Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 1691)
Homophobic Pastor "hands in my pants" Storms calls himself a hypocrite

Click here to view this media So Pastor Grant Storms says he’s not a pedophile, but that he had previously viewed pornography an hour before and just opened his pants while he was parked in his van beside a park full of children and stuck his hand in his underwear, but he’s not into kids. Naw. he probably got an urge and couldn’t wait to get home. He should have called himself a pervert instead. WDSU: The Rev. Grant Storms called himself a “hypocrite” because of his Friday arrest on accusations of masturbating in a public park. Jefferson Parish Sheriff’s deputies charged him with obscenity after two women claimed they saw him touching himself while watching children on the playground at Lafreniere Park.Storms said in a news conference Tuesday that he was not watching the children, but he did have his hand in his pants. “That Friday I was reclined in the chair in the van, and I had opened my pants and I had my hand in my underwear,” Storms said. “I’m not a pedophile. I’m not a child molester, and I don’t go exposing myself to children.”He apologized to those he has hurt, and he said he was sorry for targeting Decadence, an annual gay festival in the French Quarter.”I understand the hypocrisy. I understand it clearly, and it deeply hurts me. And when I look back, there are a lot of things I would have done differently,” he said.Storms said he is seeking help for a problem with pornography, which he called a recent issue. Storms said he had viewed pornography Friday about an hour before his arrest in the park. It’s a pretty common practice any Evangelist will tell you to view porn only a couple of times which will then turn you into an uncontrollable whacking freak that needs the open air to do the deed. His apology makes no sense when he gets into the specifics of what he did. I would suggest that the urge was so great he cared not who would see him. If we’re to believe his explanation then can you imagine if he had spent more time in front of the porn what he would have done next?

Continue reading …
The flight into Egypt and Tunisia

Libyan officials have stolen money and phones from fleeing families, but order reigns at Djerba airport despite huge crowds After five days of sleeping in a tent with her husband and 10 children on the Tun isian side of the border with Libya, Saba Rouher was near the end of her ordeal: awaiting her was a check-in desk at Tunisia’s Djerba airport and a flight to Cairo. The 33-year-old Egyptian had spent 11 years working as an agricultural labourer in Libya, but now she was glad to see the back of her adoptive country. At the border crossing, the family had been relieved of their cash and the sim card of their mobile phone by people she identified as Libyan officials, before being waved through with the few possessions they could salvage in the scramble to flee. “On the Libyan side there was nothing,” she said bitterly, hoisting the youngest of her brood on to her hip. “In Tunisia the people welcomed us. They gave us water and food, and a telephone so we could call our families.” Rouher didn’t know who had organised her flight to Cairo, but it is likely to have been one of seven chartered by the UK government, carrying about 1,400 evacuees. The family was heading back to an uncertain future, but she said: “It’s my country and God will help us.” The line in which the Rouhers stood was one of dozens snaking through the Djerba airport departure concourse. Among the thousands desperate to return to places they considered home, despite many years as migrant workers in Libya, were Egyptians, Vietnamese, Chinese, Bangladeshis, Sudanese and Pakistanis. They were the lucky ones; many thousands more were still crammed in camps 150km away on the border, uncertain of when they would be bussed to the airport. According to the UNHCR, the UN refugee agency, there were still about 30,000 more waiting on the Libyan side trying to get into Tunisia. At times it looked as though the airport authorities would be overwhelmed by the crush of people arriving every few minutes in packed buses and coaches. Rows of men slept on blankets on the floor; people crowded round a makeshift distribution kiosk for bread, biscuits, water and milk; suitcases, battered cardboard boxes and overflowing carrier bags were piled up all over the floor. One man, presumably one of the thousands of migrant construction workers in Libya, was still wearing his hard hat. Somehow, order triumphed over chaos. Volunteer marshals directed evacuees to the right queues while others helped those who had lost passports and travel documents in the scramble to leave Libya. Cleaners constantly traversed the concourse, sweeping up rubbish and washing down the toilets. Eleanora Servino, of the International Organisation for Migration, who had been at the airport almost continuously since Sunday and would stay “until we’ve got everyone out”, said there was now an efficient system in place. Evacuees were being registered at the border, she said, and were only brought to the airport when it was known they had a seat on a plane. About 70% of the evacuees were Egyptian and the country’s foreign ministry had a team at Djerba to deal with the flood. “However many we put on planes, there are more coming,” said Nagui Ghaba, a foreign ministry volunteer. Thousands were camped in stadiums and community centres between the border and Djerba, he said. The response of the Tunisian people had been “wonderful”, he said. “People are donating food and providing shelter. Some have gone in their own cars to the border to help with transport.” Inside the food distribution kiosk, George Lathourakis, 55, was swaying on his feet after 21 straight hours of handing out bread and water. “I’m not tired – I’m upset,” he said, gesturing to boxes of biscuits and fruit juice. “Everything you see has been donated by local people. We need more food but we don’t see anything coming from the international community.” The UK government has flown out blankets, tents and other supplies, but after consulting the IOM and UNHCR had concluded that assisting with the airlift was “the most useful thing we could do”, according to Chris Kiggell, a spokesman for the Department for International Development in London. The aim was to have three planes in circulation between Djerba and Cairo at any given time. The effort would go on at least until Sunday, by which time DfID hoped to have airlifted 6,000 Egyptians at a cost of up to £4m. Then, he said, the situation would be reviewed. Andrew Mitchell, the international development secretary, is to visit camps along the Libyan-Tunisian border to make his own assessment. Back at the airport, Ngo The Lien, 28, a Vietnamese builder, said he had been waiting 12 days to leave the region. “I’m going because of the war. People came with guns at night. It was very frightening. I have lost everything.” Abdur Razzak, 25, a Bangladeshi storeman with a building firm in Tripoli, was one of many who reported the theft of money and mobile phones. He had little idea of the causes of the uprising, saying only: “There were two groups fighting and I saw people being killed.” One of few women amid thousands of men, Zhu Yan, 24, a translator with a Chinese railway company, said Libyans had trashed their homes and robbed them. “I am very happy to be going home. We are the lucky ones.” Libya Arab and Middle East protests Middle East Egypt Tunisia Harriet Sherwood guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Scott Walker Brings In The Ringers For His Budget Speech

I think this might be the strangest story yet in the Wisconsin budget saga. The protesters got an injunction that they couldn’t be locked out of the Capitol, but Walker did it anyway. So they stood outside making noise while Walker gave his speech to a bunch of designated seat-fillers. Many of the state’s Democratic officials moved their desks outside the building and held office hours in the cold: enlarge The Awl’s Abe Sauer is at the Wisconsin state house with press credentials, and he describes the scene after rogue governor Scott Walker defied a court order and violated state law by locking the public out of the capitol. But then something even weirder and creepier happened: a cadre of out-of-town ringers in suits were smuggled into the gallery through the civil defense tunnels to bleat their approval for Walker’s budget proposal: Walker entered to thunderous applause, though not from the Democrats, who refused to rise. At least two-thirds of the East audience galley was loudly applauding but they had nothing on the West coast. It was now clear who the men in business attire were. Nearly without exception, the west gallery was all men in black suits and, when the governor said something meaningful, they all rose and applauded, and they did it with verve and volume. I’m not saying these guys were not from Wisconsin, but if you know Wisconsin, you know for a fact that even for most businessmen, black suits are not part of the wardrobe. In general, the only time one will see a large gathering of Wisconsin men in black suits is at a funeral, or, apparently at a Governor Walker budget address. Reporter Kristin Knutsen found evidence that many of these ringers may have entered through the capitol’s access tunnels, noting the presence of the Division of Criminal Investigation–the same officers I saw upstairs outside the Assembly chambers following the address escorting unidentified men.

Continue reading …

I’m trying to absorb the news in the NYT today that “NATO” helicopters (probably Army Apaches) shot up a group of children who were picking up firewood near a forward operating base that was under fire by insurgents using a mortar. This FOB was in an eastern province on the border of Afghanistan, a dangerous area in which to operate. ISAF promptly owned up and apologized for killing “nine civilians.” Civilians? That’s a pretty

Continue reading …
From The "Too Petty For Words" File, Boehner Gets Rid Of Eco-Tableware In Congress Cafeteria

enlarge Really, there’s no depths to which the GOP majority will not sink. In yet another act of thumbing his nose at Democrats, John Boehner has ended the Green Initiative program in the Congress cafeteria, replacing all the eco-tableware with regular petroleum-based plastic ware and styrofoam . In the first move toward phasing out part of Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi ‘s (D-Calif.) ” Green the Capitol ” program, polystyrene cups were reintroduced this week as an option for coffee drinkers in the Capitol Carry-Out, the building’s mini-cafeteria. The basement eatery had been part of Pelosi’s “Greening” program since 2007, when Democrats took control of the House. The program brought climate-friendly vending machines and compact fluorescent lightbulbs to the Capitol; caused the Capitol Power Plant to switch from burning coal to natural gas; and reduced energy and water consumption in Capitol buildings by 23 percent and 32 percent, respectively, according to an April 2010 report . But it was the $475,000 composting program in the House-side cafeterias that stirred the most controversy. Designed to cut down on waste, the program instituted the use of biodegradable utensils and trays made of cornstarch — an idea that may have worked better in theory than in practice, as it led to take-away boxes that leaked, spoons that melted and forks that broke when stuck into so much as a chicken tender. Rep. Dan Lungren (R-Calif.), chairman of the Committee on House Administration, announced last month that the program would be suspended indefinitely, contending that “it is neither cost-effective nor energy-efficient.” God forbid we inconvenience the lawmakers a little bit. Just a little extra effort can save thousands of pounds of non-biodegradable plastic and other petroleum products from going into a landfill. But no, not for these lawmakers. I actually am not a big fan of the cornstarch utensils because of the aforementioned breaking problems, but we have invested in some travel flatware that my kids and husband use for lunches and I can wash easily. The cornstarch trays and bowls feel like real plastic and actually work great in my experience, plus they’re compostable. And styrofoam cups for coffee…c’mon, you pantywaists. Even Starbucks uses cardboard (and that’s only if you don’t bring your own cup , like I do, with a discount for doing so.) Just a little extra effort can save thousands of pounds of non-biodegradable plastic and other petroleum products from going into a landfill. Still, you could look at this as simply a petty little act of a party who refuses to look at the damage we’ve done to the environment with an adult eye, but you haven’t heard the punchline. Guess who got the contract for the new environmentally-unfriendly products ? Former Koch Industries executive George Wurtz owns WinCup, which supplies the styrofoam cups now littering the building following the House GOP’s decision to phase out biodegradable cups from a Capitol lunchroom. House Republicans announced in January that they would end a program to place compostable cups, containers and utensils in the House-side mini-cafeteria, a direct shot at former Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s “Green the Capitol” initiative, which did away with styrofoam cups in 2007. Suspending the program resulted in business for Wurtz, a former executive of Koch Industries subsidiary Georgia-Pacific LLC. GOP leaders did not handpick Wurtz’s company, however — that decision rested with Restaurant Associates, which manages the cafeteria. How convenient. Wurtz is also a former executive with Phillip Morris, so he’s had a long history of adding pollution to people’s lives. But of course, all of this begs the question: where are the jobs, Speaker Boehner?

Continue reading …
Egypt’s prime minister, Ahmed Shafiq, resigns on eve of rally

Shafiq, who was appointed by ousted president Hosni Mubarak at height of protests, is replaced by former transport minister Essam Sharaf The Egyptian prime minister appointed by the ousted president Hosni Mubarak has resigned, military rulers have said, meeting a key demand of the opposition protest movement. In a failed attempt to quell the anti-government protests, Mubarak named former air force officer Ahmed Shafiq prime minister shortly after the unrest began on 25 January. Mubarak stepped down on 11 February and the military took control of the country, but Shafiq remained in office as the head of a caretaker government. A brief statement posted on the military’s official website said it had chosen the former transport minister Essam Sharaf as the new prime minister and asked him to form a new caretaker cabinet to run the government throughout a transition back to civilian rule. Sharaf served in the cabinet between 2004 and 2006. He resigned amid an uproar over a series of deadly train accidents blamed on government negligence. Sharaf, an engineer by profession, visited the anti-Mubarak protesters in Cairo’s Tahrir Square, the uprising’s centre, which endeared him to the youth groups behind the opposition movement. Mohamed ElBaradei, a leading pro-democracy activist and Noble peace prize laureate, welcomed Shafiq’s departure and thanked the military for “listening to the people”. “Today [the] old regime has finally fallen. We are on the right track,” ElBaradei said, on his Twitter account. ElBaradei is a likely presidential candidate, but his credentials as a leader are persistently questioned by some because of the decades he spent abroad, first in the Egyptian diplomatic service and later as a UN official. “Let us all get down to work and start rebuilding our country. We want the world to know that Egypt is open for business,” said ElBaradei, the former head of the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency. While he is not tainted by corruption like most politicians in Egypt, many believe he is out of touch with the day-to-day problems facing the country’s poor majority. Leaders of the 18-day uprising that forced out Mubarak had been pressing the military to fire Shafiq, arguing that a prime minister sworn in by the ousted leader should not stay in office. They also argued that his cabinet was filled with figures from the old regime. “First, we ousted Mubarak. Secondly, we got rid of Shafiq. We have become again the owners of this country,” said Bassem Kamel, a member of the coalition involved in the uprising. “We are still awaiting for the other demands to be met.” The revolt’s leaders also want Mubarak’s National Democratic party dissolved, along with the hated state security agency, blamed for some of the worst human rights violations during Mubarak’s rule. Other demands include the prosecution of security officials behind the deaths of protesters and the release of political prisoners. The prompt acceptance by the military of Shafiq’s resignation shows the sensitivity of the ruling generals to the demands of the uprising’s leaders, but many in Egypt now believe the military should put its foot down and focus on restoring law and order. The youth groups behind the revolution had planned a large rally on Friday to push for Shafiq to step down, but the demonstration will now be used to press for other demands. Shafiq’s resignation came a day after he made a widely criticised appearance on a popular talkshow, in which he defended the state security agency and sought to distance himself from Mubarak, a long-time friend since the two served in the air force. Shafiq, who was the civil aviation minister in the previous cabinet, was grilled by other guests on the programme, including the best-selling novelist Alaa al-Aswani. Since Mubarak was ousted, Egypt has been gripped by a crimewave not seen in years, with a marked rise in armed robberies, arson and street battles between rival criminal gangs over territory. The security forces, hated by many for their perceived brutality against the protesters, have yet to fully take back the streets. They numbered about 500,000 on the eve of the protests. The military police, meanwhile, has stepped in to fill the vacuum, but does not have the intelligence capabilities or manpower to police the country efficiently. Beside security, one of the main tasks facing Sharaf is to revive an economy hit hard by the protests. The stock market has been closed for more than a month and tourists have begun to trickle back in small numbers. Investor confidence has also been badly hurt by the dozens of criminal investigations into corruption allegations against senior officials from the former regime. In an unrelated development, state television said that Mubarak and his family had retained a defence lawyer in the face of the corruption allegations. On Tuesday, the attorney general, Abdel Meguid Mahmoud, seized the funds of the ousted leader, his wife, two sons and their wives and imposed a travel ban on all six. The station did not say who would represent the family or give any other details. Egypt Middle East Protest Hosni Mubarak Mohamed ElBaradei guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
No Labels Issues Press Release Confirming It’s Irrelevance

Remember No Labels? You can be forgiven if you have completely forgotten about that organization since it appears to have died at birth despite the hype given to it back in December by several in the mainstream media including Washington Post Reporter Philip Rucker who wrote this plug for the organization that is notable for its almost instant fade from national consciousness: It will form a political action committee to help defend moderate candidates of both parties against attack from the far right and the far left, said John Avlon, a founding member and one-time speechwriter for former New York mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani (R). “There's this idea that somehow walking in lock step with a party is courageous,” Avlon said. “I think it's conformity. . . . That's the opposite of courageous. It's cowardly.” Since then there has been almost zero news relating to No Labels. Ironically the only tiny bit of news that seeped out from No Labels was the controversy over its label since the artwork was apparently lifted (polite word for “stolen”) from the label of another organization. Other than that very minor controversy, No Labels has elicited a collective yawn from anybody who noticed…and most people didn't even know they existed in the first place. And now, as if confirming it's own irrelevance, No Labels has issued this press release which has been completely ignored by the media, including even Philip Rucker: WASHINGTON, March 1, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — The following statement was released today by No Labels Co-Founders Mark McKinnon and Nancy Jacobson at a press conference on Capitol Hill with over 200 No Labels state leaders: “We know that we are not going to solve our significant budgetary challenges unless we get everyone at the table and everything on the table. And that means everyone, not just our elected representatives. “Increasingly, politicians are held hostage by powerful interest groups. So, we need them at the table as well. Today No Labels is calling on representatives of the Tea Party and MoveOn.org to come together to discuss and debate the key budget issues facing our country. “Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski have graciously agreed to host a discussion between leaders of these organizations on their MSNBC program Morning Joe. “Let's stop the fighting and start the fixing. We need this discussion as soon as possible, for the good of our country.” So this will accomplish what other than generate a slight bit of publicity for MSNBC's Morning Joe show? The real message of this No Labels press release seems to be: “Yoo! Hoo! In case you haven't noticed we still exist…at least in our own minds.” Another not so secretly liberal organization pretending to be non-partisan hyped by the MSM bites the dust yet again. At least with Annabel Park of the Coffee Party we got some comedic entertainment in the form of her addressing her own navel with stream of consciousness psychobabble. From No Labels all we got was a collective yawn.

Continue reading …

Another day and another poll comes out in support of unions and against the arrogant and dangerous new breed of Republican Governor’s like Scott Walker who want to strip away collective bargaining. And it’s in the WSJ: Americans strongly oppose efforts to strip unionized government workers of their rights to collectively bargain, even as they want public employees to contribute more money to their retirement and health-care benefits, the latest Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll shows. Eliminating collective bargaining rights for public-sector workers over health care, pensions or other benefits would be either “mostly unacceptable” or “totally unacceptable,” 62% of those surveyed said. Only 33% support such limits. The results don’t bode well for Wisconsin’s newly elected Republican governor, Scott Walker , who is locked in a standoff with statehouse Democrats and unionized state workers over these rights. Many of the Republicans gearing up to take on President Barack Obama in 2012 have seized on the budget battle in Wisconsin, a crucial swing state, as evidence the country wants to dramatically scale back government spending. And how does the Tea Party feel about all of this? More than seven in 10 tea party backers feared GOP lawmakers wouldn’t go far enough in cutting spending. But more than half of all respondents fear Republicans will go too far. Among those most fearing spending cuts are younger voters, independents, seniors and suburban women, all of them usually key swing voters in national elections who potentially could turn against the GOP. “It may be hard to understand why someone would try to jump off a cliff” to solve the debt crisis, Mr. McInturff said of his fellow Republicans, “unless you understand that they are being chased by a tiger, and that tiger is the tea party.” Ouch. This story resonates, and it doesn’t put the GOP in a good light. Greg Sargent is tallying up the polls and four polls all show solid support for public workers and comes to the right conclusion. Indeed, the verdict is clear: Americans support public employees in this standoff. Whether that will impact the outcome of the fight, of course, remains to be seen. But the bigger story here — one that will ripple far beyond what happens in Wisconsin — is that public employees are not proving the easy scapegoat many predicted they would be, and when faced with the question of whether their fundamental union rights should be taken away, Americans have stepped up and answered with a firm No.

Continue reading …

Another day and another poll comes out in support of unions and against the arrogant and dangerous new breed of Republican Governor’s like Scott Walker who want to strip away collective bargaining. And it’s in the WSJ: Americans strongly oppose efforts to strip unionized government workers of their rights to collectively bargain, even as they want public employees to contribute more money to their retirement and health-care benefits, the latest Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll shows. Eliminating collective bargaining rights for public-sector workers over health care, pensions or other benefits would be either “mostly unacceptable” or “totally unacceptable,” 62% of those surveyed said. Only 33% support such limits. The results don’t bode well for Wisconsin’s newly elected Republican governor, Scott Walker , who is locked in a standoff with statehouse Democrats and unionized state workers over these rights. Many of the Republicans gearing up to take on President Barack Obama in 2012 have seized on the budget battle in Wisconsin, a crucial swing state, as evidence the country wants to dramatically scale back government spending. And how does the Tea Party feel about all of this? More than seven in 10 tea party backers feared GOP lawmakers wouldn’t go far enough in cutting spending. But more than half of all respondents fear Republicans will go too far. Among those most fearing spending cuts are younger voters, independents, seniors and suburban women, all of them usually key swing voters in national elections who potentially could turn against the GOP. “It may be hard to understand why someone would try to jump off a cliff” to solve the debt crisis, Mr. McInturff said of his fellow Republicans, “unless you understand that they are being chased by a tiger, and that tiger is the tea party.” Ouch. This story resonates, and it doesn’t put the GOP in a good light. Greg Sargent is tallying up the polls and four polls all show solid support for public workers and comes to the right conclusion. Indeed, the verdict is clear: Americans support public employees in this standoff. Whether that will impact the outcome of the fight, of course, remains to be seen. But the bigger story here — one that will ripple far beyond what happens in Wisconsin — is that public employees are not proving the easy scapegoat many predicted they would be, and when faced with the question of whether their fundamental union rights should be taken away, Americans have stepped up and answered with a firm No.

Continue reading …
‘On Faith’ Trumpets Theological ‘Strange Bedfellows’ Defending Planned Parenthood Federal Funding

Defending their “Shared commitment to women and children,” on the Washington Post/Newsweek's “On Faith” site, the Revs. Richard Cizik and Debra Haffner joined forces today support federal tax monies flowing to Planned Parenthood. Cizik, you may recall, is a bit of a media favorite because he hails from a generally theologically conservative tradition but has been moving leftward politically over the past few years. Haffner is liberal theologically and politically, a Unitarian-Universalist minister and the former president of the Sex Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS), a group that lobbies to end federal funding of abstinence-until-marriage sex ed programs . As we've noted, the On Faith feature often skews liberal in theology and politics, and the Cizik/Haffner tag-team fits hand-in-glove with the leftward tack of the site. Here's the duo's argument against defunding Planned Parenthood (emphases mine): Although we hold differing moral values about abortion , we share a commitment that because life is sacred, it should never be created carelessly or unintentionally. That is why we both support the Title X family planning program, which helps avert nearly one million pregnancies in the United States annually. That is why we have a shared belief in international family planning programs, because we know that maternal mortality around the world could be reduced by more than 70 percent by improved access to reproductive health services. We support domestic and international family planning because we know it reduces neonatal and maternal morbidity and mortality, including deaths attributable to unsafe abortions–and it helps build strong families and lives.

Continue reading …