Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 1232)
Medvedev wants to stay president

Medvedev set to defy pact with prime minister Vladimir Putin and seek second term, claims prominent politician President Dmitry Medvedev is pushing to extend his tenure in the Kremlin against the wishes of Russia’s powerful prime minister, Vladimir Putin, a senior politician from the country’s ruling party has told the Guardian. Konstantin Zatulin, a prominent MP with United Russia, which dominates parliament and is headed by Putin, said Medvedev’s allies were waging a campaign to undermine the prime minister behind a public facade of unity between the two men. Until recently it was widely assumed that Medvedev would not run in presidential elections next March, so that Putin could return to his old job and serve two more terms to 2024. Most analysts had presumed that Putin would put himself forward while Medvedev would bow out meekly after a single term. However, Zatulin said in an interview that the president’s aides were jockeying to keep him in the Kremlin by eroding Putin’s support in parliament. “Medvedev wants to stay, he has broken the agreement and now Putin will have to persuade him to back off,” he said. His words highlight a deepening rift between Russia’s ruling duo. Putin has emphasised his credentials as a conservative statist who rejects “liberal experiments”, in what analysts interpreted as a bold pitch for the presidency. Medvedev, by contrast, has pushed his image as a tech-savvy moderniser and anti-corruption crusader. He recently removed top members of government from the boards of state companies such as oil giant Rosneft in favour of independent directors, a move seen as a blow to Putin’s “Kremlin Inc” view of the economy. The split extends to foreign policy, where Medvedev promotes the “resetting” of relations with Washington, while Putin has nurtured his image as a hawk who rejects US unilateralism. When Putin likened western military intervention in Libya to “medieval calls for crusades” last month, the president condemned the phrase a few hours later as “unacceptable”. While Medvedev has no party, Putin leads United Russia, which he uses to exert control over parliament, regional leaders and the bureaucracy. The party has said that Putin is its preferred candidate, and that it will consider supporting Medvedev only if the prime minister does not run. Medvedev, on the other hand, wields clout through his huge presidential administration, and via influential aides who can manipulate party politics and state media. Zatulin, the MP, was drawn into the conflict last month when he was removed from his post as deputy chairman of a Duma committee, in what he says was a punishment by Medvedev’s political fixers inside United Russia for statements he made in the chamber supporting Putin’s “Crusades” comments. He said that Kremlin aides – including the powerful ideologue, Vladislav Surkov — were also secretly cultivating a minor party, Fair Russia, as a potential vehicle for Medvedev. The party could be given a new leader such as the popular nationalist and representative to Nato, Dmitry Rogozin, and then be boosted with huge administrative support in the run up to parliamentary elections in December, Zatulin said, providing Medvedev a platform for his bid to the presidency three months later. Zatulin said: “Medvedev has decided to put himself forward [as a presidential candidate]. He feels inspired and he senses a certain support.” Asked if Putin and Medvedev might go head to head, the politician replied: “Yes, I think so.” Other observers are also putting their money on Medvedev as the preferred candidate, though most of these think he will stand unopposed. The president, a lawyer, took up his post in 2008 after he was endorsed by the outgoing Putin, 58, who had spent eight years in the Kremlin but could not stand for a third consecutive term. Putin, a former KGB officer, then stepped into the prime ministerial role, from which he has appeared to take the lead in Russia’s ruling tandem, known collectively to wags as either “PutiMed” or “MedvePut”. Stanislav Belkovsky, a well-connected political commentator said that differences between the pair were “no more than between man and wife”. He believes they have already decided together that Medvedev will be the one to go forward. “For both of them, Medvedev is the best choice for the elections,” he said. “The ruling elite have many business interests and they want to legalise their capital abroad. They need to feel at home in New York and London, so nobody points a finger when they walk into the lobby bar at the Lanesborough or the Dorchester. “Medvedev is seen overseas as western-leaning and liberal so he is better placed than Putin to finish this cynical process.” The choice of candidate will almost certainly determine who becomes Russia’s next president. Political forces opposing the Kremlin have been systematically marginalised, so the emergence of a popular competing figure is practically impossible. Putin and Medvedev have respectable, if slipping, popularity ratings which can also be shored up by falsifying election results, a common practice over the past decade. Yet intrigue remains. On a visit to Sweden last week Putin was asked by journalists whether he intended to run. “It is still too early to tell,” he replied. “The time will come, and we will make the appropriate decision. You will like it. You will be satisfied.” That response prompted fresh speculation that either Medvedev – seen to be the favoured candidate in Washington and many European capitals – will run, or that both men will go to the polls, in a show of democratic competition. In another sign of nervousness in the ruling elite last week, Gleb Pavlovsky, a veteran spin doctor and adviser to the presidential administration, had his pass to the Kremlin revoked. Pavlovsky told reporters he was ousted for being too vocal in his support of the president at a time of tension in the tandem, and for saying – in a criticism of Putin – that Medvedev’s first term should not become “some recess in one person’s endless governance”. In spite of Medvedev’s ambitions, many Russians remain convinced that it is Putin who will muscle his way back to the Kremlin. They say that he is desperate to regain the top job, whatever his partner’s wishes. “I’m 80% certain that Putin will be the candidate,” said Vladimir Ryzhkov, a leader of Russia’s small democratic opposition, in an interview at his basement office in southern Moscow. “These three years he has kept up a pre-election campaign, driving yellow Ladas around the country, kissing snow leopards, firing crossbows at whales, putting out fires. And that’s allowed him to remain the most popular politician in the country.” Ryzhkov agreed that Medvedev was agitating to preserve his position, but argued that had only succeeded in firing up his opponents. “His recent behaviour has begun to irritate and frighten the people around Putin,” he said, predicting that the prime minister would stand alone. Zatulin, however, said he was convinced that Medvedev would run for the presidency. Asked if Putin could talk his protege out of competing in the election, he said: “Personally, I don’t think so. The point of no return has already been passed.” Russia Vladimir Putin Dmitry Medvedev Tom Parfitt guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Headteachers to ballot for strike

National Association of Head Teachers general secretary predicts ‘mass exodus’ in row over pensions Headteachers have set themselves on a collision course with the education secretary, Michael Gove, and the coalition government after voting overwhelmingly to ballot for their first national strike. At their annual conference in Brighton, members of Britain’s biggest headteachers’ union – the National Association of Head Teachers (NAHT) – agreed to vote on whether to take industrial action in protest at proposed changes to their pensions. Of the 386 voters, 99.6% wanted a ballot, while 0.4% abstained. It is now highly likely, according to the NAHT, that heads will vote in favour of a strike – a move that would close thousands of primary and secondary schools in England and Wales and affect millions of children. It comes after two of the country’s main teaching unions voted to ballot members for a national strike over the proposals last month. The National Union of Teachers and the Association of Teachers and Lecturers are likely to strike in June and again in the autumn. Lecturers staged a walkout over the same issue in March. The NAHT is generally known to take a moderate stance so its decision to ballot will be all the more difficult for ministers. The union said the ballot would be held in the autumn. A government-commissioned report in March by the former Labour minister Lord Hutton called for final salary pension schemes to be scrapped and replaced with career averages for public sector workers. He recommended that public sector staff should pay higher monthly contributions and called for a rise in the retirement age to 68 – most heads now retire aged 60 to 65. The government has forecast that the cost of teachers’ pensions will rise from about £5bn in 2005 to almost £10bn by 2015 as more staff retire and life expectancy increases. Russell Hobby, the NAHT’s general secretary, said the proposed pension reforms would amount to a major pay cut and encouraged his 28,000 members to vote in favour of a strike. The NAHT said Hutton’s proposals would mean a head earning £50,000 would have to pay an extra £1,700 in pension contributions each year and a head retiring aged 55 would lose 42% of his or her pension. Hobby said it was essential that the existing pension arrangements remained, and predicted a “mass exodus” from the profession if it did not. When the teachers’ pension scheme was changed in 2007, there was a spike in the number of retirements. Heads argue that the teachers’ pension scheme is not in deficit, unlike some other public sector workers’ schemes, and so does not need to be changed. Speaking to the NAHT conference, Gove said public sector pensions had to be reformed given the “dire economic situation the government has inherited”. However, he said he recognised that teachers had a “unique compact” with the government under which their pension compensated for earning less than if they had chosen another profession. “We will consult openly with you … and I will be a champion for the interests of educational professionals,” he said. “We acknowledge that one size doesn’t fit when it comes to pensions. “There has been an unspoken compact between teachers and the state which balances the way that pensions and pay operates.” The government is expected to announce its proposals for pensions in the autumn following negotiations with the Trades Union Congress. The Department for Education said teachers’ pensions needed to be reformed because, in the early 1970s, 60-year-olds were expected to live for another 18 years but that had now risen to about 28 years. But headteachers threatened to refuse to co-operate with the government – and possibly stage strikes – unless their pensions were protected. Chris Hill, headteacher of Hounslow Town primary in London, said heads should look into refusing to co-operate with the government over new initiatives if the changes went ahead. “We can be very effective in getting our way,” he said. Chris Howard, headteacher of Lewis secondary school in Caerphilly, said a pension was an “integral part of the pay bargain that every public sector worker makes with the government”. “The bargain we make is that we give ourselves and our service as public servants for our life and, in the end, we expect some time where we can accrue public benefit for that. If the government proceeds down this path of pension changes then the bargain will be broken and our society will be the poorer for it.” Stephen Kirkpatrick, a 36-year-old deputy headteacher in Salford, said that although he loved teaching, he would be prepared to quit if the changes went ahead. “That is a mindset common to people who are young in the profession.” Gove also told the conference that heads would be able to fire incompetent teachers more quickly under plans to be published by the government next month. At the moment, it takes heads at least two years to sack weak teachers and much longer if they claim they have been bullied or go on long-term leave for stress. “Our proposals will make it easier and quicker to get rid of underperforming teachers,” Gove said. “We are going to make the process faster and simpler and we will deal with some of the most notorious dodges which have been used by teachers.” Teaching Schools Trade unions Education policy Public sector cuts Public sector pay Public sector pensions Pensions Jessica Shepherd guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Lou Dobbs Loves Free Market Capitalism When it Comes to Exxon Mobil’s Profits, Not so Much for Unions’ Right to Strike

Click here to view this media Apparently Lou Dobbs is terribly upset with the National Labor Relations Board’s decision to try to stop Boeing from punishing their unions for striking in Washington by moving their jobs to South Carolina, but he loves “free market capitalism” when it comes to Exxon Mobil’s ability to rake in record breaking profits. As the Hill reported — Exxon posts $10.7B first-quarter profit : Oil giant Exxon Mobil Corp. reported a $10.65 billion first-quarter profit Thursday, a 69 percent jump from the same period last year that will likely fuel political battles over U.S. oil-and-gas policy. The company is benefiting from higher refining margins, but also a surge in the price of oil that has led to $4 per gallon gas prices in the U.S. It’s also made oil companies a rich political target for the White House. Exxon’s profits are its highest since its record in 2008, when it posted profits of $10.9 billion in the first quarter, $11.7 billion in the second quarter and $14.8 billion in the third quarter (and $45 billion for the year). But the liberal Center for American Progress is holding a call for reporters later Thursday that will take a very different view of the industry earnings. The group parlayed the profits into a shot at GOP budget plans. “As the first quarter profits from the big five oil companies roll in, so do the $40 billion in taxpayer subsidies to these already highly lucrative oil companies through the next decade — preserved in Rep. Paul Ryan’s 2012 budget by gutting $30 billion from Medicare,” the center said in an advisory previewing the call. Ryan (R-Wis.) chairs the House Budget Committee. “While Big Oil rakes in windfall profit margins, they do nothing to ease the record-high prices facing American consumers at the pump and slowing our economic recovery,” the group added. There’s that “free market” for ya, subsidized by our tax dollars. Think Progress’ Wonk Room has more on the NLRB’s complaint — Gov. Haley Defends Boeing’s Union-Busting: ‘It’s Called Capitalism’ : The National Labor Relations Board last week filed a complaint against the airplane manufacturer Boeing, noting that, according to public pronouncements by the company’s officials, the construction of a new plant in South Carolina was intended as retribution against workers in Washington who have engaged in a pair of strikes over the last six years. One senior Boeing official, for instance, said during an interview, “The overriding factor [in moving to South Carolina] was not the business climate. And it was not the wages we’re paying today. It was that we cannot afford to have a work stoppage , you know, every three years.” Under national labor law, retaliating against workers for striking is illegal union-busting, but several Republican lawmakers have attacked the NLRB and the Obama administration for initiating the complaint. “This is nothing more than a political favor for the unions who are supporting President Obama’s re-election campaign,” said Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC). “The Obama administration is now dictating where companies are allowed to create new jobs,” wrote former Gov. Tim Pawlenty (R-MN). As the Washington Post’s Steve Pearlstein wrote, “given the public statements of Boeing officials, there is nothing radical about the NLRB’s decision”; the NLRB is simply trying to enforce worker protections that are already law. And, contrary to Haley’s pronouncement, the NLRB made clear that “The complaint does not seek closure of the South Carolina facility, nor does it prohibit Boeing from assembling planes there .” Haley also neglects to mention that South Carolina gave Boeing nearly $1 billion to open its plant in South Carolina (even as Boeing systemically dodges taxes ). Nor is this Haley’s first foray into union-busting; she named a union-busting attorney to head South Carolina’s Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation for the express purpose of preventing unions from trying to unionize Boeing’s South Carolina plant. Boeing donated to both Haley’s election campaign and her inaugural gala . The laws that the NLRB is seeking to enforce are necessary to ensure that corporations can’t threaten to move production and fire workers who exercise their right to organize. Haley’s view — and that of the rest of the Republicans attacking Obama and the NLRB — is that corporations should be allowed to ignore the law and workers’ rights if it will increase their profits.

Continue reading …
Anti-royals criticise police tactics

Republicans and others say they were held long enough to ensure they did not disrupt the celebrations – but not charged Activists have condemned a series of “pre-crime” arrests carried out by the Metropolitan police on the eve of the royal wedding as disturbing, Orwellian and of doubtful legality. Republican activists planning events almost a mile away from Westminster Abbey were held for up to 24 hours in police cells around the capital on Friday as tens of thousands turned out to watch the celebrations. Those arrested include 30-year-old stunt film-maker Charlie Veitch, who is part of the group Love Police . He was arrested at his home in Cambridge at 5pm on Thursday on the charge of “conspiracy to cause a public nuisance” and on suspicion of involvement in last month’s UK Uncut protest inside luxury retailer Fortnum and Mason . Chris Knight, a 68-year-old retired anthropology professor, his partner, Camilla Power and 45-year-old friend Patrick Macroidan were arrested on the eve of the wedding near their home in Brockley, south-east London, on the same charge. It is understood that Knight’s group, the Government of the Dead, was planning to behead an effigy of Prince Andrew with a theatrical guillotine in an act of street theatre on Soho Square in London. Plain clothes officers carried out “snatch and grab” arrests of activists on the square on Friday morning. A total of 55 people were arrested on Friday, not all in relation to republican activity. Nearly two dozen people were arrested on Thursday before most protests had taken place. Speaking after his release, Veitch said he had been planning to take his megaphone to Soho Square to protest about wedding expenditure in a time of austerity and had informed the Met about his actions in advance. Although described as a political anarchist, Veitch said he was not a “destructive or violent” person and believes that his arrest was sanctioned from high up in the Met. “I spent 16 hours in Parkside police station [in Cambridge] in a box-like cell. Then at 10am the next day, the Met police came to Cambridge and took me to Edmonton police station. “They never made anyone aware of where I was. To my family, it was like I had been disappeared for the entire duration of the royal wedding.” Veitch described the grounds for arrest as “Orwellian” and compared it to the film Minority Report, where people were arrested before they committed a crime. “I feel I was subject to a Minority Report style arrest, where I was being done for ‘pre-crime’. Along with the other arrests, this was like the great royal wedding purge of the masses, sent to the gulags to keep them out of the way,” he said. Adam Moniz, 30, said he was detained for six hours in Belgravia police station after stepping off his train from Southampton on Friday morning. Moniz, who says he is not a member of any political group and has never been arrested before, said that British Transport police questioned him on his train as it pulled out of Clapham Junction about a concealed banner he was carrying which read “Democracy not Monarchy”. Moniz told an officer that he was planning to attend the Not the Royal Wedding party, in Red Lion Square, Holborn and even offered to turn back to Southampton. He was told to continue with his journey but was detained by 10 officers when he arrived at Victoria station. “I like the [royal] couple and I’m happy for them; I was planning to protest against privilege. Instead I was held in a cell … and released without charge after the wedding was over. “I think what it said on my banner had some truth to it, and I think it was pretty outrageous to arrest me.” Solicitor Mike Schwarz, author of The Law of Public Order and Protest, said the arrests were part of a “growing trend”. “The police’s tactics are of deep concern to anyone interested in the right to protest and dissent. Pre-emptive action by the police is a growing trend and of doubtful legality,” said Schwarz. “It fits in with the pattern of increasing reliance on kettling and the excessive use of force at the protests such as those at the G20.” Royal wedding Monarchy Police London Shiv Malik guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
EU considers border controls return

Move follows calls by France and Italy to reinstate border checks after influx of thousands of migrants from north Africa The European Union executive is considering allowing member states to reinstate some border controls, its president has said, responding to demands for more national power to stem immigration. The announcement on Sunday lent momentum to a campaign by France and Italy to reimpose some of the border checks , abolished in 1995 under the Schengen agreement, as they grapple with an influx of migrants fleeing political upheaval in north Africa. In a letter to Italian prime minister Silvio Berlusconi and French president Nicolas Sarkozy, José Manuel Barroso, the president of the European Commission, said it would be possible to permit countries reintroduce limited controls. “The temporary restoration of borders is one of the possibilities, provided this is subject to specific and clearly defined criteria, that could be an element to strengthen the governance of the Schengen agreement,” Barroso wrote. EU countries may already introduce temporary border checks as Germany has done to stop foreign soccer hooligans visiting football games, but new EU rules could widen countries’ freedom to do so, said a source familiar with the plans. “To reinstate border controls now, you have to justify that based on the threat to public order,” said the source. “With the new system, you would no longer need to invoke a threat to public order. This would extend the possibilities to reinstate controls.” The EU executive, which writes the first draft of EU laws that are then sent to countries for approval, plans to present an outline of its legal proposals in the coming days. If accepted, the new EU rules would alter one of the biggest achievements of the single European market, passport-free travel, but one which makes it harder to curb illegal migration. The proposals could become law as soon as they are agreed by the EU’s 27 member states and the bloc’s parliament, a process that could be concluded in months but could also easily drag on for more than a year. The arrival of thousands of immigrants from north Africa prompted France in April to shut its borders to trains carrying African migrants from Italy. The two countries accused each other of flouting the spirit of the Schengen treaty, which eliminates many border controls within the EU. So far this year, around 25,000 migrants, most from France’s former colony Tunisia, have arrived in southern Italy on small, overloaded fishing boats, creating a humanitarian emergency on the tiny island of Lampedusa where most of the boats landed. Italy says it has been left to deal with the problem on its own while Paris has accused Rome of trying to escape its responsibilities by allowing illegal immigrants free transit across the border. Last Tuesday, Sarkozy visited Rome to try to defuse tension. European Union Europe France Italy Arab and Middle East unrest guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
President Obama Shares His Thoughts On GOP 2012 Contenders at White House Press Dinner

Click here to view this media President Obama had some opinions on the 2012 field of Republican candidates. I think my favorite was his message for Michele Bachmann. Michele Bachmann is here, though, I understand. And she is thinking about running for President, which is weird, because I heard she was born in Canada. [laughter] Yes Michele, this is how it starts. Tim Pawlenty: He seems all-American, but have you ever heard his real middle name? Tim Hosni Pawlenty? What a shame. Jon Huntsman: Now, there’s something you might not know about Jon. He didn’t learn to speak Chinese to go there. Oh, no. He learned English to come here. On Mitt Romney: There’s a vicious rumor floating around that I think could really hurt Mitt Romney. I heard he passed universal healthcare when he was Governor of Massachusetts. Someone should get to the bottom of that. And I know just the guy to do it. Donald Trump. The Donald Trump comments are about as funny and as withering as anyone could get without descending into the nasty zone. Watch those to see what I mean. As annoyingly insular as these events are — and they are — they’re also an opportunity for the President to use humor as a way of disarming ongoing and aggravating personal attacks with some humor and some class, which he really did quite nicely.

Continue reading …
Arsenal beat United to breathe new life into title race

Arsenal are very unlikely to win the Premier League this season, but this victory reinvigorates the contest for the title. Chelsea now stand only three points behind Manchester United and go to Old Trafford next weekend. The victors won with a goal from Aaron Ramsey, whose career has been disrupted by injury, but may have quaked near the end when Gaël Clichy’s studs made contact with the calf of the substitute Michael Owen. The referee Chris Foy took no action and was at least consistent here in his scepticism towards such appeals. Arsenal had their first win over these rivals in two years. It was a windy afternoon and other factors also made it difficult for players to show poise. United, as visitors, were naturally combative, with Anderson making his presence felt at the core of midfield. Arsenal, all the same, ought still to have been given the opportunity to open the scoring 12 minutes from the interval. Nemanja Vidic had his arm extended and made contact with a cross from Theo Walcott, but Foy took no action. The official was giving a minimalist performance and had declined to award a free-kick earlier when Vidic seemed to foul Jack Wilshere near the penalty area. Despite such incidents, the visitors usually looked sound. It was a hindrance to Arsenal that Cesc Fábregas missed the fixture with a thigh strain and Samir Nasri did not last beyond the interval because of a hamstring problem. Nonetheless, it was United who suffered. Sir Alex Ferguson must have anticipated taking command as they have done in the past at the Emirates and the Arsenal goalkeeper Wojciech Szczesny did make a good save from a Wayne Rooney free-kick soon after the interval. Even so, the opposition were beginning to impose a pattern in their build-up and took the lead after 56 minutes. Ramsey slipped a low ball from Wilshere into the corner of the net. This was merely a second start of the Arsenal league campaign for the scorer, who has also been on loan to Cardiff as he tries to re-establish his career following a broken leg. United, however, could be excused for lacking any glow of benevolence as they fell behind. Prior to the goal, the visitors had brought on Antonio Valencia, as if they expected to be on the attack. With Arsenal in front, adventure was obligatory but Arsène Wenger’s men coped well enough, with Szczesny blocking a shot from an angle by Nani. For the moment at least, there is an obstacle, too, in United’s path to the title. Premier League Arsenal Manchester United Kevin McCarra guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Arsenal beat United to breathe new life into title race

Arsenal are very unlikely to win the Premier League this season, but this victory reinvigorates the contest for the title. Chelsea now stand only three points behind Manchester United and go to Old Trafford next weekend. The victors won with a goal from Aaron Ramsey, whose career has been disrupted by injury, but may have quaked near the end when Gaël Clichy’s studs made contact with the calf of the substitute Michael Owen. The referee Chris Foy took no action and was at least consistent here in his scepticism towards such appeals. Arsenal had their first win over these rivals in two years. It was a windy afternoon and other factors also made it difficult for players to show poise. United, as visitors, were naturally combative, with Anderson making his presence felt at the core of midfield. Arsenal, all the same, ought still to have been given the opportunity to open the scoring 12 minutes from the interval. Nemanja Vidic had his arm extended and made contact with a cross from Theo Walcott, but Foy took no action. The official was giving a minimalist performance and had declined to award a free-kick earlier when Vidic seemed to foul Jack Wilshere near the penalty area. Despite such incidents, the visitors usually looked sound. It was a hindrance to Arsenal that Cesc Fábregas missed the fixture with a thigh strain and Samir Nasri did not last beyond the interval because of a hamstring problem. Nonetheless, it was United who suffered. Sir Alex Ferguson must have anticipated taking command as they have done in the past at the Emirates and the Arsenal goalkeeper Wojciech Szczesny did make a good save from a Wayne Rooney free-kick soon after the interval. Even so, the opposition were beginning to impose a pattern in their build-up and took the lead after 56 minutes. Ramsey slipped a low ball from Wilshere into the corner of the net. This was merely a second start of the Arsenal league campaign for the scorer, who has also been on loan to Cardiff as he tries to re-establish his career following a broken leg. United, however, could be excused for lacking any glow of benevolence as they fell behind. Prior to the goal, the visitors had brought on Antonio Valencia, as if they expected to be on the attack. With Arsenal in front, adventure was obligatory but Arsène Wenger’s men coped well enough, with Szczesny blocking a shot from an angle by Nani. For the moment at least, there is an obstacle, too, in United’s path to the title. Premier League Arsenal Manchester United Kevin McCarra guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Arsenal beat United to breathe new life into title race

Arsenal are very unlikely to win the Premier League this season, but this victory reinvigorates the contest for the title. Chelsea now stand only three points behind Manchester United and go to Old Trafford next weekend. The victors won with a goal from Aaron Ramsey, whose career has been disrupted by injury, but may have quaked near the end when Gaël Clichy’s studs made contact with the calf of the substitute Michael Owen. The referee Chris Foy took no action and was at least consistent here in his scepticism towards such appeals. Arsenal had their first win over these rivals in two years. It was a windy afternoon and other factors also made it difficult for players to show poise. United, as visitors, were naturally combative, with Anderson making his presence felt at the core of midfield. Arsenal, all the same, ought still to have been given the opportunity to open the scoring 12 minutes from the interval. Nemanja Vidic had his arm extended and made contact with a cross from Theo Walcott, but Foy took no action. The official was giving a minimalist performance and had declined to award a free-kick earlier when Vidic seemed to foul Jack Wilshere near the penalty area. Despite such incidents, the visitors usually looked sound. It was a hindrance to Arsenal that Cesc Fábregas missed the fixture with a thigh strain and Samir Nasri did not last beyond the interval because of a hamstring problem. Nonetheless, it was United who suffered. Sir Alex Ferguson must have anticipated taking command as they have done in the past at the Emirates and the Arsenal goalkeeper Wojciech Szczesny did make a good save from a Wayne Rooney free-kick soon after the interval. Even so, the opposition were beginning to impose a pattern in their build-up and took the lead after 56 minutes. Ramsey slipped a low ball from Wilshere into the corner of the net. This was merely a second start of the Arsenal league campaign for the scorer, who has also been on loan to Cardiff as he tries to re-establish his career following a broken leg. United, however, could be excused for lacking any glow of benevolence as they fell behind. Prior to the goal, the visitors had brought on Antonio Valencia, as if they expected to be on the attack. With Arsenal in front, adventure was obligatory but Arsène Wenger’s men coped well enough, with Szczesny blocking a shot from an angle by Nani. For the moment at least, there is an obstacle, too, in United’s path to the title. Premier League Arsenal Manchester United Kevin McCarra guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
May Day met with rallies and song

From Moscow to Manila, workers marched to demand better rights, but in Oxford, 18,000 turned out to hear hymns at dawn While most of Britain was still sleeping off its national royal wedding hangover – notwithstanding the 18,000 bleary-eyed people who managed to stagger out on to the streets of Oxford at dawn – traditional May Day celebrations, rallies and protests were held around the world. One of the biggest turnouts was in Istanbul, where an estimated 200,000 people marched to demand better rights and wages for Turkish workers. It was the largest workers’ rally to be held in the central Taksim Square since 34 people died in a stampede in 1977. Trade unions were barred from holding May Day rallies in the square until last year. In South Korea, police said 50,000 joined a rally in Seoul, demanding government measures against inflation and rising food prices. In Moscow, supporters of the prime minister, Vladimir Putin, and trade union members rallied, with marchers carrying banners calling for “dignified work” – though the speeches by city and trade union leaders were greeted by an egg thrown from the crowd. It missed the dignitaries and splattered harmlessly on the stage. In a scene to bring tears of nostalgia to a traditionalist’s eyes, around 3,000 Communist party members marched past the Kremlin, brandishing red flags and carrying portraits of Lenin and Stalin. Workers also marched in Taiwan, Hong Kong, and in Manila in the Philippines, where an effigy of President Benigno Aquino III – complete with his luxury car, a second-hand Porsche that he was bitterly criticised for buying this year – was burned. Some marchers headed towards the presidential palace, but found their way barred by barbed wire and armed riot police. Aquino had earlier held a breakfast meeting at the palace with more moderate labour leaders. In Britain, Brighton got its May Day celebrations in early, with an anti-capitalist rally on Saturday afternoon which the organisers claimed brought together members of “Brighton Anarchist Black Cross, Smash EDO , Squatter Networks of Brighton and Brighton Hunt Saboteurs”, to “stand up for workers’ rights and resist oppression”. There were eight arrests, among around 200 demonstrators. Oxford has held May Day celebrations since at least the 17th century, with choristers in the tower of Magdalen College singing to greet the dawn. In previous years revellers have jumped from the nearby bridge into the river, leading to so many injuries that police closed it off for several years. The bridge was open again this year but the water level was so low, after months of drought, that only a few hardy souls went in, swimming from the bank instead. In an echo of the Puritans abolishing Christmas, the government has threatened to abolish May Day entirely, replacing it with a new autumn bank holiday. Morris dancers, Jacks in the Green and hobby horses gnashed their coconuts and tinkled their bells in protest over the proposal outside parliament last month. May Day Protest Turkey South Korea Russia Philippines Maev Kennedy guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …