Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 1255)
Palestinian PM must go, Hamas says

Islamist faction makes demand as part of Palestine unity pact with Fatah, set to be signed in Cairo next week Hamas has insisted on the departure of Salam Fayyad, the Palestinian prime minister favoured by Israel and the west, under a deal agreed with its rival faction Fatah for a unity government, according to sources in Gaza. The Islamist organisation also said it would keep control of the Gaza Strip under the accord, which is expected to be formally signed by leaders of the two factions in Cairo next week. The plan drew further criticism on Thursday from Israel, which has said it would not deal with a Palestinian government that included members of Hamas. However, the interim Hamas-Fatah government will have no involvement in negotiations with Israel. Talks will still be conducted by the Palestinian Liberation Organisation, headed by Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas. Abbas said a caretaker government would feature technocrats and exclude Hamas members. “The people will be independents, technocrats, not affiliated with any factions,” he said. He said it was “too early to tell” whether Fayyad, an independent and non-elected prime minister, would continue in post. Under the reconciliation deal, presidential and legislative elections will be held next year. Egypt said it would send a security team to Gaza. “An Egyptian security delegation will head to Gaza to help settle and organise the internal security situation there, now that the reconciliation agreement is finally in place,” an Egyptian security source told Reuters. Egyptian negotiators, who brokered the deal in a series of secret meetings, persuaded Hamas to accept a non-political cabinet, which will not deter foreign donors, and convinced Fatah to allow Hamas to maintain its security control of Gaza, sources told the Guardian. But Hamas insisted on the removal of Fayyad as prime minister. Although his stewardship of the Palestinian Authority and success in reforming its institutions has been praised by the international community, Fayyad is seen as anti-Hamas and his continued premiership would seem like a defeat for the Islamist faction. Abbas will appoint the new prime minister. The most popular candidate is Munib al Masri, a US-educated businessman respected by both factions. Meanwhile, Israeli leaders continued to criticise the agreement. President Shimon Peres called it a “fatal mistake that will prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state and will sabotage chances of peace and stability in the region … the world cannot support the establishment of a state that part of its regime is a terror organisation”. Israel’s hardline foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman, told the Army Radio station: “Hundreds of terrorists will flood the West Bank and therefore we need to prepare for a different situation.” The opposition leader, Tzipi Livni, urged the international community to put pressure on the Palestinians to ensure the new government renounced violence and recognised Israel’s right to exist. The two factions were persuaded by “friends in the Arab World and the European Union that it was time to finish the split”, said Faisal Abu Shahla, a Fatah legislator in the Gaza Strip. But some expressed scepticism about the extent of reconciliation. Mkhaimar Abusada, a professor of political science at al-Azhar University in Gaza, described the agreement as “a very vague format which will allow Palestinians to speak with one voice but, at a practical level, there will remain two separate entities in the West Bank and Gaza in terms of security. “Hamas will be able to maintain its militias and its rhetoric of resistance to Israel. There will not be many changes on the ground. Each one will be in charge of their territory,” he said. Hamas officials indicated that the organisation understood the unity agreement could be jeopardised by any militant operations. “We have to be careful of how we respond to Israel because they will do everything to dismantle the agreement,” said Ghazi Hamed, Hamas’s deputy foreign minister. “It is clear that Israel does not like us. They want to divide us because it gives them more power. I expect they will try to provoke us and create chaos to put pressure on Mahmoud Abbas. All sides admit that the agreement is the first step of a complicated process. Hamed said: ” The challenge will be to implement the agreement. If we succeed in choosing a strong PM and a strong minister of interior, we stand a better chance of success.” Abu Shahla said one consequence of the agreement would be that Fatah would be able to operate openly in Gaza for the first time since 2007 and Hamas would be able to do the same in the West Bank. Following the signing of the deal, Abbas may make his first visit to Gaza in more than four years. Palestinian territories Middle East Israel Hamas Fatah Gaza Conal Urquhart guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Palestinian PM must go, Hamas says

Islamist faction makes demand as part of Palestine unity pact with Fatah, set to be signed in Cairo next week Hamas has insisted on the departure of Salam Fayyad, the Palestinian prime minister favoured by Israel and the west, under a deal agreed with its rival faction Fatah for a unity government, according to sources in Gaza. The Islamist organisation also said it would keep control of the Gaza Strip under the accord, which is expected to be formally signed by leaders of the two factions in Cairo next week. The plan drew further criticism on Thursday from Israel, which has said it would not deal with a Palestinian government that included members of Hamas. However, the interim Hamas-Fatah government will have no involvement in negotiations with Israel. Talks will still be conducted by the Palestinian Liberation Organisation, headed by Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas. Abbas said a caretaker government would feature technocrats and exclude Hamas members. “The people will be independents, technocrats, not affiliated with any factions,” he said. He said it was “too early to tell” whether Fayyad, an independent and non-elected prime minister, would continue in post. Under the reconciliation deal, presidential and legislative elections will be held next year. Egypt said it would send a security team to Gaza. “An Egyptian security delegation will head to Gaza to help settle and organise the internal security situation there, now that the reconciliation agreement is finally in place,” an Egyptian security source told Reuters. Egyptian negotiators, who brokered the deal in a series of secret meetings, persuaded Hamas to accept a non-political cabinet, which will not deter foreign donors, and convinced Fatah to allow Hamas to maintain its security control of Gaza, sources told the Guardian. But Hamas insisted on the removal of Fayyad as prime minister. Although his stewardship of the Palestinian Authority and success in reforming its institutions has been praised by the international community, Fayyad is seen as anti-Hamas and his continued premiership would seem like a defeat for the Islamist faction. Abbas will appoint the new prime minister. The most popular candidate is Munib al Masri, a US-educated businessman respected by both factions. Meanwhile, Israeli leaders continued to criticise the agreement. President Shimon Peres called it a “fatal mistake that will prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state and will sabotage chances of peace and stability in the region … the world cannot support the establishment of a state that part of its regime is a terror organisation”. Israel’s hardline foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman, told the Army Radio station: “Hundreds of terrorists will flood the West Bank and therefore we need to prepare for a different situation.” The opposition leader, Tzipi Livni, urged the international community to put pressure on the Palestinians to ensure the new government renounced violence and recognised Israel’s right to exist. The two factions were persuaded by “friends in the Arab World and the European Union that it was time to finish the split”, said Faisal Abu Shahla, a Fatah legislator in the Gaza Strip. But some expressed scepticism about the extent of reconciliation. Mkhaimar Abusada, a professor of political science at al-Azhar University in Gaza, described the agreement as “a very vague format which will allow Palestinians to speak with one voice but, at a practical level, there will remain two separate entities in the West Bank and Gaza in terms of security. “Hamas will be able to maintain its militias and its rhetoric of resistance to Israel. There will not be many changes on the ground. Each one will be in charge of their territory,” he said. Hamas officials indicated that the organisation understood the unity agreement could be jeopardised by any militant operations. “We have to be careful of how we respond to Israel because they will do everything to dismantle the agreement,” said Ghazi Hamed, Hamas’s deputy foreign minister. “It is clear that Israel does not like us. They want to divide us because it gives them more power. I expect they will try to provoke us and create chaos to put pressure on Mahmoud Abbas. All sides admit that the agreement is the first step of a complicated process. Hamed said: ” The challenge will be to implement the agreement. If we succeed in choosing a strong PM and a strong minister of interior, we stand a better chance of success.” Abu Shahla said one consequence of the agreement would be that Fatah would be able to operate openly in Gaza for the first time since 2007 and Hamas would be able to do the same in the West Bank. Following the signing of the deal, Abbas may make his first visit to Gaza in more than four years. Palestinian territories Middle East Israel Hamas Fatah Gaza Conal Urquhart guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Palestinian PM must go, Hamas says

Islamist faction makes demand as part of Palestine unity pact with Fatah, set to be signed in Cairo next week Hamas has insisted on the departure of Salam Fayyad, the Palestinian prime minister favoured by Israel and the west, under a deal agreed with its rival faction Fatah for a unity government, according to sources in Gaza. The Islamist organisation also said it would keep control of the Gaza Strip under the accord, which is expected to be formally signed by leaders of the two factions in Cairo next week. The plan drew further criticism on Thursday from Israel, which has said it would not deal with a Palestinian government that included members of Hamas. However, the interim Hamas-Fatah government will have no involvement in negotiations with Israel. Talks will still be conducted by the Palestinian Liberation Organisation, headed by Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas. Abbas said a caretaker government would feature technocrats and exclude Hamas members. “The people will be independents, technocrats, not affiliated with any factions,” he said. He said it was “too early to tell” whether Fayyad, an independent and non-elected prime minister, would continue in post. Under the reconciliation deal, presidential and legislative elections will be held next year. Egypt said it would send a security team to Gaza. “An Egyptian security delegation will head to Gaza to help settle and organise the internal security situation there, now that the reconciliation agreement is finally in place,” an Egyptian security source told Reuters. Egyptian negotiators, who brokered the deal in a series of secret meetings, persuaded Hamas to accept a non-political cabinet, which will not deter foreign donors, and convinced Fatah to allow Hamas to maintain its security control of Gaza, sources told the Guardian. But Hamas insisted on the removal of Fayyad as prime minister. Although his stewardship of the Palestinian Authority and success in reforming its institutions has been praised by the international community, Fayyad is seen as anti-Hamas and his continued premiership would seem like a defeat for the Islamist faction. Abbas will appoint the new prime minister. The most popular candidate is Munib al Masri, a US-educated businessman respected by both factions. Meanwhile, Israeli leaders continued to criticise the agreement. President Shimon Peres called it a “fatal mistake that will prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state and will sabotage chances of peace and stability in the region … the world cannot support the establishment of a state that part of its regime is a terror organisation”. Israel’s hardline foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman, told the Army Radio station: “Hundreds of terrorists will flood the West Bank and therefore we need to prepare for a different situation.” The opposition leader, Tzipi Livni, urged the international community to put pressure on the Palestinians to ensure the new government renounced violence and recognised Israel’s right to exist. The two factions were persuaded by “friends in the Arab World and the European Union that it was time to finish the split”, said Faisal Abu Shahla, a Fatah legislator in the Gaza Strip. But some expressed scepticism about the extent of reconciliation. Mkhaimar Abusada, a professor of political science at al-Azhar University in Gaza, described the agreement as “a very vague format which will allow Palestinians to speak with one voice but, at a practical level, there will remain two separate entities in the West Bank and Gaza in terms of security. “Hamas will be able to maintain its militias and its rhetoric of resistance to Israel. There will not be many changes on the ground. Each one will be in charge of their territory,” he said. Hamas officials indicated that the organisation understood the unity agreement could be jeopardised by any militant operations. “We have to be careful of how we respond to Israel because they will do everything to dismantle the agreement,” said Ghazi Hamed, Hamas’s deputy foreign minister. “It is clear that Israel does not like us. They want to divide us because it gives them more power. I expect they will try to provoke us and create chaos to put pressure on Mahmoud Abbas. All sides admit that the agreement is the first step of a complicated process. Hamed said: ” The challenge will be to implement the agreement. If we succeed in choosing a strong PM and a strong minister of interior, we stand a better chance of success.” Abu Shahla said one consequence of the agreement would be that Fatah would be able to operate openly in Gaza for the first time since 2007 and Hamas would be able to do the same in the West Bank. Following the signing of the deal, Abbas may make his first visit to Gaza in more than four years. Palestinian territories Middle East Israel Hamas Fatah Gaza Conal Urquhart guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Palestinian PM must go, Hamas says

Islamist faction makes demand as part of Palestine unity pact with Fatah, set to be signed in Cairo next week Hamas has insisted on the departure of Salam Fayyad, the Palestinian prime minister favoured by Israel and the west, under a deal agreed with its rival faction Fatah for a unity government, according to sources in Gaza. The Islamist organisation also said it would keep control of the Gaza Strip under the accord, which is expected to be formally signed by leaders of the two factions in Cairo next week. The plan drew further criticism on Thursday from Israel, which has said it would not deal with a Palestinian government that included members of Hamas. However, the interim Hamas-Fatah government will have no involvement in negotiations with Israel. Talks will still be conducted by the Palestinian Liberation Organisation, headed by Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas. Abbas said a caretaker government would feature technocrats and exclude Hamas members. “The people will be independents, technocrats, not affiliated with any factions,” he said. He said it was “too early to tell” whether Fayyad, an independent and non-elected prime minister, would continue in post. Under the reconciliation deal, presidential and legislative elections will be held next year. Egypt said it would send a security team to Gaza. “An Egyptian security delegation will head to Gaza to help settle and organise the internal security situation there, now that the reconciliation agreement is finally in place,” an Egyptian security source told Reuters. Egyptian negotiators, who brokered the deal in a series of secret meetings, persuaded Hamas to accept a non-political cabinet, which will not deter foreign donors, and convinced Fatah to allow Hamas to maintain its security control of Gaza, sources told the Guardian. But Hamas insisted on the removal of Fayyad as prime minister. Although his stewardship of the Palestinian Authority and success in reforming its institutions has been praised by the international community, Fayyad is seen as anti-Hamas and his continued premiership would seem like a defeat for the Islamist faction. Abbas will appoint the new prime minister. The most popular candidate is Munib al Masri, a US-educated businessman respected by both factions. Meanwhile, Israeli leaders continued to criticise the agreement. President Shimon Peres called it a “fatal mistake that will prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state and will sabotage chances of peace and stability in the region … the world cannot support the establishment of a state that part of its regime is a terror organisation”. Israel’s hardline foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman, told the Army Radio station: “Hundreds of terrorists will flood the West Bank and therefore we need to prepare for a different situation.” The opposition leader, Tzipi Livni, urged the international community to put pressure on the Palestinians to ensure the new government renounced violence and recognised Israel’s right to exist. The two factions were persuaded by “friends in the Arab World and the European Union that it was time to finish the split”, said Faisal Abu Shahla, a Fatah legislator in the Gaza Strip. But some expressed scepticism about the extent of reconciliation. Mkhaimar Abusada, a professor of political science at al-Azhar University in Gaza, described the agreement as “a very vague format which will allow Palestinians to speak with one voice but, at a practical level, there will remain two separate entities in the West Bank and Gaza in terms of security. “Hamas will be able to maintain its militias and its rhetoric of resistance to Israel. There will not be many changes on the ground. Each one will be in charge of their territory,” he said. Hamas officials indicated that the organisation understood the unity agreement could be jeopardised by any militant operations. “We have to be careful of how we respond to Israel because they will do everything to dismantle the agreement,” said Ghazi Hamed, Hamas’s deputy foreign minister. “It is clear that Israel does not like us. They want to divide us because it gives them more power. I expect they will try to provoke us and create chaos to put pressure on Mahmoud Abbas. All sides admit that the agreement is the first step of a complicated process. Hamed said: ” The challenge will be to implement the agreement. If we succeed in choosing a strong PM and a strong minister of interior, we stand a better chance of success.” Abu Shahla said one consequence of the agreement would be that Fatah would be able to operate openly in Gaza for the first time since 2007 and Hamas would be able to do the same in the West Bank. Following the signing of the deal, Abbas may make his first visit to Gaza in more than four years. Palestinian territories Middle East Israel Hamas Fatah Gaza Conal Urquhart guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Palestinian PM must go, Hamas says

Islamist faction makes demand as part of Palestine unity pact with Fatah, set to be signed in Cairo next week Hamas has insisted on the departure of Salam Fayyad, the Palestinian prime minister favoured by Israel and the west, under a deal agreed with its rival faction Fatah for a unity government, according to sources in Gaza. The Islamist organisation also said it would keep control of the Gaza Strip under the accord, which is expected to be formally signed by leaders of the two factions in Cairo next week. The plan drew further criticism on Thursday from Israel, which has said it would not deal with a Palestinian government that included members of Hamas. However, the interim Hamas-Fatah government will have no involvement in negotiations with Israel. Talks will still be conducted by the Palestinian Liberation Organisation, headed by Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas. Abbas said a caretaker government would feature technocrats and exclude Hamas members. “The people will be independents, technocrats, not affiliated with any factions,” he said. He said it was “too early to tell” whether Fayyad, an independent and non-elected prime minister, would continue in post. Under the reconciliation deal, presidential and legislative elections will be held next year. Egypt said it would send a security team to Gaza. “An Egyptian security delegation will head to Gaza to help settle and organise the internal security situation there, now that the reconciliation agreement is finally in place,” an Egyptian security source told Reuters. Egyptian negotiators, who brokered the deal in a series of secret meetings, persuaded Hamas to accept a non-political cabinet, which will not deter foreign donors, and convinced Fatah to allow Hamas to maintain its security control of Gaza, sources told the Guardian. But Hamas insisted on the removal of Fayyad as prime minister. Although his stewardship of the Palestinian Authority and success in reforming its institutions has been praised by the international community, Fayyad is seen as anti-Hamas and his continued premiership would seem like a defeat for the Islamist faction. Abbas will appoint the new prime minister. The most popular candidate is Munib al Masri, a US-educated businessman respected by both factions. Meanwhile, Israeli leaders continued to criticise the agreement. President Shimon Peres called it a “fatal mistake that will prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state and will sabotage chances of peace and stability in the region … the world cannot support the establishment of a state that part of its regime is a terror organisation”. Israel’s hardline foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman, told the Army Radio station: “Hundreds of terrorists will flood the West Bank and therefore we need to prepare for a different situation.” The opposition leader, Tzipi Livni, urged the international community to put pressure on the Palestinians to ensure the new government renounced violence and recognised Israel’s right to exist. The two factions were persuaded by “friends in the Arab World and the European Union that it was time to finish the split”, said Faisal Abu Shahla, a Fatah legislator in the Gaza Strip. But some expressed scepticism about the extent of reconciliation. Mkhaimar Abusada, a professor of political science at al-Azhar University in Gaza, described the agreement as “a very vague format which will allow Palestinians to speak with one voice but, at a practical level, there will remain two separate entities in the West Bank and Gaza in terms of security. “Hamas will be able to maintain its militias and its rhetoric of resistance to Israel. There will not be many changes on the ground. Each one will be in charge of their territory,” he said. Hamas officials indicated that the organisation understood the unity agreement could be jeopardised by any militant operations. “We have to be careful of how we respond to Israel because they will do everything to dismantle the agreement,” said Ghazi Hamed, Hamas’s deputy foreign minister. “It is clear that Israel does not like us. They want to divide us because it gives them more power. I expect they will try to provoke us and create chaos to put pressure on Mahmoud Abbas. All sides admit that the agreement is the first step of a complicated process. Hamed said: ” The challenge will be to implement the agreement. If we succeed in choosing a strong PM and a strong minister of interior, we stand a better chance of success.” Abu Shahla said one consequence of the agreement would be that Fatah would be able to operate openly in Gaza for the first time since 2007 and Hamas would be able to do the same in the West Bank. Following the signing of the deal, Abbas may make his first visit to Gaza in more than four years. Palestinian territories Middle East Israel Hamas Fatah Gaza Conal Urquhart guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Palestinian PM must go, Hamas says

Islamist faction makes demand as part of Palestine unity pact with Fatah, set to be signed in Cairo next week Hamas has insisted on the departure of Salam Fayyad, the Palestinian prime minister favoured by Israel and the west, under a deal agreed with its rival faction Fatah for a unity government, according to sources in Gaza. The Islamist organisation also said it would keep control of the Gaza Strip under the accord, which is expected to be formally signed by leaders of the two factions in Cairo next week. The plan drew further criticism on Thursday from Israel, which has said it would not deal with a Palestinian government that included members of Hamas. However, the interim Hamas-Fatah government will have no involvement in negotiations with Israel. Talks will still be conducted by the Palestinian Liberation Organisation, headed by Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas. Abbas said a caretaker government would feature technocrats and exclude Hamas members. “The people will be independents, technocrats, not affiliated with any factions,” he said. He said it was “too early to tell” whether Fayyad, an independent and non-elected prime minister, would continue in post. Under the reconciliation deal, presidential and legislative elections will be held next year. Egypt said it would send a security team to Gaza. “An Egyptian security delegation will head to Gaza to help settle and organise the internal security situation there, now that the reconciliation agreement is finally in place,” an Egyptian security source told Reuters. Egyptian negotiators, who brokered the deal in a series of secret meetings, persuaded Hamas to accept a non-political cabinet, which will not deter foreign donors, and convinced Fatah to allow Hamas to maintain its security control of Gaza, sources told the Guardian. But Hamas insisted on the removal of Fayyad as prime minister. Although his stewardship of the Palestinian Authority and success in reforming its institutions has been praised by the international community, Fayyad is seen as anti-Hamas and his continued premiership would seem like a defeat for the Islamist faction. Abbas will appoint the new prime minister. The most popular candidate is Munib al Masri, a US-educated businessman respected by both factions. Meanwhile, Israeli leaders continued to criticise the agreement. President Shimon Peres called it a “fatal mistake that will prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state and will sabotage chances of peace and stability in the region … the world cannot support the establishment of a state that part of its regime is a terror organisation”. Israel’s hardline foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman, told the Army Radio station: “Hundreds of terrorists will flood the West Bank and therefore we need to prepare for a different situation.” The opposition leader, Tzipi Livni, urged the international community to put pressure on the Palestinians to ensure the new government renounced violence and recognised Israel’s right to exist. The two factions were persuaded by “friends in the Arab World and the European Union that it was time to finish the split”, said Faisal Abu Shahla, a Fatah legislator in the Gaza Strip. But some expressed scepticism about the extent of reconciliation. Mkhaimar Abusada, a professor of political science at al-Azhar University in Gaza, described the agreement as “a very vague format which will allow Palestinians to speak with one voice but, at a practical level, there will remain two separate entities in the West Bank and Gaza in terms of security. “Hamas will be able to maintain its militias and its rhetoric of resistance to Israel. There will not be many changes on the ground. Each one will be in charge of their territory,” he said. Hamas officials indicated that the organisation understood the unity agreement could be jeopardised by any militant operations. “We have to be careful of how we respond to Israel because they will do everything to dismantle the agreement,” said Ghazi Hamed, Hamas’s deputy foreign minister. “It is clear that Israel does not like us. They want to divide us because it gives them more power. I expect they will try to provoke us and create chaos to put pressure on Mahmoud Abbas. All sides admit that the agreement is the first step of a complicated process. Hamed said: ” The challenge will be to implement the agreement. If we succeed in choosing a strong PM and a strong minister of interior, we stand a better chance of success.” Abu Shahla said one consequence of the agreement would be that Fatah would be able to operate openly in Gaza for the first time since 2007 and Hamas would be able to do the same in the West Bank. Following the signing of the deal, Abbas may make his first visit to Gaza in more than four years. Palestinian territories Middle East Israel Hamas Fatah Gaza Conal Urquhart guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Palestinian PM must go, Hamas says

Islamist faction makes demand as part of Palestine unity pact with Fatah, set to be signed in Cairo next week Hamas has insisted on the departure of Salam Fayyad, the Palestinian prime minister favoured by Israel and the west, under a deal agreed with its rival faction Fatah for a unity government, according to sources in Gaza. The Islamist organisation also said it would keep control of the Gaza Strip under the accord, which is expected to be formally signed by leaders of the two factions in Cairo next week. The plan drew further criticism on Thursday from Israel, which has said it would not deal with a Palestinian government that included members of Hamas. However, the interim Hamas-Fatah government will have no involvement in negotiations with Israel. Talks will still be conducted by the Palestinian Liberation Organisation, headed by Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas. Abbas said a caretaker government would feature technocrats and exclude Hamas members. “The people will be independents, technocrats, not affiliated with any factions,” he said. He said it was “too early to tell” whether Fayyad, an independent and non-elected prime minister, would continue in post. Under the reconciliation deal, presidential and legislative elections will be held next year. Egypt said it would send a security team to Gaza. “An Egyptian security delegation will head to Gaza to help settle and organise the internal security situation there, now that the reconciliation agreement is finally in place,” an Egyptian security source told Reuters. Egyptian negotiators, who brokered the deal in a series of secret meetings, persuaded Hamas to accept a non-political cabinet, which will not deter foreign donors, and convinced Fatah to allow Hamas to maintain its security control of Gaza, sources told the Guardian. But Hamas insisted on the removal of Fayyad as prime minister. Although his stewardship of the Palestinian Authority and success in reforming its institutions has been praised by the international community, Fayyad is seen as anti-Hamas and his continued premiership would seem like a defeat for the Islamist faction. Abbas will appoint the new prime minister. The most popular candidate is Munib al Masri, a US-educated businessman respected by both factions. Meanwhile, Israeli leaders continued to criticise the agreement. President Shimon Peres called it a “fatal mistake that will prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state and will sabotage chances of peace and stability in the region … the world cannot support the establishment of a state that part of its regime is a terror organisation”. Israel’s hardline foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman, told the Army Radio station: “Hundreds of terrorists will flood the West Bank and therefore we need to prepare for a different situation.” The opposition leader, Tzipi Livni, urged the international community to put pressure on the Palestinians to ensure the new government renounced violence and recognised Israel’s right to exist. The two factions were persuaded by “friends in the Arab World and the European Union that it was time to finish the split”, said Faisal Abu Shahla, a Fatah legislator in the Gaza Strip. But some expressed scepticism about the extent of reconciliation. Mkhaimar Abusada, a professor of political science at al-Azhar University in Gaza, described the agreement as “a very vague format which will allow Palestinians to speak with one voice but, at a practical level, there will remain two separate entities in the West Bank and Gaza in terms of security. “Hamas will be able to maintain its militias and its rhetoric of resistance to Israel. There will not be many changes on the ground. Each one will be in charge of their territory,” he said. Hamas officials indicated that the organisation understood the unity agreement could be jeopardised by any militant operations. “We have to be careful of how we respond to Israel because they will do everything to dismantle the agreement,” said Ghazi Hamed, Hamas’s deputy foreign minister. “It is clear that Israel does not like us. They want to divide us because it gives them more power. I expect they will try to provoke us and create chaos to put pressure on Mahmoud Abbas. All sides admit that the agreement is the first step of a complicated process. Hamed said: ” The challenge will be to implement the agreement. If we succeed in choosing a strong PM and a strong minister of interior, we stand a better chance of success.” Abu Shahla said one consequence of the agreement would be that Fatah would be able to operate openly in Gaza for the first time since 2007 and Hamas would be able to do the same in the West Bank. Following the signing of the deal, Abbas may make his first visit to Gaza in more than four years. Palestinian territories Middle East Israel Hamas Fatah Gaza Conal Urquhart guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Tesco Price Check campaign changed

Shoppers boast they have claimed back hundreds of pounds from Asda comparison scheme “Every Little Helps” is Tesco’s motto but it turns out the supermarket doesn’t like it when its customers take the phrase too literally. The retail group, which announced annual profits of £3.8bn last week, has been forced to make another humiliating change to its Price Check promotional campaign after shoppers hijacked the deal and started “recycling” £20 refund coupons “just to make money”. Tesco styles itself as a consumer champion and the marketing push was supposed to demonstrate that its groceries were cheaper than Asda’s. Instead the campaign has proved something of an own goal with the promotion taking on a life of its own as savvy shoppers started boasting on internet forums that they had claimed back hundreds of pounds under the scheme. The original promotion, launched at the beginning of March, was to check the price of comparable groceries bought at Asda against its own and then refund “double the difference” to shoppers if Tesco was found to be more expensive. However, in one example, a customer shopping for MoneySavingExpert.com found that some alcohol, laundry products and pet food were far cheaper at Asda; he spent £126 at Tesco on a shop that would have cost £81 at Asda, and claimed a £90 voucher. Three weeks into the campaign Tesco started capping refunds at £20 and on Thursday the grocer watered down the benefits again. It said the promotion had unintentionally spawned a “cottage industry” of profit-seekers. Defending the decision to further dilute the terms of the deal, a Tesco spokesman said that while the vast majority of shoppers had used the scheme to check their “normal” shopping others were using it as a money-making venture: “Price Check and ‘double the difference’ have given rise to a cottage industry of savvy and determined people. We commend their ingenuity and determination, but that wasn’t why we set up Price Check.” Tesco, which rings up £1 in every £7 spent on the high street, said it would now only refund the difference between the two shops rather than twice the amount. The fiasco is an embarrassment for both Philip Clarke, the new Tesco chief executive, and UK head Richard Brasher who was promoted to the new post this year. This week industry data from Kantar Worldpanel showed that despite its leadership position, with a market share of 30.4%, it had lost sales to rivals including Waitrose and discount chains . At his maiden annual results last week Clarke broke with tradition by serving up some self-criticism . He admitted there had been a “loss of form”, but said it would fight back with more product innovation and by “sharpening up” the way its speaks to consumers. Other blunders Hoover free flights Hoover’s disastrous free flights offer has gone down in history as one of the biggest promotional blunders of all time. The company’s generous offer of two flight tickets to New York to every customer purchasing a vacuum cleaner over £100 led to its being inundated with disgruntled customers when the figures failed to add up. The blunder cost Hoover £48m and resulted in six years of court cases. Tesco bananas In 1997, Tesco’s offer of 25 clubcard points worth £1.25 for bananas costing £1.17 led one customer to buy nearly 1,000lbs of the fruit. But when Phil Calcott, a physicist, went back to the shop for more staff told him they would not take any more bulk orders. He made a profit of £25.12 on the bananas which he then gave away to passers-by. Pepsi in the Philippines Pepsi retracted a promotional offer of 1m pesos to anyone who found a bottletop with the number 349 printed on it in the Philippines, after it emerged that half a million winning bottle tops had been produced. Even after reducing their prize money to $19, Pepsi paid out a total of £13m to customers who thought they were rightful winners and sparked thousands of lawsuits as well as riots and attacks on bottle plants. Domino’s Pizza Dominos were forced to give away 11,000 free pizzas in the US after someone stumbled upon a trial online promotional code that had been scrapped. News of the code had spread to thousands online before Domino’s withdrew the code. Katie Loweth Tesco Asda Supermarkets Retail industry Consumer spending Zoe Wood guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Syria: EU to respond as death toll rises

Five hundred now dead in crackdown, monitors say, while talks begin to find an international response European governments will meet on Friday to discuss imposing sanctions on Syria, responding to the repression by the Assad regime by possibly imposing travel bans and freezing the bank accounts of the president and his relatives, and of key government figures. It comes as pressure on the Syrian regime increased after the resignation of hundreds of members of President Bashar al-Assad’s Ba’ath party in protest at the bloody crackdown, now believed to have claimed at least 500 lives. The situation is reported to be desperate in the southern city of Deraa, where the dissent began six weeks ago. It remains under siege from tanks of the ultra-loyal Fourth Mechanised Brigade, commanded by Assad’s brother, Maher, as well as, residents say, snipers and machine guns. With even basic supplies running out, locals said they were terrified to leave their homes. One told the Associated Press that 43 people had died in the city since the troops arrived on Monday, including a six-year-old girl shot by a sniper. More than 230 members of the party that has ruled Syria since 1963 announced their resignation on Wednesday night. “Considering the breakdown of values and emblems that we were instilled with by the party, and which were destroyed at the hand of the security forces … we announce our withdrawal from the party without regret,” said 30 party members from the coastal city of Banias in a letter. About 200 members from the southern Hauran region, which includes Deraa, also stood down. Senior officials from the 27 EU governments are to discuss sanctions on the Syrian leadership for the first time on Friday, with Britain, France, and Germany encouraging Catherine Ashton, the EU’s foreign policy chief, to draw up a list of the toughest measures. While opinion will split on how to respond to the crackdown, diplomats said no one was expected to block action agreed by a majority. The officials are to receive an intelligence briefing on the situation in Syria and are to discuss a range of options, from a mild slap on the wrist such as suspending an EU association agreement with Damascus, to more punitive measures such as a travel blacklist preventing prominent regime figures from travelling in the EU, and the freezing of bank accounts and other assets. Figures that would be targeted would be the president’s “extended family” and other key officials in the military and security apparatus, diplomats in Brussels said. While a tougher line is espoused by the EU’s big three, Germany, France, and Britain, as well as Denmark and the Netherlands, the Austrians are said to be lukewarm on sanctions, while the Swedish foreign minister, Carl Bildt, regularly voices his scepticism on the utility of sanctions against foreign governments. While the international response has so far been limited to stern words and vague threats – a divided UN security council is seen as unlikely to agree on sanctions – the US has raised the stakes by specifically linking the Syrian crackdown with its main antagonist in the region, Iran. The US ambassador to the UN, Susan Rice, said Washington was “very conscious of and concerned by the evidence of active Iranian involvement and support on behalf of the Syrian government and its repression of its people”. She refused to go into details. With outside media barred and many communications cut off, it has been impossible to verify the reports from Deraa. A series of residents have described dozens of corpses left in the streets and staple supplies including blood and baby formula running out. One local told Reuters: “Anyone who gets out will find a sniper ready to shoot him. They are not sparing anyone, men, women or children.” Large numbers of Syrian women and children have crossed into northern Lebanon to escape fighting, Reuters reported. Mahmood Khazaal, former mayor of the Lebanese border town of al-Buqaya, said 1,500 people had come on foot. The Syrian human rights organisation Sawasiah said that at least 500 civilians have been killed since protests demanding political freedom and an end to corruption erupted. There were also reports of fresh shooting in the Damascus suburb of Douma. Around 90 people were arrested and scores reportedly injured after tanks rolled into Madaya, a small mountain town 25 miles north-west of the capital. A witness told al-Jazeera he saw tanks and armoured personnel carriers surrounding Madaya, where all mobile and landline phone connections and electricity were cut from 4am until 9am. “We don’t understand why this is happening,” he said. “There were no plans for protests today and neither had any protests been held in the city in the past two days.” There have also been unconfirmed reports of limited dissent within the military, including soldiers from a regiment separate from the Fourth Mechanised Brigade refusing to fire on civilians in Deraa. The government denied there had been any splits in the military, which is seen as fiercely loyal to Assad. Opposition activists in Damascus were heartened by news of the Ba’ath party resignations. “It is only low-level but it shows that discontent is rippling through the ranks,” said one local analyst. Although the officials have no real power, splits from the party, whose position as the leading party in state and society is enshrined in the constitution, are rare. At least 10% of Syria’s population of 22 million is believed to belong to the party, which has as a long-standing power base the rural and poorer sections of society to which many protesters also belong. Despite the increasing death toll, activists are predicting more people will take to the streets following Friday prayers, often a time for dissent. Wissam Tarif, the executive director of human rights organisation Insan, told the Guardian: “Youth from many cities are saying they prefer death to silence and detentions.”ends Syria Middle East European Union Peter Walker Ian Traynor guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
US tornadoes were worst since 1974

Death toll exceeds 240 after severe storm batters south, with authorities warning of more to come The hilltop town of Rainsville, Alabama, bills itself as a peaceful area surrounded by beautiful ridges, valleys and lakes. By Thursday morning, after a mile-wide tornado had torn through six southern US states, killing at least 247 people, it almost seemed to have been erased from existence. “It looks like something just washed parts of the town off the map,” said Israel Partridge, a volunteer search and rescue worker. “Whole subdivisions, where there were 20 or 30 houses, there is nothing left. It is just totally gone. All that is left are the concrete steps leading up to rubble. It is not just that the houses have severe damage. They are gone.” By 3am on Thursday, when workers finally paused to rest, there were 35-45 bodies laid out at the fire department of a town with a population of 5,000, Partridge said. Rainsville, north-east of Birmingham, ranked among the towns worst hit by the dozens of tornadoes unleashed on the south. By midday, 230 people were confirmed dead across six states, with state officials warning the toll could rise. Barack Obama is due to visit the area on Friday. The national weather service said more than 100 tornadoes had a part in the destruction, the deadliest since a 1974 storm killed 315 people. The authorities were warning that further storms were on their way. “We are going to see more tornadoes and more severe weather across much of the south-east and into the north-east,” said Craig Fugate, the administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Service, in a video posted on the official website. The national weather service has issued a number of short-lived tornado warnings, stretching into areas as far north as New York and south as far as Florida. There were flash flood warnings for parts of New York, Pennsylvania, Missouri, Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, Arkansas, and Georgia. Severe thunderstorms were forecast for parts of Pennsylvania, New York, Vermont, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia and Georgia. But the weather service said further storms were unlikely to match the severity of Wednesday’s events. At least 162 people were killed in Alabama alone. Mississippi reported 32 dead, Tennessee 30. The governor of Alabama declared a state of emergency and mobilised the state’s 1,400 members of the national guard. Authorities reported that downed power lines and communications and blocked roads prevented them from gaining a full measure of the destruction. The tornadoes also forced a temporary shutdown at an Alabama nuclear plant, but the nuclear regulatory commission said there was no danger. Among the other towns reporting heavy casualties and damage was the city of Tuscaloosa, Alabama, which reported 36 killed. “I don’t know how anyone survived,” the city’s mayor, Walter Maddox, told reporters. “We’re used to tornadoes here in Tuscaloosa. It’s part of growing up. But when you look at the path of destruction that’s likely five to seven miles long in an area half a mile to a mile wide… it’s an amazing scene. There’s parts of the city I don’t recognise.” Similar scenes unfolded across the south, with television images of heavily damaged churches and government buildings. In many instances, houses were lifted clear off their concrete foundations, and slammed back down, crushing those seeking shelter. From his home on Lookout Mountain, about a 10-minute drive from Rainsville, Partridge said: “By the grace of God, where I was it just missed us. You could see it coming towards us and it dumped us with debris, but it took a turn and missed us.” But Rainsville absorbed the full force of the storm system. Landmarks such as the sports Coliseum were reduced to twisted rubble. An entire trailer park, which had housed 73 mobile homes, was destroyed. “Even the houses that made it suffered severe damage,” said Partridge. And still it was difficult to get a full measure of the destruction, with roads blocked by debris, tree trunks and downed power lines, and telephone lines and electricity still not fully restored. Meterologists are already ranking the storm as the worst since 1974. More disturbing, it seemed that America’s traditional “tornado alley” in the midwest had been undergoing a slow migration, with the danger zone now extending into the south-east. US weather forecasters had been warning for days of a powerful storm coming up out of the south-east. Schools were shut and many took a day off work. But a number of survivors said that they had not grasped the gravity of the situation. Some said that the warnings had been cut short by power failures, or that they had been caught off guard when cellphone towers went down. Others admitted that they had grown inured to severe weather warnings. “I believe it caught most people by surprise, or they believed that most portions of their homes would be secure enough when, in fact, most of their homes are completely gone,” Partridge said. United States Alabama Natural disasters and extreme weather Suzanne Goldenberg guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …