On Sunday's Meet the Press on NBC, host David Gregory allowed Massachusetts Senator John Kerry to blame Standard and Poor's downgrade of U.S. debt on the Tea Party without challenge . However, minutes later, in an interview with Arizona Senator John McCain, Gregory was quick to accuse Republicans of “politicizing” the issue by criticizing Democrats. After quoting a statement from House Speaker John Boehner on the downgrade – which cited the unwillingness of Democrats to curb massive government spending as a cause – Gregory fretted to McCain: “Do you not see this downgrade as something akin to war that should galvanize political leadership on both sides of the aisle, rather than politicizing it?” Earlier in the exchange, Gregory was happy further Kerry's assertion that it was a “Tea Party downgrade,” arguing: “There were Republicans and Democrats who said Tea Party members, a lot of them freshmen conservatives, were digging in and, actually, some used the word 'hostage,' holding the whole process hostage because they would not raise any taxes at all.” McCain condemned the depiction of Tea Party members of Congress as hostage-takers: “And by the way, talking about hostages, of lately the Democrats have been calling us terrorists. So we need to lower that level of rhetoric, obviously.” Responding to McCain's observation that President Obama had failed to lead in the debt ceiling debate, Gregory declared: “The President was dealing….John Boehner was dealing. They were coming up with a plan. They couldn't sell it. Was this really failed presidential leadership?” Here is a transcript of Gregory's August 7 exchange with McCain over the debt downgrade: 10:44AM ET DAVID GREGORY: Joining me now, Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona, ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee.
Continue reading …Months after its brief exposure to the Arab spring, Bahrain’s cat-and-mouse routine of protest and repression continues • Bahrain’s prospects for democracy look bleak Hassan Ali Salman is a stocky, fit-looking young man. But he flailed in vain as the police officers grabbed him, one forcing his T-shirt up over his head as three or four others laid in with their batons, dragging and pushing him to a line of waiting Land Cruisers and more helmeted cops. Behind him, on a breezeblock wall, crudely drawn nooses encircle the names Hamad and Khalifa – the king of Bahrain and his uncle the prime minister – alongside graffiti demanding their execution and the overthrow of the regime. The recent scene in Sitra, a short drive from central Manama, the capital, provided an ugly glimpse into the cat-and-mouse routine of protests and repression in this Gulf island state. Filmed secretly, posted on YouTube and distributed on Twitter, it exposes what Bahrain’s western-backed government prefers foreigners not to see. In the nearby cemetery lies the grave of Zainab al-Juma, a disabled woman who died in July after inhaling tear gas from a police grenade. The black flag that marks her “martyrdom” hangs limp in the hot, still air. Another local victim was Ahmed Farhan, shot in March, his brains spilling out of his shattered head live on camera as horrified screams sounded all around. Bahrain is far quieter now than during its brief exposure to the winds of the Arab spring in February and March, but unrest continues. Every night cries of “Allahu Akbar” (God is greatest) echo through the villages of a Shia underclass that has chafed under the Sunni Al Khalifa dynasty since independence from Britain in 1971. “We go up on to the roofs and shout and then try to march to the entrance of our village,” said Abu Ali, a thirtysomething accountant and former prisoner from Karzakan who supports al-Wifaq, the Islamist movement demanding democracy and equal rights for all. “The repression is getting worse.” Haydar, from nearby Diraz, described a savage beating, curses and threats of rape as he was forced to kiss the boots of the police officers who tormented him on 26 June. “They pulled my shirt over my head and every hundred metres they hit me in the face and kicked me,” he said. Captain Ahmed of Manama’s police special forces unit insists his job is simply to “protect citizens” and that he and his men are reluctant to make arrests or use force. “If we catch someone they are in trouble,” he said. “They can lose their job or be thrown out of their studies and that will be on their files for good. Of course we take action if they try to harm us.” The night the Guardian joined his four-vehicle patrol the radio network reported small crowds gathering but there were no beatings or shootings. Young men waiting in the shadows in Sanabis, part of a Shia “triangle of steadfastness”, ran off when the Land Cruisers roared up, blue lights flashing as the police officers scrambled out, helmet visors down, to demolish the makeshift roadblocks, their gas grenade launchers at the ready. “It’s not just kids,” a police lieutenant said. “They are organised quite professionally with co-ordinated actions in different places at the same time.” Still, this is basically a public order problem, not a war or – despite the brave rhetoric – a Palestinian-style intifada. Ahmed hopes Bahraini municipalities will respond to police requests to remove the wheels from rubbish bins to stop them being used to barricade roads. Central Manama is calm. Pearl Roundabout in the commercial heart of the city has been wiped off the map , its famous statue has been destroyed and the only clue to its status as Manama’s “Tahrir Square” are two or three armoured cars and a refuse cart emblazoned with the name of a radical Shia leader, Hassan Mushayma, a bogeyman for the regime and for Sunnis. Yet the underlying tensions remain. Pearl has been renamed Farouq junction, an epithet attached to the seventh-century Sunni Caliph Omar and bitter rival of Ali, the founder of Shia Islam. It’s one of the signifiers of dominance and prejudice that are part of the sectarian fabric of Bahraini life. Another is that state TV broadcasts only the Sunni call to prayer. Sheikh Ali Salman, al-Wifaq’s leader, prefers to talk of universal rights. “What Bahrainis want is the same as people elsewhere in the Arab world,” he said. “The government succeeded to some extent in portraying what happened here as a Shia-Sunni clash, though it was less successful in convincing anyone that there was Iranian involvement. It also tried to show that the opposition were terrorists. But there is one basic conflict – between those who support democracy and those who want to maintain the current dictatorship.” Al-Wifaq withdrew its 18 members from the 40-seat parliament in protest at the first killings of demonstrators in February, but remains committed to peaceful change. Enemies dismiss its moderate image and claim it is no different from Shia hardliners such as Mushayma, who called for a republic to replace the Al Khalifa dynasty, launched a campaign of civil disobedience and destroyed a dialogue between the opposition and the reformist Crown Prince Salman that might – just – have defused the crisis. The crackdown began in earnest on 15 March when most foreign journalists had been thrown out or diverted to Libya. “It was an anti-Shia pogrom,” said Hala, an activist who helped plan the Pearl Roundabout protests. “Arrests began at two or three in the morning. People were dragged out of bed by armed men in ski masks and their houses smashed up. The Mukhabarat [secret police] set up a Twitter account and named people as traitors so that when they tried to leave the country they were picked up.” Hundreds remain in prison. Dismissals of some 2,000 people who stayed away from work during the unrest began at the same time. The destruction of around 30 Shia mosques has sharpened the sense of sectarian polarisation. Under pressure from the US, trials have been moved from military to civilian courts and two al-Wifaq MPs and a lawyer were freed at the weekend amid signs that more detainees would be released. But doctors and nurses from the Salmaniya hospital still face charges of occupying the building, hiding weapons, refusing to treat Sunni patients and inciting protests. Sunnis talk of boycotting Shia shops and Shia night workers complain of being stopped by police on their way home. “Even among lawyers there are tensions,” said a Sunni who defends Shia clients. “I am very pessimistic,” sighed Jassim, a Shia taxi driver whose startling cockney accent is a souvenir of years of work at the RAF base on Muharraq. “Things are much worse then before.” Shia journalists are smeared as traitors and fear harassment or worse if they cover Sunni events. “It’s been a big setback for all of us in Bahrain,” concluded Munira Fakhro, a Sunni member of the secular opposition Wa’ad party, whose leader Ibrahim Sharif is also behind bars. “We will either come out safe despite our wounds or the situation will deteriorate further.” Another middle-class professional woman reflected gloomily: “We sank very low. If we go any further people will start to leave. We were tearing ourselves apart.” Two things seem certain: repression without reform will not solve Bahrain’s problems and its citizen journalists will keep the story alive. “They are doing our job for us,” said a local photographer who works for international news agencies. “They set up webcams in the villages where there are clashes. It’s hard to get in and if you do you risk being arrested or hit by a tear gas grenade or worse. If the police catch you they make you erase your pictures. It happened to me once. After all, they are the ones with the guns.” Some names in this report have been changed Bahrain Arab and Middle East unrest Middle East Ian Black guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Months after its brief exposure to the Arab spring, Bahrain’s cat-and-mouse routine of protest and repression continues • Bahrain’s prospects for democracy look bleak Hassan Ali Salman is a stocky, fit-looking young man. But he flailed in vain as the police officers grabbed him, one forcing his T-shirt up over his head as three or four others laid in with their batons, dragging and pushing him to a line of waiting Land Cruisers and more helmeted cops. Behind him, on a breezeblock wall, crudely drawn nooses encircle the names Hamad and Khalifa – the king of Bahrain and his uncle the prime minister – alongside graffiti demanding their execution and the overthrow of the regime. The recent scene in Sitra, a short drive from central Manama, the capital, provided an ugly glimpse into the cat-and-mouse routine of protests and repression in this Gulf island state. Filmed secretly, posted on YouTube and distributed on Twitter, it exposes what Bahrain’s western-backed government prefers foreigners not to see. In the nearby cemetery lies the grave of Zainab al-Juma, a disabled woman who died in July after inhaling tear gas from a police grenade. The black flag that marks her “martyrdom” hangs limp in the hot, still air. Another local victim was Ahmed Farhan, shot in March, his brains spilling out of his shattered head live on camera as horrified screams sounded all around. Bahrain is far quieter now than during its brief exposure to the winds of the Arab spring in February and March, but unrest continues. Every night cries of “Allahu Akbar” (God is greatest) echo through the villages of a Shia underclass that has chafed under the Sunni Al Khalifa dynasty since independence from Britain in 1971. “We go up on to the roofs and shout and then try to march to the entrance of our village,” said Abu Ali, a thirtysomething accountant and former prisoner from Karzakan who supports al-Wifaq, the Islamist movement demanding democracy and equal rights for all. “The repression is getting worse.” Haydar, from nearby Diraz, described a savage beating, curses and threats of rape as he was forced to kiss the boots of the police officers who tormented him on 26 June. “They pulled my shirt over my head and every hundred metres they hit me in the face and kicked me,” he said. Captain Ahmed of Manama’s police special forces unit insists his job is simply to “protect citizens” and that he and his men are reluctant to make arrests or use force. “If we catch someone they are in trouble,” he said. “They can lose their job or be thrown out of their studies and that will be on their files for good. Of course we take action if they try to harm us.” The night the Guardian joined his four-vehicle patrol the radio network reported small crowds gathering but there were no beatings or shootings. Young men waiting in the shadows in Sanabis, part of a Shia “triangle of steadfastness”, ran off when the Land Cruisers roared up, blue lights flashing as the police officers scrambled out, helmet visors down, to demolish the makeshift roadblocks, their gas grenade launchers at the ready. “It’s not just kids,” a police lieutenant said. “They are organised quite professionally with co-ordinated actions in different places at the same time.” Still, this is basically a public order problem, not a war or – despite the brave rhetoric – a Palestinian-style intifada. Ahmed hopes Bahraini municipalities will respond to police requests to remove the wheels from rubbish bins to stop them being used to barricade roads. Central Manama is calm. Pearl Roundabout in the commercial heart of the city has been wiped off the map , its famous statue has been destroyed and the only clue to its status as Manama’s “Tahrir Square” are two or three armoured cars and a refuse cart emblazoned with the name of a radical Shia leader, Hassan Mushayma, a bogeyman for the regime and for Sunnis. Yet the underlying tensions remain. Pearl has been renamed Farouq junction, an epithet attached to the seventh-century Sunni Caliph Omar and bitter rival of Ali, the founder of Shia Islam. It’s one of the signifiers of dominance and prejudice that are part of the sectarian fabric of Bahraini life. Another is that state TV broadcasts only the Sunni call to prayer. Sheikh Ali Salman, al-Wifaq’s leader, prefers to talk of universal rights. “What Bahrainis want is the same as people elsewhere in the Arab world,” he said. “The government succeeded to some extent in portraying what happened here as a Shia-Sunni clash, though it was less successful in convincing anyone that there was Iranian involvement. It also tried to show that the opposition were terrorists. But there is one basic conflict – between those who support democracy and those who want to maintain the current dictatorship.” Al-Wifaq withdrew its 18 members from the 40-seat parliament in protest at the first killings of demonstrators in February, but remains committed to peaceful change. Enemies dismiss its moderate image and claim it is no different from Shia hardliners such as Mushayma, who called for a republic to replace the Al Khalifa dynasty, launched a campaign of civil disobedience and destroyed a dialogue between the opposition and the reformist Crown Prince Salman that might – just – have defused the crisis. The crackdown began in earnest on 15 March when most foreign journalists had been thrown out or diverted to Libya. “It was an anti-Shia pogrom,” said Hala, an activist who helped plan the Pearl Roundabout protests. “Arrests began at two or three in the morning. People were dragged out of bed by armed men in ski masks and their houses smashed up. The Mukhabarat [secret police] set up a Twitter account and named people as traitors so that when they tried to leave the country they were picked up.” Hundreds remain in prison. Dismissals of some 2,000 people who stayed away from work during the unrest began at the same time. The destruction of around 30 Shia mosques has sharpened the sense of sectarian polarisation. Under pressure from the US, trials have been moved from military to civilian courts and two al-Wifaq MPs and a lawyer were freed at the weekend amid signs that more detainees would be released. But doctors and nurses from the Salmaniya hospital still face charges of occupying the building, hiding weapons, refusing to treat Sunni patients and inciting protests. Sunnis talk of boycotting Shia shops and Shia night workers complain of being stopped by police on their way home. “Even among lawyers there are tensions,” said a Sunni who defends Shia clients. “I am very pessimistic,” sighed Jassim, a Shia taxi driver whose startling cockney accent is a souvenir of years of work at the RAF base on Muharraq. “Things are much worse then before.” Shia journalists are smeared as traitors and fear harassment or worse if they cover Sunni events. “It’s been a big setback for all of us in Bahrain,” concluded Munira Fakhro, a Sunni member of the secular opposition Wa’ad party, whose leader Ibrahim Sharif is also behind bars. “We will either come out safe despite our wounds or the situation will deteriorate further.” Another middle-class professional woman reflected gloomily: “We sank very low. If we go any further people will start to leave. We were tearing ourselves apart.” Two things seem certain: repression without reform will not solve Bahrain’s problems and its citizen journalists will keep the story alive. “They are doing our job for us,” said a local photographer who works for international news agencies. “They set up webcams in the villages where there are clashes. It’s hard to get in and if you do you risk being arrested or hit by a tear gas grenade or worse. If the police catch you they make you erase your pictures. It happened to me once. After all, they are the ones with the guns.” Some names in this report have been changed Bahrain Arab and Middle East unrest Middle East Ian Black guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …From Mother Jones — VIDEO: Tea Partiers Cheer the Downgrade of America’s Credit Rating : Is the tea party happy that Standard and Poor’s, the credit rating agency, downgraded the United States’ credit rating for the first time ever? You’d think that was the case if you were in the crowd at a tea party rally in Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, on Sunday morning. The Tea Party Express rolled into that northeastern city as part of its tour to bolster the six GOP state senators facing recall elections on Tuesday. But the most shocking moment of the event wasn’t the vitriol spouted by tea party leaders, which has dominated news of the tour stops in recent days. Instead it was the cheers that erupted when one of the Tea Party Express’ speakers described the recent downgrade as the tea party’s fault. Here’s what happened: Midway through the Fond du Lac event, Florida talk show host Andrea Shea King took the stage. She told the audience that commentators were describing the downgrade of US debt to AA+ from AAA as the “tea party downgrade,” laying the blame squarely on Congress’ right-wing faction and its supporters. But rather than boo those who claim the tea party caused the downgrade, the 200 or so Wisconsinites in attendance cheered, sounding almost proud to blamed for the downgrade. As they noted, pretty astounding that these people seem pretty happy to be taking credit for the full faith and credit of the United States taking a knock. Makes me wonder if they even understood what the hell the speaker was talking about. Transcript via Mother Jones : SHEA KING: This week—I wrote it down—they are blaming the credit downgrade on the tea party movement. CROWD: Yeah! [Cheers, clapping] SHEA KING: They are calling it “the tea party downgrade.” They are objectivizing [sic] us. Let’s just all hope these astroturfers are wasting their time up there with these recall elections this week. God knows how much outside money is pouring into that state over the last few weeks.
Continue reading …From Mother Jones — VIDEO: Tea Partiers Cheer the Downgrade of America’s Credit Rating : Is the tea party happy that Standard and Poor’s, the credit rating agency, downgraded the United States’ credit rating for the first time ever? You’d think that was the case if you were in the crowd at a tea party rally in Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, on Sunday morning. The Tea Party Express rolled into that northeastern city as part of its tour to bolster the six GOP state senators facing recall elections on Tuesday. But the most shocking moment of the event wasn’t the vitriol spouted by tea party leaders, which has dominated news of the tour stops in recent days. Instead it was the cheers that erupted when one of the Tea Party Express’ speakers described the recent downgrade as the tea party’s fault. Here’s what happened: Midway through the Fond du Lac event, Florida talk show host Andrea Shea King took the stage. She told the audience that commentators were describing the downgrade of US debt to AA+ from AAA as the “tea party downgrade,” laying the blame squarely on Congress’ right-wing faction and its supporters. But rather than boo those who claim the tea party caused the downgrade, the 200 or so Wisconsinites in attendance cheered, sounding almost proud to blamed for the downgrade. As they noted, pretty astounding that these people seem pretty happy to be taking credit for the full faith and credit of the United States taking a knock. Makes me wonder if they even understood what the hell the speaker was talking about. Transcript via Mother Jones : SHEA KING: This week—I wrote it down—they are blaming the credit downgrade on the tea party movement. CROWD: Yeah! [Cheers, clapping] SHEA KING: They are calling it “the tea party downgrade.” They are objectivizing [sic] us. Let’s just all hope these astroturfers are wasting their time up there with these recall elections this week. God knows how much outside money is pouring into that state over the last few weeks.
Continue reading …From Mother Jones — VIDEO: Tea Partiers Cheer the Downgrade of America’s Credit Rating : Is the tea party happy that Standard and Poor’s, the credit rating agency, downgraded the United States’ credit rating for the first time ever? You’d think that was the case if you were in the crowd at a tea party rally in Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, on Sunday morning. The Tea Party Express rolled into that northeastern city as part of its tour to bolster the six GOP state senators facing recall elections on Tuesday. But the most shocking moment of the event wasn’t the vitriol spouted by tea party leaders, which has dominated news of the tour stops in recent days. Instead it was the cheers that erupted when one of the Tea Party Express’ speakers described the recent downgrade as the tea party’s fault. Here’s what happened: Midway through the Fond du Lac event, Florida talk show host Andrea Shea King took the stage. She told the audience that commentators were describing the downgrade of US debt to AA+ from AAA as the “tea party downgrade,” laying the blame squarely on Congress’ right-wing faction and its supporters. But rather than boo those who claim the tea party caused the downgrade, the 200 or so Wisconsinites in attendance cheered, sounding almost proud to blamed for the downgrade. As they noted, pretty astounding that these people seem pretty happy to be taking credit for the full faith and credit of the United States taking a knock. Makes me wonder if they even understood what the hell the speaker was talking about. Transcript via Mother Jones : SHEA KING: This week—I wrote it down—they are blaming the credit downgrade on the tea party movement. CROWD: Yeah! [Cheers, clapping] SHEA KING: They are calling it “the tea party downgrade.” They are objectivizing [sic] us. Let’s just all hope these astroturfers are wasting their time up there with these recall elections this week. God knows how much outside money is pouring into that state over the last few weeks.
Continue reading …MRC has just posted the latest edition of Notable Quotables , our bi-weekly compilation of the latest outrageous, sometimes humorous, quotes in the liberal media. This week, NQ is chock full of quotes from journalists slashing the Tea Party as the Republican Party’s “Hezbollah faction,” who have “strapped explosives to the Capitol” and “waged jihad on the American people.” Oh, and New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd disparaging the “Tea Party budget slashers” as “cannibals,” “zombies,” and “vampires, draining the country’s reputation, credit rating and compassion.” So much for civility. The full package is available at www.MRC.org ; here are some of the best quotes: Deriding the Tea Party: Terrorists “Strapped with Dynamite” “There’s a nihilist caucus which is, ‘Listen, we want to burn the place down.’ I mean, they’re not, they’ve strapped explosives to the Capitol and they think they are immune from it. The Tea Party caucus wants this crisis, and do we want to do this again six months from now?” — Bloomberg columnist Margaret Carlson on Inside Washington , July 29. “If sane Republicans do not stand up to this Hezbollah faction in their midst, the Tea Party will take the GOP on a suicide mission.” — New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman, July 27. “You know what they say: Never negotiate with terrorists. It only encourages them. These last few months, much of the country has watched in horror as the Tea Party Republicans have waged jihad on the American people….For now, the Tea Party Republicans can put aside their suicide vests. But rest assured: They’ll have them on again soon enough.” — New York Times columnist Joe Nocera, August 2. Tea Party Budget Slashers = “Cannibals,” “Vampires” and “Zombies” “Tea Party budget-slashers….were like cannibals, eating their own party and leaders alive. They were like vampires, draining the country’s reputation, credit rating and compassion. They were like zombies, relentlessly and mindlessly coming back again and again to assault their unnerved victims, Boehner and President Obama. They were like the metallic beasts in Alien flashing mouths of teeth inside other mouths of teeth, bursting out of Boehner’s stomach every time he came to a bouquet of microphones.” — New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd, August 3 column. Children Who Don’t “Understand” How Government Works “The question, I think, some people might be asking is, do you think that members of the Tea Party caucus know how to govern, or are they — do they understand that standing up for a cause is not the same as governing?” — Co-host Ann Curry to Tom Brokaw on NBC’s Today , August 1. “Some people say that the Republican Party has been held hostage by the Tea Party. One of our Facebook followers sent in an interesting analogy and said, ‘Why are Republicans allowing freshman congressmen to control this debate?’ and this person said, ‘It’s like letting the teenager in the family run the family budget.’ I mean, there’s some truth in that.” — Moderator Bob Schieffer to GOP Senate Leader Mitch McConnell on Face the Nation , July 31.
Continue reading …MRC has just posted the latest edition of Notable Quotables , our bi-weekly compilation of the latest outrageous, sometimes humorous, quotes in the liberal media. This week, NQ is chock full of quotes from journalists slashing the Tea Party as the Republican Party’s “Hezbollah faction,” who have “strapped explosives to the Capitol” and “waged jihad on the American people.” Oh, and New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd disparaging the “Tea Party budget slashers” as “cannibals,” “zombies,” and “vampires, draining the country’s reputation, credit rating and compassion.” So much for civility. The full package is available at www.MRC.org ; here are some of the best quotes: Deriding the Tea Party: Terrorists “Strapped with Dynamite” “There’s a nihilist caucus which is, ‘Listen, we want to burn the place down.’ I mean, they’re not, they’ve strapped explosives to the Capitol and they think they are immune from it. The Tea Party caucus wants this crisis, and do we want to do this again six months from now?” — Bloomberg columnist Margaret Carlson on Inside Washington , July 29. “If sane Republicans do not stand up to this Hezbollah faction in their midst, the Tea Party will take the GOP on a suicide mission.” — New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman, July 27. “You know what they say: Never negotiate with terrorists. It only encourages them. These last few months, much of the country has watched in horror as the Tea Party Republicans have waged jihad on the American people….For now, the Tea Party Republicans can put aside their suicide vests. But rest assured: They’ll have them on again soon enough.” — New York Times columnist Joe Nocera, August 2. Tea Party Budget Slashers = “Cannibals,” “Vampires” and “Zombies” “Tea Party budget-slashers….were like cannibals, eating their own party and leaders alive. They were like vampires, draining the country’s reputation, credit rating and compassion. They were like zombies, relentlessly and mindlessly coming back again and again to assault their unnerved victims, Boehner and President Obama. They were like the metallic beasts in Alien flashing mouths of teeth inside other mouths of teeth, bursting out of Boehner’s stomach every time he came to a bouquet of microphones.” — New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd, August 3 column. Children Who Don’t “Understand” How Government Works “The question, I think, some people might be asking is, do you think that members of the Tea Party caucus know how to govern, or are they — do they understand that standing up for a cause is not the same as governing?” — Co-host Ann Curry to Tom Brokaw on NBC’s Today , August 1. “Some people say that the Republican Party has been held hostage by the Tea Party. One of our Facebook followers sent in an interesting analogy and said, ‘Why are Republicans allowing freshman congressmen to control this debate?’ and this person said, ‘It’s like letting the teenager in the family run the family budget.’ I mean, there’s some truth in that.” — Moderator Bob Schieffer to GOP Senate Leader Mitch McConnell on Face the Nation , July 31.
Continue reading …Court ruling sets legal precedent in Israel and is possibly first of its kind in world An Israeli family has been given legal permission to extract and freeze eggs from the ovaries of their 17-year-old daughter, who died in a road accident. The ruling by the magistrates court in the town of Kfar Sava sets a legal precedent in Israel and, according to a lawyer with 10 years experience in similar cases, is possibly the first of its kind in the world. According to the Ha’aretz news organisation, the family of Chen Aida Ayash agreed for her organs to be donated following her death a week after she was hit by a car. She was declared brain dead on Wednesday. They also petitioned the court in Kfar Sava, where they live, for permission for her eggs to be harvested and frozen. Ha’aretz quoted a medical source as saying the family had requested that the eggs be fertilised with donated sperm, as embryos stand a better chance of surviving the freezing procedure than unfertilised eggs, but the court denied permission for fertilisation at this stage. Maayan Maor, a spokesperson for the Meir medical centre, Kfar Sava, confirmed that the procedure had taken place. “This is a unique case, since this is the first time an Israeli court has approved the extraction and freezing of ovarian eggs from a dead woman,” she told the Guardian. “We don’t know the reason why Chen’s parents wanted it done. We just received the court order and did the procedure.” The Ayash family has made no public comment. According to Irit Rosenblum, a lawyer who founded New Family, an Israeli organisation that promotes family rights, the key issue is consent. “We don’t know if [Ayash] was concerned about continuation,” she said adding that even though the girl was only 17, she may have expressed a desire to bear children. “If [the family] can prove the fact that she wanted children, I see no reason why not to allow this.” There have been many precedents of sperm being extracted after death to allow a dead man’s widow or partner to conceive his child. Courts have insisted that petitioners must be able to show the man wanted to become a father. In 2007, the Israeli parents of a deceased soldier won a legal battle to be allowed to use his sperm, which was extracted post mortem, to create a child with an identified surrogate mother. Earlier this year, another Israeli family embarked on a legal battle to be allowed to use their dead son’s sperm to produce a grandchild , although they had no surrogate standing by. Rosenblum argued that a condition of creating a child from Ayash’s eggs must be that “the resulting child be brought up by his or her biological father”. She said it was better for a child to know its “biological legacy” than to be created by anonymous donor sperm or eggs. Rosenblum cited a recent case in which a couple created embryos through IVF treatment, but the woman later discovered she had cancer. Two years after her death, the man wanted to fulfil his pledge to create a child, but Israeli law meant he had to use a surrogate mother in the US. “It was the first case in the world of a child being born long after the death of its biological mother,” Rosenblum said. Israel Middle East Harriet Sherwood guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Military investigating claims soldier from Scottish regiment in Afghanistan kept body parts of dead insurgents as trophies Claims that a British soldier cut off the fingers of Taliban insurgents as trophies during combat operations in Helmand in Afghanistan are being investigated by the military police. The soldier, from the Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders battalion of the Royal Regiment of Scotland, is alleged to have removed fingers from dead insurgents during his unit’s tour, which ended in April. Detectives from the special investigation branch of the royal military police are reported by the Sun to have interviewed the soldier, but the MoD has declined to comment in detail or to confirm whether any soldier has been suspended. A spokesman said: “This is a very serious allegation and it would be wrong for us to comment. An investigation is ongoing.” The Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders, who specialises in air assault, were on their second tour of duty in Afghanistan, helping train the Afghan police but also involved in combat and security operations around Helmand. Part of the 16th air assault brigade, a company from the battalion, was also attached to the 2nd Battalion, the Parachute Regiment, on combat duties. There is no information on which company the soldier came from. Clive Fairweather, a former SAS commander and former honorary colonel for the Argyll’s cadet force, said if the allegation turned out to be true, the soldier’s comrades would be “horrified” that any soldier collected body parts as souvenirs. “This is one of the taboos of the military. There’s not that many, but this is one of them,” he said. He said some units were required, or under pressure, to produce evidence when an enemy combatant or target has been killed. Normally that would be a photograph or potentially a DNA sample, using a swab. Soldiers did sometimes take trophies, such as enemy equipment. Taking body parts would cause horror. Douglas Young, executive chairman of the British Armed Forces Federation, told the BBC he was “shocked” about the investigation. “While the facts still need to be established, if there turns out to be anything in these claims, clearly the MoD are correct to treat the matter very seriously,” he said. “The alleged behaviour is totally out of kilter with the ethos of the armed forces.” The Argylls, based in Canterbury, Kent, lost one member on their previous tour: a Fiji-born private, Joseva Vatubua. The 24-year-old became the first Nato soldier fatality in Afghanistan in 2011 when he was killed in an explosion during combat operations on 1 January. Military Afghanistan Scotland Severin Carrell guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …