Royal couple’s three-day trip in July will be first official visit to US by Prince William and follows tour of Canada The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge will visit California this summer after their tour of Canada, St James’s Palace has said. The newly-married couple will travel to the west coast state from 8-10 July. It will be Prince William’s first official visit to the US as well as the first time that the duchess has been to the country. The prince returned to his job as an RAF search-and-rescue helicopter pilot this week after the couple’s wedding at Westminster Abbey last Friday. For the time being the newlyweds have postponed their honeymoon, the destination of which is being kept secret. They will begin their first official overseas trip as a married couple by touring Canada from 30 June to 8 July, including visits to Alberta, the Northwest Territories, Prince Edward Island and Quebec. St James’s Palace said a detailed itinerary for the California visit would be published at a later date. Prince William Monarchy Kate Middleton Royal wedding California United States Canada guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …General Medical Council looks into findings which were criticised by other pathologists at Ian Tomlinson inquest The General Medical Council is investigating the suspended pathologist Dr Freddy Patel for the way he conducted a postmortem examination on Ian Tomlinson. Patel carried out the first autopsy on the body, suggesting that the newspaper seller had died of a heart attack during the G20 demonstrations in London on 1 April 2009. His findings were criticised by three other pathologists who subsequently conducted examinations of Tomlinson and concluded that the 47-year-old father of nine had died from internal bleeding. An inquest jury returned a verdict of unlawful killing on Tuesday after seeing a video showing a police officer pushing Tomlinson who fell forward on to the pavement in the City of London. It is understood that the GMC has begun its inquiries into Patel’s performance during his controversial autopsy. The disciplinary panel has also been approached by other families who are pressing for inquiries into Patel’s role as a pathologist in other deaths. The families of those affected have begun banding together to raise concerns about the way postmortems have been conducted. Among those who have been in correspondence with the GMC are the relatives of Richard Chang, who died in 2004 after a fall inside the atrium of a London finance office. Patel conducted the postmortem examination. The courtroom-style hearings at the GMC’s high-rise offices on London’s Euston Road must, by now, be a painfully familiar ritual to Patel: the 63-year-old pathologist has been disciplined three times in the past decade and is serving his second term of suspension from the profession. At the end of the last examination, counsel for the GMC urged that he be struck off the medical register. Patel has had a chequered career. In 2002, he was found to have breached patient confidentiality by telling journalists that Roger Sylvester, a 30-year-old who died after being restrained by police, had been taking drugs. The GMC issued him with a reprimand. Last summer, Patel appeared before a fitness-to-practice panel to face charges that four of his postmortems were “not of a standard expected of a Home Office-registered forensic pathologist” and that one case “was liable to bring the profession into disrepute”. One of his postmortems was on a five-year-old girl who had been admitted to hospital after her parents claimed she had suffered a serious fall. Patel failed to spot signs of abuse and was suspended from practice for three months. The publicity generated by the Tomlinson case has stirred up several allegations against Patel. Between December last year and March this year, Patel was called by the GMC to answer fresh allegations of incompetence and dishonesty. He was found to have falsified his CV and to have conducted a botched autopsy on the body of 31-year-old sex worker Sally White, who was the first victim of the “Camden Ripper” Anthony Hardy. Patel suggested she had died from a heart attack during consensual sex despite evidence of blood-stained clothing and bedding. His findings discouraged police from launching a murder investigation. Hardy went on to murder two more women. In March, the GMC suspended Patel for a further four months. On Patel’s status, a spokeswoman said: “The GMC argued very strongly for erasure [striking off the register] but we have independent panels and they went with suspension. It’s frustrating for the GMC.” The GMC says it cannot confirm whether it is investigating the Chang family’s complaint. Chang, 48, was found dead on 13 July 2004 on the ground floor of Abbey National’s office. He was a risk analyst and had been working on corporate governance. He had fallen from a fifth-floor internal balcony shortly after being interviewed by a private investigation company about accusations of sending malicious, anonymous documents to the Financial Services Authority. The inquest returned a verdict of suicide. His family has never accepted the official version of events and has challenged the thoroughness of the postmortem conducted by Patel, questioning whether he examined certain marks on the body. Lawyers for Patel were passed the complaints from the Chang family but did not respond. Dr Freddy Patel Ian Tomlinson Owen Bowcott Paul Lewis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …New York Times reports US navy Seals killed sole gunman at start of raid, while Pakistan angrily defends its record on terror Further doubts have emerged about the official US account of the raid in which Osama bin Laden was killed, with reports saying US navy Seals were fired on only at the very beginning of the operation and that four of the five people who died, including the al-Qaida leader, were not armed. Meanwhile Pakistan’s foreign secretary has widened his country’s rift with the US over the unilateral American operation by suggesting it could have violated guarantees in the UN charter over national sovereignty. Unnamed US officials told the New York Times that the only shots fired from within the compound in Abbottabad where Bin Laden was sheltering came from his courier Abu Ahmed al-Kuwaiti, who was behind the door of a guesthouse adjacent to the main house. The US raiding party shot and killed Kuwaiti and a woman in the guesthouse, and on entering the main house were not fired on again, the officials said. This is a markedly different version of events to that released by the Pentagon, which said the US forces were “engaged in a firefight throughout the operation”. Separately, MSNBC news reported that four of the five people killed during the operation were unarmed at the time and did not fire a shot. However, the New York Times quoted officials as saying the Seals were in a “threatening and hostile environment” and believed throughout that they were under threat. The next person shot, the courier’s brother, was killed after they believed he was preparing to fire a weapon, while Bin Laden’s son Khalid died as he lunged towards the Seal team. When Bin Laden was shot in a room on the top floor of the house he was not armed but had an AK-47 assault rifle and a Makarov pistol within reach, the paper said. After the building was secured the team seized about 100 USB drives, DVDs, computer disks, five computers and 10 hard drives, the paper added. The continuing disputes about precisely what happened during the raid have threatened to take some of the gloss off what is otherwise viewed as a triumph for Barack Obama and his administration. The White House has already put out a series of corrections to its initial account . The fact it was carried out without any prior warning to Pakistan’s government or military, for fear of leaks, has angered ministers in Islamabad. “There are legal questions that arise in terms of the UN charter,” Salman Bashir told a press conference in Islamabad, apparently referring to sections of the document, and subsequent UN resolutions, guaranteeing national sovereignty. While the US remained a “friend and important partner”, Bashir said, “any other country that would ever act on the assumption that it has the might, and mimic unilateralism of any sorts, will find, at least as far as Pakistan is concerned, that it has made a basic miscalculation”. Bashir dismissed criticism of his country’s intelligence service, the ISI, widely seen in Washington as, at best, not fully committed to tackling al-Qaida. The fact that Bin Laden had been able to evade capture for so long was “a global intelligence failure”, Bashir said, adding: “The ISI has done invaluable work, it has a brilliant track record in combating terror.” Such questions will matter little in New York on Thursday when Obama visits Ground Zero, the site of al-Qaida’s 2001 attacks. During his first visit to the site as president he plans to lay a wreath and meet the families of some of the victims. “He wants to meet with them and share with them this important and significant moment, a bittersweet moment,” Carney said. Obama said on Wednesday night that he had blocked the publication of gruesome pictures of Osama bin Laden’s corpse, telling CBS: “It is important for us to make sure that very graphic photos of somebody who was shot in the head are not floating around as an incitement to additional violence.” Releasing the pictures would not silence doubters and would be gratuitous, he said. “That’s not who we are. You know, we don’t trot out this stuff as trophies.” America’s discovery of Bin Laden sheltering in an affluent town near Pakistan’s capital, Islamabad, rather than scurrying around various hiding places in the lawless tribal land near the Afghan border as long presumed, has not helped relations between the countries. Some US politicians have suggested Washington should cut off billions of dollars in aid. Pakistan has in turn been angered at not being warned of the raid, with intelligence officers saying they would probably refuse any US requests to speak to Bin Laden family members arrested at the compound. The country’s most influential Islamist party, Jamaat-e-Islami, has called for rallies on Friday to demand Pakistan’s government withdraw support from US operations targeting al-Qaida and other militants. “Even if there was any sympathy for the Americans, that would dissipate after the way they crushed and violated our sovereignty and our independence,” the party’s leader, Syed Munawar Hasan, told Reuters. Across the border in Afghanistan, a crowd of around 10,000 people rallied in Kabul against the Taliban. A speech by former Afghan intelligence chief Amrullah Saleh was continually interrupted by chants of “Death to the Punjabis” and “Death to the Taliban”. Osama bin Laden United States US military New York Times Barack Obama Obama administration Ground Zero Peter Walker Haroon Siddique guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Slate's media reporter Jack Shafer has a great column up calling on the White House to release the apparently-gruesome photos of Osama bin Laden after he was shot and killed by Navy SEALs on Sunday. Suppressing the photos, Shafer claims, “infantilizes the nation and gives the White House unwarranted news control.” Check out a longer excerpt below the break. In a world where every form of splatter, dismemberment, and slaughter has found a home on the Web—a place in which tens, perhaps hundreds, of millions have watched blood bubble out of Neda Salehi Agha Sotan's face and pool on the asphalt beneath her head—it seems nuts that President Barack Obama has decided not to release the photos of Osama Bin Laden's bullet-dented cranium… Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., the chairman of the House Intelligence panel, opposes making the photos public for similar reasons, saying he doesn't want the images to “make the job of our troops serving in places like Iraq and Afghanistan any harder than it already is. The risks of release outweigh the benefits.” Obama and Rogers' idea that news should be calibrated by the government to ease the job of the U.S. military makes for a First Amendment loophole you could drive a motorized regiment through. If al-Qaida and its supporters are more irate with the United States this week than they were last week, it's because U.S. commandos killed Bin Laden. Obama should never have marked him for death if tending the “sensitivities” of al-Qaida and its allies was U.S. policy. It's hard to imagine that a death photo of Bin Laden would elevate al-Qaida and its supporters to some fury that his killing didn't. Or, as @knifework tweeted this afternoon, “Who hasn't shot someone in the face, fed their corpse to the sharks, and then fretted over how their followers would feel about the photo?” Thoughts on Shafer's argument? On the White House's decision generally?
Continue reading …Everyone from Facebook to Ken Livingstone is using the internet to direct marketing at individuals Ever get the feeling you’re being followed? I did when I got an email from “Matthew Gale”, co-curator of the Joan Miró exhibition at Tate Modern last week, less than 24 hours after seeing the show. “I’m so pleased you visited,” he said. “From what I’ve read on Tate’s blog, people appear to be relating to Miró’s work in a deeply personal way.” I’ll tell you what I am relating to in a deeply personal way, “Matthew Gale”: being stalked electronically. “Matthew Gale” is not the only piece of software stalking me. I’m also in communication with “Ken Livingstone” and “Ed Miliband”. “Ed” sends me rousing emails insisting that I do something about the government. I confess I have been a bit remiss about that. After March’s budget he wrote to me: “We’re left with a chancellor claiming to deliver a budget for growth – while downgrading the growth forecast. You and I know it’s not the wrong type of snow that’s to blame, it’s the wrong type of chancellor. Get involved.” “Ken” has thanked me for all I am doing (think nothing of it, Ken), but he’d like me to do more: “I’ve launched a new campaign #getagripboris calling on the mayor to sort out the transport crisis in London. Click here to sign the petition,” he urged in a “personal” email to me a couple of weeks ago. Meanwhile Facebook is watching my every move, telling me today – seconds after I made a brief visit to the site for the purpose of research – “Welcome back to Facebook!” (I am NEVER coming back, Facebook) and a few days earlier: “You haven’t been back to Facebook recently.” Have I brought this unwelcome electronic attention on myself? Well, yes: in the sense that, when I signed up for membership of these things, I accepted the privacy policies that went along with them. “Cookies” and similar devices are used to make online interaction more efficient – and to direct marketing and advertising at individual users. Without them, the ability of the internet to function smoothly would be impeded. Cookies are files put on to our computers by websites so that they can remember things about us, such as our browsing habits and payment details when we transact online. They are not illegal. However, the Data Protection Act provides that websites should not process “excessive” personal data, and guidance from the information commissioner’s office (ICO) says that organisations collecting data should consider the extent to which that data can be processed anonymously. Later this month a new law amending the EU’s privacy and electronic communications directive will come into force, which will require organisations to obtain consent from visitors to their websites before using cookies. However, the directive doesn’t require that user consent is obtained if the cookie is “strictly necessary” in order for the website to provide the service requested. The government has confirmed, in its response to consultations on the implementation of the directive, that it regards, for example, the use of cookies in online shopping baskets as “strictly necessary”. The government is talking to the industry about enhanced browser settings to harvest consent in other cases and about the use of cookies in behavioural advertising, but that work will not be completed before the 25 May deadline for implementing the directive. In the meantime, the ICO is not expected to take enforcement action where websites are “working to address their use of cookies or are engaged in development work on browsers and/or other solutions”. The directive does not apply to Facebook, a US company, and it is not clear whether it would apply to the sort of communication I received from the Tate. I can, in theory, unsubscribe to emails (the Tate was unable to process my request today). That would solve the “Ed” and “Ken” problem, but it wouldn’t stop Tate and Facebook snooping on me, because the Faustian contractual pact to which I signed up lets them do it. Internet Facebook Social networking Siobhain Butterworth guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Stuart Heritage talks to Robert Pattinson, Reese Witherspoon and Christoph Waltz to hear about Francis Lawrence’s Depression-era love story set in a travelling circus Stuart Heritage Henry Barnes
Continue reading …Activist group denies link with theft of up to 100m personal and credit card details, saying its aims are political The online activism group Anonymous has denied insinuations by Sony that it was involved in the hacker breaches of the PlayStation Network (PSN) and Online Entertainment (SOE) systems in which between 77m and 100m personal details were stolen, and potentially as many credit card details. The riposte was delivered in a letter published online soon after the corporation delivered a letter to US politicians in which it claimed that private investigators called in to examine the break-in had discovered a file entitled “Anonymous” and containing the words “We are Legion” – part of Anonymous’s slogan. The group issued a 900-word statement in which it insisted that it does not steal credit card data and that its aims are purely political – in marked contrast, it said, to its adversaries, who include Sony because of the action the company took against a number of users who had found ways around some protections built into the PlayStation 3 console. “Anonymous has never been known to have engaged in credit card theft,” the statement said. “Many of our corporate and governmental adversaries, on the other hand. have been known to have lied to the public about Anonymous and about their own activities.” It said that the credit card theft – which Sony said came about after four servers on its network spontaneously rebooted and began behaving “oddly” – did not fit Anonymous’s “modus operandi”: “Whoever did perform the credit card theft did so contrary to the ‘modus operandi’ and intentions of Anonymous. Public support is not gained by stealing credit card info and personal identities, we are trying to fight criminal activities by corporations and governments, not steal credit cards.” Anonymous is a loosely organised group of hackers of various levels of expertise with an onion-like structure, where the most experienced and skilled hackers work in the centre, widening to the less experienced but sympathetic “members” at the fringes. They organise themselves through online chatrooms; few members know each others’ real-life identities. Membership is international and probably includes a couple of thousand people at any time. In the past the group has targeted the Church of Scientology, Visa and Mastercard, and various middle Eastern governments in the pursuit of what it sees as transparency and individual liberty. Sony has also blamed Anonymous for carrying out a denial-of-service attack which made it difficult or impossible to spot the break-in because Sony’s engineers were trying to cope with the online attack that was knocking out their servers. The statement from Anonymous – which appears to have been authored by a number of people, but uses American spelling and grammar throughout – does not deal with the ramifications of the attack, and Sony’s assertion that it enabled the theft by distracting the security team. The timing of the break-in to Sony’s systems is unlikely to have been an accident; a malicious hacker could have used the attack by Anonymous as cover when the first break-in on 17 April was made. Anonymous had announced on 4 APril that it would attack Sony because the Japanese corporation decided to pursue legal action against George Hotz, who had discovered and then shared the “root key” of the PS3, which would mean that anyone could potentially play any game on it – including pirated ones. Anonymous insisted: “If a legitimate and honest investigation into the credit card is conducted, Anonymous will not be found liable. While we are a distributed and decentralized group, our ‘leadership’ does not condone credit card theft. We are concerned with erosion of privacy and fair use, the spread of corporate feudalism, the abuse of power and the justifications of executives and leaders who believe themselves immune personally and financially for the actions they undertake in the name of corporations and public office.” The fact that Sony has said that the people who hacked its servers erased log files to cover their steps makes it look extremely unlikely that they would also have left a text file linking them back to Anonymous if that were their origin. Anonymous Sony Hacking Data and computer security Charles Arthur guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Rolling coverage as voters go to the polls in elections for local government, the devolved administrations and the AV referendum 1.56pm: Time for a lunchtime summary , which is going to be short because it has been a quiet morning: • The former home secretary David Blunkett, who is opposed to AV, has said that the £250m figure cited by the the no camp as the cost of replacing first past the post with the alternative vote has been “made up” . (see 10.35am ). Blunkett said he believed it would “undoubtedly cost more”, but put the figure at £90m. • A Guardian/ICM poll predicts a resounding victory for first past the post in the referendum . The survey, conducted before the referendum, on whether to introduce the alternative vote for elections to the Commons predicts a 68% no vote with only 32% for yes. A YouGov poll for the Sun suggests 60% support for the no campaign, a 20-point lead over those in favour. But a poll by Metro shows a swing the other way, with those polled backing AV by 47% to 43%. (see 8.55am ) • The three main party leaders have all cast their votes (see 11.50am ), ( 9.59am ) and ( 9.37am ). On other fronts: • The foreign secretary, William Hague, has ordered the expulsion of a further two Libyan diplomats from the Libyan embassy in London “on the basis that their activities were contrary to the interests of the UK” . Foreign ministers are meeting in Rome to discuss plans to fund the Libyan rebels. The US has pledged to provide $25m for “non-lethal” aid. • On Syria, Alistair Burt, the foreign office minister, told Sky news sanctions against senior individuals in the Syrian regime were being considered, but added that “it’s still not too late for Syria to turn back” . Hillary Clinton has given her backing to EU sanctions against Syria. Matt Weaver is liveblogging all the latest on Libya, Syria and the Middle East unrest. http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/blog/2011/may/05/libya-syria-middle-east-unrest-live The liveblog will resume shortly. 1.06pm: Dear Salopred – yes, London is the only region without elections other than the AV referendum (the London borough elections were last year and the mayoral and London assembly elections will be in 2012). The Lane ward poll in Peckham mentioned by supermole is a byelection for a councillor who recently stood down . 12.39pm: The Political and Constitutional Reform committee has called Nick Clegg to give evidence next Thursday on political and constitutional reform in the aftermath of AV referendum result. Clegg leads on constitutional reform in his role as deputy prime minister, and the session is part of the general scrutiny of the government’s reform programme. A press notice from the select committee, chaired by the Labour MP Graham Allen (who, incidentally, is in the yes camp for a switch to AV) states: The session is likely to focus in particular on the government’s immediate priorities, including the aftermath of the result of the referendum on the alternative vote and reform of the House of Lords, as well as the workings of coalition government. Should be interesting. 12.29pm: The FT’s Jim Pickard blogs that, contrary to some people’s expectations, a number of senior Lib Dems will be at the referendum count on Friday. They will include the former party leaders Lord Ashdown and Charles Kennedy, and the deputy leader, Simon Hughes. The UK results will be announced at the Excel Centre, in Docklands, London. Counting officers in 440 local voting areas will begin counting votes at 4pm on Friday. They will feed their local totals into one of 12 regional hubs across the UK, and the chief counting officer (Jenny Watson, from the electoral commission) will announce the regional totals as and when they come in before the final UK-wide result is declared. 11.53am: Our Ireland correspondent, Henry McDonald, has sent us this: Voters in Northern Ireland will have three ballot papers to fill in today as the province goes to the polls for elections to the assembly and local district councils. They will get a white paper for their choice of assembly candidates and a brown one for the council elections. On both of these, Northern Irish voters will vote by proportional representation with 1 as their first preference candidate, 2 their second preferred choice and so on. A third, light grey paper will be handed to each voter for the UK-wide AV referendum on electoral reform, where the vote will be cast with a simple X beside yes or no. The assembly poll will elect 108 new members to Stormont, while 582 council seats are being contested. More than 1,200,000 people are registered to vote in Northern Ireland. Polling stations opened at 7am and close at 10pm. Meanwhile, a senior police officer in the province said there will be an increased security presence due to the continued threat from republican dissidents. Deputy Chief Constable Judith Gillespie said this was to ensure there was no interference in the electoral process. 11.50am: David Cameron arrived in the rain (it’s more like drizzle) earlier to cast his referendum vote at the Methodist Central Hall in Westminster before strolling off towards Downing Street, according to PA. The media tried to ask him about the impact the result may have on the coalition, but they did so in vain. 11.32am: My colleague Jon Dennis noticed the warning on his polling card, which said: “You cannot be issued with a ballot paper after 10pm, even if you are at the polling station before then.” You may remember the outcry at last year’s general election when many people were disenfranchised because they had still been in queues at 10pm. The Electoral Commission says it unsuccessfully lobbied the government to put a clause in the parliamentary voting system and constituencies bill, now an Act, to ensure those still in a queue by 10pm could still vote if they had a ballot paper in their hand at the deadline point (for example, polling staff could hand out the ballot papers down the queue). So they issued guidance to chief returning officers to print the advice that Jon noticed on his polling card. The Electoral Commission has power of direction over the referendum, as opposed to the local elections. So to ensure everyone gets their say in the national poll, they instructed chief counting officers to have more polling stations (with 2,500 voters allocated to each), which should reduce the queues. (The Electoral Commission recommends this quota of voters for each station as good practice for other elections too). The cost of the referendum has been put at £81m, similar to the cost of a general election. The electorate for the referendum is around 46 million, according to the electoral watchdog. This is based on the latest available figures for registered and eligible voters in Britain (December 2010). 10.35am: Back to one of the central claims made by the no campaign about what having AV would cost. (see 9.37am ) David Blunkett, a vocal proponent of retaining first past the post, has claimed that the £250m figure cited by the no camp has been made up, according to the Times (paywall) Blunkett is quoted as saying: We are in the middle of an election campaign. People in elections use made-up figures. I have never used the £250m figure. It [AV] would undoubtedly cost more, but I have used an extra £90m. 10.27am: I seem to have confused readers in my opening post (I have amended it so that readers don’t have to get to this post to get clarity). But for those who have already read this far, I referred to STV for Scotland elections, which is actually used for the locals, not the devolved elections. Thanks, babytiger , for pointing it out. The devolved elections in Scotland are based on the mixed-member proportional representation system, ie first past the post system by constituency, with an additional member top-up by region. 9.59am: Nick Clegg voted in the Stannington area of Sheffield just after 9am. He wished the “best of luck” to Liberal Democrat candidates standing for town hall election, and urged people to come out and vote yes in the referendum to to make politics “a bit better and a bit fairer”. Here are some lines, courtesy of Press Association: Asked about the reaction on the doorstep, he said: ‘Good. Lots of people have got, obviously, questions and some people have got objections to what the government is having to do. ‘But I think most people – the vast majority of people – accept that we’re having to do a difficult job in difficult circumstances and that we’re trying do it as fairly and compassionately and responsibly as possible.’ Ed Miliband has already voted in both the Doncaster council election and the AV referendum via a postal vote. But he accompanied his fiancee, Justine Thornton, to a polling station in north London to cast her vote. The couple spent about 10 minutes at Parliament Hill school, not far from their London home, where they greeted supporters before leaving on foot. 9.37am: David Cameron has taken a slot in the Conservative-supporting Sun to focus on the AV referendum . Three-quarters of the page is devoted to a graphic with Cameron on the left, and a sombre looking Winston Churchill on the right, with “vote no to save our democracy” emblazoned above and a standfirst that reads: “Do your duty today.” Cameron urges everyone to come out and vote to avoid Britain being landed with AV: Today is a big day for our country. The AV referendum is on and our democracy is on the line. Unless enough people get out and vote today, Britain is going to end up tomorrow with a new voting system that is unfair, unclear and unpopular around the world. I’ll let the last word go to Winston Churchill. Many years ago, he described AV as ‘the stupidest, the least scientific and the most unreal’ voting system. Among the five “important reasons” cited by Cameron for voting no is the oft-repeated claim by the no camp that AV would cost a fortune, wasting money that the prime minister said could be “far better spent in our schools and hospitals”. The referendum, agreed by both the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats, is costing an estimated £80m, whatever happens. But the rest of the £247m quoted by the no camp is based on the predicted need to buy counting machines and/or pay the fees of vote counters with more work to do. The energy secretary, Chris Huhne, has threatened legal action over this argument, saying Australia – which uses the system – didn’t need to bring in new machines. The former Labour home secretary David Blunkett chips in his support for retaining first past the post. He lays out his arguments before concluding: I don’t think people should vote on personalities to defeat a particular party or a particular leader. I think people should vote because they want to retain one person one equal vote. Ed Miliband has urged voters not to use their referendum vote to give Nick Clegg “a kicking” because of his role in coalition government, but Blunkett’s comment makes one wonder whether the Conservatives are worried that those disgruntled with them will be voting yes for the same reasons. We shall soon see. 9.36am: Still in the Mirror, the paper has seized on a comment made by the Labour leader’s older brother, David, who has apparently described David Cameron as the “Basil Fawlty” of British politics. The Labour-supporting Mirror has obliged with a mock-up of Cameron with Manuel, Fawlty’s unappreciated waiter in the vintage British comedy. 9.21am: Ed Miliband, the Labour leader, tells the Daily Mirror that the local and devolved elections are voters’ opportunity to put “maximum pressure” on the government. His campaigning pitch has been to urge voters to send a message to the coalition about their anger at introducing policies for it has “no mandate”, such as NHS reorganisation. Miliband, who has been out campaigning in favour of the alternative vote, has tried to put the focus on significant Labour gains at the local elections. The Labour leader, who is on the same side of the fence as the Lib Dems on the referendum, has nevertheless seized on tensions within cabinet on the issue. What I’m interested in is what people want, and top of the list of voters’ concerns are the NHS, tuition fees and the cuts. And they will be asking why the Lib Dems are so hot under the collar about AV but don’t seem so hot under the collar about all these other issues. I think there is coalition land, a parallel universe where they are having this argument. And then there is the public, who are in a different place who are saying they don’t like these unseemly rows, it’s a bad way to run a government, and what we like even less is some of the policies they are pursuing, and that’s what Thursday is all about. Miliband, who took a question-and-answer session at Northfleet School for Girls in Kent yesterday as well as rallying his party, added: There’s a real sense this government doesn’t understand people and doesn’t understand people’s lives. They don’t understand the impacts they are having. They are profoundly out of touch with families struggling to get by and who are losing their tax credits, with the people losing their jobs, and who aren’t seeing the private sector jobs being created and youth unemployment with one in five people out of work. And what are they doing about it? Very little. 8.55am: Good morning. Have you been out to vote yet? (assuming you’re eligible and registered). Polls opened at 7am and close at 10pm, for those of you who didn’t opt for postal voting. Elections for the Scottish parliament, the Welsh assembly and the Northern Ireland assembly are being held, as are polls for 279 English councils. There are also local authority elections in Northern Ireland, a UK parliamentary byelection in Leicester South and mayoral elections in Leicester, Mansfield, Middlesbrough, Torbay and Bedford. The fact that so many of the British electorate have polls going on in their backyard was the reason the Liberal Democrats wanted the referendum on whether to switch the electoral system for electing MPs to Westminster from first past the post to the alternative vote to be held today. The only region without local polls is London, raising fears that turnout in the capital for the referendum could be as low as 15%. The BBC has produced a useful timeline of events once polls close . In sum, while we can expect a few local election results before midnight (Sunderland always prides itself on being first to declare, whether it’s a general or local election), the counting process for elections is going to stretch beyond Friday because not everyone is going to start counting tonight and also because some counts take more time than others. The final Northern Ireland assembly election results are not expected to be known until late Saturday afternoon. But we will know the result of the poll everyone’s been talking about – the national referendum – by around 9-10pm tomorrow. The count, everywhere, will begin at 4pm tomorrow, thought turnout should be known by lunchtime. The issue that has caused so much tension in the coalition government and seen the Labour party split between the yes and no camps looks likely to be resolved in favour of the status quo, according to a Guardian/ICM poll . The survey predicts a 68% no vote, with just 32% for yes. A YouGov poll for the Sun suggests 60% support for the no campaign, a 20-point lead over those in favour. But a poll by Metro shows a swing the other way, with those polled backing AV by 47% to 43%. Alternative vote AV referendum Scottish elections 2011 Welsh elections 2011 Welsh Assembly Government Welsh politics Scottish politics Local elections Local elections 2011 Northern Ireland elections 2011 Northern Irish politics Elections 2011 Hélène Mulholland guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ) pleaded with lawmakers Wednesday to support his anti-abortion legislation. “Someday I truly believe future generations of Americans will look back on us, especially policymakers, and wonder how and why such a rich and seemingly enlightened society, so blessed and endowed with the capacity to protect vulnerable human life could have insisted and instead aggressively promoted death to children and the exploitation of their moms,” he said in a speech on the House floor. “They will note with deep sadness, some of our politicians, while they talked about human rights, never lifted a finger to protect the most persecuted minority in the world: the child in the womb.” “Back and vote for H.R. 3, ‘The No Taxpayer Money for Abortion Act,’” he concluded.
Continue reading …