Click here to view this media Bill O’Reilly thinks it’s just shameful that liberals are calling out the Birthers for their racism so hlast ight he brought on Margaret Hoover and Alicia Menendez to talk about it. Of course, Hoover thought it was entirely “predictable” that people would decry the innate racism of the Birther theories and their progenitors — which is like saying it’s “predictable” people would be distraught by a terrorist attack. Then Menendez sort of agreed with Hoover, but added: MENENDEZ: There are big conversations we need to be having about the fact that there are so many racial tensions and anxieties in this country. O’REILLY: Well, let me stop you there. MENENDEZ: When you start calling people racist… O’REILLY: Let me stop you there. I don’t see all of these racial confrontations in this country, and I do this every day. What I see is Barack Obama elected president with 43 percent of the white vote. He got something like 67 percent of the Hispanic vote. I don’t see it. And unless you can show it to me, Alicia… … Look, wouldn’t you both agree that calling somebody a racist, anybody, without proof beyond a reasonable doubt is a vicious, hateful thing to do? Would you agree? MENENDEZ: As vicious as suggesting that the president of the United States is not a real American. O’REILLY: No, no, no. Just answer my question, Alicia. Calling somebody a racist without proof beyond a reasonable doubt, a vicious, hateful thing, yes or no? MENENDEZ: I agree. O’REILLY: OK, you agree. MENENDEZ: I think that part of the reason you see that rhetoric… O’REILLY: Now we have a cadre of people on national television doing a vicious, hateful thing. Yet… MENENDEZ: But Bill, they’re doing it in response to what was a vicious and hateful thing coming out of the right. And there were very few people like you who are being honest and calling it what it was. O’REILLY: No. 1, you don’t commit bad behavior and point to other bad behavior. And what came out of the right — that’s true, Alicia. Write it down. Don’t justify bad behavior by pointing to other. Wait a minute. And the second thing is what came out of the right and was absolutely blown apart on this broadcast was the birth certificate might be phony. I didn’t think that had any racial overtone at all. It was a birth certificate deal. MENENDEZ: So you think — you think it’s just coincidental that the first president to have this type of public questioning of his land of origin of being a real American happens to be our first black president? That’s just a weird coincidence? O’REILLY: It’s born out of hatred for the man. They’ll get — the people who hate Barack Obama will latch onto anything. S’funny: Do any of you remember Bill O’Reilly getting all outraged and denouncing Glenn Beck when he called President Obama a racist who hates white people? Hm? No, I seem instead to recall him launching a multi-city “speaking” tour with Beck. Strange how O’Reilly’s rather selective outrage works, isn’t it? What’s especially noteworthy is that he and Margaret Hoover seem to believe that we’re long past the days of naked racism and bigotry and that racial tensions don’t really exist. Let me point them first to Baratunde Thurston’s reply to Donald Trump on that score. Or, for that matter, to those little ol’ jus’ folks Tea Partiers who strangely seem unable to avoid racist outbreaks . And nevermind that the Birthers are still going strong, even on Fox. And seriously: Does O’Reilly believe that these nutcases continue to cling to their Birther beliefs, even after Obama has gotten out his long form too for them, simply because they hate Obama? And that their hatred of Obama has no basis in his race? And he expects the rest of us to be that naive? Really? He better rename his show’s motto “The New Spin Zone”.
Continue reading …The pastor who preached the Easter sermon that Barack Obama heard this past Sunday is not another Jeremiah Wright, Time's Amy Sullivan insists in an April 29 blog “Swampland” blog post entitled “Conservatives Go After Another Obama Pastor.” Sullivan was responding to the complaints of conservative talkers Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity, who highlighted some controversial remarks Smith made to a college audience last year: What got these two conservative media giants atwitter was a speech Smith gave last year at Eastern University in Pennsylvania–the school where evangelical pastor and speaker Tony Campolo is based. He was asked to speak about racism and offered some thoughts that included the assertion that racism still exists in the United States. There were two important details about the speech: 1) It was taped; and 2) Smith singled out Fox News and Limbaugh by name.
Continue reading …The pastor who preached the Easter sermon that Barack Obama heard this past Sunday is not another Jeremiah Wright, Time's Amy Sullivan insists in an April 29 blog “Swampland” blog post entitled “Conservatives Go After Another Obama Pastor.” Sullivan was responding to the complaints of conservative talkers Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity, who highlighted some controversial remarks Smith made to a college audience last year: What got these two conservative media giants atwitter was a speech Smith gave last year at Eastern University in Pennsylvania–the school where evangelical pastor and speaker Tony Campolo is based. He was asked to speak about racism and offered some thoughts that included the assertion that racism still exists in the United States. There were two important details about the speech: 1) It was taped; and 2) Smith singled out Fox News and Limbaugh by name.
Continue reading …Forget republicanism – the closest Britain got to a revolution is people pushing down barricades and rushing to the palace Whether it was history repeating itself as history, or farce repeating itself as farce, depends entirely on your point of view. The marriage of His Royal Highness Prince William to Catherine Middleton was washed down by that cocktail of fevered excitement and irate lack of interest that constitutes public opinion these days – so consider it a day when the country split into two, with each side accusing the other of madness. Much like a standard marital row, in fact. But along with binge-drinking and misplaced self-regard, royal occasions are something at which Britain is undeniably world class, and anyone still poised for a republic is advised to put down their knitting needles. As the cameras trained on the Queen’s rather shabby net curtains, awaiting the couple’s balcony kiss, one costumed wellwisher told the BBC the crowds had initially been held back. “But in the end,” she explained, “the people just pushed the barricades down and rushed towards the palace.” And that’s as close to the French Revolution as we’re going to get – a sort of love-storming of the Bastille. It all read like a recipe for the perfect British day: worries about the weather, lots of mentions of Princess Di, and a chance to talk about the class system. Even the Germans obliged by having a pop at us, with Der Spiegel’s London correspondent wondering “why this eccentric nation continues to worship the Windsors”. The answer, perhaps, is because there is no quality more English than the country’s ability to suspend its disbelief again and again – be it in the buildup to a World Cup quarter-final, or when faced with the latest iteration of the House of Windsor story. People know that most of the royal family’s recent marriages have been fairytales. Grimm. But something allows the excitement to rebuild, and anyone who begrudged the gazillions who camped out to spend their day cheering and waving flags had a sobering televisual alternative: ITV2′s back-to-back screening of The Only Way is Essex. As for the marriage ceremony, it was watched by luminaries from the Beckhams to the Bercows to the alleged former head of the Bahraini torture service. To the left, the king of this; to the right, the queen of that. The last time Carole Middleton had to proceed down an aisle this intimidating she was pushing a trolley and uttering the dreaded words “I’m afraid we’ve run out of the chicken.” But for all the confected snobbery about Kate’s origins, and her black sheep uncle Gary, the bourgeois preoccupations of the buildup could never have withstood the big guns of the occasion. In truth, there is scarcely a piece of British heritage so vulgar or outrageous that it cannot be somehow softened and folded into this most oddly enduring of myths. During his apprenticeship on Savile Row, the late Alexander McQueen famously sewed “I AM A CUNT” into the lining of a suit jacket being made for Prince Charles. Yet today, the newest member of the House of Windsor was dressed by the house of McQueen, itself renewed dazzlingly by the succession of Sarah Burton. At Westminster Abbey itself, two establishments fought for prominence. The Beckhams – who you’ll recall sat on thrones at their own wedding – queued like hoi polloi to get in, while megastar Elton John travelled in steerage at the back of the nave, miles behind various ancient but unidentifiable aristos who haven’t been playing with a full order of service since the old king was on the throne. The telly cameras immediately overrode their protocol function, and were far more interested in cutting to the celebs than any of the more recherché foreign dignitaries. Thus it was possible to see that neither the Queen nor Victoria Beckham knows the words to Jerusalem off by heart, with both filmed relying intently on their order of service. Incidentally, we must doff our plastic coronets to the choice of William Blake’s brilliantly mad and mystical hymn of nostalgia for something that never really existed, but which does bring the neck hairs to attention on the big occasion. The only reading was from Romans. “Bless those who persecute you,” intoned Kate’s brother James, pausing to allow the reference to the press to sink in. “Bless and do not curse them.” Most overused phrase of the day? “A very modern love story”, followed by telly commentators’ dreary emphasis on the fact that William and Kate were “very down-to-earth people”, as though all the nation wanted out of a monarchy were a former accessories buyer for Jigsaw and a groom spawned in the hellfires of the House of Windsor, but now merely keen to make his name as a mid-ranking air-sea rescue operative. The day frequently couldn’t make its mind up. On the one hand, loyal subjects were supposed to be impressed that minor royals had foregone horsedrawn carriages and were being shuttled in minibuses. On the other, they were expected to develop a sudden yet obsessive interest in state arcana – the provenance of gold altar plates, the engraving of a ceremonial bridle, the fact that the Green Drawing Room at Buckingham Palace opens into the White Drawing Room. We’re all supposed to be semioticians now, so do feel encouraged to speculate on what Prince Harry calling himself “best man” as opposed to the more traditional “supporter” means for modern Britain, or what Samantha Cameron’s failure to wear a hat means for your local Sure Start centre. As for what’s next, you need hardly ask. ITV’s coverage of the wedding kicked off at 0600 hours, and it took all the way until 06.16 before sofa-based royal expert Eve Pollard had declared firmly: “We want an Olympics baby.” So there you have it. Royal uterus watch begins today. Royal wedding Monarchy Weddings Kate Middleton Prince William Republicanism Marina Hyde guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Forget republicanism – the closest Britain got to a revolution is people pushing down barricades and rushing to the palace Whether it was history repeating itself as history, or farce repeating itself as farce, depends entirely on your point of view. The marriage of His Royal Highness Prince William to Catherine Middleton was washed down by that cocktail of fevered excitement and irate lack of interest that constitutes public opinion these days – so consider it a day when the country split into two, with each side accusing the other of madness. Much like a standard marital row, in fact. But along with binge-drinking and misplaced self-regard, royal occasions are something at which Britain is undeniably world class, and anyone still poised for a republic is advised to put down their knitting needles. As the cameras trained on the Queen’s rather shabby net curtains, awaiting the couple’s balcony kiss, one costumed wellwisher told the BBC the crowds had initially been held back. “But in the end,” she explained, “the people just pushed the barricades down and rushed towards the palace.” And that’s as close to the French Revolution as we’re going to get – a sort of love-storming of the Bastille. It all read like a recipe for the perfect British day: worries about the weather, lots of mentions of Princess Di, and a chance to talk about the class system. Even the Germans obliged by having a pop at us, with Der Spiegel’s London correspondent wondering “why this eccentric nation continues to worship the Windsors”. The answer, perhaps, is because there is no quality more English than the country’s ability to suspend its disbelief again and again – be it in the buildup to a World Cup quarter-final, or when faced with the latest iteration of the House of Windsor story. People know that most of the royal family’s recent marriages have been fairytales. Grimm. But something allows the excitement to rebuild, and anyone who begrudged the gazillions who camped out to spend their day cheering and waving flags had a sobering televisual alternative: ITV2′s back-to-back screening of The Only Way is Essex. As for the marriage ceremony, it was watched by luminaries from the Beckhams to the Bercows to the alleged former head of the Bahraini torture service. To the left, the king of this; to the right, the queen of that. The last time Carole Middleton had to proceed down an aisle this intimidating she was pushing a trolley and uttering the dreaded words “I’m afraid we’ve run out of the chicken.” But for all the confected snobbery about Kate’s origins, and her black sheep uncle Gary, the bourgeois preoccupations of the buildup could never have withstood the big guns of the occasion. In truth, there is scarcely a piece of British heritage so vulgar or outrageous that it cannot be somehow softened and folded into this most oddly enduring of myths. During his apprenticeship on Savile Row, the late Alexander McQueen famously sewed “I AM A CUNT” into the lining of a suit jacket being made for Prince Charles. Yet today, the newest member of the House of Windsor was dressed by the house of McQueen, itself renewed dazzlingly by the succession of Sarah Burton. At Westminster Abbey itself, two establishments fought for prominence. The Beckhams – who you’ll recall sat on thrones at their own wedding – queued like hoi polloi to get in, while megastar Elton John travelled in steerage at the back of the nave, miles behind various ancient but unidentifiable aristos who haven’t been playing with a full order of service since the old king was on the throne. The telly cameras immediately overrode their protocol function, and were far more interested in cutting to the celebs than any of the more recherché foreign dignitaries. Thus it was possible to see that neither the Queen nor Victoria Beckham knows the words to Jerusalem off by heart, with both filmed relying intently on their order of service. Incidentally, we must doff our plastic coronets to the choice of William Blake’s brilliantly mad and mystical hymn of nostalgia for something that never really existed, but which does bring the neck hairs to attention on the big occasion. The only reading was from Romans. “Bless those who persecute you,” intoned Kate’s brother James, pausing to allow the reference to the press to sink in. “Bless and do not curse them.” Most overused phrase of the day? “A very modern love story”, followed by telly commentators’ dreary emphasis on the fact that William and Kate were “very down-to-earth people”, as though all the nation wanted out of a monarchy were a former accessories buyer for Jigsaw and a groom spawned in the hellfires of the House of Windsor, but now merely keen to make his name as a mid-ranking air-sea rescue operative. The day frequently couldn’t make its mind up. On the one hand, loyal subjects were supposed to be impressed that minor royals had foregone horsedrawn carriages and were being shuttled in minibuses. On the other, they were expected to develop a sudden yet obsessive interest in state arcana – the provenance of gold altar plates, the engraving of a ceremonial bridle, the fact that the Green Drawing Room at Buckingham Palace opens into the White Drawing Room. We’re all supposed to be semioticians now, so do feel encouraged to speculate on what Prince Harry calling himself “best man” as opposed to the more traditional “supporter” means for modern Britain, or what Samantha Cameron’s failure to wear a hat means for your local Sure Start centre. As for what’s next, you need hardly ask. ITV’s coverage of the wedding kicked off at 0600 hours, and it took all the way until 06.16 before sofa-based royal expert Eve Pollard had declared firmly: “We want an Olympics baby.” So there you have it. Royal uterus watch begins today. Royal wedding Monarchy Weddings Kate Middleton Prince William Republicanism Marina Hyde guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …So what are we supposed to believe — what Paul Ryan says at a town hall meeting, or what Ryan says with the way he votes? I’d say the latter is a safe bet. From Think Progress — Paul Ryan Endorses Ending Oil Subsidies, Even Though He Voted For Them : Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) agreed to end subsidies to oil companies during a town hall in Waterford, Wisconsin, this morning, eliciting great applause from an overflow crowd in a very conservative section of his district. “We also want to get rid of corporate welfare,” Ryan insisted. “So we propose to repeal all that”: Q: The subsidy for the oil companies that the federal government gives. They’ve gotta stop. RYAN: Sure . Q: End the oil company subsidies… RYAN: I agree . Q: …and you will gain a lot of that money in the red back. More there on Ryan’s voting record so go read the rest. If anyone actually believes that Republicans are going to throw one of their major campaign donors under the bus, as they noted, all you have to do is look at John Boehner’s whiplash on the subject .
Continue reading …They say it may be historic , possibly on a par with the “super outbreak” of April 1974, when 148 tornados in 13 states killed 335 people: Veteran tornado watchers saw Wednesday’s mega-twisters coming. But they were still staggered by the destruction that a massive storm system unleashed across the Southeast that leveled broad swaths of Tuscaloosa, Ala., and killed more than 280 people. “I’ve been at this for a while, and I’ve never seen anything like this,” said Chris Weiss, an associate professor of atmospheric science at Texas Tech University in Lubbock, Tex. Some of Wednesday’s tornadoes could have traveled dozens, or perhaps even hundreds, of miles before eventually dissipating. Typical twisters survive only minutes. Based on early observations, a few of the twisters probably were more than a mile wide, Weiss said. As of Thursday evening, there had been 173 reports of twisters touching down in the U.S. on Wednesday , said Greg Carbin, warning coordination meteorologist for the National Weather Service’s Storm Prediction Center in Norman, Okla. That number of reports might be typical for an entire April, he said. This year’s national preliminary tornado estimate for April has already hit 600, with several days left to go. “We will finish out with more in this April than in any month we’ve seen in the last 60 years ,” Carbin said. “It’s really hard, even for me, to get my mind around that number.” This year, the winds from the Gulf of Mexico have been “exceptionally warm and humid for this early in the spring,” Ostro said. Those warm winds from the south blew close to the ground this week while a very strong jet stream came in from the west higher up.
Continue reading …• 24 killed in Deraa after thousands take to streets • UN approves inquiry into government violence Thousands of Syrians defied their government’s bloody attempts to suppress protests, braving gunfire from security forces to demonstrate in Damascus and across the country. Initial reports said at least 24 people had been shot dead, most of them in the opposition stronghold of Deraa, where villagers tried to break through the security cordon to relieve its besieged population. Further deaths were reported in Latakia and Homs after the security forces opened fire on demonstrators. There was news of protests in 50 towns and villages including Hama, Aleppo, the coastal cities of Latakia and Banias, Deir Ezzor in the east, and Qamishli in the north-east. Unrest was also reported from the Syria-Jordan border, which is straddled by the Haurani tribes. Despite the government crackdown, the demonstrations – many starting as Friday worshippers left mosques – appeared to be at least as big as last week. Even more significantly, activists said, the protests spread closer into the centre of Damascus. Demonstrators in the neighbourhoods of Barzeh, Midan, Bab Srejeh and Hajr al-Aswad faced security forces backed up by soldiers for the first time. Two witnesses in Midan told the Guardian that a crowd of 4,000 protesters who came out of Zain al-Abideen and Hassan mosques were dispersed by tear gas and security forces with batons. “I counted 17 buses of security,” said one who asked not to be named. Another said tear gas and sound bombs were used and the street to the main hospital was closed. He said shabiha [gangs connected to the ruling family] were terrorising the neighbourhood well after the demonstration was dispersed. Meanwhile, the international community stepped up its pressure on Damascus. The UN human rights council in Geneva approved an investigation of the Syrian use of violence against protesters and called for the immediate release of political prisoners and the lifting of restrictions on the press and the internet. The US-drafted resolution passed despite the resistance of Russia, China and some Arab and African countries. However, it was watered down to omit mention of Syria’s currently unopposed candidacy to join the council itself. The UK envoy to the council, Peter Gooderham, said there could be “no impunity” for those who have committed human rights violations. “Those in power can see violations being committed in their name,” he said. “They are accountable too for the violence and the deaths, even more so if they do nothing to stop these actions.” The US was expected to announce sanctions targeted at Syria’s intelligence agency and member’s of Bashar al-Assad’s family. Reuters news agency quoted one official as saying that Maher al-Assad, Bashar’s brother, and Atif Najib, a cousin, were among the five targets The source said Mahir Assad is a brigade commander in the 4th Armoured Division that has played a key role in Deraa. EU officials also debated similar sanctions in Brussels but these will not come into force until a ministerial meeting which may not take place for weeks. Next month, western diplomats said Damascus could come under pressure from another direction. They say Yukiya Amano, the director general of the UN’s International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), will state Syria had been developing a nuclear reactor at a desert site bombed by Israel in 2007. Syria has denied that the western allegations that the site at Dair Alzour was intended to produce plutonium for a weapons programme. Until now, the IAEA has sought more information before making a judgment but has been blocked by the government. If Amano declares Dair Alzour was in fact such a reactor, it could lead to Syria being referred to the UN Security Council for scrutiny of its nuclear ambitions. “We do expect Amano to come up with tougher language in the next report,” a western diplomat told the Guardian. “That could either lead the way to a resolution by the IAEA board or a referral to the security council.” At the demonstrations, many of the protesters chanted “We are not afraid” and voiced solidarity with Deraa where more than 50 people were killed in the last week alone. A devastating picture has been emerging from the city. Residents say bread and water are lacking and sewing needles are being used to stitch up wounds as medical supplies run low. The crackdown has extended to other cities and towns including Douma and Tartous which have been raided and the army setting up checkpoints. Activists said residents of Douma had not been allowed out to pray, whilst residents of Zabadani, where water and electricity have been cut off, broke their siege to march on the neighbouring town of Madaya, both in rural Damascus. Human rights monitors in Damascus said the protests were significant, coming in the wake of the most brutal week yet. The government had warned against holding any demonstrations on Friday. Syrian media said the interior ministry had not approved any “march, demonstration or sit-ins”. “It is significant that people came out today,” said Razan Zeitouneh, a lawyer and activist in Damascus. “After all the violence, after bringing the military inside and around the cities, cutting water, electricity and communications, still people came out.” Syria Arab and Middle East unrest Bashar Al-Assad United Nations Middle East Human rights Julian Borger guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …• 24 killed in Deraa after thousands take to streets • UN approves inquiry into government violence Thousands of Syrians defied their government’s bloody attempts to suppress protests, braving gunfire from security forces to demonstrate in Damascus and across the country. Initial reports said at least 24 people had been shot dead, most of them in the opposition stronghold of Deraa, where villagers tried to break through the security cordon to relieve its besieged population. Further deaths were reported in Latakia and Homs after the security forces opened fire on demonstrators. There was news of protests in 50 towns and villages including Hama, Aleppo, the coastal cities of Latakia and Banias, Deir Ezzor in the east, and Qamishli in the north-east. Unrest was also reported from the Syria-Jordan border, which is straddled by the Haurani tribes. Despite the government crackdown, the demonstrations – many starting as Friday worshippers left mosques – appeared to be at least as big as last week. Even more significantly, activists said, the protests spread closer into the centre of Damascus. Demonstrators in the neighbourhoods of Barzeh, Midan, Bab Srejeh and Hajr al-Aswad faced security forces backed up by soldiers for the first time. Two witnesses in Midan told the Guardian that a crowd of 4,000 protesters who came out of Zain al-Abideen and Hassan mosques were dispersed by tear gas and security forces with batons. “I counted 17 buses of security,” said one who asked not to be named. Another said tear gas and sound bombs were used and the street to the main hospital was closed. He said shabiha [gangs connected to the ruling family] were terrorising the neighbourhood well after the demonstration was dispersed. Meanwhile, the international community stepped up its pressure on Damascus. The UN human rights council in Geneva approved an investigation of the Syrian use of violence against protesters and called for the immediate release of political prisoners and the lifting of restrictions on the press and the internet. The US-drafted resolution passed despite the resistance of Russia, China and some Arab and African countries. However, it was watered down to omit mention of Syria’s currently unopposed candidacy to join the council itself. The UK envoy to the council, Peter Gooderham, said there could be “no impunity” for those who have committed human rights violations. “Those in power can see violations being committed in their name,” he said. “They are accountable too for the violence and the deaths, even more so if they do nothing to stop these actions.” The US was expected to announce sanctions targeted at Syria’s intelligence agency and member’s of Bashar al-Assad’s family. Reuters news agency quoted one official as saying that Maher al-Assad, Bashar’s brother, and Atif Najib, a cousin, were among the five targets The source said Mahir Assad is a brigade commander in the 4th Armoured Division that has played a key role in Deraa. EU officials also debated similar sanctions in Brussels but these will not come into force until a ministerial meeting which may not take place for weeks. Next month, western diplomats said Damascus could come under pressure from another direction. They say Yukiya Amano, the director general of the UN’s International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), will state Syria had been developing a nuclear reactor at a desert site bombed by Israel in 2007. Syria has denied that the western allegations that the site at Dair Alzour was intended to produce plutonium for a weapons programme. Until now, the IAEA has sought more information before making a judgment but has been blocked by the government. If Amano declares Dair Alzour was in fact such a reactor, it could lead to Syria being referred to the UN Security Council for scrutiny of its nuclear ambitions. “We do expect Amano to come up with tougher language in the next report,” a western diplomat told the Guardian. “That could either lead the way to a resolution by the IAEA board or a referral to the security council.” At the demonstrations, many of the protesters chanted “We are not afraid” and voiced solidarity with Deraa where more than 50 people were killed in the last week alone. A devastating picture has been emerging from the city. Residents say bread and water are lacking and sewing needles are being used to stitch up wounds as medical supplies run low. The crackdown has extended to other cities and towns including Douma and Tartous which have been raided and the army setting up checkpoints. Activists said residents of Douma had not been allowed out to pray, whilst residents of Zabadani, where water and electricity have been cut off, broke their siege to march on the neighbouring town of Madaya, both in rural Damascus. Human rights monitors in Damascus said the protests were significant, coming in the wake of the most brutal week yet. The government had warned against holding any demonstrations on Friday. Syrian media said the interior ministry had not approved any “march, demonstration or sit-ins”. “It is significant that people came out today,” said Razan Zeitouneh, a lawyer and activist in Damascus. “After all the violence, after bringing the military inside and around the cities, cutting water, electricity and communications, still people came out.” Syria Arab and Middle East unrest Bashar Al-Assad United Nations Middle East Human rights Julian Borger guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …