Prince describes quake aftermath as unbelievable during tour of New Zealand and Australian disaster areas Prince William described the scale of damage caused to Christchurch by last month’s earthquake as “unbelievable” as he visited the city at the start of a tour of parts of New Zealand and Australia that have been struck by disaster in recent months. The prince walked through central Christchurch, which remains inaccessible to the public, to see the impact of the magnitude 6.3 quake which struck on 22 February, killing at least 166 people. “The scale of it is unbelievable. It really does bring it home to you to see a building like that, it’s just so sad,” he said looking at the 26-storey Hotel Grand Chancellor, which remains at a dangerous angle after part of its foundations slumped. The prince had earlier been greeted at the emergency response headquarters by a wall of media before spending almost an hour talking to staff at the repurposed art gallery. One worker in the building said the prince’s visit “definitely lifted spirits”. Morale is low in New Zealand, where people are struggling to cope with the aftermath of two earthquakes in five months. On Wednesday the New Zealand government and the International Rugby Board confirmed that Christchurch would no longer host its seven allotted games in the Rugby World Cup , owing to damage to the stadium and accommodation. The Christchurch mayor, Bob Parker, one of the officials who accompanied William through the city, said the prince appeared to have been strongly affected by what he had seen. “He’s been exposed to some pretty gritty things in his life given his career path,” Parker said. “He’s taken this in his stride. “He’s our prince. He didn’t have to come here but he did and the fact that he did means a great deal to us.” Later in the day, William flew across the South Island to the west coast, to meet the families of the 29 men who died in the Pike River mine explosion . Welcoming him at the Miners’ Hall in Shantytown, near Greymouth, the Grey district mayor, Tony Kokshoorn, said: “We look at you and we know that you, also, have had tragic times in your past.” Bernie Monk, the father of one of the miners killed in November’s explosion and spokesman for the victims’ families, told local radio: “We need these events to keep us going and keep our chins up. It’s just overwhelming and humbling.” The prime minister, John Key, who met Prince William in Shantytown, said the visit was “hugely appreciated by New Zealanders”. He said the inclusion of the Christchurch earthquake appeal on the royal wedding charity gift fund “reflects the couple’s close ties to and affection for New Zealand”. The royal visit was not, however, universally welcomed. Keri Hulme, patron of the Republican Movement of Aotearoa New Zealand, said the tour appeared to be “designed to enhance politicians’ profiles”. The 1984 Booker prizewinner, for her novel The Bone People, told the Guardian in an email that the prince probably meant well. “But he’s here today and gone by Saturday. And in the meantime, and for years and years coming, it’s Aotearoa New Zealanders and their friends who will be the ones slowly rebuilding places.” Writing in the Christchurch Press, Vicki Anderson questioned the timing of Friday’s memorial service, expected to be attended by more than 10,000 people, including Prince William and politicians from New Zealand and Australia, in Christchurch’s Hagley Park. The event, Anderson wrote, amounted to “a grandiose, empty gesture starring so-called VIPs”. For residents, she said, “life is still too raw here for us to have a memorial”. William is due to depart on Saturday for Australia, where he will visit parts of Queensland and Victoria recovering from flooding and cyclones. Prince William New Zealand Australia Natural disasters and extreme weather Monarchy Toby Manhire guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …• Hit F5 to refresh or turn on the automatic widget below • Email your thoughts to rob.smyth@guardian.co.uk • Follow it on the sly with our desktop scoreboard • Click here for full scorecard 16th over: England 97-2 (Trott 38, Bell 7) Here’s Devendra Bishoo, the 25-year-old debutant leggie. He has a stunning List A record (25 wickets at 12.64 from 10 games) and has a biggish shout for LBW second ball. Bell missed a premeditated lap, but the ball turned enough that it would have missed off stump. That’s a nice start from Bishoo, with just three singles from the over. “I’d like to think,” says Ant Pease, “that Tino Best would do well on the subject of the 2004 Great Slump of the West London glazing industry .” 15th over: England 94-2 (Trott 37, Bell 5) Trott pulls out the reverse sweep for Benn’s first delivery, and times it superbly for four. That takes him to 36 from 19 balls. Thirty-six from 19 balls! This is, as the chaps have just said on Sky, a much better pitch than the South Africa one, although I still think there will be plenty for Swann and also some reverse swing. Anything over 250 should be extremely competitive. “My wife did have fun at our wedding (11th over), as it goes,” says Mac Millings. “When the official asked if she took this man, etc., she started laughing, and couldn’t stop. Better than crying, I suppose. Perhaps that was just on the inside.” 14th over: England 87-2 (Trott 32, Bell 4) Three singles from Russell’s over. England are in a cracking position here but they must be careful not to lose too many wickets too soon and end up, say, being all out for 114 in the 19th over. Meanwhile, to my left, James Richardson is talking about Michael Bevan’s peerless dot-ball ratio favourite or most memorable adverts. For some reason, this always comes to mind . 13th over: England 85-2 (Trott 30, Bell 3) Benn is back. One thing that Bell and Trott have done well in the tournament is to ensure a relatively low dot-ball ratio, and that will be important as the spinners get in amongst the innings. They are into the groove straight away with six singles from Benn’s over. Excellent batting. “I love the OBO,” says Kathryn Burgess. “It’s all things to all people. Where else could you find ‘panegyrical monogamy’ and ‘bricking it’ in the same paragraph?” A transcript of Question Time: the Watford edition? 12th over: England 79-2 (Trott 27, Bell 0) Earlier in the over, Trott pinged his sixth boundary from his first nine deliveries. Astonishing. By the end of the over he had slowed down a touch; his strike rate is now a leisurely 225.00. “Specialist subjects,” says Paul Chapman. “Name: Kamran Akmal. Occupation: Wicketkeeper. Specialist Subject: The Catcher in the Rye.” WICKET! England 79-2 (Strauss c Gayle b Russell 31) Having lived by the pull, Andrew Strauss dies by it. That was on him a touch too quickly from Andre Russell, and maybe a touch too high as well, so the ball went up in the air towards midwicket. Chris Gayle stirred from his afternoon nap to lumber after it, and he took a good two-handed catch as he tumbled forward. I thought he was going to drop it, in truth, or fall asleep before he reached it, but he held on well and then rolled over on his back in delight like a little madcap cat. Strauss played well to reach 31 from 39 balls, although England could have done with him staying in for this Powerplay. 11th over: England 73-1 (Strauss 30, Trott 22) When The Wisden Cricketer devoted a big section to cricket’s 50 greatest mavericks a couple of years ago, there was a nice counter-intuitive inclusion of Glenn McGrath. You could put Trott in there for similar reasons. I can’t stop laughing at him, for all the right reasons. He’s a unique phenomenon, and he has moved to – and you’ll like this – 22 from 8 balls! There were consecutive boundaries in that Sammy over, a cut and then a beautiful extra-cover drive. “An OBO of the wedding sounds like fun,” says Robin Hazlehurst, before describing a scenario that, while many things, probably doesn’t qualify as ‘fun’. “Just think of all the slightly sad (and very old) fnarr fnarrish cricket jokes you get in about bowling maidens over and the bride hoping for a tickle between the legs later and so on. Millings would be in his element.” He’d have more fun than his wife did at his wedding. Possibly. 10th over: England 60-1 (Strauss 27, Trott 12) They really should have a drinks break every time Jonathan Trott walks to the wicket, so long do his routines take. When he is finally ready, Russell spears the first ball onto the pads and… well, you know what happens next. Don’t bowl there to Trott; he’s almost as ruthless off his pads as Mark Waugh was back in the day. Trott gets another boundary two balls later, worked economically off the hip behind square, and then another from his fifth delivery, driven through extra cover. Twelve from five balls. What a start! “Luke Wright is trending on Twitter,” says my colleague Matthew Hancock. “Never thought I’d see the day.” That’s priceless. Imagine what will happen when he hits 47 from 18 balls, takes three for 34 and two catches and pulls off a run out in the final. WICKET! England 48-1 (Prior b Russell 21) There that goes. Russell nips a good one through Prior’s gate to knock middle stump out of the ground. It was that mezzanine length, so Prior didn’t know whether to go back or forward. He did neither in the end, and there was just enough seam movement to take the ball between bat and pad and onto the to of off stump. It’s another nothing score for Prior in one-day cricket, but at least he didn’t hang around: 21 from 21 balls represents a decent start for England. 9th over: England 48-0 (Strauss 27, Prior 21) The captain Darren Sammy is going to bowl. “Come on Big Boy,” says Devon Thomas, who clearly doesn’t believe in panegyrical monogamy. His second ball is a touch short, no more, and Strauss picks it up handsomely over midwicket for six. He’s pulling with abandon now that Roach is out of the attack. He took his time to get his eye in – not unlike Mike Atherton in that epic ODI hundred v the West Indies in 1995 – and now he is playing beautifully. Eight from the over. “Mastermind?” sniffs Guy Hornsby. “Isn’t that a bit of a contradiction in terms for OBOers? I bet Graeme Swann would be a great contestant. The mind boggles at what he’d settle on: Oasis’ Discography, The History Newcastle United’s Silverware (arf), Winding Up Pseudo-Yorkshiremen on Social Networks, or how about Being The Best Spinner in the World? I like the sound of the last one. In truth I’m much too nervous to be fully humorous at the moment. In fact, I’m bricking it.” Honk! 8th over: England 40-0 (Strauss 20, Prior 20) Sulieman Benn is replaced by Andre Russell, another hulking fast bowler. Strauss pulls him for two and then drags another pull round the corner for four. After a couple of sighters, England are clearly keen to cash in before this pitch starts to die. Everything dies, even good pitches. “I’d just like to say I’ve really enjoyed this World Cup, shame it’s over so quickly,” says Piers Barclay. “Can we make the group stages longer next time?” Have you been watching Annie Hall ? 7th over: England 33-0 (Strauss 13, Prior 20) That’s a splendid stroke from Strauss, who walks across his stumps and slams Roach through midwicket for four. He has such authority these days. Saying which, Strauss then charges down the track and misses an almighty golf shot. Still, this has been – don’t whisper it, don’t even think it – a good start from England. “KP’s specialist subject,” says Sara Torvalds, “would be getting out to left-arm spin, surely.” 6th over: England 27-0 (Strauss 8, Prior 19) “Bowling Benny Boy, come on Benny,” says Devon Thomas. Even before Benn has bowled a ball. What was that line in Kiss Kiss Bang Bang about mouths and socks? The Sky commentators all concur that the pitch is, for now at least, a belter. But there is already turn for Benn and this looks like a seriously good toss to win. Prior is looking in decent touch and times some filth from Benn through midwicket for four. He has 19 from 18 balls. “An OBO on the Royal Wedding?” sniffs Hannah Finch. “Oh please – that would great. I actually might tune in to that – hoping to spend the day in the middle of nowhere with no access to any forms of communication. But for OBO of the wedding, I will make an exception!” You and ones of others. 5th over: England 18-0 (Strauss 7, Prior 11) Full and wide from Roach – don’t bowl there, son – and Strauss spanks him gloriously through extra cover for four. There has been no sideways movement yet, so the drive looks a fairly safe shot. “Are you surprised they chose to bet?” Freudians Chris Wright. “England are so much better at chasing than setting a total.” They are, but this is definitely a bat-first pitch. They will want the sun to bake it this afternoon for the spinners. I don’t think dew will be much of an issue today; although, I must confess, Chennai dew is not my Mastermind specialist subject. I wonder what Ian Bell’s Mastermind subject would be, or Paul Nixon’s, or Ian Austin’s, or any other England cricketer’s. Any ideas? 4th over: England 14-0 (Strauss 3, Prior 11) Devon Thomas is the chattiest wicketkeeper I can recall – he makes Ian Healy seem like Mr Bean – and to my chagrin persists in calling Sulieman Benn “Big Boy”. It must be off putting for the boSHUT UP MANwler, never mind the batsDIGNITY, DIGNITYmen. Strauss sweeps for a single and then Prior rocks back to cut expertly for four. He split the field beautifully there. A similar shot brings two more off the final delivery, and Prior looks in decent t[that'll do - ed]. 3rd over: England 7-0 (Strauss 2, Prior 5) Strauss mis-pulls Roach just over Devon Smith, running back from midwicket. That’s a dangerous shot against Roach, given the bounce. It’s one of three singles from the over, so the cautious start continues. Roach is bowling well here. “Now that Jonathan Agnew is set to commentate from Whitehall on the Royal Wedding,” begins Keith Flett, “I await news of plans for OBO to cover the event, with a carriage by carriage summary of events.” They did let one of us cover the Budget once. We weren’t asked back. 2nd over: England 4-0 (Strauss 0, Prior 4) The new ball will be shared by the left-arm spinner Sulieman Benn. Prior gets England’s first runs from the 10th delivery of the match, driving nicely through extra cover for four. Those are the only runs from the over. England have started watchfully and I think that is sensible, not least because they lost two wickets in the first over against South Africa on this ground. “I recall the name Tredwell but have no frame of reference,” says Luciano Howard. “I agree a slightly mad selection helps up the crazy-who-knows-what-the-heck’s-gonna-happen barometer alongside Maverick and the positively Ice Man seeming Windies (cf England these days) but why, specifically (and obviously Tremlett in is clearly good).” Well they need two spinners for this pitch, and Tredwell is a better bowler than Yardy. England have made a Horlicks of the batting Powerplay, but Wright can be deadly if he comes off. You want him coming in after around 43 overs; no earlier than that. He’s not so good at building an innings – he looks like he doesn’t know whether to stick, twist or ask for his mummy – but he can hit 40 off 20 balls at the death, which is just what England have lacked. And Tremlett comes in for Anderson because of a) the bounce and b) the fact that Anderson is exhausted mentally. 1st over: England 0-0 (Strauss 0, Prior 0) Kemar Roach’s first two deliveries bounce appreciably on their way through to Devon Thomas, which will interest Chris Tremlett, nor to mention Kemar Roach. It’s hard to know what a par score is, but it certainly isn’t 300, so England can afford a few overs to get a sense of what the pitch is like. Strauss does just that, leaving four of the first six deliveries from Roach. It’s a maiden. It’s a boiling hot day in Chennai , so an already bare pitch should wear some more by the time Graeme Swann gets to work. He is going to win this for England. My waters have told me. Impartiality department Come on England! The teams England Strauss (c), Prior (wk), Trott, Bell, Morgan, Bopara, Wright, Bresnan, Swann, Tredwell, Tremlett. West Indies Gayle, Smith, Darren Bravo, Sarwan, Pollard, Thomas (wk), Sammy, Russell, Benn, Bishoo, Roach. England have won the toss and will bat first. The England team? You’ll like this one: Luke Wright and James Tredwell are both playing! In other news, Shergar and Lord Lucan also start. So Tredwell is in for the injured Ajmal Shahzad – who, and stop me if you think you’ve etc, is injured and will miss the rest of the rest tournament – Wright replaces Paul Collingwood (who just may have played his last game for England), and Chris Tremlett replaces James Anderson. That’s a fascinating and unusually eccentric selection from Andy Flower and Andrew Strauss, a ‘sod it, what’s the worst that can happen’ gesture from two men who usually deal in the cold and the rational. The boys in the Sky studio are being very critical, but I quite like this XI. West Indies have surprisingly omitted Shivnarine Chanderpaul, with Chris Gayle returning. Their batting line up is fairly short by their standards, with the wicketkeeper Devon Thomas at No6. They have also picked a second frontline spinner, with the legspinner Devendra Bishoo replacing Nikita Miller. It’s Bishoo’s debut. A debutant legspinner, eh? Where’s Kevin Pietersen when you need him. That said, this is the pitch on which England beat South Africa and, although it looks a little better 10 days on, that did turn square. So it’s reasonable to expect plenty of help for the spinners. Have-you-gone-mad department Four games, 16 days. Win them all and England will almost certainly be world champions. Cornered Lions 2011 : you heard it here last. Okay, okay , so only Nos 1 and 2 apply. And although the film Go warns us of the perils of asking for favours, we can surely expect either South Africa to beat Bangladesh or India to beat the West Indies. If both were to lose it would be as improbable an occurrence as, oooh, a previously unstoppable South African side losing to Zimbabwe in 1999. (Which, for newbies, is precisely what happened – a result that put England out in the group stages but also, in a surreal twist of fate, put South Africa out of the tournament three weeks later.) Trust us, if England win today they will go through. Or your serotonin back. The permutations To qualify for the quarter-finals, England need the following to happen. 1. They beat the West Indies today 2. South Africa beat Bangladesh on Saturday or India beat West Indies on Sunday. 3. They get four or more lottery numbers. 4. The moon is aligned at an officially jaunty angle in relation to the earth. 5. Thom Yorke and Bob Willis smile simultaneously. 6. Mac Millings looks someone in the eye. 7. I inexplicably pepper the OBO with ludicrous phrases like ‘to die for’ and ‘ j’adore ‘ 8. Everyone else on the Guardian sports desk turns out today in a string vest and a sarong. It’s No1 that I’m really worried about. Preamble Once more upon the altar of pain, dear friends, once more. After three weeks in which their performances have fluctuated so wildly as to make Messrs Sublime and Ridiculous seem like siblings, England’s World Cup campaign may have reached the end of the line. If they lose to the West Indies in Chennai today, they will finally go home after the longest and most memorable winter of them all. The Ashes is the main part of 2010-11, of course – and you can celebrate it by buying 766 and All That , the Guardian Ashes book, for the reasonable price of £7.99, less than a pint of Foster’s shandy in some West End bars, from all good online book stores – but we’ll also remember their part in this World Cup for as long as we can say ‘ I know a century off 50 balls is pretty slow by today’s standards, kid, but in those days… ‘. It’s been a madcap romp that has redefined the phrase ‘Kwik Cricket’ (take a picture of your nails now, and then in eight hours’ time). If England lose today this will be, statistically speaking, their worst-ever World Cup performance (they have never before failed to reach the last eight), yet we will remember it with so much more fondness than 1996, 1999, 2003 and 2007. It’s been full of warped joy, old-school misery and big dumb fun. Actually, fun might be pushing it, as anyone currently getting flashbacks to Shafiul Islam’s innings the other day will confirm. Yet it has been a very moreish kind of pain. By rights we should be begging for mercy; instead we’re begging for more. Just like this little cutie . After four consecutive coronary-inducers – five if you’re a completist and want to take in the Netherlands game – we’ll feel short-changed if today’s match isn’t decided by a Spandex-tight run-out referral off the last delivery. A tight finish is probably the only thing we should try to predict. The result is best left alone. Hindsight tells us that it has been safe to expect the unexpected from England at this tournament, but a) nobody knows what the unexpected is with the West Indies, who are mavericks themselves; any student of maverick behaviour knows that, when two mavericks meet, all bets are off; and, more importantly, b) if the unexpected becomes the norm then isn’t that now the expected so doesn’t that mean we should expect what used to be the expected and I’m confused now and my head hurts and is it the expected or the unexpected and is everything the wrong way round or not and WHY DO I KEEP SCRAWLING REDRUM EVERYWHERE I GO! Just assume the position behind the sofa and see what happens. It’s best that way. Cricket World Cup 2011 England cricket team West Indies Cricket Team Cricket Over by over reports Rob Smyth guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …The use of military helicopters to drop seawater onto the plant’s No 3 reactor marked the opening of a new front in the battle to avert nuclear meltdown Attempts to cool down a stricken reactor at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant suffered an early setback on Thursday after seawater dumped from the air failed to bring down radiation levels. Radiation readings taken 20 minutes after self-defence force helicopters doused the plant’s No 3 reactor remained unchanged, Tokyo Electric Power [Tepco] said, according to Kyodo news agcncy. The use of Japanese military helicopters to drop seawater onto the plant’s reactor marked the opening of a new front in the battle to avert nuclear meltdown. TV footage showed the CH-47 Chinook helicopters dousing the No 3 reactor in an attempt to cool an overheating pool for spent fuel rods and prevent it from releasing dangerous radioactive steam. Two helicopters, flying at less than 300 feet, dumped four loads of water on the reactor, although the footage suggested a significant quantity was missing the target. The ministry said it planned to release at least 12 more loads in the 40 minutes that each crew can remain in the area before experiencing limited radiation exposure. The aim of the operation is twofold: to cool the reactor and replenish a pool containing spent fuel rods. Although Tepco has been unable to take precise measurements, the pool is thought to be almost empty of water, raising the risk that the fuel rods will overheat and melt. Earlier, Gregory Jackzo, chairman of the US nuclear regulatory commission told a congressional hearing in Washington that the storage pool at another reactor had lost all of its water and was in danger of spewing more radioactive material. “We are afraid that the water level at [the No 4 reactor] is the lowest,” said Hikaru Kuroda, a Tepco official. But he added, “Because we cannot get near it, the only way to monitor the situation is visually from far away.” At lunchtime on Thursday the police stood ready to spray the No 3 reactor from 11 water cannon trucks, as the focus of the crisis shifted from overheating reactors to the potentially more dangerous predicament of the storage pools. The roofs of the No 3 and No 4 reactors were blown away by hydrogen explosions earlier this week, depriving them of a last line of defence against potentially dangerous radiation leaks. In the worst-case scenario, overheating fuel rods could heat up to the point where they begin to melt and release high levels of radioactivity. Tepco said it was attempting to open a temporary power line to the plant, 150 miles north of Tokyo, which would allow it to pump water directly into the storage pools and reactor cores. Japan’s nuclear safety agency said it hoped the power supply would be partially operational on Thursday afternoon. “Once we establish the temporary power supply we will be able to pump seawater into the reactors,” a Tepco spokesman said. “We believe the operation will help cool down the fuel pools,” the defence minister, Toshimi Kitazawa told reporters. “Ideally we want to repeat the exercise as many times as possible, but we also have to consider the health risks to our troops.” Each helicopter is capable of carrying 7.5 tonnes of water at a time, but the pools each hold 2,000 tonnes, an expert told public broadcaster NHK. But he added: “It will be possible as long as the rods are fully submerged. That means the storage pool would need to be about a third full. But the dousing has to be done repeatedly.” About 70,000 people have been evacuated from a 20-kilomtre radius around Fukushima Daiichi, and another 140,000 living within a 20 to 30 kilometre radius ordered to stay indoors. Japan’s top spokesman, Yukio Edano, said there was no need to widen the exclusion zone, but signs are emerging that other countries are taking a more cautious approach. The worsening situation prompted the US to ask citizens living within an 80-kilomtre radius to evacuate. ”We are recommending, as a precaution, that American citizens who live within 50 miles (80 kilometres) of the Fukushima nuclear power plant evacuate the area or to take shelter indoors if safe evacuation is not practical,” the US embassy said in a statement. The British embassy has since issued similar advice, and asked citizens living in Tokyo and northern Japan to consider leaving. Elevated – though not hazardous – levels of radiation have been detected well outside the Fukushima evacuation zone. In Ibaraki prefecture to the south, officials said radiation levels were about 300 times normal levels by late Wednesday morning. It would take three years of constant exposure to these higher levels to raise a person’s risk of cancer. Japan earthquake and tsunami Japan Nuclear power Natural disasters and extreme weather Justin McCurry guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Diane Sawyer allocated all but 1:37 of World News to Japan on Wednesday night, committing 33 seconds of that limited time to touting President Obama’s NCAA basketball picks provided to ABC corporate cousin ESPN. “Despite all the troubles around the world” Sawyer rationalized – as if there’s much evidence Obama, who’s hardly been engaged in the Libyan or Japanese situations and who went golfing last weekend, is devoting much time to any of it – “the President kept his annual appointment to fill out his bracket for college basketball's March Madness. The basketball Fan-in-Chief got together with our sister network ESPN's Andy Katz.” Following a clip of Obama revealing a couple of his selections, Sawyer trumpeted: “You heard it here first. The President is going with Kansas!” Then, with “BARACK-ETOLOGY” at the top of the screen above ESPN graphics, Sawyer plugged: “And you can see all of his picks on ESPN’s Sports Center and at ESPN.com.” A year ago , Sawyer devoted nearly two minutes of World News (1:50) to Obama's college basketball tournament choices. She teased at the start of the March 17, 2010 newscast: ‘Top picks: Stream of consciousness as the Fan-in-Chief completes his college basketball bracket.’” From the Wednesday, March 16 ABC World News: DIANE SAWYER: And, despite all the troubles around the world, the President kept his annual appointment to fill out his bracket for college basketball's March Madness. The basketball Fan-in-Chief got together with our sister network ESPN's Andy Katz. ANDY KATZ: All right, so Kansas versus Pittsburgh semifinal, who wins? PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA CLIP #1: That's Kansas.
Continue reading …Saeeda Khan withheld payment from Mwanahamisi Mruke, fed her two slices of bread a day and made her sleep on floor A former hospital director has been convicted of trafficking a woman from Tanzania to Britain and using her as a “slave”, in the first case of its kind to come before a court. Southwark crown court heard that Mwanahamisi Mruke, 47, was brought to the UK by Saeeda Khan with the promise of a domestic service visa and 120,000 Tanzanian shillings a month (£50). There was also £10 a month pocket money. Desperate to fund her daughter Zakia’s college education, Mruke agreed. But when she arrived in Britain in October 2006, Mruke was forced by Khan to work around the clock and sleep on the kitchen floor of her home in Harrow, London, for the next three years. Mruke was fed just two slices of bread a day, and ordered around by a bell, which her captor kept in her bedroom. Although the payment arrangements were initially honoured, Khan stopped paying Mruke after one year. She was also prohibited from leaving the house, her passport was taken away, and Khan made threats about Mruke’s relatives in Tanzania. Yesterday the jury at Southwark crown court found Khan guilty of trafficking a person into the UK for exploitation. She was sentenced to nine months in prison, suspended for two years, and ordered to pay £15,000 towards police and prosecution costs, plus £25,000 compensation to Mruke. Judge Geoffrey Rivlin QC said Khan had told “a pack of lies” during the trial. “Your behaviour was callous and greedy,” he said. During the trial, the jury was told that Mruke was forced to work between 6am and midnight each day. She was also woken during the night to take Khan’s son for a walk and never received a day off. When Mruke asked to go home after the deaths of her parents, and for her daughter’s wedding, Khan refused. It was only in February 2010, when Mruke visited her local doctor with an interpreter, Rhoda Mwanga, that concerns were raised about her living conditions. Mwanga contacted the charity Kalayaan, which seeks justice for migrant domestic workers, who alerted the police. Ten days later police officers, accompanied by Mwanga and Kalayaan workers, visited Khan’s home and rescued Mruke. Khan, a widow, was arrested and later charged. Speaking after she was convicted, Mruke said she would “never forgive” the person who had imprisoned her. “I felt like a fool, I was treated like a slave,” she said. “Even the money I was promised, I was never paid. I feel terrible about this. ” Mruke said she had been hoped to “improve my life” in Britain. But her hopes had been “dashed, my strength was reduced and I became unwell.” She is now pursuing a civil claim against Khan. Crime Slavery Police Tanzania Amy Fallon guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …EU expert says Fukushima is out of control as UK and France advise their citizens to leave Tokyo because of radiation fears International concern that Japan has lost control over the nuclear crisis is escalating as Britain, France and other countries advised their citizens to “consider” leaving Tokyo because of heightened radiation levels. Yukiya Amano, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said he would visit the Japanese capital to gather information about the “very serious” situation at the Fukushima plant. Conflicting reports from the damaged nuclear plant have deepened alarm over Japan’s management of the crisis, leading to charges that the authorities are actually making the situation worse. Gregory Jaczko, who heads the US nuclear regulator, said Japan had failed to order a big enough evacuation. He told Congress the public should get at least 50 miles away from the stricken plant. The Japanese cleared a radius of 12 miles. He raised further fears by saying that all the water had evaporated from one of the spent fuel pools at the nuclear plant, so there was nothing to stop the fuel rods from getting hotter. Jaczko said officials believe radiation levels are extremely high, which could affect workers’ ability to stop temperatures rising. The EU’s energy chief, Günther Oettinger, told the European parliament the situation was out of control. “We are somewhere between a disaster and a major disaster,” he said. “There could be further catastrophic events, which could pose a threat to the lives of people on the island.” He said it was impossible to “exclude the worst”, adding: “There is talk of an apocalypse and I think the word is particularly well chosen.” The partial meltdown at Fukushima appeared more serious than the Three Mile Island accident in 1979, the US energy secretary, Steven Chu, told Congress. China, which had been driving a global revival of the nuclear industry, announced it was putting construction on hold, and ordered safety reviews at existing facilities. The heightened concerns – six days after a devastating earthquake and tsunami plunged Japan into a humanitarian as well as a nuclear emergency – brought criticism of the authorities’ management of the situation at Fukushima. Yuli Andreyev, former head of the agency tasked with cleaning up after Chernobyl, told the Guardian the Japanese had failed to grasp the scale of the disaster. He also said the authorities had to be willing to sacrifice nuclear response workers for the good of the greater public, and should not only be deploying a skeleton staff. “They don’t know what to do,” he said. “The personnel have been removed and those that remain are stretched.” Kenneth Bergeron, a physicist who has done research on nuclear accident simulation, said Three Mile Island had shown the importance of bringing in outside experts. “I am concerned that the management of this accident was left to very local hands for a very long time,” he said. “Sometimes the managers and operators in place when the accident has taken place are not well qualified. They may have the inability to see the big picture.” He criticised the rescue effort for not immediately working to restore the power to the reactors’ cooling systems. “What was really needed at Fukushima was restoration of the AC power to the emergency cooling system, and instead we saw them running fire hoses from the ocean. A jerry-rigged arrangement like that sounds to me like a move of real desperation.” The Japanese did not assemble a dedicated crisis management team until Monday morning, Bergeron said. “You need a different kind of person and a different kind of training, and I didn’t see any evidence of that until it was very late.” The decision to evacuate personnel when radiation levels spiked also attracted criticism. Arjun Makhijani, president of the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research, said: “How long can 50 workers last in trying to manage a disaster in four reactors?” However, as Chu told Congress: “If workers have to be permanently evacuated from the site it is unclear if the damage can be effectively contained.” The slow and limited information from the plant’s operator, the Tokyo Electric Power Company, also came under attack. Japan’s prime minister, Naoto Kan, erupted in front of reporters at the company’s lack of transparency. Jim Riccio of Greenpeace said: “I can understand why they would not want to cause panic in the population. But in a disaster of this magnitude timely and accurate information is of the utmost importance.” Andreyev accused Japan’s regulators of sacrificing safety for profits. “Producers always try to hide the danger. After Chernobyl happened, they also tried to hide it.” Viewpoint, page 33 Factory shutdowns, page 35 Japan earthquake and tsunami Natural disasters and extreme weather Japan International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Suzanne Goldenberg Miriam Elder guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …A few months ago I wrote a post about a project I was very excited about: an effort I hoped would help bring transparency, efficiency and a “greening,” for lack of a better word, to city governments in the United States and around the world. Here is how I described this project, and my role in its promotion, and why I thought mayors and city councils of cities large and small should apply: So I am pleased to be consulting with IBM to help urban-dwellers benefit from their Smarter Cities Challenge, which is a project through which IBM will grant $50 million in technology & consulting services to 100 cities around the world–50 of which will be in North America. From finding ways to use technology to improve municipal services to using innovation to ease congestion, this program could be a boon to many urban centers looking for the resources to improve the quality of living and attract business as well as residents. Many who are familiar with my writing know me to be very critical of corporations when I think they’re acting greedily and selfishly. But I also believe very strongly in supporting efforts when I think they’ll provide benefits to those of us not in the top 1% of income earners. I very much see this as one of the latter. In that spirit, this past week The Smarter Cities Challenge announced the winners of this contest, urban centers that span the globe from Bucharest, Romania to Boulder, Colorado, and Townsville, Austria to Tshwane-Pretoria, South Africa. Some exciting projects are on the horizon here in the U.S., especially in regard to such important environmental-impact issues as water & land use. For example, in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Mayor and progressive champion Tom Barrett, has asked IBM to prepare recommendations on how to convert abandoned factories and buildings into urban aqua-cultural assets, which in the short term promise to provide opportunity for civic engagement, and in the longer term viable economic development. Meanwhile, in Providence, Rhode Island, a major construction project – to move Interstate 1-95 out of the center of downtown – is opening up 19.5 acres of newly-developable urban land, and will create a potential opportunity to bring data analytics to bear on the challenge of land use policy. Finally, Mayor Stephanie Miner and the City of Syracuse are using technology to try and find out all the differing factors that lead to a substantial increase in home & building vacancies and the eventual blight and crime that follow. They are looking to systems dynamics and predictive modeling capabilities to solve these important urban issues. I am an urban kid through and through, and cities play such a central role in the culture of not only this country, but all those in which I have been lucky enough to dwell or visit. So I will admit it, I am excited to see these projects play out, and participate in hopefully creating greener, safer and more transparently governed cities. Onto the 21st Century, and hopefully, “smarter” cities. Follow me on Twitter: @cliffschecter
Continue reading …Official figures show £940m cuts will target teaching colleges All but five universities in England are to have their funding cut next year, according to official figures, which show that newer universities focused on teaching will be worst affected. A total of £940m is being cut from the budget for teaching, research and buildings for the next academic year, a 12.6% reduction. Universities that can offset teaching losses with their research income emerge most unscathed, as the teaching grant is reduced by 8.2%, compared with 2.8% shaved from the research budget. There will also be a 58.1% cut in cash terms in funding for buildings. Figures published on Thursday by the Higher Education Funding Council for England (Hefce) show that just five universities will see a rise in cash terms in their grant.With inflation of 2.4%, only one institution sees a real-terms rise in income: the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, where the teaching grant of £3.2m is dwarfed by £17.7m funding for research. Among the 20 least affected universities, seven are members of the research-intensive Russell group: Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, University College London, Imperial, Warwick and Manchester. None of the Russell group universities feature among the 20 worst affected. The 10 institutions where cuts are deepest include Bishop Grosseteste University College in Lincoln, which focuses on degrees relating to education. It will have a 13.4% cut in cash terms. City University, the next hardest hit, will have an 8.4% cut, while the University for the Creative Arts will have a 7.8% cut, and London Metropolitan University will see its budget reduced by 7.6%. The Hefce chief executive, Sir Alan Langlands, said: “Universities that don’t lose out so much are those that benefit from the very modest nature of the cut in research funding, as opposed to the more significant cut in teaching funding.” The universities with least change to their funding are those with high levels of world-leading research, Langlands said, and those with good incomes from business and charities, which often fund scientific research. Further education colleges that teach degree courses are also facing cuts, in some cases by as much as a fifth of their income for higher education. In coming years, universities will expect to get an increasing proportion of their funding from tuition fees. Durham is the latest to announce it will charge £9,000, the maximum allowed, from next year. Les Ebdon, chair of the university thinktank million+ and vice-chancellor of the University of Bedfordshire, criticised the combination of teaching cuts and a freezing of student numbers next year. “The net result is that the wealthiest universities with the most socially exclusive profiles will retain more public funding, while universities which create the most opportunities will receive less funding,” he said. “If there was ever a year when the government needed to be bold and invest in higher education to keep fees down in 2012, this was it. Instead, students and universities are being left to pick up the tab.” Universities have begun preparing for a more spartan public funding environment, cutting back on less successful courses, seeking redundancies and forging closer links with business. David Latchman, master of Birkbeck College, part of the University of London, said he expected to see further growth in the school of business and in courses related to improving job skills, such as arts management. Birkbeck’s strategy will include encouraging firms to subsidise their employees to study part-time and recruiting more foreign students. It will debate a three-tier system of variable fees. “Law can bear a higher fee than English,” Latchman said. Leicester University has shielded itself from the loss in government income through successful philanthropy; commercial activities, including hosting conferences; and raising fees for postgraduate students, as well as cutting costs. Its vice-chancellor, Bob Burgess, said: “A dynamic university will hold its nerve during this period, which is a period of transition. It’s very important to maintain and develop as well as thinking about how you manage cost-cutting exercises.” David Willetts, universities minister, said changes to funding meant more cash would follow student choices through the payment of tuition fees. “These changes will support a more diverse sector, where the choices of informed students provide a drive towards high quality teaching and efficient use of resources,” he said. Gareth Thomas, Labour’s higher education spokesman, said: “At a time when all our major rivals are investing heavily in universities to drive economic growth, cutting by so much the engine room of innovation in our economy seems even more illogical.” A total of £6.5bn is being distributed to universities for the next academic year. The budget cut includes £255m of short-term funding, which was given by the last government to help institutions prepare for spending cuts. If this short-term funding is excluded, the reduction compared with the budget for the current academic year is £685m, or 9.5%. Meanwhile, European students could be charged to come to Scottish universities under proposals to keep higher education free for all Scottish residents. The new measures, coupled with much higher charges for English students, are designed to fend off increasing demands for the Scottish government to drop its long-standing opposition to making Scottish students pay a graduate tax to help increase income for universities. University funding Higher education Tuition fees Students Spending review 2010 Tax and spending Jeevan Vasagar Severin Carrell guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Internal report finds some staff are under-performing and thousands are paid salary top-up for which they do not qualify The BBC is wasting nearly £80m a year through poor management of under-performing staff and erroneously paying a salary top-up to thousands of employees who do not qualify for it, an internal report has concluded. The leaked study by the BBC’s People department identified a range of savings that could be made as part of BBC director general Mark Thompson’s bid to slash £400m from budgets in the wake of last year’s licence fee freeze . More than 1,000 job cuts have already been announced by the BBC from the World Service and its online operation, and several thousand more are expected as part of the cost cutting in the coming years. Poorly performing staff were costing the corporation more than £50m a year, according to the report, which recommended the introduction of a new management appraisal system based on conversations rather than paperwork. The report categorised 910 staff – about 5% of the BBC’s total workforce – as “poor performers” and said fewer than half of nearly 3,000 employees in the BBC Vision division, which spans all of the BBC’s TV channels, were given a regular appraisal. Other issues identified in the report include £28m in “unpredictability allowances” paid annually to BBC staff who did not work unpredictable hours. The total cost of the unpredictability allowance scheme of £33m a year made up more than 3% of the corporation’s annual wage bill of about £1bn. The study was put together by the People department as part of the BBC’s “Delivering Quality First” initiative in which staff are invited to put forward their ideas on cost savings and how the corporation can provide the best quality programmes for its audience. BBC executives are looking at every area of the organisation to see where it can cut costs, including the possibility of abandoning its coverage of the Wimbledon tennis championships and Formula One motor racing . The BBC is also investigating axing the majority of its local radio output , merging much of the stations’ output with national news and sport station, BBC Radio 5 Live. A BBC spokesperson said: “No decisions have been made so it would be wrong to speculate. It is of course only right that BBC staff have an opportunity to input ideas about shaping the BBC’s future. “These sessions are designed to provoke discussion amongst staff about the way the BBC works and any decisions coming out of the DQF process would be subject to public consultation by the BBC Trust.” The People department report also suggested a big discrepancy in pay between different parts of the corporation. Staff between pay grades seven and nine in BBC Vision earned an average of £40,436, 10% more than the typical pay for people on the same pay grades in the BBC News department, who earned an average of £36,464. Staff at equivalent pay grades in the corporation’s operations department, responsible for strategy, property and legal affairs, earned an average of £46,916. The document is understood to have recommended a more flexible BBC workforce with more people on short-term contracts, fewer long-term “lifers” and less generous redundancy terms. “People don’t leave the BBC, they leave line managers,” said the report. “50% of the organisation has a turnover of just 3%. Some areas have even less. When considering the employee deal, it’s more productive to start from identifying what it’s not. It’s not a job for life, a gold-plated pension [or] a paternalistic institution (any more).” •
Continue reading …Click here to view this media During the debate over the continuing resolution that the House passed today, Rep. Marcy Kaptur asked when we’re going to get some of that shared sacrifice from Wall Street and the oil company executives instead of balancing the budget off of the backs of the working class. Here’s more from TPM with the latest on the CR — House Passes Stopgap Spending Measure : The House of Representatives just passed stopgap legislation to prevent the government from shutting down when funds expire on Friday by vote of 271-158. The spending measure, known as a “continuing resolution,” will keep the federal lights on for three weeks, while congressional leaders and the White House hammer out a compromise package that can pass both the House and the Senate. This continuing resolution lost nearly 70 votes compared to the last stopgap, and could not have passed without Democratic support. House conservatives staged a mini-rebellion over the CR, which they say doesn’t sufficiently slash discretionary spending, and doesn’t contain key Republican policy measures — including abortion restrictions and a rescission of funds to implement the health care law. Overall, 54 Republicans broke ranks with GOP leadership and voted against the measure. A total of 85 Democrats voted for the measure. It is expected to pass the Senate late this week.
Continue reading …