Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 1513)
Libyan foreign minister flies to UK ‘to resign’

Mousa Kousa says he is no longer willing to represent the regime in a morale boost for the rebels Muammar Gaddafi’s authority inside Libya suffered a significant blow when his foreign minister quit and fled to the UK in a specially arranged flight organised by the British intelligence services. Mousa Kousa, who was one of the Libyan leader’s closest allies, arrived on a chartered plane from Tunisia and said he was “no longer willing” to represent the dictator’s regime. We can confirm that Mousa Kousa arrived at Farnborough airport on 30 March from Tunisia,” a Foreign Office spokesman said. Kousa’s defection provides Britain with a figure of unparalleled intelligence value in terms of understanding the situation within Gaddafi’s inner circle. The move also provides a morale boost to the disorganised rebel forces who have again suffered major reverses at the hands of pro-Gaddafi forces in the past 48 hours. The Foreign Office said last night: “He travelled here under his own free will. He has told us that he is resigning his post. We are discussing this with him and we will release further detail in due course. “Mousa Kousa is one of the most senior figures in Gaddafi’s government and his role was to represent the regime internationally – something that he is no longer willing to do.” Kousa’s defection will be seen as a vindication of the coalition’s efforts to intimidate key members of the regime by warning them that if they do not defect they will be taken to the international criminal court to face war crimes trials. News of the defection first emerged after the official Tunisian news agency reported rumours that Kousa had crossed the border into Libya’s western neighbour, but without any clear indication of his motives. The Libyan government, possibly misled by Mousa Kousa, insisted he had left the country on a diplomatic mission for Gaddafi, but the foreign office then disputed this account. Britain and the US have been in regular contact with him in recent days, mainly through intelligence sources. Probably more than any other senior official inside the Libyan regime, Kousa is seen as the key figure who persuaded Gaddafi to make a deal with British intelligence agencies to stop developing weapons of mass destruction in return for the ending of its pariah status. However, his relationship with Britain in the past has been far from convivial. Kousa has previously been seen as one of the controlling forces behind the Lockerbie bombing and it was not clear whether he was seeking political asylum. In 1980, he was expelled from the UK and, for 15 years, he was head of Libyan foreign intelligence – including in the period of the Lockerbie bombing. He has always denied Libya was involved in the bombing. The Foreign Office added: “We encourage those around Gaddafi to abandon him and embrace a better future for Libya that allows political transition and real reform that meets the aspirations of the Libyan people.” “He has defected from the regime,” said Noman Benotman, a friend of Kousa and senior analyst at Britain’s Quilliam thinktank. “He wasn’t happy at all. He doesn’t support the government attacks on civilians,” he said. “He’s seeking refuge in Britain and hopes he will be treated well,” Benotman said. Kousa’s decision to abandon the regime came as it emerged that Barack Obama had signed a secret government order authorising covert US help to the Libyan rebels via such organisations as the CIA. The order, known as a “finding” was signed within the last two or three weeks. The move will undoubtedly fuel speculation that the US and its allies are planning to arm the rebels. The New York Times has reported that small groups of CIA operatives have been working in Libya for several weeks gathering intelligence for military air strikes and making contacts with the rebels battling Gaddafi’s forces, according to American officials. It also reported that “dozens” of British agents and special forces were also inside Libya, helping direct attacks by British aircraft. Both sides in the Libya conflict are running short of weapons and ammunition after almost two weeks of intense fighting that has brutally exposed the military shortcomings of the rebels, the Guardian has been told. The rebels were forced into yet another retreaton Wednesday, with Gaddafi’s forces regaining much of the territory taken by the rebels at the weekend and threatening to humiliate the western coalition by again coming within striking distance of the city of Benghazi. Concern is deepening in the coalition about the rebels’ fragile morale and lack of military experience to mount a sustained challenge to the regime. A military stalemate is now a real possibility, partly as both sides are struggling to re-equip their forces. With fighting continuing in Misrata and regime forces pushing east as far as the strategic town of Ajdabiya, the issue of rearming has become paramount. Coalition bombing raids had helped “chop the legs off” Gaddafi’s supply chain, meaning he could no longer get rockets and ammunition to the front line. “Ammunition is going to become an issue,” said a defence source. “The regime’s logistics are very stretched. Their ability to move ammunition 400 to 500 miles is becoming constraining. Regime forces have been seriously degraded. But there is more to do to prevent more bloodshed, to prevent more loss of life.” While the regime is thought to be “hurting more and missing more” because many of its heavy weapons have been destroyed, the rebels could struggle to take advantage because of their own problems. They do not have a supply chain or logistical mechanisms. Many of the rebels have not experienced being under fire before the last three weeks and there is no sign of any improvement in their fighting capability. Though the US secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, and British foreign secretary William Hague have hinted that arming the rebels might be allowed under the terms of the two UN resolutions, it is understood the UK has not provided any equipment so far, and there are no plans to do so. No training has been provided either. A defence source insisted there had been “no request for ground forces” and that the coalition had “no intention” of providing them. People who had returned to Ajdabiya after it fell to the revolutionaries on Saturday again fled on Wednesday as the government’s army seized two important oil towns further along the coastal highway, Ras Lanuf and Brega. It was not immediately clear if the regime intended to try to take Ajdabiya again after air strikes last week destroyed a significant number of tanks and armoured vehicles. But the government has pressed ahead with its counteroffensive using not only the artillery that it still retains but what appears to be a larger ground force than previously deployed. On Monday, the rebels moved within 45 miles of Sirte, the strategically and politically important birthplace of Gaddafi, and were proclaiming they would be in Tripoli before the end of the week after advancing about 200 miles in two days under the cover of the western air strikes. But the regime’s counterattack has outmanoeuvred the poorly disciplined and ill-trained rebels who barely made a stand at Brega before fleeing toward Ajdabiya. If the government were to move on Ajdabiya, that would once again open the road to Benghazi. The revolutionary leadership, which has called for an intensification of air strikes, said it was not concerned by the see-sawing military fortunes. “Whether we advance 50km or retreat 50km … it’s a big country. They will go back the next day,” said spokesman Mustafa Gheriani in Benghazi. But the situation has raised concerns that the rebels’ inability to hold territory will undermine coalition commitment. The coalition now believes it has a much clearer idea of the strengths and weaknesses of the two sides and the issues that could be crucial in the coming days and weeks. It is now thought that: • Thousands of foreign fighters are in Libya helping to support Gaddafi and more are still coming from countries such as Chad, Niger and Mali. Many are being lured to Tripoli because Gaddafi pays them well. The foreigners, some of them migrant workers, are being used for security in urban areas, freeing up other soldiers to fight the rebels. • Misrata has become a crucible of the fighting and is the focus of the regime’s attempts to snuff out the opposition. Coalition air strikes have crushed attempts by Gaddafi’s navy to blockade the city and attack it from the sea. Four Libyan vessels have been sunk, and one beached. • Al-Qaida has a negligible presence in Libya and is not considered a factor at all in the current fighting. • Gaddafi has no chemical weapons in any usable form. It is thought that he only has the remnants of the weapons programme that was dismantled in 2004, and coalition air strikes have targeted the Scud missiles that could have been used to deliver them. How the conflict now develops may depend on whether Gaddafi’s opponents in the west of the country are prepared to rise up against a regime that has promoted a culture of fear for the last 40 years. That culture is thought to be most acute inside the regime itself – Gaddafi is said to hold his lieutenants, extended family, and indeed his children in a state of near perpetual conflict and fear. The default position in society is assessed to be that any resistance to Gaddafi or his regime is something only talked about in the privacy of your own home. The scale of the deployment by UK forces has also become clear. Ten Typhoon and eight Tornado aircraft are operating out of Italy, supported by the cruise missile submarine, HMS Turbulent, which has been replaced by HMS Triumph. Getting equipment and armaments to the Mediterranean involved 24 transport aircraft, including nine C17s and 11 Hercules aircraft, and two chartered Antonov flights for 583 military personnel. The RAF so far has undertaken 130 hours of refuelling missions, involving 500,000 litres of aviation fuel. Libya Muammar Gaddafi Arab and Middle East unrest Middle East Patrick Wintour Richard Norton-Taylor Nick Hopkins Chris McGreal guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Photographer Fergus Greer’s best shot

‘Leigh Bowery would call about twice a year, saying he had some more “looks”. He called this one Future Juliet’ I first met the Australian performance artist Leigh Bowery in 1986, at one of his shows at the Anthony d’Offay gallery in London. I was a bit taken aback: Leigh was in an outfit that made him look 7ft tall, and his face was covered in paint. But he just said: “Let’s do some pictures.” That was the start of our relationship. We worked together for eight years, until he died. I was never a clubber: I’d just come out of the army and was an outsider to the world of his performance. That gave us an interest in each other. He’d call me about twice a year, saying he had some more “looks”, as he called his costumes. This one, which we did in July 1989 and Leigh called Future Juliet, was part of a series

Continue reading …
Beyoncé and her dad split

Beyoncé’s dad is no longer her manager, another case of how showbiz and parents don’t always mix It’s Johnny Sharp been 20 years since she joined her first girl group aged nine, but Beyoncé Knowles has finally parted company with father and long-time manager, Mathew. By mutual consent, they say, but you wonder if Mathew’s plans to spend more time on his gospel label were announced with all the enthusiasm of those MPs who step down to “spend more time with their families”. You could hardly blame Beyoncé. Stories are legion of Mathew’s strict control of her affairs and those of Destiny’s Child, with whom she rose to fame. And he was never a man to fall out with, as early members LaTavia Roberson and LeToya Luckett discovered when they saw the band’s video for Say My Name – and two new singers in their place. But if Beyoncé has been the instigator of this move, then it once again shows us that in showbiz, families and management rarely mix well. The rod of iron (not to mention other blunt objects) with which manager father Joe is said to have ruled the Jackson clan didn’t exactly result in pop’s happiest family, but at least none of them went as far as 80s teenpop sensation Tiffany, who, at 16, applied in court to be declared an “emancipated minor”, in effect attempting to divorce her “momager”. Last year, Kylie Minogue sacked her mother from her touring party, citing the impeccably altruistic motivation of “wanting her to relax more”. Dina Lohan’s self-effacing approach to promoting herself and her daughters/clients Lindsay and Ali as a walking, squawking soap opera has provoked much debate, while the first act of Britney Spears’s father Jamie when he became “conservator” of her affairs involved suing her old manager for allegedly drugging her. That one looks set to end well, then. Stark contrast with Paul Weller, whose father John managed him for 30 years until his death in 2009, a confidante to the end. Mind you, couldn’t John have had a word about some of those haircuts? Beyoncé Celebrity Johnny Sharp guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Senator James Inhofe’s C Street Madness: Supports Gbagbo in the Ivory Coast and wants a New Election!

Here’s Pat Robertson giving his undying support for Gbagbo. Do you think they are strange bedfellows? I’ve been writing about the Ivory Coast volatile situation for a while now. My last post summed up the situation a few days ago, but things are happening fast. Ivory Coast’s Gbagbo threatens international journalists in wake of reports of ‘heavy weapons’ being used on civilians I grilled Ben Rhodes, Deputy National Security Advisor on a blogger call yesterday about the possible genocidal ramifications there since Gbagbo has refused to give up power after losing the election and since the Obama administration has backed the Libya conflict. Enter the new crazy by James Inhofe. He’s now calling for the US to back a new election altogether and shows his love for Gbagbo. INHOFE CALLS ON U.S. TO SUPPORT NEW ELECTIONS IN COTE D’IVOIRE Amidst post-election fighting that threatens to evolve into a civil war in Cote d’Ivoire, U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.), a senior member of the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC) and a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee (SFRC), yesterday called on Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to chart a new U.S. position that demands new elections in Cote d’Ivoire to bring about peace. Inhofe, who has travelled extensively to the continent of Africa over the past fifteen years, including nine trips to Cote d’Ivoire, wrote for the second time to Clinton regarding this issue. Through his letter to Clinton, Inhofe said, “I am aware that my position is different from that of the Obama Administration, which has recognized Alassane Ouattara as the winner. I ask, however, that you change your position in light of the evidence I have provided, and that you call for a new election. Such a change would not be viewed as inconsistent, but a wise reevaluation in light of new evidence presented. It is also consistent with our American dedication to the principle that democracy works best when it works for all and not for some. I am convinced that only through a new election will the people of Cote d’Ivoire end the increasing bloodshed, stop another civil war and ensure free and fair elections.” The election results were already sanctioned by an International body so a do-over is first of all insane, but impossible because. the people have already spoken. Justin Elliott finds the ties that bind them: Why the Christian right is backing a brutal despot While the crisis has gotten substantial press attention, one aspect of Gbagbo’s past — and present — has flown under the radar: his longtime ties to the Christian right in the United States, a movement in which he still finds at least some support. That includes a U.S. senator and acquaintance of Gbagbo who declined to intervene in the crisis when asked by the State Department earlier this year, a former congressman who was hired by Gbagbo as a lobbyist, and a Christian right TV network that ran a fawning profile of Gbagbo, even as violence engulfed Ivory Coast. The senator, Jim Inhofe of Oklahoma, today released a letter to Hillary Clinton calling for new elections in Ivory Coast, putting him in direct opposition to the view of the Obama administration, the United Nations and the African Union that Gbagbo lost a fair election. Gbagbo, along with his influential wife, Simone, are evangelical Christians who are known for lacing their speeches with religious rhetoric. “God is leading our fight. God has already given us the victory,” Simone Gbagbo, who is both first lady and politician in her own right, said at a rally in January. Both Gbagbos have attended the National Prayer Breakfast, a big annual Washington event run by the secretive Christian group known as the Family, or the Fellowship. OMG, it’s the C Street connection. Of course. The Fellowship had spread it’s wings there. Chief among Gbagbo’s American supporters is Inhofe, who is the most influential Republican in the Senate when it comes to African affairs. Inhofe has been traveling to Africa regularly since the late 1990s and, while the trips are paid for by the taxpayer and typically involve some official business, the senator also engages in missionary work. He has been to Ivory Coast nine times and knows Gbagbo personally. That’s why, early on in the post-election crisis, when the State Department was frantically looking for intermediaries to reach out to Gbagbo to try to convince him to leave the country peacefully, the Obama administration asked Inhofe to talk to Gbagbo. But, according to a source familiar with the situation, Inhofe declined to do so. It’s still not entirely clear why Inhofe wouldn’t help at a moment when it might have made a real difference; I’ve asked his spokesman for comment. But a letter to Hillary Clinton released by his office today offers some clues. In it, Inhofe explicitly takes Gbagbo’s side in the election dispute — even though all international observers and election monitors say that Gbagbo lost…read on Read the whole thing. Mark Leon Goldberg earlier wrote that people were being fenced in by Gbagbo’s forces and couldn’t get much needed medicine . The UN reports that 1 million people have fled Abidjan. At least 462 people have been killed since the crisis began in December, not least of whom were six women gunned down by Gbagbo supporters during a peaceful demonstration three weeks ago. If heavy fighting spreads from the strategic town of Duekoue , an untold number will be killed. Genocide is not out of the realm of possibility. There are already reports of mass graves in Abidjan. At the very least, the country seems to be inching ever closer toward an ethnic based mass atrocity event. enlarge Credit: AFP News today broke that rebels have taken over the capital city: Forces loyal to UN-backed President-elect Alassane Ouattara have captured Ivory Coast’s capital, residents of Yamoussoukro say. They have continued their advance from the north despite incumbent leader Laurent Gbagbo’s ceasefire appeal. Mr Gbagbo refuses to stand down despite the UN saying he lost November’s poll. Abidjan is Ivory Coast’s main city, but a BBC reporter says Yamoussoukro’s capture is a major symbolic victory for the pro-Ouattara forces. The pro-Ouattara soldiers are also reported to be 100km (60 miles) north of the port of San Pedro, a major cocoa exporting centre. One million people have fled the violence – mostly from Abidjan – and at least 462 people have been killed since December, according to the UN. ‘Residents clapping’ I don’t think any sane person thinks a new election is the answer there, except for the mind of Sen. James Inhofe and his C Street buddies. What will they say when more innocents are killed while they cheer on their unelected religious despot?

Continue reading …
Stars come out in force for Mikhail Gorbachev’s 80th

Last leader of the Soviet Union celebrates his 80th birthday at the Royal Albert Hall with a charitable concert hosted by Kevin Spacey

Continue reading …
Clegg to gather social mobility data

The deputy prime minister says data collected will enable the government to see if policies are working The government is to introduce an annual “report card” to assess whether it is improving people’s life chances, drawing together seven indicators starting with babies’ body weight and going all the way through life to success in adulthood to see whether it is breaking the link between social class and achievement. Nick Clegg will publish the social mobility strategy, which will include the new quantitative measures for people’s performance at different stages in their life, on Tuesday. The new sets of numbers will give governments an indicator of whether a given policy decision is working or not, and – monitored by an independent adviser, the former Labour minister Alan Milburn – would see the government come under pressure to discard those policies having adverse effects. The deputy prime minister said the indicators would be acted on if they appeared to be highlighting a problem. He said: “Yes, it will trigger a reaction – it’s a series of dials and if one of the dials shifts the wrong way, indicators are meaningless unless you act.” Clegg described meeting resistance from Whitehall as he put together the new indicators. He was told it would create a rod for his own back. A government source drew a parallel with giving responsibility for monetary policy to the Bank of England in 1997 and the more recent transfer of analysis of the economy to the Office for Budget Responsibility. The source said: “With this, we’ll know which ones we’re failing on and see which policies are working. It will take a bit of time but year-on-year we’ll see if something is getting worse.” Clegg said: “You won’t really be able to prove you’re making a difference immediately; it will go way beyond this parliament.” The new self-assessment regime for the government has been crafted in a cabinet committee led by Clegg, and although it largely draws on data already compiled, such as babies’ birth weight and the numbers taking free school meals, some tests will need new metrics drawn up. The government has already set aside £30m to undertake an entirely new cohort study. Clegg and the universities minister, David Willetts, were in Washington on Wednesday for meetings with the US vice-president, Joe Biden. Their officials have been working together on the issue for months and their teams took part in a seminar on social mobility from school to higher education. This government, as Labour before it, is grappling with research showing that the prospect of someone born in the 1970s doing better than their parents has decreased from the same metric in the 1950s. Only one in five young people from the poorest families achieve five good GCSEs compared with three-quarters from rich families. En route to Washington, Willetts said people in their 30s still appeared to have their earnings dictated by what their parents did. Now the government want to build up a more granular picture. A government source said: “Academic measures of social mobility generally compare the income and/or social class of children during their 30s and 40s with that of their parents. They won’t tell us about the impact of current policy for at least 40 years.” Brushing off charges that the new data set would merely inquire into people’s lives without being able to do anything about it, Clegg said he believed changes brought in by the coalition government would be picked up on the indicators, though it would take longer than the course of one parliament since a policy they believe the key to increasing social mobility – the pupil premium – doesn’t come into force until 2015. Clegg pointed to changes he believed would also help: increasing the income tax free threshold; changes to welfare that will see “work pay; the new requirement that those universities charging the full £9,000 tuition fee would only be able to do so if they could show how they were opening up access to less advantaged students. Willetts also said he believed those universities will be favoured who adopt the model of universities such as Texas who reserve 10% of their places for some of the state’s poorer students. The new index will be remarkable for seeking to collect data on those already grown up as the government now believes social mobility in adults is something the state can and should monitor. Another nuance will be an attempt to make the social mobility agenda relevant to the ” squeezed middle ” by making it clear that the metrics include “aspirational measures”, measuring the life chances of those in the middle classes compared with the most advantaged, alongside a major push on the opportunities for bright but poor children. While some of the indicators suggested that only the widening or narrowing gap between the most affluent and the least affluent would be picked up, particularly ones relying on free school meals as a measure of deprivation, Clegg said others in the data set would also include grades within. He also pointed to the pupil premium, saying that in improving school discipline and so learning, it would become a greater social good for those of all social backgrounds in a class. Willetts said: “We want to improve social mobility all the way up. There are lots of people in the middle who are not doing well either. My critique of what happened under Labour would be people at the very top did well and some at the very bottom did well, but the middle did badly. This is about the aspiring member of the middle classes who wants to become a doctor or a journalist but hasn’t the connections nor been to an expensive school. Your chances to do that declined significantly under Labour.” Key Whitehall departments will be held accountable for ensuring the social mobility indicators that fall within their department, with the obvious onus on them that they help drive them down. David Willetts pointed to evidence he had showing that while poor bright kids fall behind their less intelligent more affluent fellow pupils when very young, they can make that up at university and later. “University may be the first stage of the process where educational attainment, as determined by class, can actually reverse and poorer students can excel.” The new indicators will not be legislated for, meaning they can’t bind the hand of future governments – germane given the use of the indicators will only truly be felt over years – but it would be difficult for a future government to jettison the exercise. The government is at pains to point out that the drive for greater social mobility includes an attempt to improve the life chances of not just the absolutely poorest but also those on median incomes. In Washington on Wednesday David Willetts joint-chaired a session with Biden’s director of economics, Jared Bernstein, to look at what has happened as living standards have either flattened or declined. The British politicians are also impressed by mechanisms American universities have used to increase the number of poor children going on to university with the University of Texas reserving 10% of its places for the state’s brightest but poorest. Willetts praised the scheme but said that because the government did not control the admissions process of British universities it couldn’t be replicated. Instead, he pointed to similar schemes being launched around the country where Russell group universities are identifying kids doing well at GCSEs from state schools and offering them places on condition they commit and engage to extra work in the meantime. Willetts said they were to be encouraged. He did however say that as a principle it should not be one the right is afraid of: “The [Texas] programme suggests the caricature of leftwing social engineering but I don’t regard Texas to be a hotbed of leftwing socialism.” The day before, when taking part in a Q&A in Mexico City with students, in Spanish, Nick Clegg was heckled by a student Jesus Romo over his role in increasing tuition fees in the UK. University challenge Nick Clegg hoped for a break 6,000 miles away from Westminster, where his name is synonymous with increasing tuition fees, but even in a country with no fees there was no respite. No sooner had he embarked on a question and answer session with students in Mexico City than he was challenged over the government’s plan to treble tuition fees to £9,000 a year. Jesus Romo, 18, told Clegg he wanted to study in Britain next year but now had misgivings. “Given that your government seems to be saying that you cannot afford to educate your own population, do you really think it is going to be appropriate for us Mexicans to be taking up places in your universities?” he asked . Clegg told Romo his question was “not a particularly objective” one. The student told reporters that the government would not have got away with such a policy in Mexico. He said: “It is insane to think people are going to be able to pay back those sums. If he really wants more people from poorer backgrounds to go to university then those students should not have to worry about paying out huge sums.Otherwise they will not come.” After talks with Clegg the Mexican president, Felipe Calderón, suggested that British students unable to afford UK universities should come to Mexico. “We hope young British men and women will come here to take advantage of our universities,” he said. Nick Clegg David Willetts Education policy Social mobility Equality United States Allegra Stratton guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Chuck Schumer Caught on Tape Instructing Fellow Dems on How to Spin Media, Networks Ignore

New York Senator Chuck Schumer was caught on tape Tuesday instructing his Democratic colleagues on how to spin the media with regard to “extreme” Republicans and their budget cuts. “I always use extreme…That is what the caucus instructed me to use,” Schumer blurted. The liberal senator was apparently unaware his comments were being recorded (The remarks were made moments before a conference call with reporters began.) Tuesday’s nightly newscasts on NBC, ABC and CBS all skipped the story. On Wednesday, Good Morning America, Today and Early Show did the same. The New York Times' Caucus blog explained: After thanking his colleagues — Barbara Boxer of California, Benjamin L. Cardin of Maryland, Thomas R. Carper of Delaware and Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut — for doing the budget bidding for the Senate Democrats, who are facing off against the House Republicans over how to cut spending for the rest of the fiscal year, Mr. Schumer told them to portray John A. Boehner of Ohio, the speaker of the House, as painted into a box by the Tea Party, and to decry the spending cuts that he wants as extreme. “I always use the word extreme,” Mr. Schumer said. “That is what the caucus instructed me to use this week.” Other journalists at the Times seemed to follow the proper wording. In a March 30 op-ed entitled “Why We're Fasting,” food writer Mark Bittman portrayed the Republicans as willing to “starve” poor Americans “to death”: “I stopped eating on Monday and joined around 4,000 other people in a fast to call attention to Congressional budget proposals that would make huge cuts in programs for the poor and hungry….These supposedly deficit-reducing cuts — they’d barely make a dent — will quite literally cause more people to starve to death, go to bed hungry or live more miserably than are doing so now. And: The bill would increase defense spending.” While ABC’s GMA found no time for Schumer and his planned spin for journalists, the ABC program did cover breast-feeding dolls and whether it’s “too much too soon.” CBS’s Early Show featured a former girlfriend of the late JFK Jr. She informed viewers that kissing him was “magical.” NBC’s Today covered a conversation between two babbling babies. — Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center. Click here to follow him on Twitter .

Continue reading …
Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder — Let Them Eat Cake

Click here to view this media Apparently Michigan’s Governor Rick Snyder is doing his best not only to trash his state’s economy, but also to inflict as much pain as humanly possible on the poor and unemployed there while he’s at it. Michigan whacks unemployment benefits, other states seek same ‘devil take the hindmost’ approach : With the official jobless rate still hovering around 9 percent and the real damage a good deal higher than that, states have been spending a lot of money—borrowed federal money to the tune of $45.9 billion—on unemployment compensation benefits. Having implied or stated outright that these government payments make laid-off workers lazy, several Republican governors and Republican-led legislatures want to avoid or at least reduce their obligations to pay such benefits. Michigan leads the pack. Governor Rick Snyder signed into law Monday a cut in future benefits from the nationwide standard of 26 weeks to 20 weeks beginning in January 2012. Representative Sander M. Levin (MI-12) called the law a reckless move that could harm hundreds of thousands of workers. “It turns the clock back 50 years at a time when unemployment is at historic highs since the Depression,” he said. “I think that Michigan should not be to unemployment insurance what Wisconsin has become to collective bargaining.” Snyder claims he wants to focus on jobs instead of joblessness. A clever bit of propaganda that will no doubt have a lot of tax-cutting involved. In fact, besides putting the screws to those alleged bon bon-eating, cable-watching layabouts, the key impetus behind the new law is that it would reduce in the future how much employers pay into the state’s unemployment fund. And as Rachel Maddow discussed with CEPR’s Dean Baker , a conservative think tank, Mackinac Center For Public Policy has also targeted her with some of their over-the-top FOIA requests. Conservative Think Tank Seeks Michigan Profs’ Emails About Wisconsin Union Battle … And Maddow : A free enterprise think tank in Michigan — backed by some of the biggest names in national conservative donor circles — has made a broad public records request to at least three in-state universities with departments that specialize in the study of labor relations, seeking all their emails regarding the union battle in Wisconsin, Gov. Scott Walker (R-WI) and MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow, TPM has learned. One professor subject to the FOIA described it as anti-union advocates “going after folks they don’t agree with.” The Mackinac Center For Public Policy , based in Midland, Mich., submitted the FOIA requests last Friday and Monday to the Labor Studies Center at the University of Michigan and the Douglas A. Fraser Center for Workplace Issues at Wayne State University. A third FOIA was directed to Michigan State University, which has a School of Human Resources & Labor Relations . The requests specifically seek emails from all labor studies faculty at each school. The Mackinac Center For Public Policy describes itself as a “nonpartisan research and educational institute” focused on providing free market “solutions to state and local policy questions” in Michigan. The center does not disclose its donors but according to recent reporting by Mother Jones , Mackinac “is part of a network of state-based groups associated with the Heritage Foundation.” Marick Masters, director of the labor studies program at Wayne State and also subject to a Mackinac Center FOIA, says he’s never seen anything like it. “I’ve been an educator since early 1980s and I’ve never had a FOIA request,” he said. Masters declined to speculate on the nature of the request, saying only that “everyone is entitled to file a FOIA request” and that he’s forwarded the request to the university’s general counsel, who’ll decide if and how to comply with it. Maddow’s name in the list of requested emails came as a surprise. “Some days my job is weirder than others,” she told TPM. Zullo said it sounds to him like labor studies professors are becoming the latest pawns in the fight between conservatives and labor that has heated up since January, when a slew of tea party-backed Republican governors were sworn in around the country. “This is a way that they’re going after folks they don’t agree with, I suppose,” Zullo said. “I see it just simply as part of the political environment we exist in right now.” Past major donors to Mackinac Center, according to Mother Jones , have included the Charles G. Koch Foundation, the Walton Family Foundation (the Wal-Mart Waltons), and foundations tied to two of Michigan’s best-known and wealthiest conservative political families: the DeVos family of Amway fame and the Prince family of Blackwater fame.

Continue reading …
NPR: ‘Get Tough’ Texas GOP No Longer ‘Welcoming’ of Illegal Immigration

NPR's Wade Goodwyn noticeably minimized the presence of anti-illegal immigration conservatives from Texas on Tuesday's All Things Considered. Goodwyn tilted towards so-called ” welcoming ” and ” tolerant ” Republicans in the state by a three to one margin, and gushed over the ” thousands of illegal immigrants building neighborhoods ” during the ” Hispanic-friendly ” term of then-Governor George W. Bush. Host Michelle Norris set the biased tone in her introduction for the correspondent's report: “In Texas, the Republican Party is changing tack on illegal immigration. The relatively welcoming, tolerant attitude embraced by George W. Bush when he was governor is waning. It's been overtaken by a flood of Arizona-style get-tough measures . Nearly 100 immigration bills have been written or filed in the current legislative session.” Goodwyn trumpeted how ” Texas is now more than ever in the nation's conservative vanguard, and among its most conservative leaders is House Representative Leo Berman from northeast Texas, around Tyler.” He continued by acting as if distance from the border mattered in the illegal immigration debate: “Though Berman's district is about as far from the Mexican border as you can get and still be in Texas, he's leading the charge on immigration.” After playing two sound bites from Rep. Berman and noting some of the other anti-illegal immigration proposals in the Texas state legislature, the NPR reporter gave his positive spin about Bush's years as governor: GOODWYN: This is a significant change in strategy for the Texas GOP. In the mid-'90s, Texas Republicans watched as their party in California went on an anti-illegal immigration crusade and lost control of the state. But in Texas, the economy was booming ; the suburbs of Dallas, Houston, Austin, and San Antonio were exploding; and thousands of illegal immigrants sat astride 2-by-4s, nail guns in hand, building those neighborhoods . (audio clip of radio ad in Spanish) So, Governor Bush and his man Karl Rove crafted a different strategy from their California colleagues: Hispanic-friendly . UNIDENTIFIED MAN 1 (from political ad for then-Governor George W. Bush): Used to be, I just pulled the lever Democrats. These days, I look for the person with a good record who believes what I believe: hard work, family, responsibility: George Bush. GEORGE W. BUSH: I appreciate that and I agree. That's why I'm working hard to make sure all our children can succeed, and I need your vote to continue. GOODWYN: The result? In 1998, George W. Bush crushed his Democratic opponent, getting nearly half the Hispanic vote, a triumph that placed him on the path to the presidency one year later. The young governors of Texas and Florida learned their early political style at their father's knee. Not only was he a former president of the United States, he was a Texas oilman, and for generations, those independent oil producers, along with farmers and Texas ranchers, have employed i nexpensive, hard-working Mexican laborers . Goodwyn followed this turn to the past with three sound bites from one of the current advocates for illegal immigration in Texas, playing up his Republican credentials, all the while hinting that much of the state GOP has become extreme: GOODWYN: … In the halls of the Texas Capitol in 2011, Bush's approach is considered insufficiently conservative by most Republicans . The one powerful interest group that still thinks Bush had it right is the Texas Association of Business. BILL HAMMOND, TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS: In Texas, if suddenly, all of the undocumented workers were simply to go back to their home of origin, it would be disastrous for the Texas economy. GOODWYN: Bill Hammond is the president of the Texas Association of Business. It is no exaggeration to say his membership supplies the Texas Republican Party a large measure of its fiscal lifeblood . He has lots of friends here. On behalf of his clients, the thousands of big and small-business owners in Texas, Hammond is roaming the Capitol, trying to impart a bit of reality about the Lone Star State's economy . HAMMOND: The impact on this Texas state economy of immigrant labor is about $17 billion a year. That's an enormous segment of our economy, and we simply would not be able to function without these people. GOODWYN: Until this year, Hammond and his Republican allies in the Texas legislature have been able to kill most immigration bills in committee. Hammond would like to expand the immigration pipeline, to allow more workers to legally enter the state. That proposal currently has zero chance. HAMMOND: Today, 56 percent of Texans under the age of 25 are minorities. The growth in the population has been largely Hispanic over the last 10 years. I believe the Republican Party is throwing away their future. As if these three clips weren't enough, the correspondent turned to one of Rep. Berman's pro-illegal immigration colleagues in the Texas House, a Latino Republican whose district borders Mexico: TEXAS STATE REPRESENTATIVE AARON PENA: The tone of the debate is basically saying, we don't want you. This is a war over our culture. These people bring diseases into our country. GOODWYN: House Representative Aaron Pena is a Republican who represents Hidalgo, on the border. There are six Hispanic Republicans in the Texas House, and Pena says they've been trying to convince some of their colleagues to tone down the anti-Hispanic rhetori c. PENA: Many times, you won't see our handiwork out in public. It's done behind the scenes. GOODWYN: Pena says there are plenty of Texas Republicans who quietly share his concerns about the tone of the debate and its long-term effect on Hispanic voters. At the end of his report, Goodwyn played one more sound bite from Rep. Berman, and all but suggested that the issue of illegal immigration was just a side issue: BERMAN: Most Hispanics right now do vote Democrat. There's no question about it. So, what vote are we going after? We're going after a vote that doesn't vote Republican anyway. GOODWYN: It's too early to tell how many of the 100 bills will become law. If the Texas House is hot for immigration bills, the Texas Senate seems less so. It's distracted by a $27 billion budget deficit that's threatening to gut the state . On March 18, NPR's Mara Liasson completely omitted conservatives who are opposed to “comprehensive” immigration reform” during her report on Utah's “milder” immigration measures. While one might credit Goodwyn for at least finding one anti-illegal immigration conservative for his report, both his and Liasson's report perpetuate their taxpayer-funded network's reputation for liberal bias. — Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center. You can follow him on Twitter here .

Continue reading …
Miss Marple reverses ageing process

Jennifer Garner, 38, has been cast as the elderly Agatha Christie sleuth for a new Disney series. But Miss Marple is not the only TV character who has got younger . . . Personally, I have no problem with Jennifer Garner, the voluptuous 38-year-old American actress who portrayed a glamorous, basque-clad ninja assassin in the 2005 film Elektra, playing Agatha Christie’s dowdy, aged sleuth Jane Marple . But a few traditionalists have made predictable points about her not being quite right for the part, and they are also exercised by the havoc Twin Peaks writer Mark Frost may wreak on Miss Marple’s sleepy home village of St Mary Mead when he transplants it to small-town America. Christie does appear to have imagined her creation as elderly, describing her as “rather like some of my grandmother’s cronies – old ladies whom I have met in so many villages where I have gone to stay as a girl”. Margaret Rutherford was 70 when she defined the role on screen in the 1960s; Joan Hickson, generally reckoned to be the definitive Miss Marple, was in her mid-80s when she made the last of her TV adaptations. But it’s that word “definitive” that may explain why Disney, which has bought the rights to Christie’s novels, feels it has to re-imagine the character. No one can out-Marple Hickson. If that’s your idea of Miss Marple – birdlike, tweedy, superficially faltering but in reality razor-sharp – buy the set on DVD. Screen incarnations of well-known figures, real and imagined, generally seem to be getting younger. Think of Jonathan Rhys Meyers’s recent TV portrayal of Henry VIII not as a fat bloke with a taste for capons, but as a sexy young man who would be perfectly at home in a boy band. Or the way the ageing, beak-nosed, pipe-smoking Sherlock Holmes of Basil Rathbone has given way to the whizzy Benedict Cumberbatch. And of course the evolution of Doctor Who from professorial ancient to floppy-haired art student. Some will suggest this recasting is simply a matter of our cult of youth. But ignore those siren voices, often older actors moaning about their lack of job opportunities. A time lord, by definition, can be any age; Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes started solving crimes straight after university; Henry VIII was young and virile once (albeit briefly); and even Miss Marple aged in the 40 years during which the books appeared, though there is admittedly little evidence that she ever spent time in Washington State. I like to believe the re-moulders of these much-loved characters are motivated by art, not money, by a ceaseless quest to give new meanings to our collective mythos . And I do think Jennifer Garner could look very good in a felt hat. Television Doctor Who Stephen Moss guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …