Six girls aged between 12 and 18 receive 10 lashes each for attacking head of orphanage Six orphan girls aged between 12 and 18 have been flogged in Saudi Arabia after being convicted of attacking the head of their orphanage, an official said. The girls received 10 lashes each at a women’s prison in Medina, Islam’s second holiest city. “The order against the six orphans is a legitimate court order,” Mohammed al-Awadh, the public relations manager at the ministry of social affairs, told Reuters. “The ministry does not have the right to interfere in a court order.” He gave no details of the ruling but the Arabic-language newspaper Okaz said the girls had been convicted of “acts of mischief” and attacking the director of the orphanage. The girls defended their actions, saying they were harassed by the director, Okaz reported. International human rights groups have criticised the Saudi justice system for applying corporal punishment for petty crimes, as well as limb amputations for thieves and beheadings for murderers under its strict interpretation of Islamic law. Saudi officials say the practice is widely approved by Saudi society and is a deterrent to crime. In January 2010 a teenage girl was sentenced to 90 lashes and two months in prison for hitting her school principal on the head with a cup when she took away her mobile phone. Awadh said the ministry would continue to care for the girls after the floggings were carried out. “What it will do is rehabilitate and take care of the girls’ social wellbeing, which is part of its duties and responsibilities.” Saudi Arabia Middle East guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Social work leaders say reforms proposed by Munro to free child protection teams from central control may be threatened by cuts to services Social workers should be freed from excessive bureaucracy and box-ticking to give them more time to do vital face-to-face work with families and at-risk youngsters, according to a major overhaul of child protection. The government-commissioned review of safeguarding practice by Professor Eileen Munro (pdf) recommends that centrally imposed targets and regulations are scrapped, and that children’s social workers are given freedom to exercise their professional skills and judgment. Among its 15 recommendations it calls on ministers to establish a national chief social worker to advise ministers, and says councils should be obliged to ensure “sufficient provision” of early help services such as Sure Start and family support schemes. Munro was commissioned last year by the education secretary, Michael Gove to look at a system he said was too bureaucratic, unaccountable and obsessed with procedures and targets. The report found that safeguarding had indeed become overly dependent on procedures and paperwork, with frontline professionals spending over 60% of their time in front of computer screens. Munro said: “A one-size-fits-all approach is not the right way for child protection services to operate. Top-down government targets and too many forms and procedures are preventing professionals from being able to give children the help they need and assess whether that help has made a difference.” The report says a better balance between guidelines and procedure on one side and professional expertise on the other must be sought: “Helping children is a human process. When the bureaucratic aspects of work become too dominant, the heart of the work is lost.” Social work leaders welcomed the report but warned that the pressures of spending cuts to local authority children’s services at a time when demand on child protection services was rising could make the reforms difficult. Most children’s services in England suffered cuts of between 15% and 25% for 2011-12, with the axe falling most harshly on early help services. The children’s minister Tim Loughton said he welcomed Munro’s “thorough analysis of the problems” but would not formally respond to its recommendations until later in the year. The report’s recomendations include: • Local services should be freed from government targets, national IT systems and regulations, and allowed to design their own services and procedures. • Inspection of safeguarding services should be unnanounced, and should look at all services, including police, health and education, as well as social work. • The government should work with health professionals, such as the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, to ensure that the NHS reforms do not adversely impact on effective safeguarding partnership arrangements. • Every local authority should employ a principal child and family social worker – a senior manager who is still actively involved in frontline work – to report the views of professionals to management. Nushra Mansuri, professional officer for the British Association of Social Workers and the College of Social Work (BASW/CoSW) said: “These recommendations are like music to the profession’s ears. BASW/CoSW has long campaigned to relieve social workers of the unbearable bureaucracy and administrative overload that prevents them working directly with people who need their services and it’s a huge relief that this has come at a time when social workers are under extraordinary added pressure from deep funding cuts.” Matt Dunkley, president of the Association of Directors of Children’s Services, called on ministers to accept the report’s recommendations in full. He warned that the changes would take time and resources to get right, and said the government had to invest extra cash to protect early help services: “If local authorities and their partners are to invest in early help, in developing the workforce and in developing a broader vision for providing help to children and families, central government will need to provide additional funding to make this possible.” Sir Paul Ennals, chief executive of the National Children’s Bureau said: “This report comes out at a time of unprecedented pressure within children’s services. Whilst most authorities have protected social worker posts from their cuts, many services which contribute to keeping children safe are closing. Professor Munro stresses that early help is vital to keeping children safe, and proposes that local authorities should be given a duty to provide early help. This seems like shutting the stable door too late. The funding available for early help has been reduced by 22% since March 2010.” The report insists on the importance of keeping the local authority director of children’s services role, responsible for both schools and children’s social care, and introduced under the last government. It is estimated that around a fifth of council social work departments in England have either diluted the role or added extra responsibilities to it. Child protection Children Social care Public sector cuts Patrick Butler guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …• Railway disputes during Olympics to be referred to Acas • London Underground says this month’s tube strikes off Boris Johnson faces calls to seal a no-strike agreement with the RMT trade union for the 2012 Olympics after Network Rail struck a deal that reduces the threat of industrial action next summer. News of the deal came as London Underground declared that two weeks of walkouts by tube drivers , due to begin next Monday, had been called off. The RMT denied the claim. Network Rail and the RMT have agreed that any industrial dispute that arises during the games will be referred to the Acas conciliation service, with no walkouts taking place during those discussions. Network Rail said: “If there is a dispute, either existing or new, during the timeframe of the Olympics it will automatically be referred to Acas for resolution and no industrial action can be taken whilst we are still negotiating with Acas.” An RMT spokesman denied that the agreement constituted a no-strike deal because it “recognises the continuing right to withdraw labour”. Under the agreement, RMT members carrying out extra shifts during the Olympics and Paralympics between 27 July and 9 September will receive up to £500 in additional pay. It is understood that the deal applies to about 800 Network Rail staff who will work extra hours during the games. In a further deal that settles a long-running dispute with signallers and clerical staff, about 10,000 Network Rail employees will receive a 5.2% pay rise this year – 0.5% above inflation – with a further pay rise of RPI plus 5% next year. Bob Crow, the RMT general secretary, said: “The package recognises the important role that transport workers will be expected to play during the games and rewards them financially while protecting their union rights at the same time. At this time of austerity we think that £500 extra payments and 10% on the basic represents a good deal and proves that strong union organisation can deliver for the members.” The Network Rail deal triggered calls for a similar arrangement at Transport for London, with the tube network expected to bear much of the strain of millions more journeys during the games period. Caroline Pidgeon, chair of the London assembly transport committee, said: “They are going to have to come up with something for the Olympic Games. We cannot have disruption when we have the world looking at us.” Johnson, the London mayor, has said he will not meet Crow while TfL is in dispute with the RMT. The two have yet to meet because the union has been in some form of dispute with TfL since Johnson was elected. Johnson has urged the government to consider legislation that would limit strikes by barring any walkout not backed by a vote in which more than 50% of the workforce took part. The mayor reiterated his demands last week after RMT-affiliated tube drivers voted for two weeks of walkouts over the sacking of two drivers. London Underground said the action had cancelled after TfL reinstated one of the drivers in the wake of an employment tribunal . Eamonn Lynch, a Bakerloo line driver fired for breaching safety guidelines, was found to have been unfairly dismissed. He will return to TfL in a “non-driver role”, TfL said. Mike Brown, head of London Underground, said: “As we’ve always said, there are established mechanisms in place to deal with individual disputes, and that is the process that has been followed here. Following a meeting with the RMT leadership this morning the RMT have withdrawn their threat of industrial action, and we have avoided significant disruption for London.” RMT denied that the walkouts had been called off. “The strike action in the victimisations dispute on London Underground has not been called off,” said a union spokesman. “We have not received confirmation of any potential offer from London Underground as a consequence of earlier talks. If and when any written confirmation of any offer is received it will be considered by our executive and a statement will be issued by the RMT.” Rail transport London Transport Trade unions Boris Johnson London politics Olympic Games 2012 Dan Milmo guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Jack Cafferty almost pretends here that Donald Trump was ever a serious presidential candidate for 2012 and asks if there’s any doubt that he doesn’t have a chance in hell of winning after the thumping he took at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner last weekend by President Obama and SNL’s Seth Meyers . I’m still just thoroughly disgusted with the media for the coverage the man got leading up to his skewering at the WHCD. Maybe a better question for Cafferty would be is the media done finally propping this grifter up which they never should have done in the first place? Since they’re still propping Mr. Noun and a Verb and 9-11 Rudy pootie as somehow serious as well … again, I don’t have much hope for when it will stop. I think we need a new name for the embarrassingly large number of potential GOP candidates that are pretending they might run but are never going to and just want to line their pockets in the process. Maybe something like Grifterpalooza. Thoughts welcomed on that one. From The Cafferty File — Is a presidential run already over for Trump? : The morning after his TV show “Celebrity Apprentice” was interrupted by the breaking news that Osama bin Laden had been killed, Donald Trump released a statement congratulating President Obama and calling for an end to party politics for “the next several days.” He has been uncharacteristically quiet since, especially for a guy who spent weeks adding fuel to the “birther” controversy, badgering the president on a number of issues and tiptoeing around talk of his own presidential run in 2012. Chances are Trump has been quiet, in part, because he is still smarting from the White House Correspondents’ dinner two Saturdays ago. President Obama and the evening’s emcee, “Saturday Night Live’s” Seth Myers, separately skewered Trump at the gala event with a series of jokes on everything from his lack of political experience to his hair. It was a world class beatdown, and by the look on his face – Trump was there– he didn’t take the jokes very well. But luckily for him, the news on bin Laden limited that embarrassment quickly. Last week Trump announced he was pulling out of an appearance to drive the Indianapolis 500 pace car at the upcoming race on May 29th. Trump said it wouldn’t be appropriate for the spotlight to be on him during the race’s 100th anniversary if he had a possible presidential run on his mind. It may be the first time in recorded history that Donald Trump declined the spotlight. Then there’s this: According to a CNN Opinion Research poll, 57 percent of Americans say Trump is tough enough to handle a crisis in this country and 51 percent say he can get the economy back on its feet. But only 37 percent say Trump can manage the government. And only about one-third says he’s honest and trustworthy. These poll numbers are as dismal as his chances of being elected. Here’s my question to you: Is a presidential run already over for Donald Trump? H.J. in St. Paul, Minnesota: When Obama made a public spectacle of him, he was finished. The guy is a joke. Once someone called him out, he was going to be done. I mean he took credit for insulting the president into showing a non-necessary piece of identification. What a chump. Tom in Texas: It was over before he started, and everyone knew it but him. However, I am still hoping he will be the Republican candidate because there will be no one easier to beat. Paul in New Port Richey, Florida: Trump didn’t get where he is by throwing in the towel when things got a little tough. I like his in-your-face, no-nonsense style. It’s too soon to count him out. Carol in Northampton, Massachusetts: Did you see the White House Correspondents’ Dinner? Trump left despondent, but the look on his wife’s face said it all. It was over that night. And that was before Obama got Osama. Donald in Burkesville, Kentucky: I seriously doubt that Obama is worried about running against Trump. If Trump could somehow win the Republican nomination, Obama’s 2012 victory would be the biggest landslide in history. On the other hand, Trump could just do enough damage to any other prospective GOP candidate that the end result would be the same. Personally, I believe Trump is an Obama supporter in disguise and will disrupt the GOP efforts in 2012, thus being President Obama’s Trump-card. Steve in New York: Obviously the press has already destroyed him. Left-wingers have spoken. Even though Trump is right in everything he has said, the press doesn’t like the way he said it. There you go: That’s how we pick our presidents in this country. Josh in New York, New York: Trump for President? Fuggedaboutit! I was hoping he’d last longer, just because I like a good laugh. The idea of his candidacy was preposterous from the start. He makes Sarah Palin look like the thinking voter’s candidate. Donald Trump’s enduring contribution to society is the fact that he is the living embodiment of the notion that “money doesn’t buy class.”
Continue reading …enlarge I knew our country was in trouble when we started hiring history teachers on the basis of what sport they could coach, and not on the basis of the ability to inspire students. My kids’ history teachers were a succession of authoritarian, right-wing coaches, much to my dismay. I thought it was just our school district, but the more I talked to other people, the more I heard the same complaint: Fewer than half of American eighth graders knew the purpose of the Bill of Rights on the most recent national civics examination, and only one in 10 demonstrated acceptable knowledge of the checks and balances among the legislative, executive and judicial branches, according to test results released on Wednesday. At the same time, three-quarters of high school seniors who took the test, the National Assessment of Educational Progress, were unable to demonstrate skills like identifying the effect of United States foreign policy on other nations or naming a power granted to Congress by the Constitution. “Today’s NAEP results confirm that we have a crisis on our hands when it comes to civics education,” said Sandra Day O’Connor, the former Supreme Court justice, who last year founded icivics.org, a nonprofit group that teaches students civics through Web-based games and other tools. The Department of Education administered the test, known as the nation’s report card, to 27,000 4th-, 8th- and 12th-grade students last year. Questions covered themes like how government is financed, what rights are protected by the Constitution and how laws are passed.
Continue reading …Co-operative Energy will offer a single variable tariff in a bid to simplify a ‘baffling and bewildering’ market The Co-operative has entered the energy market with a simple, single tariff designed to be consistently fair and competitive. The Pioneer tariff, named after the Rochdale pioneers who founded the first co-operative in 1844 , has a variable rate and no penalties for switching to a different provider. Co-operative Energy also promises that new customers will not receive preferential treatment over existing customers with cheaper price offers. The company describes the multi-tariff offerings of other energy providers as “baffling and bewildering”, and says it will challenge the big profits made by the other companies by including a twice-yearly profit-sharing deal for all its customers, who will own the business. Electricity will be sourced from low-carbon generators, including from renewable energy sources such as wind and hydro, and the Co-op’s aim is for the carbon content of its electricity to be less than half the national average by April 2012. Co-operative Energy’s Nigel Mason said: “It is time this industry had a radical shake up. Customers have been bamboozled by complicated tariffs and confused by changing prices and unfair contracts, and it has to stop. “We are determined to provide a fair and transparent service for Co-operative Energy customers and to let them share in the profits. We are campaigning for long-overdue reform in the energy industry.” The Co-op says the big six providers rely on customers not knowing how much they are paying for their energy. According to research carried out by Consumer Focus in 2010, 57% of electricity and 59% of gas users do not know how much they pay per unit. The Co-operative Energy website has a price comparison tool so customers can compare their current energy costs with those of the Co-op. Joe Malinowski, founder of energy comparison website TheEnergyShop.com , welcomed the Co-op’s entrance into the market, particularly as it is offering its own products rather than white labelled versions of the big six providers. “On price it is not the cheapest – and it is not likely to get much business via the comparison websites – but it is a sensible long-term price for those who are unlikely to keep an eye on how much they are paying.” An average user buying gas and electricity from the Co-op on a monthly direct debit basis will pay £1,023 based on today’s prices, compared to an average of £1,041 across all variable rate tariffs, according to TheEnergyShop. Malinowski particularly liked the deal’s single unit price: “There’s a serious risk that people might actually understand what they are paying for their energy.” The Co-op’s move follows the scrapping of the market’s cheapest variable rate deal, WebSaver 11 by British Gas, while npower withdrew the cheapest fixed-rate deal, Go Fix 5, and replaced it with one 4.2% more expensive, according to price comparison site Energyhelpline.com . It predicted that prices could rise by 15% by the autumn and Mark Todd, director of the website, said: “The cheaper deals are being pulled so quickly it is difficult to keep up. “Over the past month there has been a bonfire of some of the best deals on the market. The outlook is very bleak and consumers need to act quickly if they want to snap up the cheapest deals or opt for a fixed-rate tariff which will protect them from further price rises.” Energyhelpline currently recommends fixed-rate deals such as EDF’s Fixed S@ver v2 , which is fixed until October 2012. Energy bills Household bills Consumer affairs Utilities Jill Insley guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Self-taught seismologist Raffaele Bendandi never predicted an 11 May quake, but workers and schoolchildren are taking day off Well, so much for the Eternal city. On Wednesday, Rome will be razed to the ground by an earthquake that will shatter more than 2,000 years’ worth of monumental architecture including the Colosseum, the Pantheon and St Peter’s. That, at least, is the fear of hundreds of thousands of Romans, spooked by the reputed forecast of a self-taught seismologist who died more than 30 years ago. The daily La Repubblica reported that applications from the capital’s public employees for a day off – and, presumably, out – were 18% higher than for the same day in 2011. Education officials were said to be expecting school attendances to be down by a fifth as parents decide it is better to be on the safe side. The panic was set off by claims that Raffaele Bendandi, the “earthquake prophet”, forecast a devastating tremor that would rip through the capital on 11 May. Bendandi, who was knighted by Mussolini, is said to have predicted several disasters, including the Friuli quake of 1976, which claimed almost 1,000 lives. Reports of his forecast have gained credence from the awesome rumour-mongering capabilities of the internet; the fact that Rome is undeniably on the edge of a seismic region, and the lingering recollection that a non-specialist predicted the earthquake that devastated the central Italian city of L’Aquila two years ago. But, according to the head of a foundation set up in Bendandi’s honour in his native town near Bologna, it is all an urban – indeed, very urban – legend. “I can state with absolute certainty that in Raffaele Bendandi’s papers, there is no prediction of a earthquake in Rome on 11 May 2011,” Paola Lagorio, the president of the Osservatorio Geoficico Comunale of Faenza, said last month. “The date is not there. The place is not there.” Italy Geology Natural disasters and extreme weather Europe John Hooper guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Takeover of internet phone service is tech giant’s biggest ever deal Microsoft confirmed on Tuesday it has agreed an $8.5bn (£5bn) cash deal to buy internet telephony service Skype, the biggest deal in its 36-year history. The acquisition will see Skype established as a separate business division inside Microsoft, dubbed Microsoft Skype, alongside XBox Live, Kinect and Windows Phone. Tony Bates, the Skype chief executive, will become president of Microsoft Skype and report directly to the technology giant’s chief executive, Steve Ballmer. “Skype is a phenomenal service that is loved by millions of people around the world,” said Ballmer. “Together we will create the future of real-time communications so people can easily stay connected to family, friends, clients and colleagues anywhere in the world. “Tony Bates has a great track record as a leader and will strengthen the Microsoft management team. I’m looking forward to Skype’s talented global workforce bringing its insights, ideas and experience to Microsoft.” Bates added: “Microsoft and Skype share the vision of bringing software innovation and products to our customers. Together, we will be able to accelerate Skype’s plans to extend our global community and introduce new ways for everyone to communicate and collaborate. The acquisition is subject to US regulatory approval, which the companies hope to secure later this year. More details soon… •
Continue reading …Takeover of internet phone service is tech giant’s biggest ever deal Microsoft confirmed on Tuesday it has agreed an $8.5bn (£5bn) cash deal to buy internet telephony service Skype, the biggest deal in its 36-year history. The acquisition will see Skype established as a separate business division inside Microsoft, dubbed Microsoft Skype, alongside XBox Live, Kinect and Windows Phone. Tony Bates, the Skype chief executive, will become president of Microsoft Skype and report directly to the technology giant’s chief executive, Steve Ballmer. “Skype is a phenomenal service that is loved by millions of people around the world,” said Ballmer. “Together we will create the future of real-time communications so people can easily stay connected to family, friends, clients and colleagues anywhere in the world. “Tony Bates has a great track record as a leader and will strengthen the Microsoft management team. I’m looking forward to Skype’s talented global workforce bringing its insights, ideas and experience to Microsoft.” Bates added: “Microsoft and Skype share the vision of bringing software innovation and products to our customers. Together, we will be able to accelerate Skype’s plans to extend our global community and introduce new ways for everyone to communicate and collaborate. The acquisition is subject to US regulatory approval, which the companies hope to secure later this year. More details soon… •
Continue reading …