Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 1601)
Dear Jeremy: share your advice

• I’m paid less than a new starter I am training • How can I distance myself from a nuisance client? At the start of each week, we publish the problems that will feature in this Saturday’s Dear Jeremy advice column in the Guardian Work supplement, so readers can offer their own advice and suggestions. We then print the best of your comments alongside Jeremy’s own insights. Here are this week’s dilemmas – what are your thoughts? Problem one: I’m paid less than a new starter I am training I have been in my job for about three years, for a company that is currently making a profit.

Continue reading …
When is a price rise chicken feed?

The prices of chicken feed and chicken are increasing, but the sums don’t seem to add up. Felicity Lawrence investigates If you buy free range chicken at Sainsbury’s you may have noticed a price rise recently. Up from around £4.19 a kilo in December for a whole bird to £4.75 a kilo this week, according to the farmers who produce them and monitor retail prices. Chickens are fed on grain and the price has been rocketing, so no surprise that they suddenly cost more – rather a lot more, in fact, with that 14% hike which works out at roughly 87p more for an average size bird. But now here’s a mystery. The farmers who actually produce the chickens say they have had a cut in how much they are paid imposed on them retrospectively. They say that in February the large processor that supplies Sainsbury’s with free range birds, 2 Sisters Food Group (which pays the feed costs) told them that it was paying them 6p per bird less for chickens that they began farming in mid-December and which have already been sold to customers in the shops. The company also insisted that this new lower rate is what they will be paid from now on. The farmers calculate that the commodity price spikes translate into an increase in the cost of feed to the processing company of 27p per bird. They say too that they have been told by Sainsbury that the supermarket has already increased what it pays to the processor to take into account its rising feed costs. So what’s going on? And if costs are up by around 27p per bird why are consumers being charged an extra 87p per bird? I asked 2 Sisters for their version of this price war: “Rising commodity prices have created challenges through all parts of the protein supply chain. In addressing these challenges we have sought some temporary support from all our partners and growers. We have received this support in the vast majority of cases and we will address any outstanding issues through continued dialogue,” its spokesman Peter King told me. It declined to discuss any terms between it and the retailers it. Retail margins are commercially sensitive and Sainsbury simply said: “We know that current high feed prices are putting pressure on farmers’ costs of production, which is why we’ve increased the price we pay to our poultry suppliers. We remain committed to offering our customers the best quality food at competitive prices in this challenging economic climate.” The farmers involved are a cooperative of 47 poultry producers in the West Country and three of the group have now lodged claims in court to try to get back the money they say they are owed by 2 Sisters. “This is an illegal retrospective breaking of contractual commitments on payments for birds already shipped to supermarkets and purchased by customers,” their chairman Bob Shipley said. Their real fear is that what 2 Sisters calls “temporary support” farming families may end up having to call bankruptcy. Food & drink Food Felicity Lawrence guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Recession threatens trouble at mills

After escaping demolition in the 1980s, Victorian textile mills are once again facing an uncertain future, say conservationists The cathedrals of the north, with their evocative roll call of names such as Black Dyke, Titanic and Goitside, are at risk again from recession, according to conservationists and historians. The economic squeeze is reviving fears last allayed two decades ago that the UK’s heritage of Victorian textile mills is under renewed threat from the ball-and-chain and bulldozer. Success stories such as Saltaire near Bradford, one of the country’s biggest buildings which is now a world heritage site ranking beside Stonehenge, disguise a wider, much bleaker picture. A report highlights more than 50 architecturally important mills in Bradford alone that face an uncertain future. “Wander for 10 minutes in any direction in one of England’s northern cities, and you’ll find a mill in trouble,” said Nigel Grizzard, a Leeds-based historian and organiser of Our Northern Mills, which has monitored the situation since the last crisis in the 1980s. “Many people have a rosy belief that the problem has been solved, but the reality is that hundreds of buildings are in serious difficulty.” The crisis follows the stalling of the market for housing conversions, which put a premium on the sturdy buildings – stone in Yorkshire and brick in Lancashire – as characterful urban housing. Small and medium-sized firms using former wool and cotton mills as “business clusters” with communal facilities are also feeling the pinch, as well as the cost of maintenance and restrictions caused by listing as architecturally or historically important. In Greater Manchester the textile firm Leigh Spinners, which has diversified over a century from cotton and carpets to making synthetic grass for football pitches, has been seeking a buyer for 18 months for its Grade II* listed, 3.4-hectare (8.5-acre) mill to move to somewhere more modern. The company’s managing director, Peter Horrocks, said the firm, and its 40 staff, were “trapped” in the vast premises, which English Heritage considers one of the finest of its kind in the north-west. He appealed to the government to relax laws on adapting mills, including limited demolition of unwanted space. The sheer size of the buildings means that even successful complexes such as Saltaire, or Dean Clough in Halifax, which was once the largest carpet-making factory in the world, have room for new tenants. “Most of them could find you 100,000 sq ft if you were looking for space,” said Grizzard. “But for all the problems of recession, that’s the way we should be going. These are amazing buildings, built in a time of cheap materials and labour to a level of quality that we can seldom match today.” A conference hosted last week by Our Northern Mills at Saltaire heard details of a series of thriving conversions, including the local Victoria mill, whose worsted production system– from newly sheared sheep fleeces arriving on the top floor to high-quality suits emerging from the bottom one – now houses 440 flats. The complex has grown through seven years and £80m-worth of conversion and new-build, financed by a steady increase in residents from 200 in 2006 to more than 600 today. “It’s a fantastic place, as is Saltaire,” said Grizzard. “So are the lofts and apartments which Urban Splash is making at Manningham mills,” (another behemoth of a building whose silk and velvet products were rated the finest in the UK in Victorian times). “Potential development is still there, but needs a hand from a thorough survey of mills at risk. We’ve got to raise the profile of these truly important buildings.” At Leigh, English Heritage is hoping to broker talks between Leigh Spinners and developers with a track record of conversions. Although large-scale schemes may be on hold until better economic times, a spokeswoman said that grants for repairs were likely to be available and feasibility studies could be funded by a local heritage trust – a model that has triggered rescues elsewhere. Revival may also be helped by concern over threats to green belts around the UK’s urban areas. Most mills are on urban “brownfield” land, which local authorities and central government are targeting as the best place for new retail parks and homes. Frances Armitage-Smith, a Manchester architect with specialist experience of mills, said: “These buildings have already demonstrated their adaptability over time. Mill space is commonly rented out cheaply as warehousing, but could support more beneficial new uses cost effectively, especially as building land in many northern cities is now at a premium because developers have been land-banking during the recession.” Our Northern Mills is planning a larger conference and workshop later this year, supplemented by a TV documentary and online campaign. The last major renaissance for northern mills, following a crisis in the 1980s when even Saltaire and Dean Clough were in danger of demolition, began when entrepreneurs moved in at the nadir of the property slump. One in danger – Bradford Conditioning House – is an ornate monument to the city’s textile heyday, built by a special act of parliament in 1887 to test wool for diseases such as anthrax. The only one in the UK, its scientific status was marked by ornately carved sandstone and fine ironwork, but it was declared redundant and closed by the city council in 1990. Since then, a succession of conversion schemes have stalled or foundered, including headquarters for the regional Revenue & Customs and a retail village. The condition of the unique complex, which included a Moth Room to study insect infestation and a Light Room to check colour fastness, is causing increasing concern. One saved mill – Redbrick Mill in Batley, West Yorkshire – was a rundown complex two decades ago, left over from the “shoddy and mungo” industries, the Cinderella of the textile industry in which rags and scrap cloth were pulped and reformed.. A rescue in 1999 by the entrepreneur Steven Battye, who failed the 11-plus but went on to found the Skopos design firm, saw conversion to a retail centre whose designer outlets and stores, including Heals and Conran, still have locals blinking. Battye, who died last year, said optimism was the key. “We took a building worth practically nothing and turned it into a magnet for all kinds of firms who would otherwise not be in this part of West Yorkshire.” Heritage Regeneration Communities Conservation Martin Wainwright guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Recession threatens trouble at mills

After escaping demolition in the 1980s, Victorian textile mills are once again facing an uncertain future, say conservationists The cathedrals of the north, with their evocative roll call of names such as Black Dyke, Titanic and Goitside, are at risk again from recession, according to conservationists and historians. The economic squeeze is reviving fears last allayed two decades ago that the UK’s heritage of Victorian textile mills is under renewed threat from the ball-and-chain and bulldozer. Success stories such as Saltaire near Bradford, one of the country’s biggest buildings which is now a world heritage site ranking beside Stonehenge, disguise a wider, much bleaker picture. A report highlights more than 50 architecturally important mills in Bradford alone that face an uncertain future. “Wander for 10 minutes in any direction in one of England’s northern cities, and you’ll find a mill in trouble,” said Nigel Grizzard, a Leeds-based historian and organiser of Our Northern Mills, which has monitored the situation since the last crisis in the 1980s. “Many people have a rosy belief that the problem has been solved, but the reality is that hundreds of buildings are in serious difficulty.” The crisis follows the stalling of the market for housing conversions, which put a premium on the sturdy buildings – stone in Yorkshire and brick in Lancashire – as characterful urban housing. Small and medium-sized firms using former wool and cotton mills as “business clusters” with communal facilities are also feeling the pinch, as well as the cost of maintenance and restrictions caused by listing as architecturally or historically important. In Greater Manchester the textile firm Leigh Spinners, which has diversified over a century from cotton and carpets to making synthetic grass for football pitches, has been seeking a buyer for 18 months for its Grade II* listed, 3.4-hectare (8.5-acre) mill to move to somewhere more modern. The company’s managing director, Peter Horrocks, said the firm, and its 40 staff, were “trapped” in the vast premises, which English Heritage considers one of the finest of its kind in the north-west. He appealed to the government to relax laws on adapting mills, including limited demolition of unwanted space. The sheer size of the buildings means that even successful complexes such as Saltaire, or Dean Clough in Halifax, which was once the largest carpet-making factory in the world, have room for new tenants. “Most of them could find you 100,000 sq ft if you were looking for space,” said Grizzard. “But for all the problems of recession, that’s the way we should be going. These are amazing buildings, built in a time of cheap materials and labour to a level of quality that we can seldom match today.” A conference hosted last week by Our Northern Mills at Saltaire heard details of a series of thriving conversions, including the local Victoria mill, whose worsted production system– from newly sheared sheep fleeces arriving on the top floor to high-quality suits emerging from the bottom one – now houses 440 flats. The complex has grown through seven years and £80m-worth of conversion and new-build, financed by a steady increase in residents from 200 in 2006 to more than 600 today. “It’s a fantastic place, as is Saltaire,” said Grizzard. “So are the lofts and apartments which Urban Splash is making at Manningham mills,” (another behemoth of a building whose silk and velvet products were rated the finest in the UK in Victorian times). “Potential development is still there, but needs a hand from a thorough survey of mills at risk. We’ve got to raise the profile of these truly important buildings.” At Leigh, English Heritage is hoping to broker talks between Leigh Spinners and developers with a track record of conversions. Although large-scale schemes may be on hold until better economic times, a spokeswoman said that grants for repairs were likely to be available and feasibility studies could be funded by a local heritage trust – a model that has triggered rescues elsewhere. Revival may also be helped by concern over threats to green belts around the UK’s urban areas. Most mills are on urban “brownfield” land, which local authorities and central government are targeting as the best place for new retail parks and homes. Frances Armitage-Smith, a Manchester architect with specialist experience of mills, said: “These buildings have already demonstrated their adaptability over time. Mill space is commonly rented out cheaply as warehousing, but could support more beneficial new uses cost effectively, especially as building land in many northern cities is now at a premium because developers have been land-banking during the recession.” Our Northern Mills is planning a larger conference and workshop later this year, supplemented by a TV documentary and online campaign. The last major renaissance for northern mills, following a crisis in the 1980s when even Saltaire and Dean Clough were in danger of demolition, began when entrepreneurs moved in at the nadir of the property slump. One in danger – Bradford Conditioning House – is an ornate monument to the city’s textile heyday, built by a special act of parliament in 1887 to test wool for diseases such as anthrax. The only one in the UK, its scientific status was marked by ornately carved sandstone and fine ironwork, but it was declared redundant and closed by the city council in 1990. Since then, a succession of conversion schemes have stalled or foundered, including headquarters for the regional Revenue & Customs and a retail village. The condition of the unique complex, which included a Moth Room to study insect infestation and a Light Room to check colour fastness, is causing increasing concern. One saved mill – Redbrick Mill in Batley, West Yorkshire – was a rundown complex two decades ago, left over from the “shoddy and mungo” industries, the Cinderella of the textile industry in which rags and scrap cloth were pulped and reformed.. A rescue in 1999 by the entrepreneur Steven Battye, who failed the 11-plus but went on to found the Skopos design firm, saw conversion to a retail centre whose designer outlets and stores, including Heals and Conran, still have locals blinking. Battye, who died last year, said optimism was the key. “We took a building worth practically nothing and turned it into a magnet for all kinds of firms who would otherwise not be in this part of West Yorkshire.” Heritage Regeneration Communities Conservation Martin Wainwright guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Filesharing curbs face court delay

Plans to restrict illegal filesharing could be delayed for at least a year as measures are battled out in high court Government plans to curb illegal filesharing could be delayed for at least a year as its most contentious measures are battled out in the high court. The UK’s two biggest internet service providers, BT and TalkTalk, will on Wednesday challenge the Digital Economy Act in a judicial review, on the basis that its proposals to tackle illicit filesharing infringe users’ “basic rights and freedoms” and received insufficient parliamentary scrutiny . The two companies together have 8.4m subscribers, and have repeatedly expressed opposition to elements of the act. The high court is expected to rule on whether the challenge can go ahead on Friday. If it agrees, the process of review could take until spring 2012, delaying implementation of the act even further, while content companies assert that illicit filesharing is costing UK businesses £400m annually in lost sales. The act was due to come into force in January, but has been delayed by a series of regulatory hurdles and now by the legal challenge. The outcome of the challenge is “critical” to the future of the act, a senior television executive told the Guardian. TV companies are increasingly concerned at the volume of their content being swapped over filesharing networks. Under the act, rights holders will collect data about people believed to be downloading film and music from filesharing sites. Internet providers will then match the rights holders’ data against their customer database and send warning letters to those accused. Repeat copyright infringers could have their internet access slowed or even blocked under secondary measures in the act. However, this second phase is understood to be about 18 months away from being considered as part of the measures. “Since the DEA passed into law there has been a considerable amount of work to do to implement the mass notification system,” said a spokesman for the Department for Culture, Media and Sport. “Secondary legislation setting out how the system will be paid for and how it will work has to be passed by parliament. Ofcom also has to set up an appeals process.” Jeremy Hunt, the culture secretary, last month passed one of the act’s most contentious measures – blocking access to websites accused of enabling filesharing – to Ofcom to review whether it is workable. The communications regulator is expected to report back in the summer. Copyright owners, largely represented by the Motion Picture Association and the British Phonographic Industry, support the act’s attempt to crack down on piracy but have become discouraged at its protracted and slow progress. The act’s cost-sharing arrangements also burden film and music bodies with 75% of the costs of the “mass notification system”, with internet providers footing 25% of the bill. Film bodies are more interested in forcing internet providers to block access to allegedly infringing sites , and are understood to have drawn up a blacklist list of around 90 so-called “cyberlocker” sites. The high court’s judicial review judgment is likely to be appealed by whichever side loses, further delaying its implementation. “The impact of online copyright infringement on the creative industries is huge,” said Christine Payne, general secretary of the creative industries trade union Equity. “The DEA is the result of many years of discussion between government, industry and trade unions to try to provide a framework to legislate against online copyright infringement. We believe we had no choice to intervene to give the government support for this case.” • To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. • If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly “for publication”. Filesharing Digital media Internet Computing Media law Josh Halliday guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Filesharing curbs face court delay

Plans to restrict illegal filesharing could be delayed for at least a year as measures are battled out in high court Government plans to curb illegal filesharing could be delayed for at least a year as its most contentious measures are battled out in the high court. The UK’s two biggest internet service providers, BT and TalkTalk, will on Wednesday challenge the Digital Economy Act in a judicial review, on the basis that its proposals to tackle illicit filesharing infringe users’ “basic rights and freedoms” and received insufficient parliamentary scrutiny . The two companies together have 8.4m subscribers, and have repeatedly expressed opposition to elements of the act. The high court is expected to rule on whether the challenge can go ahead on Friday. If it agrees, the process of review could take until spring 2012, delaying implementation of the act even further, while content companies assert that illicit filesharing is costing UK businesses £400m annually in lost sales. The act was due to come into force in January, but has been delayed by a series of regulatory hurdles and now by the legal challenge. The outcome of the challenge is “critical” to the future of the act, a senior television executive told the Guardian. TV companies are increasingly concerned at the volume of their content being swapped over filesharing networks. Under the act, rights holders will collect data about people believed to be downloading film and music from filesharing sites. Internet providers will then match the rights holders’ data against their customer database and send warning letters to those accused. Repeat copyright infringers could have their internet access slowed or even blocked under secondary measures in the act. However, this second phase is understood to be about 18 months away from being considered as part of the measures. “Since the DEA passed into law there has been a considerable amount of work to do to implement the mass notification system,” said a spokesman for the Department for Culture, Media and Sport. “Secondary legislation setting out how the system will be paid for and how it will work has to be passed by parliament. Ofcom also has to set up an appeals process.” Jeremy Hunt, the culture secretary, last month passed one of the act’s most contentious measures – blocking access to websites accused of enabling filesharing – to Ofcom to review whether it is workable. The communications regulator is expected to report back in the summer. Copyright owners, largely represented by the Motion Picture Association and the British Phonographic Industry, support the act’s attempt to crack down on piracy but have become discouraged at its protracted and slow progress. The act’s cost-sharing arrangements also burden film and music bodies with 75% of the costs of the “mass notification system”, with internet providers footing 25% of the bill. Film bodies are more interested in forcing internet providers to block access to allegedly infringing sites , and are understood to have drawn up a blacklist list of around 90 so-called “cyberlocker” sites. The high court’s judicial review judgment is likely to be appealed by whichever side loses, further delaying its implementation. “The impact of online copyright infringement on the creative industries is huge,” said Christine Payne, general secretary of the creative industries trade union Equity. “The DEA is the result of many years of discussion between government, industry and trade unions to try to provide a framework to legislate against online copyright infringement. We believe we had no choice to intervene to give the government support for this case.” • To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. • If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly “for publication”. Filesharing Digital media Internet Computing Media law Josh Halliday guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

If you’ve got HBO, set your recording devices for this show if you’re not going to be home Monday night. It premiers at 9pm eastern time March 21st. Laura Clawson did a very good write up on this at Daily KOS — Triangle: Remembering the Fire : This is the week of the 100th anniversary of the Triangle fire, and tomorrow (Monday) night at 9:00, HBO is airing a new documentary. Triangle: Remembering the Fire is relatively brief, but it adds a great deal to the sketch, on several levels. The documentary first places the Triangle fire in context: Less than two years earlier, garment workers had gone on strike in the Uprising of 20,000 , making outrageous demands like a 52-hour work week and overtime pay. Meanwhile, the fiercely anti-union owners of the Triangle factory met with owners of the 20 largest factories to form a manufacturing association. Many of the strike leaders worked there, and the Triangle owners wanted to make sure other factory owners were committed to doing whatever it took—from using physical force (by hiring thugs to beat up strikers) to political pressure (which got the police on their side)—to not back down. Soon after, police officers began arresting strikers, and judges fined them and sentenced some to labor camps. One judge, while sentencing a picketer for “incitement,” explained, “You are striking against God and Nature, whose law is that man shall earn his bread by the sweat of his brow. You are on strike against God!” The Triangle company held out, the workers went back, and the safety concerns they raised went unaddressed. That New York’s garment workers had been fighting for better treatment, and that many of the fire’s deaths might have been prevented had they succeeded, is a central part of the context Triangle: Remembering the Fire provides. That context of struggle is crucial to understanding the fire’s aftermath, in which New York instituted a range of workplace protections. Frances Perkins would later famously call March 25, 1911 “the day the New Deal began.” Much more there on the documentary so go read the rest. I also wanted to share this with everyone here. I transcribed part of a book I bought some years back titled Labor’s Untold Story, written by the United Radio, Electrical and Machine Workers of America back in 1955. It’s out of print but you can still buy a copy at Amazon here . We don’t teach this history in our schools, so I’m glad to see HBO doing this sort of documentary. It’s important that we understand what it took to get so many of the things we take for granted right now and now easily we could go back to these days if we don’t understand that the ultra-rich basically consider most of us a commodity that’s expendable. And before you read the excerpt from the book below, a warning that some of it is not safe for work due to a few curse words. It’s pages 186-191 of the book and recounts the incident at Triangle and the other strikes and the lifestyles of the Robber Barons around the time of the fire at the Triangle factory. The more things change, the more they stay the same. The rich are using the same playbook now that they did back in the early 1900′s. Control the press so you propagandize the public, go after public education, use religious leaders to help your cause and trash unions. In addition, the commission found, the Morgans, Rockefellers, and their allies were controlling the thoughts of Americans as well as their lives. Through monopoly ownership of influence, the press expressed monopoly’s policies. Moreover, Wall Street was increasingly controlling public education, as well as colleges, universities, professors, and preachers through gifts, endowments, and foundations. The report continued: The domination by the men in whose hands the final control of a large part of American industry rests is not limited to their employees, but is being rapidly extended to control the education and “social service” of the Nation. This control is being extended largely through the creation of enormous privately managed funds for indefinite purposes, hereinafter designated as “foundations” by the endowment of colleges and universities, by the creation of funds for the pensioning of teachers, by contributions to private charities as well as through controlling or influencing the public press… Apart from these foundations, there is developing a degree of control over the teachings of professors in our colleges and universities, which constitutes a serious menace. In June of this year [1915] two professors were dropped… [one] professor of law in a state university, who had acted as counsel for the strikers in Colorado; the other, a professor of economics active in the fights in behalf of child labor legislation and other progressive measures. Turning to women workers, the commission declared that nearly one-half of them earned less than $6 weekly and asked: Six dollars a week—what does it mean to many? Three theater tickets, gasoline for the week, or the price of a dinner for two; a pair of shoes, three pairs of gloves, or the cost of an evening at bridge. To the [working] girl it means that every penny must be counted, every normal desire stifled, and every basic necessity of life barely satisfied by the sacrifice of some other necessity. The conditions under which most women worked were described by Louise Marion Bosworth in 1911: In one factory of a well-known hat company the women stitch all day in a gloomy room with bare and dirty brick walls, the floor cluttered with crumbs, crusts and dirty cups from the brief lunch on the work tables. They work ten hours a day, only stopping long enough to heat some cold tea at noon… In a box factory the girls take off their street suits and put on old skirts and waists matted with glue and dirt, in which they spend ten hours a day “scoring,” cutting and snipping, wetting great sheets of paper with paste… lifting the heavy finished boxes back and forth, or deftly covering little ones and throwing them rapidly into a basket, at a few cents a day. In an overall factory, the light is so poor, and soot-caked windows make it so dim, that some of the women who work there say they cannot stand the eye strain and will have to work elsewhere. In one shoe factory town many complaints are heard about the ventilators; in winter the windows are kept closed until the girls’ shirt waists are wet with perspiration. Then at five the suddenly emerge into the winter air and consequently have perpetual coughs. Thirty-seven percent of working class mothers, according to the Industrial Commission were forced to work for wages in addition to caring for their families. On New York’s East Side, where the sweatshops were filled with thousands of working women, the intolerable conditions under which they worked were brought to the attention of the public by the tragedy of the Triangle fire, when one hundred and forty-six women were burned to death in a crowded, packed loft from which there was no effective escape. Militant Jewish workers, most of them fresh from Czarist Russia and possessed of a rich tradition of struggle on behalf of labor organizations and against anti-Semitic programs, rose in revolt against sweatshop conditions in the needle trades at about this time. Herded together in broken-down tenements or in basements, the air saturated with dust and stench, they worked as many as fourteen hours a day at wages not enough to support themselves, much less their families, the helpless victims of a speed-up system that added to the wrecking of their health and vitality. Ill-ventilated and disease-breeding, the shops in which these workers toiled were more often firetraps, as illustrated by the tragic Triangle Waist Company fire. It was against these sweatshop conditions with their low wages, killing speed-up and hazardous working set-up that tens of thousands of Jewish needle workers from New York’s East Side revolted in a series of great strikes. In 1909 twenty thousand shirt-waist makers, four-fifths of whom were women, went out on strike. Their bravery and unity on the picket lines led the then not too militant Sam Gompers, AFL president, to make the following observation: “The girls were willing to go hungry and many of them did so; they braved the ruffianly police while peacefully picketing, went to imprisonment as part of their duty to their comrades when sentenced by unsympathetic magistrates, skillfully and energetically aroused a sentiment in their favor in the community, and finally convinced their employers that they had learned the merits of combination for their plainly just purposes. The following year, 1910, saw over sixty thousand cloakmakers, the vast majority of them Jewish, go out on strike and after a courageous and militant struggle win a collective bargaining agreement. The signing of this “Protocal of Peace” established the International Ladies Garment Workers Union, founded ten years before, on a solid basis. From 1910 to 1920 the union spread to Chicago, Boston, Cleveland, and other cities and by 1920 had a membership of over 100,000. The uprisings of 1909-1910 in the women’s clothing industries had their union repercussions in the men’s clothing field. In 1910 the workers of Hart, Schaffner & Marz, the largest clothing manufacturing company in the country, went out in a city-wide strike in Chicago, the strike ending with the company recognizing the United Garment Workers Union. As more and more of the industry was organized, chiefly as a result of the militant strikes of tens of thousands of Jewish workers, a rank-and-file movement developed against the Rickert clique that dominated the Garment workers. When in 1914 these rank-and-filers were refused seats at the Garment Workers Convention and their request for recognition was denied by the conservative AFL officialdom, they founded the amalgamated Clothing Workers Union in 1915. Within fours years the militant leadership of the new union was able to organize a majority of the leading clothing manufacturers in the country. Meanwhile unions were organizing women’s auxiliaries. Annie Clemence, a Slav girl of about twenty-four, was the president of the ladies’ auxiliary of the Western Federation of Miners in Michigan’s copper country. There, 15,000 copper miners with an average pay of $1 a day were on strike against the Calumet and Hecla Mining Company. The officials of the company had announced a 400 percent stockholders’ dividend a short time before the strike was called, not long before Christmas of 1913. Annie Clemence had organized a Christmas party for the children of the strikers in a hall with only one exit and that at the foot of a long and narrow stairway. A deputy, intent on breaking up the party, shouted “Fire!” when there was no fire. Ella Reeve Bloor (“Mother Bloor”), then a Socialist organizer, was a witness. She writes: On Christmas eve the children gathered in a hall where Annie had fixed up a Christmas tree. First the children sang, and then the presents were given out. A little towheaded Finnish girl of about 13, with long braids down her back got up and said, “Don’t be scared, many had gone through one door, as the room was still crowded. We tried to keep the entertainment going. The little girl kept on playing. In about five minutes the door at the back of the room opened, and a man came into the room with a little limp figure in his arms. Another man followed, carrying another child. Then another, and another, and another. They laid the little bodies in a row on the platform beneath the Christmas tree. The children were dead… There were some seventy three of them. I can hardly tell about it or even think about it even today. The people in the hall were deadly silent, frozen with horror. Then Annie screamed, “Are there any more children dead?” And one of the deputies said “What’s the matter with you? None of these children are yours, are they?” She cried out, tears streaming down her face, “They are all mine—all my children… They kept bringing the children up the stairs, into the hall, as the people rushed forward in agony and fear to look for their own. Priests arrived and began to pray for the dead. Then Annie went wild and started pummeling the priests and pushed them away from the children, because the same priests had been preaching against the strike. “Don’t let these scab priests touch these children!” she cried. The deputies took her away and locked her up in the courthouse. Then they came for the bodies of the children, took them to the courthouse, and kept them there at night, until they could get undertakers. The Morgans, Rockefellers, and their ilk who had not gone to war in 1861 were old men now. Their sons were overseeing their mammoth empires that they had acquired as the ruthless Robber Barons while, uncertain and sometimes not quite clear as to exactly what was happening, they doddered around, enjoying their simple hobbies. Old John D, who had shrunk until he resembled a mummy with bright bird-like eyes, had fastened on the innocent enjoyment of giving a single new dime to every person he met. Morgan, his imperial mein now vanquished by illness, his black eyes rheumy with age, fumbled through the long lines of treasures he had collected from all the earth, a solitary figure moving through medieval armor, Chinese porcelains, rare old books and manuscripts, jewels, and paintings stretching into the distance in the vast white marble palace he had built for them. He died in Rome on the last day of March in 1913. Carnegie, now “a rosy, twinkling old man,” had apparently forgotten the massacre at Homestead, so great was his delight in his baronial castle at Skibo on the coast of Scotland. He liked to have a bagpiper wake him at eight in the morning by skirling, first from a far distance and then nearer and nearer and nearer the castle. He had his private organist play for him each morning at breakfast and had constructed a miniature waterfall to tinkle outside of his bedroom window. He died in his castle in 1919. Old John D. outlived them all. Each day he was propped up and taken out to the golf course where a servant was posted to periodically shout at the man whose very glance had once made rivals of quail, “Keep your head down! Keep your head down!” His son, John D. Rockefeller, Jr. liked to think that the old man’s understanding was as mighty as ever, taking pleasure in telling him about the strike of Colorado coal miners in 1914 against the Rockefeller-dominated Colorado Fuel & Iron company. “I know,” he wrote. L.M. Bowers, chairman of the company’s board of directors, “that my father has followed the events of the last few months in connection with the fuel company with unusual interest and satisfaction.” The events that the old man was following with such unusual interest and satisfaction included the eviction of the strikers, members of the United Mine Workers of America, from their company-owned houses. The miners were living in tents in Ludlow, their colony surrounded by the National Guard. The militiamen occasionally shot into the colony, particularly at night. The women were terribly afraid that some of their children would be killed. They decided to dig a cave inside the largest tent. There they put thirteen children and a pregnant woman. That night, it was in Easter, 1914, company-employed gunmen and members of the National Guard drenched the strikers’ tents with oil. They ignited them after the miners and their families were asleep. When the miners, their wives, and children ran from the burning tents, they were machine-gunned. Most escaped in the darkness, many were wounded, but the thirteen children and the woman in the cave were killed, some shot to death, others suffocated. One of the Ludlow strikers, William Snyder, testified at the coroner’s inquest. His eleven-year-old son had been killed, shot through the head. They set fire to the tent?” Snyder was asked. Yes, sir. My wife then said, “For God’s sake save my children.” What did they say to you? They said, ‘What in the hell are you doing here?’ I told them I was trying to save my children, and they said, “You son of a bitch get out of there and get out damn quick at that.” My wife was out by that time… I told them to hold on, I had a boy killed in there, and they told me to get out damn quick. I picked up the boy and laid him down outside so I could get better hold of him. I asked some of these fellows to help me carry him to the depot, and he said “God damn you, aren’t you big enough?” I said, “I can do it.” I took him on my shoulder, and sister on the other arm, and just then one of these militiamen stopped me and said, “God damn you, you son of a bitch, I have a notion to kill you right now.” He said “You red-neck son of a bitch, I have a notion to kill you right now. Another woman, and five men, all of them strikers, were killed that night in addition to the thirteen children. Perhaps old John D. was never told about it. The son took full responsibility for it, saying it was the unfortunate outcome of a principled fight he was bound to make for the protection of the workingman against the trade unions. The Robber Barons were gone but their sons were following in their footsteps. J.P. Morgan’s son and namesake, who later took a similar stand for the open shop, also proved himself worthy of his father. But the miners felt differently about the Ludlow Massacre. They erected a monument to it which still stands. Carved in stone are the figures of a miner and his wife. At their feet lies a slain child. The inscription reads: Erected by the United Mine Workers of America, to the memory of the men, women and little children who died in freedom’s cause, April 20, 1914.

Continue reading …
Julian Fellowes brings Titanic to ITV

Downton Abbey writer to retell story of the sinking of liner in a six-part, seven-hour mini-series Downton Abbey writer Julian Fellowes’s next ITV drama is to be a mini-series about the sinking of the Titanic. Fellowes, who hit on a successful, Oscar-winning formula of interweaving the lives of upper and lower classes in the movie Gosford Park and repeated it for last year’s ITV1 hit Downton Abbey, will take a similar approach in retelling the story of the sinking of the Titanic on 14 April 1912. ITV promised that viewers will be “taken on a heart-wrenching journey through Titanic’s last hours, as the drama reveals which of the characters they have come to know so well will survive … and who does not”. “Interweaving multi-arc action, mystery and romantic plotlines and featuring fictional and historical characters, Titanic will focus on different characters ranging from steerage passengers to upper class guests,” the broadcaster said. “Each point of view will culminate in a cliffhanger as the ship begins to founder, building to an explosive conclusion which draws together each of the stories.” The sinking of the Titanic was a key plot point in Downton Abbey, with the heir to the title of Earl of Grantham going down on the “unsinkable” liner in the first episode, bringing the much-debated “entail” into play. Filming will begin on the six-part, seven-hour mini-series in Hungary in the spring and the drama has already been snapped up by foreign broadcasters including ABC in the US and Channel Seven in Australia. Maria Kyriacou, managing director at ITV Studios Global Entertainment, said: “The fantastic pedigree of the production talent behind this major series has generated huge interest from our global broadcast clients and we are very pleased to announce these new partners today. Providing a vividly different experience of the ship’s last hours alongside a definitive snapshot of what was a unique and uncertain moment in history.” Titanic is a UK/Hungary/Canada co-production and will be produced by Nigel Stafford-Clark and Chris Thompson. The executive producers are Simon Vaughan (Lookout Point), Kate Bartlett (ITV), Jennifer Kawaja, Julia Sereny (both Sienna Films), Howard Ellis and Adam Goodman (Mid Atlantic Films), and David Collins (Samson Films). •

Continue reading …
Julian Fellowes brings Titanic to ITV

Downton Abbey writer to retell story of the sinking of liner in a six-part, seven-hour mini-series Downton Abbey writer Julian Fellowes’s next ITV drama is to be a mini-series about the sinking of the Titanic. Fellowes, who hit on a successful, Oscar-winning formula of interweaving the lives of upper and lower classes in the movie Gosford Park and repeated it for last year’s ITV1 hit Downton Abbey, will take a similar approach in retelling the story of the sinking of the Titanic on 14 April 1912. ITV promised that viewers will be “taken on a heart-wrenching journey through Titanic’s last hours, as the drama reveals which of the characters they have come to know so well will survive … and who does not”. “Interweaving multi-arc action, mystery and romantic plotlines and featuring fictional and historical characters, Titanic will focus on different characters ranging from steerage passengers to upper class guests,” the broadcaster said. “Each point of view will culminate in a cliffhanger as the ship begins to founder, building to an explosive conclusion which draws together each of the stories.” The sinking of the Titanic was a key plot point in Downton Abbey, with the heir to the title of Earl of Grantham going down on the “unsinkable” liner in the first episode, bringing the much-debated “entail” into play. Filming will begin on the six-part, seven-hour mini-series in Hungary in the spring and the drama has already been snapped up by foreign broadcasters including ABC in the US and Channel Seven in Australia. Maria Kyriacou, managing director at ITV Studios Global Entertainment, said: “The fantastic pedigree of the production talent behind this major series has generated huge interest from our global broadcast clients and we are very pleased to announce these new partners today. Providing a vividly different experience of the ship’s last hours alongside a definitive snapshot of what was a unique and uncertain moment in history.” Titanic is a UK/Hungary/Canada co-production and will be produced by Nigel Stafford-Clark and Chris Thompson. The executive producers are Simon Vaughan (Lookout Point), Kate Bartlett (ITV), Jennifer Kawaja, Julia Sereny (both Sienna Films), Howard Ellis and Adam Goodman (Mid Atlantic Films), and David Collins (Samson Films). •

Continue reading …
Just how many universes are there?

Brian Greene , professor of physics and mathematics at Columbia University , joins us in the studio to help us get our heads around multiverse theory. His new book The Hidden Reality is out now. Brian also poses a question that will be answered in next week’s maths special podcast. Please post any other equations you need solving or mathematical questions you would like to ask on our blog (below). Tim Jackson , professor of sustainable development at the University of Surrey and author of Prosperity Without Growth , responds to Guardian listeners’ questions in a live web chat . We sat with him throughout the Q&A session. Subscribe for free via iTunes to ensure every episode gets delivered. (Here is the non-iTunes URL feed ). Follow the podcast on our Science Weekly Twitter feed and receive updates on all breaking science news stories from Guardian Science . Email scienceweeklypodcast@gmail.com . Guardian Science is now on Facebook . You can also join our Science Weekly Facebook group . We’re always here when you need us. Listen back through our archive . Alok Jha Andy Duckworth James Kingsland

Continue reading …