Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 411)
Man pleads guilty to assassinating Iranian nuclear scientist

Iran accused Majid Jamali-Fashi in suspected show trial of ‘Israeli sponsored’ murder of Masoud Ali-Mohammad A man accused by Iran of carrying out an assassination “sponsored and designed by Israel” has pleaded guilty to the murder of an Iranian “nuclear scientist”. According to Iranian media, Majid Jamali-Fashi, 26, admitted killing Masoud Ali-Mohammadi , a particle physicist who Iran says was involved in the country’s nuclear programme, Jamali-Fashi confessed to having attached a remote-control bomb to a motorcycle parked on the street, which detonated and killed Ali-Mohammadi while he was leaving home for work in January 2010. But seasoned observers questioned whether it was a show trial intended to cover-up Iran’s embarrassment over its failure to protect its nuclear scientists. The extent of Ali-Mohammadi’s involvement in Iran’s nuclear programme is still not clear. At the time of the assassination, some expressed skepticism over claims that he was a nuclear scientist, saying that he had voiced strong support for the opposition leader Mir Hossein Mousavi in the past. But it emerged later that Ali-Mohammadi could have been associated with Tehran’s nuclear ambitions after his name was seen on a list of an Iranian team at the Sesame Council, a joint-project involving different countries including Israel which runs a particle accelerator in Jordan. Prosecutors in the case accused Israel and its intelligence agency, Mossad, of being behind “terrorist groups” trained to kill Iranian scientists in order to halt the country’sIran’s nuclear programme. “The defendant had travelled to Israel to receive training from Mossad and had agreed to assassinate Dr Ali-Mohammadi in return for $120,000,” the English-language newspaper Tehran Times quoted the city’s chief prosecutor, Abbas Jafari Dolatabadi, as saying. According to the semi-official Fars news agency, Jamali-Fashi said he was also assigned to carry out five other “terrorist operations” after the assassination. Ali-Mohammadi’s family asked for death penalty for the accused, according to Fars, but Judge Abol-Ghassem Salavati said sentencing would be issued in due course. Jamali-Fashi had previously appeared in a TV programme in January in which he confessed to having been hired by Israel and trained at a military base outside Tel Aviv before being dispatched to Iran to kill Ali-Mohammadi. The programme described him as “the main element” of any Israeli-trained network involved in the assassination. At the time of the broadcast, Iran’s intelligence minister, Heydar Moslehi, said Iran had uncovered “a US-backed Israeli operation” and arrested more than 10 people with links to Mossad. In response to Jamali-Fashi’s TV confessions, Israel denied any connection with him. In recent years, Iran’s nuclear programme has experienced a series of setback after the assassinations of its scientists and the Stuxnet computer worm, which was designed to sabotage its atomic facilities and halt its uranium-enrichment programme. The malware is believed to have targeted a control system used in Iran’s nuclear sites in July last year. In November, Majid Shahriari, a nuclear scientist, was killed and Fereidoon Abbasi Davani, Iran’s current atomic chief, survived assassination in two similar attacks to the one which Ali-Mohammadi died. In July, an Iranian academic, Darioush Rezaeinejad was shot dead by gunmen riding on motorcycles . He was initially described by state media as a nuclear scientist but officials later denied he was involved in Iran’s atomic programme. Rumours spread that at the time that the 35-year-old masters student might have been mistakenly killed instead of a nuclear scientist with a similar name, Darioush Rezaei. Iran Middle East Nuclear weapons Nuclear power Energy Israel United States The Mossad Saeed Kamali Dehghan guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Earthquake measuring 5.9 strikes US east coast

No immediate reports of injuries as epicentre traced to Virginia and tremors felt in New York and Martha’s Vineyard A 5.9-magnitude earthquake centred in Virginia has shaken much of Washington DC and was felt as far north as New York City and Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts, where the US president, Barack Obama, is on holiday. The US Geological Survey said the earthquake was half a mile (800 metres) deep. Tremors were felt at the White House and all over the east coast as far south as Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Parts of the Pentagon, White House and Capitol were evacuated. There were no immediate reports of injuries. The quake was centred north-west of Richmond, the capital of Virginia, and south of Washington. Obama and many of the nation’s leaders were out of Washington and on holiday when the quake struck at 1.51pm EDT (5.51 GMT). The shaking was felt on the Martha’s Vineyard golf course as Obama was starting a round. The east coast gets earthquakes, but they are usually smaller and the area is less prepared than California or Alaska. At Reagan National airport, outside Washington, ceiling tiles fell during a few seconds of shaking. All flights were put on hold. At the Pentagon, in northern Virginia, a low rumbling built and built to the point that the building was shaking. People ran into the corridors of the government’s biggest building and, as the shaking continued, shouted: “Evacuate! Evacuate!” In New York, the 26-storey federal courthouse in Lower Manhattan began swaying and hundreds of people were seen leaving the building.The social media site Twitter filled with reports of the earthquake from people using the site up and down the US east coast. “People pouring out of buildings and onto the sidewalks in downtown DC …” tweeted the Republican strategist Kevin Madden. “Did you feel earthquake in ny? It started in richmond va!” tweeted Arianna Huffington, the editor-in-chief of the Huffington Post. Virginia United States Barack Obama guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Former Editor Says Murdoch Personally Gave Order to Have Someone Followed

