Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 529)
Syrians take to streets over Hama massacre as outrage grows

Demonstrators gather in cities across the country while Bashar al-Assad’s troops continue shelling residential areas Tens of thousands of Syrians returned to the streets to denounce President Bashar al-Assad’s regime and declare support for the residents of Hama, where an estimated 200 residents have been killed in a government assault since Sunday. Troops opened fire on crowds of demonstrators after Friday prayers, killing at least 10 people amid mounting international condemnation of the brutal tactics deployed by Assad’s forces in the five-month uprising. In Hama, tanks resumed shelling of residential districts around 4am, as people were beginning their fast for Ramadan, a resident told Associated Press. State-run Syrian TV released footage from inside Hama for the first time, showing widespread devastation on the streets. Scenes of burned-out buildings, barricaded roads and damaged cars suggest the battles have been far more intense than the regime has previously admitted. With journalists unable to operate freely in Syria it is not possible to verify claims by activists that 200 people have been killed by military shelling and sniping in the city during the last six days. The official news agency Sana claimed troops were fighting terrorist saboteurs. “Syrian Arab army units are working to restore security, stability and normal life to Hama after armed terrorist groups perpetrated acts of sabotage and killing,” Sana reported. In YouTube footage purporting to come from protesters in Hama, heavy gunfire can be heard amid improvised road blocks in the street with a tank in the background. A voice says: “Hama, 5 August 2011, severe artillery shooting in Hama … tanks incursion of Hama … gangs of Bashar al-Assad are shooting Hama neighbourhoods.” The date and name of the city are repeated. As the attack on Hama continued, protests took place throughout the country. At least seven people were killed in the Damascus suburb of Arbeen, according to the London-based Observatory for Human Rights and the Local Coordination Committees, a group that tracks protests. Another was killed in the suburb of Moaddamiya and two in the central city of Homs. “Hama, we are with you until death,” a crowd marching through the central Damascus neighbourhood of Midan shouted. In another district, Qadam, protesters carried a banner reading: “Bashar is slaughtering the people and the international community is silent.” There were also protests in the southern province of Daraa and in Deir al-Zour in the east. Other demonstrations were reported in Qamishli, near the Turkish border. There has been a near-total communications blackout in Hama but Gaëtan Vannay, a journalist with Swiss Radio , managed to enter Syria secretly and spent 10 days in the beseiged city. He was there on Sunday when Syrian forces began their attack. “Until then the demonstrations were absolutely peaceful,” he told the Guardian. “They were well-organised, the protesters were always writing new songs, coming up with new slogans against the regime. On the Thursday before the attack there were two speakers with different sound systems entertaining the crowds, playing off one another. It was very festive. On Sunday at 4.30am people gave the alarm, shouting ‘Allah u akbar (God is great)’. People lit tyre barricades to make it difficulft for the tanks and fought back with sticks, stones and molotov cocktails. The fighting lasted until around 1pm in the afternoon.” Vannay left Hama on Monday, the day tanks shelled the city’s two hospitals. “They had positioned tanks at three or four places in the city, strategic locations,” said Vannay, who saw two tank crews leave their vehicles to join the demonstrators.”When I left I met quite a few soldiers and policemen in hiding who said they had been told to kill the population or be killed by the security forces,” he said. “Sometimes we would be hiding in the same house.” Murhaf Jouejati, professor of Middle East studies at the National Defence University in Washington DC, said: “The more the Assad regime is using violence, the more the protests are growing.” “The regime’s violence is increasingly counterproductive and what is remarkable is that there is no protester fatigue.” As the death toll mounted, with US secretary of state Hillary Clinton accusing the government of killing 2,000 people since March, international outrage has grown. Clinton said on Thursday it was time to “send a very clear message to the Assad regime, the insiders there, that there’s a price to pay for this kind of abuse and attacks on their own people”. A group of UN human rights experts again called for an immediate end to the government’s use of violence against protesters. “The indiscriminate use of heavy artillery against demonstrators cannot be justified,” said Christof Heyns, the UN special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions. “No state is allowed to use its military force against an unarmed civilian population, regardless of the situation on the ground. The killings that result are clearly arbitrary executions and punishable under international law.” Even Russia has sought to distance itself from the regime. The Russian president, Dmitry Medvedev, said on Thursday he had warned Assad that he will face a “sad fate” if he fails to introduce reforms and open a dialogue with the opposition. “This is very significant,” said Jouejati. “The Assad regime is even losing its international friends. “Russia was the beacon of support for Syria in the UN security council, not willing to condemn for a long time, but even [they] are coming around.” Syria Arab and Middle East unrest Middle East Protest Bashar Al-Assad Mark Tran Paul Owen guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Syrians take to streets over Hama massacre as outrage grows

Demonstrators gather in cities across the country while Bashar al-Assad’s troops continue shelling residential areas Tens of thousands of Syrians returned to the streets to denounce President Bashar al-Assad’s regime and declare support for the residents of Hama, where an estimated 200 residents have been killed in a government assault since Sunday. Troops opened fire on crowds of demonstrators after Friday prayers, killing at least 10 people amid mounting international condemnation of the brutal tactics deployed by Assad’s forces in the five-month uprising. In Hama, tanks resumed shelling of residential districts around 4am, as people were beginning their fast for Ramadan, a resident told Associated Press. State-run Syrian TV released footage from inside Hama for the first time, showing widespread devastation on the streets. Scenes of burned-out buildings, barricaded roads and damaged cars suggest the battles have been far more intense than the regime has previously admitted. With journalists unable to operate freely in Syria it is not possible to verify claims by activists that 200 people have been killed by military shelling and sniping in the city during the last six days. The official news agency Sana claimed troops were fighting terrorist saboteurs. “Syrian Arab army units are working to restore security, stability and normal life to Hama after armed terrorist groups perpetrated acts of sabotage and killing,” Sana reported. In YouTube footage purporting to come from protesters in Hama, heavy gunfire can be heard amid improvised road blocks in the street with a tank in the background. A voice says: “Hama, 5 August 2011, severe artillery shooting in Hama … tanks incursion of Hama … gangs of Bashar al-Assad are shooting Hama neighbourhoods.” The date and name of the city are repeated. As the attack on Hama continued, protests took place throughout the country. At least seven people were killed in the Damascus suburb of Arbeen, according to the London-based Observatory for Human Rights and the Local Coordination Committees, a group that tracks protests. Another was killed in the suburb of Moaddamiya and two in the central city of Homs. “Hama, we are with you until death,” a crowd marching through the central Damascus neighbourhood of Midan shouted. In another district, Qadam, protesters carried a banner reading: “Bashar is slaughtering the people and the international community is silent.” There were also protests in the southern province of Daraa and in Deir al-Zour in the east. Other demonstrations were reported in Qamishli, near the Turkish border. There has been a near-total communications blackout in Hama but Gaëtan Vannay, a journalist with Swiss Radio , managed to enter Syria secretly and spent 10 days in the beseiged city. He was there on Sunday when Syrian forces began their attack. “Until then the demonstrations were absolutely peaceful,” he told the Guardian. “They were well-organised, the protesters were always writing new songs, coming up with new slogans against the regime. On the Thursday before the attack there were two speakers with different sound systems entertaining the crowds, playing off one another. It was very festive. On Sunday at 4.30am people gave the alarm, shouting ‘Allah u akbar (God is great)’. People lit tyre barricades to make it difficulft for the tanks and fought back with sticks, stones and molotov cocktails. The fighting lasted until around 1pm in the afternoon.” Vannay left Hama on Monday, the day tanks shelled the city’s two hospitals. “They had positioned tanks at three or four places in the city, strategic locations,” said Vannay, who saw two tank crews leave their vehicles to join the demonstrators.”When I left I met quite a few soldiers and policemen in hiding who said they had been told to kill the population or be killed by the security forces,” he said. “Sometimes we would be hiding in the same house.” Murhaf Jouejati, professor of Middle East studies at the National Defence University in Washington DC, said: “The more the Assad regime is using violence, the more the protests are growing.” “The regime’s violence is increasingly counterproductive and what is remarkable is that there is no protester fatigue.” As the death toll mounted, with US secretary of state Hillary Clinton accusing the government of killing 2,000 people since March, international outrage has grown. Clinton said on Thursday it was time to “send a very clear message to the Assad regime, the insiders there, that there’s a price to pay for this kind of abuse and attacks on their own people”. A group of UN human rights experts again called for an immediate end to the government’s use of violence against protesters. “The indiscriminate use of heavy artillery against demonstrators cannot be justified,” said Christof Heyns, the UN special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions. “No state is allowed to use its military force against an unarmed civilian population, regardless of the situation on the ground. The killings that result are clearly arbitrary executions and punishable under international law.” Even Russia has sought to distance itself from the regime. The Russian president, Dmitry Medvedev, said on Thursday he had warned Assad that he will face a “sad fate” if he fails to introduce reforms and open a dialogue with the opposition. “This is very significant,” said Jouejati. “The Assad regime is even losing its international friends. “Russia was the beacon of support for Syria in the UN security council, not willing to condemn for a long time, but even [they] are coming around.” Syria Arab and Middle East unrest Middle East Protest Bashar Al-Assad Mark Tran Paul Owen guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Syrians take to streets over Hama massacre as outrage grows

Demonstrators gather in cities across the country while Bashar al-Assad’s troops continue shelling residential areas Tens of thousands of Syrians returned to the streets to denounce President Bashar al-Assad’s regime and declare support for the residents of Hama, where an estimated 200 residents have been killed in a government assault since Sunday. Troops opened fire on crowds of demonstrators after Friday prayers, killing at least 10 people amid mounting international condemnation of the brutal tactics deployed by Assad’s forces in the five-month uprising. In Hama, tanks resumed shelling of residential districts around 4am, as people were beginning their fast for Ramadan, a resident told Associated Press. State-run Syrian TV released footage from inside Hama for the first time, showing widespread devastation on the streets. Scenes of burned-out buildings, barricaded roads and damaged cars suggest the battles have been far more intense than the regime has previously admitted. With journalists unable to operate freely in Syria it is not possible to verify claims by activists that 200 people have been killed by military shelling and sniping in the city during the last six days. The official news agency Sana claimed troops were fighting terrorist saboteurs. “Syrian Arab army units are working to restore security, stability and normal life to Hama after armed terrorist groups perpetrated acts of sabotage and killing,” Sana reported. In YouTube footage purporting to come from protesters in Hama, heavy gunfire can be heard amid improvised road blocks in the street with a tank in the background. A voice says: “Hama, 5 August 2011, severe artillery shooting in Hama … tanks incursion of Hama … gangs of Bashar al-Assad are shooting Hama neighbourhoods.” The date and name of the city are repeated. As the attack on Hama continued, protests took place throughout the country. At least seven people were killed in the Damascus suburb of Arbeen, according to the London-based Observatory for Human Rights and the Local Coordination Committees, a group that tracks protests. Another was killed in the suburb of Moaddamiya and two in the central city of Homs. “Hama, we are with you until death,” a crowd marching through the central Damascus neighbourhood of Midan shouted. In another district, Qadam, protesters carried a banner reading: “Bashar is slaughtering the people and the international community is silent.” There were also protests in the southern province of Daraa and in Deir al-Zour in the east. Other demonstrations were reported in Qamishli, near the Turkish border. There has been a near-total communications blackout in Hama but Gaëtan Vannay, a journalist with Swiss Radio , managed to enter Syria secretly and spent 10 days in the beseiged city. He was there on Sunday when Syrian forces began their attack. “Until then the demonstrations were absolutely peaceful,” he told the Guardian. “They were well-organised, the protesters were always writing new songs, coming up with new slogans against the regime. On the Thursday before the attack there were two speakers with different sound systems entertaining the crowds, playing off one another. It was very festive. On Sunday at 4.30am people gave the alarm, shouting ‘Allah u akbar (God is great)’. People lit tyre barricades to make it difficulft for the tanks and fought back with sticks, stones and molotov cocktails. The fighting lasted until around 1pm in the afternoon.” Vannay left Hama on Monday, the day tanks shelled the city’s two hospitals. “They had positioned tanks at three or four places in the city, strategic locations,” said Vannay, who saw two tank crews leave their vehicles to join the demonstrators.”When I left I met quite a few soldiers and policemen in hiding who said they had been told to kill the population or be killed by the security forces,” he said. “Sometimes we would be hiding in the same house.” Murhaf Jouejati, professor of Middle East studies at the National Defence University in Washington DC, said: “The more the Assad regime is using violence, the more the protests are growing.” “The regime’s violence is increasingly counterproductive and what is remarkable is that there is no protester fatigue.” As the death toll mounted, with US secretary of state Hillary Clinton accusing the government of killing 2,000 people since March, international outrage has grown. Clinton said on Thursday it was time to “send a very clear message to the Assad regime, the insiders there, that there’s a price to pay for this kind of abuse and attacks on their own people”. A group of UN human rights experts again called for an immediate end to the government’s use of violence against protesters. “The indiscriminate use of heavy artillery against demonstrators cannot be justified,” said Christof Heyns, the UN special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions. “No state is allowed to use its military force against an unarmed civilian population, regardless of the situation on the ground. The killings that result are clearly arbitrary executions and punishable under international law.” Even Russia has sought to distance itself from the regime. The Russian president, Dmitry Medvedev, said on Thursday he had warned Assad that he will face a “sad fate” if he fails to introduce reforms and open a dialogue with the opposition. “This is very significant,” said Jouejati. “The Assad regime is even losing its international friends. “Russia was the beacon of support for Syria in the UN security council, not willing to condemn for a long time, but even [they] are coming around.” Syria Arab and Middle East unrest Middle East Protest Bashar Al-Assad Mark Tran Paul Owen guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

As ThinkProgress points out, this is a very odd choice for this important position (unless, of course, the president really is trying to get the Republicans to like him). Yes, it’s traditional that the senators from a state make recommendations and the President chooses one. But if he’s wingnut Sen. Mike Lee’s chief legal adviser, it sure seems like he’s been giving him some peculiar legal advice: As ThinkProgress explained after news broke that Barlow was being vetted for this job, Barlow’s close association with Lee raises very serious questions about whether he can be trusted to enforce laws intended to protect ordinary Americans ability to earn a living, be safe from natural disasters and enjoy a secure retirement. Before the Senate even considers confirming Barlow to be the top federal attorney in Utah, Barlow should be required to answer a number of difficult questions about whether he shares any of Lee’s most indefensible positions on the Constitution: Will Barlow Vigorously Protect Seniors’ Right To Social Security? As a Senate candidate, Lee claimed that it is unconstitutional for the federal government to provide “ a decent retirement plan .” Barlow should disavow this radical belief before he can be confirmed. Will Barlow Vigorously Protect Seniors’ Right To Medicare? In the same speech, Lee also claimed that it is unconstitutional for the federal government to provide “ health care ” — a view that would invalidate Medicare, Medicaid, SCHIP and the Affordable Care Act. Barlow should also disavow this radical belief before he can be confirmed. Will Barlow Enforce Child Labor Laws? Lee believes that child labor laws are unconstitutional because the Constitution “was designed to be a little bit harsh.” Before Barlow can be a U.S. Attorney, he must swear under oath that he will enforce federal child labor laws without reservation. Will Barlow Enforce Food Safety Laws? In a radio interview last January, Lee said that food safety is “ not necessarily the role of the federal government .” As a U.S. Attorney, however, Barlow will be responsible for prosecuting criminal violations of laws ensuring that our food is safe to eat . Before Barlow can be a U.S. Attorney, he must swear under oath that he will enforce federal food safety laws without reservation. Does Barlow Believe That The Constitution Requires The Poor To Starve? In the same radio interview, Lee also said that federal anti-poverty programs are “not necessarily the role of the federal government” under the Constitution. Barlow should explain whether he shares his boss’ apparent belief that food stamps and similar programs are unconstitutional. Does Barlow Believe That Federal Disaster Relief Is Unconstitutional? Lee has also suggested that federal disaster relief violates the Constitution . Barlow should disavow this radical belief before he can be confirmed. Barlow’s decision to leave a successful and lucrative law practice in order to work for someone with Lee’s contempt for the Constitution raises serious concerns about Barlow’s fitness to serve as Utah’s top federal attorney. It is, of course, possible that Barlow does not share his boss’ views — indeed it is even possible that Barlow sought the U.S. Attorney job because he wanted a face-saving way to leave a job that forces him to push a dangerous and radical interpretation of the Constitution. Before Barlow can be confirmed, however, the Senate owes the people a Utah a duty to ensure that Barlow will not use his position in the Justice Department to push Mike Lee’s radical constitutional agenda.

Continue reading …

As ThinkProgress points out, this is a very odd choice for this important position (unless, of course, the president really is trying to get the Republicans to like him). Yes, it’s traditional that the senators from a state make recommendations and the President chooses one. But if he’s wingnut Sen. Mike Lee’s chief legal adviser, it sure seems like he’s been giving him some peculiar legal advice: As ThinkProgress explained after news broke that Barlow was being vetted for this job, Barlow’s close association with Lee raises very serious questions about whether he can be trusted to enforce laws intended to protect ordinary Americans ability to earn a living, be safe from natural disasters and enjoy a secure retirement. Before the Senate even considers confirming Barlow to be the top federal attorney in Utah, Barlow should be required to answer a number of difficult questions about whether he shares any of Lee’s most indefensible positions on the Constitution: Will Barlow Vigorously Protect Seniors’ Right To Social Security? As a Senate candidate, Lee claimed that it is unconstitutional for the federal government to provide “ a decent retirement plan .” Barlow should disavow this radical belief before he can be confirmed. Will Barlow Vigorously Protect Seniors’ Right To Medicare? In the same speech, Lee also claimed that it is unconstitutional for the federal government to provide “ health care ” — a view that would invalidate Medicare, Medicaid, SCHIP and the Affordable Care Act. Barlow should also disavow this radical belief before he can be confirmed. Will Barlow Enforce Child Labor Laws? Lee believes that child labor laws are unconstitutional because the Constitution “was designed to be a little bit harsh.” Before Barlow can be a U.S. Attorney, he must swear under oath that he will enforce federal child labor laws without reservation. Will Barlow Enforce Food Safety Laws? In a radio interview last January, Lee said that food safety is “ not necessarily the role of the federal government .” As a U.S. Attorney, however, Barlow will be responsible for prosecuting criminal violations of laws ensuring that our food is safe to eat . Before Barlow can be a U.S. Attorney, he must swear under oath that he will enforce federal food safety laws without reservation. Does Barlow Believe That The Constitution Requires The Poor To Starve? In the same radio interview, Lee also said that federal anti-poverty programs are “not necessarily the role of the federal government” under the Constitution. Barlow should explain whether he shares his boss’ apparent belief that food stamps and similar programs are unconstitutional. Does Barlow Believe That Federal Disaster Relief Is Unconstitutional? Lee has also suggested that federal disaster relief violates the Constitution . Barlow should disavow this radical belief before he can be confirmed. Barlow’s decision to leave a successful and lucrative law practice in order to work for someone with Lee’s contempt for the Constitution raises serious concerns about Barlow’s fitness to serve as Utah’s top federal attorney. It is, of course, possible that Barlow does not share his boss’ views — indeed it is even possible that Barlow sought the U.S. Attorney job because he wanted a face-saving way to leave a job that forces him to push a dangerous and radical interpretation of the Constitution. Before Barlow can be confirmed, however, the Senate owes the people a Utah a duty to ensure that Barlow will not use his position in the Justice Department to push Mike Lee’s radical constitutional agenda.

Continue reading …

As ThinkProgress points out, this is a very odd choice for this important position (unless, of course, the president really is trying to get the Republicans to like him). Yes, it’s traditional that the senators from a state make recommendations and the President chooses one. But if he’s wingnut Sen. Mike Lee’s chief legal adviser, it sure seems like he’s been giving him some peculiar legal advice: As ThinkProgress explained after news broke that Barlow was being vetted for this job, Barlow’s close association with Lee raises very serious questions about whether he can be trusted to enforce laws intended to protect ordinary Americans ability to earn a living, be safe from natural disasters and enjoy a secure retirement. Before the Senate even considers confirming Barlow to be the top federal attorney in Utah, Barlow should be required to answer a number of difficult questions about whether he shares any of Lee’s most indefensible positions on the Constitution: Will Barlow Vigorously Protect Seniors’ Right To Social Security? As a Senate candidate, Lee claimed that it is unconstitutional for the federal government to provide “ a decent retirement plan .” Barlow should disavow this radical belief before he can be confirmed. Will Barlow Vigorously Protect Seniors’ Right To Medicare? In the same speech, Lee also claimed that it is unconstitutional for the federal government to provide “ health care ” — a view that would invalidate Medicare, Medicaid, SCHIP and the Affordable Care Act. Barlow should also disavow this radical belief before he can be confirmed. Will Barlow Enforce Child Labor Laws? Lee believes that child labor laws are unconstitutional because the Constitution “was designed to be a little bit harsh.” Before Barlow can be a U.S. Attorney, he must swear under oath that he will enforce federal child labor laws without reservation. Will Barlow Enforce Food Safety Laws? In a radio interview last January, Lee said that food safety is “ not necessarily the role of the federal government .” As a U.S. Attorney, however, Barlow will be responsible for prosecuting criminal violations of laws ensuring that our food is safe to eat . Before Barlow can be a U.S. Attorney, he must swear under oath that he will enforce federal food safety laws without reservation. Does Barlow Believe That The Constitution Requires The Poor To Starve? In the same radio interview, Lee also said that federal anti-poverty programs are “not necessarily the role of the federal government” under the Constitution. Barlow should explain whether he shares his boss’ apparent belief that food stamps and similar programs are unconstitutional. Does Barlow Believe That Federal Disaster Relief Is Unconstitutional? Lee has also suggested that federal disaster relief violates the Constitution . Barlow should disavow this radical belief before he can be confirmed. Barlow’s decision to leave a successful and lucrative law practice in order to work for someone with Lee’s contempt for the Constitution raises serious concerns about Barlow’s fitness to serve as Utah’s top federal attorney. It is, of course, possible that Barlow does not share his boss’ views — indeed it is even possible that Barlow sought the U.S. Attorney job because he wanted a face-saving way to leave a job that forces him to push a dangerous and radical interpretation of the Constitution. Before Barlow can be confirmed, however, the Senate owes the people a Utah a duty to ensure that Barlow will not use his position in the Justice Department to push Mike Lee’s radical constitutional agenda.

Continue reading …
Police officers convicted over Katrina bridge shootings

Five current and former police officers guilty of human rights violations and trying to cover-up the New Orleans shootings Richard Adams in Washington Five New Orleans police officers have been convicted for their complicity in a series of murders and shootings of residents trying to escape the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. A jury found the five men guilty of covering up the killing of two people – including a mentally disabled man – and the wounding of four others in an elaborate plot that involved creating fake witnesses, falsifying police reports and statements, and planting a gun as evidence. While the men escaped charges of murder, the jury in New Orleans also found Robert Faulcon, Robert Gisevius, Kenneth Bowen and Anthony Villavaso guilty of civil rights violations, while the fifth, Arthur Kaufman – a sergeant who investigated the shootings – was also guilty of taking part in the cover-up. “This was a critical verdict. I cannot overstate the importance of this verdict. The power, the message it sends to the community, the healing power it has,” Jim Letten, the prosecuting US Attorney, said after the verdict was announced. The case is the most high profile of four major federal cases over the use of force by New Orleans police, and is likely to become a landmark civil rights decision. The mother of 17-year-old James Brissette, who was killed on the bridge, welcomed the verdict after “a long, hard six years.” But she questioned why the officers were not guilty of murder. “How are you able to empty a shotgun in the person and it’s not murder?” Sherrel Johnson said to the Associated Press. The shootings took place on the Danziger Bridge over the city’s Industrial Canal on 4 September 2005, as many residents tried to find food and shelter in the chaos only five days after the Category Five hurricane had battered the city and destroyed its system of levees, flooding the inner city streets. The only one of the accused to testify, former police officer Robert Faulcon, told the court he was “paralysed with fear” when he shot and killed an unarmed 40-year-old mentally disabled man, Ronald Madison, in the back with a shotgun from his patrol car. But Faulcon claimed that he believed Madison was armed. Prosecutors said Kaufman later produced a gun he owned and claimed it had been found at the scene, belonging to Madison’s brother, and invented two nonexistent witnesses to the shootings. Sergeant Kenneth Bowen was also charged with civil rights violations for kicking and beating Madison after he had already been wounded by Faulcon. Bowen, Gisevius, Faulcon and Villavaso are all charged with civil rights violations for the shooting of Brissette, the teenager killed on the eastern side of the bridge, as well as for injuring members of another family. Federal investigators reopened the investigation in 2008, which resulted in a series of guilty pleas by other New Orleans police officers involved in what was a systematic cover-up that began as soon as the shooting had stopped. The shootings were prompted by a radio call from an officer nearby, who reported that he was being fired on. Lawyers for the police officers said the men had been under fire, but no guns allegedly belonging to civilians were ever recovered from the scene. Four people were injured in the shootings on the eastern side of Danziger Bridge: Susan Bartholomew, then 38 years old, and her 44-year-old husband, Leonard Bartholomew. Their teenage daughter, Lesha Bartholomew, was injured, as was their nephew, Jose Holmes. United States Gun crime Hurricane Katrina Richard Adams guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
NYT Downplays Own Poll Showing More Think Spending Cuts Didn’t Go Far Enough

The New York Times on Friday downplayed results in its own poll that found 44 percent of respondents think the cuts in the debt deal didn't go far enough, versus only 15 percent who said “too far.” In a

Continue reading …
Chile student protests explode into violence

Riot police clash with protesters calling for education reform as anger with Sebastiàn Piñera’s government boils over It began as a series of peaceful protests calling for reform of the Chilean government’s education system, with students staging mass kiss-ins, dressing up in superhero costumes and running laps around the presidential palace. But on Thursday these surreal protests exploded into violence as school and university students clashed with police and seized a TV station, demanding the right to a live broadcast in order to express their demands. The Chilean winter, as it is being called, appears to have captured the public mood, just as the Arab spring did six months ago. After a day of street clashes, 874 people had been arrested and department store in the capital was smouldering after being attacked by protesters. Outrage against the rightwing government of Sebastiàn Piñera boiled over, with polls showing he is more unpopular than any leader since the fall of former dictator Augusto Pinochet. Striking school students led the charge as they tried to march on the presidential palace early on Thursday, only to be thwarted by hundreds of police in riot gear and clouds of teargas. Tucapel Jiménez, a member of the Chilean congress, called for sanctions against government authorities who authorised what he called “brutal repression” by riot police. “This is unacceptable, the centre of Santiago is a state of siege,” said university student leader Camila Vallejo, tears rolling down her face after being doused in teargas. “The right to congregate has been violated.” “I don’t see any other solution than a general referendum,” said Giorgio Jackson, president of the Catholic University student union as he described the distance between student demands and the government offer. “There are some points of agrement, but clearly there are other points that are very relevant and in which we have grand differences.” News coverage of students being gassed and hauled off buses by police squads led Vallejo to call for the resignation of Rodrigo Hinzpeter, Chile’s interior minister. Government officials insisted the students did not have a permit to march and defended the police reaction as necessary to maintain business as usual in Santiago. Government spokesman Andrés Chadwick estimated vandalism damage at $2m. Marches were held in other big cities, including Valparaíso, Concepción and Temuco. Protests continued into the evening with vandalism and bonfires in various parts of the capital, snarling traffic and highlighting the growing wave of discontent. La Polar, a retail chain recently charged with saddling consumers with outrageous interest rates on overdue accounts, was set alight. The torching was widely denounced by protest groups, but was the latest evidence that long dormant Chilean youth are rebelling against the orthodox free market ideology that dominates everyday Chilean life. In recent years, for example, it was common for private hospitals to impose a 100% surcharge for babies born outside business hours. Students have long insisted for-profit universities and schools should receive no government subsidies. The protest movement, organised largely through Facebook and Twitter, has shaken the Chilean political establishment as up to 100,000 students, usually costumed and peaceful, have marched. With a mix of music and fancy dress, the students have used the streets of the capital as a stage for acts ranging from a 3,000- person re-enactmant of Michael Jackson’s Thriller dance to a “besa-thon”, where young couples kissed for hours in front of La Moneda, the presidential palace. For two months hundreds of high schools have been seized by teenage students. Despite warnings from the government that tens of thousands of students would be forced to repeat the entire school year, high schoolers continue to demand an end to for-profit educational institutions, lower interest rates on student loans and a bus pass valid year round. An opinion poll on Thursday put Piñera’s popularity at 26%. Opposition coalition La Concertacion had an approval rating of just 16% as the range of popular complaints appears to grow daily. One year ago Chile was celebrating its new-found unity and the Piñera administration was lauded by the world media for the teamwork used to save 33 trapped copper miners. Today the heroes are the student leaders, including Vallejo, who wields enormous political power. Piñera has sacked his education minister and promised billions in new government spending for education in an unsuccesful attempt to quell the protests. After being teargassed on Thursday, Vallejo called on citizens to show support for the striking students by banging pots and pans at 9pm – a reminder of the call to the streets used in the Pinochet era. Her call spread like wildfire on social networks and led to a night of clanging celebrations, spontaneous street festivals and a national realisation that Chile is living a historical moment, with a movement that cuts across traditional social and class boundaries. Chile Protest Jonathan Franklin guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Phone hacking: police who took tip-off fees to be investigated by taxman

HMRC crackdown means officers who accepted payments from newspapers or private investigators face prosecution and fines Police officers who allegedly took payments from newspapers and private investigators could face hefty fines and criminal prosecution after it emerged HM Revenue & Customs is reopening personal tax records to check if payments were fully disclosed. It is understood HMRC has already begun probing self-assessment forms from previous years in the wake of new information obtained amid the phone-hacking revelations. Last month Sir Paul Stephenson, the outgoing Metropolitan police commissioner, said documents provided by News International appear to include information on “inappropriate payments” to police officers. It was reported that the company provided the Met with details of payments made by the News of the World to senior officers between 2003 and 2007. Under HMRC rules any payments earned in connection with an individual’s employment are required to be disclosed for tax purposes, even if the payment is deemed illegal. An HMRC spokesperson said he could not confirm the nature or extent of any investigation into a private individual’s tax affairs. But he confirmed that HMRC will act on any new information and that illegal earnings can still be liable for tax. Action to recover tax from police officers paid illegal tip-off fees relies on the precedent set by the “Miss Whiplash” prostitution case of the early 1990s, which has since entered the HMRC rule book. Miss Whiplash, who also went by the name of Lindi St Clair, was pursued for £112,000 in unpaid income tax in the late 1980s. It culminated in a court case in 1990 where she argued that since it was illegal to live on immoral earnings, taxing her would be committing an offence. But she lost the case and was subsequently made bankrupt. An HMRC spokesman said: “If you receive money in connection with your employment then it is liable for income tax. Illegality is irrelevant.” Over the past year HMRC has intensified investigations into alleged tax cheats and promised to increase the number of prosecutions. Since April HMRC has had powers to name and shame anyone found to have deliberately evaded £25,000 or more in tax. The scheme will see names, addresses and details of the evasion made public. But those who come clean can avoid having their details published. Earlier this year the government gave HMRC with an additional £900m to fund more investigations into tax evasion. The aim is to raise an additional £7bn in tax each year by 2014/15. HMRC has also gained new powers to inspect taxpayers’ records and documents. In a typical investigation it will examine income and earnings dating back six years. If it discovers an individual has knowingly submitted an inaccurate return or document, or taken active steps to conceal earnings, it can demand repayment of the tax, plus interest and a penalty of up to 100% of the unpaid tax. The department recently announced the targeting of the restaurant industry with a new task force dedicated to detecting tax and national insurance evasion. But it added that criminal prosecutions were reserved only for the most serious cases of high level fraud. Police Phone hacking Tax avoidance Corporate governance Tax Newspapers & magazines Patrick Collinson guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …