Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 1449)
Airports: where to park and

Airport parking is big business, with prices often in excess of the flights themselves. So it’s crucial you shop around for the cheapest deal possible The school holidays are nearly upon us, and with three bank holidays and the royal wedding within the space of 11 days many of us will be going abroad. But those lucky enough to be flying off may have to grapple with that perennial bugbear, airport car parking. Price check is this week looks at where to get the best prices, focusing on the peak holiday week of 16-23 April. We analysed prices at six UK airports on 6 April, for both leaving your keys with the parking attendant or taking them with you. As ever, Price check is not reviewing or recommending sites, merely finding the best available prices. We saw variances of as much as 40% between similar services, so it’s well worth hunting around, and booking more than 14 days in advance produces the best results. All codes quoted below are valid at least until 30 April. Readers should put their own findings in the comments section below. Keep checking gosimply.com and travelsupermarket.com , which update prices quite regularly. Edinburgh Airport The cheapest parking was £34.31 with Edinburgh Airport Park and Fly, using a 12% discount from VoucherCodes.co.uk and booking via SkyParkSecure . Using the same code and website you could also have got £36.07 at Edinburgh Secure Airparks Self Park. Gatwick You could have left your keys with Cophall Farm Parking for £49.60, or parked at the airport itself and kept your keys for £64.20. Also worth a mention is Diamond Parking Services at Gatwick, which was £51.04 via SkyParkSecure and the VoucherCode AW12ON. The company meet and greet you at an agreed point near the terminal entrance, and return it upon your return. Heathrow Notorious for its expensive parking, best price at Heathrow was £50.07 at the Radisson Edwardian Hotel using the SkyParksSecure 12% off code (see Edinburgh). The hotel will take your keys and your car may or may not be moved depending on the hotel’s parking requirements that week. Heathrow long stay car park was charging £78.20. Luton Best price was with BCP (0800 316 0169) quoting the 10% off VoucherCode WC68K, which cost £40.49, with you leaving the keys with them. London Luton mid- and long-term car parks were charging £54.99. Manchester Best price was £23.49 with CarparKing via gosimply.com , but it’s about 11 miles outside the airport with a free shuttle service. Nearer is First Response Parking , which was charging £28. Located less than two miles from the airport, you park your car and again get a shuttle bus. Stansted At Stansted, Looking4Parking had the best quote of £52 at Stansted Ardent Park and Go. Stansted’s own long-stay car park was £83 and you keep your own keys. Consumer affairs Saving money Air transport Budget travel Marc Lockley guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Airports: where to park and

Airport parking is big business, with prices often in excess of the flights themselves. So it’s crucial you shop around for the cheapest deal possible The school holidays are nearly upon us, and with three bank holidays and the royal wedding within the space of 11 days many of us will be going abroad. But those lucky enough to be flying off may have to grapple with that perennial bugbear, airport car parking. Price check is this week looks at where to get the best prices, focusing on the peak holiday week of 16-23 April. We analysed prices at six UK airports on 6 April, for both leaving your keys with the parking attendant or taking them with you. As ever, Price check is not reviewing or recommending sites, merely finding the best available prices. We saw variances of as much as 40% between similar services, so it’s well worth hunting around, and booking more than 14 days in advance produces the best results. All codes quoted below are valid at least until 30 April. Readers should put their own findings in the comments section below. Keep checking gosimply.com and travelsupermarket.com , which update prices quite regularly. Edinburgh Airport The cheapest parking was £34.31 with Edinburgh Airport Park and Fly, using a 12% discount from VoucherCodes.co.uk and booking via SkyParkSecure . Using the same code and website you could also have got £36.07 at Edinburgh Secure Airparks Self Park. Gatwick You could have left your keys with Cophall Farm Parking for £49.60, or parked at the airport itself and kept your keys for £64.20. Also worth a mention is Diamond Parking Services at Gatwick, which was £51.04 via SkyParkSecure and the VoucherCode AW12ON. The company meet and greet you at an agreed point near the terminal entrance, and return it upon your return. Heathrow Notorious for its expensive parking, best price at Heathrow was £50.07 at the Radisson Edwardian Hotel using the SkyParksSecure 12% off code (see Edinburgh). The hotel will take your keys and your car may or may not be moved depending on the hotel’s parking requirements that week. Heathrow long stay car park was charging £78.20. Luton Best price was with BCP (0800 316 0169) quoting the 10% off VoucherCode WC68K, which cost £40.49, with you leaving the keys with them. London Luton mid- and long-term car parks were charging £54.99. Manchester Best price was £23.49 with CarparKing via gosimply.com , but it’s about 11 miles outside the airport with a free shuttle service. Nearer is First Response Parking , which was charging £28. Located less than two miles from the airport, you park your car and again get a shuttle bus. Stansted At Stansted, Looking4Parking had the best quote of £52 at Stansted Ardent Park and Go. Stansted’s own long-stay car park was £83 and you keep your own keys. Consumer affairs Saving money Air transport Budget travel Marc Lockley guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Maurice Sendak returns

Where the Wild Things Are creator to publish Bumble-Ardy, the tale of a young pig’s birthday party, in September Let the wild rumpus begin! It’s been 30 years since his last one, but the 82-year-old Maurice Sendak has finally written and illustrated a new picture book. Sendak has written or illustrated a host of titles over his 60-year career, but the last book the Where the Wild Things Are author both wrote and drew was Outside Over There, the surreal story of a little girl whose baby sister is kidnapped by goblins, in 1981. Now Bumble-Ardy, the tale of a pig who, having reached the age of nine without ever having had a birthday party, decides to throw his own, is set for publication this September. Fans of Sendak’s best-known picture book, Where the Wild Things Are, in which Max travels in his wolf suit to the land of the wild things and becomes their king, are unlikely to be disappointed: the book sounds every bit as deliciously dark as its predecessors. Publisher HarperCollins promises Bumble’s party will be “a wild masquerade that quickly gets out of hand”, with the author once again exploring “the exuberance of young children and the unshakeable love between parent (in this case, an aunt) and child”. Sendak himself said in a recent interview that the pig “was funny … robust … sly … a sneak. He was all the things I like” . The story of Bumble-Ardy made its first showing as an animated segment for Sesame Street in the early 1970s , when Bumble was a boy rather than a pig. Sendak, who has sold almost 30m copies of his children’s books in the US alone, said he changed the character into a pig because “boys tend, generally speaking, to be pigs”, and also changed the partygoers’ drink of choice to brine rather than wine (“And just in time he asked some grubby swine to come for birthday cake and brine at ten past nine”). “I didn’t think I could get away with wine in this day and age,” he told the Wall Street Journal. Bumble-Ardy will be published in the US by HarperCollins on 6 September, with a first print run of 500,000. Details of UK publication have yet to be finalised. Susan Katz, president and publisher of HarperCollins Children’s Books, said she was “thrilled” to be publishing the picture book. “Generations have grown up with his books, and this new picture book is a true testament to Maurice’s matchless ability to delight, entertain, and surprise us with every one,” she said. Maurice Sendak Children’s books: 7 and under Publishing Alison Flood guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Save money? Close down the council

A council proposes a £600,000 summer break. Pickles talks rubbish. Villagers raise council tax to protect their library. • How to save a local authority £600,000: close down the council for a week . That’s the proposal (see paragraph 14) on the table at Hounslow council in west London (and due to be discussed with unions on Friday) as it grapples with £18m of spending cuts. The idea is on the face of it simple: the council already closes for a week at Christmas, so why not do it again in August? There are clear benefits, reckons the council: reduced summer holiday childcare costs for workers who have school age offspring, for example. And think of the bills: officers estimate it will save at least £5,000 on gas and electricity alone over the week. But where does the other £595,000 come from? That’s where it gets trickier. The period would count as unpaid leave for staff – equivalent to a pay cut of 1.92% – which as you’d expect has not gone down well (although there will be no formal “break in service” so it won’t affect pensionable pay, says the council). The few staff who will have to work over the closure period don’t escape the pay cut – they will have to take the unpaid leave at another time. There are other potential pitfalls: once they’ve exhausted the inevitable “will anyone notice” jokes, residents may not take kindly to the temporary closure of services they tend to take for granted. Not for nothing are officers worried about: “Negative publicity for the Council.” • Communities secretary and supposed uber-localist Eric Pickles is again getting worked up about – what else? – rubbish. This time it is Somerset’s new policy of charging £1.20 a time for householders to deliver their own waste to council tips. The charges were introduced by Tory-controlled Somerset county council to keep open four dumps otherwise due to close in the face of cuts of £300,000. Warning that it will create “perverse incentives that will lead to more fly tipping, Pickles promised the Daily Telegraph : “We will not allow municipal bureaucrats to introduce such backdoor bin charges for the collection or disposal of normal household waste.” But how will you not allow it, Eric, how? Will you bring down the iron fist of the central state on Somerset? As Steve Read, the managing director of Somerset Waste Partnership told the BBC : “It is not illegal, it is in the spirit of localism.” • More evidence of localism in action in the leafy parish of Aldbourne , near Marlborough in Wiltshire, where residents have voted to add an extra £7 to average council tax bills in order to protect services at the local library which were threatened by the cuts. Wiltshire council had proposed to replace local librarian Trish Rushen with a big society-style volunteer arrangement. But in a referendum residents voted 283-102 on a 26% turnout to stump up for the £5,400 savings themselves. Affluent Aldbourne’s decision perhaps should not be read as a barometer of the wider public’s preparedness (or ability) to support much-loved public services through what are effectively co-payments (or as a touchstone of its interest in big society experiments for that matter). But it is an interesting challenge to conventional political wisdom that no-one will ever, anywhere, vote to increase council tax. • It seems most local authorities have heeded ministerial exhortations to dip into their reserves to make ends meet in the Age of Austerity. Local Government Chronicle (LGC) correspondent James Illman reports today that 72% of councils are spending reserves [paywall]: over 30 expect to deploy upwards of over 30% of their stash, while Blackpool, Corby, Barnsley, Enfield, West Somerset, Essex Police Authority all forecast they will use up more than 50% of their rainy day fund in 2011-12. The LGC report doesn’t say, incidentally, what the reserves are being used for, or how much of it is being spent by councils on redundancy payments to staff made jobless by the cuts. I’ve blogged before on councils’ use of reserves (and why it is that wealthy Tory-controlled districts have the biggest war chests). I’ve also blogged on the incompetent attempts by Treasury chief secretary Danny Alexander to make reserves a party-political issue (this survey would appear to make that tactic even more of a nonsense). But what’s most interesting is the comments by Steve Freer, chief executive of the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountacy, who warns in the article that draining reserves now may not be entirely prudent given the pressures facing councils over the next few months: “There is almost a new need for reserves in the current climate. Authorities have put together budgets which have much higher levels of risk than usual. We are looking at budgets that have as many as 50 change projects in them. If one project gets blown off course that may not bring the authority down but if quite a few go off course that could have significant consequences.” • Back in February I blogged about Sefton council’s cuts consultation , which with commendable frankness prioritized all its services into four categories according to their perceived importance: critical, regulatory, frontline, and “others”. No service was immune from cuts, it pointed out, but it was clear that those that found themselves in the ominous-sounding “others” category were the most vulnerable. Since then Sefton has finessed the latter category even further, dividing it into three tiers. Services which find themself in the first tier, which includes libraries and leisure centres, are effectively given a stay of execution so long as they promise to find substantial savings. Tier two services (tourism, child and adolescent mental health) are given the lesser-of-two-evils treatment: safe, but your budget is cut by 50%. It’s worth keeping an eye on these two categories to see if they slip down a tier when the council comes back for more cuts next year. Finally, there are the condemned, poor and marginalised tier three services, for which nothing could be done. All have been unceremoniously axed, to save £3m. I’d love to know more detail about what has been lost through the cutting of these services, and what the consequences will be. Here they are: Pupil Attendance Under 8′s Service Contribution to Early Years Families and Schools Together (FAST) Surestart (Every Child A Talker) Continuing Education Post 16 Surestart (Dcatch programme) Music Service Other Courses Special Educational Needs Standards Grants Teenage Adolescent Mental Health Grant (TAMHS) Youth Opportunity Fund Keystage 4 Foundation Learning Public sector cuts Local government Public finance Patrick Butler guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Templeton prize gets atheists cross

It should be a happy story – top boffin gives correct answer to question: would you like £1m, no strings attached? Instead, a shower of abuse descends upon his head Good news for us slowcoaches this morning. Brilliant scientists at some of our great seats of learning, men whose lives are devoted to the rational pursuit of knowledge, turn out to be capable of as much intolerance and stupidity as the rest of us. What have they done this time? They’ve hurled abuse and reproach on Lord Rees of Ludlow – the astronomer royal and recent past president of the Royal Society – for accepting a £1m prize from a body called the Templeton Foundation , whose website you can check out here . Ian Sample’s chat with Rees is here , and Rees’s acceptance speech (all this happened on Tuesday) is here . “From big bang to big bucks”, as the headline writer wittily put it. It should be a happy story: top boffin gives correct answer to no-brainer question – “Would you like £1m, no strings attached?” – without having to phone a friend. Instead, a meteor shower of abuse descends upon his head. I’m more puzzled by this kind of abusive behaviour than I am surprised. Deep down, we all know that great men of science can be as petty and spiteful – Bill Bryson’s Short History of Nearly Everything sets it out with gusto – as politicians, footballers or captains of industry. Sir John Templeton (1912-2008) doesn’t sound like one of those, mind you. He was an American, a successful Wall Street investor ( here’s his bio ) who made a pile of money and set up his foundation to promote what the foundation’s slogan describes as “supporting science – investing in the big questions.” As far as I can see, there’s no suggestion he made his money as a crack dealer or a trader in sex slaves. What upsets part of the scientific community – needless to say, Oxford’s most militant atheist, Richard Dawkins, is part of the chorus – is their belief that Templeton, an enthusiastic Presbyterian, tries to blur the boundary between science and religion, making a virtue of belief without evidence. Well, well, that’s pretty serious. Belief without evidence, eh? I was having a drink only last night with a chap who left the pub early to go home and catch the Manchester United v Chelsea game. He did so in the evidence-free (and misplaced) belief that Chelsea would win. We all do things like that, don’t we? Rees himself declined to discuss the matter on Radio 4′s Today programme. But he did take issue with the Dawkinsites – “professional atheists” he called them – for risking the possibility that a pious young Muslim who is forced to choose between God and Charles Darwin will reject science in favour of faith. The enjoyably funny part of all this is that Rees himself admits to being a non-believer, albeit one who sometimes goes to church and has a good time there. He’s born and bred CoE and admires the gentle traditions of the Anglican church which are, incidentally, under attack from wild-eyed and intolerant evangelical Anglicans as well as from papists and atheists. All sorts of friends and colleagues are cross. Nobel laureate Professor Sir Harry Kroto writes in reproachful terms in today’s Times about how the sneaky Templeton folk “using enormous amounts of money as their lure” (well spotted, Harry) try to promote religion which he describes as “congenital wishful thinking”. To qualify for the prize, all you have to do is say there is no conflict between science and religion, protests the prof. He wants Rees to hand over the wonga to the British Humanist Association. I hope he doesn’t. What a waste! Take Lady R on a nice cruise, at the very least take her on a shopping spree in that nice new Cambridge mall before you do that, Marty. It’s true that dubious characters like Billy Graham and Mother Theresa have received the Templeton prize since its inception in 1974. But so, apparently, did the former Dominican priest and molecular biologist, Francisco Ayala, who advised Bill Clinton on how to overturn a law in his native Arkansas that would have allowed schools to teach creationism in science classes. I’d have thought that instance alone would have given Kroto and his kind cause for reflection. But no, Jerry Coyne, a University of Chicago biologist, says Templeton “wants to make faith a virtue”. They’re trying to protect Rees and impressionable souls from such wickedness. Apart from the fact that there is plenty of non-religious nonsense people can believe in – astrology, Chelsea FC, the Sun newspaper – I’d have expected the blowhards to have enough respect for Rees to let him sort this out unaided. He does hold the Order of Merit, one of the very few British honours still untainted by the usual stuff. If that wasn’t enough, you might think that heavyweight scientists might remember the intolerance that marked the history of their own trade in the modern era. From the 17th century until the 20th, they had to be wary of publishing conclusions which explicitly challenged the existence of a deity. You could lose your livelihood, or worse, if you were suspected of atheism. Surely we are not now so arrogant that we are tempted to reverse the proof? In any case, many of our greatest scientists – Darwin, Michael Faraday, Isaac Newton – were men of faith. If Newton, perhaps the greatest scientific mind in history, could reconcile faith and reason (“Gravity is God”) Rees should be able to sleep soundly, cheque in hand. Martin Rees Atheism Michael White guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
French forces in Ivory Coast rescue

Gbagbo fighters break into ambassador’s residence near presidential compound in Abidjan Fighting is continuing in Ivory Coast’s main city, Abidjan, as French helicopters target forces loyal to the incumbent president Laurent Gbagbo, who is holed up in the country’s presidential palace. French troops staged a rescue mission to airlift the Japanese ambassador to safety after Gbagbo supporters broke into his residence, according to the Japanese foreign ministry. The Japanese ambassador, Yoshifumi Okamura, and seven embassy employees sought refuge inside a safe room when Gbagbo fighters stormed the building and started firing from the roof with machine-guns and rocket-propelled grenades. The ambassador’s home is in the northern suburb of Cocody, near the presidential compound where Gbagbo’s troops are holding off forces loyal to the president-elect, Alassane Ouattara. Witnesses described a series of helicopter attacks near the compound in which at least one armoured vehicle was destroyed. The French troops, part of the UN peacekeeping mission in Ivory Coast, appear not to have targeted the compound itself, but the operation is likely to further raise concerns over France’s intervention in its former colony. Gbagbo, who blames France for supporting the north of the country in the 2002-03 civil war, accused President Nicolas Sarkozy on Wednesday of masterminding an “assassination plot” against him after Ouattara forces tried unsuccessfully to storm the presidential compound. A French armed forces spokesman, Thierry Burkhard, said the rescue operation was launched in response to a request from Japan and the United Nations. “The Japanese authorities asked the United Nations to act and Unoci [the UN mission in Ivory Coast] asked Licorne [French troops] as it has the means to evacuate,” he said. Burkhard said French troops returned fire after they were shot at, “destroying at least one armoured vehicle and two pick-up trucks”. No soldiers were injured but one of the Japanese officials was hurt. Before Wednesday’s assault on Gbagbo’s residence, French ministers had confidently predicted that he could cede power within hours, ending the west African country’s four-month crisis. A UN spokesman in New York said negotiations with Gbagbo’s camp were continuing, but it was not clear if they would lead anywhere. Gbagbo said on Wednesday he had no intention of stepping down. Gbagbo told the French TV channel LCI that his army had called for a ceasefire, not surrender. “I’m not a kamikaze,” he said by phone. “I love life. My voice is not the voice of a martyr, no, no, no. I’m not looking for death. It’s not my aim to die. “For peace to return to Ivory Coast, I and Ouattara, the two of us have to talk.” As the siege entered its third day, Abidjan residents trapped between the rival forces were desperately short of food and water. “The fighting is terrible here. The explosions are so heavy my building is shaking,” Alfred Kouassi, who lives near Gbagbo’s residence in the commercial capital, told Reuters. “We can hear automatic gunfire and the thud of heavy weapons. There’s shooting all over the place. Cars are speeding in all directions and so are the fighters.” Despite the fighting, civilians in the north of the city ventured outside to hunt for water and food. The streets were generally deserted save for these lone scavengers, many of whom walked with their hands in the air to show they were noncombatants. “We haven’t slept, we haven’t eaten, we’ve had nothing to drink,” said Mariam, 17, balancing a plastic container of water on her head and wearing a white T-shirt with the words “Obama Girl” emblazoned in black. “We are all going to die. Even the water we do get is dirty.” Other residents told Reuters they had walked 10 miles in their quest for drinking water. No one wanted to be out on the streets after a midday curfew imposed by Ouattara for fear of being taken for a pro-Gbagbo fighter. Even in the outskirts of Yopougon, one of Gbagbo’s strongest inner-city bastions, there were demands for him to step down – perhaps not surprising given the nearby presence of patrolling Ouattara troops who seized this neighbourhood on Monday. Ibrahim Cisse, 29, said: “We are just waiting for him to go. It’s Alassane who we are banking on now.” Rubbish was piling up in mounds by the roadside and decaying corpses identified by locals as pro-Gbagbo militiamen remained uncollected. “Tell the people the smell is going everywhere,” 21-year-old Lassane Kone told Reuters. Cash machines are empty, shops are shut and supplies are running out. Public services are paralysed, with ambulances unable to travel in case they are fired on. Those in need of medical attention have nowhere to turn. A war economy has sprung up rapidly. Mariam said the price of atieke – the ground manioc which is one of the staples of the Abidjan diet – had tripled in the space of a few days. At a Ouattara base camp nearby, groups of women circulated between soldiers selling packets of atieke and little sachets of frozen fruit juices. “We are selling a bit so we can eat,” said one vendor. Ivory Coast Laurent Gbagbo Alassane Ouattara France United Nations David Smith Selay Kouassi Haroon Siddique guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Billingsgate: theft in a City state

The same authority that hosted the bank crisis is taking away Billingsgate fish porters’ livelihoods This week the City of London Corporation is likely to withdraw all trading licences from the porters of Billingsgate fish market . The role of the porter has been recognised by the corporation since 1632: it was to uphold the ethics of the fish market, work honestly and “act in fellowship” with other porters. Take away the porters’ licences, and they become cheap casual labour – and if employed at all it will be by individual merchants rather as porters, licenced by corporation as a whole. The corporation, as the inheritor of property titles going back 1,000 years , fears that the market – and specifically the porters – stand in the way of its expansion plans around Canary Wharf. Without the porters, the bankers, property developers and financiers will be the sole inheritors of the ancient privileges, customs, rights and assets that go back to the establishment of the City of London almost a millennium ago. It is the final act in a story where the power of money has been asserted over the status of the people. It is a disgrace that shines a light on our failure to control finance capital even after the crisis of autumn 2008, yet nobody says a

Continue reading …
Fledgling pimp, militant radical … American icon

Fledgling pimp, militant radical, Islamic convert . . . black activist Malcolm X was no stranger to controversy. Now a new biography explodes the myths that obscure the man The shot that killed Malcolm X in February 1965 as he stood on a podium in New York tore through his chest and resounded around the world. The talisman for black America was lifeless as supporters wheeled his body towards the hospital closest to the Audubon Ballroom, where he had just begun the night’s oration. An ambulance had been called. None came. But even at that stage, Malcolm X was already thwarting the hopes of those who took his life to curtail his influence; and the authorities whose silent complicity assisted the murder. None among the conspirators in the Nation of Islam (NoI), who spent months plotting his demise, could have predicted that anyone would be talking about Malcolm X 46 years on. Neither could the FBI, whose operatives listened in on his conversations. Who knew that the man they viewed as the most dangerous in America could enjoy such longevity? The legend peaks and troughs and every few years enjoys a kick-start. First the classic autobiography in conjunction with Alex Haley , hailed by Time magazine as one of the 10 most influential non-fiction books of the 20th century . Followed by lionisation by the Black Power movement. Then, decades later, his adoption by the giants of hip-hop as a symbol of black pride and non-conformity. And now Malcolm X is the subject of a new warts-and-all biography that took 12 years to write and prompts fresh reflection on the man white America feared above all others. It’s another kick-start, even if it does take the Malcolm we know from Haley’s book into places Malcolm X wouldn’t have wanted it to go. Manning Marable, an academic and respected authority on black America, doesn’t use his book Malcolm X: A Life in Reinvention , to destroy the reputation of the man who told the heartlands that the assassination of President Kennedy represented “chickens coming home to roost”. But, over 487 pages, Marable does effectively destroy the cultivated brand. There is a wealth of detail, some of it new, some of it old stories confirmed, all aided by documents and new recollections from the US government, the FBI and the Nation of Islam, whose leader Louis Farrakhan gave the author an unprecedented nine-hour interview. At the end of it all, Malcolm X remains Malcolm X, for good or ill, one of the most fascinating historical figures of the 20th century. But it is difficult to see him in the same way again. There is a poignancy to the project too, for although Marable wrote more than 20 books – including a 1992 pamphlet about Malcolm X’s politics – this attempt to find the man behind the legend was a labour of love. Marable was a college freshman in the early 70s when the character of Malcolm X first intrigued him. His work on the biography was severely hampered by ill health. For 25 years he suffered sarcoidosis , an illness that gradually eroded his pulmonary functions. In the last year of research, he needed oxygen tanks to breathe, and the author had a double lung transplant last year. Marable died last Friday from complications related to pneumonia, three days before the worldwide publication of his book. It was, in more ways than one, a courageous endeavour. “The great temptation for a biographer of an iconic figure,” writes Marable, “is to portray him or her as a virtual saint, without the normal contradictions and blemishes all human beings have. I have devoted so many years in the effort to understand the interior personality and mind of Malcolm that this temptation disappeared long ago.” Freed from the restrictions imposed by this “mythic legend” and the constraints of “Malcolmology”, Marable opted to shine a light. So we meet a Malcolm X whose words of piety and purity as the public face of the Nation of Islam, and then as a spokesman for mainstream Islam in his own right, were not always matched by deeds. This Malcolm apparently drank wine on at least one occasion recorded by Marable, and rum and Coke on another. He also appears to have had an extramarital affair with a female follower and probably a tryst with an admirer while travelling abroad. We meet Malcolm the serial embellisher, who talked up the extent of his criminal background as a young man in Detroit to better shape his public persona – going so far as to appropriate the criminal histories of others. Malcolm also left out of his autobiography parts that might have been damaging once he became a spokesman for urban black America, such as the extent of his addiction to drugs, the crimes he committed against others in the black community, including his robbery of one of his own acquaintances, and the depth of his involvement in the running of prostitutes. There is virtual confirmation of the claim that in his pre-Nation of Islam hustling days, Malcolm Little, as he was, hired himself out as source of sexual gratification for an older white male benefactor. The story is recounted in the autobiography, but there the hustler is a third party called Rudy. Rudy, according to the autobiography, would “be paid to undress them both, then pick up the old man like a baby, lay him on his bed, then stand over him and sprinkle him all over with talcum powder. Rudy said the old man would actually reach his climax from that.” Based on “circumstantial but strong evidence, Malcolm was probably describing his own homosexual encounters,” Marable says. Malcolm X was depicted in his pomp as a strong figure of uncompromising masculinity but, tearing back the layers, Marable finds that Malcolm and his wife Betty had an unsatisfying sex life. This was more than a personal difficulty, for enemies in the Nation of Islam used it to humiliate him in public. Though he had family, Malcolm, unhappy for long periods in that marriage, travelled extensively, giving press conferences and standing-room-only lectures, including one in 1964 to the Oxford Union. Feeling abandoned, says Marable, Betty almost certainly sought comfort and companionship in an affair with one of his associates. There is a claim that, towards the end, he lapsed into depression. There is much in Marable’s new account of Malcolm’s life to perturb the modern reader. Misogyny and, indeed, violence against women, prior to Malcolm’s embrace of the Nation of Islam. His casual antisemitism as spokesman for the Nation of Islam and its leader Elijah Muhammed , and later as a wooer of Arab leaders such as Egypt’s Gamal Abdel Nasser . The harshness of his language: “There will be more violence than ever this year,” he told a New York Times reporter in 1964. “The whites had better understand this while there is still time. The negroes at the mass level are ready to act.” The glaring errors: such as his decision to go along with Muhammed’s tactic of making common nationalist cause with the racist, separatist lynchers of the Ku Klux Klan. His oft-repeated disdain for Martin Luther King and others who sought change through non-violent action. But a character based solely on the deep flaws outlined in the new book would have expired on the gurney after the assassination at the Audubon. What saves Marable’s Malcolm – and the Malcolm of Haley’s autobiography – is the struggle towards humanity and the redemption he experiences on his journey; twists and turns recorded by Marable with the intensity of a fly-on-the-wall documentary. Marable’s Malcolm, who died aged 39, is steadfast in his beliefs throughout, but those beliefs evolve to the point that he finds himself condemning and regretting stances he had previously taken. Not a life of consistency, by any means. Neither are the inconsistencies resolved by the time of his death. It is, as Manning’s title says, not one reinvention, but several. White America in the mid-60s could not stomach the black nationalist for ever pointing his finger. It didn’t like Malcolm Little, the sleazy street hustler who had earlier existed in the underbelly of Detroit and New York. But it could do business with the Malcolm slain at the Audubon, for by then he had shed the skin of Malcolm Little, and the layer that embraced the separatist, racist Nation of Islam. He had undertaken the hajj and, noting how people of different races embraced mainstream Islam, he rejected his earlier racism. He recalled in the days before his death his curt dismissal some years earlier of a white college girl who said she wanted to help and was sent away crying. One of his strengths, says Marable, certainly towards the end, was self-awareness. “I did a lot of things as a Muslim that I am sorry for now,” Malcolm X was to say. He was still a danger, to the government and the NoI, for by then his strategy was to make loud and common cause between the disadvantaged African-American communities of the US and administrations with whom he had forged alliances in Africa. He planned to make black America’s fight an international one, pursued through the UN. And he had that voice. The “ability to speak on behalf of those to whom society and state had denied a voice due to racial prejudice. He understood their yearnings and anticipated their actions,” as Marable writes. But the threat was of a different quality, for towards the end of his life Malcolm was in favour of using the system to improve the system rather than standing aside. And by 1999, 34 years after his death, the journey was completed to mainstream America’s satisfaction. The US postal service, Marable notes, celebrated Malcolm X and his “universal multiculturalism” with a commemorative stamp . This wasn’t a journey his erstwhile friends in the Nation of Islam wanted him to make, and one of Marable’s great tasks over the years of research was to piece together the parts played by the Nation and the FBI in the murder of Malcolm X. Three men, all members of the Nation of Islam, were jailed for the murder but few considered the convictions safe, even at the outset. One assassin was himself shot at the scene and was clearly culpable, but the other two were merely NoI enforcers regarded by the police and the FBI as credible, useful suspects. The system condemned them and barely paused for breath. Marable concludes that the gunmen and the helpers came from the NoI’s Newark Mosque and says, as others have before him, that the fatal shot was fired by a 26-year-old man who escaped capture. “This was the kill shot,” he says, “cutting a 7in-wide circle around his heart and left chest.” Were the authorities involved? Not obviously or directly so, according to the evidence here, though there is speculation. But indisputably there was bitterness that the authorities, who were monitoring most of the major players, were unwilling or unable to save Malcolm X from the ambush at the Audubon. These frustrations are voiced by Peter Bailey, a former aide to Malcolm in one of the two groups he established on leaving the Nation of Islam. The New York Police Department and the FBI “knew that Brother Malcolm’s destiny was assigned for assassination,” he says. But then, Malcolm knew it himself. He predicted to Haley that he probably wouldn’t be around to see the publication of the autobiography, and he was right: it went on sale through a small radical imprint, Grove House, nine months after his death. His actions and his words set a collision course that he couldn’t or wouldn’t alter. Former allies in the Nation boiled over at his renunciation of separatism and his personal criticisms of Muhammed, particularly his sharing of the open secret that the Nation’s leader, while professing piety, fathered several children with his various secretaries. Malcolm himself, reports Marable, had a deep affection for one of them. But Malcolm didn’t need to attack the Nation directly to seem dangerous to it. His pull was such, it was said, that merely by choosing a new path, he encouraged others to follow him. His willingness to work politically, not for civil rights but internationally for human rights, risked marginalising the Nation’s insular appeal to African Americans. There were personal, philosophical and commercial reasons to be rid of him. “In his final days,” says Marable, “he seemed of two minds, partly accepting of what he believed to be his fate and partly wishing or hoping that the problems might disappear and allow him to go back to a normal life . . . That he continued to harangue the Nation even when he knew that doing so would leave little choice but to strike at him seems to suggest that on some level he may have been inviting death.” Pop psychology, perhaps. But there are questions. Why, knowing he was a target and having seen his home firebombed (from whence comes the iconic poster of Malcolm standing at the window with an automatic rifle – a message to his former comrades rather than white America), did he refuse to travel with bodyguards? Why did he insist that only one of his followers be armed that night at the Audubon? Why did he refuse to allow a weapons search of the audience prior to admission? Why were inexperienced and easily distracted guards posted on the podium? How to explain his changed demeanour towards the end? “He always seemed to be tired, even exhausted and depressed. His shoes weren’t shined, his clothing was frequently wrinkled,” writes Marable. One researcher into his mood at that time speaks of a “kind of fatalism”. These unanswered questions, as much as Malcolm’s journey itself and what it says about the history of black America, help keep the legend alive. He was America’s harshest critic. But he was, in fact, a potent symbol of America: the land of progression, growth, contradictions and, above all, constant reinvention. The black British academic Dr Robert Beckford says the new book will place him at the forefront again: “I would say he was one of the greatest sociologists of ‘race’ in America. As great as Frantz Fanon i n registering the impact of internalised racism and as brilliant as WEB Du Bois was in ‘outing’ the systemic nature of white supremacy. He inspired a generation of intellectuals in religion ( James Cone , Mike Dyson ), philosophy ( Cornel West ) and feminist theory ( bell hooks ) to rage against black passivity and complicity with racism.” The writer and broadcaster Henry Bonsu, a founder of the black British digital radio station Colourful , says the impact endures in Britain, not just among the black intelligentsia but at grassroots: “People may not know the details and they may not care about some of the less palatable facts, because even now he presents as a man who said what needed saying when saying it took a lot of personal courage.” The Malcolm that Marable leaves behind is more complex, less sure-footed than before, but, fleshed out, he is more compelling. He is, Marable concludes, “the definitive yardstick by which all other Americans who aspire to the mantle of leadership should be measured”. Malcolm X: A Life in Reinvention , by Manning Marable, is published by Penguin, £30. Malcolm X United States Race issues Biography Hugh Muir guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Fledgling pimp, militant radical … American icon

Fledgling pimp, militant radical, Islamic convert . . . black activist Malcolm X was no stranger to controversy. Now a new biography explodes the myths that obscure the man The shot that killed Malcolm X in February 1965 as he stood on a podium in New York tore through his chest and resounded around the world. The talisman for black America was lifeless as supporters wheeled his body towards the hospital closest to the Audubon Ballroom, where he had just begun the night’s oration. An ambulance had been called. None came. But even at that stage, Malcolm X was already thwarting the hopes of those who took his life to curtail his influence; and the authorities whose silent complicity assisted the murder. None among the conspirators in the Nation of Islam (NoI), who spent months plotting his demise, could have predicted that anyone would be talking about Malcolm X 46 years on. Neither could the FBI, whose operatives listened in on his conversations. Who knew that the man they viewed as the most dangerous in America could enjoy such longevity? The legend peaks and troughs and every few years enjoys a kick-start. First the classic autobiography in conjunction with Alex Haley , hailed by Time magazine as one of the 10 most influential non-fiction books of the 20th century . Followed by lionisation by the Black Power movement. Then, decades later, his adoption by the giants of hip-hop as a symbol of black pride and non-conformity. And now Malcolm X is the subject of a new warts-and-all biography that took 12 years to write and prompts fresh reflection on the man white America feared above all others. It’s another kick-start, even if it does take the Malcolm we know from Haley’s book into places Malcolm X wouldn’t have wanted it to go. Manning Marable, an academic and respected authority on black America, doesn’t use his book Malcolm X: A Life in Reinvention , to destroy the reputation of the man who told the heartlands that the assassination of President Kennedy represented “chickens coming home to roost”. But, over 487 pages, Marable does effectively destroy the cultivated brand. There is a wealth of detail, some of it new, some of it old stories confirmed, all aided by documents and new recollections from the US government, the FBI and the Nation of Islam, whose leader Louis Farrakhan gave the author an unprecedented nine-hour interview. At the end of it all, Malcolm X remains Malcolm X, for good or ill, one of the most fascinating historical figures of the 20th century. But it is difficult to see him in the same way again. There is a poignancy to the project too, for although Marable wrote more than 20 books – including a 1992 pamphlet about Malcolm X’s politics – this attempt to find the man behind the legend was a labour of love. Marable was a college freshman in the early 70s when the character of Malcolm X first intrigued him. His work on the biography was severely hampered by ill health. For 25 years he suffered sarcoidosis , an illness that gradually eroded his pulmonary functions. In the last year of research, he needed oxygen tanks to breathe, and the author had a double lung transplant last year. Marable died last Friday from complications related to pneumonia, three days before the worldwide publication of his book. It was, in more ways than one, a courageous endeavour. “The great temptation for a biographer of an iconic figure,” writes Marable, “is to portray him or her as a virtual saint, without the normal contradictions and blemishes all human beings have. I have devoted so many years in the effort to understand the interior personality and mind of Malcolm that this temptation disappeared long ago.” Freed from the restrictions imposed by this “mythic legend” and the constraints of “Malcolmology”, Marable opted to shine a light. So we meet a Malcolm X whose words of piety and purity as the public face of the Nation of Islam, and then as a spokesman for mainstream Islam in his own right, were not always matched by deeds. This Malcolm apparently drank wine on at least one occasion recorded by Marable, and rum and Coke on another. He also appears to have had an extramarital affair with a female follower and probably a tryst with an admirer while travelling abroad. We meet Malcolm the serial embellisher, who talked up the extent of his criminal background as a young man in Detroit to better shape his public persona – going so far as to appropriate the criminal histories of others. Malcolm also left out of his autobiography parts that might have been damaging once he became a spokesman for urban black America, such as the extent of his addiction to drugs, the crimes he committed against others in the black community, including his robbery of one of his own acquaintances, and the depth of his involvement in the running of prostitutes. There is virtual confirmation of the claim that in his pre-Nation of Islam hustling days, Malcolm Little, as he was, hired himself out as source of sexual gratification for an older white male benefactor. The story is recounted in the autobiography, but there the hustler is a third party called Rudy. Rudy, according to the autobiography, would “be paid to undress them both, then pick up the old man like a baby, lay him on his bed, then stand over him and sprinkle him all over with talcum powder. Rudy said the old man would actually reach his climax from that.” Based on “circumstantial but strong evidence, Malcolm was probably describing his own homosexual encounters,” Marable says. Malcolm X was depicted in his pomp as a strong figure of uncompromising masculinity but, tearing back the layers, Marable finds that Malcolm and his wife Betty had an unsatisfying sex life. This was more than a personal difficulty, for enemies in the Nation of Islam used it to humiliate him in public. Though he had family, Malcolm, unhappy for long periods in that marriage, travelled extensively, giving press conferences and standing-room-only lectures, including one in 1964 to the Oxford Union. Feeling abandoned, says Marable, Betty almost certainly sought comfort and companionship in an affair with one of his associates. There is a claim that, towards the end, he lapsed into depression. There is much in Marable’s new account of Malcolm’s life to perturb the modern reader. Misogyny and, indeed, violence against women, prior to Malcolm’s embrace of the Nation of Islam. His casual antisemitism as spokesman for the Nation of Islam and its leader Elijah Muhammed , and later as a wooer of Arab leaders such as Egypt’s Gamal Abdel Nasser . The harshness of his language: “There will be more violence than ever this year,” he told a New York Times reporter in 1964. “The whites had better understand this while there is still time. The negroes at the mass level are ready to act.” The glaring errors: such as his decision to go along with Muhammed’s tactic of making common nationalist cause with the racist, separatist lynchers of the Ku Klux Klan. His oft-repeated disdain for Martin Luther King and others who sought change through non-violent action. But a character based solely on the deep flaws outlined in the new book would have expired on the gurney after the assassination at the Audubon. What saves Marable’s Malcolm – and the Malcolm of Haley’s autobiography – is the struggle towards humanity and the redemption he experiences on his journey; twists and turns recorded by Marable with the intensity of a fly-on-the-wall documentary. Marable’s Malcolm, who died aged 39, is steadfast in his beliefs throughout, but those beliefs evolve to the point that he finds himself condemning and regretting stances he had previously taken. Not a life of consistency, by any means. Neither are the inconsistencies resolved by the time of his death. It is, as Manning’s title says, not one reinvention, but several. White America in the mid-60s could not stomach the black nationalist for ever pointing his finger. It didn’t like Malcolm Little, the sleazy street hustler who had earlier existed in the underbelly of Detroit and New York. But it could do business with the Malcolm slain at the Audubon, for by then he had shed the skin of Malcolm Little, and the layer that embraced the separatist, racist Nation of Islam. He had undertaken the hajj and, noting how people of different races embraced mainstream Islam, he rejected his earlier racism. He recalled in the days before his death his curt dismissal some years earlier of a white college girl who said she wanted to help and was sent away crying. One of his strengths, says Marable, certainly towards the end, was self-awareness. “I did a lot of things as a Muslim that I am sorry for now,” Malcolm X was to say. He was still a danger, to the government and the NoI, for by then his strategy was to make loud and common cause between the disadvantaged African-American communities of the US and administrations with whom he had forged alliances in Africa. He planned to make black America’s fight an international one, pursued through the UN. And he had that voice. The “ability to speak on behalf of those to whom society and state had denied a voice due to racial prejudice. He understood their yearnings and anticipated their actions,” as Marable writes. But the threat was of a different quality, for towards the end of his life Malcolm was in favour of using the system to improve the system rather than standing aside. And by 1999, 34 years after his death, the journey was completed to mainstream America’s satisfaction. The US postal service, Marable notes, celebrated Malcolm X and his “universal multiculturalism” with a commemorative stamp . This wasn’t a journey his erstwhile friends in the Nation of Islam wanted him to make, and one of Marable’s great tasks over the years of research was to piece together the parts played by the Nation and the FBI in the murder of Malcolm X. Three men, all members of the Nation of Islam, were jailed for the murder but few considered the convictions safe, even at the outset. One assassin was himself shot at the scene and was clearly culpable, but the other two were merely NoI enforcers regarded by the police and the FBI as credible, useful suspects. The system condemned them and barely paused for breath. Marable concludes that the gunmen and the helpers came from the NoI’s Newark Mosque and says, as others have before him, that the fatal shot was fired by a 26-year-old man who escaped capture. “This was the kill shot,” he says, “cutting a 7in-wide circle around his heart and left chest.” Were the authorities involved? Not obviously or directly so, according to the evidence here, though there is speculation. But indisputably there was bitterness that the authorities, who were monitoring most of the major players, were unwilling or unable to save Malcolm X from the ambush at the Audubon. These frustrations are voiced by Peter Bailey, a former aide to Malcolm in one of the two groups he established on leaving the Nation of Islam. The New York Police Department and the FBI “knew that Brother Malcolm’s destiny was assigned for assassination,” he says. But then, Malcolm knew it himself. He predicted to Haley that he probably wouldn’t be around to see the publication of the autobiography, and he was right: it went on sale through a small radical imprint, Grove House, nine months after his death. His actions and his words set a collision course that he couldn’t or wouldn’t alter. Former allies in the Nation boiled over at his renunciation of separatism and his personal criticisms of Muhammed, particularly his sharing of the open secret that the Nation’s leader, while professing piety, fathered several children with his various secretaries. Malcolm himself, reports Marable, had a deep affection for one of them. But Malcolm didn’t need to attack the Nation directly to seem dangerous to it. His pull was such, it was said, that merely by choosing a new path, he encouraged others to follow him. His willingness to work politically, not for civil rights but internationally for human rights, risked marginalising the Nation’s insular appeal to African Americans. There were personal, philosophical and commercial reasons to be rid of him. “In his final days,” says Marable, “he seemed of two minds, partly accepting of what he believed to be his fate and partly wishing or hoping that the problems might disappear and allow him to go back to a normal life . . . That he continued to harangue the Nation even when he knew that doing so would leave little choice but to strike at him seems to suggest that on some level he may have been inviting death.” Pop psychology, perhaps. But there are questions. Why, knowing he was a target and having seen his home firebombed (from whence comes the iconic poster of Malcolm standing at the window with an automatic rifle – a message to his former comrades rather than white America), did he refuse to travel with bodyguards? Why did he insist that only one of his followers be armed that night at the Audubon? Why did he refuse to allow a weapons search of the audience prior to admission? Why were inexperienced and easily distracted guards posted on the podium? How to explain his changed demeanour towards the end? “He always seemed to be tired, even exhausted and depressed. His shoes weren’t shined, his clothing was frequently wrinkled,” writes Marable. One researcher into his mood at that time speaks of a “kind of fatalism”. These unanswered questions, as much as Malcolm’s journey itself and what it says about the history of black America, help keep the legend alive. He was America’s harshest critic. But he was, in fact, a potent symbol of America: the land of progression, growth, contradictions and, above all, constant reinvention. The black British academic Dr Robert Beckford says the new book will place him at the forefront again: “I would say he was one of the greatest sociologists of ‘race’ in America. As great as Frantz Fanon i n registering the impact of internalised racism and as brilliant as WEB Du Bois was in ‘outing’ the systemic nature of white supremacy. He inspired a generation of intellectuals in religion ( James Cone , Mike Dyson ), philosophy ( Cornel West ) and feminist theory ( bell hooks ) to rage against black passivity and complicity with racism.” The writer and broadcaster Henry Bonsu, a founder of the black British digital radio station Colourful , says the impact endures in Britain, not just among the black intelligentsia but at grassroots: “People may not know the details and they may not care about some of the less palatable facts, because even now he presents as a man who said what needed saying when saying it took a lot of personal courage.” The Malcolm that Marable leaves behind is more complex, less sure-footed than before, but, fleshed out, he is more compelling. He is, Marable concludes, “the definitive yardstick by which all other Americans who aspire to the mantle of leadership should be measured”. Malcolm X: A Life in Reinvention , by Manning Marable, is published by Penguin, £30. Malcolm X United States Race issues Biography Hugh Muir guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Ai Weiwei family call inquiry ‘absurd’

Chinese artist’s relatives say allegations are an attempt to stifle activism amid wider government crackdown on dissidents Relatives of the detained Chinese artist Ai Weiwei have denounced an official report that he is suspected of economic crimes as “absurd”. The state news agency, Xinhua, published a one-line story saying police were investigating the 53-year-old , but deleted it from its website within the hour. The piece did not explicitly say that authorities were holding him and police have not responded to faxed queries. There is still no word on Ai’s friend Wen Tao, 38, who was reportedly detained on Sunday. Human rights groups believe Ai’s detention is part of a wider crackdown in which scores of activists and dissidents have been detained, formally arrested or disappeared . It has sparked an international outcry. Ai’s older sister, Gao Ge, told Reuters: “The economic crimes report is absurd, because the way he was taken and then disappeared shows it’s nothing of the sort. This is more like a crime gang’s behaviour than a country with laws.” She said her brother had previously warned his family he might one day be jailed for his activities. “He was very clear that we shouldn’t try to meddle and stop him speaking out … My mother cried,” she added. Ai’s mother, Gao Ying, said the “economic crimes” allegations were being used to stifle his activism, adding: “If he’s not released, this will be the start of a long struggle … They still haven’t notified us why he was taken or where he is.” Chinese law states that police must inform an individual’s relatives or place of work within 24 hours of detention, unless there is no way to do so or it would “impede the investigation”. Gao said her son was unlikely to accept charges to win a swift release. “If he’s not given justice, he’ll refuse to come out, I think. That’s his character,” she said. Human rights groups allege that similar accusations of economic wrongdoing – such as tax-related charges – have been used to intimidate activists in the past. In an interview last year, Ai told the Guardian the state might take action against him and that security officials had recently visited his bank. But he added: “I also have to speak out for people around me who are afraid, who think it is not worth it or who have totally given up hope. So I want to set an example: you can do it and this is OK.” The Global Times, a popular state-run tabloid, has run another attack on western condemnation of the case. “[China] needs people like Ai Weiwei. But at the same time, it is even more important that Chinese law restrict the provocative behaviour of Ai Weiwei and others,” it wrote. The outgoing US ambassador, Jon Huntsman, described Ai Weiwei as one of the activists who “challenge the Chinese government to serve the public in all cases and at all times” in a strongly worded speech in Shanghai on Wednesday night. He said future ambassadors would continue to defend social activists such as Ai, jailed writer and Nobel peace prizewinner Liu Xiaobo, and Chen Guangcheng, a rights activist under house arrest. China Ai Weiwei Human rights Tania Branigan guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …