Is East Timor ready for a future without the foreign influence of the UN and other international forces?
Continue reading …enlarge From Henry Ford’s time until recently, there always has been a segment of the business community who was willing to grudgingly put up with the labor movement, Social Security, and other New Deal/Great Society programs because they knew they needed a broad, prosperous American middle class to buy their goods. The reason we are seeing such wrenching, brutal fights today is that the people with money and power who make and sell things know there is a worldwide market for their goods, and the most wealthy and powerful of all — the Big Six Wall Street banks who control assets equal to 64 percent of our economy — make their money mainly by financial manipulation and speculation. I mean if you can make money by securitizing subprime mortgages, selling them as AAA rated, and then take a short position so that when they blow up for your clients, you make billions, who needs a middle class? During the New Deal, the wealthy and powerful didn’t like what was going on very much, but they were getting their asses kicked politically by FDR, so there wasn’t a lot they could do about it. In the post-World War II decades (1945-1975), a lot of the business community was making really good money because union workers, newly economically secure retirees, veterans who had college educations because of the GI Bill, and other working class people whose incomes were rising, were buying a lot of their products: homes, cars, TV sets, appliances, and all the other wonders of that era. Business leaders might try to tinker around the edges, but they also realized there were benefits to them in that strong, stable American middle class. With the globalization and financialization (deregulated bankers getting more and more reckless with other people’s money) of the economy, and the steady weakening of unions, it began to occur to a lot of the big money guys that made America didn’t need a financially strong middle class or retirees with money anymore. If they could make money selling to Europeans and Brazilians and Chinese and Indian folks, or just by taking other people’s money and place big bets that no one but them understood on the Wall Street casino, what good were workers with decent wages, an American safety net, or those annoying unions? The result has been an ever-rising attack over the last three-plus decades on unions, middle-class wages, and the safety net. The examples are abundant: deregulation of transportation, energy prices, the financial sector, and other industries; rampant union busting and blatant violations of the National Labor Relations Act; trade deals with Mexico, China, and other low wage, no environmental rules countries; repeated attempts to privatize and/or defund Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid; repeated cuts to all manner of domestic programs. Added to all this, especially in the last 10 years, has been skyrocketing inflation in the most essential items for middle-class families, while their incomes have been stagnant. As I wrote in a memo earlier this month: “…over the last decade, income levels for middle class families have stayed essentially flat, while the cost of living for most basic household necessities have gone up considerably: average grocery costs for a family of four have gone up more than $200 a month in the last decade; the average American had to spend about $3,000 more on their health care per year than they did at the beginning of the decade; household energy costs have been climbing at about 8 percent a year; in early 2000, the average price per gallon of a tank of gas was $1.31, while in January 2010 it was $3.06; and for those families with kids in college, tuition and fees have gone up an average of almost 6 percent a year each of the last 10 years. Now, with far-right Republicans having swept into power in important states across the country in the 2010 landslide, the Wall Street guys and right-wing ideologues have decided this is their moment. We will be seeing the most extreme proposals imaginable in the coming days to break unions, destroy the safety net, and wreck the middle class, which is why taking these guys on in full battle gear is so important. Here is what is most important to remember about what the Republicans, extreme right, and Wall Street guys are trying to do: it goes against the entire political theory this country was founded on. Remember the Federalist Papers, those essays Madison, Hamilton, and John Jay wrote to distill the essence of the new Constitution to the American public? They focused on the fundamental idea of pluralism: that this new form of democratic republic could only survive if competing interests, constituencies, regions, industries all were represented, and all had enough power to keep any of the others from controlling the government. What the founders believed to their core was that if any one industry or region or powerful interest became too dominant, it would destroy a democratic form of government. That fundamental danger is very much in front of us today. A small collection of stunningly wealthy and overwhelmingly powerful companies have become dominant in our government and our economy, and they are a very real threat to the American way. These companies and their allies — some who really share their ideology, some just being compensated for their service — are now trying to do what people with overwhelming power usually do: crush the last vestiges of opposition so they don’t have to worry about anyone challenging them again. Unions are one of the few pockets of strength left, and merely weakening them is no longer enough: they have to be crushed. The American system of checks and balances can be frustrating to those who want to see big changes made, but it is as foundational to the American system as any other idea there is. A system where the last institutions with any ability to push back on the big banks and businesses who generally dominate our economy and politics are destroyed should be terrifying to every American. The good news is that the people of Wisconsin are not buying the corporate right’s BS. Check out this great new poll from Wisconsin ; the governor is getting totally hammered in public opinion. The other good news is that we can all join the people in Wisconsin who are fighting back. This Saturday, there will demonstrations at every state capitol and in every major city . Help fight for your democracy this weekend. Help fight for the American way, and a check on the power of big business.
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Looks like Scott Walker’s prank phone call may end up getting him in some trouble with their Government Accountability Board and his remarks about bringing in agent provocateurs to cause trouble at the rallies isn’t sitting too well with the voters. Ed Schultz discussed Governor Walker’s conversation with the fake Koch brother with The Nation’s John Nichols who filled Ed in on some of the latest developments in Wisconsin. NICHOLS: The governor’s not walking a fine line Ed. He tripped off the cliff. The fact of the matter is that Wisconsin has the toughest ethics laws in the nation. We pride ourselves on that. That goes back more than a hundred years to the progressive era with Bob La Follette. Those ethics laws require that an elected official keep faith with the people of Wisconsin. Those statements raise deep concerns here in Madison and around the state. The former Attorney General of Wisconsin, Peg Lautenschlager told me tonight that she is in the reviewing this, of the transcript of this conversation, for several hours found what she determined to be multiple ethics, election law and labor law violations. And she will tomorrow morning suggest that the state Government Accountability Board begin to review those ethics violations. Ed Schultz asked Nichols if the Republicans running the state would allow the investigation to go forward. NICHOLS: The Government Accountability Board is an independent, non-partisan board, staffed by former judges who are elected in a non-partisan manner without any Republican or Democratic control. Nichols wasn’t sure where the investigation would end up going and pointed out to Schultz that the residents of Wisconsin aren’t too happy with some of the other statements he made during the call as well. NICHOLS: But second, there’s a moral component to this. People around Wisconsin are talking tonight about the fact that they brought their children to peaceful, very attractive and popular rallies in Madison and other communities and now they find out that their governor says that he considered sending agent provocateurs into those rallies to screw things up and cause trouble, perhaps to begin violence and he only decided not to do it, not because he’s worried for the people of his state, but because he was worried that it might not play well politically. That’s a very troubling thing to have a governor of an American state talking about. It looks like the tactics being used by these Koch brother teabaggers are finally coming back to bit them.
Continue reading …Activists, trade unionists and students could face death penalty after police raid meeting on Middle East uprisings Forty-six people in Zimbabwe have been charged with treason, and some allegedly beaten by police, after watching videos of the uprisings in Egypt and Tunisia The activists, trade unionists and students were at a meeting on Saturday titled Revolt in Egypt and Tunisia: What lessons can be learnt by Zimbabwe and Africa?, when it was raided by police who seized a video projector, two DVDs and a laptop. The group was detained in police cells and transferred to a notorious maximum security prison on Wednesday night. Treason can be punishable by death in Zimbabwe. Prosecutors allege that Munyaradzi Gwisai, a labour activist and former MP, and the other participants were conducting the meeting to “organise, strategise and implement the removal of the constitutional government of Zimbabwe … the Egyptian way”. In court documents, prosecutors said those present watched video footage of the Egyptian revolt that brought down Hosni Mubarak after nearly three decades in power. They alleged that the Zimbabwean participants took turns making speeches calling for a revolt against president Robert Mugabe’s 31-year authoritarian rule . But Gwisai’s wife, Shantha Bloemen, currently in New York, said: “The fact they had a meeting is a regular event. They often have seminars on workers’ rights. They watch documentaries about social issues and the fact they were watching the topical issues of the day is unsurprising. “No one would deny they want a better Zimbabwe but it’s a big leap from there to say they’re planning to make a serious threat against anyone. The whole thing is ridiculous.” Bloemen alleged incidents of police brutality. “Some of the ringleaders were definitely bruised and beaten during interrogation in the first two days. They’re being portrayed as radical lefties but they’re just regular people who want change in Zimbabwe.” She added: “I spoke to Munya yesterday on his way to the courtroom. He was guarded on the phone and telling jokes. At that point they thought the case would be heard quickly and there was generally a lot of solidarity in the group. “No one thought it would be a charge of treason. It’s clearly being driven by a political agenda. I think the strategy of the regime at the moment is to stall it for as long as possible for propaganda value, to instill fear in people.” The activists, including 11 women, appeared in dirty, soiled clothing in court on Wednesday. Gwisai wore a T-shirt emblazoned with the legend “World at a crossroads”. Human Rights Watch condemned the “politically motivated charges”. Daniel Bekele, its Africa director, said: “The Zimbabwe authorities should immediately free the activists and drop these outrageous charges. Arresting people for watching a video on the historic events in the Middle East is a transparent pretext to block peaceful criticism of the government.” Zimbabwe Robert Mugabe Egypt Middle East Tunisia Protest David Smith guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …President Ali Abdullah Saleh has instructed security forces to protect protesters who call for an end his 32-year rule. At least 15 people have been killed since anti-government demonstrations began on February 16. Al Jazeera’s Hashem Ahelbarra reports from the capital Sanaa, where thousands have gathered near the university.
Continue reading …If Time-magaziner-turned-WH-press-sec Jay Carney ever tires of defending Pres. Obama, Norah O'Donnell clearly seems ready to step in . . . When on today's Morning Joe Donny Deutsch described PBO as having a passive leadership style as evidenced by his approach to Libya, health care and other issues, an indignant O'Donnell piped up, defending the president's passivity. View video after the jump. Norah's point was that PBO couldn't risk a more aggressive approach, given that Americans remain at risk in Libya. Maybe so.
Continue reading …At least 26 nations have begun efforts to get their citizens out of Libya and to safety. A military Hercules aircaraft was en route to Tripoli on Thursday to collect British citizens, and Turkey says it’s mounted the biggest evacuation effort in its history. An Algerian who landed safely in his home country, told Al Jazeera that it took him four days to get to the airport in Tripoli, the capital of Libya. Al Jazeera’s James Bays speaks to Imran Garda after returning from Tripoli, where he heard first-hand accounts of people caught up in the violence.
Continue reading …A former member of Gaddafi’s closest circle gives an insight into the Libyan leader’s state of mind.
Continue reading …With thousands desperate to flee Gaddafi’s crackdown on protesters, Tripoli airport has become “logjammed”. Al Jazeera’s James Bays tells us of the scenes of despair he witnessed – as Gaddafi loyalist police beat people trying to enter the airport.
Continue reading …