Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 498)

On Monday, when the stock market lost over 600 points after the S&P downgrade, which was obviously going to happen, Fox News went ballistic. Of course. But when the markets rallied the following day, Beckel wondered why that was ignored by the producers on the set of The Five . Wingnut Judge Napolitano had these words for Bob: Bob, it’s not good to attack the producers. He knows they won’t boot him unless he mutters a couple of George Carlin’s seven dirty words . Remember, he likes the flat tax . I’m sure Fox News will go ballistic again today as the market opens down .

Continue reading …

On Monday, when the stock market lost over 600 points after the S&P downgrade, which was obviously going to happen, Fox News went ballistic. Of course. But when the markets rallied the following day, Beckel wondered why that was ignored by the producers on the set of The Five . Wingnut Judge Napolitano had these words for Bob: Bob, it’s not good to attack the producers. He knows they won’t boot him unless he mutters a couple of George Carlin’s seven dirty words . Remember, he likes the flat tax . I’m sure Fox News will go ballistic again today as the market opens down .

Continue reading …
Alec Baldwin — Non-Liberal Man of the People? — Prepares for Politics

Wednesday's Times contained an interview with actor Alec Baldwin about his political ambitions, and naturally, reporter Sarah Maslin Nir — whose regular job is a night-life “Nocturnalist” blogger — as too star-struck to suggest Baldwin's one of those ultraliberal actor/political dilettantes who primps about running for Mayor. She never described him as a liberal at all. Baldwin was clearly happy with the profile, since he Twitter-smooched her after it was published: “Ah, there's nothing like a young reporter yearning for truth”. She tweeted back, “thanks! Nothing like a newsmaker being frank with the press. Much appreciated.” There wasn't much embarrassing about Baldwin to talk about. She mentioned the bitter divorce with Kim Basinger and Baldwin calling his daughter a “pig,” but that's old news. She mentioned that Baldwin supported Anthony Weiner for a while, since “sex scandals mean nothing to me,” but she didn't note that Baldwin puffed Weiner on The Huffington Post as a high-functioning “modern human being” as he sent crotch pictures on Twitter. The Times completely ignored all of Baldwin's wacky editorializing for the Huff-Post about Dick Cheney being a terrorist he'd like to kill. In 2006, he wrote “Cheney is a terrorist. he terrorizes our enemies abroad and innocent citizens here at home indiscriminately.” When he was attacked for these remarks, he apologized insincerely: “How about something more measured, then? How about…a lying, thieving Oil Whore. Or, a murderer of the U.S. Constitution?” Clearly, if he ever runs for office, Baldwin's campaign ads ought to be doozies. On the Fourth of July in 2006, he cooked up a double-murder fantasy. After dispatching Osama bin Laden with a box-cutter and hurling his corpse off a high balcony, “in the final stroke of luck,

Continue reading …

While we didn’t win everything we wanted in Wisconsin, we scored a significant victory. Of the Republicans the left tried to recall in the state, three of the seven were successful. That’s a pretty powerful message, since there were only four recall elections prior to that in the state’s history. There are a number of important things we learned last night, or at least, a number of things we should learn… 1. The grassroots can overcome Citizens United-inspired massive spending: Between $20-$40 million was spent by the right on this recall. The results of that were two losses and several narrow victories in strongly Republican districts. This is very encouraging. 2. Money still talks, although the influence is less than it used to be: Alberta Darling is still a state senator because $8 million was spent on her campaign. That’s the only reason. Similarly, Rick Scott is governor of Florida because he spent $72 million. Without these large sums of money, these candidates couldn’t have won. They have nothing else going for them. 3. Left-wing GOTV methods are inadequate: Looking at the narrow margins in these races (and many other races in recent years) it is obvious that better GOTV could have swung a lot races, particularly in the 2010 midterms. I think it’s time to completely, and scientifically, re-examine left-wing GOTV efforts. Learn what works and doesn’t work and abandon the traditional methods that don’t work. And there are probably a lot of them. Then we need a coordinated and well-funded effort to train everyone on the left nationwide how to do things the right way. 4. Republican districts, everywhere, are mostly just districts where people with good values just don’t show up to vote: Can anyone honestly say that there weren’t a few thousand more leftists in each of these losing districts last night that couldn’t have voted? There is a mountain of evidence that our issue positions are the majority positions across the nation. How do we get that majority to show up to the polls? In every election? If we figure that out, the right is doomed for generations. 5. Left-wing messaging is still inadequate: This is less about last night than it is about the left in general. Democrats did pretty well last night because there was a clear message — Scott Walker and his cronies are hurting the state and hurting you. That drove turnout pretty well and Democrats picked up traditionally Republican seats. The problem is that message won’t work twice. It never does. Shilling and King have to get rid of the crony part of the message now and focus on Walker. But what happens when they have no boogeyman/men to go after? What happens to Democratic incumbents? If they don’t have good messaging, they’ll be on the wrong side of the anger that is growing with the public. 6. The right-wing agenda is toxic when the public knows about it and understands it: Democrats didn’t do well last night because they outspent the other side. And there’s ample evidence that the other side was very active in the grassroots, too. So how did Democrats do so well? Because the Republican agenda sucks. And when people know that, anyone who isn’t a right-wing ideologue votes against that agenda. 7. Left-wing infrastructure is still inadequate: Last night showed that there has been major improvement in our infrastructure in recent years. Tons of groups helped out in Wisconsin and it made a difference. But what happens when that infrastructure has to focus on 50 states at the same time? The right has good infrastructure in almost every city. They are constantly training the next generation of activists and candidates and funding them to make sure they don’t leave the movement. We’re nowhere near anything like that. This might be our most pressing need, though. 8. Democrats still don’t know how to fight: Why would anyone concede a close election where there are potential shenanigans with the clerk counting the votes? Recounts are not about overturning close elections, they are about ensuring the integrity of the vote. Don’t give up until you know that you’ve lost. Don’t assume it because that’s the way it looks. Stand up and fight. Even if you lose this battle, people will remember you as a fighter and will support you next time. Quit worrying about what the media and Republicans are going to say about you — they’re going to say that anyway. Get over it. Assume it’s going to happen (it always does) and do the right thing. 9. Things are changing because the people want change: The process is slow and very painful. It could be going more quickly and many people who could be doing better should be doing better (yes, I’m talking to you Mr. President). But things are moving in the right direction. They are far from perfect and we are losing some battles in the short run. Wisconsin is a great example of this. Things moved in the right direction last night and now there is a legitimate chance (with a crossover Republican vote) of stopping the most extreme things Scott Walker wants to do. That’s progress. And it’s happening because more and more people are growing tired of the same old nonsense. Now, our job is to capitalize on that and to increase the pace of that change. 10. The media isn’t on our side, but that doesn’t really matter: Every election cycle, the mainstream media become less and less important in determining the outcome of elections. People already use the Internet for their information on candidates and use DVR and other technology to skip campaign commercials. And, really, who gets their voting advice from TV pundits? I’m sure some do, but that influence is decreasing. I’m sure there are other things we should be discussing about last night, but we certainly shouldn’t be upset about the results. We should be encouraged that we were able to take out three Republican districts in very short order and against a tide of money and right-wing activism. There is something going on in America and if we pay attention and approach it the right way, we can achieve the bigger change we want. It isn’t going to be easy and it isn’t going to be quick, but we can make it happen. Wisconsin showed us that.

Continue reading …
Maddow: If Republicans Retain Power in WI Senate, All Eyes Will Turn to Dale Schultz

Click here to view this media The final results of the Wisconsin recall elections came in after Rachel Maddow made this report. The AP declared the race in Wisconsin Senate District 8 for incumbent Alberta Darling. After taking the viewers through a wrap up of the other final results of the elections during some of MSNBC’s extended coverage Tuesday night, Maddow discussed what this is going to mean for the balance of power in the Wisconsin Senate and how all eyes might now be turning to state Sen. Dale Schultz in that regard since he has shown a willingness to work with some of his Democratic colleagues and push back against Gov. Scott Walkers radical anti-union agenda. Markos did a wrap up on the elections and shared some of his thoughts on why all of us should not be completely pessimistic about the outcome of these races. Wisconsin wrap up, a real victory, and we fight on : I’ve got to say, I expected to be torn up if we didn’t get to three seats. I expected to suffer through yet another bout of electoral depression, bummed at coming up short yet again . And we did come up short! Short of what? Short of taking the Wisconsin Senate? Sure. That would’ve been nice. But let me just say, if tonight was a loss, I hope we have many more such “losses” in 2012. We took the fight into red territory, and took two seats. What was a safe 19-14 GOP advantage is now a narrow 17-16. If we had those numbers going into 2011, the anti-labor bill would never have passed—one GOPer voted with the Democrats (and hey, Sen. Dale Schultz, the water is mighty fine on our side of the aisle!). The execrable Randy Hopper is gone. He can cry in his 20-something-year-old mistress’s arms tonight. And Kapanke too. It sucks being unemployed in Wisconsin these days. Maybe they can get a non-union job at McDonald’s. Beyond Wisconsin, if we can enjoy a similar “loss rate” in Republican-held districts (picking up 33 percent of them), Speaker Nancy Pelosi will have a huge majority in 2013. We had a message that resonated with large numbers of working people in overwhelmingly white working-class districts that shifted hard against Democrats in 2010. GOP overreach is winning them back for us. Just think, before today, only 13 state legislators had been recalled in the entire history of this nation . So yeah, I feel strangely energized and elated. And as he noted, this is going to be a long war fighting against all the Koch money and from similar groups like Karl Rove’s and others that was poured into these recall elections and we’re going to have to fight for every inch of territory. And as he noted, they’re going to try to cheat and steal or buy any election everywhere they can when they feel they can’t win an election fairly. Which brings things back to full circle where we should all be demanding that AG Eric Holder look into the activities out of Waukesha County county clerk Kathy Nickolaus’ office . If anyone would like to contact his office to inquire on that matter, the information to do so is here .

Continue reading …
WaPo Double Standard on Modesty: Fashionable for Muslims, Frumpy and Repressive for Christians

Five years ago Post fashion writer Robin Givhan scoffed at the notion of modest swimwear in a July 14, 2006 column “Ultimate Coverup.” Fast forward to today and the Post's Alison Lake gave Style section readers a gushy look at how “Muslim women shop for ways to bare little.” “Web sites offer modest fashions suitable for summer and pool wear,” noted the subheader to Lake's story. “U.S. Muslims number about 2.4 million (estimates vary), with about 250,000 in the Washington area, but no major fashion retail chain markets directly to Muslim women,” Lake lamented, adding “many struggle to shop locally” and must turn to Internet outlets. What's more, “in major retail stores, modesty is an afterthought,” Lake noted, citing Muslim fashion designer Zeena Altalib of PrimoModa.com. Lake cited another Muslim designer, Kelly Alsharif who argued that “If a chain store were to carry clothing that appealed to these groups [Muslims and conservative Christians and Jews concerned with modesty], they would have a very loyal customer base.” Overall, the tone of Lake's piece was clear: Muslims can be fashionable while being modest and faithful to religious tradition, but it's a shame that mainstream retail shops don't carry clothing that caters to them. By contrast, the 2006 column by then-Post fashion critic Robin Givhan derided the notion of women choosing modest swimwear, singling out the Wholesome Wear line : The makers of WholesomeWear swimsuits would like women to cover up their tummies. And their backs. And their arms. And half their legs. The Oregon company, based outside Portland, sells a collection of swimwear online that consists of a wet suit topped by a dress. The spandex underpinning is not sufficient on its own because bystanders would still be able to make out the curves of the woman's body. The nylon overdress takes care of any audacious display of an hourglass shape.Givhan added that “[t]he collection is not aimed at practitioners of any specific religion. There is no obvious mention of spirituality, God, Allah or Joseph Smith on the company's Web site,” but given that the swimwear sold doesn't cover down to the ankles and wrists nor covers the hair and neck, it's a safe bet that it may not be purchased by very conservative Muslims. Givhan noted that Wholesome Wear “is not aimed at practitioners of any religion” but went on to scoff the Christian sensibilities that inform the company's founders (emphasis mine): “There are still people in this world who prefer modesty,” says Joan Ferguson, who handles sales for the company. “So my son, his wife and daughter designed the product.” WholesomeWear is going into its fifth year and, according to Ferguson, has sold thousands of swimsuits in three styles: culotte, skirted and “slimming,” which looks like a loose-fitting housedress. There is an option with the slimming suit to extend the sleeves below the elbows and to lower the hem so it ends just above the ankles. A woman would be swimming in something akin to a choir robe. “These are designed to highlight the face and not the body,” Ferguson says. That may be true, but a woman is more than just a disembodied head. Why be fearful of the rest of her? The company may not be preaching to a specific denomination, but it is nonetheless preaching. Ferguson describes her family as “Christian people who love the Lord.” And the swimsuits are “a ministry.” It's understandable that some men and women may feel frustrated and scandalized in a culture that accommodates micro-miniskirts, cropped halter tops and visible thongs. They want someone to stand up and say, “Put some clothes on, darn it!” But surely, in the search for modesty, wouldn't one stumble across something decent and virtuous before getting all the way to a nylon shroud? Wouldn't a demure tankini do? Or a one-piece with a matching skirt? Ferguson says her company isn't on a mission to un-liberate women. “Absolutely not. If people want to buy our suits we're thrilled, but they certainly don't have to,” Ferguson says. A person has to have strong convictions “to wear our suits,” she says. If you have those convictions, “you're not going to care about the liberation or if you get persecuted and made fun of.” WholesomeWear may appeal to certain people of faith, but it also raises many lamentable body issues with which women grapple . Most women dread buying a swimsuit. The occasion is fraught with irrational feelings of inadequacy. Women often joke that they would wear a muumuu to the beach if they could. The truth is there's nothing to stop them from doing just that. But they know the cure for their insecurity is to let go of cultural expectations and their own skewed self-image. The answer is not to hide the body but to cheer for its ability to swim laps or just sedately float — in a bit of form-fitting, aerodynamic nylon and Lycra. That's not immodesty; that's confidence. In the past, the woman on the beach wearing a bikini was the aberration, the spectacle. But now, a woman in a bikini is commonplace. She spans all ages. And there is something especially compelling about an older woman wearing a two-piece swimsuit, not necessarily to display her curves but to underscore her strength. A woman swaddled in WholesomeWear's knee-length nylon would stand out. Not just because she's covered up but because she's done it in such an unattractive way. Perhaps she is modest or religious or simply someone who really needs to get over the fact she doesn't have legs like Naomi Campbell. But in looking at all that camouflaging fabric, at the layers aimed at obscuring the physique, one wonders how a swimsuit “ministry” can save anyone's soul when such ungainly suits have so little appreciation for beauty. Image of woman modeling “modern modest swim suit” via PrimoModa.com.

Continue reading …
Kentucky City Gives Bible Theme Park a 75% Tax Break

Click here to view this media Williamstown, Kentucky has agreed to give a staggering 75 percent property tax discount to a biblical theme park that will feature a full-size replica of Noah’s Ark. The tax breaks provided by the Grant County city of Williamstown would span 30 years, according to The Lexington Herald-Leader . That is in addition to the almost $200,000 already given to Ark Encounters LLC by the Grant County Industrial Development Authority. In May, the state agreed to give the project $43 million in tax incentives over a 10-year period. Gov. Steve Beshear (D) supports the project because a feasibility study produced by Ark Encounters predicted they could create up to 900 jobs and bring in 1.6 million tourists during the first year alone. But it turns out that Beshear never actually saw that study. “The press release was a joint effort, and the Ark Encounter provided the numbers for the release based on their own research, much like how we work with companies on jobs announcements — they give us the info about their job numbers and investment and we work together on a release,” Beshear spokeswoman Kerri Richardson told the Herald-Leader . Americans United for the Separation of Church and State has threatened to sue. “The state of Kentucky should not be promoting the spread of fundamentalist Christianity or any other religious viewpoint,” Americans United executive director Rev. Barry W. Lynn told the paper. The new ark theme park will be an offshoot of the Creation Museum in Petersburg, which is run by Answers in Genesis, a part owner of Ark Encounters LLC. The Creation Museum offers attractions based on a literal interpretation of the Bible, including that Earth was was created in six 24-hour days between 6,000 and 10,000 years ago. In addition to a life-sized replica of Noah’s Ark with dinosaurs, the 800-acre park will feature a Tower of Babel, a petting zoo and other Bible-themed attractions.

Continue reading …
England riots: pressure to scrap police cuts as Birmingham mourns its dead

• Tensions high in wake of killing of three men • Family say they were guarding car wash from looters • Father asks: why do we have to kill each other? David Cameron is facing growing cabinet pressure to rethink the coalition’s policing cuts in the wake of the deaths of three young Birmingham men, who were hit by a car during violent disturbances in the city. As the Police Federation warned of a “catastrophe” if similar riots erupted after the cuts were introduced, a senior government source said the Home Office would be advised to take a fresh look at its plans to cut £2bn from police funding over the next few years. “The optics have changed,” the source told the Guardian. Cameron insisted that the cuts would not lead to a “reduction in visible policing”. He is expected to announce some emergency funding when he addresses the Commons on Thursday, to cover the extra costs of policing this week’s riots, as well as the possibility of insurance claims against police on the grounds they provided no protection to businesses in a riot. But there are fears in Whitehall that the Home Office plan to make savings in the police service could leave an “exposed flank” in any future riots. The London mayor Boris Johnson warned that the case for cuts was “pretty frail” and had been weakened. Meanwhile tensions were high in Birmingham. A murder inquiry was launched and a 32-year-old man arrested after the three men, guarding a petrol station from looters in Winson Green, died from injuries sustained in the incident in the early hours of Wednesday. The Bishop of Aston, the Rt Rev Antony Watson, warned of possible reprisals and events “potentially having an ugly race dimension”, following a heated meeting between local residents at a mosque. West Midlands chief constable Chris Sims appealed for calm saying he hoped the incident would not lead to “violence between different communities”. The three men who died were named as Haroon Jahan, 21, a mechanic, and brothers Shazad Ali, 30, and Abdul Musavir, 31, who ran a local car wash. Ali’s wife is said to be four months pregnant. All were from the Asian Muslim community. Police said information was the car had been “deliberately driven.” The three were said to have been in a group of 80 young men protecting a petrol station and other premises in Dudley Road, after a nearby garage had been looted. One witness said four carloads of young African-Caribbeans had cruised down Dudley Road and suggested there had been no doubt what they were planning to loot. Jahan’s father, Tariq Jahan, made an emotional appeal for calm in the community as he described how he saw the incident, but did not know his son had been hit. Holding a photograph of his son at the door of his Winson Green home, he said: “My instinct was to help the three people, I did not know who they were but they had been injured. I was helping the first man and someone told me my son was behind me. “So I started CPR on my own son, my face was covered in blood, my hands were covered in blood. Why, why?” “He was trying to help his community and he has been killed. “He was a very well-liked kid. I can’t describe to anybody what it feels like to lose a son. He was the youngest of three, and anything I ever wanted done, I would always ask Haroon to sort it out for me. “A day from now, maybe two days from now, the whole world will forget and nobody will care”. In a message to the local community, he implored: “Today we stand here to plead with all the youth to remain calm, for our communities to stand united. “This is not a race issue. The family has received messages of sympathy and support from all parts of society.” Visibly emotional, Jahan added: “I lost my son. Blacks, Asians, whites – we all live in the same community. Why do we have to kill one another? Why are we doing this? Step forward if you want to lose your sons. Otherwise, calm down and go home – please.” But elsewhere anger among residents was palpable. “Of course it was deliberate. No way was it an accident,” said one eyewitness. “The driver went on to the pavement and rammed them. He knew what he was doing”. “If the police don’t sort this one out quickly, there will be race riots,” added the man, who declined to be named, but who has given a statement to police. The family friend said Shazad, who had a degree in business management from the University of Central England, was standing near the petrol station with his brother when they were hit. Appealing on behalf of the family for people not to take the law into their own hands, he said: “It’s really, really sad. The family just want justice to be done.” Mohammed Chowdhri, a family friend said: “I have known Haroon since he was a baby, we are all absolutely devastated. He was fed up with the rioters and the looters and he was determined that they would not destroy our community.” As shoes taken off by respectful mourners formed a growing heap at a local mosque, community leaders moved rapidly to spread Jahan’s message and add words of their own. “These were bright young guys we’ve lost,” said one man. “They knew the meaning of work and got themselves decent jobs. The brothers had a carwash which was another business which might have been targeted, and Haroon worked as a mechanic in a garage. “They were well-known round here. One of them only got married in March and his wife was expecting their first child in four months’ time.” The bishop said that extended families were part of a very strong network in the community – he had met Haroon’s uncle and older brother – which added to the strength of feelings. Sobia Nazia, a cousin to the brothers, said: “They were brothers to everybody. They used to look out for everyone. They were heroes. I heard people describing them on Facebook as brothers to one and all.” Another mourner embraced Sobia and the victims’ younger sister who was welcoming mourners into the house, and said in Urdu: “They died martyrs.” The sister was too upset to reply, but Sobia said firmly: “We don’t want anything more to happen – just the culprits brought to justice. We don’t want other families to suffer. It’s the youth. They have no knowledge, they have no jobs and they are bored.” Warnings of racial violence came ahead of parliament being recalled on Thursday and as Cameron announced contingency plans were in place to deploy water cannon at 24 hours notice if necessary as part of a police “fightback” to contain the rioting and looting that has swept England since Saturday. Home secretary Theresa May ordered chief constables to cancel “all police leave” to deal with the rioting crisis, saying “maximising the police presence on the street must be a priority”, in affected areas. An emergency reserve of riot police has been put on standby as senior police tackle the unprecedented challenges of disorder, which has spread from London, to cities including Birmingham, Manchester, Salford, Nottingham, Bristol and Liverpool. Courts were sitting throughout the night, as the first of those to be prosecuted in connection with looting and violent disorder appeared, including a primary school assistant, and an 11-year-old boy. Visiting Birmingham on Wednesday, Cameron described the deaths in the city as “a truly dreadful incident”, adding that the police were “working night and day to get to the bottom of what happened and bring the perpetrators to justice.” Earlier, as he left a meeting of the government’s emergency committee Cobra, he said every contingency was being looked at and “nothing is off the table” in providing police with the resources needed to tackle the disturbance. Police would get whatever resources they needed, and legal backing for whatever tactics they needed to employ. “We needed a fightback and a fightback is underway.” The riots had shown “pockets of society” were not just broken “but frankly sick”. He said he expected prison sentences for those convicted of violent disorder, and that detectives were going through CCTV. Looters would be tracked down “picture by picture” and he would not let “phoney concerns about human rights get in the way of the publication of these pictures”. In London, 805 people have now been arrested in connection with violence, disorder and looting – with 251 charged. In total across England there have been more than 1,100 arrested. Six forces are now receiving reinforcements as part of the national mutual aid operation set up to deal with the scale of the looting. London, Manchester, the West Midlands, Gloucestershire, Nottinghamshire and Avon and Somerset have all been sent officers. Sir Hugh Orde, the president of the Association of Chief Police Officers, said if other forces requested help they would be supported. Orde, who has been having regular discussions with the prime minister and the home secretary at Cobra, said: “Clearly these are challenging times. We are in an unprecedented situation but we are determined to do our best to ensure that forces have adequate mutual aid for anyone who requests it.” A mobile reserve of police support units to provide a rapid response for forces, and made up of public order officers across the country, will be kept in one or two geographic locations to be called upon when needed. Cameron and inner-city MPs have been briefed by police chiefs that well- established street gang leaders have been organising some of the worst violence. Yvette Cooper, the shadow home secretary, demanded to know why the government had not acted on a substantial report in 2008, which claimed “agencies had missed significant opportunities to work with young people involved or likely to get involved in gangs.” She said: “Community leaders have been warning for some time about a growing gang culture in parts of our cities, and this has clearly been one factor in these appalling events.” She was backed by Labour MPs, including Graham Stringer the MP for Manchester Blackley and Broughton who claimed known members of the criminal underworld, gang leaders were present directing small groups of five or six where to go”. He claimed as many as 48 gang leaders operated in Manchester, but the fight against them had been weakened as police resources had been switched to fighting Muslim extremists.” While West Midlands police forensic teams prioritised the Winson Green incident, the force said that 11 other people were suspected of involvement. The chief constable said: “Like everyone else in Birmingham, my concern now will be that that single incident doesn’t lead to a much wider and more general level of distrust, and even worse, violence, between different communities.” But it was clear, feelings were at fever pitch. Describing the mosque meeting, Watson said: “There was a feeling that policing was soft, that’s been quite a common theme, and that discipline at home is too soft. There was quite a lot of anger that was hard to control, some people were saying ‘we should retaliate’. Others saying ‘we shouldn’t’. The tricky thing is it’s perceived as a race issue, that it’s part of an ongoing issue between blacks and Asians.” UK riots Police Metropolitan police Crime Boris Johnson Tax and spending Birmingham London Manchester Patrick Wintour Martin Wainwright Riazat Butt Sandra Laville Caroline Davies guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
England riots: pressure to scrap police cuts as Birmingham mourns its dead

• Tensions high in wake of killing of three men • Family say they were guarding car wash from looters • Father asks: why do we have to kill each other? David Cameron is facing growing cabinet pressure to rethink the coalition’s policing cuts in the wake of the deaths of three young Birmingham men, who were hit by a car during violent disturbances in the city. As the Police Federation warned of a “catastrophe” if similar riots erupted after the cuts were introduced, a senior government source said the Home Office would be advised to take a fresh look at its plans to cut £2bn from police funding over the next few years. “The optics have changed,” the source told the Guardian. Cameron insisted that the cuts would not lead to a “reduction in visible policing”. He is expected to announce some emergency funding when he addresses the Commons on Thursday, to cover the extra costs of policing this week’s riots, as well as the possibility of insurance claims against police on the grounds they provided no protection to businesses in a riot. But there are fears in Whitehall that the Home Office plan to make savings in the police service could leave an “exposed flank” in any future riots. The London mayor Boris Johnson warned that the case for cuts was “pretty frail” and had been weakened. Meanwhile tensions were high in Birmingham. A murder inquiry was launched and a 32-year-old man arrested after the three men, guarding a petrol station from looters in Winson Green, died from injuries sustained in the incident in the early hours of Wednesday. The Bishop of Aston, the Rt Rev Antony Watson, warned of possible reprisals and events “potentially having an ugly race dimension”, following a heated meeting between local residents at a mosque. West Midlands chief constable Chris Sims appealed for calm saying he hoped the incident would not lead to “violence between different communities”. The three men who died were named as Haroon Jahan, 21, a mechanic, and brothers Shazad Ali, 30, and Abdul Musavir, 31, who ran a local car wash. Ali’s wife is said to be four months pregnant. All were from the Asian Muslim community. Police said information was the car had been “deliberately driven.” The three were said to have been in a group of 80 young men protecting a petrol station and other premises in Dudley Road, after a nearby garage had been looted. One witness said four carloads of young African-Caribbeans had cruised down Dudley Road and suggested there had been no doubt what they were planning to loot. Jahan’s father, Tariq Jahan, made an emotional appeal for calm in the community as he described how he saw the incident, but did not know his son had been hit. Holding a photograph of his son at the door of his Winson Green home, he said: “My instinct was to help the three people, I did not know who they were but they had been injured. I was helping the first man and someone told me my son was behind me. “So I started CPR on my own son, my face was covered in blood, my hands were covered in blood. Why, why?” “He was trying to help his community and he has been killed. “He was a very well-liked kid. I can’t describe to anybody what it feels like to lose a son. He was the youngest of three, and anything I ever wanted done, I would always ask Haroon to sort it out for me. “A day from now, maybe two days from now, the whole world will forget and nobody will care”. In a message to the local community, he implored: “Today we stand here to plead with all the youth to remain calm, for our communities to stand united. “This is not a race issue. The family has received messages of sympathy and support from all parts of society.” Visibly emotional, Jahan added: “I lost my son. Blacks, Asians, whites – we all live in the same community. Why do we have to kill one another? Why are we doing this? Step forward if you want to lose your sons. Otherwise, calm down and go home – please.” But elsewhere anger among residents was palpable. “Of course it was deliberate. No way was it an accident,” said one eyewitness. “The driver went on to the pavement and rammed them. He knew what he was doing”. “If the police don’t sort this one out quickly, there will be race riots,” added the man, who declined to be named, but who has given a statement to police. The family friend said Shazad, who had a degree in business management from the University of Central England, was standing near the petrol station with his brother when they were hit. Appealing on behalf of the family for people not to take the law into their own hands, he said: “It’s really, really sad. The family just want justice to be done.” Mohammed Chowdhri, a family friend said: “I have known Haroon since he was a baby, we are all absolutely devastated. He was fed up with the rioters and the looters and he was determined that they would not destroy our community.” As shoes taken off by respectful mourners formed a growing heap at a local mosque, community leaders moved rapidly to spread Jahan’s message and add words of their own. “These were bright young guys we’ve lost,” said one man. “They knew the meaning of work and got themselves decent jobs. The brothers had a carwash which was another business which might have been targeted, and Haroon worked as a mechanic in a garage. “They were well-known round here. One of them only got married in March and his wife was expecting their first child in four months’ time.” The bishop said that extended families were part of a very strong network in the community – he had met Haroon’s uncle and older brother – which added to the strength of feelings. Sobia Nazia, a cousin to the brothers, said: “They were brothers to everybody. They used to look out for everyone. They were heroes. I heard people describing them on Facebook as brothers to one and all.” Another mourner embraced Sobia and the victims’ younger sister who was welcoming mourners into the house, and said in Urdu: “They died martyrs.” The sister was too upset to reply, but Sobia said firmly: “We don’t want anything more to happen – just the culprits brought to justice. We don’t want other families to suffer. It’s the youth. They have no knowledge, they have no jobs and they are bored.” Warnings of racial violence came ahead of parliament being recalled on Thursday and as Cameron announced contingency plans were in place to deploy water cannon at 24 hours notice if necessary as part of a police “fightback” to contain the rioting and looting that has swept England since Saturday. Home secretary Theresa May ordered chief constables to cancel “all police leave” to deal with the rioting crisis, saying “maximising the police presence on the street must be a priority”, in affected areas. An emergency reserve of riot police has been put on standby as senior police tackle the unprecedented challenges of disorder, which has spread from London, to cities including Birmingham, Manchester, Salford, Nottingham, Bristol and Liverpool. Courts were sitting throughout the night, as the first of those to be prosecuted in connection with looting and violent disorder appeared, including a primary school assistant, and an 11-year-old boy. Visiting Birmingham on Wednesday, Cameron described the deaths in the city as “a truly dreadful incident”, adding that the police were “working night and day to get to the bottom of what happened and bring the perpetrators to justice.” Earlier, as he left a meeting of the government’s emergency committee Cobra, he said every contingency was being looked at and “nothing is off the table” in providing police with the resources needed to tackle the disturbance. Police would get whatever resources they needed, and legal backing for whatever tactics they needed to employ. “We needed a fightback and a fightback is underway.” The riots had shown “pockets of society” were not just broken “but frankly sick”. He said he expected prison sentences for those convicted of violent disorder, and that detectives were going through CCTV. Looters would be tracked down “picture by picture” and he would not let “phoney concerns about human rights get in the way of the publication of these pictures”. In London, 805 people have now been arrested in connection with violence, disorder and looting – with 251 charged. In total across England there have been more than 1,100 arrested. Six forces are now receiving reinforcements as part of the national mutual aid operation set up to deal with the scale of the looting. London, Manchester, the West Midlands, Gloucestershire, Nottinghamshire and Avon and Somerset have all been sent officers. Sir Hugh Orde, the president of the Association of Chief Police Officers, said if other forces requested help they would be supported. Orde, who has been having regular discussions with the prime minister and the home secretary at Cobra, said: “Clearly these are challenging times. We are in an unprecedented situation but we are determined to do our best to ensure that forces have adequate mutual aid for anyone who requests it.” A mobile reserve of police support units to provide a rapid response for forces, and made up of public order officers across the country, will be kept in one or two geographic locations to be called upon when needed. Cameron and inner-city MPs have been briefed by police chiefs that well- established street gang leaders have been organising some of the worst violence. Yvette Cooper, the shadow home secretary, demanded to know why the government had not acted on a substantial report in 2008, which claimed “agencies had missed significant opportunities to work with young people involved or likely to get involved in gangs.” She said: “Community leaders have been warning for some time about a growing gang culture in parts of our cities, and this has clearly been one factor in these appalling events.” She was backed by Labour MPs, including Graham Stringer the MP for Manchester Blackley and Broughton who claimed known members of the criminal underworld, gang leaders were present directing small groups of five or six where to go”. He claimed as many as 48 gang leaders operated in Manchester, but the fight against them had been weakened as police resources had been switched to fighting Muslim extremists.” While West Midlands police forensic teams prioritised the Winson Green incident, the force said that 11 other people were suspected of involvement. The chief constable said: “Like everyone else in Birmingham, my concern now will be that that single incident doesn’t lead to a much wider and more general level of distrust, and even worse, violence, between different communities.” But it was clear, feelings were at fever pitch. Describing the mosque meeting, Watson said: “There was a feeling that policing was soft, that’s been quite a common theme, and that discipline at home is too soft. There was quite a lot of anger that was hard to control, some people were saying ‘we should retaliate’. Others saying ‘we shouldn’t’. The tricky thing is it’s perceived as a race issue, that it’s part of an ongoing issue between blacks and Asians.” UK riots Police Metropolitan police Crime Boris Johnson Tax and spending Birmingham London Manchester Patrick Wintour Martin Wainwright Riazat Butt Sandra Laville Caroline Davies guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Congresman Calls for Investigation into White House Aid to Bin Laden Raid Film

Is the Obama Administration inappropriately disclosing classified data to movie producers in the hopes of getting a film about the killing of terrorist mastermind Osama bin Laden released before the 2012 election? That is the question that Congressman Peter King (R-NY) is asking after word got out that the White House is giving inside information about the military raid that killed bin Laden earlier this year to the creators of the Oscar-winning film “Hurt Locker.” “This alleged collaboration belies a desire of transparency in favor of a cinematographic view of history,” King wrote in a letter addressed to officials at the CIA and the Department of Defense which asked for full details on the government's involvement with the film. The Defense Department acknowledged the collaboration in an interview with the Wall Street Journal: Col. David Lapan, the Pentagon spokesman, said that the Defense Department was providing assistance to director Kathryn Bigelow and screenwriter Mark Boal, the team leading the bin Laden project for Sony Pictures. But Col. Lapan said that no classified information would be provided to the filmmakers. “It is the violation of the law to provide classified information” to people not cleared to receive it, Col. Lapan said. Getting an accurate view of history is not the motivation of the White House, according to liberal New York Times reporter Maureen Dowd who broke the news earlier this week, saying that it is part of an Obama campaign “proxy” strategy to make the president look tough: The White House is also counting on the Kathryn Bigelow and Mark Boal big-screen version of the killing of Bin Laden to counter Obama’s growing reputation as ineffectual. The Sony film by the Oscar-winning pair who made “The Hurt Locker” will no doubt reflect the president’s cool, gutsy decision against shaky odds. Just as Obamaland was hoping, the movie is scheduled to open on Oct. 12, 2012 — perfectly timed to give a home-stretch boost to a campaign that has grown tougher. The moviemakers are getting top-level access to the most classified mission in history from an administration that has tried to throw more people in jail for leaking classified information than the Bush administration. It was clear that the White House had outsourced the job of manning up the president’s image to Hollywood when Boal got welcomed to the upper echelons of the White House and the Pentagon and showed up recently — to the surprise of some military officers — at a C.I.A. ceremony celebrating the hero Seals. Now that the film has been confirmed officially by the Defense Department, it's worth recalling NBer Tom Blumer's previous post which made the point that the same White House that was reluctant to offend Muslims back when Osama was killed seems to have no problem now with a “cinematic end-zone dance in front of the entire world.” Full text of the King letter is below: The Honorable Gordon S. Heddell Inspector General Department of Defense 400 Army Navy Drive Arlington, VA 22202-4704 The Honorable David Buckley Inspector General Central Intelligence Agency Washington, DC 20505 Dear Inspectors General Heddell and Buckley: I write to express concern regarding ongoing leaks of classified information regarding sensitive military operations. As reported in a New York Times column on August 6, 2011, Administration officials may have provided filmmakers with details of the raid that successfully killed Usama bin Laden (UBL). According to that report, Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc. and movie director Kathryn Bigelow received “top-level access to the most classified mission in history” to produce a movie about the raid, due for release in October 2012. Reportedly, a Hollywood filmmaker also attended a CIA ceremony in honor of the team that carried out the raid. The Administration’s first duty in declassifying material is to provide full reporting to Congress and the American people, in an effort to build public trust through transparency of government. In contrast, this alleged collaboration belies a desire of transparency in favor of a cinematographic view of history. Special Operations Command’s Admiral Eric Olson stated that the May 1st raid “was successful because nobody talked about it before, and if we want to preserve this capability nobody better talk about it after,” and that his operators’ “15 minutes of fame lasted about 14 minutes too long. They want to get back in the shadows.” Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Admiral Michael Mullen stated that “It is time to stop talking,” as “We have gotten to a point where we are close to jeopardizing the precision capability that we have, and we can’t afford to do that. This fight isn’t over.” Former Defense Secretary Robert Gates stated that “Too many people in too many places are talking too much about this operation, and when so much detail is available it makes that both more difficult and riskier” for such missions in the future. Leaks of classified information regarding the bin Laden raid have already resulted, according to a June 15, 2011 article in the Washington Post, in the arrests of Pakistanis who were believed by local authorities to have assisted the CIA with the May 1st raid. Further participation by JSOC and the Agency in making a film about the raid is bound to increase such leaks, and undermine these organizations’ hard-won reputations as “quiet professionals” − reputations important for their continued operational success. And, the success of these organizations is vital to our continued homeland security. Therefore, I request an investigation and classified briefing regarding this matter from the Defense Department’s and CIA’s Inspectors General, including but not limited to the following: What consultations, if any, occurred between members of the Executive Office of the President, and Department of Defense and/or CIA officials, regarding the advisability of providing Hollywood executives with access to covert military operators and clandestine CIA officers to discuss the UBL raid? Will a copy of this film be submitted to the military and CIA for pre-publication review, to determine if special operations tactics, techniques and procedures, or Agency intelligence sources and methods, would be revealed by its release? How was the attendance of filmmakers at a meeting with special operators and Agency officers at CIA Headquarters balanced against those officers’ duties to maintain their covers? How will cover concerns be addressed going forward? What steps did the Administration take to ensure that no special operations tactics, techniques, and procedures were compromised during those meetings? To the extent possible to determine, how many human intelligence sources and how many Agency intelligence methods have been compromised due to leaks about the May 1st raid? What effects have these compromises had on the CIA’s collection capabilities? Will Agency participation in a film about the bin Laden raid add to or exacerbate the effects of these compromises? If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Matthew McCabe, Senior Counsel for the Committee on Homeland Security, at (202) 226-8417. Thank you for your time and consideration of this request. Sincerely, PETER T. KING Chairman

Continue reading …