Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 518)
Newsweek Puts Picture of Michele Bachmann on Cover That Makes Her Look Crazy

The August 15 issue of Newsweek has a cover story about Congresswoman Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.). If Gawker is right , she's not going to like the picture the magazine used: Congresswoman and Republican presidential candidate/shoo-in Michele Bachmann's made the cover of the latest Cosmo Newsweek—an honor that comes with a new if not entirely original nickname (“the Queen of Rage”) and complimentary #QueenOfRage Twitter hashtag. Too bad the photographer startled her like that, eh? Ha ha, just kidding—they don't call her CrazyEyes for nothing. The Village Voice is also reporting this Sunday. Exactly what were the editors thinking putting this kind of a picture of a sitting Congresswoman and presidential candidate on their cover? *****Update: This is accurate. Newsweek tweeted this picture to its followers Sunday morning.

Continue reading …
The GOP’s Broken Record on Job Creation – More of the Same in Their Weekly Address

Click here to view this media Wash, rinse, lie, repeat. That was about what we got from New York Rep. Michael Grimm in this week’s GOP Weekly Address. Par for the course, it’s more of their broken record on job creation; more tax cuts, deregulation, Washington spends to much, the confidence fairy and their insane proposal to pass their Paul Ryan plan on steroids balanced budget amendment which they know there is no chance in hell of ever passing. We’ve already seen that their grand plans for job creation didn’t work under the Bush administration where we were losing as many as 700,000 jobs a month at the end of his term. And the stimulus plan didn’t work as well as it should have because Republicans wouldn’t allow it to get through the Senate unless a good part of it was tax cuts. And of course none of these Republicans will admit that right wing governors all over the country purging government jobs at the expense of tax breaks for corporations has a great deal to do with why our unemployment numbers look so bad right now. While it’s become obvious that the Republican Party is doing its best to make sure the employment problem in America is as bleak as they possibly can to keep President Obama from being reelected, which is their goal according to their leader in the Senate Mitch McConnell, they’ve still got the nerve to come on the air day after day and pretend their party cares one iota about job creation in the United States as Grimm did here in their weekly response. Transcript via the LA Times below the fold. Hello, I’m Congressman Michael Grimm from the great state of New York, proudly representing Staten Island and parts of Brooklyn. After serving my country in combat with the United States Marine Corps and deep undercover with the FBI, I decided to go out on my own and start a small business. I’ve seen firsthand how politicians and bureaucrats can make it harder to meet a payroll and create jobs. The latest jobs report shows that President Obama’s ‘stimulus’-driven policies are simply not working. The overspending, overtaxing, and over-regulating coming out of Washington is creating uncertainty and holding our job creators back. Every day, I hear the frustration in the voices of my neighbors and constituents who ask ‘where are the jobs?’ and this reminds me, this is not the country we grew up in. The good news is that we can, and will, get it back. if we change course. That’s why Speaker Boehner told President Obama we would not grant his request to increase the national debt limit unless we cut spending by a larger amount. And we wouldn’t accept any tax increases, which would destroy jobs. The Budget Control Act signed into law this week takes a step in the right direction. I voted for this legislation, but I have to be quite honest in telling you that it’s far from perfect. The cuts and reforms do not go nearly far enough. But it’s a reasonable and responsible approach which includes spending cuts larger than the debt limit hike; common sense caps on future government spending; and no tax increases. It puts us on a track to fix our fiscal problems, which will provide more confidence for employers in America, the very people we expect to reinvest in our economy and create jobs. Still, this is no time for celebration. We can celebrate when our budget is balanced, our debt is under control, and our economy is back to creating jobs again. There is a lot of work to be done. This fall, as a result of the Budget Control Act, lawmakers of both parties will be working on legislation to produce trillions of dollars in further deficit reduction through necessary spending cuts. While that work is being done, the House and Senate will also be voting on a Balanced Budget Amendment, something Republicans insisted on as part of the Budget Control Act. There’s no better way to provide certainty to the private sector and control spending over the long haul than through a Balanced Budget Amendment. To help lift our crushing burden once and for all, both parties should come together this fall and send a Balanced Budget Amendment to the states. We were right to the hold the president accountable on the debt limit, because he’s already back to proposing more ‘stimulus’ spending, higher taxes, and even more regulations. Doubling down on the same failed policies is not the answer. Republicans are focused on implementing a strong roadmap for job creation that reduces burdensome regulations, calls for a simpler and fairer tax code, and expands American energy production. These are the kinds of common-sense solutions that would get government out of the way and give our job creators the certainty they need to invest, plan, and create jobs. Many of these proposals have already passed the House and are waiting on action from the Democratic-led Senate. You can review all the details of our plan at Jobs.GOP.gov Listen, we know we have all the tools and resources we need to grow our economy and rebuild this great nation: the relentless work ethic of the American workforce, innovation and the entrepreneurial spirit and courage to succeed. So my questions for Washington are this: how many more jobs reports will it take before we change course? What will it take for all of us to just say ‘enough’? For the sake of our economy, I’m urging the president to wake up to reality, abandon his failed policies, and join Republicans in the hard work needed to turn our country around and create jobs. Calling on both parties to come together and send a Balanced Budget Amendment to the states would be a good start. We need less politics and more common sense if we’re going to save our country from financial ruin and restore a thriving economy for our children and grandchildren. Thank you, God bless America.

Continue reading …
MoveOn.org Jumps on Kerry’s ‘Tea Party Downgrade’ Bandwagon

John Kerry's claim on Sunday's “Meet the Press” that Standard and Poor's U.S. credit rating decision Friday is a “Tea Party Downgrade” is already catching on in liberal circles. The far-left MoveOn.org has taken it on as a rallying cry: This “tea party downgrade” is a shameful blow to our nation’s honor and risks throwing us right back into recession. Worst of all? It was completely avoidable. But when given the choice between extremist posturing and responsible leadership, tea party Republicans chose wrong. And now, amazingly, they’re trying to pin the blame on Democrats . 1 We have to set the record straight. Can you share this image with your friends and family today? The folks at the perilously liberal website Daily Kos have also gotten into the act. If you wondered how the Obama-loving media were going to deflect blame for this downgrade away from the President and his Party, now you know. (H/T NB reader Jammie Younce)

Continue reading …
Europe’s bank acts to ease debt crisis and calm markets

European Central Bank pledges to buy government bonds from Italy and Spain after day of frantic discussions The European Central Bank has moved to halt Europe’s runaway debt crisis by pledging to buy government bonds from Italy and Spain. The move to prop up Europe’s struggling nations came after a day of frantic discussions between the finance ministers of the world’s leading economies. Markets open for the first time since Standard & Poor’s decision to cut the US’s credit rating from AAA late on Friday. In a statement, the ECB said it welcomed announcements by Spain and Italy of “new measures and reforms” aimed at the financial problems and urged both governments to roll them out swiftly. The agreement of the bank’s policy-making governing council is a watershed moment for the ECB. The central bank has so far insisted that the main responsibility for acting lies with national governments. But last week a more modest bond buying effort failed to halt the European slide. The ECB said it had taken note of a statement by France and Germany released on Sunday stressing their commitment to European financial reforms. Silvio Berlusconi’s government cobbled together an emergency austerity package for Italy late on Friday to placate the bond markets. Italy’s borrowing costs shot up last week amid fears that its debts have become unsustainable. Investors were nervously awaiting the opening of the Tokyo Stock Exchange after the announcement, the first test of the move ahead of the opening of European and US markets. In the UK, there are growing fears that the crisis could shatter fragile consumer and business confidence and increase the risk that the already weak economy plunges into a double-dip recession. David Blanchflower, a former member of the Bank of England’s monetary policy committee, said he believes there may have to be a fresh round of emergency measures – including quantitative easing – perhaps as soon as this week. “I would not be the least bit surprised if the Bank of England has to hold an emergency meeting in the next week,” he told the Guardian. “If this carries on, we’re going to see further loans to the banks, further rescues of the banks. This is 2008 all over again.” A Treasury source said: “We have contingency plans in place. We are watching the banks very closely but there is not cause for alarm.” He also stressed that Britain’s financial system is more resilient than during the banking crisis. George Osborne, the chancellor, said the current turmoil showed that Britain’s approach was the right one. “Individual countries need to demonstrate beyond doubt that they have credible plans to deal with excessive deficits, improve competitiveness and strengthen banking systems,” he said in an editorial in the Telegraph. “In this respect, Britain’s experience contains an invaluable lesson for all developed economies: it is possible to earn credibility and get ahead of the markets through decisive action.” Robert Law, managing director, European banks equity research at Nomura, said the problems in the eurozone were more of a concern than those relating to the US downgrade. He said the markets were looking for “permanent solution” to the eurozone rather than just purchases of bonds. “The UK banks are less involved,” he said. But, he noted: “The Italian government bond market is the third largest in the world and the sums involved are potentially very significant. There will be major holdings of Italian bonds in major financial institutions,” he said. In a note analysts at RBS Marketplace welcomed the news saying it would stop the collapse of the bond market in countries under stress and buy “a significant amount of time.” “This policy response is in our view necessary and welcome even if it does not address the underlying weaknesses of the system: high private and or public debt, a lack of fiscal integration, the absence of a euro area wide banking regulator with binding powers,” said RBS. Market turmoil Global economy Economics Stock markets Ratings agencies Financial sector Euro United States Middle East Euro European Union Economic policy Bank of England Dominic Rushe Heather Stewart Jill Treanor guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

On This Week with Christiane Amanpour, the impressive and intelligent Gov. Martin O’Malley goes up against the weaselly Sen. Jeff Sessions in a discussion of what can actually be done to help the economy. And of course, the biggest problem is that there is no real debt crisis. It’s a high-stakes game in which the Republicans were pushing their spending-cut agenda from one end, and a Democratic president and leadership on the other who thought they could work the situation to their own political advantage. And then there’s we the people, caught in the middle of this mess: AMANPOUR: And so a clear lack of faith in Washington’s political ability to make real economic progress. With me to discuss whether the parties can come together on anything, Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley, who chairs the Democratic Governors Association, and in Alabama, Senator Jeff Sessions, the top Republican on the Budget Committee. Gentlemen, thank you very much, indeed, for joining me. Let me first ask you, you heard from John Chambers now, still categoric that this downgrade should happen. Do you think it’s justified? And how do you think the parties — you and, for instance, Senator Sessions, in terms of parties — are going to get together to solve this? O’MALLEY: I don’t think it’s justified, in terms of when you look at the math here. They made a $2 trillion mistake. The other rating agencies did not downgrade the U.S. debt because they did not make that $2 trillion mistake. But one has to find understandable their pessimism about our inability to come together on the most important issue facing our country, which is, how do we create jobs? We need a balanced approach. And the extremism, the Tea Party obstructionism here in Washington, is keeping us from restoring that balanced approach that America has always used — of investing in the future, investing in job creation, and also being fiscally responsible at the same time. AMANPOUR: Senator Sessions, do you think that there can be now sort of a wake-up call, as some people have suggested, for both parties to really come together? I’ve heard people say, this is serious. We don’t want to see political parties sniping at each other right now. We want leaders to be as big as the crisis that they have to tackle. SESSIONS: Well, look, we do have a big, big crisis. I’ve been warning all year, every expert before the Budget Committee has told us we’re heading to fiscal crisis. We’re on an unsustainable path. We’re borrowing 40 cents of every dollar we spend. This year, the interest on our debt is $240 billion. It’s projected in 10 years to go to $940 billion in interest in one year. This is unsustainable. And sooner or later, if we don’t change, this kind of ratings are going to continue. But when you have a Democratic Senate that will not produce a budget — and 900 — 830 days without a budget, a president who submitted the most irresponsible budget in history, who’s continuing to talk about spending more, investing more, whose secretary of education was demanding a 13 percent increase in the Department of Education next fiscal year, beginning October 1st, you know we’re in denial. We’re not understanding the threat. The president is going to have to look the American people in the eye and tell them, “We are on an unsustainable course.” He’s got to do that. And if he asks us to reduce spending by 10 percent across the board, all these departments and agencies, Congress would rally to him, you know — you know, in a bipartisan way . Now, this would have been a good time for Amanpour to explain how the Senate Republicans blocked the Democratic budget. But for some reason, she didn’t think that was relevant. AMANPOUR: Senator… SESSIONS: But if he’s going to deny we have a crisis , he’s not going to have bipartisan support. AMANPOUR: Just quickly, while I still have you there, the S&P also talked about — you’re talking about cutting spending. They also talked about raising more revenue. They talked about the Bowles-Simpson, which puts that in. Do you think that, for instance, when the bipartisan committee gets stood up, that there will be a chance for both sides to give on some of their sacred cows? Would you, on — on tax loopholes, for instance, and tax reform? SESSIONS: Well, raising taxes is what balanced plan means. That’s plain to every American by now. The administration wants to raise taxes so they can permanently implant a larger level of spending. They’ve increased domestic discretionary spending 24 percent in two years. This is unthinkable. And this would have been a good time for Amanpour to point out that most of that is increased spending for food stamps and unemployment benefits because of the recession. But for some reason, she didn’t think it was necessary. I wonder why? AMANPOUR: All right. SESSIONS: And so we’ve got a problem that we’ve got to bring that spending down, not increase the burden on the private sector. O’MALLEY: In all of that, Christiane, I never once heard the distinguished senator say the word “jobs.” What we have right now are moms and dads in Maryland, moms and dads in Alabama who are looking for work and have been looking for work for a long, long time. Senator Sessions voted for the largest deficit increases under George Bush, and he, like others in his party, worship at – worships at the altar of the false god of tax cuts . We need to be about creating jobs. And there’s good people in the Republican Party that want our country’s economy to improve. And that’s what we need to allow space to emerge. AMANPOUR: So I asked Senator Sessions about tax loopholes… SESSIONS: Well, Governor, let me just say this. The highest debt President Bush ever had was $450 billion. This president is averaging $1,300 billion. O’MALLEY: And every single time – and, Senator, you voted to increase the debt limit… SESSIONS: And the debt already, according to expert testimony… O’MALLEY: … three or four times under George Bush. SESSIONS: … is pulling down growth and costing us jobs. O’MALLEY: Oh, good, you said “jobs,” Senator. SESSIONS: The debt is 100 percent of GDP, is hammering our economy, and that’s why we’re not having the growth. That’s why we’re having the unexpected decline in growth that we’ve seen the first half of this year. AMANPOUR: All right. You’ve both laid out the parameters that we’ve heard over and over again. I want to ask you, Senator Sessions, do you have faith that this debt committee will be able to come to the agreements and make the cuts and savings and also do what needs to be done to tackle the debt? SESSIONS: Christiane, I do believe that committee can function and be successful in the limited goal we’ve given them. What S&P is saying, it’s not enough. It’s only about $2 trillion, a little over, when we’re going to increase our debt in the next 10 years $13 trillion. So that’s why they’re concerned. Even the plan is insufficient, if – if successful. AMANPOUR: And, Governor O’Malley, do you have faith that the debt committee can actually tackle this? O’MALLEY: I do, because when you look at – when you ask the public if they believe a balanced approach is required, almost 50 percent of registered Republicans agree that a balanced approach is required. Millionaires and billionaires should be playing their fair share. We all need to pull together and create jobs and to make this new economy ours. And I believe that we can come together around that. Look, it’s not a Democratic or Republican idea. It’s a historic economic fact that a modern economy requires modern investments to create jobs. And that’s what we need to be about. AMANPOUR: Governor O’Malley, Senator Sessions, thank you very much, indeed, for joining us.

Continue reading …

On This Week with Christiane Amanpour, the impressive and intelligent Gov. Martin O’Malley goes up against the weaselly Sen. Jeff Sessions in a discussion of what can actually be done to help the economy. And of course, the biggest problem is that there is no real debt crisis. It’s a high-stakes game in which the Republicans were pushing their spending-cut agenda from one end, and a Democratic president and leadership on the other who thought they could work the situation to their own political advantage. And then there’s we the people, caught in the middle of this mess: AMANPOUR: And so a clear lack of faith in Washington’s political ability to make real economic progress. With me to discuss whether the parties can come together on anything, Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley, who chairs the Democratic Governors Association, and in Alabama, Senator Jeff Sessions, the top Republican on the Budget Committee. Gentlemen, thank you very much, indeed, for joining me. Let me first ask you, you heard from John Chambers now, still categoric that this downgrade should happen. Do you think it’s justified? And how do you think the parties — you and, for instance, Senator Sessions, in terms of parties — are going to get together to solve this? O’MALLEY: I don’t think it’s justified, in terms of when you look at the math here. They made a $2 trillion mistake. The other rating agencies did not downgrade the U.S. debt because they did not make that $2 trillion mistake. But one has to find understandable their pessimism about our inability to come together on the most important issue facing our country, which is, how do we create jobs? We need a balanced approach. And the extremism, the Tea Party obstructionism here in Washington, is keeping us from restoring that balanced approach that America has always used — of investing in the future, investing in job creation, and also being fiscally responsible at the same time. AMANPOUR: Senator Sessions, do you think that there can be now sort of a wake-up call, as some people have suggested, for both parties to really come together? I’ve heard people say, this is serious. We don’t want to see political parties sniping at each other right now. We want leaders to be as big as the crisis that they have to tackle. SESSIONS: Well, look, we do have a big, big crisis. I’ve been warning all year, every expert before the Budget Committee has told us we’re heading to fiscal crisis. We’re on an unsustainable path. We’re borrowing 40 cents of every dollar we spend. This year, the interest on our debt is $240 billion. It’s projected in 10 years to go to $940 billion in interest in one year. This is unsustainable. And sooner or later, if we don’t change, this kind of ratings are going to continue. But when you have a Democratic Senate that will not produce a budget — and 900 — 830 days without a budget, a president who submitted the most irresponsible budget in history, who’s continuing to talk about spending more, investing more, whose secretary of education was demanding a 13 percent increase in the Department of Education next fiscal year, beginning October 1st, you know we’re in denial. We’re not understanding the threat. The president is going to have to look the American people in the eye and tell them, “We are on an unsustainable course.” He’s got to do that. And if he asks us to reduce spending by 10 percent across the board, all these departments and agencies, Congress would rally to him, you know — you know, in a bipartisan way . Now, this would have been a good time for Amanpour to explain how the Senate Republicans blocked the Democratic budget. But for some reason, she didn’t think that was relevant. AMANPOUR: Senator… SESSIONS: But if he’s going to deny we have a crisis , he’s not going to have bipartisan support. AMANPOUR: Just quickly, while I still have you there, the S&P also talked about — you’re talking about cutting spending. They also talked about raising more revenue. They talked about the Bowles-Simpson, which puts that in. Do you think that, for instance, when the bipartisan committee gets stood up, that there will be a chance for both sides to give on some of their sacred cows? Would you, on — on tax loopholes, for instance, and tax reform? SESSIONS: Well, raising taxes is what balanced plan means. That’s plain to every American by now. The administration wants to raise taxes so they can permanently implant a larger level of spending. They’ve increased domestic discretionary spending 24 percent in two years. This is unthinkable. And this would have been a good time for Amanpour to point out that most of that is increased spending for food stamps and unemployment benefits because of the recession. But for some reason, she didn’t think it was necessary. I wonder why? AMANPOUR: All right. SESSIONS: And so we’ve got a problem that we’ve got to bring that spending down, not increase the burden on the private sector. O’MALLEY: In all of that, Christiane, I never once heard the distinguished senator say the word “jobs.” What we have right now are moms and dads in Maryland, moms and dads in Alabama who are looking for work and have been looking for work for a long, long time. Senator Sessions voted for the largest deficit increases under George Bush, and he, like others in his party, worship at – worships at the altar of the false god of tax cuts . We need to be about creating jobs. And there’s good people in the Republican Party that want our country’s economy to improve. And that’s what we need to allow space to emerge. AMANPOUR: So I asked Senator Sessions about tax loopholes… SESSIONS: Well, Governor, let me just say this. The highest debt President Bush ever had was $450 billion. This president is averaging $1,300 billion. O’MALLEY: And every single time – and, Senator, you voted to increase the debt limit… SESSIONS: And the debt already, according to expert testimony… O’MALLEY: … three or four times under George Bush. SESSIONS: … is pulling down growth and costing us jobs. O’MALLEY: Oh, good, you said “jobs,” Senator. SESSIONS: The debt is 100 percent of GDP, is hammering our economy, and that’s why we’re not having the growth. That’s why we’re having the unexpected decline in growth that we’ve seen the first half of this year. AMANPOUR: All right. You’ve both laid out the parameters that we’ve heard over and over again. I want to ask you, Senator Sessions, do you have faith that this debt committee will be able to come to the agreements and make the cuts and savings and also do what needs to be done to tackle the debt? SESSIONS: Christiane, I do believe that committee can function and be successful in the limited goal we’ve given them. What S&P is saying, it’s not enough. It’s only about $2 trillion, a little over, when we’re going to increase our debt in the next 10 years $13 trillion. So that’s why they’re concerned. Even the plan is insufficient, if – if successful. AMANPOUR: And, Governor O’Malley, do you have faith that the debt committee can actually tackle this? O’MALLEY: I do, because when you look at – when you ask the public if they believe a balanced approach is required, almost 50 percent of registered Republicans agree that a balanced approach is required. Millionaires and billionaires should be playing their fair share. We all need to pull together and create jobs and to make this new economy ours. And I believe that we can come together around that. Look, it’s not a Democratic or Republican idea. It’s a historic economic fact that a modern economy requires modern investments to create jobs. And that’s what we need to be about. AMANPOUR: Governor O’Malley, Senator Sessions, thank you very much, indeed, for joining us.

Continue reading …
Ohio shootings leave eight dead

A family argument in Copley, Ohio ended in the deaths of eight people in two places, including an 11-year-old child A family argument in Ohio ended in eight people being shot dead in two places, including an 11-year-old, and two more people were wounded, say authorities. Five people to were killed in one location, then two more were killed nearby before police killed the gunman, police chief Michael Mier told WKYC-TV. The shootings happened in a wooded, residential neighbourhood of older homes outside Akron, Copley Township officers said. The neighbourhood remained blocked off by police all afternoon. Jeff Kirby of nearby Norton said he was visiting his mother’s home not far from the shootings at mid-morning when he heard gunfire – about 15 shots with several pauses between them. Kirby, 53, said the last gunfire he heard occurred about the same time he heard sirens in the neighbourhood. Copley police sergeant Eric Goodwin said he did not know the conditions of the wounded but said he believed there were no more victims. “As far as I know, everyone’s accounted for,” he said. He gave no more details, including how the shooter and victims were related, their names or what led to the argument. “That’s still under investigation,” he said. Copley is a town of about 14,000 people outside Akron in northeast Ohio. Ohio United States Gun crime guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Ohio shootings leave eight dead

A family argument in Copley, Ohio ended in the deaths of eight people in two places, including an 11-year-old child A family argument in Ohio ended in eight people being shot dead in two places, including an 11-year-old, and two more people were wounded, say authorities. Five people to were killed in one location, then two more were killed nearby before police killed the gunman, police chief Michael Mier told WKYC-TV. The shootings happened in a wooded, residential neighbourhood of older homes outside Akron, Copley Township officers said. The neighbourhood remained blocked off by police all afternoon. Jeff Kirby of nearby Norton said he was visiting his mother’s home not far from the shootings at mid-morning when he heard gunfire – about 15 shots with several pauses between them. Kirby, 53, said the last gunfire he heard occurred about the same time he heard sirens in the neighbourhood. Copley police sergeant Eric Goodwin said he did not know the conditions of the wounded but said he believed there were no more victims. “As far as I know, everyone’s accounted for,” he said. He gave no more details, including how the shooter and victims were related, their names or what led to the argument. “That’s still under investigation,” he said. Copley is a town of about 14,000 people outside Akron in northeast Ohio. Ohio United States Gun crime guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Maddow Flat Out Lies About S&P’s Downgrade Explanation: ‘Not Because There’s Too Much Debt’

As NewsBusters previously reported , MSNBC's Rachel Maddow was rewarded for lying about Rush Limbaugh on her program Thursday by getting a guest appearance on Sunday's “Meet the Press.” The top brass at NBC should be pleased with their decision for Maddow proceeded to thoroughly misrepresent the reasons Standard and Poor's gave for downgrading America's debt Friday (video follows with transcript and commentary): RACHEL MADDOW, MSNBC: I mean, the, the downgrade message whatever you think of S&P, they mentioned the need for increased revenues and for revenues being on the table three separate times. They absolutely indicted the fashionable intransigence of the Republican Party right now in Washington. And there's a question about whether or not there will be a change in fashion, whether or not that will be a sort of wakeup call that the parties need to work together rather than the Republicans' fashion right now, which is that any deal is a bad deal. DAVID GREGORY, HOST: Alex. ALEX CASTELLANOS, REPUBLICAN STRATEGIST: Oh, where to begin? I don't think Republicans are saying any deal is a bad deal. But when you look at what these rating agencies are all saying, Standard & Poor's or not, is that we can't continue to maintain an unsustainable level of debt. And these Republicans in the Congress are saying how can you grow an economy when you have to service an unfathomably growing amount of debt? And so they put their foot down on that. And the problem is not Republican intransigents, I think the problem is balance, as the president likes to call for. We have balance. We have Republican intransigence and “We have to stop spending,” and Democrat intransigents that “We must continue to keep spending.” That's why we got nothing done. GREGORY: But we… MADDOW: That's not why S&P says they downgraded us, though. S&P says, “The downgrade was motivated by all the debate about raising of the debt ceiling. It involved a level of brinksmanship greater than what we had expected.” That's why they say they downgraded us. Not because there's too much debt, but rather that Washington is not working. Toward the end of the segment, Maddow reiterated this stupidity: MADDOW: Let's take them on their word about why they did this. They said they did this because of brinksmanship over the debt ceiling. They did not say they did this because there's too much government spending. GREGORY: All right. Let's, let… MADDOW: They said they did this because of Republicans holding the debt… CASTELLANOS: Because of the debt. MADDOW: No. The debt ceiling. Brinksmanship… CASTELLANOS: Yeah, but the debt ceiling is the ceiling… MADDOW: …is their word. Really? Well, why don't we look at the official statement S&P released Friday to discern the truth? Here is the complete overview (emphasis added throughout to demonstrate just how wrong Maddow was): Overview

Continue reading …
Ryan claims downgrade is ‘vindication’ of GOP

Click here to view this media Rep. Paul Ryan said Sunday that S&P’s downgrade of U.S. credit was a “vindication” Republican actions and his budget plan, which would end Medicare as it exists today. “I am not very surprised with the downgrade,” Ryan told Fox News’ Chris Wallace. “We more or less saw it coming because we are the wrong fiscal path. We’ll find out what spike in rates we are going to get. Obviously not only does it hurt the federal government and its ability to close deficits, but it hurts people. Car loans, home loans, all these things are going to go up. And so, it is because Washington has not gotten its fiscal house in order.” And to me, this is just more vindication of our actions. We passed a budget, which according to someone with S&P yesterday, would have prevented the downgrading from happening in the first place.” “Isn’t that like a doctor saying, ‘I did the operation perfectly but the patient died?’” Wallace wondered. “In its announcement, S&P condemned the political dysfunction here in Washington, the grid lock here in Washington… isn’t the failure to compromise part of the problem?” “Both political parties are responsible for the mess we have right,” Ryan admitted. “This is not a Democrat or Republican problem only. Both parties got us to where we are. I would argue, though, in the last couple of years, we’ve gone deeply in the wrong direction.” “Yes, we haven’t been able to get the kind of compromise because our partners on the other side of the ailes had been unwilling to reform the [entitlement] programs that the cause of the problem.” The Huffington Post’s Jason Linkins questioned Sunday what sort of vindication Ryan had been claiming. “Yes, it was those actions, debt ceiling hostage-taking that led to the downgrade. And the end result of the negotiations was massive budgetary austerity,” Linkins wrote .

Continue reading …