Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 1163)
Missing Federal Budget Story: Rising Federal Collections Still Miles Below Fiscal 2008

Sunday evening (at NewsBusters ; at BizzyBlog ), I predicted that the press will ignore the likelihood, based on the Congressional Budget Office's most recent Monthly Budget Review , that officially reported federal spending will top $1 trillion for the first time

Continue reading …
Chris Matthews: Tina Fey’s Sarah Palin ‘The Greatest Impression Ever’

As NewsBusters previously reported , NBC's Tina Fey once again impersonated former Alaska governor Sarah Palin while guest hosting this weekend's “Saturday Night Live.” The Palin-hating media were as usual enthralled by Fey's performance, with MSNBC's Chris Matthews actually saying on Monday's “Hardball,” “This has got to be the greatest impression ever” (video follows with transcript and commentary): CHRIS MATTHEWS, HOST: Up next: Tina Fey brings Sarah Palin back to “Saturday Night Live.” This has got to be the greatest impression ever. I mean, sometimes — I’m not going to talk about it anymore. It’s — she’s so good. You’re watching HARDBALL, only on MSNBC. MATTHEWS: Back to HARDBALL. Now to the “Sideshow.” First up: She’s back. On this weekend’s “SNL,” Tina Fey returned to her role as frontierswoman/presidential candidate Sarah Palin (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP, “SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE”) TINA FEY, ACTRESS: It is just so great to be back on FOX News, a network that both pays me and shows me the questions ahead of time. (LAUGHTER) FEY: And I just hope that, tonight, the lamestream media won’t twist my words by repeating them verbatim. (LAUGHTER) FEY: As for boning up on experience and policy, I’m planning a trip to the Middle East, where I will be filming a cameo in “Hangover 3,” the third “Hangover.” (LAUGHTER) FEY: The fellows go to bar, and I’m there. (LAUGHTER) FEY: I also recently purchased Rosetta Stone English. (LAUGHTER) (APPLAUSE) FEY: I want to acknowledge that, this week, we finally vanquished one of the world’s great villains. And I for one am thrilled to say good riddance to Katie Couric. (LAUGHTER) (APPLAUSE) (END VIDEO CLIP) MATTHEWS: Wow, one of the great send-ups in TV history, I would say. Greatest evuh? Better than some of Rich Little's fabulous impressions? Or Dana Carvey's? Or Frank Caliendo's? Or Frank Gorshin's? I think not! As for Fey, she shouldn't find Matthews' praise all that flattering. Earlier in the show he said last week was the greatest week ever for the country. The “Hardball” host appeared full of totally meaningless superlatives Monday – amongst other things, that is.

Continue reading …

Title: What Am I Doin’ Hangin’ Round? Artist: The Monkees Tonight calls for an electric banjo. Here are The Monkees covering a tune by Michael Martin Murphy, featuring Mike Nesmith on lead vocals.

Continue reading …
Lawrence O’Donnell: Founding Fathers Would’ve Understood Need to Raise Debt Ceiling

There are times when I watch MSNBC and truly can't understand how a major American television news network could possibly have assembled such a group of ignoramuses to act as commentators. Take for example Lawrence O'Donnell who on Monday's “The Last Word” actually said, “The Founding Fathers would have understood [raising the debt ceiling] would be imperative to maintain the credit rating of the United States of America” (video follows with transcript and commentary): LAWRENCE O’DONNELL, HOST: I don’t know if you could, had a monitor there, you could see who actually appeared at the National Press Club today in Washington, but it is a new low. He appeared in costume as a pretend Founding Father outraged at the notion of raising the debt ceiling which of course the Founding Fathers would have understood would be imperative to maintain the credit rating of the United States of America. Oy! First, credit ratings agencies in America didn't appear until the early 1900s. As such, the Founding Fathers wouldn't have had a clue what a credit rating was. Second, the concept of a debt ceiling wasn't introduced until 1917 when Congress passed the Second Liberty Bond Act. This came somewhat coincident to the creation of our nation's first Treasury paper to fund World War I. Makes you wonder how the Founding Fathers could have had such a definitive opinion about things that wouldn't emerge until more than a century after the Constitution was ratified. Sadly, this is the kind of history regularly taught on MSNBC. And Paul Krugman wonders why voters are so ill-informed.

Continue reading …

If only our “leaders” would understand this, because Dave Johnson is absolutely right: Appealing to the center does drive away voters: Have you heard of the “Moveable Middle?” This is the idea that there are voters on the left who will always vote on the left, and voters on the right, who will always vote on the right, and then there are voters between them who switch back and forth. They are called “swing voters.” So the idea in politics is that in order to win elections you have to take positions that appeal to these voters, and they will “switch” and vote for you instead of for the other side. This is a fundamental mistake. Here is what is very important to understand about the “swing” vote: No voters “switch.” That is the wrong lesson. There are not voters who “swing”; there are left voters and right voters in this middle segment who either show up and vote or do not show up and vote, and this causes this “swing” segment to swing. The lesson to learn: You have to deliver for YOUR part of that swing segment or they don’t show up and vote for you. That is what makes the segment “swing.”

Continue reading …

If only our “leaders” would understand this, because Dave Johnson is absolutely right: Appealing to the center does drive away voters: Have you heard of the “Moveable Middle?” This is the idea that there are voters on the left who will always vote on the left, and voters on the right, who will always vote on the right, and then there are voters between them who switch back and forth. They are called “swing voters.” So the idea in politics is that in order to win elections you have to take positions that appeal to these voters, and they will “switch” and vote for you instead of for the other side. This is a fundamental mistake. Here is what is very important to understand about the “swing” vote: No voters “switch.” That is the wrong lesson. There are not voters who “swing”; there are left voters and right voters in this middle segment who either show up and vote or do not show up and vote, and this causes this “swing” segment to swing. The lesson to learn: You have to deliver for YOUR part of that swing segment or they don’t show up and vote for you. That is what makes the segment “swing.”

Continue reading …
Rare video catches endangered tiger cubs playing in threatened forest

Click here to view this media The World Wildlife Fund released video of several endangered Sumatran tigers playing in a forest that is slated to be cut down. The Associated Press reported : Sumatran tigers are on the brink of extinction because of the destruction of forests, poaching and clashes with humans. Their numbers have dwindled to about 400 from 1,000 in the 1970s, according to the World Wildlife Fund, which set up the cameras in Riau and Jambi provinces just three months ago. Karmila Parakkasi, who heads the group’s tiger research team on Sumatra island, said capturing a dozen cats in such a short period is astonishing.

Continue reading …
Chris Matthews: Last Week Was ‘Best Week Ever For The Country’

What would you say was the best week in American history? If you're a man named Chris Matthews who gets a thrill up his leg for Barack Obama, you would say the week in which Osama bin Laden was killed by a Navy SEAL team in Pakistan (video follows with transcript and commentary): CHRIS MATTHEWS, HOST: Riding high. Let’s play HARDBALL. Good evening. I’m Chris Matthews in Washington. Leading off tonight: Never been better. That’s bin Laden of course. Best week ever, I’d say, for the country. President Obama is coming off the best week of his presidency, certainly. Osama bin Laden’s been got, the economy’s creating jobs, the Republicans look, let’s face it, less and less able to find a presidential hopeful to even give a uniform to, much less put out there on the field. And all that is giving the president a boost in the polls. Our new tonight NBC News/”Wall Street Journal” poll has the president’s job approval up to 52 percent — it’s tough to get higher these days — with just 41 percent disapproving. But that’s our top story tonight. So, killing an unarmed terrorist, the unemployment rate rising to 9 percent, and Republicans seemingly not having a presidential candidate to oppose the current White House resident is what MSNBC's Chris Matthews views as the best week in American history. Maybe I'm a tad biased here, but I would think: the week the Declaration of Independence was signed; the week the Constitution was ratified; the week the Revolutionary War ended; the week the Civil War ended, and; the weeks VE and VJ Days happened would all be far ahead of last week in historical significance. But then again, I'm not in the business of making Barack Obama's presidency a success.

Continue reading …

Disturbing numbers being reported from the housing sector are a reminder that America is in real danger of a Lost-Decade-of-Japan kind of situation if we don’t do something serious about the ground zero of our economic collapse: Wall Street. There are a wide variety of serious long-term issues that we have to deal with in order to reverse the decline of America’s middle class — rebuilding our manufacturing sector and infrastructure, strengthening the labor movement so that middle-class wages begin rising again, breaking up the concentrated economic power in sectors like banking and insurance, and restoring our tax base by making sure wealthy individuals and corporations are paying their fair share would be my top four long-term priorities to achieve this goal — but in the short run, we cannot fix our economy without taking on the big Wall Street banks and making dramatic changes to revive the housing sector. Three different sets of numbers on housing caught my eye this morning: 1. The percentage of homeowners with underwater mortgages — where the value of a mortgage exceeds the value of the property — has now climbed to 28.4 percent. It has been at around a quarter of all (single-family) home mortgages, but is continuing to climb, edging closer to a third. This is a truly stunning number, especially when you consider how many homeowners are in their second or even third decade of paying off their mortgage. 2. Housing prices continue their decline, in fact scoring their biggest quarterly drop since the crash months in 2008 . Home values have declined a net 29.5 percent since their peak in 2006, and after a modest increase after the 2008 crash, started declining again last fall and are now at their lowest level, making them equal to the bottom point of the crash. And analysts expect them to continue to fall for another year at least. 3. A new report out by National People’s Action shows that one out of ten homes in Cleveland, Columbus, and Cinncinnati will have received a foreclosure notice since the housing crisis began. Those are depression-level numbers, and I expect they parallel other hard hit states like MI, FL, and NV. Where the housing crisis is at its worst, we are seeing economic devastation on a massive scale. All of this adds up to terrible news not just in the housing sector but in the rest of our economy as well. Homes represent the No. 1 source of wealth and equity for middle-class Americans, and their best chance for having some kind of decent retirement. Being secure in your home equity makes people far more likely to start a small business, and far more likely to have the confidence to buy the other consumer items that make the economy hum. And home prices are cyclical, in the sense that bad news for your neighbor in terms of a foreclosure usually means bad news for your home value. This is not a dramatic, high-profile issue, but it is a simple fact that until we do something big to solve the housing crisis, this economy is going to stay stagnant. But it can only be done by taking on the banking industry directly. As we learned during the financial crisis, government has a lot of regulatory tools at their disposal, and with passage of last year’s financial reform bill, they now have more. The Treasury Department, the other financial regulatory agencies of federal government, the U.S. Justice Department, the state Attorneys General, state legislators like those in California considering a bill forcing bankers to pay all the costs of foreclosures, all have the power to do far, far more to force bankers to start writing down mortgages and giving some relief to homeowners. Bankers have too much hoarded money, and too much political power. They have had the power to gamble trillions of dollars of other people’s money, buy off the rating agencies, and then get bailouts with no strings attached when everything went south. They have had the power to play fast, loose, and sloppy with hundreds of years of real estate law, and leave homeowners holding the bag. They have had the power to blatantly rip off Main Street businesses and consumers with a swipe fee industry that had no regulation up until last year’s financial reform bill. They have had their way with lawmakers and regulatory agencies of both parties. But if we started standing up to them, we would give a very big boost to this badly damaged economy. Swipe fee regulations and forcing mortgage write downs would pump scores of billions of dollars directly back into our economy, and have a huge multiplier effect. Given that Congress isn’t going to consider any kind of fiscal stimulus, and is in fact pursuing Hoover-style belt tightening policies, taking on the banks is the best economic policy we could have. We are facing some huge long-term issue battles in the coming months. Republicans are trying to do away with Medicare, Medicaid, the safety net, labor unions — basically the entire set of progressive achievements of the 20th Century. Those incredibly important fights are getting all the attention they deserve. But if we don’t do something in the very short term to break the stranglehold the Wall Street banks have on our economy’s throat, the black hole will swallow any prospect for a strong economic recovery.

Continue reading …
One-eyed and patchy – and that’s just the plot

New blood and a quest for the fountain of youth aren’t quite enough to rejuvenate the timber-shivering franchise It’s fitting that this fourth instalment of the mega booty-hauling franchise revolves around a quest for the fountain of youth. Here’s a property that would give its right arm for some rejuvenation, having worn out its welcome last time round, way back in 2007. And having already paid an arm and a leg to persuade Johnny Depp to reprise his Jack Sparrow role, you wouldn’t imagine it had many more limbs to spare. But the logic seems to be, if you’re splashing out on your star, you’d better make a splash with the rest of the movie. This splashes so much, its stranger tides almost drown it. It’s a succession of ever-escalating action sequences and grand settings. At first they’re stunning, then they’re routine, then they’re wearying. There is at least some new blood to power this rejuvenation exercise. Depp is his usual mincing self but Orlando Bloom and Keira Knightley have walked the plank when aboard clambers Penélope Cruz, as a duplicitous old flame of Jack’s. Being Cruz, she’s Spanish and feisty, and that’s about it. And fitting right in as the new villain of the piece is Ian McShane’s Blackbeard – a mystically powered captain whose orange, leathery complexion suggests he’s spent long years trapped in a tanning salon. Throw in Geoffrey Rush’s Barbossa (now with a peg leg), and the British and Spanish navies, and you’ve got something close to a piratical wacky races. Everyone’s racing to get to the fountain of youth, negotiating perilous terrain and fantastical episodes and stitching each other up. The freshest new monsters are some vicious but seductive mermaids, which are rather cruelly hunted, slaughtered and tortured along the way. That could traumatise a few younger viewers but being just about the only other women in the movie apart from Cruz, it also suggests something more worrying beneath the light-hearted mateyness. Worse still, everyone else is so scheming and self-centred and double-crossing, it’s not always clear who to root for, who’s in cahoots with whom, or what anyone’s going to do if/when they actually find the sacred fountain. The only virtuous role model is a hunky clergyman, played by Sam Claflin. In terms of visual spectacle, it almost goes without saying the film fitfully delivers. There are vertiginous 3D swoops up and down ships, in and out of water and over jungles, and some of the action is ingeniously choreographed. The early scenes in 18th century London are particularly enjoyable, with Richard Griffiths as a delectably piggy George II, and Depp staging a thrilling escape on ropes and horse-drawn carriages. But no sooner has one set piece ended, we’re thrown into another one. In the brief moments of downtime there’s some enjoyable comedy and even some useful dialogue but it’s soon drowned out by another chase or swordfight or race to get some thing that will help them get another thing or stop someone else getting the thing they want. As previous franchise-resuscitation attempts have shown (Indiana Jones, Die Hard, Rambo, Shrek, etc), it’s difficult to come back with a part four after a long absence. The temptation to do something fresh is often outweighed by the fear of losing whatever it was that made it successful in the first place. This tries to do both, but ends up just trying too hard. On general release from 18 May Rating: 2/5 Johnny Depp Penélope Cruz Geoffrey Rush Steve Rose guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …