• Refresh for the latest or select the auto-update button • Email your thoughts to scott.murray@guardian.co.uk • Get the latest league tables and more in our stats centre Pre-match entertainment: This classic 1981 documentary charts one of Manchester City’s many meltdowns. Who can resist? Starting with Liverpool dishing City a terrible thrashing at Maine Road, it captures the bellicose genius of Malcolm Allison, as well as his successor John Bond’s ability to brashly wing it. Enjoy, enjoy. Referee: Mark Halsey (Lancashire) Man City: Hart, Boyata, Kompany, Lescott, Kolarov, Barry, Toure Yaya, Milner, Tevez, Adam Johnson, Dzeko. Subs: Taylor, Zabaleta, Wright-Phillips, Silva, De Jong, Balotelli, McGivern. Liverpool: Reina, Flanagan, Carragher, Skrtel, Aurelio, Kuyt, Lucas, Spearing, Meireles, Suarez, Carroll. Subs: Gulacsi, Cole, Maxi, Wilson, Ngog, Shelvey, Robinson. Kick off: 8pm. City should be favourites tonight. They’re coming off the back of a confidence-boosting 5-0 thrashing of Sunderland, and recall striker Edin Dzeko, Gareth Barry and James Milner, £££££££££s worth of talent. Liverpool, on the other hand, are without permacrock Daniel Agger, Glen Johnson and captain Steven Gerrard, their squad in such tatters that Kenny Dalglish is tonight handing a first-team debut to 18-year-old defender John Flanagan. But if any team can confound expectations when favourites, it’s Manchester City. A month of the campaign’s still to go, of course, but that doesn’t stop this one having a real end-of-season feel to it. Liverpool have little to play for. They’ve got next to no chance of qualifying for Europe next season; fifth place is realistically beyond them, and the only way sixth will make it is if City win the FA Cup but come fifth in the league. City will be hoping to increase their chances of a Champions League place, it’s true, but the day we’re obliged to get excited about fourth place will be the day we run the hot bath, put on some Leonard Cohen, and pour ourselves a large, relaxing gin. Premier League Liverpool Manchester City Scott Murray guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …• Refresh for the latest or select the auto-update button • Email your thoughts to scott.murray@guardian.co.uk • Get the latest league tables and more in our stats centre Pre-match entertainment: This classic 1981 documentary charts one of Manchester City’s many meltdowns. Who can resist? Starting with Liverpool dishing City a terrible thrashing at Maine Road, it captures the bellicose genius of Malcolm Allison, as well as his successor John Bond’s ability to brashly wing it. Enjoy, enjoy. Referee: Mark Halsey (Lancashire) Man City: Hart, Boyata, Kompany, Lescott, Kolarov, Barry, Toure Yaya, Milner, Tevez, Adam Johnson, Dzeko. Subs: Taylor, Zabaleta, Wright-Phillips, Silva, De Jong, Balotelli, McGivern. Liverpool: Reina, Flanagan, Carragher, Skrtel, Aurelio, Kuyt, Lucas, Spearing, Meireles, Suarez, Carroll. Subs: Gulacsi, Cole, Maxi, Wilson, Ngog, Shelvey, Robinson. Kick off: 8pm. City should be favourites tonight. They’re coming off the back of a confidence-boosting 5-0 thrashing of Sunderland, and recall striker Edin Dzeko, Gareth Barry and James Milner, £££££££££s worth of talent. Liverpool, on the other hand, are without permacrock Daniel Agger, Glen Johnson and captain Steven Gerrard, their squad in such tatters that Kenny Dalglish is tonight handing a first-team debut to 18-year-old defender John Flanagan. But if any team can confound expectations when favourites, it’s Manchester City. A month of the campaign’s still to go, of course, but that doesn’t stop this one having a real end-of-season feel to it. Liverpool have little to play for. They’ve got next to no chance of qualifying for Europe next season; fifth place is realistically beyond them, and the only way sixth will make it is if City win the FA Cup but come fifth in the league. City will be hoping to increase their chances of a Champions League place, it’s true, but the day we’re obliged to get excited about fourth place will be the day we run the hot bath, put on some Leonard Cohen, and pour ourselves a large, relaxing gin. Premier League Liverpool Manchester City Scott Murray guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Ali Abdullah Saleh hails a handover deal brokered by Gulf states, but protesters reject the initiative Yemen’s president, Ali Abdullah Saleh, has hailed an initiative brokered by a regional bloc of Gulf states that would see him step down and transfer power to his deputy. But he insisted he would only do so when his term ended in 2013 – a condition already rejected by youthful protesters who are demanding that he be ousted immediately. Gulf foreign ministers who have been pushing for a negotiated end to three months’ worth of political turmoil and bloody violence in Yemen said publicly for the first time that their mediation efforts involved Saleh standing down, though they did not specify when that would take place. After rejecting a similar mediation offer from the Gulf states last week , Saleh appeared to backtrack on Monday saying he had “no reservations about transferring power peacefully as long as it was within the framework of the constitution,” a phrase he has used frequently in the past weeks. Yemen’s opposition coalition swiftly rejected the Gulf initiative saying its offers of immunity for the president and his family from prosecution were unjust. “Who would be a fool to offer guarantees to a regime that kills peaceful protesters? Our principal demand is that Saleh leaves first,” the opposition spokesman Mohammed al-Sabry said, referring to the Gulf assurances that Saleh and his sons would not have to face a similar fate to rulers in Tunisia and Egypt. Meanwhile Yemen’s youthful protesters, who have been bearing the brunt of an increasingly violent governmental crackdown, came out in force on Monday in the cities of Sana’a, Aden and Taiz demanding that Saleh step down and that he and members of his family be put on trial. “This is the 12th time this month Ali [Saleh] has told us he is ready to quit, yet he is still here. His promises are worthless to us now. This is political jockeying, nothing else,” said Ali Fowruzi, reading a statement on behalf of Yemen’s Youth Revolutionary Council before tens of thousands stationed outside the gates of Sana’a University. More than 120 people have been killed, 46 them children, since protests began in earnest in mid-February. On Sunday the al-Jazeera offices in Sana’a were fastened closed with sealing wax. An official from the interior ministry said that this final action came after the persistence of al-Jazeera in the “implementation of a sabotage scheme aimed at inciting strife, hatred and fighting in a number Yemen’s provinces”. Yemen Arab and Middle East unrest Tom Finn guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Rebels say deal is unacceptable because it does not require Gaddafi to step down Libya’s revolutionary leadership has flatly rejected an African Union peace initiative because it does not require Muammar Gaddafi to immediately relinquish power. The rebels’ interim ruling council met an AU delegation from five countries – led by three presidents and two foreign ministers – the day after Gaddafi endorsed the African “roadmap to peace”, which included an immediate ceasefire, the suspension of Nato air strikes and talks towards a political settlement. But Mustafa Abdul Jalil, the revolutionary council chairman, said the rebels had told the AU its proposal had been outdated by events, including the UN security council resolution authorising air strikes, and was in any case unacceptable because it left Gaddafi in power while both sides negotiated. “From the very beginning we have been asking that the exit of Gaddafi and his sons take place immediately. We cannot consider this or any future proposal that does not include this peoples’ requirement,” said Jalil. “He leaves on his own or the march of the people will be at his doorstep.” That view was strongly backed by thousands of demonstrators outside the Benghazi hotel where the talks were held. They waved revolutionary flags and carried signs saying: “No solution with Gaddafi staying”. Jalil said that the AU peace proposal was drafted a month ago and had been overtaken by the UN security council resolution requiring Gaddafi to halt his attacks on civilians. “Colonel Gaddafi did not recognise this resolution and continued bombing civilians from the air and shooting them, and surrounding cities with his forces and put his forces inside cities. There is not any way the Libyan people can accept such a situation,” he said. Although the AU proposal included a ceasefire, the rebels said it did not go far enough. They want one that requires Gaddafi to withdraw his forces from towns where they have been used to suppress the revolution, particularly Misrata and Zawiya, and the allowing of unfettered public protest in the hope that Libyans in cities still under Gaddafi’s control will seize the opportunity to rise up. The British foreign secretary, William Hague, backed the revolutionaries’ position saying that Gaddafi must go and that a new ceasefire would have to meet the UN requirement for a withdrawal of his forces from cities they are attacking. “Anything short of this would be a betrayal of the people of Libya and would play into the hands of the regime, which has announced two utterly meaningless ceasefires since the fighting began without its vicious military campaign missing a single beat,” the foreign secretary said. Jalil also rejected the AU’s proposal for a cessation of Nato air strikes. “If it were not for the air strikes carried out by the coalition forces and Nato we would not now be at this meeting,” he said. The AU’s proposal for an end to the air strikes was also met with scepticism by Nato. Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the Nato secretary general, said that for a ceasefire to work it would need to be “credible and verifiable”, suggesting that international monitors would need to be deployed on the ground in Libya, but that it was “too early” for this. “We need to establish an effective monitoring mechanism if a ceasefire is to be credible,” he said. Jalil said that the revolutionary council had confronted the AU delegation with evidence that mercenaries from several African countries were fighting for Gaddafi, particularly from Algeria. The AU delegation – made up of South Africa, Uganda, Mauritania, Congo-Brazzaville and Mali – left the talks looking glum, without making a public comment and to the derisive shouts of the protesters outside the hotel. The revolutionary leadership was distrustful of the AU initiative from the beginning. Gaddafi used Libya’s oil wealth to buy greater influence in Africa after his aspirations to forge an Arab union were spurned. The AU delegation included the leaders of countries that have taken money from Gaddafi as well as South Africa’s president, Jacob Zuma, whose party, the African National Congress, has accepted considerable donations from the Libyan leader. The rebels were disturbed to see Zuma refer to the Libyan dictator as “brother leader”. The South African leader did not travel on to the Benghazi meeting. While Gaddafi told the AU he was ready for a ceasefire, his forces continued their onslaught against Misrata. Unicef warned that thousands of children in the city were in grave danger. At least 20 children, mostly under the age of 10, have been killed in the besieged city in the past month, according to Unicef. Many more have been injured by gunfire or shrapnel from mortars and tank shells. “More and more children in this city are being killed, injured and denied their essential needs due to the fighting,” said Shahida Azfar of Unicef. “Until the fighting stops we face the intolerable inevitability of children continuing to die and suffer in this war zone.” At least 250 people in the town, mostly civilians, have died in the past month according to two doctors interviewed by phone by Human Rights Watch (HRW). “The Libyan government’s near-siege of Misrata has not prevented reports of serious abuses getting out,” said Sarah Leah Whitson of HRW. “We’ve heard disturbing accounts of shelling and shooting at a clinic and in populated areas, killing civilians where no battle was raging.” Libya African Union Muammar Gaddafi Arab and Middle East unrest Middle East Chris McGreal Harriet Sherwood Ian Traynor Nicholas Watt guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Sarah Palin showed back up on Fox News’ bottom-of-the-barrel show — Justice With Judge Jeanine — this weekend and put in a nice word for Donald Trump and his raving Birtherism . Of course, we think Trump is just trying to make the rest of the GOP field look sane and intelligent by comparison. In which case, Palin just tossed away his little gift: PALIN: Well, I appreciate that the Donald wants to spend his resources getting to the bottom of something that so interests him and many Americans. You know, more power to him. He’s not just throwin’ stones and, um, from the sidelines — he’s diggin’ in there, he’s paying for researchers to find out why President Obama would have spent two million dollars to not show his birth certificate. Of course, Obama has NOT spent “two million dollars” or anything close to that on this matter. What money he has spent has been on defending the legitimacy of his claim to be president against the lawsuits brought by nuts like Orly Taitz and Phil Berg — not to “hide” his official birth certificate from the state of Hawaii, which he has in fact displayed publicly since 2008 — and that money has been closer to a couple thousand dollars, if that much. The claim that he spent this money originated with yet another phony story from WorldNutDaily, the home of All Things Birther. It was carefully examined by Mother Jones, which (surprise, surprise) found that it was another bit of dishonest absurdity: Given the sheer number of cases, it seems plausible that the president and the government may have been forced to devote real resources to their defense. But in fact the opposite may be true: The birthers’ own copious legal bungling could wind up costing them more than Obama will have to spend defending himself. The birthers have peppered dozens of state and federal courts around the country with legal challenges—against the president and other government officials and organizations who had some role in allowing Obama’s name to be placed on the ballot, including the Federal Election Commission, various state election officials, and the US Supreme Court. Some of the suits, particularly those filed by the movement’s leading lady, California lawyer/dentist Orly Taitz, have been headlined by members of the military claiming they’ve been wrongfully made to serve in foreign wars by an illegitimate commander in chief. Most recently, birther attorneys have represented car dealers who charge that Obama is a phony president who lacked the authority to order a restructuring of Chrysler that they say cost them their businesses. WorldNetDaily has noted that FEC filings show that Obama’s presidential campaign has paid out more than $1.7 million since the election to the law firm of Perkins Coie. Until recently, that firm was home to Obama’s campaign lawyer, and now White House counsel, Robert Bauer—the very same DC lawyer, says WND, who has defended Obama in many of the birther lawsuits. Ergo, WND concluded, Obama must be devoting that entire $1.7 million to crushing birthers in court. This is a ridiculous claim: Even after an election is over a presidential campaign has plenty of need for lawyers as it winds down operations and meets campaign finance law requirements. And it’s been pretty cheap to defend these suits, because the people bringing them are — in addition to being irrational scam artists — simply incompetent: But the birthers’ lawsuits don’t exactly seem to be requiring Obama’s lawyers—government or private—to burn the midnight oil. Roger West, an assistant US attorney in the central district of California, represented the government in a lawsuit brought by Taitz on behalf of perennial presidential candidate Alan Keyes, asking the court to require that Obama prove he is a natural-born citizen. The case has dragged on for more than a year, mostly because Taitz, a graduate of an online, unaccredited law school, failed to serve the defendants. Judge David O. Carter dismissed the suit in October for a host of reasons, but Taitz has appealed. Yet West says that far from bleeding his office, Taitz and her co-counsel Gary Kreep have assembled such a weak case that he hasn’t had to spend much time on it. “I filed one motion that didn’t take too long, we’ve had two hearings and that’s it,” he says. “It’s not like we’ve devoted some sort of task force to this.” Army Major Rebecca Ausprung handled two of the birther cases against the Department of the Army that disputed Obama’s authority as commander in chief to order soldiers to war. Ausprung says she spent a few hours drafting motions and doing research, and she did have to make three short trips to Georgia from Arlington, Virginia. She prevailed in both cases. “The monetary cost to the government in defending these two cases was extremely minimal,” she says. But Trump and Palin can get on Fox News and tell the world that he’s spending millions to “hide” his birth certificate. Of course, that begs the question: Even if he were “hiding” these medical records, doesn’t he have the right to medical privacy we give every other American? No one else born in Hawaii would have to provide their “long form” to prove their citizenship by birth — why should Obama? We know the answer: Because Republicans believe they can only win when they gin up fake scandals with no basis in reality. They had so much success with it in 2004 — and now they’re addicted to it.
Continue reading …James Inhofe, Pat Robertson and Glenn Beck will be very unhappy about this. NY Times: The Ivory Coast strongman, Laurent Gbagbo , was captured on Monday after a week-long siege of his residence and placed under the control of his rival claimant to power, according to the French military and a senior American diplomat. Both French ground forces and troops loyal to Alassane Ouattara , the internationally recognized winner of Ivory Coast’s election last year, had pressed into the city toward the residence where Mr. Gbagbo has been holed up. “It is my pleasure to announce officially that the former president of Cote d’Ivoire, Laurent Gbagbo, has been arrested,” said Youssoufou Bamba, Mr. Ouattara’s representative to the United Nations . “He is alive and he will be brought to justice to respond to the crimes he committed. In this way, the Cote d’Ivoire reaches the end of its tragedy, of its nightmare.” “His era is over,” Mr. Bamba added, saying Mr. Gbagbo was now “under our custody.” I’ve been writing about the support Gbagbo had from the religious right for a while now, but the NY Times seems to have just discovered this fact even though they hedge on whether religion is actually the reason the U.N. group got involved, yet they lay out a good case for it. It is impossible to know for sure if the group sided with Mr. Gbagbo because he is a Christian; his rival, Alassane Ouattara , recognized internationally as the winner of last year’s presidential election, is a Muslim. But to judge by the recent comments of Senator James M. Inhofe , the Rev. Pat Robertson , the Christian broadcaster and former presidential candidate, and Glenn Beck , the Fox News television personality, religion did play a role in their support. — Mr. Robertson, who ran for president as a Republican in 1988 and founded the Christian Broadcasting Network , has been more enthusiastic in his support of Mr. Gbagbo. He has also been more overtly interested in Mr. Gbagbo’s status as the Christian candidate. Last Tuesday, Mr. Robertson said on “The 700 Club,” CBN’s main news program, that Mr. Gbagbo was the victim of voter fraud. “The U.N. has said the other guy won. Well, that may be, but the problem is, is that this is a country now that has been run by a Christian that is going to be into the hands of Muslims. So it’s one more Muslim nation that’s going to be building up that ring of Sharia law around the Middle East.” Mr. Beck, of Fox News, is a Mormon, while Mr. Inhofe and Mr. Robertson are non-Mormon evangelical Protestants. But Mr. Beck, too, has put a religious spin on Mr. Gbagbo’s plight. This was a unification election in the Ivory Coast, so I supported whoever won the election, and Gbagbo lost. Ouattara should be held to these same standards. You’ve won, so unify your country. enlarge Credit: AFP Gbagbo arrested in white underwear T-shirt
Continue reading …Obama the centrist? That’s the takeaway from New York Times reporter Jeff Zeleny’s Sunday “news analysis,” “ President Adopts a Measured Course to Recapture the Middle .” The original online headline was even more misleading: “President Obama Adopts Centrist Approach.” President Obama opened the week by calling on Democrats to embrace his re-election campaign. He closed it by praising Republicans for forging a compromise to cut spending this year and avert a government shutdown. The juxtaposition made clearer than ever the more centrist governing style Mr. Obama has adopted since his party’s big losses in November and his recapture-the-middle strategy for winning a second term. Actually, Zeleny has considered Obama centrist, or at least a “pragmatist,” from his first year in office, well before the 2010 election. Here's Zeleny on Obama the pragmatist in December 2009: “ He delivered a mix of realism and idealism….he continued a pattern evident throughout his public career of favoring pragmatism over absolutes .” On Sunday Zeleny positioned Obama in the center, at least from the view of the far-left wing of his party: The president may be viewed as liberal by some of his conservative critics, but to the traditional base of the Democratic Party he is often seen as not liberal enough. As details of the budget agreement came to light on Saturday, the first criticism came from the left, with Representative Jesse L. Jackson Jr., Democrat of Illinois, accusing the president of “keeping the government open on the backs of the poor and disenfranchised.” …. After Republicans found success casting Mr. Obama as a reflexive liberal intent on expanding the reach of government, the president has sought to reintroduce himself as a pragmatic leader more attuned to the political center than to the ideologies of left or right . He has talked about this brand of politics for years, but now his challenge is to employ it. Again, Zeleny had previously taken Obama at his word that he is “a pragmatic leader more attuned to the political center.” If Zeleny truly thought Obama was only masquerading as a centrist and had failed to actually “employ” such politics, why didn't he mention this in his reporting? Mr. Obama not only helped avoid the first government shutdown in 15 years, but also pressured Republicans to remove provisions intended to restrict financing for Planned Parenthood and to limit environmental regulations. In doing so, he assumed the role of a level-headed referee, rising above the squabbling to take ownership of a solution rather than a problem. “He’s the undisputed grownup in the group,” said Jim Jordan, a Democratic strategist who has managed Senate and presidential campaigns across the country. “Presidents almost always compare well against Congress.” Zeleny also went on to praise Boehner’s handling of his own caucus. Zeleny’s colleague Peter Baker made the same “pragmatist” claim in his front-page story for the Sunday Week in Review, “ The Vision Thing – Above the fray, the president struggles to define liberalism in an era of debt .” Mr. Obama has always cast himself as a pragmatist and he seems to be feeling his way in the post-midterm election environment.
Continue reading …Moldovan woman who was sent back home where she was at risk from her traffickers wins ‘groundbreaking’ settlement A woman who was a repeated victim of sex trafficking and suffered severe sexual degradation is to be paid substantial damages by the Home Office after it returned her to Moldova, where she faced grave dangers. The “groundbreaking” settlement was reached on the eve of a high court hearing of her claim against the Home Office for failing to take steps to protect her and for sending her back to Moldova despite substantial grounds to believe she was at risk from her traffickers. The woman, who cannot be named because she and her family are still at risk of retribution by her traffickers, was kidnapped at the age of 14 and then continually trafficked and re-trafficked for forced prostitution in Italy, Turkey, Hungary, Romania, Israel and Britain until she was 21. Her solicitor, Harriet Wistrich of Birnberg Peirce and Partners, said she was repeatedly beaten, raped and threatened with death, and was treated as a slave. She was arrested by police and immigration officers in a brothel in London in 2003, but instead of rescuing her they charged her with possessing false documents, which had been provided by her traffickers. She was imprisoned for three months before being sent back to Moldova through a fast-track immigration process. Her trafficker was neither investigated nor arrested but was allowed to visit her in Holloway prison and Oakington detention centre, where he posed as her boyfriend, in order to intimidate her. Wistrich said the woman was found by her trafficker when she got back to Moldova and was savagely ill-treated before being trafficked back into prostitution for a further two years. In 2007 she was arrested again in Britain and held at Yarl’s Wood immigration detention centre, but was eventually referred to the Poppy project, which identified her as a victim of sex trafficking and provided her with the necessary support to make an asylum claim. She has since been granted refugee status in recognition that the Moldovan authorities could not offer her adequate protection against her traffickers. Wistrich said the undisclosed “substantial damages” followed the “groundbreaking” attempt to sue the Home Office for its failure to protect her. She said she hoped immigration authorities would learn from the experience so that other trafficked women would be treated as victims instead of criminals and rescued rather than handed back to their traffickers to be raped and ill-treated. Mrs Justice Cox, who approved the confidential settlement, said the woman had been the repeated victim of sex trafficking over a long period of time, during which she had suffered severe sexual degradation resulting in psychiatric injury. She remained at significant risk of serious harm because the police had not been able to catch her traffickers. A spokeswoman for the Poppy project said it hoped the case would highlight the continuing need to identify and protect victims, “especially as we are seeing an increasing number of trafficking victims detained and given removal directions”. The immigration minister, Damian Green, said it was a very disturbing case and showed why the approach to human trafficking had changed significantly since 2003. The UK had introduced a mechanism to identify and refer victims of trafficking and established mandatory training for all frontline immigration staff, he said. Immigration and asylum Moldova Alan Travis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Oxford accuses PM of using inaccurate and misleading figures after he claims one black student was admitted last year David Cameron has clashed with Oxford University over its numbers of black students, after he said it was “disgraceful” that only one black student began studying at the university last year. Speaking at a PM Direct event in North Yorkshire, he said: “I saw figures the other day that showed that only one black person went to Oxford last year. I think that is disgraceful. We have got to do better than that.” But Oxford accused Cameron of quoting an “inaccurate and highly misleading” figure. Oxford’s admissions figures for 2009 show that just one “black Caribbean” candidate was accepted for undergraduate study, out of 27 black students in that year’s intake. Last autumn, seven black Caribbean candidates were accepted and there was a total of 20 black students in this year’s intake. The success rate for black candidates at Oxford remains lower than white candidates. In part, Oxford blames this on the fact that black candidates are more likely to apply for over-subscribed subjects, such as medicine. Figures obtained by the Labour MP David Lammy last year showed that more than 20 Oxbridge colleges made no offers to black candidates for undergraduate courses in 2009. One college had not admitted a black student in five years . An Oxford University spokeswoman said: “The figure quoted by the prime minister is incorrect and highly misleading – it only refers to UK undergraduates of black Caribbean origin for a single year of entry. “In that year a full 22% of Oxford’s total student population came from ethnic minority backgrounds.” Oxford’s data showed that the next largest ethnic group after white students was students with an Indian background, of whom 77 were admitted. A total of 2,653 students were accepted for undergraduate study in 2009, of whom 2,316 were defined as white. Cameron was taking part in a 40-minute question-and-answer session with employees of the tea and coffee merchants Taylors of Harrogate. He was asked about tuition fees and the effect they might have on deterring students from poorer homes. He said that universities had to keep to strict rules if they wanted to charge the maximum fees and argued that the country’s top institutions needed to attract students from poorer backgrounds. But he added that the top universities did not have a good record when it came to admitting students from state schools, saying the numbers had gone down in the past 20 years. “That is a terrible record,” he told the audience. This statement was also attacked by the Russell Group of leading universities, which said the proportion of state-educated pupils at its institutions had grown by 9% since 1997. Dr Wendy Piatt, director general of the Russell Group, said: “This rate of growth exceeds the growth in the proportion of state school students across all UK universities, which was 8.6% in the same period.” However, 10 of the 16 English Russell Group universities are far below their benchmarks for state school access, the latest figures show. The benchmark reflects the proportion of pupils nationally who achieve the right entry qualifications. At Oxford, 54.3% of the undergraduate intake in 2009 went to state schools or colleges, compared with a benchmark of 70.2%. At Cambridge, 59.3% were state-educated, against a 70.4% benchmark. University of Oxford David Cameron Race issues Higher education Jeevan Vasagar guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …I don’t know about you, but I needed a laugh this weekend after all that’s happened last week so I give you Jon Stewart’s reaction to the news that Glenn Beck is leaving his 5PM show. Here’s Part II. Beck, the Birthers and the Mayans. And here’s a little more: SNL spoofed FOX & Friends . It wasn’t rip roaring, but it did have a few moments. Hating on Michele Obama’s obesity program, fear the Mexicans and ‘anchor babies.’
Continue reading …