enlarge America has had a lot of “So it’s come to this…” moments over the past decade and the headline from this Fortune article gives us year another one: Unpaid jobs: The new normal? Yes, America, we’ve reached a point where our major business publications are asking whether it will soon become “normal” to work for absolutely no compensation whatsoever. The article itself is a tragically hilarious exposé of corporate greedheads who feel all tingly when they think about growing rich off of free labor. Just look at this: “People who work for free are far hungrier than anybody who has a salary, so they’re going to outperform, they’re going to try to please, they’re going to be creative,” says Kelly Fallis, chief executive of Remote Stylist, a Toronto and New York-based startup that provides Web-based interior design services. “From a cost savings perspective, to get something off the ground, it’s huge. Especially if you’re a small business.” In the last three years, Fallis has used about 50 unpaid interns for duties in marketing, editorial, advertising, sales, account management and public relations. She’s convinced it’s the wave of the future in human resources. “Ten years from now, this is going to be the norm,” she says. OK, so pick your jaw up off the floor and take a look at that first sentence again: “People who work for free are far hungrier than anybody who has a salary…” Well, yes. People who work for no money can’t afford to buy food and are generally hungrier. “…so they’re going to outperform, they’re going to try to please, they’re going to be creative…” “…this one guy, who redesigned my entire website for a bag of Doritos last week, I got him to literally lick my boot. He actually licked it! I thought that only happened in the movies!” Like others who have used unpaid labor, Remote Stylist’s Kelly Fallis recommends beginning with a very specific job description and conducting a thorough hiring process to screen out people who aren’t going to give their all for nothing. Candidates who respond to Fallis’ postings on Craigslist and Facebook must fill out a detailed email questionnaire and undergo two rounds of phone interviews and three in-person interviews. I can only imagine what these grueling tests consist of. My quess: Fallis has her two Doberman Pinschers take a ginormous dump on a silver plate. She then instructs job candidates to eat it. Those who swallow their pride (and a whole lot else!) will get the job. Those who refuse? BUH-BYE! Those who join Remote Stylist, whether they are students or out-of-work 20- or 30-somethings, must agree to a four-month run and sign a hiring contract. She asks interns to commit 30 hours a week; she has been burned in the past by people who were trying to juggle a paid job with their commitment to Remote Stylist. When you commit to Remote Stylist, you commit to living on the roof of a Taco Bell and to feeding only on pigeons and rats who get caught in the nearby heating ducts. Everything else must be sacrificed. John Lovejoy, managing director of multimedia fundraising company Nomadic Nation, received 300 responses for an editor position and 700 cameraman applications after only one week of advertising a project to drive from Germany to Cambodia in plastic cars. Not only were the positions unpaid, but successful candidates had to pay their own expenses. One editor and two cameramen ended up quitting before the end of the trek due to rough conditions and 16-hour workdays. In retrospect, Lovejoy says, “I would screen a little bit better and make sure they understood that this wasn’t a vacation.” Very true. Lots of people get paid while they’re on vacations, after all. This, then, is the Grand Future our corporate masters have in mind for the American worker: A bunch of poor suckers so desperate for any kind of work that they’ll agree to be modern-day serfs. And luckily for them, the GOP has decided to adopt their strategy by telling Americans that we should be willing to take massive pay cuts so that our corporate masters will deign to hire us again. Something tells me this won’t go over well in Real America once they figure out what’s really up.
Continue reading …enlarge America has had a lot of “So it’s come to this…” moments over the past decade and the headline from this Fortune article gives us year another one: Unpaid jobs: The new normal? Yes, America, we’ve reached a point where our major business publications are asking whether it will soon become “normal” to work for absolutely no compensation whatsoever. The article itself is a tragically hilarious exposé of corporate greedheads who feel all tingly when they think about growing rich off of free labor. Just look at this: “People who work for free are far hungrier than anybody who has a salary, so they’re going to outperform, they’re going to try to please, they’re going to be creative,” says Kelly Fallis, chief executive of Remote Stylist, a Toronto and New York-based startup that provides Web-based interior design services. “From a cost savings perspective, to get something off the ground, it’s huge. Especially if you’re a small business.” In the last three years, Fallis has used about 50 unpaid interns for duties in marketing, editorial, advertising, sales, account management and public relations. She’s convinced it’s the wave of the future in human resources. “Ten years from now, this is going to be the norm,” she says. OK, so pick your jaw up off the floor and take a look at that first sentence again: “People who work for free are far hungrier than anybody who has a salary…” Well, yes. People who work for no money can’t afford to buy food and are generally hungrier. “…so they’re going to outperform, they’re going to try to please, they’re going to be creative…” “…this one guy, who redesigned my entire website for a bag of Doritos last week, I got him to literally lick my boot. He actually licked it! I thought that only happened in the movies!” Like others who have used unpaid labor, Remote Stylist’s Kelly Fallis recommends beginning with a very specific job description and conducting a thorough hiring process to screen out people who aren’t going to give their all for nothing. Candidates who respond to Fallis’ postings on Craigslist and Facebook must fill out a detailed email questionnaire and undergo two rounds of phone interviews and three in-person interviews. I can only imagine what these grueling tests consist of. My quess: Fallis has her two Doberman Pinschers take a ginormous dump on a silver plate. She then instructs job candidates to eat it. Those who swallow their pride (and a whole lot else!) will get the job. Those who refuse? BUH-BYE! Those who join Remote Stylist, whether they are students or out-of-work 20- or 30-somethings, must agree to a four-month run and sign a hiring contract. She asks interns to commit 30 hours a week; she has been burned in the past by people who were trying to juggle a paid job with their commitment to Remote Stylist. When you commit to Remote Stylist, you commit to living on the roof of a Taco Bell and to feeding only on pigeons and rats who get caught in the nearby heating ducts. Everything else must be sacrificed. John Lovejoy, managing director of multimedia fundraising company Nomadic Nation, received 300 responses for an editor position and 700 cameraman applications after only one week of advertising a project to drive from Germany to Cambodia in plastic cars. Not only were the positions unpaid, but successful candidates had to pay their own expenses. One editor and two cameramen ended up quitting before the end of the trek due to rough conditions and 16-hour workdays. In retrospect, Lovejoy says, “I would screen a little bit better and make sure they understood that this wasn’t a vacation.” Very true. Lots of people get paid while they’re on vacations, after all. This, then, is the Grand Future our corporate masters have in mind for the American worker: A bunch of poor suckers so desperate for any kind of work that they’ll agree to be modern-day serfs. And luckily for them, the GOP has decided to adopt their strategy by telling Americans that we should be willing to take massive pay cuts so that our corporate masters will deign to hire us again. Something tells me this won’t go over well in Real America once they figure out what’s really up.
Continue reading …Left-wing funder extraordinaire George Soros isn’t content with just promoting his long list of liberal causes. He wants to remake the global economy. This plan, first revealed by the Media Research Center last week , continues to get more obvious. Soros has spent $50 million getting the group INET ( Institute for New Economic Thinking ) to throw a remake of the famous Bretton Woods conference held near the end of World War II. This conference begins April 8 and Soros’s goal is to “establish new international rules” and “reform the currency system.” It’s all according to a plan laid out in a Nov. 4, 2009, Soros op-ed calling for “ a grand bargain that rearranges the entire financial order .” Of course it’s gotten little press, despite having eight separate journalists on the list of 90 speakers. That list includes six from The Financial Times, which hasn’t mentioned INET since November. Though the Soros-funded INET keeps adding new speakers, more than two-thirds of those are still connected directly to George Soros. Some of the newer additions are also blatantly liberal, in case there was any doubt about the nature of the event. A few of the new additions include: Brad DeLong , professor of Economics, University of California at Berkeley. DeLong is both a prominent liberal economist and a perennial defender of Soros. DeLong even went so far as to connect criticism of Soros with anti-Semitism, calling one graphic from “The O’Reilly Factor,” the “Protocols of the Elders of George Soros.” According to DeLong’s own blog, INET funds the Berkeley economics department for $1.25 million . “The University of California, Berkeley's Department of Economics is the recipient of a $1.25 million grant from the Institute for New Economic Thinking (INET) to develop a Berkeley Economic History Laboratory. The new lab will train economists to be more historically literate so they can better contribute to policy debates … The award is the largest of 30 first round grants announced recently by the institute.” Wendy Carlin, professor of Economics, University College London, is yet another speaker connected directly to INET, which is sponsoring the conference with Soros funding. Carlin is a member of the advisory board . Barry C. Lynn , the director of the Markets, Enterprise, and Resiliency Initiative, and a senior fellow at the Soros-funded New America Foundation, a liberal think tank. Wolfgang Munchau , co-founder and
Continue reading …My, they really are hypocrites of the highest degree , aren’t they? After all the water they carried for the insurance industry for Medicare Part B, and during the health care debate, they’re going to try to pin AARP with making money on insurance ? What happened to their much-loved free market? Guess it only works when the businesses support the Republicans! I’m not always a fan of AARP (they do provide affordable insurance to people who otherwise couldn’t get it). They did a lot of work to push the Affordable Care Act, and they stand up for consumers on a wide variety of issues. Bottom line? Even if I didn’t like them at all, the fact that the Republicans have targeted them would make me want to defend them. After all, sometimes the enemy of my enemy is my friend! Newly empowered House Republicans are getting ready to renew their attacks against AARP over its support for the healthcare reform law, The Hill has learned. The Ways and Means health and oversight subcommittees are hauling in the seniors lobby’s executives before the panel for an April 1 hearing on how the group stands to benefit from the law, among other topics. Republicans say AARP supported the law’s $200 billion in cuts to the Medicare Advantage program because it stands to gain financially as seniors replace their MA plans with Medicare supplemental insurance — or Medigap — policies endorsed by the association. The hearing will cover not only Medigap but “AARP’s organizational structure, management, and financial growth over the last decade.” An embarrassing hearing would not only hit AARP back for its support of the law, but fits in with the GOP’s mantra that the law was written behind closed doors to favor Democratic allies. And policy-wise, it could empower Republicans to tackle Medigap policies, which many conservatives want to reform because they believe they contribute to over-utilization of the medical system by reducing out-of-pocket contributions. Imagine the nerve of old people actually going to the doctor’s, taking care of their health and extending their lifespan. Shame on them! Two Ways and Means Republicans — Reps. Wally Herger (Calif.), the No. 2 Republican on the panel, and Dave Reichert (Wash.) — led the charge against the seniors group during the healthcare reform debate, along with then-Rep. Ginny Brown-Waite (Fla.). “AARP unfortunately has become a mouthpiece for this president at the expense of what is best for America’s seniors,” Brown-Waite wrote in a letter to the association at the time. The AARP’s support for healthcare reform “just doesn’t make sense” until “you dig a little deeper and see that [a lot] of their revenues come from these royalties,” Reichert told The Hill during the healthcare reform debate. “And if Medicare Advantage does go away, they may gain millions of dollars in additional royalties.” Just breathtaking, the hypocrisy.
Continue reading …• Miliband shares stage with Tim Farron and Caroline Lucas • Urges voters not to treat AV poll as a referendum on Clegg Tortuous efforts to set up a cross-party platform in favour of the alternative vote have finally borne fruit with Ed Miliband, the Labour leader, Tim Farron, the Liberal Democrat president, and Caroline Lucas, the Green party leader, joining forces to back reform. Miliband insisted that voters should not decide which way to vote based on particular personalities. He said, it is not about Nick Clegg, it is about changing your voting system, and not a stick with which to beat the government. In his speech, Miliband said that despite the current Lib Dem coalition with the Conservatives, he still believed that AV would help progressive centre-left parties to “build bridges not barriers”. “The tragedy for progressive politics in Britain has been that division on the centre and left has handed a united right victory after victory,” he said. “For most of the last 80 years, there has been one Conservative party but several competing for progressive votes. No wonder the Tories back the current system. “They know Britain is not a fundamentally Conservative country. But with first-past-the-post, they are more likely to govern whenever progressive forces are divided.” Miliband was also joined by former Liberal Democrat leader in the Lords Lady Williams, shadow cabinet members John Denham and Tessa Jowell, as well as former Liberal Democrat leader Charles Kennedy. Nick Clegg, the Liberal Democrat leader, is currently in Mexico and was asked by the yes campaign not to attend on the grounds that his current unpopularity might turn voters off . Farron described the no campaign as a bunch of harrumphing majors adding: “a yes vote will put an end to safe seats for MPs”. He said the no campaign was “ridiculous, reactionary and very well resourced. They will claim in the next five weeks that if you vote yes your hospital will be closed or your police will be cut or you will be invaded by Norway.” He added: “Every MP will have to work hard for your vote rather than being protected by a medieval voting system.” He said the MPs’ expenses scandal “came out of a culture of complacency and arrogance shored up by the fact that two thirds of MPs have safe seats for life”. He claimed “the only people that should vote no are lazy MPs who do not want to do any work, newspaper proprietors that want to make sure the establishment remains intact, and if you have difficulty counting to three,” a reference to the no campaign’s claim that the AV voting system is too complex. He added the no campaign was “just making up invented cobblers, such as permanent hung parliaments and the need for expensive voting machines”. He also called on the no campaign to come clean about its funding, claiming its campaign was a wholly owned subsidiary of the Conservative party. The yes campaign also sought to rebut claims, pushed hard by the no campaign patron and former home secretary Lord Reid that AV will lead to supporters of fringe parties having extra votes once their own chosen party drops out. Farron pointed that the BNP were supporting the no campaign, adding extremist parties would be disadvantaged by AV since “extremists either vote for extremist nutters or not. They do not tend to transfer their second preferences. I have yet to meet a lukewarm fascist.” At a largely good-natured event, Farron was forced to admit he had seen the referendum as a staging post to a more proportional voting system, but he accepted this was the only change on offer. Tessa Jowell called the vote a “once in 20 or 30 year chance”, and insisted that the referendum was the last that would be held. Jowell is especially important since she needs to raise the turnout in London where there are no local elections. There are warnings that only 20% of eligible Londoners may vote. Kennedy urged Liberal Democrats not to hold back because they were not being offered a fully proportional system on 5 May . Addressing those who “fought long and hard in the wilderness for a proportional system”, he said the lesson of history is that you cannot afford the luxury of waiting for a perfect system. “This is the proposition is on the table; this represents the force for political reform and this is the chance that has got to be seized. The NotoAV campaign director, Matthew Elliott, dismissed the yes event as “a Lib Dem convention chaired by Ed Miliband”. “The only person missing from their Westminster photo-op is the man who is forcing us to have this expensive referendum – Nick Clegg,” he said. “It would be his party – the Lib Dems – that would benefit most from a switch to AV. The yes to AV campaign is just a front for the Lib Dems and they are deceiving the public if they claim otherwise.” AV Electoral reform Ed Miliband Nick Clegg Liberal Democrats Liberal-Conservative coalition Patrick Wintour guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …After comedian Bill Maher referred to Sarah Palin as a derogatory term for a vagina a little over week a ago, NewsBusters asked , “Can the dreaded C-word be far behind?” According to the Dallas Voice, this happened on Sunday while Maher was “performing” at the Winspear Opera House (photo courtesy Reuters): It’s that fearlessness — he acknowledged that some people would probably be uncomfortable with some of his remarks about religion, not to mention calling Sarah Palin a “cunt” (“there’s just no other word for her”) — that makes Maher the most dangerous person in comedy. For those unfamiliar, the Winspear Opera House is indeed where the Dallas Opera performs. Seems a metaphysical certitude that word isn't uttered on that stage very often. The reviewer – writing at the self-described “Premier Media Source For LGBT Texas” – noted: Maher spoke the truth for a nearly two-hour set, and, in my mind, established himself as the pre-eminent political commentator of a generation. He’s a comedian, too, of course. But really, he’s a voice. And that's what makes him dangerous, not just to the right but to all Americans. Maher is indeed doing political commentary. When he gets interviewed by CNN, MSNBC, or any of the broadcast network news programs, it's not to do one-liners.
Continue reading …British medical regulator calls for urgent checks on differences in medical qualifications ‘which could put patients at risk’ UK medical regulators have demanded minimum standards for doctors’ training across all 27 EU member states, saying the present variety of systems could endanger patients and undermine public confidence in healthcare and in the single market in jobs. The General Medical Council has called for urgent checks of all national medical qualifications to prevent migrant foreign doctors working outside their own country in health systems they may not understand. Lack of information about the nature and content of training in other countries means regulators “cannot have full confidence in each other’s medical training and education”, it says in its response to a European commission review of a 2005 directive that governs automatic recognition of the different systems. Nearly one in 10 of the 239,300 doctors on the UK register qualified in EU countries, Switzerland, Lithuania and Norway. NHS statistics show doctors who qualified outside the UK are more likely to be excluded or suspended from their jobs than those who trained in this country. The GMC’s devastating attack is the most outspoken critique yet of the European system which requires states to recognise each other’s medical qualifications, meaning that regulators cannot test their competence or language skills, as they can with doctors from other parts of the world. Even employers have limited powers to assess whether candidates are suitable for a particular job. These flaws were revealed by the Guardian’s investigation into the case of Daniel Ubani, a German doctor who accidentally killed 70-year-old David Gray in 2008 during his first shift as a locum GP on the out-of-hours service in Cambridgeshire. Ubani, who can still practise in Germany although struck off for incompetence in Britain, works mainly as a cosmetic surgeon and specialist in anti-ageing medicine. The GMC was unable to check whether he had ever worked as a GP in Germany. His qualification alone gave him access to the register in the UK. But the GMC has other concerns. “What is a routine treatment or procedure for a general practitioner in the UK, for example, may not be within the normal scope of a doctor trained from another [European] country.” This echoes government concerns that, for instance, GPs in Italy do not traditionally treat children as they are normally seen by specialist paediatricians. “We also have a specific on-call system [in hospitals] which means our doctors have to know the generality of a speciality. “We understand that this is not necessarily common in the rest of Europe and gives rise to a patient safety risk where the expectations placed on a doctor working in one jurisdiction, but trained in another, are not met.” The GMC document says current EU legislation “does not allow competent authorities to assure themselves that the migrant doctors they register have kept their skills and competence up to date since the award of their professional qualifications”. This, it adds, “inevitably weakens the level of confidence that competent authorities can have in the competence of doctors entering the host state”. Although the virulence of the criticism will not surprise officials in Brussels where the government and GMC have been lobbying heavily for change in the wake of the Ubani scandal, the GMC document’s analysis that the current regime is unsafe provides plenty of ammunition for those who criticise the wider culture of the EU. Rory Gray, son of the patient killed by Ubani, said: “It is great news the GMC is being so forthright. It has said the present system is a public safety risk. Of course, it is.” Sons’ battle The searing criticism of EU rules by the GMC is another victory for Rory and Stuart Gray, two of the four sons of David Gray who died after a 10-fold overdose of a painkiller administered by Daniel Ubani. Their tireless research and campaigning to expose the flaws in the English health system and the European single market for jobs highlighted by the accident have already helped fashion big changes in the out of hours system of GP care and monitoring by the NHS. Andrew Lansley, the health secretary, as part of his proposed reforms to put GPs in control of most of the NHS budget, has also made clear that he expects more local doctors to be on call for overnight and weekend calls, so that foreign locums are unnecessary. Rory, a satellite engineer in Germany, and Stuart, a GP in the West Midlands, have been driven by a burning desire to lower the risks to other patients. Their vivid articulation of system failures revealed by their father’s death has stung NHS officials in Cambridgeshire, where their father died, ministers at the Department of Health and the GMC alike. A year ago, Rory and Stuart revealed how the cause had almost taken over their lives. GPs Doctors NHS Health European commission European Union Germany James Meikle guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …President Bashar al-Assad accepts resignations amid speculation over scrapping of emergency laws The entire Syrian cabinet has resigned amid the country’s worst unrest in decades, state television has announced. President Bashar al-Assad accepted the cabinet’s resignation after a meeting on Tuesday. The move is the latest concession by the government after more than a week of mass protests calling for more political freedom . But it will not affect Assad, who holds the lion’s share of power in the regime. The president, whose family has controlled Syria for four decades and has a history of crushing dissent, is expected to address the nation in the next 24 hours in a speech that may include a promise to abolish emergency laws. Earlier, hundreds of thousands of regime supporters poured on to the streets of the capital, Damascus, and at least four other major cities, waving pictures of the president and flags as the government tried to show it has mass support. Assad is facing down the most serious threat to his family’s longstanding authority in this predominantly Sunni Muslim country, ruled by the minority Alawite sect . Assad, who has been president for 11 years and is one of the most anti-western leaders in the Middle East , is wavering between cracking down and compromising in the face of protests that began in a southern city on 18 March and spread to other areas. There was a swift crackdown by security forces and at least 61 people have been killed, according to Human Rights Watch. The unrest in this country of 23 million people could have implications beyond its borders, given its role as Iran’s leading Arab ally and as a frontline state against Israel. The government-sanctioned rallies brought hundreds of thousands of people into the streets in the provinces of Aleppo and Hasakeh, in the north, and the central cities of Hama and Homs. Schoolchildren were given the day off while bank employees and other workers were given a two-hour break to attend the demonstrations. “The people want Bashar Assad!” chanted protesters in a central Damascus square. Men, women and children gathered in front of a huge picture of Assad put up on the central bank building. “No to sectarianism and no to civil strife,” read one placard. When the Middle East protests hit Syria, it was a dramatic turn for Assad, a British-trained opthalmologist who inherited power from his father in 2000 after three decades of iron rule. In January, he said his country was immune to such unrest because he was in tune with his people’s needs. The disturbances, prompted by the arrest of several teenagers who had scrawled anti-government graffiti on to a wall in the southern agricultural city of Deraa, quickly spread to other provinces. The protests and violence have eased in the past few days but tensions persist in Deraa and the Mediterranean city of Latakia. Troops on Monday fired teargas into a crowd of some 4,000 people in Deraa who were calling for more political freedoms, witnesses said. They also fired live ammunition into the air to disperse the crowd. Syria Arab and Middle East unrest Middle East guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Rachel Maddow explains what you have to do to be a member of “The Gingrich Caucus” and you’re a neo-con that never met a war you didn’t like but can’t seem to get your talking points straight on Libya since you hate anything a Democratic president does more. Step 1—Demand U.S. military intervention in Libya. Step 2—After President Obama intervenes in Libya, oppose military intervention. Step 3—Hope no one remembers what you did in step 1.
Continue reading …Today's starter topic: Left-wing attack group Media Matters is vowing to make its attacks on Fox News personal : Media Matters, Brock said, is assembling opposition research files not only on Fox’s top executives but on a series of midlevel officials. It has hired an activist who has led a successful campaign to press advertisers to avoid Glenn Beck’s show. The group is assembling a legal team to help people who have clashed with Fox to file lawsuits for defamation, invasion of privacy or other causes. And it has hired two experienced reporters, Joe Strupp and Alexander Zaitchik, to dig into Fox’s operation to help assemble a book on the network, due out in 2012 from Vintage/Anchor. (In the interest of full disclosure, Media Matters last month also issued a report criticizing “Fox and Friends” co-host Steve Doocy’s criticism of this reporter’s blog.) Brock said Media Matters also plans to run a broad campaign against Fox’s parent company, News Corp., an effort which most likely will involve opening a United Kingdom arm in London to attack the company’s interests there. The group hired an executive from MoveOn.org to work on developing campaigns among News Corp. shareholders and also is looking for ways to turn regulators in the U.S., U.K., and elsewhere against the network.
Continue reading …