Click here to view this media News Corp. CEO Rupert Murdoch personally told one of his former tabloid editors to have someone followed, according to a documentary that aired Monday night on Australian TV. Ita Buttrose, former editor-in-chief of Sydney’s The Daily Telegraph , told ABC’s Australian Story that Murdoch instructed her to have a subject tailed because legitimate reporting techniques were not producing the desired results. “I assigned a reporter to do it but [Murdoch] wasn’t happy with the result and said, ‘No, that wasn’t good enough. Have you followed this person?’” she recalled. “I can’t give this instruction,” Buttrose later told then-News Limited chief executive Ken Cowley. “I’m not having anybody that works for me, for whom I’m responsible, follow anybody. I don’t want to be a part of it.” Murdoch’s Australian-based News Limited vehemently denied the accusation. “Mr. Murdoch has never asked any journalist to do anything improper,” a spokesman said. “Mr. Cowley has never been asked by Mr. Murdoch to have a reporter conduct surveillance of any kind on any individual and nor would he have agreed to it had he been asked by Mr Murdoch or anyone else,” he added. Buttrose said that in the end, the matter was “dropped.” “If you run a newspaper there’s a responsibility that goes with it, and sometimes you have to be able to say to the boss, no, I don’t think we should go down this path.”

Continue reading …

Editor's Note: What follows is a statement Mr. Bozell released earlier today regarding the FCC's decision yesterday to remove the so-called Fairness Doctrine from the regulation books. The FCC deserves a one-handed round of applause for this move. Years ago, striking the Censorship Doctrine – and that's exactly what the Fairness Doctrine was – would have actually meant something. But since the FCC started playing with policies of ‘localism,’ ‘media diversity’ and a nebulous requirement to ‘serve the public interest,’ with yet another unelected and unconfirmed “Diversity Czar” to implement these proposed regulations, the spirit of the Censorship Doctrine has remained very much alive. The path to censor radio airwaves is being paved through the back door. The threat of government control of media will not be dead until these concepts of localism and diversity representation in the media are dead. The fate of political free speech on radio airwaves lies in the balance, and shame on the FCC for not putting an end to ALL threats to free speech.

Continue reading …

An earthquake with a preliminary magnitude of 5.9 struck near Washington, D.C., the U.S.Geological Survey said. The epicenter was in Mineral, Virginia . Did you feel it? Send CNN an iReport . CNN’s political producer Peter Hamby was vacationing with his family near Mineral and said he felt the shaking for 45 seconds. “It’s one of the largest that we’ve had there,” said U.S. Geological Survey seismologist Lucy Jones.Aftershocks were a concern, she said. “People should be expecting (them), especially over the next hour or two,” she added.The quake was felt in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; New York City and on Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts, where President Barack Obama is vacationing. Cell phone service has been disrupted in New York City part of which has been evacuated. Traders in the New York Stock Exchange felt the shaking and shouted to each other, “Keep trading!” CNN’s business correspondent Alison Kosik reported from the floor at 2:20 p.m. E.T. Just for perspective on the magnitude, the second-largest quake recorded in that area was last year, and was a magnitude 3.6, centered near Rockville, MD. Damage appears to be light at this time, but Fox has reported concerns about the Washington Monument tilting. More as it’s available.

Continue reading …
Rebels Breach Walls of Gaddafi Compound

Click here to view this media Some more telling images from inside Bab al-Aziziyah as the end nears for the despotic rule of Muammar Gaddafi. The statue seen in front of Gaddafi’s home is the Fist Crushing a U.S. Fighter Plane monument, in memorial to the 1986 bombing of Libya. CBS News’ Barry Pedersen and Sky News’ intrepid Alex Crawford report. Months ago Gaddafi spoke from the very same spot, calling the protesters pill-popping, drug-crazed youth. Famous parodies sprung up almost immediately.

Continue reading …

Click here to view this media Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum lashed out at Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) Monday, calling her “vile.” At a jobs summit at Inglewood High School Sunday, the congresswoman had said she wasn’t going to back down from her push for job-creation policies. “This is a tough game,” she explained. “You can’t be intimidated. You can’t be frightened. And as far as I’m concerned — the tea party can go straight to hell.” “She’s a caricature of what’s wrong with Congress,” Santorum told conservative radio host Steve Malzberg. “She’s vile. She’s always been that way, and she’s just one of these real, real nasty, you know, anti-basic traditional, fundamental values of this country.” “This is the left in America. They absolutely despise, you know, the founding principles of this country, that believes in free people, that believes in limited government. She is someone who believes she should control what’s going on in America, that she knows best, and that people that stand by constitutional principles of limited government are folks who are to be condemned.”

Continue reading …

In two separate interviews of Republican presidential candidates, CNN's Piers Morgan exhibited an obvious contempt of Tea Party politics as well as a double standard toward moderate and conservative presidential candidates. In Monday's interview with Republican presidential candidate Jon Huntsman, CNN's Piers Morgan baited the moderate candidate to criticize the Tea Party for its unwavering defense of its principles. In contrast, Morgan used the same rhetoric the week before to put Tea Party champion Ron Paul on the defensive. [Video coming shortly.] Huntsman criticized the Tea Party on Monday for its refusal to compromise in the debt ceiling debate. Morgan set him up with plenty of ammunition. For instance he asked if Huntsman felt sympathy for his “friend” President Obama having to deal with the “intransigent” Tea Party faction of the GOP. “But if you're the Republican nominee, how are you going to control these Tea Party side of the GOP, because they are so intransigent,” Morgan later asked Huntsman. However, one week earlier Morgan pressed conservative presidential candidate Ron Paul over the same issues – only Paul had to defend himself from Morgan's criticism, rather than being able to criticize his political opponents. “Many people don't like your total intransigence over any tax increase,” Morgan confronted Paul, adding that “People don't like your intransigence over abortion.” The CNN host then challenged Paul, asking “are you prepared on some of these more extreme lines you have taken to soften, to moderate, to, in short, make yourself more electable?” In both interviews, Morgan pressed the candidates on social issues. While he questioned Ron Paul if he would “moderate” his opposition to abortion in cases of rape or incest, he asked Huntsman, who is okay with abortion in such cases, if he thought a stance like Paul's is “bordering on bigotry.” “When you see, again, intransigence by some of the – particularly the Tea Party end of the Republican party on this kind of thing, do you think again that it's bordering on bigotry?” he asked of Huntsman. A transcript of the segments is as follows: CNN PIERS MORGAN 8/15/2011 9:07 p.m. EDT PIERS MORGAN: (to Rep. Ron Paul (R-Tex.) Let me put this to you, Ron, because you're a charismatic guy. You did very well in this straw poll. It doesn't mean an awful lot. But it's an indicator that you have a popular vote there. You nearly won it. What I hear about you is very experienced, charismatic, people like you. But the thing that holds you back is when you stray into extremity. You know, they don't like the fact you're so completely opposed to any foreign aid. They don't like the fact you want to legalize heroin. Many people don't like your total intransigence over any tax increase, especially when you have someone like Warren Buffett saying, come on, hit the super rich harder. People don't like your intransigence over abortion, for example, where you don't believe even if someone is raped that they should be allowed an abortion. Are you prepared at this moment when everyone is wondering which way the Republicans are going to go – are you prepared on some of these more extreme lines you have taken to soften, to moderate, to, in short, make yourself more electable? CNN PIERS MORGAN 8/22/2011 9:40 p.m. EDT PIERS MORGAN: The problem though, as we saw over the battle over the debt ceiling, a very spurious battle many would argue, is that if the Tea Party got into actual government, there is a sense that they would just never compromise with anybody. And normal process of government, given you all have to compromise, becomes paralyzed – as we saw over the debt ceiling route. And the victim in all that is America and its economy, as we saw. JON HUNTSMAN, Republican presidential candidate: You've got to run the country at the end of the day. You've got to get out from our respective corners politically. And you've got to make a deal. You've got to make the country function. I was the only candidate who stood up on the debt ceiling debate and said this country shouldn't default. We should cut a deal that allows us not to – we're 25 percent of the world's GDP. MORGAN: So when you heard all the Tea Party candidates, to a man and woman, saying no compromise, presumably you think that is completely unacceptable. HUNTSMAN: I thought it was the height of irresponsibility. The height of irresponsibility. We're 25 percent of the world's GDP, the United States of America, that has never defaulted before, just let it go over a cliff. You can imagine what the marketplace would have done in response. The marketplace is trashing everybody right now. I mean, assets are under water, 401(k)s, retirement. You can only imagine what this country would look like today if we had defaulted. It was complete lunacy for people to even talk about that. MORGAN: Do you have sympathy for Barack Obama, who's been a friend of yours personally? Do you have sympathy for him in the position he found himself in, where you have such an intransigent part of the Republican Party really just refusing to compromise? HUNTSMAN: He appointed me and I stood up and took the appointment to serve my country. I love this country. You serve her. But in terms of any personal relationship, there's not a personal relationship. You know, you work for – you work for your President when you're asked to serve.

Continue reading …
Anna Hazare’s anti-corruption protest sees Delhi signal compromise

Indian PM calls summit, although hunger striker accused of ignoring more urgent issues and backing xenophobic politicians Moves to resolve the political crisis in India triggered by a 74-year-old anti-corruption campaigner’s hunger strike have gathered pace. After a weekend of mass street protests, the government has appointed a representative to hammer out a deal to the week-long standoff, reports said. Anna Hazare, who has fasted for a week, wants the government to create an anti-corruption ombudsman with sweeping powers. His hunger strike has focused widespread anger over corruption – which is endemic in India – as well as broader grievances amid the growing middle classes. “It is not just about corruption, not just about one issue. People are very emotional about this,” Bhaskara Rao, a political analyst in Delhi, said. “However … there may be a deal relatively soon.” Following protests earlier this year, India’s prime minister, Manmohan Singh, proposed a small package of reforms.

Continue reading …
Cameron’s blind spot over Andy Coulson shows he has no eye for detail | Chris Bryant

Whatever the outcome of the Coulson saga, Cameron’s serial gullibility raises the question, is he fit to lead Britain? So now we hear that Andy Coulson was paid hundreds of thousands of pounds by News International for several months when he was working for David Cameron’s Conservative party. This despite the fact that he let the Commons culture committee believe that he’d had no secondary income. It seems everyone in the Tory party is now running for cover. Nobody knew of anything untoward. Everyone is categorical in their denial. But what they surely cannot deny is that they never really did due diligence. This was a man who had resigned from the News of the World under a cloud. One of his employees had gone to prison for hacking phones, along with a commissioned freelancer. Did anybody ask whether Coulson was still being paid by News International when he arrived at Conservative Central Office? If not, that would be culpable negligence on the side of the accounting officers at the Conservative party in my book. After all, it is claimed that a senior member of staff at the Tory party in effect received a hefty subsidy of hundreds of thousands of pounds. If so, Coulson could be considered during his time to have been on a News International secondment, which should have been declared to the Electoral Commission as a donation to the Conservative party. And if that’s the case, for all its denials, the whole party would be as liable for the compromising position in which Coulson put himself as News International is for the conduct of its staff. Ignorance is simply no defence if you haven’t even been curious enough to ask the blindingly obvious questions. Some have said this also poses questions about Cameron’s own judgment. I think that misses the point. The real problem is not Cameron’s judgment but his personality. What the Coulson story shows is a Tory leader far too childishly eager to please his soignée News International neighbours to bother with details; a man too naive to suspect that a friend of his couldn’t possibly have committed a crime that really mattered. In short, a man too easily fooled, guilty of serial culpable gullibility. Cameron is fast becoming the blind-eye prime minister. We already know he gets irritated by detail, but when it comes to appointing ministers or dealing with international leaders like Vladimir Putin, whom he is meant to be visiting in a few weeks, the last thing Britain needs is a gullible leader. There are other specific questions that need to be answered. How much was Coulson paid? Were there any further payments when he went to work at Downing Street? Did he ever provide information the News of the World had garnered illegally to help the Conservative party? Coulson told the Commons culture committee when asked about his pay-off from the News of the World that it was a private matter that he was happy to explain privately to the chairman, Tory MP John Whittingdale. Did that conversation ever take place? If not, why not? If so, what did Coulson tell Whittingdale and why has it not been made public? Which brings me to another point. Parliament is going to have to tackle the specific matter of whether action should be taken against those who may have lied to it. Thanks to the way parliamentary privilege works, neither the courts nor the Leveson inquiry can question proceedings in parliament. But if the Commons is to do its job bringing the powers of the land to book, it has to be confident in its own ability to gather evidence and take action where necessary. In the US evidence is taken on oath and lying to a senate or house committee can constitute perjury. Surely it is time parliament brought in similar rules? Someone suggested the other day that there will have to be a film about the phone-hacking scandal. I fear we are still only in act three of a five-act play. It’s far too early yet even to draw up the full dramatis personae. One thing I am sure of, though, is that Cameron’s Conservative party deliberately set out to woo Rupert Murdoch and failed to blanch when problems arose. The former was a mistake that others have made, the latter may yet prove to be something far worse. David Cameron Andy Coulson Phone hacking News of the World Rupert Murdoch News International Conservatives Newspapers & magazines National newspapers Newspapers Chris Bryant guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …