Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 1463)
Pair arrested in phone hacking case

Police search homes of paper’s chief reporter and former news editor as CPS and police row over failure of first inquiry Scotland Yard’s inquiry into allegations of phone hacking by the News of the World took a dramatic turn on Tuesday as the paper’s chief reporter, Neville Thurlbeck, and its former assistant editor Ian Edmondson were arrested on suspicion of conspiring to intercept mobile phone messages. Thurlbeck and Edmondson were arrested after voluntarily presenting themselves at different police stations in south-west London. Both men were later released on police bail to return in September. Their homes, as well as Thurlbeck’s office and computer at the News of the World head offices, were searched by police. It is believed Edmondson, who was sacked from the News of the World in January, and Thurlbeck have been implicated in the long-running scandal through documents seized from Glenn Mulcaire, the private investigator employed by the newspaper. Both Edmondson and Thurlbeck deny any wrongdoing. In another major development, Keir Starmer QC, the director of public prosecutions, directly challenged the accuracy of evidence given to parliament by John Yates, the acting deputy commissioner of the Metropolitan police. Yates has repeatedly claimed there were only 10 or 12 victims of the affair, but evidence has emerged that police in 2006 knew of “a vast number”. Yates has told parliamentary inquiries four times that he used the lower number because prosecutors advised police to adopt a very narrow interpretation of the law, but in a detailed letter to the chairmen of two select committees, Starmer contradicted Yates’s account of the legal advice, insisting that prosecutors “did not limit the scope and extent of the criminal investigation”. The Labour MP Chris Bryant said Yates should now “consider his position” at the Met. The DPP’s letter was greeted by fury at Scotland Yard. His claim that police did not dispute the facts in his letter, setting out the timeline of legal advice given to detectives investigating phone hacking, left top officers “very, very angry”. In recent days, each side has been describing the other in increasingly vitriolic terms, bandying around words such as “disingenuous” and “lying” in private. Such a vitriolic and sustained dispute between senior officers and prosecutors is unprecedented, say sources in both organisations. The News of the World until recently insisted that the only phone hacking carried out on behalf of the paper was by a “rogue reporter”, Clive Goodman, and the only other arrests linked to the long-running saga took place in 2006, when Goodman, the News of the World’s former royal editor, and two associates were arrested. In January 2007, Goodman was given a four-month jail term and Mulcaire a six-month term for plotting to intercept voicemail messages left for eight public figures. Suppressed evidence of further phone hacking was not revealed until a Guardian investigation in July 2009. Operation Weeting, which is responsible for Tuesday’s arrests, is the third investigation into hacking run by Scotland Yard. Previous investigations failed to act on evidence that they obtained in 2006. So far six reporters and executives have been publicly linked to the phone-hacking practice. In December, lawyers for the actor Sienna Miller obtained papers that implicated Edmondson in the hacking of her and eight of her friends and family. Thurlbeck’s name was brought into the affair through an email that was disclosed to a select committee by the Guardian in July 2009 in which a News of the World reporter sent the transcript of 35 voicemails “for Neville”. In another separate development, Vodafone agreed to hand over call data relating to Miller, following a legal ruling that could set a precedent for other public figures suing the paper over allegations of phone hacking. The Met hopes Tuesday’s arrests will prove to the public that the phone-hacking scandal is now being aggressively investigated. It hopes the arrests will allow a distance to be drawn between itself and the original investigation, which was heavily criticised. Deputy Assistant Commissioner Sue Akers, leading the new investigation, reportedly told one alleged victim, John Prescott, she was “not satisfied” with the original inquiry. “Whatever the police did before on this investigation is water under the bridge. The new operation is doing a good, thorough job. If that shows that someone in the past did a bad job, then so be it,” a source close to the inquiry said. The arrests are also, the source claimed, proof that the operation is flourishing despite being under considerable pressure. The team of 45 full-time detectives – more than triple the number deployed to investigate illegal expenses claims by MPs – is having to review all actions and decisions taken by the previous investigation. News International said in a statement: “News International has consistently reiterated that it will not tolerate wrongdoing and is committed to acting on evidence. We continue to co-operate fully with the ongoing police investigation.” How the case unfolded December 2005 Buckingham Palace asks police to investigate interference with mobile phone messages. April 2006 CPS lawyer suggests police may need to adopt a narrow view of the law but adds “this area is very much untested and further consideration will need to be given”. She also advises that the Computer Misuse Act could be used without any ambiguity. June 2006 Police send file to the CPS confirming they are working with Computer Misuse Act as well as Ripa. 28 July 2006 David Perry takes over as prosecuting counsel and advises CPS that Ripa is unclear and there is no need to take a view on its narrow interpretation unless defence raises it. 8 August 2006 Goodman and Mulcaire are arrested and charged with offences under Ripa. October 2006 Goodman and Mulcaire plead guilty without questioning how Ripa should be interpreted. March 2011 John Yates gives evidence to select committees, quoting early advice from CPS but not later advice from David Perry. Amelia Hill Nick Davies Vikram Dodd guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

I wish everyone would go read the rest of this, because these are the exact same tactics that will be used here against Americans, should a real democratic movement get large enough to be a threat to the corporations: This government isn’t scared of mass vandalism. The public, however, is – and that is precisely why fistfuls of images of young people in masks smashing up the Ritz and throwing smoke bombs have been tossed at our screens for five days now. The state requires us to be fearful so that it can acquire our consent for its spending cuts, and the public fears disorder even more than it fears mass unemployment and the decimaton of public services. So perhaps we shouldn’t be surprised that the images of officers of the law assaulting unarmed young people, and the images of riot cops arresting an entirely peaceful protest group on orders which are rumoured to have come right from the top, have largely been been overlooked or dismissed. Meanwhile, UKUncut – a group whose modus operandi is inclusive, creative, defiant people power of the type that really does scare the government – has been brutally suppressed. A hundred and thirty eight members have been detained, including a fifteen year old girl who was so frightened in jail that she was made to sign a form excusing the police from culpability, should she go on to commit suicide . There has been very little public outcry. The next wave in the battle for the hearts and minds of the British public has truly begun.

Continue reading …
Glenn Beck [hearts] Paul Ryan and Ryan responds in kind: ‘I Love You Too’

Click here to view this media Crazy loves crazy. Guess where, after announcing his wondrous plan to destroy Medicare as we know it, Paul Ryan headed for one of his first stops of the day. Yep, you guessed it — Glenn Beck and his radio show. In the opening of their discussion about Ryan’s insanely destructive plan, Beck fawns all over him because he does love to destroy working-class families and the poor. Paul responds in kind. Dontcha just feel the manlove? BECK: Paul Ryan, you sir, you sir, I love you. RYAN: I love you too. … BECK: You know, you’re from Wisconsin. you know who’s involved with these unions. They are communist, socialist, and revolutionary … What can you do to shut these revolutionaries down? RYAN: Well, ultimately we have to win elections. Beck and Ryan agree not only that they love each other, but that progressives and union members are the true cancer of society. Did you know we’re revolutionaries now too? David Brooks wrote a feeble column that ran today in the NYT attempting to make Ryan’s proposals sound serious. Republicans are emboldened to put out as much crazy legislation as they can because the result is that American people will become numb to the amount of insanity that is being transmitted by the Tea Party politicians and the media at large. I’m sure all of C&L’s readers know that the Beltway media will proclaim Ryan as “courageous” and “bold” for releasing his nonsense, and Beck was his an important stop on his Destroy America Tour. Look, even some progressives are losing their minds at what Ryan has released today; Does the Ryan budget make Simpson-Bowles look better? No. Thanks mcjoan. Digby reminds us from a year ago that Ryan and Beck are best buddies and hated progressives back then: She did more transcribing: GLENN BECK: Nice to meet you, sir. Tell me, tell me your thoughts on progressivism. PAUL RYAN: Right. What I have been trying to do, and if you read the entire Oklahoma speech or read my speech to Hillsdale College that they put in there on Primus Magazine, you can get them on my Facebook page, what I’ve been trying to do is indict the entire vision of progressivism because I see progressivism as the source, the intellectual source for the big government problems that are plaguing us today and so to me it’s really important to flush progressives out into the field of open debate. GLENN: I love you. PAUL RYAN: So people can actually see what this ideology means and where it’s going to lead us and how it attacks the American idea. GLENN: Okay. Hang on just a second. I ‑‑ did you see my speech at CPAC? PAUL RYAN: I’ve read it. I didn’t see it. I’ve read it, a transcript of it. GLENN: And I think we’re saying the same thing. I call it ‑‑ PAUL RYAN: We are saying the same thing. GLENN: It’s a cancer. PAUL RYAN: Exactly. Look, I come from ‑‑ I’m calling you from Janesville, Wisconsin where I’m born and raised. GLENN: Holy cow. PAUL RYAN: Where we raise our family, 35 miles from Madison. I grew up hearing about this stuff. This stuff came from these German intellectuals to Madison‑University of Wisconsin and sort of out there from the beginning of the last century. So this is something we are familiar with where I come from. It never sat right with me. And as I grew up, I learned more about the founders and reading the Austrians and others that this is really a cancer because it basically takes the notion that our rights come from God and nature and turns it on its head and says, no, no, no, no, no, they come from government, and we here in government are here to give you your rights and therefore ration, redistribute and regulate your rights. It’s a complete affront of the whole idea of this country and that is to me what we as conservatives, or classical liberals if you want to get technical. GLENN: Thank you. This is the serious, gutsy, courageous intellectual who has the fatuous gasbags drooling and genuflecting. Ryan is an “intellectual” the same way Beck is an “intellectual.” They both believe that progressivism is a cancer that’s plaguing the country and that it’s really important to flush it out. I think he may have succeeded in doing that today. I’m just not so sure he’s going to succeed in killing it in the long run. It’s just possible that most people don’t see old age pensions and health care as being quite the disease on the body politic that Ryan does. It’s making me sick watching the gasbags on TV today and their positive reaction to Ryan’s plan; I know it’s going to carry into the night and the next day. But if you can understand anything about Paul Ryan, understand that he and Beck are sympaticos, a mutual-admiration society. That says it all.

Continue reading …
Salon’s Alex Pareene Misleads Readers with Story on Christian College Receiving More Per Year Than Public Broadcasting

“Evangelical Liberty University received half a billion dollars in federal aid money: One conservative college got more government cash than NPR last year.” That's the misleading headline for Alex Pareene's April 5 War Room blog post at Salon.com. Adding insult to inaccuracy, Pareene slandered the late Jerry Falwell — without a link to corroborating evidence — as an apartheid supporter and bigot (h/t Matt Cover): Liberty University, the evangelical private Christian school founded by dead apartheid-supporting bigot Jerry Falwell, received $445 million in federal financial aid last year. The Corporation for Public Broadcasting, by the way, received $420 million from the federal government.

Continue reading …
Real Madrid 4-0 Tottenham Hotspur

Real Madrid had so much in their favour already that it was cruel to see them also outnumber Tottenham Hotspur, who saw Peter Crouch dismissed after a quarter-of-an-hour. José Mourinho’s team would surely have come out on top in any case, but the margin is such that the return with the La Liga club is one that the White Hart Lane support can enjoy merely for whatever sense of occasion survives. The fourth goal, two minutes from the end, was struck by Cristiano Ronaldo from an angle on the right and the fact that Heurelho Gomes ought to have saved it added to the forlorn tone. The dismantling of Tottenham was underway in advance of the game itself. Aaron Lennon was taken unwell before kick-off, with the vacancy in the line-up filled by Jermaine Jenas. The latter’s sense of privilege lasted for the four minutes it took for Mourinho’s side to take the lead. A deep corner from the right saw Emmanuel Adebayor elude Jenas for a header that Luka Modric could not stop from crossing the line. If there was group sloppiness then, it was an individual aberration that brought a handicap of another sort in the 15th minute. Crouch, already booked for a foul on Sergio Ramos, attempted a tackle near the opposition’s penalty area and felled Marcelo. The red card from the German referee Felix Brych was unavoidable. Tottenham were thorough in their bid for self-destruction. Real were not exactly rampant and it was as if they had decided that patience was their wisest approach when time was expected to take its toll of Tottenham. The nature of the fixture was epitomised in the 41st minute, as the left-back Marcelo displayed even more adventure than normal as he set up an opportunity for Adebayor. The striker, on loan from Manchester City, cut far more eager figure than had been witnessed at Eastlands and the great opportunity at this club seemed to galvanise him. It took far more willpower to lift Tottenham. The absence of Lennon had produce an odd reaction from Harry Redknapp, with the manager initially putting Gareth Bale to work on the right. The obvious danger to Real, beforehand at least, had been he impact of the Welshman from the left. In the group phase Internazionale had not been able to prevent him running free on that flank at San Siro, even with Brazil’s Maicon at right-back. It was to be expected that Mourinho, of all managers, would have a better scheme, particularly since he takes such a special pride in his pragmatism. As it was, it took a while before Bale was switched to his natural setting. The midfield showed dash, but the circumstances meant that he was then earning his side a moment to catch their breath rather than terrorising Mourinho’s men. Given the nature of the game, the accent was on resistance. An Angel di María drive came off the arm of Michael Dawson rushed towards him, but no penalty was awarded. In those opening 45 minutes, the spirit of Tottenham in adversity was impressive and also professional since they had the calm to realise that restricting Real here might create optimism for the return leg. The side was ready for defiance. William Gallas had recovered from a knee injury to re-establish the partnership with Dawson that had done so much to nullify Milan in the last 16 tie. The return of the Frenchman was all the more since the opposition’s commitment to attack. Mourinho may have spoken of a goalless draw being a serviceable result for Real, yet the team selection said otherwise. There were even two wingers in Di María and Cristiano Ronaldo. The latter, of course, cannot be encapsulated in so simple a job description and he was expected by Mourinho to cause a great variety, particularly since his accompanist, Marcelo, was also fit after all the pre-match evasiveness on the subject. Tottenham knew better than to be passive in the face of the threat. Redknapp’s introduction of Jermain Defoe for Rafael van der Vaart at the start of the second half embodied the outlook. There was no lack of spirit from the visitors, who broke purposefully through Bale and Defoe in that period, and they took encouragement from an occasional lack of cohesion when Mourinho’s men were trying to set up a shooting opportunity for one another. Ronaldo even raised his arms to call for animation from the crowd a moment before he tapped a corner to Marcelo, and so had a minor part in helped Real increase the lead after 57 minutes. The left-back crossed and Adebayor was unaccompanied as he placed a meticulous header into the net. Tottenham struggled on, with Gomes tipping over the bar an Adebayor header that would have completed a hat-trick. The former Arsenal striker was deemed to have done sufficient damage and Mourinho replaced him with Gonzalo Higuaín. There was little clemency of any sort for Tottenham on this evening though, and Di María’s wonderful angled strike for the third compounded the gloom. Champions League Real Madrid Tottenham Hotspur Kevin McCarra guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Libyan rebels deny Lockerbie offer

British lawyer claims revolutionary leadership apologised for Libyan role in Pan Am and IRA bombings Libya’s revolutionary administration has denied a claim by a British lawyer representing victims of IRA attacks and the Lockerbie bombing that it has apologised for Libya’s involvement and offered compensation. Following a meeting with the rebel council’s leadership in Benghazi, Jason McCue, head of the Libya Victims Initiative, read a statement which he said was an “unequivocal apology” for Libya’s provision of Semtex used in IRA bombings and the blowing up of the Pan Am flight. McCue said the revolutionary council had agreed to pay compensation along the lines paid out in a deal between Muammar Gaddafi and the US government which provided $10m for a death and $3m for a serious injury. He said there was also agreement to set up a trust for other victims. McCue said the apology and offer of compensation was in the name of chairman of its interim governing council, Mustafa Abdul Jalil. But Abdul Hafiz Ghoga, its deputy chairman, said McCue’s claims were “not true”. “We didn’t apologise ourselves. We regret what happened, the catastrophic event of Lockerbie, and we will do our best to reach the truth with the families of Lockerbie. Also for the IRA. We emphasised to the British government that we will work to overcome what has happened. But there was no apology. We are not responsible,” he said. Ghoga said that the council “didn’t negotiate anything about compensation”. “We want to know the truth. We will help the families of the victims to get to the truth,” he said. However, separately, the council said that it would “co-operate fully” to establish what had happened in the Lockerbie attack “and the right of the victims’ families for justice”. Mustafa Gheriani, a council spokesman, was equally clear in his denial that an apology was made. He said they council had expressed sorrow but that Gaddafi was responsible and that it is he who should apologise. “When we say sorry it means we did it. But we did not do it. Gaddafi did it. It’s sorrow not an apology,” he said. The council noted that if it wished to issue an apology in Jalil’s name it would not ask a British lawyer to read it. Libya Lockerbie plane bombing Middle East Global terrorism UK security and terrorism Scotland Chris McGreal guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
US government in budget deadlock

Obama and Republican House Speaker fail to agree details on how £33bn cuts to government spending can be made The US federal government faces a shutdown from Saturday after the White House and the Republican-led House failed to reach an agreement on Tuesday on budget spending cuts. Barack Obama met the House Speaker, John Boehner, at the White House but the two were unable to bridge differences. Obama, speaking afterwards at a press conference, said the two were closer than ever before over the amount of cuts, but he blamed politics and ideology for the continued differences. If there is no deal by Friday, the shutdown in federal services will start the following day. The armed forces and emergency services will not be affected, but there will be disruption to such things as payments to military veterans, passport applications, visits to national parks and monuments and loans to small businesses, Obama said. The Democrats and Republicans are locked in a battle over last year’s budget. Obama told the press conference that he had agreed to the $33bn (£20bn) in cuts originally sought by Boehner, but that the speaker was quibbling about the details. The main disagreement is not over the figure but where the cuts should be made: the Republicans want reductions that would hit both Obama’s healthcare plans and the environmental protection agency. Obama and Boehner both held press conferences, intent on trying to avoid the blame for a shutdown. “The American people do not like these games,” Obama said, calling on his Republican opponents to behave like grown-ups and reach a compromise. Boehner said there was no agreement because the $33bn cuts proposed by the White House were smoke and mirrors. “There was no agreement reached so those conversations will continue,” Boehner said. Boehner is under pressure from a new Republican intake in the House who owe their victories to the Tea Party movement which campaigned for deep cuts in federal spending. Obama offered to hold further meetings on Wednesday and Thursday with Boehner. It has been 15 years since the last US shutdown, during the Clinton administration. In a separate development, the Republicans introduced their spending plan for the future, one that would cut the federal deficit by $5.8tn over the next decade, compared with the $1tn Obama is proposing. The Republican budget has no chance of being implemented, with Obama in the White House and the Democrats in charge of the Senate. The Republican cuts would come from healthcare and tax reforms. US politics Barack Obama Republicans Democrats Tea Party movement United States US economy Economics Ewen MacAskill guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
US government in budget deadlock

Obama and Republican House Speaker fail to agree details on how £33bn cuts to government spending can be made The US federal government faces a shutdown from Saturday after the White House and the Republican-led House failed to reach an agreement on Tuesday on budget spending cuts. Barack Obama met the House Speaker, John Boehner, at the White House but the two were unable to bridge differences. Obama, speaking afterwards at a press conference, said the two were closer than ever before over the amount of cuts, but he blamed politics and ideology for the continued differences. If there is no deal by Friday, the shutdown in federal services will start the following day. The armed forces and emergency services will not be affected, but there will be disruption to such things as payments to military veterans, passport applications, visits to national parks and monuments and loans to small businesses, Obama said. The Democrats and Republicans are locked in a battle over last year’s budget. Obama told the press conference that he had agreed to the $33bn (£20bn) in cuts originally sought by Boehner, but that the speaker was quibbling about the details. The main disagreement is not over the figure but where the cuts should be made: the Republicans want reductions that would hit both Obama’s healthcare plans and the environmental protection agency. Obama and Boehner both held press conferences, intent on trying to avoid the blame for a shutdown. “The American people do not like these games,” Obama said, calling on his Republican opponents to behave like grown-ups and reach a compromise. Boehner said there was no agreement because the $33bn cuts proposed by the White House were smoke and mirrors. “There was no agreement reached so those conversations will continue,” Boehner said. Boehner is under pressure from a new Republican intake in the House who owe their victories to the Tea Party movement which campaigned for deep cuts in federal spending. Obama offered to hold further meetings on Wednesday and Thursday with Boehner. It has been 15 years since the last US shutdown, during the Clinton administration. In a separate development, the Republicans introduced their spending plan for the future, one that would cut the federal deficit by $5.8tn over the next decade, compared with the $1tn Obama is proposing. The Republican budget has no chance of being implemented, with Obama in the White House and the Democrats in charge of the Senate. The Republican cuts would come from healthcare and tax reforms. US politics Barack Obama Republicans Democrats Tea Party movement United States US economy Economics Ewen MacAskill guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Clegg admits parental job boost

Deputy prime minister owns up to securing his first internship through his father’s influence in a Finnish bank Nick Clegg was forced to admit it was “wrong” that his own career had been boosted by parental connections when he was starting out, getting him time at a bank and his first job in politics. The revelation that the deputy prime minister had been helped by his father’s influence cast a shadow over the government’s announcement of a drive to end unpaid internships. As the government put more accessible internships in desirable professions at the centre of a drive to give poorer children better opportunities, it also emerged that eight coalition MPs were continuing the practice of employing unpaid interns. An anonymous intern also said he had worked for Nick Clegg in opposition. A new national internship scheme is intended to get young people into professions otherwise closed to all but those who know people in the field or “your father’s friends”, in Nick Clegg’s words. Clegg also wants to encourage people to use national minimum wage legislation to shop employers who are taking advantage of free and eager young workers. The government pointed to an announcement by the Tory chairman, Lady Warsi, that they were leading by example in closing down the civil service to all informally arranged slots of work experience from 2012. In the morning when launching the policy, the deputy prime minister was asked by Labour MP John Spellar in the Commons whether he could confirm he had secured his first internship through his father’s influence in a Finnish bank. Clegg told the house: “Yes, I can. As a teenager, yes, I did receive an internship, as, I suspect, did many people around the chamber. “Good for you if you did not. All of us should be honest and acknowledge that the way that internships have been administered in the private sector, the public sector, political parties and – I discovered when we came into government – in Whitehall as well, under 13 years of Labour, left a lot to be desired. “I was a recipient of that, as, I suspect, many others here were as well. That is what we need to change if we want to secure greater social mobility in the future.” Afterwards, at the press conference to launch the document, Clegg was asked whether it was true his father had secured him a job at the European commission through a conversation with his neighbour, former foreign secretary Lord Carrington. Clegg said: “The whole system was wrong. I’m not the slightest bit ashamed of saying that we all inhabited a system which was wrong.” Included as part of the policies is a “business compact” being signed with large companies – including the Guardian – that they seek to provide fairer access to their workplaces. Clegg asked employers to pay at least the appropriate national minimum wage or payment of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. They should encourage schools and blind applications in the hope the best qualified will be accepted. The government also launched its child poverty strategy, putting on a statutory footing a new child poverty and social mobility commission which will enshrine in law a body to monitor the progress made by this government and future ones towards eliminating child poverty by 2020. Seven indicators at different stages of the life cycle will be monitored by different Whitehall departments to see if they help or hinder social mobility. Asked about his own party’s policy on internships, Clegg said he had just set out a new set of rules. Lib Dem interns will now receive travel expenses and up to £5 for lunch, though many questioned whether that was feasible. Eight coalition MPs and three constituency parties were advertising for unpaid interns as Clegg announced the policy. The website working4anMP currently lists unpaid intern vacancies with the Conservative MPs Aidan Burley, David Davis, David Amess, Mark Menzies and Dominic Raab, and the West Thurrock constituency Conservative party. Lib Dem MPs advertising for an unpaid intern included David Ward and John Leech, along with the Bristol and Lewes constituency Lib Dem parties. A former unpaid intern for Nick Clegg, Jonny Medland from Oxford told the group Intern Aware he had “worked on all sorts of projects – drafting articles to appear in the local and national press, researching policy announcements from the then Labour government and making notes for speeches in the Commons. It definitely wasn’t ‘work experience’ but was exactly the sort of work which the coalition is now, rightly, insisting you should be paid for”. A survey conducted this year by the parliamentary branch of Unite revealed that half of MPs from the main parties are offering work experience without paying expenses. Nick Clegg Unemployment Apprenticeships Allegra Stratton Graham Snowdon guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Clegg admits parental job boost

Deputy prime minister owns up to securing his first internship through his father’s influence in a Finnish bank Nick Clegg was forced to admit it was “wrong” that his own career had been boosted by parental connections when he was starting out, getting him time at a bank and his first job in politics. The revelation that the deputy prime minister had been helped by his father’s influence cast a shadow over the government’s announcement of a drive to end unpaid internships. As the government put more accessible internships in desirable professions at the centre of a drive to give poorer children better opportunities, it also emerged that eight coalition MPs were continuing the practice of employing unpaid interns. An anonymous intern also said he had worked for Nick Clegg in opposition. A new national internship scheme is intended to get young people into professions otherwise closed to all but those who know people in the field or “your father’s friends”, in Nick Clegg’s words. Clegg also wants to encourage people to use national minimum wage legislation to shop employers who are taking advantage of free and eager young workers. The government pointed to an announcement by the Tory chairman, Lady Warsi, that they were leading by example in closing down the civil service to all informally arranged slots of work experience from 2012. In the morning when launching the policy, the deputy prime minister was asked by Labour MP John Spellar in the Commons whether he could confirm he had secured his first internship through his father’s influence in a Finnish bank. Clegg told the house: “Yes, I can. As a teenager, yes, I did receive an internship, as, I suspect, did many people around the chamber. “Good for you if you did not. All of us should be honest and acknowledge that the way that internships have been administered in the private sector, the public sector, political parties and – I discovered when we came into government – in Whitehall as well, under 13 years of Labour, left a lot to be desired. “I was a recipient of that, as, I suspect, many others here were as well. That is what we need to change if we want to secure greater social mobility in the future.” Afterwards, at the press conference to launch the document, Clegg was asked whether it was true his father had secured him a job at the European commission through a conversation with his neighbour, former foreign secretary Lord Carrington. Clegg said: “The whole system was wrong. I’m not the slightest bit ashamed of saying that we all inhabited a system which was wrong.” Included as part of the policies is a “business compact” being signed with large companies – including the Guardian – that they seek to provide fairer access to their workplaces. Clegg asked employers to pay at least the appropriate national minimum wage or payment of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. They should encourage schools and blind applications in the hope the best qualified will be accepted. The government also launched its child poverty strategy, putting on a statutory footing a new child poverty and social mobility commission which will enshrine in law a body to monitor the progress made by this government and future ones towards eliminating child poverty by 2020. Seven indicators at different stages of the life cycle will be monitored by different Whitehall departments to see if they help or hinder social mobility. Asked about his own party’s policy on internships, Clegg said he had just set out a new set of rules. Lib Dem interns will now receive travel expenses and up to £5 for lunch, though many questioned whether that was feasible. Eight coalition MPs and three constituency parties were advertising for unpaid interns as Clegg announced the policy. The website working4anMP currently lists unpaid intern vacancies with the Conservative MPs Aidan Burley, David Davis, David Amess, Mark Menzies and Dominic Raab, and the West Thurrock constituency Conservative party. Lib Dem MPs advertising for an unpaid intern included David Ward and John Leech, along with the Bristol and Lewes constituency Lib Dem parties. A former unpaid intern for Nick Clegg, Jonny Medland from Oxford told the group Intern Aware he had “worked on all sorts of projects – drafting articles to appear in the local and national press, researching policy announcements from the then Labour government and making notes for speeches in the Commons. It definitely wasn’t ‘work experience’ but was exactly the sort of work which the coalition is now, rightly, insisting you should be paid for”. A survey conducted this year by the parliamentary branch of Unite revealed that half of MPs from the main parties are offering work experience without paying expenses. Nick Clegg Unemployment Apprenticeships Allegra Stratton Graham Snowdon guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …