India for much of the last seven decades. Along with a senior aide, a party spokesman and the current defence minister, Rahul Gandhi will now be temporarily responsible for the administration of the single most powerful entity in Indian politics. “Rahul in charge” was the headline running on the local New Delhi television channel. Janardhan Dwivedi, who will sit with Rahul on the committee, said Sonia Gandhi had been recently diagnosed with a medical condition and, on the advice of her doctors, had travelled abroad for surgery. “She will be away for two or three weeks. She has constituted a group to look after party affairs in her absence,” Diwedi said. Her son is a controversial figure in India. He never gives interviews and shuns the febrile Indian political media circuit, preferring to build a political career through his work as a party organiser and through spectacular public appearances which opponents dismiss as stunts. In recent months Rahul Gandhi has been arrested after driving on a motorbike around communities of farmers protesting against land seizures on the outskirts of Delhi and walked 50 miles over four days in the summer heat in a remote part of northern India on a trip to “meet the real people” of India. He slept and ate in modest homes. On a recent visit to Mumbai, Gandhi outmanoeuvred local rightwing groups who opposed his presence in the city by shunning the large and disruptive motorcade preferred by Indian politicians in favour of the overcrowded public trains to reach the city from the airport. Such actions have successfully raised Gandhi’s profile and appear to have consolidated popular support among rural voters, a key constituency for Congress. Tikam Singh, a 40-year-old farmer from the village of Gujran Atta, Uttar Pradesh, met Gandhi earlier this summer during the violent land protests. Singh said the politician “understood that the lands are being taken away forcibly”. “He has said that he is with us. He shared roti [bread] and daal [lentil curry] with us. We are with him because at least he is someone who is there for us. Rahul-ji was very understanding,” Singh said, using the honorific “ji” after Gandhi’s first name. However, Siddharth Varadarajan, editor of The Hindu, said that the real importance was not that Rahul Gandhi had been nominated but that Sonia Gandhi might be ailing. “The timing of this announcement means she is telling us whose hands she wants the party to be in should she be no longer in a position to run things,” he said. Some analysts have even raised the possibility that Sonia Gandhi might not return to politics, though Congress party officials said there was “totally, absolutely no question” of any immediate retirement. Rahul Gandhi is the great-grandson of Jawaharlal Nehru, who led India after independence, the grandson of Indira Gandhi, who ruled India from 1966 to 1977, and the son of former prime minister Rajiv Gandhi, who was killed by a suicide bomber in 1991. His parents met at Cambridge University. Politics in India remains deeply dynastic and many within Congress view Rahul Gandhi as the only figure capable of leading the party to a third successive electoral victory in 2014. The current administration, under the ageing Manmohan Singh, has been overwhelmed by corruption scandals and increasing economic problems. Sonia Gandhi India Jason Burke guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Raft of new appointments following resignation of army, navy and air force commanders revives democracy hopes For decades the Turkish military has run rings round the government, staging coups whenever it was displeased and exerting a powerful, largely unaccountable grip on society. All this is changing, say experts, with the announcement on Thursday of a raft of new appointments among the top brass of the armed forces following the mass resignations last week of the commanders of the army, navy and air force. They quit on 29 July, along with General Isik Kosaner, chief of general staff, over the detention of 250 officers accused of plotting to overthrow the Islamic-rooted government. The surprise move had raised concerns about the stability and state of democracy in Turkey, with some fearing another military intervention in Turkish politics. Others predicted the “Islamisation” of Turkey’s secular armed forces by Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s government. Some worried there were also international ramifications: Turkey’s army is the second-biggest in Nato, smaller only than the US. But after the appointment of new generals on Thursday, the reaction was largely optimistic, with analysts arguing that the reshuffle might be the catalyst for democratic reforms. “[The resignations are] another step in the retreat of the Turkish military to the proper institutional role and functions that befit a democratic country,” wrote Soli Özel, professor for international relations at the Istanbul Kadir Has university. He, like many, was cheered by the government’s refusal to bow to the demands of the outgoing commanders, who had asked not just for the release of their military colleagues, but also their promotion. “It can be seen as the surrender of the military in a war they started losing a long time ago,” said Gencer Özcan, professor for international relations at Bilgi University. “[It] shows that the Turkish military no longer poses any kind of threat to the civilian government.” This is no small matter in Turkey, where the military staged coups in 1960, 1971, 1980 and 1997, forcing the ruling government to resign. The wounds of the violent 1980 coup in particular are yet to heal for many Turks, when the army rolled into towns and cities and arrested at least 650,000 people. Among the detainees, 230,000 were tried, 14,000 were stripped of citizenship and 50 were executed . Many thousands were tortured. “The resignations are emblematic of the shift in recent years of the power relationship between the military and the civilian establishment in favour of the civilian establishment,” said Sinan Ülgen, chair of the Centre for Economic and Foreign Policy Studies, an independent thinktank. “Very few people in Turkey are against this shift.” Ülgen said the power balance started tipping in favour of the political elite just over four years ago. On 29 April 2007 the military published a text on its website– the so-called e-coup – bluntly warning the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) against putting up Abdullah Gül, then foreign minister, as its candidate in the upcoming presidential elections. The government firmly rebuked this last serious attempt of the military to meddle in politics, Gül became president and the AKP walked away stronger and more confident, winning a landslide victory in subsequent national elections. Critics of the government argue that Erdogan will now try to reform the military along his own lines, thus threatening democratic checks and balances, but not many agree. “In a democracy, military reforms are decided and implemented by the civilian government; the military simply has to obey their decisions. In that sense, members of the military cannot be ‘democratic’, as that is neither their task nor position,” said journalist Lale Kemal, who writes for Taraf, a left-leaning, anti-military newspaper. Her main concern lies with the critical stance of the main opposition Republican People’s Party (CHP): “I am sceptical about the weak support from the CHP [concerning the resignations] because this will make it harder for the AKP to implement democratic reforms.” The real problem, said Ülgen, is that previously the military played a significant – if “wholly undemocratic” – role as watchdog of the executive powers. Curtailment of this role leaves a vacuum which should be filled by a truly independent judiciary and a free media, he added – “but the government shows no sign of entrusting either body with this role”. Ülgen argues that the government has continued to curtail the independence of the press and the courts by promoting AKP sympathisers to key judicial positions and prosecuting journalists who criticise the government – most notably two writers who are in jail for writing a book about the Gülen religious movement which supports the government. The new military appointments are: Emin Bilge (navy), Mehmet Erten (air), Hayri Kivrikoglu (ground) and former military police commander Necdet Özel as chief of general staff. None of names was a major surprise, but indicated a measure of compromise. The choice of Kivrikoglu as head of the ground forces will have raised some eyebrows. When serving in northern Cyprus he refused to greet President Gül at the airport. Another candidate for the post, General Aslan Guner, was appointed to a less senior job as head of the military academies. His path to the top was believed to have been blocked by his refusal to shake the hand of the president’s wife because she was wearing a headscarf. The military plays a major role in Turkish society: children are often dressed up in military uniforms on national holidays and military service is mandatory for every able-bodied Turkish man over 20. Particularly contentious is Article 318 of the penal code, which punishes any activity which aims to “make the people lose its sympathy towards the military”. This clause, among other things, criminalises conscientious objection, a basic right explicitly recognised under the European Convention on Human Rights in July 2011. National Security lessons have been mandatory for all high schools since 1926, three years after the founding of the Republic of Turkey. While the name of these classes has been changed several times, the content and objective – to familiarise Turkish students with the army – basically remain the same. The heritage of the military coup in 1980 also weighs heavily on Turkish universities who were put under the umbrella of the Higher Education Council, founded in 1981 with the aim of centrally controlling formerly autonomous universities. Turkey Middle East Europe Helen Pidd guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Raft of new appointments following resignation of army, navy and air force commanders revives democracy hopes For decades the Turkish military has run rings round the government, staging coups whenever it was displeased and exerting a powerful, largely unaccountable grip on society. All this is changing, say experts, with the announcement on Thursday of a raft of new appointments among the top brass of the armed forces following the mass resignations last week of the commanders of the army, navy and air force. They quit on 29 July, along with General Isik Kosaner, chief of general staff, over the detention of 250 officers accused of plotting to overthrow the Islamic-rooted government. The surprise move had raised concerns about the stability and state of democracy in Turkey, with some fearing another military intervention in Turkish politics. Others predicted the “Islamisation” of Turkey’s secular armed forces by Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s government. Some worried there were also international ramifications: Turkey’s army is the second-biggest in Nato, smaller only than the US. But after the appointment of new generals on Thursday, the reaction was largely optimistic, with analysts arguing that the reshuffle might be the catalyst for democratic reforms. “[The resignations are] another step in the retreat of the Turkish military to the proper institutional role and functions that befit a democratic country,” wrote Soli Özel, professor for international relations at the Istanbul Kadir Has university. He, like many, was cheered by the government’s refusal to bow to the demands of the outgoing commanders, who had asked not just for the release of their military colleagues, but also their promotion. “It can be seen as the surrender of the military in a war they started losing a long time ago,” said Gencer Özcan, professor for international relations at Bilgi University. “[It] shows that the Turkish military no longer poses any kind of threat to the civilian government.” This is no small matter in Turkey, where the military staged coups in 1960, 1971, 1980 and 1997, forcing the ruling government to resign. The wounds of the violent 1980 coup in particular are yet to heal for many Turks, when the army rolled into towns and cities and arrested at least 650,000 people. Among the detainees, 230,000 were tried, 14,000 were stripped of citizenship and 50 were executed . Many thousands were tortured. “The resignations are emblematic of the shift in recent years of the power relationship between the military and the civilian establishment in favour of the civilian establishment,” said Sinan Ülgen, chair of the Centre for Economic and Foreign Policy Studies, an independent thinktank. “Very few people in Turkey are against this shift.” Ülgen said the power balance started tipping in favour of the political elite just over four years ago. On 29 April 2007 the military published a text on its website– the so-called e-coup – bluntly warning the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) against putting up Abdullah Gül, then foreign minister, as its candidate in the upcoming presidential elections. The government firmly rebuked this last serious attempt of the military to meddle in politics, Gül became president and the AKP walked away stronger and more confident, winning a landslide victory in subsequent national elections. Critics of the government argue that Erdogan will now try to reform the military along his own lines, thus threatening democratic checks and balances, but not many agree. “In a democracy, military reforms are decided and implemented by the civilian government; the military simply has to obey their decisions. In that sense, members of the military cannot be ‘democratic’, as that is neither their task nor position,” said journalist Lale Kemal, who writes for Taraf, a left-leaning, anti-military newspaper. Her main concern lies with the critical stance of the main opposition Republican People’s Party (CHP): “I am sceptical about the weak support from the CHP [concerning the resignations] because this will make it harder for the AKP to implement democratic reforms.” The real problem, said Ülgen, is that previously the military played a significant – if “wholly undemocratic” – role as watchdog of the executive powers. Curtailment of this role leaves a vacuum which should be filled by a truly independent judiciary and a free media, he added – “but the government shows no sign of entrusting either body with this role”. Ülgen argues that the government has continued to curtail the independence of the press and the courts by promoting AKP sympathisers to key judicial positions and prosecuting journalists who criticise the government – most notably two writers who are in jail for writing a book about the Gülen religious movement which supports the government. The new military appointments are: Emin Bilge (navy), Mehmet Erten (air), Hayri Kivrikoglu (ground) and former military police commander Necdet Özel as chief of general staff. None of names was a major surprise, but indicated a measure of compromise. The choice of Kivrikoglu as head of the ground forces will have raised some eyebrows. When serving in northern Cyprus he refused to greet President Gül at the airport. Another candidate for the post, General Aslan Guner, was appointed to a less senior job as head of the military academies. His path to the top was believed to have been blocked by his refusal to shake the hand of the president’s wife because she was wearing a headscarf. The military plays a major role in Turkish society: children are often dressed up in military uniforms on national holidays and military service is mandatory for every able-bodied Turkish man over 20. Particularly contentious is Article 318 of the penal code, which punishes any activity which aims to “make the people lose its sympathy towards the military”. This clause, among other things, criminalises conscientious objection, a basic right explicitly recognised under the European Convention on Human Rights in July 2011. National Security lessons have been mandatory for all high schools since 1926, three years after the founding of the Republic of Turkey. While the name of these classes has been changed several times, the content and objective – to familiarise Turkish students with the army – basically remain the same. The heritage of the military coup in 1980 also weighs heavily on Turkish universities who were put under the umbrella of the Higher Education Council, founded in 1981 with the aim of centrally controlling formerly autonomous universities. Turkey Middle East Europe Helen Pidd guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …