Officials stopped outspoken artist at Beijing airport this morning and police have surrounded studio China’s best-known artist Ai Weiwei has been detained at Beijing airport this morning and police have surrounded his studio in the capital. The 53-year-old, who designed the Olympic Bird’s Nest stadium, has been an outspoken critic of the government. Although he has previously experienced harassment by officials, he appeared to be relatively protected by the status of his late father, a renowned poet, and his high international profile; last year, he created the Sunflower Seeds installation for Tate Modern. His detention comes amid a wider crackdown on activists and dissidents , which human rights campaigners describe as the worst in over a decade. At least 23 people have been detained, mostly in relation to incitement to subversion or creating a disturbance. Three more have been formally arrested and more than a dozen are missing, including high profile human rights lawyers. Ai was due to fly to Hong Kong for business this morning, but was detained at immigration on his way out of Beijing. An officer told an assistant who was travelling with him that the artist had “other business” and could not board the plane. Between 15 and 20 uniformed and plain clothes police surrounded his studio in Caochangdi, in the north of the capital, and more were believed to be searching it. Power to the neighbourhood was cut off. Men who appeared to be plainclothes police grabbed the phone of a Guardian journalist who took a photograph of the scene and deleted the image. A uniformed officer told the reporter: “You are not allowed to be on this street. You must leave.” One resident said: “I went outside to see what was going on and saw a lot of police…I cannot understand it. What has he done?” Officials visited Ai’s studio three times this week, saying they wanted to check that staff there – particularly foreigners – were registered correctly. But his assistant said Ai appeared to have no particular concerns prior to his detention today. Ai’s mobile was not available and telephones at his studio rang unanswered. Posts about Ai on the popular Weibo microblog were deleted. Twitter users reported that Ai’s friend Wen Tao had been detained by police in Caochangdi. Shortly beforehand, replying to a friend enquiring whether he was all right, he had tweeted: “So far, so good”. Wen’s mobile was not available. Beijing police said they did not know anything about either man. Asked about Ai, an airport police spokesman said: “I do not have the obligation to tell you the information. You may have got your information wrong; even if it is right, you have to go through certain procedures to make inquiries, not just make a phone call.” Earlier this week it emerged that Ai was setting up a studio in Berlin because of his increasing work in Europe. But he told the Guardian that it would take at least two years to build the space and he would probably divide his time between Europe and China. He said the situation in Beijing was “difficult” and added: “It is hard to know what will happen in a few years. “I will never leave China behind unless I am forced to….Hopefully that is not going to happen.” Last year Ai was placed under house arrest after saying he would hold a party to mark the forced demolition of his studio in Shanghai. In December he was prevented from leaving the country. Many dissidents had their movements restricted at the time because of the government’s fears that people would attend the Nobel peace prize ceremony for jailed writer Liu Xiaobo. Ai also complained he was twice assaulted by police in Sichuan, south west China. Nicholas Bequelin, Asia researcher for Human Rights Watch, said: “This crackdown has not bottomed out yet. “We are still in this process of weeding out any government critics, with no end in sight.” He added: “Ai Weiwei has been a bit of an outlier and the harassment against him has been more and more intense in the past few months. “But I think the signal it sends is that if he can be arbitrarily harassed in this way, no one is safe.” China Ai Weiwei Human rights Tania Branigan Jonathan Watts guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …enlarge Ayn Rand — Tea Party icon, but not sure why. Click here to view this media Ayn Rand has become something of a resuscitated icon of late, certainly within the ranks of the Tea Party who have embraced her Extreme Capitalist and Anti-Government theories with almost romantic fervor. In 1971, as part of the Comment series on NBC , Rand was asked to deliver an essay on her views regarding the Ecology movement. Ayn Rand: “Ecology is the war on abundance, fought by the same people who are fighting the war on Poverty. The Ecologists claim that local pollution affects the whole world and threatens the survival of all living species. There is no scientific proof of this claim and none has ever been offered, on the grounds of nothing but arbitrary projections and panic mongering slogans, the ecologists are urging mankind to commit suicide by paralyzing industrial production. Their immediate but not ultimate goal is the destruction of the last remnants of freedoms of capitalism in our mixed economy and the establishment of a global dictatorship. In order to protect our natural environment, this means to enslave mankind on order to protect weeds, birds and reptiles.” Her views were, at best, extreme and she has certainly not been without her detractors, nor fans in high places. Alan Greenspan has claimed to be a great follower of her ideals. That she paints everything in the most dire and dystopic of terms probably speaks more to her Russian background than anything else. As was once pointed out, her style was reminiscent of “philosophy as it’s written in the Soviet Union” and has been challenged, debunked and left quietly as an antique of history over the years, until recently. History is forever astonishing and baffling and it’s jammed with contradictions, just like Ayn Rand.
Continue reading …enlarge Ayn Rand — Tea Party icon, but not sure why. Click here to view this media Ayn Rand has become something of a resuscitated icon of late, certainly within the ranks of the Tea Party who have embraced her Extreme Capitalist and Anti-Government theories with almost romantic fervor. In 1971, as part of the Comment series on NBC , Rand was asked to deliver an essay on her views regarding the Ecology movement. Ayn Rand: “Ecology is the war on abundance, fought by the same people who are fighting the war on Poverty. The Ecologists claim that local pollution affects the whole world and threatens the survival of all living species. There is no scientific proof of this claim and none has ever been offered, on the grounds of nothing but arbitrary projections and panic mongering slogans, the ecologists are urging mankind to commit suicide by paralyzing industrial production. Their immediate but not ultimate goal is the destruction of the last remnants of freedoms of capitalism in our mixed economy and the establishment of a global dictatorship. In order to protect our natural environment, this means to enslave mankind on order to protect weeds, birds and reptiles.” Her views were, at best, extreme and she has certainly not been without her detractors, nor fans in high places. Alan Greenspan has claimed to be a great follower of her ideals. That she paints everything in the most dire and dystopic of terms probably speaks more to her Russian background than anything else. As was once pointed out, her style was reminiscent of “philosophy as it’s written in the Soviet Union” and has been challenged, debunked and left quietly as an antique of history over the years, until recently. History is forever astonishing and baffling and it’s jammed with contradictions, just like Ayn Rand.
Continue reading …enlarge Credit: The Professional Left Time for your weekly podcast with The Professional Left, otherwise known as our own Driftglass and Bluegal and congrats on winning the scholarship for Netroots Nation this year. You can listen to the archives or make a donation to help these going at http://professionalleft.blogspot.com/ . Enjoy the podcast and have a great weekend everybody. Related links for this week’s podcast: The Florida Uterus story Eric Cantor thinks he can pass a bill all by himself.
Continue reading …enlarge Credit: The Professional Left Time for your weekly podcast with The Professional Left, otherwise known as our own Driftglass and Bluegal and congrats on winning the scholarship for Netroots Nation this year. You can listen to the archives or make a donation to help these going at http://professionalleft.blogspot.com/ . Enjoy the podcast and have a great weekend everybody. Related links for this week’s podcast: The Florida Uterus story Eric Cantor thinks he can pass a bill all by himself.
Continue reading …enlarge Is it just me, or has anyone else noticed that America’s top economists are running around with their hair on fire ? (Or whatever passes for it with economists.) Nobel Prize winner Joe Stiglitz in Vanity Fair sounds the alarm about growing economic inequality in America. I wonder if anyone in a position to do something about it is listening? America’s inequality distorts our society in every conceivable way. There is, for one thing, a well-documented lifestyle effect—people outside the top 1 percent increasingly live beyond their means. Trickle-down economics may be a chimera, but trickle-down behaviorism is very real. Inequality massively distorts our foreign policy. The top 1 percent rarely serve in the military—the reality is that the “all-volunteer” army does not pay enough to attract their sons and daughters, and patriotism goes only so far. Plus, the wealthiest class feels no pinch from higher taxes when the nation goes to war: borrowed money will pay for all that. Foreign policy, by definition, is about the balancing of national interests and national resources. With the top 1 percent in charge, and paying no price, the notion of balance and restraint goes out the window. There is no limit to the adventures we can undertake; corporations and contractors stand only to gain. The rules of economic globalization are likewise designed to benefit the rich: they encourage competition among countries for business, which drives down taxes on corporations, weakens health and environmental protections, and undermines what used to be viewed as the “core” labor rights, which include the right to collective bargaining. Imagine what the world might look like if the rules were designed instead to encourage competition among countries for workers. Governments would compete in providing economic security, low taxes on ordinary wage earners, good education, and a clean environment—things workers care about. But the top 1 percent don’t need to care. Or, more accurately, they think they don’t. Of all the costs imposed on our society by the top 1 percent, perhaps the greatest is this: the erosion of our sense of identity, in which fair play, equality of opportunity, and a sense of community are so important. America has long prided itself on being a fair society, where everyone has an equal chance of getting ahead, but the statistics suggest otherwise: the chances of a poor citizen, or even a middle-class citizen, making it to the top in America are smaller than in many countries of Europe. The cards are stacked against them. It is this sense of an unjust system without opportunity that has given rise to the conflagrations in the Middle East: rising food prices and growing and persistent youth unemployment simply served as kindling. With youth unemployment in America at around 20 percent (and in some locations, and among some socio-demographic groups, at twice that); with one out of six Americans desiring a full-time job not able to get one; with one out of seven Americans on food stamps (and about the same number suffering from “food insecurity”)—given all this, there is ample evidence that something has blocked the vaunted “trickling down” from the top 1 percent to everyone else. All of this is having the predictable effect of creating alienation—voter turnout among those in their 20s in the last election stood at 21 percent, comparable to the unemployment rate. In recent weeks we have watched people taking to the streets by the millions to protest political, economic, and social conditions in the oppressive societies they inhabit. Governments have been toppled in Egypt and Tunisia. Protests have erupted in Libya, Yemen, and Bahrain. The ruling families elsewhere in the region look on nervously from their air-conditioned penthouses—will they be next? They are right to worry. These are societies where a minuscule fraction of the population—less than 1 percent—controls the lion’s share of the wealth; where wealth is a main determinant of power; where entrenched corruption of one sort or another is a way of life; and where the wealthiest often stand actively in the way of policies that would improve life for people in general. As we gaze out at the popular fervor in the streets, one question to ask ourselves is this: When will it come to America? In important ways, our own country has become like one of these distant, troubled places. Alexis de Tocqueville once described what he saw as a chief part of the peculiar genius of American society—something he called “self-interest properly understood.” The last two words were the key. Everyone possesses self-interest in a narrow sense: I want what’s good for me right now! Self-interest “properly understood” is different. It means appreciating that paying attention to everyone else’s self-interest—in other words, the common welfare—is in fact a precondition for one’s own ultimate well-being. Tocqueville was not suggesting that there was anything noble or idealistic about this outlook—in fact, he was suggesting the opposite. It was a mark of American pragmatism. Those canny Americans understood a basic fact: looking out for the other guy isn’t just good for the soul—it’s good for business. The top 1 percent have the best houses, the best educations, the best doctors, and the best lifestyles, but there is one thing that money doesn’t seem to have bought: an understanding that their fate is bound up with how the other 99 percent live. Throughout history, this is something that the top 1 percent eventually do learn. Too late . Sounds like a bit of an implied threat there, Joe! Of course, predicting something is often confused with a recommendation…
Continue reading …With its white tiles and gold trim, Yotam Ottolenghi’s Nopi is like a glitzy bathroom – with fabulous food on tap Nopi, 21-22 Warwick Street, London W1 (020 7494 9584). Meal for two, including wine and service £110 I stared down the long, shiny dining room of Nopi, Yotam Ottolenghi’s new, flash, rather grown-up restaurant, named a little clumsily for its position North Of Piccadilly. All those white splash-back tiles. The glossy marble floors. The gold-trimmed bar and sconces and the coat hooks. It reminded me of my Jewish brethren in Stanmore. Their bathrooms look just like this, although obviously theirs tend to be larger. It is all shiny and clean, from the lettering outside to the Arctic spread of blinding white paper tablecloths inside. If anybody has a
Continue reading …At the height of the Celtic Tiger, Irish investors snapped up property at home and abroad. Now they are desperate to sell and Russian buyers are ready to pounce Located in Dublin’s main tourist drag, Temple Bar, it would have fetched up to €250,000 at the height of the “Celtic Tiger” boom. But a studio flat in one of the busiest and best-known parts of the city is now on the market for just €80,000 – a staggering fall in value that encapsulates the dramatic collapse of Ireland’s property market. As the republic’s taxpayers try to make sense of the eye-watering costs of bailing out their country’s banks, with billions more being pumped into the ailing financial institutions last week, the “fire sale” of a luxury apartment on the left bank of the Liffey for such a low price indicates the decline in fortunes of an economy that invested too much too quickly in the building boom. Temple Bar is best known to British tourists as the location of lively, late-night venues – many staging traditional Irish music sessions, busy and often over-priced restaurants, buskers, street artists and an alternative culture scene. During the boom years it reflected the two sides of modern Ireland: creative but sometimes brash; youthful but at times menacing with stag and hen parties from abroad mingling in the streets with beggars and heroin addicts. The vacant €80,000 Temple Bar flat will go on sale at an auction later this month organised by property agency Allsop in what has become a buyers’ market. Other apartments in Dublin 1, the prime central location of the capital, are also up for grabs for between €100,000 to €180,000, all of them described in the auction’s promotion material as “investment” flats and properties. Buying to invest was one of the main reasons why the Irish economy and the nation’s finances are now in such a parlous state. Last Thursday, Ireland’s new Fine Gael–Labour coalition government published the results of stress tests on the republic’s big banks. The results made grim reading for ministers and the taxpaying public. As a result of the Irish banks’ ongoing losses, the state will have to put in an extra €24bn to recapitalise them; its capacity to do so is due in the main to the largesse of the European Central Bank and the International Monetary Fund. Overall, the final bill for saving these banks from collapse will be around €70bn. To put that into context, this means the expected final cost of re-financing the banks is more than double the entire tax take (including personal taxation, capital tax and VAT) across Ireland in 2010. The figure is also six times the amount the republic spent last year on its health service and eight times more than was allocated to primary, secondary and tertiary education. Patrick Honohan, the chairman of Ireland’s central bank, was clearly not exaggerating last week when he described the total injection of state cash as “one of the costliest banking crises in history”. A key factor in creating that crisis was the excessive and aggressive lending by banks to developers during the boom. Property makes up about 60% of the toxic loans in Ireland’s debt-ridden banks. Ordinary Irish citizens, too, played their part in the collective mania to make money fast by investing in bricks and mortar, and not only at home. It is estimated that as a result of years of economic expansion,, at least one in 10 Irish citizens now owns at least one property abroad. Many of these investors remortgaged, sometimes more than once at home, to obtain holiday apartments, villas and even farmland in locations as far flung as Bulgaria and South America. Earlier this year, one Irish investor walked into the Dublin-based foreign property company Extrasales Consulting hoping to sell an landholding investment he had bought during the Celtic Tiger years in Paraguay. “He had 288 acres of Paraguayan land that he had originally bought for $900,000 [about £560,000],” recalled Extrasales’s director, Ger Nunan. “The land is now worth around $450,000 but he was still desperate to sell.” Nunan’s company is located in one of Dublin’s grand Georgian houses on the south side of the city centre. Today it specialises almost exclusively in helping Irish investors offload their foreign assets. As they face negative equity, going into mortgage arrears and the possible repossession of their houses and businesses in Ireland, there has been a rush to sell off overseas land and homes. A true picture of the Irish over-reach when it comes to property investments can be seen in holiday destinations along Bulgaria’s Black Sea coast or the Turkish Aegean, as well as in traditional tourist areas such as southern Spain. During the good times, Celtic Tiger man and woman colonised the Mediterranean, east and west, rapidly and enthusiastically. “In the Sunny Beach resort in Bulgaria there are reckoned to be about 10,000 Irish-owned properties, while in places in Turkey like Mahmutlar the locals call it ‘Irish town’,” said Nunan’s colleague, Colin Horan. “Nowadays, we see owners with properties there coming in desperate to sell.” Like the luxury Temple Bar flat going for a song, Irish foreign properties are going up for sale in holiday destinations from the Costa del Sol to the Florida coastline. And the buyers’ market for Irish-owned homes has found a new investor – the Russians. “Cash is king in the downturn,” said Nunan. “The Irish owners need cash to pay off their debts at home and the Russians want to take cash out of their own country to buy abroad.” Since the downturn, Extrasales has been receiving up to 10 calls a day from Irish people desperate to sell to save their homes and businesses. In response, the company has tapped into the growing Russian middle class, which trusts neither their government or their own banks. “We have set up 26 agents in six cities across Russia who are selling Irish foreign properties to Russian buyers,” Nunan said. “Our average Russian client is not taking out a 40% to 50% mortgage like Irish investors did in Spain. They buy outright, often with cash. They are buying for life – for them it’s a lifelong investment. It’s not what we all did during the Celtic Tiger years.” Ireland bailout Housing market Ireland Henry McDonald guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Jockey who defied cancer to win world’s greatest steeplechase and inspire a movie explains his love of Aintree and the battle to stay healthy 30 years on from his finest hour Idea for a movie. A jockey who is told he will be dead in eight months unless he signs up to treatment with a 35-40% success rate wins the Grand National on a horse who was so badly injured in one of his races that the vet suggested a bullet was the only answer. Too late. Already been done. John Hurt played the rider in a 1983 film. But the tale kept rolling after Bob Champion passed the Aintree finishing post on Aldaniti, 30 years ago this week. It kept going into a new realm of illness, and defiance, and a fund-raising drive against cancer that provided Champion with a second act in life to surpass the first. We are in the kitchen of the yard in Findon, West Sussex, where Aldaniti was trained by Josh Gifford to defy outlandish odds. The 1981 National winner was a talented ex-crock who had restored his Aintree candidacy by trotting up at Ascot in a major trial. Champion had been ravaged by an early form of chemotherapy and was lucky still to be alive, never mind jumping Becher’s Brook. He looks healthy now: nowhere near his 62 years. But to get to Liverpool on Saturday, for the Bob Champion Aintree Legends Charity Race, in which a dozen National-winning ex-jockeys will compete, Aldaniti’s former partner had to survive a second heart attack three weeks ago: 10 years to the day, spookily, after his first. As soft rain falls on the Downs where Nick Gifford took over from his father, Josh, Champion updates his story: “I speak on cruise ships a bit, and I’d come back from Barbados to a really busy week. I went to Stafford that night for the cancer trust, then to a meeting in London, then down to Hove to a dinner, then up to Whitby, then Harrogate. I was knackered when I got home. “A couple of days later I was at home in bed at one o’clock in the morning and had these chest pains. I knew what it was. Thankfully. I had some spray from the first heart attack but I’d never used it. It was 10 years out of date. I sprayed it under my tongue and that saved a lot of damage. “I’ve got a couple of stents [artificial tubes] in there now and the surgeons ballooned the other vessels. It was the same day I had the heart attack 10 years ago – so I’m not going to go to bed in 10 years’ time. I might go and park outside the hospital.” Champion attributes his heart trouble to the effects of his treatment after being diagnosed with testicular cancer in July 1979: “The chemo was very barbaric in those days and it did affect my lungs. There’s no way I can say it gave me the heart attack but some of the vessels were injured by the treatment in those days. I’m alive, that’s the main thing. I wouldn’t have been without the treatment.” Hurt’s character was living the life in a previous golden generation of National Hunt riders. People talk these days of a special crop – AP McCoy, Ruby Walsh and the rest – but Champion’s contemporaries were also vivid figures on winter’s landscape. “I rode with some really good jockeys. People like John Francome, Jonjo O’Neill, Ron Barry, Bob Davies: all great champions,” he says. “Racing’s changed. AP has more than a thousand rides a year. John Francome – fantastic jockey – was lucky if he got 400. They’ve got to be fitter now – or they should be. They’re more professional. We enjoyed life. But they’re at it seven days a week. They’re breathalysed. They can’t really let themselves go on a Saturday night. We’d have a Saturday night out.” But all this crashed with the cancer diagnosis. Jump racing steeled itself to say goodbye. Gifford, though, delivered a psychological gift, promising Champion his job as stable jockey would be waiting for him, even though he doubted that would be the outcome. “They gave me six to eight months to live. If I’d had the cancer 18 months before there’d have been no cure anyway, so I’d have been a goner,” Champion says. “It was eight months to live – or a 35-40% chance of living, with the treatment. The odds weren’t particularly good. I didn’t want to die. But I didn’t realise until they started pumping the stuff in how toxic it was. Jesus, I felt so ill after two days. It was horrendous treatment. Thankfully now we’ve gone from 35-40% to 95% on testicular cancer alone [with early diagnosis]. So that’s how far we’ve come. “Some days you’d rather be dead. I got septicaemia half-way through the treatment. You think you’re drifting away and feel relief. Then they change your blood, get you up and you start the whole thing all over again. “Josh always said my job was there. I know he never really thought I’d live. But he kept giving me the confidence, which I needed. I started riding out when I came out of hospital, but I couldn’t breathe. My lungs had been damaged and the weather was cold, which made it hurt more; so I went to the States, to South Carolina, where the weather was nice and warm. It made things easier. I spent eight months there.” Champion’s first post-cancer winner was on the Flat in Florida in May, 1980, but resuming over jumps in Britain was gruelling, and peppered by setbacks. But by Christmas, Champion was back in the groove. He had never given up on Aldaniti as a National contender, despite the animal’s two serious tendon injuries and fractured hock. He says: “He was a horse I’d always said would win a National one day. I’d been associated with horses who had gone on and won Nationals. I won the Eider Chase on Highland Wedding before he won at Aintree. I rode Rag Trade in his first race over fences. I used to look after Rubstic, who won a National. They all gave me this same feel. They had a low head carriage, were well balanced and were all good jumpers. “He [Aldaniti] broke down so many times. The last time it happened, at Sandown, it was very bad and the vets wanted to put him down. But he was such a great patient. He stood in a box for six months in plaster. That’s hard for a horse. After that Nick Embiricos [his owner] did all the road work. He came back into the yard on 1 January and Josh rode him out every day himself. He thought it was the only way he was going to get him to Liverpool. Josh has terrific hands, because the old horse used to pull very hard. If Josh hadn’t ridden him every day he might not have got there. “When the old horse went to Ascot for the Whitbread Trial he was 16-1 but he absolutely bolted up. He never came off the bridle. I thought – if he’s as good as that on the day, that’s good enough for the National, in my book. He went from 66-1 for the National to 14-1 so he must have been pretty impressive.” Champion refers to Aldaniti as “the old horse” a lot. Their lives, even now, are inseparable. In the race, Aldaniti, a 10-1 shot, beat Spartan Missile, ridden by an amateur, Mr John Thorne, who was killed a year later in a point-to-point. Even in its aftermath the 1981 Grand National was redemptive and tragic by turns. “From the moment I went by the post everything seemed to change in my life – for good and bad, I suppose,” Champion says. “I was still a professional jockey, though. I had to ride in a race an hour later. Part of the job. And I’m glad I did. It should have won, but it didn’t. “Every time I tried to have a glass of champagne the press took it off me for the photograph. The first drink I had was a can of Coke on the motorway going back. Made up for it the next night, though.” Champion trained for a while but his cancer trust became more consuming: “I don’t know how long we believed it would go for, but it got bigger, and we’ve got our own research laboratory, which has been very successful. Our next target is prostate. One in 10 men get prostrate cancer now and hopefully we’ll come up with the goods there.” After the race 30 years ago Champion and Aldaniti stayed together: “I used to see him regularly because he did so much for the cancer trust. Holyrood Castle, Buckingham Palace. He used to go up in the lift at big stores. Terrific temperament. He was wonderful with the public – a nice kind horse who loved the attention.” Aldaniti died of a heart attack in 1997, aged 27. This is one of those National stories (the greatest of them all, to this day) that expresses the full human and equine grandeur of the challenge. The contest itself is a metaphor for what Aldaniti and Champion overcame to be there in the first place, never mind win. No wonder he is almost ever-present on Grand National day: “I’ve only missed one in 40 years – and that was because I had the first heart attack, 10 years ago. I rode in 10. I love going up there. I always walk down to The Chair. It brings back memories. I love the Liverpool people. They go there and they enjoy themselves. “That’s what I like to see.” The Bob Champion Cancer Trust is at bobchampion.org.uk Horse racing Grand National Paul Hayward guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …