On his 3PM ET hour show on MSNBC on Wednesday, host Martin Bashir enthusiastically reacted to President Obama's budget speech: “'We will invest in the future of America,' that's what President Obama just said in a much-anticipated speech on the budget…. He offered a series of broad proposals and said it's time for the wealthiest Americans to pay their way and share in taxes.” Moments later, White House correspondent Mike Viqueira joined Bashir and proclaimed: “..the President's speech was part soaring, speaking to the aspirations and character of a nation, if you will.” Bashir observed: “Mike, I don't want to sound as if I'm misrepresenting the President, but it appeared to me that he was suggesting that we can't be self-centered as far as fiscal policy is concerned. We can't simply slash programs everywhere without somehow expecting the wealthiest in society to contribute. Is that your impression?” Viqueira agreed and reiterated: “Well, the President did reach for, as I said, that soaring sort of rhetoric that speaks to the basic aspirations of people and the beliefs of what America is. He said, 'It tells us' – the Ryan plan, talking about the Republican plan – 'It tells us we can't afford the America we believe in.' So the President sort of laid out his vision for America.” Near the end of the segment, Bashir remarked: “When I hear the current discussion about cutting spending, I'm reminded of what Margaret Thatcher in Britain during the 1980's, when she dismissed the idea of a civic society and she said that all she wanted to do was focus on individuals. Isn't that what we now have, a president who wants shared sacrifices, an opposition that's solely focused on cuts that would appear to hit the most vulnerable without any consideration for raising taxes?” Viqueira replied: “And that's what the President did. He's done this before, quotes Abraham Lincoln, as he points out, the first Republican president, saying that the idea here for American government is to help those who can't help themselves. And they really are trying to encourage the coming battle to be fought on that – those grounds.” In addition to praising Obama's speech, Bashir also slammed Republicans for criticizing the President: “Republicans didn't even wait for the President to make his speech today before coming out with a scathing review of his handling of the issue….I'm curious about the reaction of the White House to entertaining a group of Republicans to morning coffee and then to hear them come out and immediately trash the President's speech even before he's delivered it.” Here is a transcript of the April 13 exchange between Bashir and Viqueira: 3:00PM ET MARTIN BASHIR: 'We will invest in the future of America,' that's what President Obama just said in a much-anticipated speech on the budget and his plan to tackle the nation's mounting debt and deficits. He offered a series of broad proposals and said it's time for the wealthiest Americans to pay their way and share in taxes. BARACK OBAMA: In December I agreed to extend the tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans because it was the only way I could prevent a tax hike on middle class Americans. But we cannot afford $1 trillion worth of tax cuts for every millionaire and billionaire in our society. We can't afford it. And I refuse to renew them again. BASHIR: Republicans didn't even wait for the President to make his speech today before coming out with a scathing review of his handling of the issue. JOHN BOEHNER [REP. R-OH]: I have been pushing the President for months to engage in this discussion about our long-term fiscal mess. I'm glad that he's finally decided to engage in it. ERIC CANTOR [REP. R-VA]: This is vintage obama. He's been standing on the sidelines expecting the rest of us to make the tough decisions to lead this country. BASHIR: NBC's Mike Viqueira is live at the White House. And Luke Russert joins us live from Capitol Hill. Mike, can I begin with you? Before we discuss the President's speech, I'm curious about the reaction of the White House to entertaining a group of Republicans to morning coffee and then to hear them come out and immediately trash the President's speech even before he's delivered it. MIKE VIQUEIRA: Yeah, well, you know, Martin, I have to say part of that is sort of a set piece. I thought an interesting portion of the afternoon had to do with the fact that Paul Ryan, you saw his picture there, in the chiron over your shoulder, was sitting in the front row and the President spent a good amount of time absolutely bashing the plan that Paul Ryan has constructed, the actual detailed piece of legislation that's going to be on the House of Representatives' floor tomorrow and Friday. You know, the President's speech was part soaring, speaking to the aspirations and character of a nation, if you will. Part framework – and that word 'framework' should be emphasized, because White House officials on background have been using it over and over and over again today – it did not have sort of the granularity or details that would go with a legislative proposal. And part of it, and a significant part of it, really setting the President and Democrats apart from what Republicans are going to be doing and proposing and debating over the course of the next two days in the House of Representatives, specifically when it comes to tax reform. The President obviously feels the Republican plan is tilted more towards the wealthy. And Medicare, the valued but costly program for elderly, that the President accuses Paul Ryan and Republicans of trying to privatize. The President, again, a framework, he says $4 trillion in debt reduction over the course of the next 12 years, if these recommendations are followed. Reform of the tax code to make it simpler and fairer, not a great deal of detail, again, in a lot of these proposals. The White House does say that for every $3 in cuts there will be $1 in tax revenue. It comes with a fail-safe or trigger, if the ratio of debt exceeds a certain percentage of the Gross Domestic Product in this country. And it brings up an interesting point, too, Martin. Why are we having the discussion? Because the total national debt in this country, now $14.3 trillion, exceeds the yearly GDP of this country, $14.1 trillion. And that is part of what's driving the urgency of this discussion, Martin.
Continue reading …Mental health charities say disclosure will have huge impact after Catherine Zeta-Jones checks into clinic for five days No amount of PR spend could have brought Catherine Zeta-Jones the fund of sympathy and goodwill she has received after announcing she was being treated for bipolar disorder. Mental health charities congratulated her on her courage in speaking up, and even the red-top tabloids treated her with dignity. It’s only eight years since the Sun’s front page screamed, “Bonkers Bruno locked up”, after the former boxer Frank Bruno suffered a breakdown and was sectioned under the Mental Health Act. On Thursday the tone reserved for reporting Zeta-Jones’s illness was very different: “Bipolar Zeta in clinic five days – star’s depression after Michael’s cancer fight,” said a much more muted Sun. Zeta-Jones, 41, came to prominence 20 years ago in the bucolic TV comedy about the Larkin family, The Darling Buds of May. Born in Swansea to a seamstress mother and sweet factory-owning father, from the off she looked destined for Hollywood. And so it proved. Not only did she go on to star in movies such as The Mask of Zorro and Traffic, she also married leading Hollywood player Michael Douglas in 2000. They were the showbiz dream team, a source of endless stories (their 25-year age difference, their combined wealth, her looks, his drug addictions – and then there were the movies). They sold pictures of their marriage to OK! for £1.5m, and even that resulted in a dramatic court case when Hello! ran the pictures without permission. Zeta-Jones’s film career peaked in 2003 when she won the best supporting actress Oscar for her performance as Velma Kelly in Chicago. But there has been plenty of well-documented turbulence in her life too. In 2004 Dawnette Knight, who had been infatuated with Douglas, was jailed after stalking Zeta-Jones – she sent letters telling her she would die like John F Kennedy or Manson Family victim Sharon Tate. “This has affected me and it will affect me the rest of my life,” Zeta-Jones testified. “I felt like a ticking timebomb.” There were also rumours in 2007 that her marriage was creaking, and last August it was revealed that Douglas, with whom she has two children, had stage IV throat cancer. Even in her earlier 20s, there had been hints all was not well. In 1993 after splitting from Blue Peter presenter John Leslie, she said: “I get very lonely and think nobody wants me any more. I can’t take a bus or tube on my own any more. It terrifies me. I get all panicked.” Last year she admitted to fighting depression: “I try and stay positive because I don’t just bring myself down, I bring everyone else down.” This week Zeta-Jones issued a statement that she had spent five days in a psychiatric hospital in Connecticut being treated for bipolar disorder, also known as manic depression. She is said to have struggled with stress after Douglas’s cancer diagnosis. Her spokeswoman said: “After dealing with the stress of the past year, Catherine made the decision to check into a mental health facility for a brief stay to treat her bipolar II disorder.” The announcement that she is suffering from bipolar II – a form of manic depression in which the ups are not as high as with bipolar I – was welcomed by mental health organisations. In recent years, celebrities such as Stephen Fry, Paul Gascoigne and Ruby Wax have helped to normalise depression and bipolar disorder. Marjorie Wallace, chief executive of the mental health charity Sane, said: “[Zeta-Jones's announcement] will have a huge impact on [people] recognising mental illness is a condition that everyone can suffer from. The importance is for people to accept it’s a treatable illness rather than live with it for years so that they become more and more sucked into a downward spiral and at risk of suicide.” Bipolar disorder is estimated to affect up to 2.4 million people in the UK, and sufferers are estimated to be 10 times more likely to kill themselves than the rest of the population. The average time for seeking help is 4.5 years, and a US survey showed that it took an average of 10.2 years for correct diagnosis and treatment. Although bipolar disorder is often first experienced in the teens or 20s, trauma can often tip sufferers into a crisis. “I think with the diagnosis and accepting the need for treatment, Catherine will feel liberated and believe that things can improve,” Wallace said. “Whereas those with bipolar I tend to experience severe mania as well as severe depression, bipolar II presents more as depression, feelings of sadness, hopelessness and guilt.” Sue Baker, director of Time to Change, a campaign to end the discrimination surrounding mental health problems, said Zeta-Jones’s statement would make it easier for others to admit to their illness. “We already know the impact of Stephen Fry’s documentary and how that helped people discuss the issue more openly.” The danger, she said, is that members of the public start to believe depression or bipolar disorder is something only suffered by famous or creative people. “It can almost seem that this is the price of success, which is nonsense. Major life changes can have an impact on anybody’s mental health and wellbeing.” Time to Change and Sane say that while celebrities are more willing to publicise mental health problems, there is still a stigma in many walks of life. “We want to see people in key public positions coming forward, feeling more able to talk about it,” Baker said. “The former prime minister of Norway, Kjell Magne Bondevik, got re-elected with an even higher majority once he disclosed he’d had to step back for a couple of months because he’d been experiencing depression.” Yet for British politicians admitting to depression or bipolar disorder is still taboo. “A confidential survey carried out by the all-party parliamentary mental health group showed one in five politicians had experienced a mental health problem but how many of them have actually talked about it?” said Baker. “As the law stands at the moment if you’re a sitting MP and you get sectioned, you wouldn’t be able to remain an MP. For me that is the very height of discrimination.”Zeta-Jones, meanwhile, seems on the road to recovery after her brief stay in the Silver Hill clinic in Connecticut. Her spokeswoman said: “She’s feeling great and looking forward to starting work on her two upcoming films.” Catherine Zeta-Jones Michael Douglas Bipolar disorder Mental health Health United States Wales Simon Hattenstone guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media I was like many of us who were worried that President Obama wouldn’t draw a big enough contrast between the two parties and their ideals when he was getting ready to give his budget-deficit speech yesterday. I was pleasantly surprised that he did articulate some key differences for a change, including singling out Paul Ryan’s junk-science pathway to the destruction of Medicare budget. Paul Krugman has a good write-up , with many follow-ups to it . It was more of a political speech to me than anything else in my eyes. We do need to really get on our game more than ever when we see things like this report coming from Democrats. But the real treat for me was watching Krauthammer cry like a petulant child on Fox News. His newly anointed conservative star, Paul Ryan, (Wall Street’s BFF) was exposed as a fraud for putting out a plan that, first of all, wouldn’t do anything to significantly reduce the deficit, but would make it a huge risk if you were lucky enough to live until your 60s. Growing old has gotten more dangerous with plans like his and Obama didn’t hesitate to make that point clear. Here’s Charles totally losing his cool on Brett Baier’s FOX Show : Krauthammer: I thought it was a disgrace. I rarely heard a speech by a president so shallow, so hyper-partisan and so intellectually dishonest, outside the last couple of weeks of a presidential election where you are allowed to call your opponent anything short of a traitor. But, we’re a year-and-a-half away from Election Day and it was supposed to be a speech about policy. He didn’t even get to his own alternative until more than halfway through the speech. And when he did, he threw out numbers suspended in mid-air with nothing under them with all kinds of goals and guidelines and triggers that mean nothing. The speech was really about and entirely an attack on the [Rep. Paul] Ryan plan.” Charles then disingenuously compared tax rates and thought Ryan’s plan wasn’t so bad because his tax rates for corporations was 2% higher than Bowles-Simpson report which Ryan voted against. And then he pulled another whopper out of the ozone when he talked about the Bush tax cuts. “I’m going to give you one example of how dishonest it was – he went on and on how the Republicans want to steal from your grandma to lower taxes on the rich,” Krauthammer continued. “And he talked about the Bush tax cuts and how much he is going to stand on the bridge and oppose any extension which is what he knows how to do. He has done it over and over for the last six years. The Ryan plan is not about the Bush tax cuts. It transcends them. It’s what the deficit — what Obama’s own commission recommended, strip out loopholes and lower rates for everyone. It’s not about whether it’s the Bush rates or Clinton rates. It’s a whole new approach by which the Simpson-Bowles Commission recommended itself. In fact, Bowles had recommended in one of its scenarios of a high rate of 23 percent. Ryan is at 25 percent. Obama did this knowing that this is a way to play to his base. It was a speech that was quite remarkable in how demagogic it was and I say that with all due respect.” Ryan’s plan is nothing but tax cuts for the rich and Ryan is stealing from Grandma because, by turning Medicare into a voucher program, seniors would be forced to pay a tremendous amount of extra money that most working-class seniors wouldn’t have to even pay for their health care, let alone having to then shop around and find some kind of a doctor-deal first. And on the medicaid front, a program that many seniors also have would be gutted with his block grant proposal because it does nothing for rising costs of health care and rations off the amount of care that could be given to medicaid recipients. Ryan has now officially put the GOP on the defensive over Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security since Obama used his bully-pulpit to highlight these points. We can’t depend on the beltway media to take a real hard look at his ludicrous ideas since they think it’s bold even if it’s ridiculous so the President has to do it and he did. John Boehner cosigned Ryan’s plan yesterday as will every GOP presidential nominee moving forward, so they are stuck with it. The optics of Ryan’s plan reminds me of the Sennsenbrenner Bill , which turned the entire Latino community against Republicans. Obviously, hate-talk radio and Fox News personalities added fuel to the fire during the immigration bill under Bush as things moved forward. Latinos voted in strong numbers for George Bush in 2004, but were shocked by this piece of legislation and have turned against Republicans ever since. Will the same happen to seniors?
Continue reading …Mountains in Gloucestershire, London buses driving on the right – and that’s before you get to the dialogue There are movies so bad that they transcend awfulness. Ed Wood’s Plan 9 from Outer Space and Glen or Glenda? perhaps, or Troll 2 . And then there is William and Kate: The Movie. Coming to a DVD outlet near you shortly. So bad it’s awful, toe-curlingly, teeth-furringly, pillow-bitingly ghastly. You begin to wonder what the happy young couple have done to deserve this. It will probably be a smash. Perhaps the PR handout gives it away: “Shot entirely in Los Angeles and inspired by true events.” That might account for the mountains in the backdrop to a pheasant shoot in Gloucestershire, buses driving on the right in London, the Middletons’ modern house transformed into a Californian Tudor mansion and the famous dragon boat race training that Kate Middleton once undertook on the Thames at Chiswick being transposed to the High Sierra. The film has sparked a worldwide media frenzy, according to its promoters. This is the Wedding of the Year as imagined in Wichita or Wyoming, with dialogue so authentic it follows you round the room. As in all the best plays, they tell each other things they must already know. “I say, Wills,” says Prince Harry. “I am not the heir. I am just the spare.” “You do realise this is the 21st century?” Kate expostulates to her etiquette coach. “In your world, perhaps, but not in his,” said coach replies portentously, and a million heads will nod knowingly, from Houston to Hawaii. Monarchists abroad may be shocked when William informs his intended that half the country loves his family and the other half thinks they are irrelevant throwbacks – a little bit of social comment there – but they will soon be back on track when he adds reassuringly: “My mother was one of the people. She tried to change the monarchy.” Kate replies: “We’ll still be us. Nothing will come between us.” At which point some in the audience at the film’s preview unaccountably began to titter. Prince William – aka “the Royal Beau” – is played by young New Zealander Nico Evers-Swindell, whose acting varies from plain wooden to teak-like, which may not be so far from the original, but is somehow less engaging. Who could blame him, saddled with lines such as: “I am sorry … I just need some space.” And air, by the looks of it.Middleton – whom everyone in the movie, including Prince Charles, calls Kate, unlike in real life where she’s known to friends and family as Catherine –is played by Camilla Luddington, an actor whose last part was as a teenage drink-driver in CSI. Luddington was apparently brought up in Berkshire, like her alter-ego, but, if so, she’s clearly spent too long in the US because her accent is more Berkeley than Bucklebury. Ben Cross, who once strode across Chariots of Fire, gives us his Prince Charles and he has certainly got the cufflink-fiddling off to a T. It is the little things that jar. Like the German spy in the old war movie who gives himself away when he doesn’t know who won the Cup final in 1938, or the ex-boyfriend who announces he’s going to “the college of law at Oxford”, or the reference to the happy couple’s alma mater as St Andrew’s College: apparently it’s a school, too. Perhaps the Scottish university had an inkling of what the film would be like and sensibly did not let the cast and crew anywhere near: there are only aerial shots of the town, interspersed curiously with an overhead view of Oxford. At ground level the university looks suspiciously more like an Ivy League campus. The tabloids and paparazzi get it in the neck for hounding Middleton, which is odd coming from a film which makes a virtue of its intrusiveness. Fortunately the Queen does not appear – perhaps Helen Mirren was too expensive for the £3m budget – probably saving her from telling her granddaughter-in-law-elect to: “Get with the programme, sister.” As the happy couple’s love entwines against a sunset as livid orange as any in Gone with the Wind, there will not be a dry eye in the house. But possibly not for the reasons the makers suppose. William and Kate: The Movie is released on DVD on 25 April Royal wedding Monarchy Weddings Kate Middleton Prince William United States Stephen Bates guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Opponents say leaked document proves sister company of pro-AV backer ERS could profit financially from yes vote The two camps on either side of the referendum on the alternative vote are trading blows over whether the group funding the yes campaign stands to gain financially from a switch to AV. Campaigners for a no vote obtained a leaked document which they said proved one of the yes campaign’s major backers was reliant on a company that could profit financially from a yes vote on 5 May. Allegations by the no campaign that their opponents have a conflict of interest have dogged the debate all week, galvanised by an intervention by George Osborne on Monday when he suggested the yes campaign’s funding model was “dodgy”. He was reprimanded by lawyers acting for the yes campaign who said this was “wholly untrue”. Ed Howker, a journalist, obtained what appears to be an internal risk assessment by the Electoral Reform Society – the principal donor to the Yes to AV campaign – in which the ERS acknowledges that the targeting of its funding relationship was a “medium” likelihood with a “high impact”. In a section detailing the “issue” the body notes that it is reliant on cash advances from its sister company Electoral Reform Services Limited (ERSL) about which it writes: “It is possible that ERSL will profit as a result of a YES vote (increased business opportunities).” Under a heading marked “risk” it writes: “Damage to reputation; could make us look unsavoury even if unfounded. Negative effect on donations levels if story becomes ‘we are rich’? ERSL fear that negative publicity might affect union clients, Conservative party or other ‘no’ supporters which in turn, might affect future dividends.” The no campaign says the ERS has given £1.1m to the pro-AV campaign and claimed that the society and its subsidiaries had received more than £15m in contracts from the public purse over the past three years. The no campaign also charges that the ERSL would provide new telling machines for processing AV ballots if there is a switch to the new system. The lawyers Lewis Silkin said on Monday: “This is wholly untrue. Electoral Reform Services Limited (the business arm of ERS) earns revenue in the public election administration area from three types of contract. Printing of ballot papers and the producing of voting packs for postal voters; printing and mailing of the annual canvas return forms and processing telephone and internet responses. “Provision of election management software through its subsidiary Xpress software solutions. The form of voting system upon which parliamentary elections are based is entirely irrelevant to the provision of any of these services. A change in the voting system would, therefore, have absolutely no impact on any of the revenue earned by the ERSL.” George Eustice, the Tory MP co-ordinating the no campaign, said: “Yesterday, lawyers for the Electoral Reform Society issued a threatening letter in a bid to discourage the media from reporting their conflict of interest in this referendum. Now it turns out their own internal documents highlight that just such a conflict of interest exists and that they have wilfully misled British voters and the media. “This appears to be a disgraceful attempt to influence the result of the referendum just as postal votes land on people’s doormats. This is not how we do politics in this country.” Responding to the publication of the leaked document, the Electoral Reform Society said: “This was a scenario planning document anticipating lines of attack we’ve come under from the no campaign. ERSL is an independent company and have made perfectly clear they won’t make a penny from a yes vote.” Alternative vote Electoral reform Allegra Stratton guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Mother of Zainab al-Khawaja – a 27-year-old protesting against treatment of father – says she is struggling to stand up Britain and the European Union have heaped diplomatic pressure on Bahrain over the alleged killing of pro-democracy activists in custody, while the health of a hunger striker protesting at the beating and arrest of her dissident father has deteriorated markedly. In a meeting with Interior Minister Shaikh Rashid bin Abdulla Al Khalifa, the British ambassador to Bahrain, Jamie Bowden, raised concerns over the deaths of four dissident prisoners in the last week. Catherine Ashton, the EU’s high representative for foreign affairs, speaking through a spokesman also called on the Bahrain regime to immediately release all those who have been detained for peacefully expressing themselves. Ashton announced she is to visit Bahrain next week and her spokesman called on the authorities to “investigate all recent events which have resulted in loss of life and injuries”. The high-level interventions follow what pro-democracy activists in Bahrain complain has been a period of minimal censure from Europe and the US of the renewed crackdown. They came as Zainab al-Khawaja, a 27-year-old mother on hunger strike following the beating and arrest of her father, Abdulhadi al-Khawaja – a prominent human rights activist – along with her husband and brother-in-law, saw her health slump. She had been speaking out against the government’s treatment of her family through the media and her Twitter blog but she struggled to stand up, vomited and could no longer breastfeed her 18-month-old daughter, according to her mother. “I asked if I could put some sugar in her water because I can see her suffering and her daughter is crying for milk because she can’t breastfeed her. She said no,” said Khadija al-Khawaja, 52. “She is just sleeping. I go and wake her up, she opens her eyes and speaks to me and says she is OK. I told her you have a little girl whose father is not here and if anything happens to you … but she feels she needs to do something. She is very angry and very upset about what is happening.” The family has received no information about the fate of Abdulhadi, Zainab’s husband Wafu Almajed or her brother-in-law Hussein Ahmed. But there was hope for her uncle who was arrested three weeks earlier, when his wife was called to bring clothes for him to the military court building, though she was not allowed to see him. Abdulhadi was beaten and arrested after he denounced the King of Bahrain and called for him to be put on trial. It is thought the two other men were arrested because they were with him at the time, but were not the targets. The Bahraini government has widened its crackdown on dissent by preparing a case to dissolve Al Wefaq, a registered political society that previously held 18 of the 40 seats in the chamber of deputies before it withdrew in protest at the government’s handling of demonstrations in February. It is also trying to shut down the Islamic Action Society, another registered society. A spokesman for the British foreign office denounced the move as “a backward step for reform” and said “the best way out of the situation is through inclusive dialogue”. Kareem Fakhwiri, a member of Al Wefaq, was buried on Wednesday after he died in police custody and suffered extensive bruising. “We are deeply concerned by the many reports of human rights abuses in Bahrain,” said a foreign office spokesman. “We are particularly worried by the deaths of four prisoners in the past week. Our ambassador raised these deaths with the minister of interior on 14 April. We call on the government to investigate them fully and transparently and we continue to urge the Bahraini authorities to act in accordance with the law and to meet international standards for the treatment of detainees.” Khadija al-Khawaja said she was increasingly afraid the authorities would call to announce her husband’s death, after she visited Kobra Fakhwiri, the widow of Kareem Fakhwiri. Bahrain Arab and Middle East unrest Protest Human rights Middle East Robert Booth guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …enlarge What is the matter with Virginia teachers? What possessed this one to decide re-enacting a slave auction would be a good idea? I kid you not. First fetus dolls in their elementary schools, now this . AngryBlackLady has a few things to say , mostly in response to a fairly clueless and tepid defense of dear Ms. Boyle over at Mediaite: The obvious problem is separating the kids — obvious problem is obvious. But there’s another problem — the Charleston Problem , and that is, the narrative regarding the reasons this country fought itself in the Civil War have been coopted by idiots who like to put on their fanciest Confederate gear and pretend shoot one another . They see it as a celebration of history. I see it as a yearning for a Simpler Time, when it was all mint juleps, and seersucker, and field negroes. It makes me exceedingly uncomfortable. I think AngryBlackLady is putting that mildly. In the ABC interview with the kids , you can almost see them defending their teacher, which is somewhat heartbreaking to me — that they would be in a position first to be humiliated in that fashion, and then feel as though they needed to gentle-down what was done in that school that day. And more to the point, it’s beyond clueless. It indicates an attitude that doesn’t think one is the same flesh and blood as “those people.” This isn’t political correctness. This is taking a painful episode in history and asking children to re-enact it as a ‘learning experience’, with skin color determining what place in the re-enactment they will assume. Someone who thinks like that is also separating “those children” from the others in her own mind as a matter of course. It isn’t as though elementary schools in Virginia haven’t had similar incidents over the years. There is a pattern here that continues to go unaddressed : Last year, a Jacox Elementary teacher who anointed students with “holy oil” in the classroom resigned after a parent complained about the teacher’s religious actions. The division determined the teacher violated the school system’s instructional curriculum as well as policies and laws related to the separation of church and state. Also last year, two teachers at Norcom High School were placed on leave for using materials in the classroom that were endorsed by an anarchist group and an organization that backs legalized marijuana . Both received letters of reprimand for not receiving permission to use the materials in class and returned to their jobs. An elementary guidance counselor who distributed 80 to 100 human fetus figurines to students last year at Oakwood Elementary resigned after being put on leave. The school’s principal was removed from her post and reassigned elsewhere as an assistant principal. This didn’t just happen in Virginia last week, either. In Ohio last month another teacher decided a “re-enactment” was in order: Nikko Burton, a 10-year-old student at Chapelfield Elementary in Ohio, says he was humiliated by his teacher when she tried to demonstrate what it was like to be a slave on an auction block. Burton, one of two black students in his class, was chosen to be a slave. Students who were the “masters” inspected the “slaves” to see if they would be able workers. Meanwhile, confederate themes continue to grow and proliferate more than ever. 150 years later, the Civil War rages on, to all of our detriment. Perhaps it would help these teachers in Virginia and Ohio to remember better if they were forced to wear a big scarlet “B” (for bigot) instead of just apologizing.
Continue reading …New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof joined the “tax me, please,” brigade in his Thursday column that is sure to win him new fans the day before tax day: “ Raise America’s Taxes .” President Obama in his speech on Wednesday confronted a topic that is harder to address seriously in public than sex or flatulence: America needs higher taxes. That ugly truth looms over today’s budget battles, but politicians have mostly preferred to run from reality. Mr. Obama’s speech was excellent not only for its content but also because he didn’t insult our intelligence. There is no single reason for today’s budget mess, but it’s worth remembering that the last time our budget was in the black was in the Clinton administration. That’s a broad hint that one sensible way to overcome our difficulties would be to revert to tax rates more or less as they were under President Clinton. That single step would solve three-quarters of the deficit for the next five years or so. So would cutting spending levels to the Clinton era, for that matter. Kudos to Mr. Obama for boldly stating that truth in his speech — even if he did focus only on taxes for the very wealthiest. I also thought he was right to say that we need spending cuts — including in our defense budget . Mr. Obama didn’t say so, but the United States accounts for almost as much military spending as the entire rest of the world put together. (A side note: Kristof wants cuts in defense spending while also being a hawk for bombing Libya, a country the U.S. has been at war with for 26 days. The late Times columnist R.W. Apple famously declared Afghanistan a quagmire on October 31, 2001, day 24 of our intervention there. On Monday, reporter David Sanger more mildly referred to the conflict in Libya as a “stalemate.”) Kristof concluded: Ever since Walter Mondale publicly committed hara-kiri in 1984 by telling voters that he would raise their taxes, politicians have run from fiscal reality. As baby boomers age and require Social Security and Medicare, escapism will no longer suffice. We need to have a frank national discussion of painful steps ahead, and since I’m not a politician, let me be perfectly clear: raise my taxes!
Continue reading …Newspaper expected to return to newsstands on 8 May but no reprieve for sister title the Daily Sport The Sunday Sport is expected to begin publishing again in early May, with the paper’s founder David Sullivan on the verge of buying it from administrators for less than £1m. A contract for the deal for the Sunday Sport – but not sister title the Daily Sport – is understood to have been issued although Sullivan, the West Ham co-owner, has not yet signed off on it. However, one source familiar with the deal said it is “highly likely” to go through, with Sullivan buying the Sunday Sport for less than £1m. The Sunday Sport is expected to return to newsstands on 8 May, just over a month after previous owner Sport Media Group ceased publication of the paper and its daily counterpart. SMG ceased trading and put the papers up for sale on Friday 1 April , after admitting that an “insufficient recovery” since poor sales during the poor weather at the end of 2010 had left it cash-strapped and “uncertain of support” from its bank. Following unsuccessful talks with Royal Bank of Scotland, the company appointed BDO as administrator for the business. One of BDO’s first moves was to make the papers’ 80 employees redundant . A BDO spokeswoman said: “Negotiations are ongoing. We are not in a position to announce a sale or confirm a sale.” Sullivan launched the Sunday Sport in 1986 and its daily sister title five years later. He sold his 50% stake in the business in December 2007, in a deal that valued the Sport papers at about £40m. But in 2009 Sullivan saved the business from going under by loaning it £1.68m in return for a 9.9% stake. • To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly “for publication”. • To get the latest media news to your desktop or mobile, follow MediaGuardian on Twitter and Facebook . Newspapers Newspapers & magazines Media business David Sullivan Mark Sweney guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Newspaper expected to return to newsstands on 8 May but no reprieve for sister title the Daily Sport The Sunday Sport is expected to begin publishing again in early May, with the paper’s founder David Sullivan on the verge of buying it from administrators for less than £1m. A contract for the deal for the Sunday Sport – but not sister title the Daily Sport – is understood to have been issued although Sullivan, the West Ham co-owner, has not yet signed off on it. However, one source familiar with the deal said it is “highly likely” to go through, with Sullivan buying the Sunday Sport for less than £1m. The Sunday Sport is expected to return to newsstands on 8 May, just over a month after previous owner Sport Media Group ceased publication of the paper and its daily counterpart. SMG ceased trading and put the papers up for sale on Friday 1 April , after admitting that an “insufficient recovery” since poor sales during the poor weather at the end of 2010 had left it cash-strapped and “uncertain of support” from its bank. Following unsuccessful talks with Royal Bank of Scotland, the company appointed BDO as administrator for the business. One of BDO’s first moves was to make the papers’ 80 employees redundant . A BDO spokeswoman said: “Negotiations are ongoing. We are not in a position to announce a sale or confirm a sale.” Sullivan launched the Sunday Sport in 1986 and its daily sister title five years later. He sold his 50% stake in the business in December 2007, in a deal that valued the Sport papers at about £40m. But in 2009 Sullivan saved the business from going under by loaning it £1.68m in return for a 9.9% stake. • To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly “for publication”. • To get the latest media news to your desktop or mobile, follow MediaGuardian on Twitter and Facebook . Newspapers Newspapers & magazines Media business David Sullivan Mark Sweney guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …