Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 1687)

Matewan

No Comment

For anyone who might need a little reminder of what types of battles unions fought to bring us things like a 40-hour work week, no child labor, vacation days, decent wages, and not basically being slaves living in company housing owned by the corporations that employed them — watch this movie if you get a chance. I watched this film years ago and sadly this history is not taught in our classrooms in the United States of America. It’s a fictional depiction of what went on during the labor unrest in West Virginia in the 1920s, but it’s based on a real events and a reminder of just how violent things ended up being in West Virginia and across the country before working people in the United States finally were able to gain a lot of the rights that way too many of us take for granted right now. When you forget what it took to get so many of the rights we have in the first place, sadly it’s way too easy to give them back again without a fight. That’s what the politicians, Fox “News” and these astroturf teabaggers who are attacking unions as evil, greedy thugs are all counting on. From IMDb: Matewan (1987) : Mingo County, West Virginia, 1920. Coal miners, struggling to form a union, are up against company operators and gun thugs; Black and Italian miners, brought in by the company to break the strike, are caught between the two forces. Union activist and ex-Wobbly Joe Kenehan, sent to help organize the union, determines to bring the local, Black, and Italian groups together. Matewan (1987) – The Union Shootout in Matewan, West Virginia, May 19, 1920 And here’s more from one of Amazon’s reviews on the film : A little-known chapter of American labor history is brought vividly to life in this period drama from writer-director John Sayles. It’s a fictional story about labor wars among West Virginia coal miners during the 1920′s, but every detail is so right that the film has the unmistakable ring of truth. The tension begins when the Stone Mountain Coal Company of Matewan, West Virginia, announces a lower pay rate for miners, who respond by calling a strike under the leadership of a United Mine Workers representative (Chris Cooper). Proving strength in numbers, the miners are joined by black and Italian miners who initially resist the strike, and a fateful battle ensues when detectives hired by the coal company attempt to evict miners from company housing. Violence erupts in a sequence of astonishing, cathartic intensity, and Matewan achieves a rare degree of moral complexity combined with gut-wrenching tragedy. The film salutes a pacifist ideal while recognizing that personal and political convictions often must be defended with violence. To illustrate this point, Sayles enlisted master cinematographer Haskell Wexler, who creates the film’s authentic visual texture–a triumph of artistry over limited resources. The result is a milestone of independent filmmaking, and Matewan remains one of Sayles’s finest achievements. –Jeff Shannon

Continue reading …
Bozell Column: Sex and Super Mario

Most parents think of video games as a child's pursuit, especially the innocent ones. Many people who bought a Nintendo Wii video game system would consider this the most innocent of them all. They watch their children play Super Mario Brothers on it, or join the family in playing tennis or golf or baseball with their little childlike”Mii” characters on Wii Sports. I never imagined this game system would also be an orgy enabler. A new ad by the French game manufacturer Ubisoft advertises a new game for the Nintendo Wii suggestively titled “We Dare,” describing it as “a sexy, quirky party game that offers hilarious, innovative and physical, sometimes kinky, challenges. The more friends you invite to party, the spicier the play!” Here we go. In a YouTube ad for the game, two young couples are shown kissing the controller together, including both girls. Graphically, the game looks simplistic and cartoonish, a typical Super Mario adventure. As suggestive music plays, one of the girls puts the controller in the back of her skirt and goes over one of the men's knees for some simulated spanking time. Then the girls are spanking each other. Then the men are stripping. The ad ends with the screen going blurry and reading “Enter Parental Code.” That's merely an invitation to join in nudity and sex, since Ubisoft isn't really concerned about parental codes. The game just went on sale in Australia, and that country's silly supposed self-regulators gave it a meaningless PG rating. The local ad there included couples “stripping to their underwear” with “suggestions of pole dancing, group sex and partner swapping.” In England, it's a similar outrage. It’s been rated “12 Plus,” which has infuriated parents. Laura Pearson of Birmingham told London's Daily Mail: “I have a 13-year-old daughter, and if I knew she was playing such a highly charged sexual game with boys, I would be appalled. It is encouraging underage sex.” Ubisoft has no plans – yet – to sell the game in the United States, since we are considered more “puritanical” than Europe. That doesn't mean they won't try if the game sells well. On Twitter, Ubisoft teased: “Will you dare watch this sexy, quirky trailer for our new party game? We Dare (Europe) will spice up your parties.” It would be one thing if video-game manufacturers made a Mature-rated game for married adults. But that's not what Ubisoft did. They have produced a game tempting youngsters into group sex, partner-swapping, and homosexuality. An Ubisoft spokeswoman told the Melbourne Herald-Sun “The game is intended for an adult audience, absolutely….Honestly, the game can also be played in a non-flirty way. It is just open for interpretation.” This is disingenuous. Dressing this game in a simple Super Mario scheme is like putting a sex scene in a Thomas the Tank Engine game, but declaring it’s for adults only. It's saying you can play the game in ways Ubisoft didn't intend. Some children who didn't want to be prostitute-murdering drug dealers in the “Grand Theft Auto” games could simply goof around on their motorcycle, too. But that's not the experience the game makers were selling. When Microsoft's Xbox 360 one-upped

Continue reading …
Bozell Column: Sex and Super Mario

Most parents think of video games as a child's pursuit, especially the innocent ones. Many people who bought a Nintendo Wii video game system would consider this the most innocent of them all. They watch their children play Super Mario Brothers on it, or join the family in playing tennis or golf or baseball with their little childlike”Mii” characters on Wii Sports. I never imagined this game system would also be an orgy enabler. A new ad by the French game manufacturer Ubisoft advertises a new game for the Nintendo Wii suggestively titled “We Dare,” describing it as “a sexy, quirky party game that offers hilarious, innovative and physical, sometimes kinky, challenges. The more friends you invite to party, the spicier the play!” Here we go. In a YouTube ad for the game, two young couples are shown kissing the controller together, including both girls. Graphically, the game looks simplistic and cartoonish, a typical Super Mario adventure. As suggestive music plays, one of the girls puts the controller in the back of her skirt and goes over one of the men's knees for some simulated spanking time. Then the girls are spanking each other. Then the men are stripping. The ad ends with the screen going blurry and reading “Enter Parental Code.” That's merely an invitation to join in nudity and sex, since Ubisoft isn't really concerned about parental codes. The game just went on sale in Australia, and that country's silly supposed self-regulators gave it a meaningless PG rating. The local ad there included couples “stripping to their underwear” with “suggestions of pole dancing, group sex and partner swapping.” In England, it's a similar outrage. It’s been rated “12 Plus,” which has infuriated parents. Laura Pearson of Birmingham told London's Daily Mail: “I have a 13-year-old daughter, and if I knew she was playing such a highly charged sexual game with boys, I would be appalled. It is encouraging underage sex.” Ubisoft has no plans – yet – to sell the game in the United States, since we are considered more “puritanical” than Europe. That doesn't mean they won't try if the game sells well. On Twitter, Ubisoft teased: “Will you dare watch this sexy, quirky trailer for our new party game? We Dare (Europe) will spice up your parties.” It would be one thing if video-game manufacturers made a Mature-rated game for married adults. But that's not what Ubisoft did. They have produced a game tempting youngsters into group sex, partner-swapping, and homosexuality. An Ubisoft spokeswoman told the Melbourne Herald-Sun “The game is intended for an adult audience, absolutely….Honestly, the game can also be played in a non-flirty way. It is just open for interpretation.” This is disingenuous. Dressing this game in a simple Super Mario scheme is like putting a sex scene in a Thomas the Tank Engine game, but declaring it’s for adults only. It's saying you can play the game in ways Ubisoft didn't intend. Some children who didn't want to be prostitute-murdering drug dealers in the “Grand Theft Auto” games could simply goof around on their motorcycle, too. But that's not the experience the game makers were selling. When Microsoft's Xbox 360 one-upped

Continue reading …
ABC, NBC Play Moral Midgets for Access to Charlie Sheen

The saddest media bias on display this week was the desperate hunger and thirst for that slice of Ratings Heaven known as Charlie Sheen's Continuing Moral Collapse. He's been All Access Charlie, granting high Nielsens wherever he goes, speaking of how he is High on Himself and “bi-winning” with his two “goddesses” camped at his abode. Network interviewers have tried not to alienate their guest with tough questions. Washington Post TV writer Lisa de Moraes ably brought her trademark snark to this amoral parade. First there was ABC's 20/20 with Andrea Canning on Tuesday night: “It's no secret that you have an affinity for porn stars,” Canning told Sheen. “Well, I mean, wow, listen to that statement,” Sheen joshed back. “Why?” Canning asked, speaking for us all. “Well, look at what they do – look at what I do. Duh…They're the best at what they do and I'm the best at what I do and together it's like, it's on! Sorry, Middle America, yeah, I said it.” “Is it the same for prostitutes – is it that it's good sex?” Canning continued. “Who wants to deal with all the small talk and nonsense? You're paying for something that eliminates that. It makes sense to me,” Sheen explained. The Post writer then added that on Wednesday, when Sheen went live on “Today” with a very agreeable Jeff Rossen, “the sex goddesses had been transformed into Mary Poppins.”

Continue reading …
ABC, NBC Play Moral Midgets for Access to Charlie Sheen

The saddest media bias on display this week was the desperate hunger and thirst for that slice of Ratings Heaven known as Charlie Sheen's Continuing Moral Collapse. He's been All Access Charlie, granting high Nielsens wherever he goes, speaking of how he is High on Himself and “bi-winning” with his two “goddesses” camped at his abode. Network interviewers have tried not to alienate their guest with tough questions. Washington Post TV writer Lisa de Moraes ably brought her trademark snark to this amoral parade. First there was ABC's 20/20 with Andrea Canning on Tuesday night: “It's no secret that you have an affinity for porn stars,” Canning told Sheen. “Well, I mean, wow, listen to that statement,” Sheen joshed back. “Why?” Canning asked, speaking for us all. “Well, look at what they do – look at what I do. Duh…They're the best at what they do and I'm the best at what I do and together it's like, it's on! Sorry, Middle America, yeah, I said it.” “Is it the same for prostitutes – is it that it's good sex?” Canning continued. “Who wants to deal with all the small talk and nonsense? You're paying for something that eliminates that. It makes sense to me,” Sheen explained. The Post writer then added that on Wednesday, when Sheen went live on “Today” with a very agreeable Jeff Rossen, “the sex goddesses had been transformed into Mary Poppins.”

Continue reading …

So corporations have the right to free speech, but no personal privacy rights? Corporations: Salad dressing and a floor wax? I’m so confused! The Supreme Court of the United States ruled Tuesday that AT&T and other corporations do not have personal privacy rights under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The Freedom of Information Act requires federal agencies to make documents publicly available upon request, but contains an exemption for documents that “constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.” Claiming they were a “corporation citizen,” AT&T tried to use the personal privacy exemption to prevent the disclosure of federal government documents about the company. The unanimous decision in Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T, Inc. reversed a ruling by a US appeals court in favor the telecommunications company. “Personal’ in the phrase ‘personal privacy’ conveys more than just ‘of a person,’” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in his decision. “It suggest a type of privacy evocative of human concerns—not the sort usually associated with an entity like, say, AT&T.” “We reject the argument that because ‘person’ is defined for purposes of FOIA to include a corporation, the phrase ‘personal privacy’ in Exemption 7(C) reaches corporations as well,” he said. “The protection in FOIA against disclosure of law enforcement information on the ground that it would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy does not extend to corporations.” “We trust that AT&T will not take it personally,” Roberts added. “The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed.”

Continue reading …
Newstalgia Reference Room – Eric Sevareid On Vietnam -1966.

enlarge Eric Sevaried – maybe not extinct, but certainly a dormant breed of broadcast journalist. Click here to view this media It’s a debate exactly when the turning point of the Vietnam War occurred. Some say it was around 1966 (the year of this broadcast) and others say it was in 1968 at the time of the Tet Offensive. My own feeling is that the writing was most certainly on the wall as early as 1965 as reports of escalation, draft calls and body counts became a daily segment on most every news program. It was around 1966 that the mainstream news establishment began looking at the war and questioning its validity, as is evidenced by a special program from CBS Radio News which featured veteran correspondent Eric Sevareid reporting his impressions of that war in this June 21st broadcast. Eric Sevareid: “We try to apply Western logic and experience to this Oriental land. So we encourage the elections, envisage a Parliament and eventual civilian rule representing groups and regions. My own guess is that this process of democratizing would produces years of political turmoil before stability is reached. It will probably, though not certainly open a whole new Pandora’s box, all the quarrels in the country bursting out into the open. Vietnam, I think myself, is not to be compared with Korea or Greece where we were successful in these respects. A strong national sense and strong leaders existed in those countries. If this proves to be the trend as we try to democratize government in Vietnam then the immediate consequence would be a nightmare for us, for we should then have to involve ourselves deeper and deeper into their politics, their economy and more and more of the fighting and dying will be done by Americans and less and less by the Vietnamese.” It’s interesting that Sevareid brings up the subject of Western logic with reference to establishing our brand of Democracy in other countries (in that case Southeast Asia). A subject being brought to the forefront again in the Middle East with the recent protest movements and overthrows underway and certainly our foray into Iraq. But in 1966 the concern was whether or not Vietnam was winable and what was in store for the future. I guess the two parts to this post would be listening to a journalist like Sevareid and realizing how far we’ve gotten away from Journalistic integrity. And the other is how the lessons learned from Vietnam have somehow been forgotten. We had no idea what the future would be like in 1966 and we certainly have no idea now. Maybe that’s just the way it’s supposed to be.

Continue reading …

For Richer and For Poorer For Richer and Poorer – Teachers and Wall Street When will America’s teachers follow the lead of Wall Street and start making some sacrifices for the children? Jon Stewart & Company go to town on the blatant hypocrisy and utter foolishness of Wisconsin’s class war on teachers.

Continue reading …

Shep Smith: putting the liberal balance into Fox News Channel's fair-and-balanced reporting . . . On Fox Report this evening, Shep sneered at Gov. Walker's budget-repair bill, referring to it as “so-called” reform, sarcastically adding that as far as union members facing layoffs are concerned, “it's no repair to them.” Later, interviewing FNC's White House correspondent Mike Emanuel, a nervous Smith sought reassurance that Florida wasn't heading down Walker's Wisconsin path. View video after the jump. I'll be back with a transcript but in the meantime watch Shep make clear his sympathies aren't with Scott Walker. SHEP SMITH: First to Wisconsin, where the governor, Scott Walker, is making good on his threat to start sending out lay-off notices if the Senate didn't passed his so-called budget-repair bill by today.

Continue reading …
Gaddafi’s survival could end the Arab revolt | Simon Tisdall

If the uprising in Libya is to succeed, then international effort, via the Arab League, must help the people to help themselves The giddy prospect of a third “Facebook revolution” in the Middle East, with Libya swiftly following Tunisia and Egypt into a brave new post-autocratic era, is fading from view. The growing military and diplomatic stalemate , both inside and outside the country, suggests efforts to topple Muammar Gaddafi could fail, at least in the short term. His survival may, in turn, mark the beginning of the end of the Arab world revolt. Despite daily reports of aerial bombing and ground skirmishes, fighting between pro-Gaddafi forces and opposition groups remains sporadic and undirected. After the rebels’ significant early successes in seizing control of Benghazi, most of eastern Libya and some towns closer to Tripoli, their uncoordinated advance has lost momentum and stalled. Talk of a grand march on the capital remains just that – talk. Gaddafi is strengthening his grip on Tripoli, partly by terrorising its citizens . A new crackdown is expected after Friday prayers. But his efforts to take back opposition-held towns, notably Brega, have also been inconclusive. Regime air attacks, as reported by international media, appear curiously half-hearted and largely inaccurate. And thankfully, both sides’ casualties in the most recent fighting seem to be relatively light, notwithstanding an emotive claim by Susan Rice, the US ambassador to the UN, that Gaddafi is “slaughtering his people”. The military stand-off inside Libya is matched by paralysis outside the country over military intervention. The Americans are hesitant in the extreme. Defence secretary Robert Gates has repeatedly highlighted the risks inherent in any attempt to impose a no-fly zone , as mooted by David Cameron and others. Gates says, rightly, that in order to create such a zone, the US and its allies would first have to destroy Gaddafi’s air force and air defences – in effect, declare war. These defences are formidable, posing on paper at least a far greater challenge than that presented by Saddam Hussein’s regime in Iraq, or the Serbian military in Bosnia – two recent cases where no-fly zones were imposed. They include an estimated 100 MiG-25s and 15 Mirage F-1s equipped with air-to-air missiles and numerous Russian-made Sam ground batteries. Gaddafi can also call on 30 or more Russian helicopter gunships and four Boeing Chinooks. Mostly these assets do not appear to have been deployed so far. There’s diplomatic stalemate, too. After keeping mum while the crisis unfolded, Barack Obama called on Thursday for Gaddafi to stand down . But the US president offered no clue as to whether he had a plan to force him out, or indeed any plan at all for Libya. At the same time, Washington is rubbishing efforts by its arch enemy, Hugo Chavez, the Venezuelan leader, to set up an international commission to mediate a peace deal. “You don’t need an international commission to tell Colonel Gaddafi what he needs to do for the good of his country and the good of his people,” said the state department spokesman, PJ Crowley. “He should step aside, and for the good of his people, he should stop attacking them.” It’s not just the Americans. Neither the UN security council nor the EU has much to offer in the way of diplomatic initiatives. Having condemned Gaddafi, imposed largely symbolic sanctions, and agreed how awful the situation is, they have become spectators. Individual states such as Britain, France and Italy have launched laudable humanitarian relief operations. But these are stop-gap measures, not solutions. Likewise the Arab League and the African Union, who should be leading the way given their close structural relationship with Libya, issue statements and effectively do nothing. Perhaps, one day, the international criminal court will bring Gaddafi to justice. But don’t hold your breath. International impotence and division in the face of fast-moving political crises is nothing new. Direct intervention, as in Iraq in 2003 or Kosovo in 1999, is the exception, not the rule, and usually counter-productive. But there is no reason why the international community, including emerging powers such as China, India and Brazil, should not do more to help the Arabs help themselves. The proper channel for such engagement is via the Arab League, which says, for example, that it may impose its own no-fly zone on Libya but lacks capability and expertise. If Arab reform is to succeed, it needs more victories – and more scalps. Protesters in Bahrain, Algeria, Yemen, Oman and elsewhere who, like the opposition to Gaddafi, are pitted against intransigent and occasionally brutal regimes, must be watching Libya’s developing internal stalemate and the disjointed international response with dismay. The longer Gaddafi hangs on, the faster momentum behind the revolt across the rest of the Arab world may be lost. The overthrow of Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak raised great hopes for all. Gaddafi’s survival could break their hearts. Libya Muammar Gaddafi Arab and Middle East protests US foreign policy Tunisia Egypt Middle East United Nations Barack Obama David Cameron Simon Tisdall guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …