Staff close Beijing shop after scuffle breaks out in frenzy to buy newly launched white iPhone 4 A fight broke out between an employee and a customer at an Apple store in China’s capital amid a frenzy to buy the newly launched white iPhone 4, a witness said. Wang Ming, 30, said the scuffle at the Apple store in Beijing’s Sanlitun district on Saturday was between a “foreign” Apple staffer and a Chinese customer. An Apple spokeswoman in China, Carolyn Wu, said the store “was closed for several hours on Saturday after a group outside the store became unruly”. “The store team acted to protect themselves and our customers by closing the doors and preventing the group from entering,” Wu said. “The safety of our customers and employees is our top priority.” She would not provide more details. Reports on some Chinese news websites said three or four customers were injured. Wang said he had walked out of the store and was passing by the scuffle when a bottle hit his head, causing a gash. Demand for the iPhone and iPad in China has been high, with some iPhones being bought to resell at higher prices. Apple reported quarterly results for its 321 worldwide shops in January showing that on average those in China clocked the highest traffic and revenue per store. Most of the revenue came from iPhone and iPad sales. The California-based company said then that the quarterly revenue from China, Hong Kong and Taiwan was $2.6bn, about 10% of its total revenue and four times the year-earlier figure. Apple iPhone Mobile phones China guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …The Hamaoka nuclear plant, which sits near a major fault line in Shizuoka prefecture, is considered Japan’s most vulnerable nuclear facility The operator of Japan’s “most dangerous” nuclear plant is to decide whether to comply with a government request to temporarily close the facility and carry out work to improve its ability to withstand earthquakes and tsunamis. Chubu Electric is considering the request to close the Hamaoka nuclear plant in Shizuoka prefecture, central Japan, which is thought to be the country’s most vulnerable nuclear facility. Located 125 miles west of Tokyo, it sits near a major fault line in a region where seismologists say there is an 87% chance of an earthquake of magnitude 8.0 or higher striking in the next 30 years. Fears are mounting in the wake of the Fukushima Daiichi crisis that another large quake and tsunami could cause radiation leaks that, depending on wind direction, could have a serious impact on the capital. The issue of the Hamaoka plant was raised as concern grows over a dramatic rise in the temperature inside a reactor building at Fukushima Daiichi, scene of the world’s worst nuclear accident since Chernobyl. The temperature inside the pressure vessel of the No 3 reactor rose to 217C on Sunday evening from 163C on Saturday morning. But the plant’s operator, Tokyo Electric Power [Tepco], said that was still lower than the 286C observed during normal operations, adding that it would continue to monitor the unit. The No 3 reactor is of particular concern because it contains plutonium-uranium mixed oxide fuel – or MOX – and would release highly toxic plutonium in the event of a meltdown. Japan’s prime minister, Naoto Kan, has bowed to pressure from the public and key scientific advisers and asked Chubu Electric to immediately shut down Hamaoka’s two working reactors. A third reactor has been shut down for inspection and two others are being decommissioned. If Kan’s request is accepted, the plant would remain closed while a tsunami-resistant wall is built and emergency backup generators installed to improve its ability to function after a natural disaster. Company officials estimate it will take two to three years to build a 12-metre-high tsunami wall stretching nearly a mile along the Pacific coast. At present the plant is protected by sand hills high enough to withstand an 8-metre tsunami. The waves that knocked out the power at Fukushima Daiichi were at least 14 metres high. About 79,800 people live within a 6-mile (10km) radius of the Hamaoka plant. While Kan’s order is not legally binding, Chubu Electric is expected to comply, despite concerns that the closure of its only nuclear plant could cause power shortages in central Japan this summer. The three functioning reactors at Hamaoka, which supplies power to 16 million people, including the nearby headquarters of carmakers Toyota and Suzuki, account for more than 10% of its power supply. Chubu Electric estimates peak demand this summer will run at about 26m kilowatts, with output at 30m kilowatts provided the reactors are running. The firm is examining the possibility of boosting output from gas, oil and coal- fired plants, as well as buying in power from other utilities. Chubu Electric’s chairman, Toshio Mita, is in Qatar to discuss the possible provision of liquefied natural gas to help cover the shortfall. The government indicated over the weekend that Japan was committed to nuclear power, despite the Fukushima Daiichi accident and growing public disquiet. Kan said the proposed Hamaoka shutdown was an “exceptional case” given its vulnerability to quake and tsunami damage. “If an accident occurs at Hamaoka, it could have serious consequences,” he said, adding there were no plans to shut any more of Japan’s 54 nuclear reactors. “Our energy policy is to stick to nuclear power,” Yoshito Sengoku, the deputy chief cabinet secretary, told reporters. Tepco appears to making progress in reaching its self-imposed deadline of between six and nine months to stabilise the Fukushima Daiichi plant and achieve “cold shutdown”. Workers could soon be able to enter the No 1 reactor building to install new cooling systems, the company said, after readings showed a drop in radiation levels. Contamination levels inside the building have fallen sufficiently to allow workers in protective clothing to enter for short periods, the country’s nuclear safety agency said, adding that the doors to the building were opened Sunday night to promote ventilation. Workers entered early Monday morning to check radiation levels ahead of a decision on whether to proceed with work to install cooling systems. Japan disaster Japan Nuclear power Justin McCurry guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …The readers’ editor on … a day of too much pomp and circumstance Complaints to the Guardian’s readers’ editor, and the paper’s letters’ page, about the royal wedding coverage convey a general sense that the Guardian has betrayed a long-standing history of republicanism. Not so. Certainly not the “long-standing” bit, anyway. Ian Mayes , the paper’s first readers’ editor, who is now writing a history of the Guardian, tells me that it was only 11 years ago that the Guardian came out for a republic: “The Guardian’s first real trawl through the issue was a week of features starting 7 January 1995 under the general heading, “The New Republic: an important Guardian series on what Britain would be like without a monarchy”. A leader to launch it said: “This paper has always been agnostic about the monarchy and remains so.”
Continue reading …The readers’ editor on … a day of too much pomp and circumstance Complaints to the Guardian’s readers’ editor, and the paper’s letters’ page, about the royal wedding coverage convey a general sense that the Guardian has betrayed a long-standing history of republicanism. Not so. Certainly not the “long-standing” bit, anyway. Ian Mayes , the paper’s first readers’ editor, who is now writing a history of the Guardian, tells me that it was only 11 years ago that the Guardian came out for a republic: “The Guardian’s first real trawl through the issue was a week of features starting 7 January 1995 under the general heading, “The New Republic: an important Guardian series on what Britain would be like without a monarchy”. A leader to launch it said: “This paper has always been agnostic about the monarchy and remains so.”
Continue reading …12-year-old boy reported killed as residents describe hearing gunfire and shelling President Bashar al-Assad has sent tanks deep into Syria’s third city, Homs, escalating a military campaign to crush a seven-week-old uprising against his autocratic rule. Syrians demanding political freedom and an end to corruption have held weeks of what they say are peaceful demonstrations in the face of government repression, despite a civilian death toll that has reached 800, according to the Syrian human rights organisation Sawasiah. On Sunday, residents in Homs said they heard machine-gun fire and shelling as troops made their first incursion into residential areas of the city of 1 million people, 100 miles north of Damascus. At least one person, a 12-year-old child, was killed when tanks and troops went into the Bab Sebaa, Bab Amro and Tal al-Sour districts of Homs during the night, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights. “The areas have been under total siege since yesterday,” the organisation said. “There is a total blackout on the numbers of dead and injured. Telecommunications and electricity are repeatedly being cut in those districts.” Elsewhere, a witness said security forces killed at least two unarmed demonstrators when they fired on a night rally in the eastern city of Deir al-Zor. Assad has made clear he will not tolerate dissent or risk losing the tight control his family has had over the country for the past 41 years. The pro-democracy upheaval that began in Deraa on 18 March, inspired by similar revolts across the Arab world, intensified on Friday across Hauran, an agricultural belt bordering Jordan to the south and the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights to the west. In the south, tanks swept into several towns on Sunday. A man was killed when security forces broke into his home in the southern town of Tafas, a rights campaigner in the region said. A Jordanian statesman, Adnan Abu Oudeh, said two models had emerged during the Arab democratic revolution. “Egypt and Tunisia, where there is an established concept of the state and of the army as an institution of the state … and the Libyan and Yemeni model. “Syria belongs to the latter,” said Abu Oudeh, who is a board member of the International Crisis Group, an independent conflict resolution group. An opposition figure said that even if the half a million members of Syria’s army and other security forces, which are led by officers of the Alawite minority to which Assad belongs, continued to obey the 45-year-old president, he would not be able to crush the growing popular hostility to his rule. “The shocks of the military campaign are being absorbed,” he said. “We have seen that as soon as the army withdraws or lessens its presence in one area to crush people elsewhere, protests erupt in the area the forces had left. Assad is using Israeli tactics, but will not be able to occupy all of Syria with his loyalists.” Protesters are demanding political freedoms, an end to corruption and the departure of Assad. Syrian authorities have blamed the protests on “armed terrorist groups” they say are operating in Deraa, Banias, Homs and other parts of the country. The official state news agency said an “armed gang”, a term used of opponents of the government, had ambushed a bus near Homs and shot dead 10 civilian workers returning from Lebanon. Syria Arab and Middle East unrest Bashar Al-Assad Protest Middle East guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …• Barclays sets aside £1bn to cover compensation • British Bankers Association drops case • Payment protection insurance wrongly sold to millions One of the UK banking industry’s most serious mis-selling scandals in decades is drawing to a close, after the banks abandoned their legal challenge against compensating customers who were mis-sold payment protection insurance. Barclays became the first of the major UK banks to apologise for its role in the £9bn debacle as the British Bankers Association announced on Monday morning that it is dropping its appeal against tougher controls on how PPI is sold. With the legal battle over, UK banks will now begin in earnest the task of identifying victims and making redress. The move comes just four days after Lloyds Banking Group stunned the City by putting £3.2bn aside to cover compensation claims relating to PPI, which was wrongly sold to millions of customers since the late 1990s. This was roughly double the previous estimate. Barclays, which had a smaller share of the PPI market than Lloyds, is taking a £1bn provision to cover its PPI bill. Chief executive Bob Diamond said Barclays had decided to withdraw from the BBA appeal – as Lloyds did last week – to provide “certainty” for both customers and shareholders. “We don’t always get things right for our customers; when we get them wrong, we apologise and put them right. That’s our commitment to our customers, and it applies to the way in which we will deal with PPI complaints,” said Diamond. Royal Bank of Scotland has welcomed the BBA’s move. “We will update our customers and shareholders as soon as possible on the steps we agree with the FSA, the likely timeframe, and the anticipated costs of redress,” said RBS. “This is an important step for all UK banks in our efforts to restore the confidence and trust of consumers.” Analysts believe RBS will need to set aside around £1bn to cover its own PPI claims . Stephen Hester, chief executive of the company, admitted last week that the bank would need to make a provision in the second quarter of 2011 – the size of which was still being calculated – and indicated that the bank’s share of PPI sales was around a third of Lloyds, the market leader. PPI was meant to help policyholders keep up with their mortgage, credit card or loan repayments if they lost their job or became ill, and was sold alongside these financial products. Many customers, though, bought PPI even though they would not be able to claim, or were even sold it without their knowledge. The Financial Services Authority has now imposed much tighter controls on how PPI is sold. Borrowers must now be informed that the insurance is an optional extra, and cannot be approached until at least seven days after they have signed up for their loan or credit card. The banks, through the BBA, had attempted to prevent these rules being applied retrospectively, saying this was a point of principle, but suffered defeat in the high court last month. They had been given until Tuesday to decide whether to seek leave to appeal. In a statement, the BBA said: “In the interest of providing certainty for their customers, the banks and the BBA have decided that they do not intend to appeal. “We continue to believe that there are matters of important principle which we will be taking forward in other ways with the authorities.” Banking Barclays Lloyds Banking Group Royal Bank of Scotland Bob Diamond Graeme Wearden Jill Treanor guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Mohamed Munadi’s Tunisian village was barely affected by the uprising, but he was one of many who fled when Libya erupted Everybody on the boat smoked. There was nothing else to do, except when the storms came and waves battered the vessel, as water sloshed across the deck and passengers frantically bailed it out. For 22-year-old Mohamed Munadi, the storms were a respite. They gave him something else to focus on. “To be lost there where the water is black … it’s worse than the desert,” he said, drawing on a cigarette in the early evening sunshine of Oria, the town in southern Italy where many Tunisian migrants are based. “You get scared, and you start to imagine how you will die. Sometimes I imagined I would drink so much sea water that I would die, or that my heart would stop from fear. Eventually I would sleep. And at those moments I would ask myself: ‘Mohamed, you did all this for Europe? All this for a job?’” When the French president, Nicolas Sarkozy, and Italian prime minister, Silvio Berlusconi, staged a summit in Rome on 26 April to press for the partial reinstatement of national border controls in Europe in the event of undefined “exceptional circumstances”, they had people like Munadi in mind. He and thousands of others have fuelled high-level political bickering inside Europe’s corridors of power, with some politicians demanding a fortification of the continent’s external frontiers and curbs on freedom of travel within the EU. This year has seen a sharp spike in migrants seeking to reach Europe from north Africa, where dramatic political upheavals have created social insecurity and relaxed border controls. On average 30,000 migrants a year land on Lampedusa, the Italian island just 60 miles off the coast of Tunisia. In the past four months that number has already been exceeded. “I haven’t seen a television for two months, but we hear about the politics, the meetings and the deals,” said Munadi. “It’s strange that control over your life is in the hands of people you don’t know, people you will never meet. Only they know what will happen. Our job is to wait, always be waiting.” Leaving Tunisia After he set out at night from the Tunisian village of Dahibah on 10 March, leaving his family behind and beginning a 2,000-mile journey north, Munadi’s life became a bundle of extremes, of the epic and the mundane. The decision to leave home was the biggest of his life; now, waiting in a camp for a permit that would determine his future, he was at the mercy of bureaucrats in far-off offices who made decisions about what he could eat, where he could sleep and how his life would unfold. His horizons had expanded to take in a new continent, yet he was focused solely on obtaining a 9cm-by-12cm scrap of paper to determine his eligibility to reside legally in Europe. He never imagined he would leave Dahibah, a Tunisia-Libya border town where he worked with his brothers as a petrol smuggler. Many Tunisians now in Lampedusa were caught up directly in January’s ousting of Ben Ali, and feared the political and economic chaos they believed would and inevitably engulf the nation in the coming months and years. “You can’t relax in a place where the forces of law and order are patrolling with tanks, and 31 political factions are fighting over who will take control,” said a 26-year-old student, one of 1,200 Tunisians also based in Oria. For Munadi in Dahibah, the tumultuous politics of the capital seemed a long way away, and his biggest preoccupation was the house he was building on his parents’ land. “During the day I would surf the internet, and in the evening I and my friends would go out into the desert hunting for rabbits. We would make a fire and camp out there, and take photos as a souvenir. It’s a special place, not really part of Tunisia. There’s not many police around. tThe government gives us a few logistical things but apart from that we have no relationship with them. The village belongs to its people.” The absence of the state in Munadi’s neighbourhood made revolution in January difficult to comprehend. The regular blows rained down by the corrupt and brutal security apparatus of Tunisia’s regime on much of the population were rarely felt in the semi-lawless frontier town of Dahibah. When Munadi’s family heard Ben Ali had been deposed they were pleased, but it was news detached from their own world, and – initially at least – life continued as normal. “Then the Libyan people tried to move,” said Munadi, “and Gaddafi moved too, and everything became dangerous. When he moved, we moved because the border broke and everything we were doing, the smuggling, the life we led, it had to stop. I knew that if I stayed I would have no job. And I knew that if I had the energy, I had to try to get out, find something new.” Munadi’s parents tried to dissuade him from joining the thousands of Tunisians who were taking advantage of the country’s post-revolutionary chaos to evade border patrols and head across the Mediterranean in search of employment in the EU. But Munadi was determined. He made contact with a fixer in the port city of Djerba, who charged 2,000 dinars (£900) for passage on a fishing boat. In the early hours of 17 March, after a week in an apartment waiting for the weather to clear, he and two friends put all their belongings together in a single sack, climbed on to a raft, and floated out to the boat. Fifty other migrants were already on board, waiting. “The captain of the boat was only 20, and yet he was so calm and professional,” recalled Munadi. “Most of those on board were from Djerba, working in tourism or fishing. We were all so happy, smiling, singing, making videos on our phone.” On the second day, however, a storm blew up and everything changed. “The captain came to us and said: ‘As long as the winds don’t get any stronger than this, we will live. But if the wind grows, I’ll just say I’m sorry, because for sure we will die.’ I’ll never forget this moment for as long as I live. I could tell you about it for hours and you still wouldn’t understand. You have to experience it, to know what it’s like to think it’s done, this life is over.” After three days, Munadi’s boat landed on Lampedusa, the tiny Italian outpost that has become a magnet for those trying to reach Europe from north Africa. Its permanent population is no more than 5,000; so far this year, six times that number have tumbled ashore on the island’s port and beaches. Some are Libyans, or Libyan-based workers from other countries also fleeing the conflict between Muammar Gaddafi and anti-government revolutionaries, while others are sub-Saharan refugees. But the majority are economic migrants from Tunisia who have arrived in droves over the past three months, fanning out across Lampedusa’s gentle, scuffed-idyll landscape and constructing temporary homes in caves, deserted farmhouses, pockets of scrubland and half-empty churches. Many hardships await those who land illegally on the island, but more than 800 have died trying to reach it in the last months alone according to the UN’s refugee agency, UNHCR, and for Munadi the overwhelming sensation on arrival was relief. “It wasn’t just Lampedusa, it was another life. You can say that when I put my foot in the port, I was born again. The sea was like death, and Lampedusa was like life.” The stories of those on Lampedusa charged with rescuing distressed migrants from the sea confirm his luck. “Many of those we pick up have been travelling like sardines for days,” said Lieutenant Diego Bianchi, a doctor with the Order of Malta. “They can’t move. They can’t answer to their body’s needs. They can’t help each other. Some are risking death because down below the air can be impossible to breathe. Those that have travelled from beyond the Sahara have already been on the road for months, and the damage is not just physical – these are exhausted, demoralised people when they arrive.” Far-flung from its Italian administrators, Lampedusa has been a focus of immigration for hundreds of years, hosting ancient seafarers from the Phoenicians to the Romans. Out by the lighthouse a six-metre signpost stands testament to a long heritage of transitory visitors, pointing in the directions of dozens of cities across the planet whose citizens have, at one time or another, wound up here. At the height of the crisis, Tunisian migrants could be seen in every corner of the island. Today evidence of the latest human influx lies tucked away in the holiday resort’s nooks and crannies, such as an under-construction swimming pool built into the hills on the edge of town. Mattresses, empty tuna tins and discarded clothing litter the floor, scattered randomly below the pool’s wide wooden beams. On the granite walls, overlapping graffiti tell of the utilisation of this space by both local youths and migrants, knitting their concerns together in an explosion of scraggly technicolour. One concrete section is daubed in Italian with 2.5-metre-high letters: “Hey Loco, Ti Amo!” The slab next to it is in Arabic: “Horreya” (freedom), it reads. Munadi stayed on Lampedusa for 10 days. “We slept out in the open in the port, because the [migrant detention] centre was full. To fill the time we would go on journeys around, looking at the coast and the sea.” Finally he was processed at the centre, given a temporary ID card, and placed with 1,400 other migrants on a ferry to the southern Italian town of Taranto. “They searched us all before getting on the boat and took away any objects that could be dangerous. Even our shoelaces. They knew we were full of stress.” On 1 April, Munadi arrived in mainland Europe and was bussed to a detention centre in the Puglia region of southern Italy. Set in a grassy wasteland between the towns of Manduria and Oria and buttressed by a series of stone ruins, the blue-tent city is surrounded by barbed wire, guarded by dozens of police units – including mounted horse patrols – and subject to helicopter surveillance from the air. Originally designed to accommodate 1,500 people, the camp’s existence sparked tensions with the residents of Oria. By the time Munadi arrived there were more than 2,000 migrants inside the camp, served by two food distribution points, a shower block that regularly failed to work, and almost no official sources of information about what would be happening next. A camp on edge The international medical organisation Médecins Sans Frontières has described conditions in Italian migrant centres as “intolerable”, worse than refugee camps in other parts of the world where the NGO operates, and warned that this aggravates the mental state of those being held. “People get nervous. They don’t understand what’s happening,” said Munadi. “Some people get drunk and have fights; and so the whole place is on edge. I get scared because I haven’t met people like this before. Not everyone is good. Many times I’ve wished they would take me back to Tunisia, just to get away from this place.” In Munadi’s time at the camp there were two mass escapes by migrants. On the second one, Munadi made it on foot to Bari, 60 miles north, before being hauled back by police. Life in the camp settled into an uneasy routine after officials began processing temporary six-month residency visas for all those who landed on Lampedusa before 5 April, a condition that Munadi met. Each morning a list was posted up outside the camp’s police office detailing the names of those whose visas were ready for collection, but the process appeared largely random and in the absence of clear details about who would be getting the visas and when they would materialise, rumour and conspiracy theories quickly spread. Some migrants believed the camp food was being drugged to make them docile. Last month reports of camp officials charging migrants €30 for a visa almost provoked a riot. “We wake up for the lists alone,” said Munadi. “Often you don’t feel that you are human but you have to accept the conditions. The one thing you must keep in your mind is this is a problem about days, about hours, about nothing more than that.” Now they were waiting for their visas, the migrants were no longer locked inside the camp during the day and were free to walk a few miles into Oria, a little town of twisting alleys and stone archways, topped by a castle which plays host to historical re-enactments – a local obsession – every summer. The people of Oria have exhibited flashes of extraordinary kindness to the migrants who head in each morning for coffee. An Italian couple from the town once picked up Munadi in their car and took him for an impromptu day trip to the beach. But there have also been clashes. Shopkeepers have put up Arabic signs ordering only one person to enter their establishment at a time, while bars and cafes have started restricting the hours in which migrants are allowed to make use of their facilities. “We are a small town that relies heavily on tourism, and that’s being threatened by an invasive presence that has turned some people’s lives upside down,” said Emilio Dell’aquila, the local police commander. “I understand,” said Munadi. “It’s their home. We must always say ‘excuse us’ for our presence here.” At sundown the migrants gathered round small fires by the roadside and Munadi pointed out characters and cliques that dominated the rhythms of the camp. They included farmers, computer animators and a techno DJ. Some spent their time talking politics and debating the new Tunisia, and others would rather play football. “If I get the visa, I’ll go to Rome and take pictures – spend a day there, tourist and immigrant,” said Munadi. “After that I will try to reach Paris, where my friend’s cousin will get us a job in a bakery. It’s a simple job, and insha’allah we will become successful. My friend will cook the bread, and I will learn.” Getting the permit would mark only the beginning of one more uncertain phase in Munadi’s journey. Trains and buses require money but with no identification, he has found it difficult to use money transfer services through which family and friends could send him funds. At the French border, police have been stationed in an effort to block permit-holding Tunisian migrants from crossing into France under the EU’s “borderless” Schengen scheme, and trains suspected of carrying migrants have been turned back. Even if Munadi reaches Paris there is no guarantee that he will not face deportation proceedings at some point in the future. Arrest sweeps were carried out last week on Tunisian rough sleepers in several French cities. Back in Munadi’s home town of Dahibah, fighting in Libya had spilled across the border, leaving many dead and wounded. If the route back there seemed difficult, the path ahead was no less challenging. Meanwhile Munadi knew he would leave the camp armed only with some shampoo, a change of clothes and maybe a temporary visa to combat the bureaucratic struggles ahead. But he believed his struggle against borders would not last for ever. “Sometimes when I see the news, all the catastrophes and wars in this world, the revolutions and natural disasters, and I see people coming from Libya to Tunisia, Haiti to Canada, Serbia to Italy, all that makes me think that soon there will be no borders in this world,” he said. “It will be a miracle, but it will happen. We will go back to the first moments of humans on this earth, and move free.” Additional reporting by Mustafa Khalili and Valeria Testagrossa Arab and Middle East unrest Tunisia Libya Middle East Protest Italy Europe Refugees Jack Shenker guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Three constables reported seeing newspaper seller struck with baton and pushed to ground days before video emerged • The police witnesses who saw Tomlinson pushed (pdf) Senior police were told 48 hours after Ian Tomlinson’s death that officers had witnessed a colleague push him to the ground at the G20 protests, but the information was withheld from the police watchdog. The Guardian can reveal that three constables reported seeing Tomlinson being struck with a baton and pushed to the ground four days before video footage of the incident emerged. The Independent Police Complaints Commission is now investigating why information provided by Metropolitan Police constables Andrew Moore, Kerry Smith and Nicholas Jackson was not passed on to its investigators. The focus of the IPCC investigation is not likely to be the Met but City of London police, the tiny force that has jurisdiction over the Square Mile and was initially responsible for investigating Tomlinson’s death on 1 April 2009. Two days later, on 3 April, the Met told City of London police that three constables from Hammersmith and Fulham station had recognised the newspaper seller from pictures in the media. They said they were “adamant” they had seen a police officer strike him with baton and push him to the ground before his death. City of London officers investigating the death do not appear to have informed the IPCC, the coroner, the pathologist, Tomlinson’s family or the media. The first public admission that police witnesses may have seen their colleague attack Tomlinson at the G20 protests was on 8 April, the day after the release of video footage showing the incident in full. An inquest jury concluded last week that Tomlinson was “unlawfully killed” by Met police officer Simon Harwood at the protests. PCs Moore, Smith and Jackson turned out to be crucial witnesses – two of them gave evidence at the inquest. All three constables, level 2 trained public order officers, can be seen clearly in the footage and were standing just yards away from Tomlinson when he was attacked from behind by Harwood. It was Jackson who first made the connection when he saw photographs of Tomlinson being treated by medics in a newspaper. On 3 April he told his inspector that he recognised him as the same man who had been pushed to the ground by a police officer, and within hours senior officers had also contacted Moore and Smith, who had been standing beside him at Royal Exchange Buildings. They too confirmed they had seen the incident and one officer, Smith, said she had “expected blood” when she saw Tomlinson pushed. The three Met constables did not recognise Harwood – a territorial support group officer based at another station – and assumed he was a City of London police officer. A Hammersmith and Fulham inspector telephoned the Met’s “point of contact” for the Tomlinson investigation at 4.15pm on 3 April and told him his officers were convinced Tomlinson had been pushed by an officer before his death. The Met contact said he instantly realised the significance of the new information and relayed the details to City of London police before the postmortem examination was conducted by pathologist Dr Freddy Patel. However, Dr Patel was not told about the new police witnesses. City of London police, which had four officers at the autopsy, said the information was not passed to it by the Met until the autopsy was at an “advanced stage”. A senior IPCC official investigating the matter said there was an “obvious dispute” between the two forces about timing, although City of London police does not deny it received the information on 3 April. The following day, City of London police released a press statement announcing the newspaper seller had died of a “sudden” heart attack, but making no reference to the new information received from the three police witnesses. City of London investigators also authorised an IPCC statement which said there was “no evidence” the actions of police contributed in any way to his death. The April 4 statement was shelved at the last minute, after the watchdog was independently contacted by witnesses who suggested there may have been contact. The IPCC began investigating why its officials were not informed about the evidence supplied by Moore, Smith and Jackson last week after the Guardian gave the watchdog a summary of its investigation prior to publication. In a separate development, the IPCC is on Monday expected to release three reports relating to Tomlinson’s death. They include one report into Tomlinson’s death, another into whether a Met police officer misled two pathologists who examined the body and a third into complaints that police misled the media. None of the reports are expected to take into account the fact the Met and City of London police knew two days after his death that police witnesses had seen Tomlinson pushed by an officer. A Met spokesman confirmed three of its officers were identified as witnesses on 3 April, but said the force “took prompt and proper action to inform the investigating force, in this case City of London”. City of London police said the force would co-operate with any IPCC investigation. The latest disclosures are likely to fuel concerns already raised by Tomlinson’s family that information was withheld in what they have called a “cover-up”. Police told the family Tomlinson died of a heart attack before a postmortem had even taken place. Once the autopsy had taken place, they asked if there were marks on the body, but were not told by City of London police about an elongated bruise and puncture marks on the newspaper vendor’s leg. A senior City of London police officer recorded in his log that he did not pass information about marks on Tomlinson’s body to avoid “unnecessary alarm or distress”. Sir Hugh Orde, the president of the Association of Chief Police Officers, last week played down allegations of a cover-up. “There will of course be cases where people do close ranks,” he said. “The culture in some parts of policing is, without doubt, a certain internal one, and people feel deep loyal to their colleagues.” But he added: “We can say with some absolute justification that we have one of the most transparent police services in the world.” Ian Tomlinson Police Independent Police Complaints Commission G20 Crime Paul Lewis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …There certainly has been a lot of interesting comments made by the Obama-loving media this week following last Sunday's successful raid on Osama bin Laden's compound in Pakistan. One of the most surprising came from the Washington Post's Bob Woodward who told “Meet the Press” host David Gregory, “Being holed up in that compound was smug. It was raising a middle finger to the United States and saying, 'Hey, look, we're hiding right under your nose'” (video follows with transcript and commentary): BOB WOODWARD, WASHINGTON POST: People said, “Look, bin Laden and al-Qaeda is winning the war psychologically, and we're going to keep trying to get him.” And they realized that bin Laden would make a mistake, they would get complacent, and, and that's exactly what they did in taking–I mean, in a way, being holed up in that compound was smug. It was raising a middle finger to the United States and saying, “Hey, look, we're hiding right under your nose.” Although Woodward raised an interesting point, those videos of bin Laden sitting in a shabby room watching what looks like a 20 to 30 year old TV set don't present the image of a smug terrorist giving his enemies the finger. On the other hand, one does have to wonder exactly how long the man we've been hunting for almost ten years was living miles from Pakistan's capital avoiding detection by our vast intelligence network.
Continue reading …I admit, as a mother, I’m very biased on this. There are days where I am constantly moving, from 6 in the morning, when I get up to make breakfast and school lunches for my kids to well past midnight when I get that one last load of laundry in the dryer before collapsing into bed. There are a million and one things I have to keep in mind at all times: schedules, finicky diet preferences, homework assignments, birthday parties, the location of any and all needed sports equipment, electronic devices, gym clothes, shoes, etc. It never ends and each day I feel less behind than the day before is a triumph. I worked for more than a decade in corporate settings and I can tell you that there is no job that is more exhausting, more taxing physically, mentally, emotionally and spiritually than being a parent. But likewise, there are no jobs that are more rewarding…at least in ways other than financially . What’s mom worth? On the one hand, you could say that she’s “priceless.” On the other? “$61,436 a year.” That’s according to Amy Danise, senior managing editor of Insure.com, a website that supplies insurance information. Danise and her colleagues divided up mom’s function into 14 different jobs (cook, driver, nurse, etc.), then used Bureau of Labor Statistics on hourly wages to see how much you’d have to pay if mom were outsourced. If you didn’t have her, for example, you might have to spend $6,285 a year on transportation (taxi driver or chauffeur, priced at $13.43 an hour). For cleaning, you’d have to pay a maid or housekeeper $9.40 an hour, or $7,104 a year. [..]In the 14 jobs attributed to mom, there seems to be a glaring omission: Things she does for dad. Can you put a price on that? People, of course, do but we won’t get into that. Danise acknowledges this deficiency: “That’s the function we can’t put a dollar value on: love and support.” After all, there’s no job category for somebody loving and kind who looks under your bed to assure you there aren’t monsters, or who consoles you when you drop what would have been the winning fly ball; nobody who suffers through your piano recital or rides the carousel when she’d really rather not. And no mortician is going to help you bury your pet rabbit. So, thank you, mom. For all that and for so much more, there really is no value. It’s worth all the gold that probably isn’t in Ft. Knox. Julia Howe wrote a poem in honor of the establishment of an official Mother’s Day and on behalf of everyone here at C&L, Happy Mother’s Day to all the mommies out there.
Continue reading …