Radiation around the Fukushima Daiichi plant has reached levels damaging to human health, prime minister reveals Japan is facing the world’s biggest nuclear crisis for decades after radiation around its failing power plant hit levels damaging to human health following a fire and another possible explosion. Fifty technicians are still battling to cool reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi facility but non-essential personnel were ordered to leave. The government had already called in international help in tackling the spiralling crisis. The government ordered any inhabitants remaining in the 12-mile radius exclusion zone to leave immediately, told those between 12 miles and 19 miles away to stay indoors and imposed a 19-mile no-fly zone. Experts backed their assessment that health risks beyond that area were minimal at present. The news was a fresh blow for a region already reeling from the impact of Friday’s magnitude 8.9 earthquake and devastating tsunami. At least 2,400 have been confirmed dead, thousands are missing and millions remain without adequate food, fuel or water. Workers at the Fukushima plant have been battling since Friday to avert a catastrophe after cooling systems failed in the aftermath of the natural disaster. Hundreds of thousands of people have already been evacuated from areas within 12 miles of the facility as a precaution. Readings in parts of the facility hit levels indicating an immediate risk of damage to people without protective gear, the government’s chief spokesman, Yukio Edano, said. The prime minister, Naoto Kan, asked people to remain calm in a televised address but warned: “Radiation has spread from these reactors and the reading of the level seems high … There’s still a very high risk of further radioactive material coming out.” He added that workers were “putting themselves in a very dangerous situation” to try to contain the problems. With confidence diminishing in the Tokyo Electric Power Company’s ability to handle the crisis, Kan had already said he would personally lead a new joint response headquarters. Tokyo has asked both the United Nations nuclear watchdog for expert help and the US nuclear regulatory commission for equipment. Officials have also begun to distribute potassium iodide, which can help inhibit the uptake of radioactive iodide by the thyroid, to evacuation centres. This morning’s leak appears to have been caused by a fire at the number 4 unit, where spent fuel rods were stored. The nuclear safety agency said the blaze was extinguished several hours after it broke out. But the No 2 unit’s containment structure – which prevents radioactive materials from leaking in the event of meltdown – also appears to have been damaged after a possible explosion shortly afterwards. That is of particular concern because the building housing the reactor was damaged by the hydrogen blast at neighbouring unit 3, experts told Kyodo news agency. Edano told reporters that workers were continuing to inject water to cool units 1 to 3. The No 2 reactor was not as stable as the others, but the water injection was working “to a certain level”, he added. Tokyo Electric Power Company, the owners of the plant, admitted for the first time that there was a possibility of partial meltdown, Kyodo reported. Officials have already gauged that as a “high possibility”. Edano told reporters that beyond the 12-mile radius the level should be reduced to one where harm to human health would be minimal or non-existent, although that would depend on wind speed and direction. He said a “minimal amount” of radioactive material might spread to metropolitan areas, but not at harmful levels, adding: “We want you to keep calm. We can continue with our daily lives.” In Tokyo, experts detected slightly higher than normal radiation levels but said they were far below those that would pose a risk to health. Readings at the plant, taken at 10.20am, varied considerably. Edano told reporters that the highest level around one of the reactors was 400 millisieverts, with a reading of 100 millisieverts around another. Professor David Hinde, head of the department of nuclear physics at the Australian National University, said it was the worst nuclear accident since the Chernobyl disaster in 1986 but stressed it was on a far smaller scale. The maximum radiation level was “very, very serious” for workers on site, who would only be able to remain there for the briefest periods. But the risk to those outside the exclusion zone was very small, particularly when seen in the context of their situation as a whole. “Compared to the risk of being on a plain near the sea it’s negligible … No one is looking at the black smoke from the fires and wondering where those carcinogens are going,” he said. An expert told broadcaster NHK that the situation was “very grave”, warning that without protective gear a level of 100 millisieverts could be enough to cause male infertility in a short time. He also said those in the 12-mile to 19-mile zone should dust off their hair and clothes before entering their building, including brushing off the soles of their shoes. Once inside they should close windows and turn off air conditioning. Any laundry hanging out should be left outside. Japan’s central bank pumped billions more dollars into the economy as stocks plunged more than 10% on the back of the news, following a major injection on Monday. Japan Nuclear power Natural disasters and extreme weather Tania Branigan guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …• New explosion at nuclear plant, fears of leak • Dangerous levels of radiation at Fukushima plant • Government reveals fire in No 4 reactor • Death toll estimated at 10,000 in one prefecture • Read the latest summary of today’s events • Read the Guardian’s latest news story on the explosion 4.40am: Here’s the latest wrap-up on Fukushima from the Kyodo news agency: The government’s Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency said the explosion at the No 2 reactor may have damaged the ”suppression chamber,” a facility connected to the reactor’s container which is designed to cool down radiation steam and lower the pressure in the reactor. It said a sharp decline in the pressure level of the chamber suggests damage. Following the incident, the radiation level near the main gate of the Fukushima No. 1 plant exceeded the legal limit to reach 965.5 micro sievert per hour at 7:00 a.m. and jumped to 8,217 micro sievert at 8:31 a.m., the agency said. The latter amount is more than eight times the 1,000 micro sievert level to which people can safely be exposed in one year. Given that the building housing the reactor has already been damaged by Monday’s hydrogen blast at the neighboring No. 3 reactor, a spread of radiation outside the plant has become a serious threat, experts say. The possibility of a meltdown, in which fuel rods melt and are destroyed, ”cannot be ruled out” as the fuel rods have been damaged, the utility [Tepco] said. 4.31am: My colleague Matt Seaton hears a detail from the BBC’s World Service. 4.14am: The cumulative effects of the earthquake, tsunami and especially the potential nuclear disaster are weighing heavily on the Japanese economy, as would be expected. The Nikkei stock exchange in Tokyo has plunged by more than 12% today, well below the 9,000 level, while trading on the Topix exchange was suspended. The central bank is said to have injected $61bn in liquidity into the financial markets to ensure lending can continue in the worst areas during morning trading, followed by another $35bn later in the day (at least I think that’s right). So far the Nikkei index has lost nearly 20% since the start of the week. 4.02am: Kyodo reports: “Small amounts of radioactive substances detected in Tokyo”. It was from a Tokyo University monitoring post about five hours ago, some half an hour after the explosion in Fukushima. The amounts are still tiny and pose no hazard. Other monitoring posts in central Tokyo detected no changes in background radiation. 3.54am: It’s being reported on Twitter that Sky News, ITN, BBC and CNN are all moving reporters and camera crews away from the Fukushima plant, so don’t expect to see many pictures. 3.39am: The New York Times has a very pessimistic lead on its website right now , suggesting that a Chernobyl-style disaster is on the horizon – “Japan Faces Potential Nuclear Disaster as Radiation Levels Rise” is the headline: Japan’s nuclear crisis verged toward catastrophe on Tuesday, after an explosion at one crippled reactor damaged its crucial steel containment structure and a fire at another reactor spewed large amounts of radioactive material into the air, according to official statements and industry executives informed about the developments. It’s an excellent piece of reporting and well worth reading: The cascade of problems at Daiichi was initially difficult to interpret — with confusion compounded by incomplete and inconsistent information provided by government officials and executives of the plant’s operator, Tokyo Electric Power. But industry executives in close contact with officials in Japan said that the chain of events at Daiichi suggested that the authorities had come close to losing control of the situation, and that it would be difficult to maintain emergency seawater cooling operations at stricken reactors if a fire at a fourth reactor nearby was releasing large amounts of radioactive material — at least without threatening the health of emergency workers onsite. 3.24am: @peterdaou tweets: We can pretend climate change is a hoax, that BP’s spill vanished into thin air, but Japan’s nuclear disaster is a blistering wake-up call. 3.21am: This has now been confirmed by Japan’s nuclear safety agency which says that the fire at the No 4 reactor of the nuclear plant has been extinguished. 3.20am: Kyodo: “Fire at no 4 reactor apparently put out” – TEPCO 3.00am: From TimeOutTokyo, here is a list of the towns which need evacuating: Tamura-ku, Minami Souma Shi, Hirono Machi, Naraha-cho, Tomioka-cho, Ookuma-cho, Futaba-cho, Namie-cho, Katsurao-cho, Iidate Mura, Iwaki Shi (northeast area) 2.52am: To help put that all in context, here is the latest take from AP. (AP) Japan warned of an alarming radiation leak from a stricken nuclear power plant and told people nearby to stay indoors to avoid becoming sick in a rapidly escalating national crisis following last week’s earthquake and tsunami. In a nationally televised statement, Prime Minister Naoto Kan said radiation has spread from the three reactors of the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant in one of the hardest-hit provinces in Friday’s 9.0-magnitude earthquake and the ensuing tsunami. “The level seems very high, and there is still a very high risk of more radiation coming out,” Kan said. He warned there are dangers of more leaks and told people living within 19 miles (30 kilometers) of the Fukushima Dai-ichi complex to stay indoors to avoid radiation sickness. Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano said a fourth reactor at the complex was on fire and more radiation had been released. “Now we are talking about levels that can damage human health. These are readings taken near the area where we believe the releases are happening. Far away, the levels should be lower,” he said. 2.46am: Further information for residents from the expert on NHK. Those in the 20km- 30km zone should get inside, close windows and turn off airconditioning. If they have laundry outside they should leave it outside. If they have been outside they should dust off their hair and clothes before entering their building, including brushing off the soles of their shoes. 2.38am: An expert on NHK is now offering some explanation: “There is a lot of variation in the levels around the different reactors but the highest reading is at a level to harm human health. “We should stress these are the levels mentioned at the facility itself. The highest reading around one of the reactors is 400 milisieverts – the expert says miliSieverts are 1000 times greater than microSieverts. “A very grave situation is happening,” he says. “Even 100 milisieverts would be enough to cause infertility in exposed males; at 500 or more the lymphocytes in the blood will decrease. Clearly the 50 workers who remain will have protective gear. But without it, with that level of exposure, your health could be harmed in a very short time,” he says. The readings taken at 10.20 showed a level of 100 miliSieverts around the unit 4 reactor and 400 around unit 3. 2.25am: More from the question and answer session with Edano: The number 2 reactor is not as stable as number 1 and 3 but the water injection is working “to a certain level” he says. They believe the increases in radiation readings are due to the unit 4 fire, not the problems at unit 2. A bit more on the fire at unit 4: he says that spent fuel will not catch fire, but that they need to extinguish the fire because rising temperatures could cause the release of radioactive material. Asked about people living further away, he says a “minimal amount” of radioactive material could spread to far areas. But he said that would not be at levels that could harm human health. “We want you to keep calm. We can continue with our daily lives,” he said. The press conference has ended now. 2.22am: To clarify, the advice to stay indoors is for those within a 30km radius. 2.15am: As of 10.20am (Japanese time), they have taken readings which indicate levels of radiation that could impact human health. Edano has asked them to “embrace the information calmly”. “The readings were taken near the area where we believe the release of radioactive substances is taking place. The further away you are, the more values should go down.” He says beyond the 20km radius the level should be reduced to one where harm to human health would be minimal or non-existent. But he says that spread will of course depend on wind speeds and direction. He asks people to remain indoors so they are not exposed to any radiation that may come their way. He says he has received a report there is a “very high probability” some portion of the container vessel at the number 2 reactor was damaged. He is now responding to questions. 2.09am: Yukio Edano, the government’s chief spokesman, is now on. He’s saying there’s a fire in the number four unit. There are no fuel rods in there but it still contains spent fuel rods. (The unit was under renovation at the time of the quake and tsunami). He says there seems to have been a hydrogen explosion (as at units 1 and 3) in that unit too. There were not previously thought to be problems with unit 4. The translation is slightly confusing, but the gist seems to be they believe there is a leak of radioactive material from unit 4. More from Edano: The blast from Unit 2 followed the Unit 4 problems. There appears to be a release of steam from number two. This could be hydrogen he says. They are continuing to inject water at units 1 to 3 2.05am: Prime minister Naoto Kan has begun his address to the nation by asking people to listen to his message calmly. According to the translation by broadcaster NHK he warned: “Radiation has spread from these reactors and ‘the reading of the level seems high’. There’s still a very high risk of further radioactive material coming out.” He has asked anyone remaining in the 20km evacuation zone around the number 1 plant and the 10km zone around the number 2 plant to leave. Hundreds of thousands have already been evacuated. He a said workers were “putting themselves in a very dangerous situation” to try to contain the problems. He again requested people to remain calm. 1.55am: The Associated Press now has the latest on the death toll, which has risen to 2,414. (AP) Japanese police say the official death toll from last week’s massive earthquake and tsunami has risen to 2,414. Police said Tuesday that a big share of the deaths were in Miyagi prefecture, where 1,254 people are confirmed dead. The number of people officially missing is at 3,118. But regional officials said they believe that tens of thousands may have been swept away by the tsunami that devastated a long stretch of Japan’s northeastern coast Friday. You can read the Guardian’s latest news piece on the situation here. 1.46am: The nuclear situation in Japan is developing rapidly and we will bring you updates as they come through. A third explosion in four days has hit a struggling nuclear plant in Japan’s stricken north east this morning. The plant’s operators said its reading had climbed to 8,217 microsieverts per hour – described by broadcaster NHK as equivalent to eight times the radiation a person would usually experience in a year. It later dropped sharply, the broadcaster said. The peak was still far below the level which would cause immediate damage to health. 1.37am: Here is a summary of some of the key developments over the last 24 hours in Japan: • A third explosion in four days rocked a crippled nuclear power plant in northeastern Japan on Tuesday morning as authorities struggled to avert a catastrophic release of radiation. The latest explosion at the Fukushima Dai-ichi happened in the plant’s Unit 2 near a suppression pool, which removes heat under a reactor vessel, according to the plant owner, Tokyo Electric Power Co. A government minister said it was “highly likely” that the fuel rods inside the reactor might melt. Radiation levels near the site have risen. • Tens of thousands are still unaccounted for as the official deathtoll reached 2,800, while bodies continue to be washed ashore four days after the tsunami triggered by the earthquake. Almost two million households remain without power in the north of Japan, where snow is forecast later this week, while around 1.4 million households have no running water. Those with power are being affected by rolling blackouts as electricity shortages force reductions in service in some areas. • The International Atomic Energy Agency says the Fukushima crisis is unlikely to become another Chernobyl. Authorities have set up a 20km (12 mile) exclusion zone around the Fukushima Daiichi plant. Meanwhile, the US agreed to Japan’s formal request for supplies and equipment to tackle the crisis. • Japanese stocks took a hammering when the Tokyo Stock Exchange opened on Tuesday and saw its benchmark Nikkei 225 decline to its lowest point since early October 2008. Efforts to limit the financial devastation wreaked by the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear power crisis continued with Japan’s central bank planning to inject $85bn billion into the economy to help the banking system to function as many businesses remain closed. Economists at Credit Suisse bank are calculating the effects of the disaster on the worst hit areas to cost around $171bn. Japan earthquake and tsunami Japan Nuclear power Natural disasters and extreme weather Tania Branigan Lee Glendinning Richard Adams guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …• New explosion at nuclear plant, fears of leak • Dangerous levels of radiation at Fukushima plant • Government reveals fire in No 4 reactor • Death toll estimated at 10,000 in one prefecture • Read the latest summary of today’s events • Read the Guardian’s latest news story on the explosion 4.40am: Here’s the latest wrap-up on Fukushima from the Kyodo news agency: The government’s Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency said the explosion at the No 2 reactor may have damaged the ”suppression chamber,” a facility connected to the reactor’s container which is designed to cool down radiation steam and lower the pressure in the reactor. It said a sharp decline in the pressure level of the chamber suggests damage. Following the incident, the radiation level near the main gate of the Fukushima No. 1 plant exceeded the legal limit to reach 965.5 micro sievert per hour at 7:00 a.m. and jumped to 8,217 micro sievert at 8:31 a.m., the agency said. The latter amount is more than eight times the 1,000 micro sievert level to which people can safely be exposed in one year. Given that the building housing the reactor has already been damaged by Monday’s hydrogen blast at the neighboring No. 3 reactor, a spread of radiation outside the plant has become a serious threat, experts say. The possibility of a meltdown, in which fuel rods melt and are destroyed, ”cannot be ruled out” as the fuel rods have been damaged, the utility [Tepco] said. 4.31am: My colleague Matt Seaton hears a detail from the BBC’s World Service. 4.14am: The cumulative effects of the earthquake, tsunami and especially the potential nuclear disaster are weighing heavily on the Japanese economy, as would be expected. The Nikkei stock exchange in Tokyo has plunged by more than 12% today, well below the 9,000 level, while trading on the Topix exchange was suspended. The central bank is said to have injected $61bn in liquidity into the financial markets to ensure lending can continue in the worst areas during morning trading, followed by another $35bn later in the day (at least I think that’s right). So far the Nikkei index has lost nearly 20% since the start of the week. 4.02am: Kyodo reports: “Small amounts of radioactive substances detected in Tokyo”. It was from a Tokyo University monitoring post about five hours ago, some half an hour after the explosion in Fukushima. The amounts are still tiny and pose no hazard. Other monitoring posts in central Tokyo detected no changes in background radiation. 3.54am: It’s being reported on Twitter that Sky News, ITN, BBC and CNN are all moving reporters and camera crews away from the Fukushima plant, so don’t expect to see many pictures. 3.39am: The New York Times has a very pessimistic lead on its website right now , suggesting that a Chernobyl-style disaster is on the horizon – “Japan Faces Potential Nuclear Disaster as Radiation Levels Rise” is the headline: Japan’s nuclear crisis verged toward catastrophe on Tuesday, after an explosion at one crippled reactor damaged its crucial steel containment structure and a fire at another reactor spewed large amounts of radioactive material into the air, according to official statements and industry executives informed about the developments. It’s an excellent piece of reporting and well worth reading: The cascade of problems at Daiichi was initially difficult to interpret — with confusion compounded by incomplete and inconsistent information provided by government officials and executives of the plant’s operator, Tokyo Electric Power. But industry executives in close contact with officials in Japan said that the chain of events at Daiichi suggested that the authorities had come close to losing control of the situation, and that it would be difficult to maintain emergency seawater cooling operations at stricken reactors if a fire at a fourth reactor nearby was releasing large amounts of radioactive material — at least without threatening the health of emergency workers onsite. 3.24am: @peterdaou tweets: We can pretend climate change is a hoax, that BP’s spill vanished into thin air, but Japan’s nuclear disaster is a blistering wake-up call. 3.21am: This has now been confirmed by Japan’s nuclear safety agency which says that the fire at the No 4 reactor of the nuclear plant has been extinguished. 3.20am: Kyodo: “Fire at no 4 reactor apparently put out” – TEPCO 3.00am: From TimeOutTokyo, here is a list of the towns which need evacuating: Tamura-ku, Minami Souma Shi, Hirono Machi, Naraha-cho, Tomioka-cho, Ookuma-cho, Futaba-cho, Namie-cho, Katsurao-cho, Iidate Mura, Iwaki Shi (northeast area) 2.52am: To help put that all in context, here is the latest take from AP. (AP) Japan warned of an alarming radiation leak from a stricken nuclear power plant and told people nearby to stay indoors to avoid becoming sick in a rapidly escalating national crisis following last week’s earthquake and tsunami. In a nationally televised statement, Prime Minister Naoto Kan said radiation has spread from the three reactors of the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant in one of the hardest-hit provinces in Friday’s 9.0-magnitude earthquake and the ensuing tsunami. “The level seems very high, and there is still a very high risk of more radiation coming out,” Kan said. He warned there are dangers of more leaks and told people living within 19 miles (30 kilometers) of the Fukushima Dai-ichi complex to stay indoors to avoid radiation sickness. Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano said a fourth reactor at the complex was on fire and more radiation had been released. “Now we are talking about levels that can damage human health. These are readings taken near the area where we believe the releases are happening. Far away, the levels should be lower,” he said. 2.46am: Further information for residents from the expert on NHK. Those in the 20km- 30km zone should get inside, close windows and turn off airconditioning. If they have laundry outside they should leave it outside. If they have been outside they should dust off their hair and clothes before entering their building, including brushing off the soles of their shoes. 2.38am: An expert on NHK is now offering some explanation: “There is a lot of variation in the levels around the different reactors but the highest reading is at a level to harm human health. “We should stress these are the levels mentioned at the facility itself. The highest reading around one of the reactors is 400 milisieverts – the expert says miliSieverts are 1000 times greater than microSieverts. “A very grave situation is happening,” he says. “Even 100 milisieverts would be enough to cause infertility in exposed males; at 500 or more the lymphocytes in the blood will decrease. Clearly the 50 workers who remain will have protective gear. But without it, with that level of exposure, your health could be harmed in a very short time,” he says. The readings taken at 10.20 showed a level of 100 miliSieverts around the unit 4 reactor and 400 around unit 3. 2.25am: More from the question and answer session with Edano: The number 2 reactor is not as stable as number 1 and 3 but the water injection is working “to a certain level” he says. They believe the increases in radiation readings are due to the unit 4 fire, not the problems at unit 2. A bit more on the fire at unit 4: he says that spent fuel will not catch fire, but that they need to extinguish the fire because rising temperatures could cause the release of radioactive material. Asked about people living further away, he says a “minimal amount” of radioactive material could spread to far areas. But he said that would not be at levels that could harm human health. “We want you to keep calm. We can continue with our daily lives,” he said. The press conference has ended now. 2.22am: To clarify, the advice to stay indoors is for those within a 30km radius. 2.15am: As of 10.20am (Japanese time), they have taken readings which indicate levels of radiation that could impact human health. Edano has asked them to “embrace the information calmly”. “The readings were taken near the area where we believe the release of radioactive substances is taking place. The further away you are, the more values should go down.” He says beyond the 20km radius the level should be reduced to one where harm to human health would be minimal or non-existent. But he says that spread will of course depend on wind speeds and direction. He asks people to remain indoors so they are not exposed to any radiation that may come their way. He says he has received a report there is a “very high probability” some portion of the container vessel at the number 2 reactor was damaged. He is now responding to questions. 2.09am: Yukio Edano, the government’s chief spokesman, is now on. He’s saying there’s a fire in the number four unit. There are no fuel rods in there but it still contains spent fuel rods. (The unit was under renovation at the time of the quake and tsunami). He says there seems to have been a hydrogen explosion (as at units 1 and 3) in that unit too. There were not previously thought to be problems with unit 4. The translation is slightly confusing, but the gist seems to be they believe there is a leak of radioactive material from unit 4. More from Edano: The blast from Unit 2 followed the Unit 4 problems. There appears to be a release of steam from number two. This could be hydrogen he says. They are continuing to inject water at units 1 to 3 2.05am: Prime minister Naoto Kan has begun his address to the nation by asking people to listen to his message calmly. According to the translation by broadcaster NHK he warned: “Radiation has spread from these reactors and ‘the reading of the level seems high’. There’s still a very high risk of further radioactive material coming out.” He has asked anyone remaining in the 20km evacuation zone around the number 1 plant and the 10km zone around the number 2 plant to leave. Hundreds of thousands have already been evacuated. He a said workers were “putting themselves in a very dangerous situation” to try to contain the problems. He again requested people to remain calm. 1.55am: The Associated Press now has the latest on the death toll, which has risen to 2,414. (AP) Japanese police say the official death toll from last week’s massive earthquake and tsunami has risen to 2,414. Police said Tuesday that a big share of the deaths were in Miyagi prefecture, where 1,254 people are confirmed dead. The number of people officially missing is at 3,118. But regional officials said they believe that tens of thousands may have been swept away by the tsunami that devastated a long stretch of Japan’s northeastern coast Friday. You can read the Guardian’s latest news piece on the situation here. 1.46am: The nuclear situation in Japan is developing rapidly and we will bring you updates as they come through. A third explosion in four days has hit a struggling nuclear plant in Japan’s stricken north east this morning. The plant’s operators said its reading had climbed to 8,217 microsieverts per hour – described by broadcaster NHK as equivalent to eight times the radiation a person would usually experience in a year. It later dropped sharply, the broadcaster said. The peak was still far below the level which would cause immediate damage to health. 1.37am: Here is a summary of some of the key developments over the last 24 hours in Japan: • A third explosion in four days rocked a crippled nuclear power plant in northeastern Japan on Tuesday morning as authorities struggled to avert a catastrophic release of radiation. The latest explosion at the Fukushima Dai-ichi happened in the plant’s Unit 2 near a suppression pool, which removes heat under a reactor vessel, according to the plant owner, Tokyo Electric Power Co. A government minister said it was “highly likely” that the fuel rods inside the reactor might melt. Radiation levels near the site have risen. • Tens of thousands are still unaccounted for as the official deathtoll reached 2,800, while bodies continue to be washed ashore four days after the tsunami triggered by the earthquake. Almost two million households remain without power in the north of Japan, where snow is forecast later this week, while around 1.4 million households have no running water. Those with power are being affected by rolling blackouts as electricity shortages force reductions in service in some areas. • The International Atomic Energy Agency says the Fukushima crisis is unlikely to become another Chernobyl. Authorities have set up a 20km (12 mile) exclusion zone around the Fukushima Daiichi plant. Meanwhile, the US agreed to Japan’s formal request for supplies and equipment to tackle the crisis. • Japanese stocks took a hammering when the Tokyo Stock Exchange opened on Tuesday and saw its benchmark Nikkei 225 decline to its lowest point since early October 2008. Efforts to limit the financial devastation wreaked by the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear power crisis continued with Japan’s central bank planning to inject $85bn billion into the economy to help the banking system to function as many businesses remain closed. Economists at Credit Suisse bank are calculating the effects of the disaster on the worst hit areas to cost around $171bn. Japan earthquake and tsunami Japan Nuclear power Natural disasters and extreme weather Tania Branigan Lee Glendinning Richard Adams guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Demonstrating the ability to go unhinged without provocation, movie critic Robert Ebert looked at this Hollywood Reporter item discussing CNN's audience increase on Friday as an excuse to tweet the following at about midnight Eastern time last night: As poster “Hollywoodland” at Andrew Breitbart's Big Hollywood pointed out , Ebert's link doesn't even support his claim. Looking at more comprehensive numbers, let's compare Media Bistro's cable news scoreboards for Friday, March 11 to Friday, March 4 . One sees that while CNN's viewership went up astronomically, Fox's viewership also increased quite substantially (all figures presented are March 11 vs. March 4): Total Day, All viewers, CNN — 2.532 million vs. 495,000, up 412% Total Day, 25-54 Demo, CNN — 1.100 million vs. 169,000, up 551% Total Day, All viewers, Fox — 2.273 million vs. 1.381 million, up 97% Total Day, 25-54 Demo, Fox — 724,000 vs. 368,000, up 97% Prime Time, All viewers, CNN — 2.645 million vs. 582,000, up 354% Prime Time, 25-54 Demo, CNN — 1.163 million vs. 242,000, up 381% Prime Time, All viewers, Fox — 2.719 million vs. 2.069 million, up 31% Prime Time, 25-54 Demo, Fox — 754,000 vs. 488,000, up 55% Further contradicting Ebert's claim, MSNBC's numbers compared to the other two cable networks barely budged. Each of MSNBC's four March 4-11 audience
Continue reading …Chicago's WGN on Saturday, during a segment about concerns over tsunami-damaged nuclear facilities in Japan, interviewed David Kraft, the head of the Nuclear Energy Information Service. As the scene shifted to Kraft's office, a sign with a swastika over the X in the word Texas was quite visible above his computer screen (video follows with commentary):
Continue reading …Tax assets up from £2.3bn, due to losses in UK, the US and Spain, some incurred before 2010 Barclays has deferred tax assets of £2.5bn, up from £2.3bn, as a result of losses in the UK, the US and Spain, which will help to reduce its tax bill in the years ahead. According to the bank’s annual report, published after markets shut last night, some £1bn of the tax assets – which the bank can count against tax bills – had been stored up from losses incurred before 2010. The bank, which survived the banking crisis without a direct taxpayer bailout, incurred controversy when it admitted to the Treasury select committee that it paid just £113m of corporation tax in the UK in 2009 – when it made £11.9bn of profits. The bank has never been specific about how its tax bill stayed so low, other than to refer to losses it had incurred previously. In its annual report, the bank highlights “global tax payments” of £6.1bn – £3.1bn of taxes borne by Barclays and £3bn of taxes such as employee income tax. The total corporation tax bill was £1.5bn, but it does not say how much of this was paid in the UK. Instead it said “total tax” paid to the UK exchequer in 2010 was £2.8bn. The exact amount of tax assets that Barclays has in the UK is unclear. UK rules allow the bank to use the losses against future profits indefinitely. Other countries, such as Germany, place restrictions on the time such losses can be carried. The annual report is published a week after Barclays admitted that five of its key bankers had been awarded shares and cash deals of more than £110m. Later this week, bailed-out Royal Bank of Scotland is expected to reveal that more than 300 of its key bankers have an average pay deal of more than £1m. While this might seem high, it is lower than the £2.4m per head average awarded to similar staff at Barclays. The news comes as a report out yesterday said profits by the major banks have doubled during the past year but the groups still face significant challenges going forward. The big five – Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds Banking Group, Royal Bank of Scotland and Standard Chartered – made combined pre-tax statutory profits of £22.2bn in 2010, up from £11.3bn in 2009, according to accountants KPMG. The increase was driven by a dramatic drop in impairment charges across all five banks, with these falling by more than £20bn during the 12 months. There was also a marked increase in the margins on their existing mortgage book at some of the banks. Barclays Tax avoidance Corporate governance Banking Jill Treanor guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Co-creator Brian True-May said ITV crime drama ‘wouldn’t be English village’ if it featured minority groups The producer of one of ITV1′s best-known crime dramas, Midsomer Murders, has been suspended from his job after he suggested in an interview that there was no place in the programme for ethnic minorities and it was the “last bastion of Englishness”. Brian True-May, the co-creator of the show which began on ITV in 1997, said the series “wouldn’t work” if there was any racial diversity portrayed in the sleepy village life of the fictional county of Midsomer. Production company All3Media has suspended True-May while it conducts an inquiry and an ITV spokesman said the broadcaster was “shocked and appalled” by his comments. “We just don’t have ethnic minorities involved. Because it wouldn’t be the English village with them,” True-May said in an interview with the Radio Times. “It just wouldn’t work. Suddenly we might be in Slough … We’re the last bastion of Englishness and I want to keep it that way.” An ITV spokesman said: “We are shocked and appalled at these personal comments by Brian True-May which are absolutely not shared by anyone at ITV. “We are in urgent discussions with All3Media, the producer of Midsomer Murders, who have informed us that they have launched an immediate investigation into the matter and have suspended Mr True-May pending the outcome.” True-May was speaking to the Radio Times in advance of the new series of the drama, which returns to ITV1 next week. Originally based on the books by Caroline Graham, Midsomer Murders has so far featured 251 deaths, 222 of which were murder. The show’s original star, John Nettles, previously best-known for his title role in another long-running crime drama, BBC1′s Bergerac, appeared in the last of his 82 episodes last month. He will be replaced in the leading role by Neil Dudgeon playing John Barnaby, the cousin of Nettles’ original inspector Tom Barnaby. Perhaps anticipating criticism of his comments, True-May admitted: “Maybe I’m not politically correct … I’m trying to make something that appeals to a certain audience, which seems to succeed. And I don’t want to change it.” The race equality thinktank the Runnymede Trust said True-May’s comments were out of date and no longer reflected English society. “Clearly, as a fictional work, the producers of Midsomer Murders are entitled to their flights of fancy, but to claim that the English village is purely white is no longer true and not a fair reflection of our society, particularly to this show’s large international audience,” said the trust’s director Rob Berkeley. “It is not a major surprise that ethnic minority people choose not to watch a show that excludes them.” True-May has also banned swearing, graphic violence and sex scenes from the show, but his idyllic formula does not stop challenging storylines or other elements of diversity which do not involve ethnicity. “If it’s incest, blackmail, lesbianism, homosexuality … terrific, put it in, because people can believe that people can murder for any of those reasons,” he said. Not all of the programme’s cast appeared to agree with the programme’s producer. Actor Jason Hughes, who plays sidekick DS Jones and starred as Warren in BBC2′s This Life, said: “This isn’t an urban drama and it isn’t about multiculturalism. That’s not to say that there isn’t a place for multiculturalism in the show. “But that’s really not up to me to decide. I don’t think that we would all suddenly go, ‘a black gardener in Midsomer? You can’t have that’. I think we’d all go, ‘great, fantastic’.” ITV1 ITV Television Race issues John Plunkett guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Via Truthout, Greg Palast informs us that TEPCO, the Japanese power company, has a long history of safety violations and coverups — and they’re coming to the Gulf of Mexico to build a nuclear power plant! Can this nightmare get any worse? I need to speak to you, not as a reporter, but in my former capacity as lead investigator in several government nuclear plant fraud and racketeering investigations. I don’t know the law in Japan, so I can’t tell you if Tokyo Electric Power Co (TEPCO) can plead insanity to the homicides about to happen. But what will Obama plead? The administration, just months ago, asked Congress to provide a $4 billion loan guarantee for two new nuclear reactors to be built and operated on the Gulf Coast of Texas – by TEPCO and local partners . As if the Gulf hasn’t suffered enough. Here are the facts about TEPCO and the industry you haven’t heard on CNN: The failure of emergency systems at Japan’s nuclear plants comes as no surprise to those of us who have worked in the field. Nuclear plants the world over must be certified for what is called “SQ” or “Seismic Qualification.” That is, the owners swear that all components are designed for the maximum conceivable shaking event, be it from an earthquake or an exploding Christmas card from al-Qaeda. The most inexpensive way to meet your SQ is to lie. The industry does it all the time. The government team I worked with caught them once, in 1988, at the Shoreham plant in New York. Correcting the SQ problem at Shoreham would have cost a cool billion, so engineers were told to change the tests from “failed” to “passed.” The company that put in the false safety report? Stone & Webster, now the nuclear unit of Shaw Construction, which will work with TEPCO to build the Texas plant . Lord help us. There’s more. Last night, I heard CNN reporters repeat the official line that the tsunami disabled the pumps needed to cool the reactors, implying that water unexpectedly got into the diesel generators that run the pumps. These safety backup systems are the “EDGs” in nuke-speak: Emergency Diesel Generators. That they didn’t work in an emergency is like a fire department telling us they couldn’t save a building because “it was on fire.” Sounds too much like anti-nuke propaganda? The Guardian doesn’t have any reassuring news , either: Nuclear experts have thrown doubt on the accuracy of official information issued about the Fukushima nuclear accident, saying that it followed a pattern of secrecy and cover-ups employed in other nuclear accidents. “It’s impossible to get any radiation readings,” said John Large, an independent nuclear engineer who has worked for the UK government and been commissioned to report on the accident for Greenpeace International. “The actions of the Japanese government are completely contrary to their words. They have evacuated 180,000 people but say there is no radiation. They are certain to have readings but we are being told nothing.” He said a radiation release was suspected “but at the moment it is impossible to know. It was the same at Chernobyl, where they said there was a bit of a problem and only later did the full extent emerge.” According to some reports, 17 helicopter crewmen helping in rescue efforts were contaminated with low-level radiation, but Japanese officials declined to comment. The country’s government has previously been accused of covering up nuclear accidents and hampering the development of alternative energy. In a newly released diplomatic cable obtained by WikiLeaks , politician Taro Kono, a high-profile member of Japan’s lower house, tells US diplomats that the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry – the Japanese government department responsible for nuclear energy – has been “covering up nuclear accidents and obscuring the true costs and problems associated with the nuclear industry”. “What we are seeing follows a clear pattern of secrecy and denial,” said Paul Dorfman, co-secretary to the Committee Examining Radiation Risks from Internal Emitters, a UK government advisory committee disbanded in 2004. “The Japanese government has always tended to underplay accidents. At the moment the Japanese claims of safety are not to be believed by anyone. The health effects of what has happened so far are imponderable. The reality is we just do not know. There is profound uncertainty about the impact of the accident.”
Continue reading …She is the legend who has sung in hundreds of Hindi films, worked with Michael Stipe and Robbie Williams, and been immortalised on a UK No 1 record. Rob Fitzpatrick talks to Asha Bhosle ‘ In the old days all the movie songs were recorded right there on set,” remembers Asha Bhosle , the quintessential Bollywood singer. Now 77, Bhosle was just 11 when she performed her first song on a movie soundtrack, Chala Chala Nav Bala from Majha Bal in 1943. In the 68 years since, she has provided the on-screen singing voice for generations of actresses unable to capture and deliver a song as brilliantly as she could, singing around 20,000 tunes in 14 languages, as well as recording with Robbie Williams, Michael Stipe and the Kronos Quartet, and lending her name to Cornershop’s Brimful of Asha, one of the landmark No 1 hits of the 1990s. “My son Anand first heard that song in San Francisco and told me all about it,” she says, via a friend and translator, from Australia where she is appearing in concert. “I was at the immigration counter at Heathrow Airport once and the young officer read the profession listed in my passport as ‘singer’. He was intrigued, so I told him I was the Asha from Brimful of Asha, and he was so excited he left his post and called his friends over to meet me. So I guess, at the very least, that song helped me clear UK immigration faster than usual.” When Bhosle thinks back to the start of her career she remembers dusty movie sets, people running around, lights and cameras. “And there was little me,” she says, “falling asleep and being woken up to sing my part. I think
Continue reading …Coalition considers fines for unreasonable charges as Vince Cable enters visas battle with home secretary The coalition is considering a Soviet-style central intervention policy to effectively fine individual universities if they impose unreasonable tuition fees next year. Vince Cable, the business secretary whose department is responsible for universities, and David Willetts, the universities minister, are looking at allowing colleges that charge a modest fee to expand and constraining those that are charging too much. The government, through the Higher Education Funding Council, sets the grant and numbers for each university and has the power to fine a university as much as £3,000 per student if it over-recruits in a single year. Ministers are looking at cutting funding from universities that unreasonably charge the maximum £9,000 fee from 2012-13. They admit it is likely most universities will charge well over £8,000 a year. One minister said: “A form of dramatic centralisation is under active consideration – a form of Gosplan if you like,” a reference to the Russian state planning committee set up in the 1920s. Ministers had been working with a model in which the average tuition fee was £7,500. If this is exceeded, the upfront cost of loans balloons. At the weekend, the deputy prime minister, Nick Clegg, railed against the possibility of universities charging £9,000 in order to project their prestige. He said: “I cannot think of anything more absurd than a university saying, to prove that they can offer a good education, they can whack up the price to £9,000. They are not Harrods.” Cable admitted he was worried by the number of universities planning to charge £9,000 and he conceded that uncertainty over the coalition’s crackdown on visas for overseas students was encouraging institutions to push up fees as an insurance policy against a potential £2bn annual loss of income. Cable’s department is urgently pressing for a resolution to a dispute with the Home Office. The home secretary, Theresa May, has targeted student visas as a way of fulfilling promises to cut net immigration. The issue may go the cabinet within the next fortnight. The government wants to reduce the number of visas for those wanting to study at courses below degree level and to demand a higher standard of English. But universities argue that many international degree students are recruited from non-degree courses, on which they have improved their English and increased their knowledge. Cable has also been arguing that universities urgently need greater certainty over the future of teacher training and medical training. He said: “One of the reasons universities are talking such big numbers is genuine uncertainty about how they will be funded for teacher training and for medical training and, above all else, how we deal with overseas students who pay the full commercial rate and cross-subsidise British students.” He said he wanted “a good answer” from the Home Office. In the face of this uncertainty, Exeter last week became the first university outside the Russell Group to announce it would charge the maximum fee. It said it needed the extra income to meet higher expectations from students. Exeter followed Cambridge and Imperial College London in confirming plans to treble fees. Ministers have said the maximum fee should only apply in “exceptional circumstances” and universities wishing to charge more than £6,000 would have to do more to widen the participation of disadvantaged students. Ministers privately recognise there is only a slim chance of enough new entrants entering the university market in the short term to drive down fees. In a bid to put pressure on universities to keep fees down, Cable warned: “At some point, a university committee will destroy their own student base unless they are very, very careful. If they pursue an aggressive policy, they could themselves be very badly hurt.” He argued unjustifiably large fees could lead to universities being undercut by further education colleges but admitted the financial uncertainty could lead to some universities going bankrupt. Gareth Thomas, the shadow higher education minister, said: “The government’s headache on university funding is of its own making. If the government had taken time to consult before they increased fees by so much and if they weren’t causing problems in other areas of university finances like overseas student income, they might have been able to avoid some of the difficulties they now find themselves facing. Trebling tuition fees isn’t fair, it wasn’t necessary and, as this demonstrates, it isn’t financially sustainable, either.” Tuition fees Higher education University administration Students Education policy Liberal-Conservative coalition David Willetts Vince Cable Nick Clegg Theresa May Patrick Wintour Allegra Stratton guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …