The president has good reason to be thankful to the assault team – the raid has silenced his critics and reshaped his image Barack Obama flew to Fort Campbell on the Kentucky-Tennessee border on Friday to thank in person the assault team who stormed Osama bin Laden’s hideout. He has good reason to do so: the raid has transformed the way Americans view their president, changing him overnight from dithering nerd-in-chief to decisive action man. At emotional meetings, held behind closed doors to protect their anonymity, he awarded the units involved the highest honours available to him and heard their first-hand accounts of what happened inside the Abbottabad compound. Afterwards, at an open meeting at the base with other troops, there were cheers when Obama spoke of these “quiet professionals” who had ensured that the terrorist behind the 9/11 attacks “will never threaten America again”. He had told them: “Job well done.” The president spoke to a hangar full of cheering soldiers after meeting privately with the full assault team, army helicopter pilots and navy seal commandos who executed the dangerous raid on Bin Laden’s compound and killed the al-Qaida leader in Pakistan early on Monday. “Thanks to the incredible skill and courage of countless individuals … the terrorist leader that struck our nation on 9/11 will never threaten America again,” Obama said, speaking at an army post whose troops have sustained heavy losses in a war in Afghanistan, losses that have grown on his watch. A US official said that material retrieved from Bin Laden’s compound shows he was in touch with senior al-Qaida figures and was able to plot future attacks on US targets from his suburban Pakistani hideout. The official said the trove of documents and computer material also includes new video of Bin Laden, both unreleased propaganda tapes and more candid shots like home videos. Obama owes a large debt to the special forces. Since he began campaigning for the presidency in 2007, he has faced criticism that he was not up to the job. First, the Hillary Clinton campaign implied that he was too inexperienced, that he could not handle the 3am crisis call. More followed from John McCain and Sarah Palin. Then came the rightwing commentators Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck and the Tea Party movement. He was too detached, too academic. His patriotism was questioned as was his religion. Stephen Hess, one of America’s most respected commentators on the White House, acknowledged Obama’s changed status since the death of Bin Laden. “His image, fair or unfair, is that he is an intellectual, which he is and which is unusual in a president. Obama thinks about things and takes his time in making decisions, which I think is a good thing.” But Hess, a political scientist at the Brookings Institution, saw the Abbottabad decision as “gutsy, tough, made quickly” and responsible for changing the dynamics of American politics. “It is going to be very hard for Republicans to use any more that label of weak and indecisive,” he said. Helping to reshape the image are those pictures of Obama in the situation room looking grave, grim and anxious as the raid is taking place. He was risking not only the special forces he had sent in but his own presidency, with the danger of a Jimmy Carter-style Iranian hostage rescue debacle that could have finished any hopes of a second White House term. Richard Wolffe, the author of two books on Obama, acknowledged that the perception had changed but insisted the view of the president as weak and naive was always wrong. “If he was as cautious as people said, he could have flattened the building with a bombing raid,” he said. “He makes a few big gambles, but cautiously. He will make the gutsy move, but gets there more slowly. It is a weird combination because we are used to someone who shoots from the hip like Bush or someone more hesitant like Kerry or Clinton. But we have someone who is a combination of the two, someone who is cautious but who makes the calls.” There is a hard core that will never be convinced that Obama is truly patriotic and will continue to insist he was not born in the US, that he is a secret Muslim. But their numbers have dwindled fast because of the combination of his release of his birth certificate a fortnight ago (and his ridiculing of Donald Trump at the White House correspondents’ dinner) and the Abbottabad raid. Beck, Limbaugh and former members of the Bush administration joined in the praise. David Frum, who as an assistant to Bush wrote the “axis of evil” speech, deplored the vilification of Obama as some dark-skinned alien. “So we had this situation where he was not an American, a Muslim, not a patriot. I do not think it [the Bin Laden killing] ends the paranoia but it shoves it back from the centre to the margins. He has shown he understands that the nation has enemies and that force is sometimes the only remedy,” Frum said. The White House and Pentagon almost threw away their advantage with its poor handling of the aftermath, offering exaggerated accounts of what happened and then having to recant. Obama’s meeting with the 9/11 relatives on Thursday and his trip to see the troops at Fort Campbell have undone some of that damage. Within minutes of Obama announcing last Sunday that Bin Laden was dead, US commentators were tweeting that the president had the 2012 election in the bag. That is grossly premature. Obama has not enjoyed the kind of spectacular jump in approval ratings that he might have expected. He has not soared into the 80s, instead seeing relatively modest rises that take him from the mid-40s to the mid-50s. That is mainly because of the sluggish economy. Democratic strategists, speaking anonymously, reluctant to sound negative in a week of good news for the president, are far from convinced he is invincible and are nervous about the slowness of the economic turnaround. Brad Coker, managing director of Mason-Dixon polling, agrees. “There is no reason for Democrats to say it is over. I think Republicans thought the same thing in 1991.” George Bush Sr had seen the Berlin Wall fall on his watch and had high approval ratings for his handling of the Gulf war, but still lost. “There is plenty of time for Obama’s shine to fade. Now you have all this stuff surrounding the release of these photos. Not wanting to put them out feeds into the old Obama image, not wanting to offend Muslims. We are a tabloid country. We want to see pictures of Bin Laden,” Coker said, predicting that Obama’s modest boost in the polls would last only a week before being halved. Obama came to power with some of the highest approval ratings in US political history. Millions turned out for his victory night party and inauguration. He has managed to get some of his programme through, delivering on his promise to introduce near-universal healthcare, due to begin in 2014. He has had other gains too, on gay rights, a US-Russian arms reduction deal and preventing the shutdown of government. But there is a lot left to do, including closing Guantánamo, reforming immigration laws and ending tax breaks for the wealthy. These failures have brought criticism from the left. Clarence Jones, a former lawyer and adviser to Martin Luther King, writes regular commentaries calling on the left to mobilise and press Obama to do more. While pleased that it went well in Abbottabad, he would like to see the president “apply the same careful, premeditated, calculating weighing of options about major domestic issues as he did in determining which course of action to pursue to get Bin Laden”. Jones, who helped draft King’s “I have a dream” speech, believes there was an undercurrent of racism behind many of the jibes about the president not being up to the job. “Yes, his academic professorial background was used by his critics to portray Obama as some ivory tower intellectual incapable of taking decisive action. Regrettably there was a racial undercurrent in the suggestions he was not up to the job.” Jones does not believe that the removal of Bin Laden has exorcised that. Politics will return to normal in Washington next week. The Republicans will resume their confrontation with the White House over the size of the national debt. Catching Bin Laden has given Obama an edge in those negotiations and an edge in the longer term. National security is usually a point of weakness for Democrats. But next year, if any Republican rival questions his credentials, the president will have an easy, one-word answer: “Osama”. Barack Obama Osama bin Laden United States US politics Ewen MacAskill guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …On Friday's Morning Edition, NPR reporter Don Gonyea reported on the first Republican presidential debate in South Carolina, and something curious was missing: any
Continue reading …• Official website confirms golfer died at 2.10am Saturday • Five-time major winner was 54 Seve Ballesteros, the legendary five-time major winning golfer, has died after losing his fight against cancer. The news was confirmed by a statement on the golfer’s official website which said: “Today, at 2.10am Spanish time, Seve Ballesteros passed away peacefully surrounded by his family at his home in Pedreña. “The Ballesteros family is very grateful for all the support and gestures of love that have been received since Seve was diagnosed with a brain tumour on 5th October 2008 at Madrid Hospital la Paz. “At this time the family asks for respect and privacy at such a painful time. Thank you very much. Ballesteros, 54, a five-time major winner, had been recuperating at his home in northern Spain after a series of operations since being diagnosed with two malignant brain tumours in 2008. His condition worsened on Wednesday, at which point he was admitted to hospital; rumours had swept Spain last week that Ballesteros’s situation had taken a rapid downturn. On Friday, Ballesteros was under heavy sedation, with his family and friends understood to be preparing for the worst. In an unfortunate coincidence, the Spanish Open – the last competition Ballesteros won as a professional in 1995 – is currently taking place in Barcelona. José María Olazábal, the golfer closest to Ballesteros and inspired by him since childhood, was too emotional to speak to the media in the aftermath of his Friday round in Barcelona. “I can’t talk,” Olazábal said. “I can only wait, and cry.” Another Spanish golfer and Olazábal’s playing partner, Miguel Angel Jiménez, was in tears upon completion of his second round. Olazábal, Europe’s Ryder Cup captain, recently stated his dream that Ballesteros could be alongside him for the meeting with the United States in Chicago next autumn. The pair met a fortnight ago, at which point Ballesteros was in a wheelchair. Olazábal’s manager, Sergio Gómez, reported that Ballesteros’s daughter had passed on details of her father’s condition on Thursday. “Seve’s physical condition was not good when José María went to see him, but they talked about golf and everything,” Gómez said. “Then came the call yesterday to tell him that Seve was in a critical condition.” Ballesteros’s illness initially came to light after he collapsed at Madrid airport in October 2008; during the intervening period, he has rarely been seen in public. Since his first surgery, which lasted 12 hours, he has undergone almost continuous chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In 2009, after his fourth chemotherapy course, Ballesteros labelled it “a miracle” he was still alive. In 2010, during his last television interview with the BBC, Ballesteros spoke of fighting cancer. “You can’t have it all in life,” he said. “One day you feel fantastic, the next you never know what is going to happen. You just take a look at how many days of glory I had before. It has been a fantastic life and this, what has happened to me, is what I will call destiny; one test that God is putting on me.” Ballesteros, who retired from professional golf in 2007, was earlier regarded as a pioneer for the European game overseas. He had turned professional at the age of 16, in 1974, finishing second to Jack Nicklaus in the Open at Birkdale only two years later. He was the first from this continent to claim a Masters title, in 1980, a feat he repeated at Augusta three years later. Ballesteros was the winner of the Open in 1979, 1984 and 1988. Besides winning a total of 87 titles in his career, Ballesteros played in eight Ryder Cups, claiming 20 points from 37 matches. He also captained a successful European team, fittingly on his home soil in Valderrama, 14 years ago. Ballesteros had not been deemed well enough to make a planned trip to St Andrews to say a farewell to British fans at the time of last year’s Open. At the Masters last month, Phil Mickelson dedicated a Spanish-themed champions’ dinner to the absent Ballesteros, the man he credits with his own decision to start playing golf. Seve Ballesteros Golf Ewan Murray guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …enlarge Credit: NASA Alan Shepard aboard Freedom 7 – a lot riding on it . Click here to view this media This day 50 years ago the Space Race heated up. Hot on the heels of the Soviet accomplishment, sending their first astronaut (Cosmonaut) Yuri Gagarin into space in April, America quickly followed suit by sending Alan Shepard , America’s first astronaut into space. Here is the sound of the launch from May 5, 1961 and the first Press Conference Shepard delivered on May 8th where he recapped the flight to an overflow crowd of reporters. A large page of history was made on this day and space became the biggest thing on peoples minds. . . .and if you don’t mind . .
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Well, we had the first Fox Republican debate in South Carolina this Thursday night and of course we then got treated to a Frank Luntz focus group segment for follow up. I don’t know about anyone else, but I got a kick out of watching Hannity try to make amends with the members of that focus group and apologize for the potential Republican primary candidates that dissed their state and primary voters and didn’t show up there. And who did the panel say they loved during the debate? Former Godfather’s Pizza CEO and “tea party” favorite Herman Cain. Tim Pawlenty can’t be thrilled that someone who was considered a B-list candidate showed him up tonight. The panel didn’t react very well to Romney deciding to bow out and to the Donald, who I never thought was a serious candidate in the first place, like Palin, and him needing to finish up his television series before he can participate in debates. It looks like the Republican primary race is off to a rocky start when Rupert Murdoch can’t even summon enough of them that are actually going to run to show up for one of his debates in what is extremely friendly territory to say the least. Here’s more on Luntz’s segment and their reaction to the debate — Focus group: Herman Cain clear winner in first GOP Presidential debate : If Frank Luntz’s South Carolina focus group had their way, businessman and talk show host Herman Cain would be America’s next President. Cain’s honesty and candid answers won over a large number of those present. One man said he worked for Mitt Romney in the 2008 election, but would now campaign for Cain. Others said they appreciated the fact Cain never held public office, and his answers were not those of a polished political operative. When asked about this in the debate, Cain said he “was proud” he had never held public office. He noted that most in Washington have held public office and asked, “how’s that working out for us?” Only one person went into the debate saying Cain was his first choice, but the vast majority switched by the end of the hour and a half long event.. Cain joined former Senator Rick Santorum, Congressman Ron Paul and former Governors Tim Pawlenty and Gary Johnson for the first GOP Presidential debate held Thursday night in South Carolina. Santorum came in second with Luntz’s group. Other presumed candidates were not present, something the focus group did not appreciate.
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Rep. Peter King is one of the blowhards of the GOP who uses every opportunity to paint President Obama and the Democratic Party as weak on national security, but now listen to what he said to Bill O’Reilly after pumping the torture meme: KING: And that’s why I think it’s really wrong, whether it’s Democrats or Republicans, when they go out of their way to take cheap, personal shots at a President. It’s OK to criticize, but they are going through incredible stress and strains at all times and one small mistake; now just think if the President made the wrong decision when he OK’s the mission, you could have had civilians killed and you could have had Navy SEALs wiped out…. O’REILLY: It was a daring mission… Do you think he was talking about himself? I’ll never forget when he told people at the Merrick Jewish Center that conditions on the ground in Iraq were just like Manhattan back in 2006. As soon as the underwear bomber was arrested he immediately took to the airwaves to ridicule Obama and the administration because the suspect was arrested and given his Miranda warning. Peter King thinks the key to protecting America is for Obama to use the word “Terror” more. New York Rep. Peter King, a leading Republican critic of the White House on terror policy, offered a piece of advice on Good Morning America today: Obama should speak the word “terrorism” more. “You are saying someone should be held accountable. Name one other specific recommendation the president could implement right now to fix this,” host George Stephanopoulos said to King. “I think one main thing would be to — just himself to use the word terrorism more often ,” said King, the ranking Republican on the Homeland Security Committee What about this fearmongering of the Times Square plot? KING: Well, I was very critical of the administration for the Major Hasan shooting. I was also very critical of the Abdulmutallab incident on Christmas Day. As far as this one, Chris, the evidence isn’t in yet as to what was available. Based on what we’ve seen, I don’t know if we could have stopped him before he got — Shahzad before he got to Times Square. We’ll have to wait until, you know, all the dots are put out there. It’s very difficult because we don’t get very much information from this administration. But one real criticism I do have, Chris, is what happened in the last hours of the investigation. Beginning some time on Monday afternoon, high administration sources were leaking out the most confidential, classified information which compromised this investigation, put lives at risk and very probably caused Shahzad to escape and make it undetected to the airport. Or this golden oldie: Peter King Compares Obama Not Doing Press Conference on Bomb Plot to Bush Not Going to New Orleans After Katrina And who can forget his ridiculous attacks of Comedy Central? Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.), the ranking member of the House Homeland Security Committee, said that a car bomb found Saturday night in Times Square might have been the work of Islamic extremists who were upset over an episode of the Comedy Central series that attempted to depict the prophet Muhammad. It’s one possibility out of 100, but this vehicle was close to a Viacom building, which owns MTV and Comedy Central,” King said Sunday during an appearance on CNN. ” Maybe he’ll tell Kit Bond the same thing. Administration’s handling of Christmas bombing suspect Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab and Bush’s similar handling of shoe-bomber Richard Reid in an appearance on MSNBC’s “Daily Rundown.” On Tuesday, Bond had called for Deputy National Security Adviser John Brennan’s resignation after an increasingly politicized debate on how the administration has handled the Abdulmutallab case. During the MSNBC interview, anchor Savannah Guthrie asked Senator Bond to make a distinction between the mirandizing of previous terror suspects and Abdulmutallab. “When Richard Reid was mirandized, treated in the civilian court system, same as Zacarius Moussaoui, the 9/11 co-conspirator, did you call for anyone’s resignation because of that?” Guthrie asked. “It’s a lot different time,” Bond responded. “We now have military commissions…It turns out that mirandizing Richard Reid and trying him in the civilian courts was a bad idea.” “He is serving a life sentence right now, he will never get out. How is that a failure?” Guthrie shot back. Read on… Maybe he had a pang of remorse after acting like a jerk all those other times, but I doubt. Maybe all the heat he took for his race baiting Muslim hearings had something to do it with? Maybe it was because he got busted for being an IRA supporter? Long before he became an outspoken voice in Congress about the threat from terrorism, he was a fervent supporter of a terrorist group, the Irish Republican Army . “We must pledge ourselves to support those brave men and women who this very moment are carrying forth the struggle against British imperialism in the streets of Belfast and Derry,” Mr. King told a pro-I.R.A. rally on Long Island, where he was serving as Nassau County comptroller, in 1982. Three years later he declared, “If civilians are killed in an attack on a military installation, it is certainly regrettable, but I will not morally blame the I.R.A. for it.” I do know that I’ll remind him of his new words every time he tries to demonize Obama’s national security policies.
Continue reading …Michael Rosen and Alan Gibbons line up to reject proposal for primary schools floated by national curriculum panel Children’s authors are gearing up for a fight over whether schools should be given government-approved lists of books that children should have read by the time they reach a certain age. Authors Michael Rosen and Alan Gibbons appear first in line in the latest round of what has almost become a national sport in England over the last 25 years – criticising ministers for seeking to prescribe what they see as the best texts. The idea of replicating in primary schools what already happens in the first three years of secondary schools is being floated by a small panel of experts set up by the education secretary, Michael Gove, to review the national curriculum for five to 16-year-olds, according to the Times Educational Supplement (TES) . Rosen , a former children’s laureate, told the TES : “I’m all in favour of people recommending books to each other. What I’m utterly against is some centralised list which is supposed to be the government’s view or the state’s view. “If Michael Gove wants to suggest his list, that’s fine. But if it is the government’s list or the DfE’s list, I would profoundly distrust it.” He later said: “If Michael Gove says who’s recommending them [the books and authors], then that’s democratic, that’s the way we share ideas. “If it’s just a dictation that this is the way we read books, then we don’t live in a totalitarian country, we’re not in Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia, where they dictated what books you have to read.” Gibbons said: “What we need to see in schools is trust in teachers and librarians. We need a network of people who know about books and keep up to date with children’s literature, who have the freedom to select books according to their pupils’ backgrounds and interests.” Under the current primary curriculum children are expected to be introduced to a range of writing, including fiction, poetry, myths and plays, but there is no central list specifying books or authors. In secondary schools, the current curriculum for 11 to 14-year-olds includes a recommended list of authors and demands that pupils study Shakespeare. In March, Gove suggested that children from the age of 11 should be reading far more than at present – up to 50 books a year . He claimed pupils were only reading one or two books, often Of Mice and Men, by John Steinbeck, and invited children’s authors to recommend their own favourites. The current children’s laureate, Anthony Browne, said then: “It’s always good to hear that the importance of children’s reading is recognised – but rather than setting an arbitrary number of books that children ought to read, I feel it’s the quality of children’s reading experiences that really matter. Pleasure, engagement and enjoyment of books is what counts – not simply meeting targets.” The prospect of state-directed reading has been a bone of contention for decades but arguments have been more heated since another bibliophile education secretary Kenneth Baker began laying the groundwork for the national curriculum in the mid-1980s. Guardian writers have never been backward in recommending their own favourites. Last May a list for five to seven-year-olds included Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, by Roald Dahl, The Worst Witch, by Jill Murphy, and The Legend of Captain Crow’s Teeth, by Eoin Colfer. Inevitably JK Rowling’s Harry Potter was recommended for 8 to 11-year-olds, as were CS Lewis’s Narnia books and Jacqueline Wilson’s The Story of Tracy Beaker. The Department for Education said: “We want to create a world-class curriculum that will help teachers, parents and children know what children should learn at what age. We are currently reviewing all aspects of the national curriculum and will consult fully on the programmes of study when the review concludes.” The review is still in its early stages. Recommended programmes of study for English and other core subjects are expected to be put out for consultation early next year with decisions made by ministers in the spring. They will be sent to schools in September 2012. Literacy National curriculum Schools Education policy Michael Gove Michael Rosen Anthony Browne James Meikle guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Academic sorts have declared modern pop to be chock-a-block with narcissism. Gwilym Mumford checks the charts for proof “Whoever loves becomes humble. Those who love have, so to speak, pawned a part of their narcissism.” The words of cigar and incest aficionado Sigmund Freud. Unfortunately, for anyone who still values a concept as hackneyed as “love” in the age of Bieber, a new study into pop lyrics has unearthed a pronounced shift away from caring and sharing for one another and towards a form of – for want of a better phrase – aggressive narcissism. Dr Nathan DeWall and fellows of the University of Kentucky used the lyrical content of the Billboard Hot 100 chart from 1980 to 2007 as the basis for their results, and claim that the rampant spread of ego-pop is in keeping with the broader social trends of the much fretted-about 16-24 age group. Of course, this study was restricted to the US, where a man who refers to himself as “The Donald” is somehow polling credibly for the Republican presidential nomination, but what of our own sceptred isle? A look into the lyrical content of this week’s UK top 40 broadly suggests a similar movement towards narcissism, though there are some notable caveats. Firstly, it must be noted that the American artists currently occupying the top spots across the pond are largely dominant here, with only the likes of Birdy, Adele, Jessie J, Starboy Nathan and Katy B breaking up the J-Lo-led hegemony. Equally, R&B and hip-hop have a near universal presence in the chart – that’s J-Lo again – skewing the subject matter somewhat. One suspects that a study taken during the “landfill indie” boom of the mid-noughties would have resulted in less talk of poppin’ Cristal and more weeping uncontrollably at sunsets. Still, suggestions that pop has descended entirely into shrill self-aggrandisement do seem off the mark. A quick run-through of the lyrics of this week’s top 40 show that the words used most frequently are: Like, Tonight, Got, Wanna and Dollar. Not only does this bear out DeWall’s theory, they would make a fairly typical lyric. There are, however, a decent smattering of socially conscious tracks dotted around the chart, touching on topics as varied as feminism (Beyoncé’s Run The World), gay and lesbian rights (Lady Gaga’s Born This Way), and just being accepted for who you really are (Loser Like Me, by the ever-present cast of Glee). Even the bone-headed Party Rock Anthem by LMFAO smuggles a message of boozy amicability in among the braggadocio. What’s more, the displays of narcissism present in modern pop tend to be as carefully manufactured as the messages of love and solidarity. The Black Eyed Peas, currently at No 13 with Just Can’t Get Enough, vacillate so frequently between self-centredness (My Humps) and We Are The World-apeing calls for global group hugs (I Gotta Feeling, Where Is The Love) that it’s hard to imagine anyone taking either of their personas entirely seriously. And Lady Gaga receives more press coverage for the manner in which she promotes and publicises her songs than for the actual music itself. Narcissism may be on the rise, but it’s probably fake. Let’s hope that proves some consolation. Pop and rock guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Lost in the moral maze surrounding Osama bin Laden’s death? John Ford’s classic western will show you the way As a certain someone once said: there’s an old poster out west … actually, forgive me. There’s an old poster by my desk, as I type this, for a movie that would have been at the forefront of my mind this week even were I not staring at a picture of Jimmy Stewart holding a pistol and looking rather troubled . If you haven’t seen The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance , then consider yourself immensely lucky, because you have the most wonderful treat ahead of you. The gazillions who know and love the John Ford classic, though, will be familiar with the story, set in a frontier town menaced by the outlaw Liberty Valance. Our principals are the grizzled cowboy John Wayne and the idealist newcomer Jimmy Stewart. A lefty lawyer beginning his political career, Stewart takes a frightful kicking from the start, but sticks with his programme of social reforms for the town – you may be on the point of spotting the analogy – working to improve education and even racial equality. Of Liberty Valance, he insists to John Wayne: “I don’t want to kill him. I just want to put him in jail.” Who’d have thunk it, then, that the person who should face down the outlaw in a duel is not John Wayne, but Jimmy Stewart. And who’d have thunk it even more that it is the bookish idealist who kills Liberty Valance with a single shot, in a piece of good fortune he can scarcely believe. Needless to say he becomes the town hero, and gets Wayne’s gal. It is only subsequently that Wayne tells him that the shot that killed Valance in the so-called duel was in fact fired by him, from across the street. Not the fairest of fights, you might be thinking – but in the Duke’s mind, the end justified the means. He urges Stewart to run for office and live up to the status this misattributed act has bestowed upon him – which Stewart duly does, becoming the state’s first governor and then a senator. Yet weighed down by the moral compromise on which his success is based, he finally confesses all to a local newsman when he returns from Washington for John Wayne’s funeral. Now he has learned the truth about Liberty Valance’s death, does the reporter debunk the myth? Please. He burns his notes, uttering the immortal line: “This is the west, sir. When the legend becomes fact, print the legend.” And so to Barack Obama, who will forever be The Man Who Shot Osama Bin Laden, with all the inevitable moral grey areas the title implies. Admittedly, the facts about Bin Laden’s shooting have been corrected rather sooner than those concerning the death of Liberty Valance. At this rate, it will emerge by Monday that the al-Qaida chief was naked, with his hands up, and shrieking, “Not the face! I’ll tell you everything!” when he was gunned down. But whilst it might appear that the ineptitude of the White House communications department is rivalled only by that of the Pakistani security services, those first golden hours of mythmaking have shaped the narrative that will endure in American consciousness. The legend has become fact. For my own part, despite considering myself a liberal, I must confess my tears have struggled to liquefy over the manner of the unarmed Osama’s dispatch. It’s not that my bleeding heart is all out of type A, nor am I summoning the cartographers, having finally discovered the outer limit of my liberal sensibilities. But it has been a while since I’ve had to make imperfect sense out of this type of moral muddle without the aid of West Wing creator Aaron Sorkin. This extraordinary tale really is made for Sorkin, that most brilliant poet of liberal realpolitik, in whose hands its moral complexities and compromises would stay lodged in the public consciousness far longer than the current mudslinging between the CIA, Pakistan, the military and the international lawyers could ever guarantee. Channel-hopping only a few hours before the White House announced Bin Laden’s killing, I happened to stumble upon the Sorkin-scripted movie A Few Good Men, and watch for the umpteenth time Jack Nicholson’s terrible bastard of a colonel deliver that horribly convincing post-moral speech about why Tom Cruise’s college boy lawyer can’t handle the truth. That movie ends with Colonel Jessep facing trial, quite rightly, and it is difficult to disagree in theory that the Bin Laden story should have ended in a courtroom too – though what the al-Qaida Nuremberg would look like is anyone’s guess. Rather than taking place post-conflict, it would involve trying one’s enemy in an information war, while that war is still ongoing. (Incidentally, can you remember a single thing from Saddam’s trial? I’m ashamed to say all that sticks in my mind is the thought of the trapdoor opening at his hanging.) Indeed, as far as The Man Who Shot Osama Bin Laden goes, one can’t overlook that its Liberty Valance precursor was a story about the end of frontier – the creation of civil democracy out of a land of vigilantism and wild west brute force. Given that we are supposed to live in that civil democracy today, I know it would have been better – or perhaps righter – to have brought Osama to trial. But I can also see how it was never going to work out that way. And I do hope that Aaron Sorkin is the man to create enduring cinematic magic out of that Gordian knot. Osama bin Laden Obama administration Barack Obama John Ford James Stewart John Wayne US politics United States Marina Hyde guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Quick-cook polenta is one of the great standbys of the store cupboard. But it needs a bit of embellishment to show off its best side Of all the dry store cupboard ingredients, quick-cook polenta makes the fastest meal. But remember that polenta needs plenty of enhancements – butter, cheese, olive oil – to turn on its soft and soothing charm. Grilled green polenta (V) This rich dish needs a simple, sharp salad. Later in the year, try diced tomatoes very lightly dressed with olive oil and red-wine vinegar instead of this rocket salad. Serves six. 40g basil 20g parsley 20g rocket 10g tarragon 1 clove garlic, crushed 70ml olive oil, plus extra for greasing 600ml water 150g quick-cook polenta 70g parmesan (or other mature hard cheese), grated 70g unsalted butter Salt and black pepper 100g ricotta For the salad 100g rocket 250g cherry tomatoes, halved ½ small red onion, thinly sliced 4 tbsp olive oil 1 tbsp lemon juice Put all the herbs, the crushed garlic and the olive oil in a food processor, blitz to a paste and set aside. In a large pan, bring the water to a
Continue reading …