Alleged members of Italian vice ring said to have procured young women bicker in public, creating problems for defence lawyers The alleged members of a vice ring who are claimed to have procured young women for Italy’s prime minister, Silvio Berlusconi, have fallen out spectacularly, creating a potentially grave problem for his defence. Berlusconi denies paying an underage prostitute and then abusing his position to cover up the alleged offence in a trial that began earlier this month. Three of his associates are also under investigation in related proceedings, on suspicion of aiding and abetting prostitution, juvenile and otherwise. They include Nicole Minetti, an Anglo-Italian dental hygienist and former TV variety dancer whom Berlusconi made a regional parliamentarian. Also under investigation are Emilio Fede, who presents a news programme on one of Berlusconi’s TV channels, and Lele Mora, a showbusiness talent scout. Minetti’s lawyer handed the prosecutors a document outlining her defence on Monday night. According to reports, the document blames the other suspects for introducing the prime minister to Karima El Mahroug, the then 17-year-old Moroccan runaway known as Ruby who is at the heart of the case. Minetti and her lawyer both denied the reports. “I am not accusing either Emilio Fede or Lele Mora,” Minetti said. But that was not Fede’s view. After being guided through a summary by Minetti’s lawyer, he said: “The memorandum submitted by Nicole Minetti is bullshit … I deny it.” Interviewed by a local TV station, Fede complicated matters further by accusing Mora. “Karima El Mahroug – known as Ruby – got to Arcore [Berlusconi's home near Milan] thanks to Lele Mora,” he said. Mora then accused Fede of having fallen into a trap laid by Minetti’s lawyer. The TV presenter’s involvement stems from a beauty contest in Sicily at which he was a judge and Mahroug a contestant. Fede told his interviewer he had not seen her again after that until one evening at Arcore. Mahroug, he said, had come to Milan on her own initiative and been introduced, through a third party, to Mora. It has been reported that Mora helped her get a job as a nightclub bellydancer. Mahroug herself, who denies being a prostitute, tells a different story – that she was taken to Arcore by Fede in a limousine belonging to Berlusconi’s network, accompanied by police outriders. Minetti, Fede and Mora all deny the offences for which they are being investigated. Silvio Berlusconi Italy Europe Prostitution John Hooper guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Alleged members of Italian vice ring said to have procured young women bicker in public, creating problems for defence lawyers The alleged members of a vice ring who are claimed to have procured young women for Italy’s prime minister, Silvio Berlusconi, have fallen out spectacularly, creating a potentially grave problem for his defence. Berlusconi denies paying an underage prostitute and then abusing his position to cover up the alleged offence in a trial that began earlier this month. Three of his associates are also under investigation in related proceedings, on suspicion of aiding and abetting prostitution, juvenile and otherwise. They include Nicole Minetti, an Anglo-Italian dental hygienist and former TV variety dancer whom Berlusconi made a regional parliamentarian. Also under investigation are Emilio Fede, who presents a news programme on one of Berlusconi’s TV channels, and Lele Mora, a showbusiness talent scout. Minetti’s lawyer handed the prosecutors a document outlining her defence on Monday night. According to reports, the document blames the other suspects for introducing the prime minister to Karima El Mahroug, the then 17-year-old Moroccan runaway known as Ruby who is at the heart of the case. Minetti and her lawyer both denied the reports. “I am not accusing either Emilio Fede or Lele Mora,” Minetti said. But that was not Fede’s view. After being guided through a summary by Minetti’s lawyer, he said: “The memorandum submitted by Nicole Minetti is bullshit … I deny it.” Interviewed by a local TV station, Fede complicated matters further by accusing Mora. “Karima El Mahroug – known as Ruby – got to Arcore [Berlusconi's home near Milan] thanks to Lele Mora,” he said. Mora then accused Fede of having fallen into a trap laid by Minetti’s lawyer. The TV presenter’s involvement stems from a beauty contest in Sicily at which he was a judge and Mahroug a contestant. Fede told his interviewer he had not seen her again after that until one evening at Arcore. Mahroug, he said, had come to Milan on her own initiative and been introduced, through a third party, to Mora. It has been reported that Mora helped her get a job as a nightclub bellydancer. Mahroug herself, who denies being a prostitute, tells a different story – that she was taken to Arcore by Fede in a limousine belonging to Berlusconi’s network, accompanied by police outriders. Minetti, Fede and Mora all deny the offences for which they are being investigated. Silvio Berlusconi Italy Europe Prostitution John Hooper guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Booby-trapped device fails to explode after bogus 999 call in which a man claimed to have heard a woman in distress Police in Northern Ireland answering a bogus call had a lucky escape after being lured to a booby-trapped bomb that failed to explode. Officers were responding to a 999 call in which a man claimed to have heard a woman in distress in a wooded area off Annadale embankment in south Belfast. But when they arrived at the scene, at about midnight, they found a bomb and wire attached to the gate they passed through to search the area. Superintendent Chris Noble confirmed that a viable device capable of causing multiple deaths was discovered. He said police believed the “sophisticated and substantial” bomb had failed to detonate. Police received the bogus call at 11.50pm on Monday and officers were sent to the scene, which is on a busy road and is opposite allotments that are often in use. When officers arrived at the scene they realised it was empty and only then discovered the device attached to the gate. Army technical officers were called to the scene at about 1.30am and a police helicopter was launched. Detectives have appealed for anyone with information to come forward. Police have been on high alert for attacks by dissident republicans after the death of Constable Ronan Kerr in April after a bomb exploded under his car in Omagh, County Tyrone. In a subsequent incident, hundreds of motorists were allowed to drive past a van containing a 500lb bomb in Newry. The underpass on the main Belfast to Dublin road was closed on 7 April after the suspect vehicle was found by police, but traffic cones barring entry to the road were later removed. Officers said the cordon had been removed by motorists. Dissidents are believed to have stepped up activity before the 5 May assembly elections. Northern Ireland Crime guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Joint force HQ to advise rebels indicates serious nature of move, while Gaddafi’s communications targeted by Nato A joint British-French military team of advisers is to be sent to Benghazi in a move that is likely to lead to accusations of mission creep. Separately, Nato has said its missiles have targeted Gaddafi’s communications network. The moves came after rebels warned that the besieged town of Misrata would fall within days. The UK-French team will advise the rebels on intelligence-gathering, logistics, and communications. In an indication of the serious nature of the move, the team will be run by a joint force headquarters, the Guardian has learned. Officials stress that the team consists of advisers, rather than trainers, and that the move does not involve arming the rebels. There are no plans for the team to go to Misrata, the officials added. William Hague, the foreign secretary, said in a statement that the team “will enable the UK to build on the work already being undertaken to support and advise the NTC [National Transitional Council] on how to better protect civilians”. He added: “In particular they will advise the NTC on how to improve their military organisational structures, communications and logistics, including how best to distribute humanitarian aid and deliver medical assistance.” Hague said the British section of the team will consist of “experienced British military officers”. UK special forces would not be involved, officials said. Hague said that the deployment was “fully within the terms of UNSCR 1973 both in respect of civilian protection and its provision expressly ruling out a foreign occupation force on Libyan soil”. Meanwhile, British, French, and Danish aircraft have extended Nato’s targets in Libya to include small satellite communications systems and telephone exchanges, officials said. The strikes, which took place over the past two days, were described as representing a clear “shift” in targeting policy, they said. The British submarine HMS Triumph, returning to the Mediterranean after restocking with Tomahawk missiles, is understood to have fired a number of cruise missiles at Libyan communications targets over the past two days. Oana Lungescu, Nato’s chief spokesperson, told a briefing at the alliance’s Brussels headquarters that the coalition had flown more than 2,800 sorties, 1,000 a week, of which half were strike sorties. Brigadier General Mark van Uhm, Nato’s chief of allied operations, described the situation on the ground in Libya as “fluid and changing constantly”. Ammuniton bunkers, radars, rocket launchers, and tanks, as well as communications structure had been desrtroyed, “but nothing indicated he had any intention of disengaging his forces”. Van Uhm said over the past 36 hours, Nato air strikes had aimed at degrading Gaddafi’s “capacity to command and control, facilities and communcate with his forces”. The strikes “will continue until [there is] a clear signal civilians are no longer under threat”, he added. The general said Nato strikes last night hit mobile rocket launchers and armoured vehicles advancing near Misrata. He added: “But there is limit what can be achieved with air power to stop fighting in a city”. Libya Arab and Middle East unrest Middle East Muammar Gaddafi Nato Military Richard Norton-Taylor guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Pursuit of alleged filesharers was ‘amateurish and slipshod’ and ‘brought the legal profession into disrepute’, judge rules The London-based lawyer at the heart of a huge row over internet piracy, Andrew Crossley, breached the solicitors code of conduct with his method of accusing people of illegal filesharing, a judge has ruled. ACS:Law, the law firm created by Crossley, sent tens of thousands of letters demanding “settlement” payments of about £500 from people it accused of illegal downloading. The firm apparently recouped hundreds of thousands of pounds from the controversial “speculative invoicing” scheme before it finally brought 27 cases to court earlier this year. However, Crossley tried to halt the trial before he had to bring any evidence. Ruling in the Patents County Court in London on Monday, Judge Birss QC described ACS:Law’s pursuit of illegal filesharers as “amateurish and slipshod” and said it had “brought the legal profession into disrepute”. Birss said Crossley had breached the solicitors code of conduct because he was responsible for the licence agreement between Media CAT and the original copyright holders, and stood to profit from it. The code of conduct states that “you must not enter into an arrangement to receive a contingency fee for work done in prosecuting or defending any contentious proceedings” before the court. The judge said: “I am quite satisfied to the standard necessary for this stage of a wasted costs application that Mr Crossley is responsible for the basic agreements [the licence agreements between Media CAT and original copyright holders] and has thereby acted in breach of the solicitors rule 2.04. “In my judgment, the combination of Mr Crossley’s revenue sharing arrangements and his service of the notices of discontinuance serves to illustrate the dangers of such a revenue sharing arrangement and has, prima facie, brought the legal profession into disrepute. It may be better placed under the revenue sharing heading in this judgment but it is, prima facie, improper conduct in any event.” Crossley is due to face the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal later this year. A spokeswoman for the Solicitors Regulation Authority, which finalised proceedings against Crossley in March, said on Monday: “Today’s judgment supports our concerns about the effects this sort of correspondence has on the public.” Crossley could also now have to pay up to £100,000 in legal costs to those he accused of illegal filesharing. One solicitor representing five of the defendants says its bill is £90,000. The solicitor now has about 25 days to appeal to the high court to overturn the costs order. However, Birss on Monday refused his application to appeal. Birss said: “ACS:Law’s conduct was chaotic and lamentable. Documents which plainly should have been provided [as evidence before the court] were not provided. This was not the behaviour of a solicitor advancing a normal piece of litigation.” Michael Forrester, a solicitor for the law firm Ralli which represented some of the 27 defendants accused by ACS:Law, described how they “cannot possibly have uploaded or downloaded copyright protected material”. In February, ACS:Law announced that it would no longer pursue copyright litigations after Crossley claimed death threats were causing an ” immense hassle ” to his family. ACS:Law was catapulted into the spotlight in September last year when the personal details of thousands of internet users leaked from its website in the aftermath of an attack on by the hacker group Anonymous. The information commissioner is still investigating the leak, and could hand ACS:Law a £500,000 fine if it is found to have stored the details insecurely. Filesharing Internet Digital Economy Act Computing Josh Halliday guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Pursuit of alleged filesharers was ‘amateurish and slipshod’ and ‘brought the legal profession into disrepute’, judge rules The London-based lawyer at the heart of a huge row over internet piracy, Andrew Crossley, breached the solicitors code of conduct with his method of accusing people of illegal filesharing, a judge has ruled. ACS:Law, the law firm created by Crossley, sent tens of thousands of letters demanding “settlement” payments of about £500 from people it accused of illegal downloading. The firm apparently recouped hundreds of thousands of pounds from the controversial “speculative invoicing” scheme before it finally brought 27 cases to court earlier this year. However, Crossley tried to halt the trial before he had to bring any evidence. Ruling in the Patents County Court in London on Monday, Judge Birss QC described ACS:Law’s pursuit of illegal filesharers as “amateurish and slipshod” and said it had “brought the legal profession into disrepute”. Birss said Crossley had breached the solicitors code of conduct because he was responsible for the licence agreement between Media CAT and the original copyright holders, and stood to profit from it. The code of conduct states that “you must not enter into an arrangement to receive a contingency fee for work done in prosecuting or defending any contentious proceedings” before the court. The judge said: “I am quite satisfied to the standard necessary for this stage of a wasted costs application that Mr Crossley is responsible for the basic agreements [the licence agreements between Media CAT and original copyright holders] and has thereby acted in breach of the solicitors rule 2.04. “In my judgment, the combination of Mr Crossley’s revenue sharing arrangements and his service of the notices of discontinuance serves to illustrate the dangers of such a revenue sharing arrangement and has, prima facie, brought the legal profession into disrepute. It may be better placed under the revenue sharing heading in this judgment but it is, prima facie, improper conduct in any event.” Crossley is due to face the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal later this year. A spokeswoman for the Solicitors Regulation Authority, which finalised proceedings against Crossley in March, said on Monday: “Today’s judgment supports our concerns about the effects this sort of correspondence has on the public.” Crossley could also now have to pay up to £100,000 in legal costs to those he accused of illegal filesharing. One solicitor representing five of the defendants says its bill is £90,000. The solicitor now has about 25 days to appeal to the high court to overturn the costs order. However, Birss on Monday refused his application to appeal. Birss said: “ACS:Law’s conduct was chaotic and lamentable. Documents which plainly should have been provided [as evidence before the court] were not provided. This was not the behaviour of a solicitor advancing a normal piece of litigation.” Michael Forrester, a solicitor for the law firm Ralli which represented some of the 27 defendants accused by ACS:Law, described how they “cannot possibly have uploaded or downloaded copyright protected material”. In February, ACS:Law announced that it would no longer pursue copyright litigations after Crossley claimed death threats were causing an ” immense hassle ” to his family. ACS:Law was catapulted into the spotlight in September last year when the personal details of thousands of internet users leaked from its website in the aftermath of an attack on by the hacker group Anonymous. The information commissioner is still investigating the leak, and could hand ACS:Law a £500,000 fine if it is found to have stored the details insecurely. Filesharing Internet Digital Economy Act Computing Josh Halliday guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Labour leader says ‘unravelling’ fees policy could see places cut to make up funding shortfall At least 10% of university places for undergraduates will have to be cut to fund the coalition’s “unravelling” tuition fee reforms, the leader of the Labour party has warned. Ed Miliband said ministers would be forced to axe 36,000 full-time places each year. MPs voted in December to raise tuition fees from £3,350 a year to £6,000 in 2012, and up to £9,000 in “exceptional cases”. Willetts initially predicted that the average fee would be £7,500. He later revised that to £7,500-8,000. However, almost three-quarters of universities that have announced their tuition fee plans have opted to charge the maximum £9,000 for at least some of their degree courses from 2012. The average fee of those that have made their plans public currently stands at £8,679.20. This leaves the Treasury with a multi-million-pound blackhole. The initial cost of students’ fees is borne by the government, which pays the fee for each student in the form of a loan. The government then recovers its money once a student has graduated and is earning more than £21,000. Labour said one way for the government to claw back the higher upfront cost would be to cut student numbers. The party said House of Commons library figures showed that if average fees were £8,500 in 2014-15, the government would be short of £450m. To keep public spending constant, funds equivalent to 36,000 undergraduate full-time places would have to be lost, Labour said. Miliband told a press conference on Tuesday that the government’s tuition fee policy was “now unravelling”. “It will cost students more. It will now cost the taxpayer more. And it may cost thousands of young people their place at university,” he said. Figures from the House of Commons library published last month showed that if the average fee was £8,600, the government will have to spend £960m more in the next four years. If it is only slightly higher, at £7,900, it is £340m extra. But if the average is £8,900, the government will have to pay out an extra £1.23bn. Miliband made his comments prior to a visit to Leicester – following in the footsteps of Nick Clegg who, before the general election, made the “solemn promise” to oppose any increase in tuition fees during a visit to the city’s De Montfort University. He accused the government of a “second betrayal” and said David Cameron had broken a promise that £9,000 fees would be an exception. “Nick Clegg promised not to raise tuition fees, and now David Cameron looks set to break his [promise] by saying that £9,000 fees would be the exception,” Miliband said. “What’s more, this incompetence blows a hole in the claimed savings in the tuition fees policy.” Miliband said ministers claimed last year that cutting university budgets would save the taxpayer £2.9bn, despite it being apparent that the cost of subsidising higher fees would reduce savings by the end of the parliament to £1.3bn. With most fees now set to be between £8,000 and £9,000, the government would have to pay out even more in loans, he added. He said that if fees came in at the average currently being seen, the cost of loans could cost up to half a billion pounds more annually, reducing savings to well under £1bn. Miliband said some experts believed the system could cost more, not less, in the long run because of fears many loans may not be paid back. “Whatever the exact number, there will be a shortfall in the government’s figures,” he said. “The shortfall in the funding is a double jeopardy for young people. He said the policy was one of several measures “kicking away the ladder of opportunity for young people”. And he reiterated his interest in a graduate tax, an idea being explored by Labour as part of its policy review. Meanwhile, thousands of deprived teenagers are likely to shun university next year because they are misinformed about the government’s tuition fee reforms, a charity has warned. The Helena Kennedy Foundation, which offers bursaries and mentors to encourage the poorest teenagers to go from college to university, said many young people wrongly believed they would have to pay £9,000 fees out of their own pockets when they started their degrees. It warned that teenagers were also unaware that they could qualify for substantial bursaries and scholarships. Ministers must immediately launch a publicity campaign to address the public’s misunderstandings over tuition fees, the charity urged. Wes Streeting, chief executive of the charity, said it was “frankly extraordinary that the government has failed to launch an effective publicity campaign to ensure that potential applicants and their families are aware of the facts behind the new system, particularly that tuition fees will not be payable until after graduation”. “The chaos and confusion surrounding the implementation of the new system risk deterring students, especially those from non-traditional backgrounds.” English universities hoping to charge more than £6,000 a year have until the end of Tuesday to submit their plans to the government’s access watchdog, the Office for Fair Access (Offa) . At midday on Wednesday, the watchdog will publish how many universities have submitted their plans to charge more than £6,000. It will announce which universities’ plans it has approved by 11 July. Bristol University set out its plans on Tuesday to charge fees of between £3,500 and £9,000 a year from autumn 2012. It was one of one two universities in the Russell Group of large, research-intensive universities to not have made their proposals public. The London School of Economics and Political Science has not yet announced its fees. Ed Miliband Labour Education policy Tuition fees Higher education Students Hélène Mulholland Jessica Shepherd guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Labour leader says ‘unravelling’ fees policy could see places cut to make up funding shortfall At least 10% of university places for undergraduates will have to be cut to fund the coalition’s “unravelling” tuition fee reforms, the leader of the Labour party has warned. Ed Miliband said ministers would be forced to axe 36,000 full-time places each year. MPs voted in December to raise tuition fees from £3,350 a year to £6,000 in 2012, and up to £9,000 in “exceptional cases”. Willetts initially predicted that the average fee would be £7,500. He later revised that to £7,500-8,000. However, almost three-quarters of universities that have announced their tuition fee plans have opted to charge the maximum £9,000 for at least some of their degree courses from 2012. The average fee of those that have made their plans public currently stands at £8,679.20. This leaves the Treasury with a multi-million-pound blackhole. The initial cost of students’ fees is borne by the government, which pays the fee for each student in the form of a loan. The government then recovers its money once a student has graduated and is earning more than £21,000. Labour said one way for the government to claw back the higher upfront cost would be to cut student numbers. The party said House of Commons library figures showed that if average fees were £8,500 in 2014-15, the government would be short of £450m. To keep public spending constant, funds equivalent to 36,000 undergraduate full-time places would have to be lost, Labour said. Miliband told a press conference on Tuesday that the government’s tuition fee policy was “now unravelling”. “It will cost students more. It will now cost the taxpayer more. And it may cost thousands of young people their place at university,” he said. Figures from the House of Commons library published last month showed that if the average fee was £8,600, the government will have to spend £960m more in the next four years. If it is only slightly higher, at £7,900, it is £340m extra. But if the average is £8,900, the government will have to pay out an extra £1.23bn. Miliband made his comments prior to a visit to Leicester – following in the footsteps of Nick Clegg who, before the general election, made the “solemn promise” to oppose any increase in tuition fees during a visit to the city’s De Montfort University. He accused the government of a “second betrayal” and said David Cameron had broken a promise that £9,000 fees would be an exception. “Nick Clegg promised not to raise tuition fees, and now David Cameron looks set to break his [promise] by saying that £9,000 fees would be the exception,” Miliband said. “What’s more, this incompetence blows a hole in the claimed savings in the tuition fees policy.” Miliband said ministers claimed last year that cutting university budgets would save the taxpayer £2.9bn, despite it being apparent that the cost of subsidising higher fees would reduce savings by the end of the parliament to £1.3bn. With most fees now set to be between £8,000 and £9,000, the government would have to pay out even more in loans, he added. He said that if fees came in at the average currently being seen, the cost of loans could cost up to half a billion pounds more annually, reducing savings to well under £1bn. Miliband said some experts believed the system could cost more, not less, in the long run because of fears many loans may not be paid back. “Whatever the exact number, there will be a shortfall in the government’s figures,” he said. “The shortfall in the funding is a double jeopardy for young people. He said the policy was one of several measures “kicking away the ladder of opportunity for young people”. And he reiterated his interest in a graduate tax, an idea being explored by Labour as part of its policy review. Meanwhile, thousands of deprived teenagers are likely to shun university next year because they are misinformed about the government’s tuition fee reforms, a charity has warned. The Helena Kennedy Foundation, which offers bursaries and mentors to encourage the poorest teenagers to go from college to university, said many young people wrongly believed they would have to pay £9,000 fees out of their own pockets when they started their degrees. It warned that teenagers were also unaware that they could qualify for substantial bursaries and scholarships. Ministers must immediately launch a publicity campaign to address the public’s misunderstandings over tuition fees, the charity urged. Wes Streeting, chief executive of the charity, said it was “frankly extraordinary that the government has failed to launch an effective publicity campaign to ensure that potential applicants and their families are aware of the facts behind the new system, particularly that tuition fees will not be payable until after graduation”. “The chaos and confusion surrounding the implementation of the new system risk deterring students, especially those from non-traditional backgrounds.” English universities hoping to charge more than £6,000 a year have until the end of Tuesday to submit their plans to the government’s access watchdog, the Office for Fair Access (Offa) . At midday on Wednesday, the watchdog will publish how many universities have submitted their plans to charge more than £6,000. It will announce which universities’ plans it has approved by 11 July. Bristol University set out its plans on Tuesday to charge fees of between £3,500 and £9,000 a year from autumn 2012. It was one of one two universities in the Russell Group of large, research-intensive universities to not have made their proposals public. The London School of Economics and Political Science has not yet announced its fees. Ed Miliband Labour Education policy Tuition fees Higher education Students Hélène Mulholland Jessica Shepherd guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …• Met working with other forces to identify ‘black bloc’ anarchists • Muslims Against Crusades group refused permission to protest Police cannot rule out pre-emptive strikes against anarchists plotting to disrupt the royal wedding, Scotland Yard has said. In one of the biggest security operations in the history of the Metropolitan police, just under 5,000 police officers – including armed and undercover teams – will be on duty on 29 April in the city of Westminster and around the centre of London. So far, two groups have indicated that they wish to protest: Muslims against Crusades, who asked to demonstrate outside Westminster Abbey but were refused permission, and the English Defence League. The EDL indicated it would mount a demonstration if Muslims against Crusades did so. Sixty individuals who have been arrested at past demonstrations, such as the TUC anti-cuts protest and the student demonstration against the introduction of fees, have been banned from the city of Westminster as part of their bail conditions. Action will be taken against them if they enter the city on the day. In addition, the Met is working with forces across the country and is using “spotters” to identify those within the so-called “black bloc” of anarchists intent on causing trouble. Should evidence emerge that groups are planning to commit criminal acts, pre-emptive action will be taken, a Scotland Yard spokesman said. This could range from breaking up a squat where individuals are gathered, under breach of the peace legislation, or moving in to break up and arrest individuals if evidence suggests they are conspiring to commit criminal acts. “It is very difficult to build an intelligence picture, but we cannot rule out pre-emptive action,” said the spokesman. Assistant commissioner Lynne Owens, who is head of public order at Scotland Yard, said: “If anyone comes to London on the day of the royal wedding intending to commit criminal acts, we will act quickly, robustly and decisively so that it is a safe and happy environment for everyone else, who wishes to be here and celebrate.” The Met is also getting intelligence from the Fixated Threat Assessment Centre, a police unit set up in 2006 together with mental health agencies to identify individuals who are obsessed with members of the royal family, politicians or celebrities. Details of a handful of people are understood to have been passed on to police officers. Under the Serious Organised Crime Act 2005, the area around the houses of parliament and Westminster Abbey is designated an exclusion zone where unauthorised demonstrations are not allowed. An early conversation between Owens and Muslims against Crusades has been held. The refusal of permission to demonstrate outside the abbey does not prevent them from protesting elsewhere, but Owens warned that any action to burn the union flag would be seen as an offence under the Public Order Act. Royal wedding Metropolitan police Police Protest Monarchy Weddings Sandra Laville guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …• UK to send military advisory team to assist Libyan rebels • Syrian troops fire on protesters in Homs • Syrian security beat protesters at Damascus University Brian Whitaker will be conducting an online Q&A on Syria in the comments section at 2pm Click here to read the latest summary 1.44pm – Tripoli: The Guardian’s Harriet Sherwood, who is in Tripoli, has sent an update on a press conference given by the deputy foreign minister, Khaled Kayim, in which warns that any deployment of ground troops to protect humanitarian missions, as proposed by the EU, would be considered a “military mission”. “If there is any deployment of any armed personnel on Libyan ground, there will be fighting. The Libyan government will not take it as a humanitarian mission, it will be taken as a military mission,” he said. “[Nato] is acting beyond the security council resolution. They have their own objectives. If they keep acting like this, they are pushing the country to civil war and the Libyan people will not stay silent. They will join the armed forces and fight.” Kayim said the Libyan government was doing its utmost “to help people and supply them with food”. He repeatedly declined to answer questions about whether Libya would agree to a pause in military action to allow humanitarian aid to reach the besieged city of Misrata. “There is no need for such things,” he said. “There is no bombardment from the armed forces on Misrata, none at all. There are pockets of resistance but other areas are peaceful, There is no fighting in Misrata.” He claimed the international coalition was exaggerating the number of casualties in Misrata. “This is all shit.” Nato airstrikes had hit three telecommunications installations around the city of Sirte yesterday, he said. “The objective is to damage telecommunications networks, both landlines and mobiles. These raids come from requests from the rebels to enable them to advance west. “These developments come at the same time as the British government sends very sophisticated telecommunications equipment to the rebels to enable them to organise themselves.” 1.33pm: Here’s a summary of developments so far today: • The UK government is sending a “military liaison advisory team” to Libya to assist the opposition leadership in Benghazi . The UK foreign secretary, William Hague, insisted that its remit would be purely to advise the opposition council on how to protect civilians but it comes as his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov accused countries of violating the UN mandate by using it to try to topple Gaddafi • Shelling of Misrata has continued in Libya . Donatella Rovera, Amnesty International’s researcher in the city, said she saw casualties being brought into the hospital. • The Syrian government has warned protesters not to take to the streets after security forces opened fire on demonstrators in Homs overnight . More than 5,000 anti-government protesters had taken over the city’s main square vowing to remain there until the fall of President Assad’s government. Security forces reportedly fired shots and teargas at the demonstrators early this morning after asking them to leave. The government blamed militant Islamists (“Salafi armed groups”) for terrorising people. • Syrian security forces have reportedly used sticks against students protesting against the government at Damascus University’s faculty of medicine. Orient TV reported that 10 demonstrators were arrested and one student was injured. 1.21pm – Libya: The UK is sending a “military liaison advisory team” to Benghazi to assist the opposition council, foreign secretary William Hague has revealed in a statement. It could prompt accusations of “mission creep”, although the statement does emphasise the “humanitarian” nature of its role. The relevant part reads: The National Security Council has decided that we will now move quickly to expand the team already in Benghazi led by Christopher Prentice to include an additional military liaison advisory team. This contingent will be drawn from experienced British military officers. These additional personnel will enable the UK to build on the work already being undertaken to support and advise the NTC on how to better protect civilians. In particular they will advise the NTC on how to improve their military organisational structures, communications and logistics, including how best to distribute humanitarian aid and deliver medical assistance. In doing so, we will coordinate closely with other international partners also assisting the NTC. This deployment is fully within the terms of UNSCR 1973 both in respect of civilian protection and its provision expressly ruling out a foreign occupation force on Libyan soil. Consistent with our obligations under that resolution, our officers will not be involved in training or arming the opposition’s fighting forces. Nor will they be involved in the planning or execution of the NTC’s military operations or in the provision of any other form of operational military advice. Hague’s statement comes as Russia has warned that attempts to topple Gaddafi are a violation of the UN resolution on Libya, which only authorises the use of force to protect civilians. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said: The UN security council never aimed to topple the Libyan regime. All those who are currently using the UN resolution for that aim are violating the UN mandate. 12.51pm – Syria: More details are coming out about a protest at Damascus University’s faculty of medicine via the Syrian independent satellite channel, Orient. It was reported earlier on Twitter that security forces have used electrified batons against protesters. Orient is apparently reporting (link in Arabic) that 10 demonstrators have been arrested and one student has been injured. 12.31pm – Libya: The Washington Post’s Leila Fadel is one of the few journalists to report from inside Misrata. Fadel says the question for residents is how long they can survive as Gaddafi escalates his attacks and supplies become ever more scarce. Overhead, snipers eyed their targets while camped out in the insurance building — the tallest on the block — and in an adjacent bank. Rebels said the snipers are remarkably efficient, picking off their marks with shots to the head and chest. Rebels don’t bother to operate at night, because the snipers use night-vision goggles to target anything that moves. “We tried to blow up the buildings, but we don’t know how,” said Alaa el Deen Khesham, 30, a rebel fighter who until two months ago worked in public relations for the government. “We threw homemade bombs in there, but it didn’t do anything.” He looked down with sadness: “We wish Nato would bomb the buildings.” 12.15pm – Syria: It may be an exercise in futility, but the Syrian government is warning people not to take part in any protests. An interior ministry statement on Syrian TV says Syrian laws will be implemented to “safeguard the people’s security and the country’s stability”. Protesters seem to be paying scant regard to such appeals. 12.10pm – Yemen: The UN children’s fund says 26 children have been killed during protests in Yemen over the last two months. Unicef said most of the children died of wounds from live ammunition. 12.06pm – Syria: Brian Whitaker, one of the Guardian’s Middle East experts, will be on at 2pm GMT for a live web chat on the situation in Syria. Brian – who spent seven years as the Guardian’s Middle East editor – has reported widely from the region, and is the author of What’s Really Wrong with the Middle East. What kind of threat to the Assad regime does the current wave of protests represent? What are the dangers of sectarian violence in a country with many religious minorities? Are Assad’s modest offers of reform likely to be enough to satisfy the protesters? Post your questions in the comments below, and Brian will start posting his answers at 2pm. 12.01pm – Libya: Reuters has been in touch with Donatella Rovera ( 8.56am ), Amnesty’s researcher in Misrata, who says there has been renewed shelling today. “They were shelling very close by, in the area slightly to the northwest of the centre … I just left the hospital, there were casualties coming in,” she said by phone. “These are the areas which are, for now, in the hands of the opposition and they are being shelled by Gaddafi forces. The city centre is the front line.” “There is no electricity. The town is functioning on generators … the reserves of fuel are being used up. The supply of water has now been cut off for weeks, so again what is being used is reserves. They’ve gone back to using old wells.” 11.47am – Yemen: A Yemeni activist says four anti-government protesters were wounded after security forces opened fire on demonstrators in south Yemen. Nouh al-Wafi told AP that several thousand protesters in the city of Taiz were demanding the resignation of President Ali Abdullah Saleh when security forces fired on the crowd. 11.45am – Syria: @ZainSyr is tweeting, in Arabic, that security forces are using electrified batons to try to break up a demonstration at Damascus University’s medicine faculty. 11.41am – Syria: Clock Square in Homs is empty now, Katharine says, except for security preventing people from coming back. 11.37am – Syria: Katherine Marsh – our correspondent in Damascus – says some people in the capital are worried by government reports that Salafists were involved, Salafism being a strict form of Sunni Islam which is often equated with militant Islamist groups. This is unlikely to deter protesters, but could affect some of the undecided majority. Many reports on Homs describe it as a “conservative” city. The tag, which was also applied to Deraa and Douma, is not particularly instructive. A lot of Syrian society is conservative. Homs also has a reputation for being full of liberal artists, journalists and intellectuals who oppose the regime. On past visits I have found it to be a lively city with a diverse mix of people. It is worth looking at cities and try to see what particular factors may be at work, but to try and detach Homs from growing restiveness across the country would be misleading. There have been protests in enough places now. 11.21am – Libya: Benjamin Barber, the US academic who resigned from Saif al-Islam Gaddafi’s foundation at the outset of the insurgency, has just been talking at the Guardian’s morning news conference about Libya and particularly Saif. Barber’s main point is that it would be too easy to dismiss Saif’s reformist credentials. Even though Saif has put blood over principle, Barber argues, Saif along with Abdullah al-Senussi, the national security chief (who is also Muammar Gaddafi’s brother-in-law), remain the regime’s only credible interlocutors. So if the west wants a negotiated settlement and avoid a prolonged civil war that could end up benefiting Islamist extremists, it will have to talk to these two. “You need to talk to someone and Saif and Senussi” are the most viable, Barber said. For a fuller exposition of his position, read Barber’s piece for Comment is Free last week. 10.56am – Syria: The Guardian has compiled amateur video footage of recent demonstrations in Syria : _ 10.53am – Syria: An eyewitness to events in Homs told AP by telephone: They shot at everything, there was smoke everywhere. I saw people on the ground, some shot in their feet, some in the stomach. Another resident said: They went up to people’s homes, they arrested many,” a Homs resident said by telephone. “We heard ambulances all night. AP writes: The Egypt-style standoff in Homs followed funeral processions by more than 10,000 mourners for some of those killed in clashes Sunday that a rights group said left at least 12 people dead. The protesters, mostly young men but including women and children, had set up tents, bringing in mattresses, food and drinks. One tent was named “national unity tent.” Another “martyrs” tent was set up to offer condolences for those killed a day earlier, according to an eyewitness. 9.52am – Syria: It’s unclear if pro-democracy activists are still occupying the square in the Syrian city of Homs where shooting broke out last night, but according to Katherine Marsh – our correspondent in Damascus – events in the city are a sign that the country’s protest movement is gaining momentum. Homs is Syria’s third largest city. In the absence of major protests in Aleppo and Damascus, getting a foothold here would be significant for the pro-democracy movement, which is rapidly gathering steam but has yet to reach a tipping point. Activists have drawn inspiration from their counterparts in Egypt, where Tahrir square became a focus for weeks of protest which eventually brought down Hosni Mubarak. Occupying Clock Square could be a major step forward for them. The size of last night’s protest is also significant: some reports said as many as 10,000 protestors congregated on the square. There have been a few larger protests in the cities of Deraa and Douma, but most demonstrations have been much smaller. Katherine also says the government’s reaction, which was to blame the unrest on outsiders and militant Islamists is becoming ever more untenable: In a tweet this morning Chatham House’s Syria expert Rime Allaf said: “How many ‘armed insurrections’ have you seen just sit in the middle of a square & wait to be gunned down?” Syria’s government has often invoked the threat of Islamism to justify its hardline policy on internal dissent. Syrian society includes large minorities of Christians and Druze, and the fear of sectarian violence is often cited as an argument against too much political freedom.s Conservative Sunni groups have represented the biggest challenge to the Baath regime since it came to power in 1963, prompting a crackdown by the government throughout the 1970s and 1980s. There are also fears of a repeat of 1982, when an uprising by the Muslim Brotherhood was brutally suppressed, with up to 10,000 people massacred in Hama, close to Homs: Such a reaction may be less likely in an age of Twitter and YouTube, but last night’s use of violence has heightened fears among protesters, said Mohammed Essa, an activist in Homs. ‘We want a social and political solution to this,’ said Essa. ‘It is getting nasty.’” 9.39am – Syria: A Syrian activist explains what is driving the anti-government protests, on the Institute for War and Peace reporting website . What people really want at this stage is a promise of genuine reform on the part of the government. We want the actual lifting of the state of emergency, not the establishment of committees to talk about removing it. We want to see the removal of the clause in the constitution which maintains the dominance of the Baath party and negates any possibility of plurality in Syrian society. Ordinary Syrians have been living with this feeling of humiliation for decades: without basic rights and no financial benefit from the corrupt domestic situation. I would love to live in a Syria where everyone enjoyed the same civil liberties and employment opportunities, but unfortunately I am not very optimistic at this stage. Of course, Assad will try to implement some of the same reforms seen in Egypt to prevent mass outrage, and now he is furiously trying to win the loyalty of the Kurds and religious groups by making concessions to them. But, in my view, you cannot fix a fundamentally dysfunctional regime. We need to build democracy step by step, even if it means risking more instability and violence in the near future. We are never going to mature politically unless we go through this. What I and other activists are doing is of course very dangerous, but we all have to risk ourselves for Syria. The moment is here now, and who knows when we might get it again. 9.19am – Libya: Reuters has an interesting analysis of the balance of forces in Misrata . While pro-Gaddafi forces have the advantage in weapons, the insurgents have local knowledge and the urban terrain favours them. The key rebel advantage, analysts tell Reuters, is the port and the lifeline it provides. “Control of the port is essential because without that they would be truly cut off, they would fold, they would not be able to withstand the siege,” Shashank Joshi, analyst at Britain’s Royal United Service Institute, said… Footage of rag-tag rebels with rocket-propelled grenades and automatic rifles crouching among crumbling buildings and launching hit-and-run attacks evoke images of other city sieges – such as the Serb encirclement of Sarajevo in the early 1990s. But analysts say they have a much-needed edge in fighting in built-up areas on their home turf. They know the terrain better than their adversaries, who may also experience difficulties in using their heavy weaponry to maximum effect. “Even the most efficient and professional troops in the world – like the Americans, the British, who have been in Iraq for example – have found that in urban fighting the advantage is always on the defender,” said military analyst Paul Beaver. Insurgents can use their local knowledge to spring ambushes, and the only way to seize Misrata would be to start levelling it, as the Soviets did in Berlin at the end of World War Two. 9.02am – Syria: A Syrian activist and blogger based in New York, Ammar Abdulhamid, writes about the protests in Homs . His blog carries several videos of demonstrations in Homs and elsewhere. The sit-in lasted the entire day and well through the night, but as the day unfolded numbers grew to around 6,000 protesters around 2am on Tuesday. Shortly after, eyewitnesses reported the beginning of a crackdown by security forces. Early reports spoke of heavy gunfire but mentioned only one fatality and a number of injured. Videos that were posted later seem to confirm these reports. Assad security officers might have been shooting in the air to scare off the remaining protesters, rather than at them, for once. However, later reports indicate that the main theatre of events are the side-streets where security officers tried to trap and arrest protesters as they pulled out from the square, occasionally firing straight at them, as some eyewitnesses asserted. 8.56am – Libya: Donatella Rovera, a researcher for Amnesty International, is keeping an account of what she has seen in Misrata. it provides an invaluable insight into what is going on there with few journalists being able to gain access. Here is part of her blog. Here in Misrata, Libya’s third city, we have just experienced four more days of relentless shelling by Colonel al-Gaddafi’s forces. In just two of the residential neighbourhoods I have been able to visit in the past four days – Qasr Ahmad in the east of the city and Zawia al-Mahjoub in the west – hundreds of rockets and mortar shells have rained down, literally all over the place. I have lost count of how many homes I’ve seen that have been hit in these clearly indiscriminate attacks. Medical clinics, schools, mosques, factories and the port – where thousands of foreign workers are stranded and waiting to be rescued – are just some of the locations that have come under attack. Fortunately, many of the residents of the houses that took direct hits escaped injury but others were not so lucky. Adults and children alike have been killed and injured in their homes and on the streets by flying shrapnel from these projectiles. In the centre of town, where the “frontline” between Colonel al-Gaddafi’s forces and opposition fighters keeps shifting from street to street, the devastation is extensive. In this area I found cluster bombs all over the place – they present an enormous danger, not least because these munitions have a high “dud” rate, meaning that unexploded bombs litter the area. 8.47am – Syria: No independent media are allowed in Homs or other cities to report on the anti-government demonstrations and several international journalists have been expelled or arrested, but this YouTube video gives an idea of the size of the protests in Homs. _ 8.30am – Syria: The Syrian government is under renewed pressure as clashes break out between security forces and protesters in Homs, Syria’s third largest city. The Associated Press said more than 5,000 anti-government protesters took over the main square overnight. Reuters says security forces fired shots and tear gas at the demonstrators early this morning after asking them to leave. Here’s part of the Reuters account. A member of the security police addressed the protesters at Clock Square through a loud speaker asking them to leave, and then the forces opened fire, said the human rights campaigner, who is in contact with protesters in the square. Tear gas was also used. At least one protester was injured, the activist added. Two residents of Homs also said they heard the sound of gunfire coming from around the square. Several hours earlier, Syrian state television broadcast an interior ministry statement that described the wave of unrest in Syria as an insurrection, pointing specifically to Homs as one of two cities where “armed groups belonging to Salafist organisations” were trying to terrorise the population. Salafism is a strict form of Sunni Islam which many Arab governments equate with militant groups like al-Qaida. Thousands demanded the overthrow of President Bashar al-Assad on Monday at the funerals of 17 protesters killed in Homs, 100 miles north of Damascus. Human rights campaigners said the 17 had been killed late on Sunday during protests against the death in custody of a tribal leader in Homs. There is YouTube video purporting to show the clashes in Homs. You don’t see the security forces but the sound of gunfire is loud and clear. _ 8.00am: • Forces loyal to Muammar Gaddafi could retake Misrata within days unless Nato steps up its military intervention to assist the besieged rebels, according to an opposition spokesman inside the city . Rebels say there have been no Nato air strikes on government positions for three days. • The United Nations has signed an agreement with Libya for a “humanitarian presence” in the country but it is still unclear how this will help Misrata, the focus of mounting international concern . Officials in New York made clear that the EU – which has drawn up plans to deploy military forces on the ground in Libya to assist the humanitarian effort – would only be asked to help “as a last resort”. Nato repeated that it would not get directly involved in supplying aid. • A chartered ship evacuated nearly 1,000 foreign workers and wounded Libyans from Misrata, the second evacuation ship in the past few days . An estimated 4,000 refugees await rescue. • Security forces fired shots and tear gas at hundreds of protesters who had gathered overnight in the main square in Homs, Syria’s third largest city . Human rights campaigners say the demonstrators were asked to leave by the security police, which then opened fire. At least one protester was reported injured. Libya Syria Arab and Middle East unrest Bahrain Yemen Mark Tran Haroon Siddique guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …