Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 1147)
Donald Trump’s unbelievable candidacy: Its 15 seconds are just about up

Click here to view this media It’s incredible. Unbelievable. That Trump presidential bid is going big, baby — as in the biggest, fastest collapse of a candidacy in history. Oh yeah. From Public Policy Polling : Donald Trump has had one of the quickest rises and falls in the history of Presidential politics. Last month we found him leading the Republican field with 26%. In the space of just four weeks he’s dropped all the way down to 8%, putting him in a tie for fifth place with Ron Paul. Mike Huckabee and Mitt Romney are at the top of the GOP race with 19% and 18% respectively. Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin are further back at 13% and 12%, followed by Trump and Paul at 8%, Michele Bachmann at 7%, and Tim Pawlenty at 5%. As Trump got more and more exposure over the last month Republicans didn’t just decide they weren’t interested in having him as their nominee- they also decided they flat don’t like him. Only 34% of GOP voters now have a favorable opinion of Trump to 53% who view him in a negative light. Maybe this is why Trump was on Fox last night with Martha MacCallum and complained bitterly about how he’s being treated in the press. Apparently, it’s bad for the country to criticize great leaders like Donald Trump, even when they make utter buffoons of themselves by trumpeting easily disproven conspiracy theories: MACCALLUM: …You know, when you go home at night and you talk to your wife and you think about all this, how does get — this hammering, in your words, how does that get factored into the decision? TRUMP: Well, I think it’s very bad for the country. And it doesn’t affect my decision because I think I have a pretty thick skin. But I think it’s very bad for the country because the kind of people — and I’m not talking about myself, I’m talking about generally speaking. The kind of person you need to run this country has to be somebody that really has accomplished a lot because he’s got to accomplish — he or she has to accomplish a lot for the country. The guy is so completely out to lunch that his Republican fans are fleeing him in droves. Ah, Donald, we hardly knew ye. Because there was so little to know. Makes you wonder why the hell Trump got trotted out for public consumption in the first place. And then I remembered: He was always a stalking horse who’d make the rest of the Republican presidential field look sane and intelligent by comparison . That, and he had one other good use. Eric Boehlert caught this one a couple of weeks ago, when Andrea Tantaros told some accidental truth on O’Reilly’s show: Click here to view this media Let the man speak. He’s got a bigger megaphone than Romney, Pawlenty, Gingrich, than all of them combined. And you know what; he can drive up Obama’s negatives more than any of the other of those GOP candidates. Sure. He can self-immolate like the flaming gasbag he is on his own good time. But what he may have done instead is accidentally drive up Obama’s positives: They got one look at a real comparison between the two men last week, and it wasn’t even a contest.

Continue reading …
Careless driving crackdown ‘will be ignored by motorists’

RAC say because there aren’t enough police on the road, 2003 ban on using phones while driving has been flouted by drivers Motoring organisations have warned that a crackdown on careless driving including £100 fines for offences such as tailgating and weaving through traffic could be flouted by reckless car owners due to a lack of roadside police officers. The RAC said a ban on using mobile phones while driving, introduced in 2003, is ignored by motorists who believe there are not enough police on the roads to enforce it – raising fears that the same will happen to the latest changes. In a move timed to coincide with the launch of the United Nations Decade of Action for Road Safety, the government announced that careless drivers would be handed fixed penalty notices of between £80 and £100 plus a three-point penalty on their licences, or sent on retraining courses in order to avoid “kneejerk” punishment of inadvertent mistakes. Under the current regimes, all careless driving cases have to go to court and as a consequence convictions have plummeted over the past two decades. Adrian Tink, the RAC’s motoring strategist, said: “Will it be any different to the mobile phone laws that are flouted every day by people who simply don’t believe they’ll get caught? Without high profile enforcement it will likely remain just a good idea on paper.” Edmund King, president of the AA, said reductions in traffic police numbers over the decade had already given an advantage to bad drivers. “Enforcement will be a real issue because in the last decade there has been a reduction in dedicated traffic officers of about 1,500 people and police budgets across the country are being cut by about 20%. So it will be difficult for extra enforcement to be carried out by the police.” The transport secretary, Philip Hammond, said the changes would free up police resources by allowing officers to focus more on serious driving offences, because it is hoped that careless driving will now be tackled more effectively. “I believe that focusing police resources on the most dangerous group of drivers will make a difference to road safety outcomes.” In 2009 2,222 people were killed on UK roads, a fall of 12% on the previous year. Currently, police are dissuaded from taking action on careless driving because it is a time-consuming process. He added that allocating officers to enforcing the new rules would be down to local chief constables and could be deferred ultimately to elected police and crime commissioners. King said people were more likely to divert police resources to more high-profile crimes. “If you have got a public that is concerned about violent crime or aggressive burglaries those crimes will always be prioritised over tailgating on adjacent motorways.” Nonetheless, King said the proposals contained welcome elements including a commitment to re-educate rather than punish drivers who commited errors but were not reckless. Maria Eagle, the shadow transport secretary, said spending cuts posed a greater threat to road safety. Labour claims that 12,500 police officer posts will go in England and Wales over the next four years, while road safety funding has been cut by 40%. “The Tory-led government’s reckless decision to axe road safety funding, cut the frontline police officers needed to enforce traffic offences and abandon targets risks more deaths and injuries on Britain’s roads,” she said. However, Hammond’s announcement was welcomed by senior officers who said officers struggled to find the time in courts to prosecute careless driving offences. Additional measures in the new road safety strategy include retests for disqualified offenders before they regain their licence, an end to the right to request blood tests rather than breath tests for drink-driving, seizures of vehicles belonging to the most dangerous offenders, a post-test qualification for new drivers to encourage lower insurance premiums and the offer of educational courses instead of points on a licence for minor offences. Other elements will revolve around a new crackdown on driving while under the influence of drugs, an increase in the range of educational courses for lower level offence and the abolition of loopholes that allow drink drivers to get off without charge. The current Pass Plus scheme for novice drivers will also be replaced with a new qualification – including an assessment – in an attempt to encourage insurers to lower premiums. Road transport Transport policy Transport Dan Milmo Ben Quinn guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Al-Qaida leader warns of ‘worse to come’ in eulogy to Bin Laden

‘What you will be facing is more intense harmful’ says head of al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula The leader of al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) has vowed to fight on after the killing of Osama bin Laden saying “what is coming is greater and worse” in a statement posted on the internet. “You have to fight one generation after the other, until your life is ruined, your days are disturbed and you face disgrace. The fight between us and you was not led by Osama alone,” said Nasser al-Wuhayshi, addressing al-Qaida’s enemies. “What is coming is greater and worse, and what you will be facing is more intense and harmful,” said Wuhayshi in a eulogy to Bin Laden posted on the Islamist militant website As-Ansar . Yemen-based AQAP is seen as one of al-Qaida’s most aggressive regional wings. It has staged several foiled strikes on US and Saudi targets. US forces killed Bin Laden in a raid on his hideout in Pakistan last week, nearly 10 years after the 9/11 attacks. Wuhayshi, another top target for US forces, was a close personal aide to Bin Laden in Afghanistan in the 1990s, and he stuck closely to the leader’s ideology and operational tactics. He wrote: “The Americans killed the sheikh but have they killed the faith of the sheikh, his methodology and his call, and the combat morale of the ummah the sheikh has revived?” Analysts have said AQAP may organise revenge attacks for Bin Laden’s death. AQAP has claimed responsibility for a foiled 2009 attempt to blow up a Detroit-bound plane. It was also blamed for bombs found in cargo en route to the United States in 2010. “Tell the Americans that the ember of jihad is glowing stronger and brighter than it was during the life of the Sheikh,” Wuhayshi said. Impoverished Yemen has been rocked by nearly three months of protests against President Ali Abdullah Saleh’s 32-year rule. Washington and Gulf states including Saudi Arabia are eager to negotiate a power transfer deal because if the country collapses it could give AQAP more room to operate. On Saturday a Yemeni tribal source said that Anwar al-Awlaki, a prominent US-born al-Qaida activist known for encouraging attacks on the United States, was not hit by a US drone attack that killed two middle-ranking al-Qaida leaders in Yemen last week. al-Qaida Global terrorism Osama bin Laden Yemen Middle East guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Hardest Hit: Disabled people march in London – live coverage

Live coverage from the capital as an expected 5,000-10,000 disabled people protest on the Hardest Hit march against cuts to benefits and services 3.01pm: Karen McVeigh is now at the Methodist Central Hall with some of the protesters who are waiting to meet their MPs (others are meeting theirs in Westminster Hall). The organisers of the march are putting the number of protesters at 5,000, while the police are estimating 2,000-3,000. The organisers say some 2,000 people signed up to meet their MPs today, but not all of these have been able to make it. 2.37pm: The Press Association news agency has just filed a report on the march. PA says there were “thousands” of demonstrators, some in wheelchairs and some with guide dogs. The news agency notes: A series of protests are being held this week against the new work capability assessments which campaigners say have seen thousands of people, some with serious health conditions, denied benefits. PA says some of the marchers chanted: “We need support, we need care, don’t take away our welfare”, and carried placards saying: “Leave DLA [disability living allowance] alone; it’s already hard to be ill.” Liam Byrne, the shadow work and pensions secretary, told the marchers: Tell people what it means to cut 20% off the benefits for disabled people and find out how to do it later, and to make disabled people prisoners in their own homes. These changes are cruel and they must change. We have been tabling amendment after amendment that shows this government how they can do things differently, and day after day they have joined forces to defeat us. With passion, conviction and determination we can change this bill for the better, and give people in this country their rights to a full and independent life. Jane Asher, the actress and activist, told the rally: This is the largest rally of disabled people in living memory, and that’s something to be proud of; at the same time, it is very sad that it has come to this. The prime minister said that the savings would protect the vulnerable. Far from protecting the vulnerable, these cuts are bearing down disproportionately on those with disability. People with disability are being hit from all sides. I am calling on the government, with all of you, to put a stop to these cuts; they are cruel, they are misguided, and they are badly drafted. 2.28pm: The BBC News channel is covering the march now. “Already we are seeing many disabled people who are ending up back in institutional care,” one marcher, in a wheelchair, told the channel. Maria Miller (left), the minister for the disabled, was interviewed, and said it was not right that the UK had a benefits system where there are more alcoholics and drug addicts in receipt of disability living allowance than the blind. 2.20pm: Karen McVeigh has been speaking to actor Julie Fernandez (left), best-known for playing Brenda in The Office. She said it was difficult for disabled people to find work as they were discriminated against. She said: The government want to get people into employment in principle but we are living in a recession and the business community don’t see disabled people as viable employees. They see us as people who are going to be taking time off sick or who aren’t intelligent enough. The government are bashing disabled people over the head with these changes to benefits but they should be making the business community employ disabled people. They should stop penalising disable people and start making the business community and public transport more accessible. Fernandez, 37, from Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, said the film and TV industry was “incredibly discriminatory” as it was still seen as acceptable to have able-bodied actors playing disabled characters. She is setting up her own business, a craft shop, to bring in a second income, and said that she was able to claim access to work benefit, which enables her to employ a PA and driver, Lynsey Walton. Fernandez said: Lynsey is my body. If I didn’t have Lynsey I wouldn’t be able to work. By getting the benefit, I’m a taxpayer and Lynsey is a tax payer. There are millions of people across the UK with permanent disabilities. They need to be supported they don’t need to be living in fear of having their benefits taken away. 2.16pm: Here’s a picture of Sally Bercow, the wife of the Speaker of the Commons, and Jane Asher, the actress and activist, on the march today: _ 2.02pm: The Public and Commercial Services union has sent me an email about the march. Members of the PCS joined the protesters, and the union focused on planned cuts to the Equality and Human Rights Commission, which covers discrimination based on disability. Employees walked out for one hour today in protest. A PCS spokesman said: This financial mess was created by bankers and to make the vulnerable pay for a crisis they did not cause the government is cutting lifelines like the Equality and Human Rights Commission’s helpline and slashing the independent living allowance, disability living allowance and employment support allowance … [This] will mean disabled people will be forced to retreat back into their homes, and become entrenched in poverty … The government has received a powerful message from today’s marchers that people are prepared to stand up in defence of benefits and services for the most vulnerable people. 1.54pm: Labour activist Stewart Owadally paints a vivid picture of the march : _ 1.30pm: Karen McVeigh has been talking to more marchers. Mary Carr, 46, a public sector worker from Nottingham who has mental health issues, was carrying a black coffin with the words “disability equality” written on the side. Despite having a fear of crowds she was keen to protest against the government, which she said was “demonising disabled people”. Carr said: “I’m fortunate in that I can hold down a job. I have access to work support and the government pays for taxis to take me to work. They haven’t cut that but the warning signs are there. A lot of my disabled colleagues have lost their jobs because in public services they are targeting local offices and disabled people can’t travel to get to other places. We signed up to the European convention for people with disabilities but if you go through the effects of the cuts – transport, education, housing, all the rights I have to take part in society are being eroded. It’s the poor and disabled who are more reliant on the public sector.” 1.12pm: On Twitter, hotcrossbunny sums up how many demonstrators and commenters below the line here seem to be feeling about the lack of media coverage of the march. _ 1.07pm: Karen McVeigh sends more from the march: Aileen Feasey, 52, from near Bodmin, Cornwall, came to London with her sons Andrew, 24, and Alastair, 19, on the overnight sleeper last night. Feasey said that she is marching for the rights of people like Andrew, who has down’s syndrome, to lead an independent life. Since 2009 he has one day a week in a work placement scheme as a general assistant in a leisure centre 15 miles away. But last month, she was told that his transport costs would no longer be paid by the council. He is now unable to go. Feasey said: “All we’ve fought for all Andrew’s life is going backwards. Without transport he is a prisoner in his own home. He doesn’t understand why he can’t go. He gets his leisure centre T-shirt on on Mondays and it’s very difficult to explain to him. We live in Cornwall; it’s a 40 mile round trip anywhere.” Andrew used to get £55 mobility allowance, which is being cut. “He used to go to the theatre group, college a couple of days a week. But he’s unable to contribute to his transport costs. It’s unfair and it feels unlawful to charge his benefits against transport.” Feasey, who is self-employed, was planning to go to university, but does not know if she now can. “I’ve cared for him for 24 years, to be an independent young man. But our lives have been turned upside down by this cut.” 1.02pm: Karen McVeigh has just called with news of the speakers at the march. Liam Byrne, the shadow work and pensions secretary, who handed the government its “no money left” line when he left office, said he thought it was more important to be out with the marchers than listening to David Cameron at prime minister’s questions. Mark Harrison, the chief executive of the Coalition of Disabled People, commenting on the absence of Maria Miller, the minister for disabled people, called for a vote of no confidence in her and said she was now “the minister against disabled people”. “All those in favour … ” he said, prompting a big cheer from the demonstrators. “All those against … ” Silence. “That’s unanimous,” Harrison concluded. 12.52pm: The march is on, Lucy Glennon reports: “A bus full of tourists on a tour are cheering us on as we move along. Hopefully they understand the purpose of the march. Hope people in parliament can hear us and will make an effort to see us; many are struggling to walk.” 12.43pm: Margaret Curran, the shadow disabled minister , has tweeted that she is on the march and calls it a “unanimous vote of no confidence” for her opposite number in the government: _ 12.31pm: Lucy Glennon , one of the marchers ( see 9.37am ), sends this update: Thousands here already. So many different people with many different conditions. A lot more assistance dogs than I anticipated. Users of motorised wheelchairs and scooters are politely letting one another through like organised traffic. People feel quite passionate already. The marchers from Mind have clappers. Great atmosphere already. Would recommend people come down now if they still want to. 12.20pm: My colleagues on the video desk have produced this film of disabled people campaigning at the headquarters of Atos Origin, the company employed by the government to assess whether or not they are fit to work. _ 12.16pm: Over on the NHS live blog , my colleagues Randeep Ramesh and Rowenna Davis are hosting a web chat from 1pm-2pm with the CEO of the MS Society, Simon Gillespie, and members of Acevo and the Stroke Association answering your questions live. At 4-5pm, a panel of patients and carers for people with long-term and chronic conditions will be discussing how the health reforms might affect them. 12.11pm: My colleague Karen McVeigh has just phoned from the march, where she has been speaking to demonstrators. At Victoria Embankment Richard Hawkes, chief executive of Scope, said that he hoped the march would give disabled people a sense that they are not alone. “Above all it’s really important for the people here today to have a sense of coming together, that there are a lot of people who are interested in the rights of disabled people,” he said. “That is one of the most powerful things for them. There is an unfortunate narrative, a myth that has been perpetuated by certain tabloid newspapers, that there are a lot of benefit scroungers. The government’s own statistics show that less than 2% of people who claim incapacity benefit do so fraudulently. Our experience is that most disabled people want to work. But they need support to do so, to overcome transport issues and other issues related to disability. “There is a combined impact of the reform of the disability living allowance, DLA, the test for incapacity benefit, the removal of the mobility component of DLA for those in residential care, and cuts to local authority support services that have had a huge impact on disabled people. That has led to a lot of disabled people being hugely concerned and hugely worried. We know there’s a deficit but the government has said we’re in it together. Taking away the DLA mobility allowance for people in residential care, which means that they can’t go out, is not a sign that we are in it together.” Sheila Gardiner, 62, from Derbyshire, worked as a bookkeeper until she had a stroke five years ago. She is now unable to walk or transfer from her wheelchair unaided, and lives in a Leonard Cheshire Disability care home. She currently gets £49.85 DLA support each week, which is under threat. “They want to take away my DLA mobility. If they do, I won’t be able to see my daughter Serene graduate from acting school in London. I go to college – I already have an A-level in computing – but I won’t be able to do that either. I have to travel by train or taxi as I can’t transfer from my wheelchair. This is going backwards towards Victorian times when people were either very rich or very poor.” Tony Vanterpool, 53, from Brampton in Cambridgeshire, has been deaf since birth, but had a stroke 11 years ago which left him in a wheelchair and unable to properly use sign language. On his lap was a “lightwriter”, a small typewriter which prints what he is saying. He is helped 10 hours a week by a communication support worker, Jan Smith, who was with him today. Vanterpool said: “I came to campaign with all the disabled people because the government are cutting my mobility allowance. I nee this to go to the deaf club.” Smith explained that where Vanterpool lives in a care home there are no other deaf people, the staff do not sign, and he is unable to speak in sign language. Vanterpool said: “I like going to deaf club. I meet friends there.” Going to the deaf club once a month, which is his only link to similar people, costs £17 round trip, which is paid for by the mobility allowance of the DLA. 11.28am: The Broken of Britain has also posted this video to mark the march, entitled We have a Dream. Despite the crippling debt of the post war years, our grandfathers and grandmothers made sure their dream of a society caring for all was a priority … We refuse to accept a system bailed out by the taxpayer is so bankrupt it can no longer meet it’s obligations to the basic welfare of all people. We refuse to believe in a world which bankers choose to increase bonuses whilst disabled people choose between food and heat. We refuse to believe local authorities deem it right and proper to save money by leaving old ladies overnight in their own urine, we refuse to believe that removing respite care can be right. We refuse to believe that we should be blamed, targeted, made less human by those who sip from the cup of success. _ 11.15am: Yesterday the blog The Broken of Britain addressed the argument that “there is no money left” and so benefits must be cut: There is a lot of money left. The UK is one of the richest nations in the OECD, and the financial crisis has not changed that – it is only that the super-rich … have moved this money where it does not benefit the nation at large. Fourthly, even if there were no money left, we should borrow sensibly – cutting public expenditure dramatically at this time will serve only to reverse economic growth, widening the fiscal deficit. 10.27am: Asked about the march, a spokeswoman for the Department for Work and Pensions said the government’s “commitment to support disabled people to live independent lives will not change”. Every disabled person will still get support, but the benefits system is not working. It’s trapped people on benefits. We want to give people the support to get into the workplace, and that’s what our reforms are all about. We have a raft of support available to do this. We want to reassure people that that won’t change. In a statement, the DWP added: We are reforming welfare to make sure that the billions we spend on benefits goes to those who need it and that for the first time disabled people get proper help and support to live independent lives and work in the mainstream jobs that they want. 10.10am: Amelia Gentleman has been speaking to marchers: Pepe Martinez, 58, arrived by train from Huntingdon, where he’s a resident at a Leonard Cheshire home, hoping that the protest might help persuade the government to rethink its plan to cut disability allowance payments. He’s a Tory voter and hadn’t expected disability benefits to be affected when he voted for the party last year. A former nurse, who spent 35 years caring for others in the NHS, he has been surprised by attitudes towards disabled people since developing a degenerative condition 10 years ago. “I thought we were lucky in Britain; I thought this was a caring nation. Now I don’t think that,” he says. Without the mobility component of DLA, which the government plans to cut, he “won’t be able to be a part of life generally”. He worries he’ll be stuck inside the care home unable to visit friends and family outside. “We’ll be like zombies,” he says. I met Billie Smith, a carer with Leonard Cheshire disability, at King’s Cross station coming in with a small group of demonstrators just after 9am. She has spent the past month making arrangements to help five of the 20 residents at the Manor home in Cambridgeshire get to London for the march. The process has illustrated the enormous difficulties facing disabled people when they use public transport. Since only two wheelchairs are allowed on each First Direct train she had to book residents and carers on three separate trains. She had to give the rail company 24 hours notice of their intention to travel. Arrangements have sucked up most of her time for the past week. But she’s been happy to do it because she also wants to register her protest at today’s march. After 20 years working for the charity, trying to improve conditions, she’s worried that things are taking a step backwards. “If they cut DLA there’s a chance people will become institutionalised again,” she says, shouting over the noise of commuters arriving for work. 9.37am: Good morning. Between 5,000 and 10,000 disabled people are expected to march in London today in a rally against cuts to benefits and services. The Hardest Hit march, organised jointly by the UK Disabled People’s Council and the Disability Benefits Consortium, is expected to be the largest event of its kind for decades. The protesters are voicing their anger at the combined effects of changes to welfare eligibility, cuts to disability living allowance and reductions in council funding for carers and services. In a comment piece in today’s Guardian, Sue Marsh, who blogs at Diary of a Benefit Scrounger , explains more : Sick and disabled people will lose £9bn in vital support over the lifetime of this parliament. That’s a colossal 10% of George Osborne’s entire £89bn deficit reduction plan. Some studies have found that it will cost the disabled a full third of our incomes. Incapacity benefit is being phased out and the much tougher employment support allowance (ESA) is disqualifying 93% of claimants from long-term support. Disability living allowance is being scrapped and replaced with “personal independent payments”, which will disqualify a further 20% of the most severely disabled. In another comment piece, Alice Maynard , the chair of disability charity Scope, adds: The simple fact is that daily life costs more if you are disabled, which means disabled people and their families are more vulnerable to the impact of losing a local service, a wage freeze or seeing their benefits adjusted. Marchers will be addressed by Liam Byrne, the shadow work and pensions secretary. Maria Miller, minister for disabled people, declined an invitation to attend, on the grounds that she needed to be at prime minister’s questions, according to Jaspal Dhani, chief executive of the United Kingdom Disabled People’s Council. My colleagues Amelia Gentleman and Karen McVeigh are with the march and we’ll be hearing from them shortly, and my colleagues from the video desk will be sending footage as soon as possible. Amelia wrote a story about the march in today’s Guardian, which you can read here . Lucy Glennon, who has the rare skin condition epidermolysis bullosa, explained why she was marching today, and we’ll be hearing more from her throughout the day: I’m joining the march today in the hope that it will raise awareness on the cuts and changes to welfare and benefits and how they will significantly impact disabled people. While I understand everyone has to accept some change to their life in order for the country to save money, it is not really appreciated how much more disabled people are going to feel the bite of the cuts, and many are already adapting to changes with difficulty. I have a painful condition, epidermolysis bullosa, and today I am taking part in the march being pushed in my wheelchair by Cynthia Richards, one of the social care managers for DEBRA , the charity that helps people with my condition and works to find a cure. With regard to people with EB, we believe it is wrong that those who are completely unable to walk, including children, could be ticked as being fine to ‘mobilise’ under the proposed changes to Disability Living Allowance, which is being replaced with a much more unfair system of assessment for Personal Independent Payment. It is also wrong that the new assessment for Employment Support Allowance does not give much consideration to pain experienced when doing tasks or walking, when some people with EB are unable to walk without strong opiates, as walking often creates sores and wounds on their feet. It is also unfair that some people with EB have already been told by their local councils not to request more care, no matter how much they need it, as it would put their existing care package under assessment and could result in it stopping completely. Here’s a rough schedule for today : 11.30am onwards: Campaigners gather on Victoria Embankment by Horseguards Avenue. 12-12.30pm: Rally on Victoria Embankment. Speakers include disabled people, MPs and Jane Asher. 12.30pm-1.30pm: March – from Victoria Embankment, along Parliament Square and Millbank, finishing at Dean Stanley Street. 1.30pm-5.30pm: Campaigners meeting their MPs in Westminster Hall. The actress Jane Asher is president of three disability organisations involved in the march: Arthritis Care, National Autistic Society and Parkinson’s UK. You can find the website for the march here . Disability London Protest Welfare Public sector cuts Paul Owen guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Hardest Hit: Disabled people march in London – live coverage

Live coverage from the capital as an expected 5,000-10,000 disabled people protest on the Hardest Hit march against cuts to benefits and services 3.01pm: Karen McVeigh is now at the Methodist Central Hall with some of the protesters who are waiting to meet their MPs (others are meeting theirs in Westminster Hall). The organisers of the march are putting the number of protesters at 5,000, while the police are estimating 2,000-3,000. The organisers say some 2,000 people signed up to meet their MPs today, but not all of these have been able to make it. 2.37pm: The Press Association news agency has just filed a report on the march. PA says there were “thousands” of demonstrators, some in wheelchairs and some with guide dogs. The news agency notes: A series of protests are being held this week against the new work capability assessments which campaigners say have seen thousands of people, some with serious health conditions, denied benefits. PA says some of the marchers chanted: “We need support, we need care, don’t take away our welfare”, and carried placards saying: “Leave DLA [disability living allowance] alone; it’s already hard to be ill.” Liam Byrne, the shadow work and pensions secretary, told the marchers: Tell people what it means to cut 20% off the benefits for disabled people and find out how to do it later, and to make disabled people prisoners in their own homes. These changes are cruel and they must change. We have been tabling amendment after amendment that shows this government how they can do things differently, and day after day they have joined forces to defeat us. With passion, conviction and determination we can change this bill for the better, and give people in this country their rights to a full and independent life. Jane Asher, the actress and activist, told the rally: This is the largest rally of disabled people in living memory, and that’s something to be proud of; at the same time, it is very sad that it has come to this. The prime minister said that the savings would protect the vulnerable. Far from protecting the vulnerable, these cuts are bearing down disproportionately on those with disability. People with disability are being hit from all sides. I am calling on the government, with all of you, to put a stop to these cuts; they are cruel, they are misguided, and they are badly drafted. 2.28pm: The BBC News channel is covering the march now. “Already we are seeing many disabled people who are ending up back in institutional care,” one marcher, in a wheelchair, told the channel. Maria Miller (left), the minister for the disabled, was interviewed, and said it was not right that the UK had a benefits system where there are more alcoholics and drug addicts in receipt of disability living allowance than the blind. 2.20pm: Karen McVeigh has been speaking to actor Julie Fernandez (left), best-known for playing Brenda in The Office. She said it was difficult for disabled people to find work as they were discriminated against. She said: The government want to get people into employment in principle but we are living in a recession and the business community don’t see disabled people as viable employees. They see us as people who are going to be taking time off sick or who aren’t intelligent enough. The government are bashing disabled people over the head with these changes to benefits but they should be making the business community employ disabled people. They should stop penalising disable people and start making the business community and public transport more accessible. Fernandez, 37, from Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, said the film and TV industry was “incredibly discriminatory” as it was still seen as acceptable to have able-bodied actors playing disabled characters. She is setting up her own business, a craft shop, to bring in a second income, and said that she was able to claim access to work benefit, which enables her to employ a PA and driver, Lynsey Walton. Fernandez said: Lynsey is my body. If I didn’t have Lynsey I wouldn’t be able to work. By getting the benefit, I’m a taxpayer and Lynsey is a tax payer. There are millions of people across the UK with permanent disabilities. They need to be supported they don’t need to be living in fear of having their benefits taken away. 2.16pm: Here’s a picture of Sally Bercow, the wife of the Speaker of the Commons, and Jane Asher, the actress and activist, on the march today: _ 2.02pm: The Public and Commercial Services union has sent me an email about the march. Members of the PCS joined the protesters, and the union focused on planned cuts to the Equality and Human Rights Commission, which covers discrimination based on disability. Employees walked out for one hour today in protest. A PCS spokesman said: This financial mess was created by bankers and to make the vulnerable pay for a crisis they did not cause the government is cutting lifelines like the Equality and Human Rights Commission’s helpline and slashing the independent living allowance, disability living allowance and employment support allowance … [This] will mean disabled people will be forced to retreat back into their homes, and become entrenched in poverty … The government has received a powerful message from today’s marchers that people are prepared to stand up in defence of benefits and services for the most vulnerable people. 1.54pm: Labour activist Stewart Owadally paints a vivid picture of the march : _ 1.30pm: Karen McVeigh has been talking to more marchers. Mary Carr, 46, a public sector worker from Nottingham who has mental health issues, was carrying a black coffin with the words “disability equality” written on the side. Despite having a fear of crowds she was keen to protest against the government, which she said was “demonising disabled people”. Carr said: “I’m fortunate in that I can hold down a job. I have access to work support and the government pays for taxis to take me to work. They haven’t cut that but the warning signs are there. A lot of my disabled colleagues have lost their jobs because in public services they are targeting local offices and disabled people can’t travel to get to other places. We signed up to the European convention for people with disabilities but if you go through the effects of the cuts – transport, education, housing, all the rights I have to take part in society are being eroded. It’s the poor and disabled who are more reliant on the public sector.” 1.12pm: On Twitter, hotcrossbunny sums up how many demonstrators and commenters below the line here seem to be feeling about the lack of media coverage of the march. _ 1.07pm: Karen McVeigh sends more from the march: Aileen Feasey, 52, from near Bodmin, Cornwall, came to London with her sons Andrew, 24, and Alastair, 19, on the overnight sleeper last night. Feasey said that she is marching for the rights of people like Andrew, who has down’s syndrome, to lead an independent life. Since 2009 he has one day a week in a work placement scheme as a general assistant in a leisure centre 15 miles away. But last month, she was told that his transport costs would no longer be paid by the council. He is now unable to go. Feasey said: “All we’ve fought for all Andrew’s life is going backwards. Without transport he is a prisoner in his own home. He doesn’t understand why he can’t go. He gets his leisure centre T-shirt on on Mondays and it’s very difficult to explain to him. We live in Cornwall; it’s a 40 mile round trip anywhere.” Andrew used to get £55 mobility allowance, which is being cut. “He used to go to the theatre group, college a couple of days a week. But he’s unable to contribute to his transport costs. It’s unfair and it feels unlawful to charge his benefits against transport.” Feasey, who is self-employed, was planning to go to university, but does not know if she now can. “I’ve cared for him for 24 years, to be an independent young man. But our lives have been turned upside down by this cut.” 1.02pm: Karen McVeigh has just called with news of the speakers at the march. Liam Byrne, the shadow work and pensions secretary, who handed the government its “no money left” line when he left office, said he thought it was more important to be out with the marchers than listening to David Cameron at prime minister’s questions. Mark Harrison, the chief executive of the Coalition of Disabled People, commenting on the absence of Maria Miller, the minister for disabled people, called for a vote of no confidence in her and said she was now “the minister against disabled people”. “All those in favour … ” he said, prompting a big cheer from the demonstrators. “All those against … ” Silence. “That’s unanimous,” Harrison concluded. 12.52pm: The march is on, Lucy Glennon reports: “A bus full of tourists on a tour are cheering us on as we move along. Hopefully they understand the purpose of the march. Hope people in parliament can hear us and will make an effort to see us; many are struggling to walk.” 12.43pm: Margaret Curran, the shadow disabled minister , has tweeted that she is on the march and calls it a “unanimous vote of no confidence” for her opposite number in the government: _ 12.31pm: Lucy Glennon , one of the marchers ( see 9.37am ), sends this update: Thousands here already. So many different people with many different conditions. A lot more assistance dogs than I anticipated. Users of motorised wheelchairs and scooters are politely letting one another through like organised traffic. People feel quite passionate already. The marchers from Mind have clappers. Great atmosphere already. Would recommend people come down now if they still want to. 12.20pm: My colleagues on the video desk have produced this film of disabled people campaigning at the headquarters of Atos Origin, the company employed by the government to assess whether or not they are fit to work. _ 12.16pm: Over on the NHS live blog , my colleagues Randeep Ramesh and Rowenna Davis are hosting a web chat from 1pm-2pm with the CEO of the MS Society, Simon Gillespie, and members of Acevo and the Stroke Association answering your questions live. At 4-5pm, a panel of patients and carers for people with long-term and chronic conditions will be discussing how the health reforms might affect them. 12.11pm: My colleague Karen McVeigh has just phoned from the march, where she has been speaking to demonstrators. At Victoria Embankment Richard Hawkes, chief executive of Scope, said that he hoped the march would give disabled people a sense that they are not alone. “Above all it’s really important for the people here today to have a sense of coming together, that there are a lot of people who are interested in the rights of disabled people,” he said. “That is one of the most powerful things for them. There is an unfortunate narrative, a myth that has been perpetuated by certain tabloid newspapers, that there are a lot of benefit scroungers. The government’s own statistics show that less than 2% of people who claim incapacity benefit do so fraudulently. Our experience is that most disabled people want to work. But they need support to do so, to overcome transport issues and other issues related to disability. “There is a combined impact of the reform of the disability living allowance, DLA, the test for incapacity benefit, the removal of the mobility component of DLA for those in residential care, and cuts to local authority support services that have had a huge impact on disabled people. That has led to a lot of disabled people being hugely concerned and hugely worried. We know there’s a deficit but the government has said we’re in it together. Taking away the DLA mobility allowance for people in residential care, which means that they can’t go out, is not a sign that we are in it together.” Sheila Gardiner, 62, from Derbyshire, worked as a bookkeeper until she had a stroke five years ago. She is now unable to walk or transfer from her wheelchair unaided, and lives in a Leonard Cheshire Disability care home. She currently gets £49.85 DLA support each week, which is under threat. “They want to take away my DLA mobility. If they do, I won’t be able to see my daughter Serene graduate from acting school in London. I go to college – I already have an A-level in computing – but I won’t be able to do that either. I have to travel by train or taxi as I can’t transfer from my wheelchair. This is going backwards towards Victorian times when people were either very rich or very poor.” Tony Vanterpool, 53, from Brampton in Cambridgeshire, has been deaf since birth, but had a stroke 11 years ago which left him in a wheelchair and unable to properly use sign language. On his lap was a “lightwriter”, a small typewriter which prints what he is saying. He is helped 10 hours a week by a communication support worker, Jan Smith, who was with him today. Vanterpool said: “I came to campaign with all the disabled people because the government are cutting my mobility allowance. I nee this to go to the deaf club.” Smith explained that where Vanterpool lives in a care home there are no other deaf people, the staff do not sign, and he is unable to speak in sign language. Vanterpool said: “I like going to deaf club. I meet friends there.” Going to the deaf club once a month, which is his only link to similar people, costs £17 round trip, which is paid for by the mobility allowance of the DLA. 11.28am: The Broken of Britain has also posted this video to mark the march, entitled We have a Dream. Despite the crippling debt of the post war years, our grandfathers and grandmothers made sure their dream of a society caring for all was a priority … We refuse to accept a system bailed out by the taxpayer is so bankrupt it can no longer meet it’s obligations to the basic welfare of all people. We refuse to believe in a world which bankers choose to increase bonuses whilst disabled people choose between food and heat. We refuse to believe local authorities deem it right and proper to save money by leaving old ladies overnight in their own urine, we refuse to believe that removing respite care can be right. We refuse to believe that we should be blamed, targeted, made less human by those who sip from the cup of success. _ 11.15am: Yesterday the blog The Broken of Britain addressed the argument that “there is no money left” and so benefits must be cut: There is a lot of money left. The UK is one of the richest nations in the OECD, and the financial crisis has not changed that – it is only that the super-rich … have moved this money where it does not benefit the nation at large. Fourthly, even if there were no money left, we should borrow sensibly – cutting public expenditure dramatically at this time will serve only to reverse economic growth, widening the fiscal deficit. 10.27am: Asked about the march, a spokeswoman for the Department for Work and Pensions said the government’s “commitment to support disabled people to live independent lives will not change”. Every disabled person will still get support, but the benefits system is not working. It’s trapped people on benefits. We want to give people the support to get into the workplace, and that’s what our reforms are all about. We have a raft of support available to do this. We want to reassure people that that won’t change. In a statement, the DWP added: We are reforming welfare to make sure that the billions we spend on benefits goes to those who need it and that for the first time disabled people get proper help and support to live independent lives and work in the mainstream jobs that they want. 10.10am: Amelia Gentleman has been speaking to marchers: Pepe Martinez, 58, arrived by train from Huntingdon, where he’s a resident at a Leonard Cheshire home, hoping that the protest might help persuade the government to rethink its plan to cut disability allowance payments. He’s a Tory voter and hadn’t expected disability benefits to be affected when he voted for the party last year. A former nurse, who spent 35 years caring for others in the NHS, he has been surprised by attitudes towards disabled people since developing a degenerative condition 10 years ago. “I thought we were lucky in Britain; I thought this was a caring nation. Now I don’t think that,” he says. Without the mobility component of DLA, which the government plans to cut, he “won’t be able to be a part of life generally”. He worries he’ll be stuck inside the care home unable to visit friends and family outside. “We’ll be like zombies,” he says. I met Billie Smith, a carer with Leonard Cheshire disability, at King’s Cross station coming in with a small group of demonstrators just after 9am. She has spent the past month making arrangements to help five of the 20 residents at the Manor home in Cambridgeshire get to London for the march. The process has illustrated the enormous difficulties facing disabled people when they use public transport. Since only two wheelchairs are allowed on each First Direct train she had to book residents and carers on three separate trains. She had to give the rail company 24 hours notice of their intention to travel. Arrangements have sucked up most of her time for the past week. But she’s been happy to do it because she also wants to register her protest at today’s march. After 20 years working for the charity, trying to improve conditions, she’s worried that things are taking a step backwards. “If they cut DLA there’s a chance people will become institutionalised again,” she says, shouting over the noise of commuters arriving for work. 9.37am: Good morning. Between 5,000 and 10,000 disabled people are expected to march in London today in a rally against cuts to benefits and services. The Hardest Hit march, organised jointly by the UK Disabled People’s Council and the Disability Benefits Consortium, is expected to be the largest event of its kind for decades. The protesters are voicing their anger at the combined effects of changes to welfare eligibility, cuts to disability living allowance and reductions in council funding for carers and services. In a comment piece in today’s Guardian, Sue Marsh, who blogs at Diary of a Benefit Scrounger , explains more : Sick and disabled people will lose £9bn in vital support over the lifetime of this parliament. That’s a colossal 10% of George Osborne’s entire £89bn deficit reduction plan. Some studies have found that it will cost the disabled a full third of our incomes. Incapacity benefit is being phased out and the much tougher employment support allowance (ESA) is disqualifying 93% of claimants from long-term support. Disability living allowance is being scrapped and replaced with “personal independent payments”, which will disqualify a further 20% of the most severely disabled. In another comment piece, Alice Maynard , the chair of disability charity Scope, adds: The simple fact is that daily life costs more if you are disabled, which means disabled people and their families are more vulnerable to the impact of losing a local service, a wage freeze or seeing their benefits adjusted. Marchers will be addressed by Liam Byrne, the shadow work and pensions secretary. Maria Miller, minister for disabled people, declined an invitation to attend, on the grounds that she needed to be at prime minister’s questions, according to Jaspal Dhani, chief executive of the United Kingdom Disabled People’s Council. My colleagues Amelia Gentleman and Karen McVeigh are with the march and we’ll be hearing from them shortly, and my colleagues from the video desk will be sending footage as soon as possible. Amelia wrote a story about the march in today’s Guardian, which you can read here . Lucy Glennon, who has the rare skin condition epidermolysis bullosa, explained why she was marching today, and we’ll be hearing more from her throughout the day: I’m joining the march today in the hope that it will raise awareness on the cuts and changes to welfare and benefits and how they will significantly impact disabled people. While I understand everyone has to accept some change to their life in order for the country to save money, it is not really appreciated how much more disabled people are going to feel the bite of the cuts, and many are already adapting to changes with difficulty. I have a painful condition, epidermolysis bullosa, and today I am taking part in the march being pushed in my wheelchair by Cynthia Richards, one of the social care managers for DEBRA , the charity that helps people with my condition and works to find a cure. With regard to people with EB, we believe it is wrong that those who are completely unable to walk, including children, could be ticked as being fine to ‘mobilise’ under the proposed changes to Disability Living Allowance, which is being replaced with a much more unfair system of assessment for Personal Independent Payment. It is also wrong that the new assessment for Employment Support Allowance does not give much consideration to pain experienced when doing tasks or walking, when some people with EB are unable to walk without strong opiates, as walking often creates sores and wounds on their feet. It is also unfair that some people with EB have already been told by their local councils not to request more care, no matter how much they need it, as it would put their existing care package under assessment and could result in it stopping completely. Here’s a rough schedule for today : 11.30am onwards: Campaigners gather on Victoria Embankment by Horseguards Avenue. 12-12.30pm: Rally on Victoria Embankment. Speakers include disabled people, MPs and Jane Asher. 12.30pm-1.30pm: March – from Victoria Embankment, along Parliament Square and Millbank, finishing at Dean Stanley Street. 1.30pm-5.30pm: Campaigners meeting their MPs in Westminster Hall. The actress Jane Asher is president of three disability organisations involved in the march: Arthritis Care, National Autistic Society and Parkinson’s UK. You can find the website for the march here . Disability London Protest Welfare Public sector cuts Paul Owen guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
‘Legal highs’ outstrip attempts at regulation

EU agencies warn synthetic psychoactive substances are spreading at an unprecedented rate, with 41 new ones in 2010 New “legal highs” are being made widely available online and in specialised shops at an unprecedented pace, outstripping attempts to control them, the European Union’s drugs agency has warned. In a report published jointly with the law enforcement agency Europol , the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) says in 2010 the two agencies officially noted 41 new psychoactive substances, many of them imitating the effects of ecstasy. Fourteen of them were first identified in Britain. The Lisbon-based monitoring centre says the new substances are appearing at an “unprecedented pace”, with the 41 new ones the largest number reported in any single year. The figure compares with 24 identified in 2009 and 13 in 2008. The agencies say roughly a quarter of the substances identified last year – 11 of the 41 – were variants on synthetic cannabis drugs such as Spice , which 16 European countries, including Britain, have decided to ban or control amid health concerns. A further 15 are synthetic cathinone derivatives, including mephedrone – also known as meow meow – which imitate the effects of ecstasy, amphetamines and cocaine. These were banned across Europe last December. The European drugs experts also identified for the first time derivatives of two other established drugs, ketamine and PCP. The report says many of the newly identified substances were picked up by national police agencies through test purchases either online or from specialised “smart” or “head” shops. Many are marketed as legal highs or as plant food, and labelled “not for human consumption”. The descriptions are specifically designed to circumvent drug controls. It says their accelerating proliferation demonstrates the speed and sophistication at which the market is reacting to attempts to ban or control them, and the growing challenges presented by globalisation and innovation. Many are being developed by chemists in illegal laboratories in south-east Asia. Wolfgang Götz, the EMCDDA’s director, said: “Given the speed at which new developments occur in this area, it is important to anticipate future challenges. While our early-warning system has recently upped its operational capacity to react rapidly to new substances and products identified, it currently lacks the ability to anticipate emerging threats.” He suggested the EU should give the agency the power to buy the new compounds so it could synthesise and study them. Rob Wainwright, Europol’s director, said the emergence of the substances was now a major feature of Europe’s drugs problem: “Organised crime groups are increasingly active in producing and distributing drugs which can be associated with ecstasy,” he said. “We are determined to combat this phenomenon.” Drugs trade Drugs Health European Union Drugs Drugs policy Police Alan Travis guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
‘Legal highs’ outstrip attempts at regulation

EU agencies warn synthetic psychoactive substances are spreading at an unprecedented rate, with 41 new ones in 2010 New “legal highs” are being made widely available online and in specialised shops at an unprecedented pace, outstripping attempts to control them, the European Union’s drugs agency has warned. In a report published jointly with the law enforcement agency Europol , the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) says in 2010 the two agencies officially noted 41 new psychoactive substances, many of them imitating the effects of ecstasy. Fourteen of them were first identified in Britain. The Lisbon-based monitoring centre says the new substances are appearing at an “unprecedented pace”, with the 41 new ones the largest number reported in any single year. The figure compares with 24 identified in 2009 and 13 in 2008. The agencies say roughly a quarter of the substances identified last year – 11 of the 41 – were variants on synthetic cannabis drugs such as Spice , which 16 European countries, including Britain, have decided to ban or control amid health concerns. A further 15 are synthetic cathinone derivatives, including mephedrone – also known as meow meow – which imitate the effects of ecstasy, amphetamines and cocaine. These were banned across Europe last December. The European drugs experts also identified for the first time derivatives of two other established drugs, ketamine and PCP. The report says many of the newly identified substances were picked up by national police agencies through test purchases either online or from specialised “smart” or “head” shops. Many are marketed as legal highs or as plant food, and labelled “not for human consumption”. The descriptions are specifically designed to circumvent drug controls. It says their accelerating proliferation demonstrates the speed and sophistication at which the market is reacting to attempts to ban or control them, and the growing challenges presented by globalisation and innovation. Many are being developed by chemists in illegal laboratories in south-east Asia. Wolfgang Götz, the EMCDDA’s director, said: “Given the speed at which new developments occur in this area, it is important to anticipate future challenges. While our early-warning system has recently upped its operational capacity to react rapidly to new substances and products identified, it currently lacks the ability to anticipate emerging threats.” He suggested the EU should give the agency the power to buy the new compounds so it could synthesise and study them. Rob Wainwright, Europol’s director, said the emergence of the substances was now a major feature of Europe’s drugs problem: “Organised crime groups are increasingly active in producing and distributing drugs which can be associated with ecstasy,” he said. “We are determined to combat this phenomenon.” Drugs trade Drugs Health European Union Drugs Drugs policy Police Alan Travis guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Vote could lead to more academically selective state schools

Education bill amendment calls for private schools which become academies to retain right to select pupils on ability MPs are preparing to vote over whether to increase the number of academically selective state schools. An amendment to the education bill, which will be debated in the Commons today, calls for independent schools to be allowed to keep the right to select pupils on ability if institutions opt out of the private sector and turn into academies. If MPs vote for the amendment, it will be included in the education bill and could eventually become enshrined in law. Selective state schools – or grammars – are a politically fraught topic for the coalition, in particular the Conservatives. Four years ago, a row broke out after David Willetts, then the Tory’s education spokesman, spoke out against grammar schools, arguing that they entrench disadvantage. David Cameron tried to calm a row that then ensued among Conservative MPs in favour of the schools. Cameron argued that the debate was “pointless”. He said history had shown that creating grammar schools was “extremely difficult and … often leads to them being very unpopular and they are then got rid of”. Graham Brady, Conservative MP for Altrincham and Sale West, resigned from the frontbench over Cameron’s comments. Last year, Brady asked Michael Gove, the education secretary, whether he would allow there to be more selective state schools where parents wanted it. Gove responded: “My foot is hovering over the pedal. I’ll have to see what my co-driver Nick Clegg has to say.” The amendment to the education bill was tabled by Brady and has the support of at least 38 Conservative MPs, including John Redwood and David Davis. The economic climate has made many parents decide against sending their children to private schools. Seven private schools have so far become academies. The number of private schools considering becoming academies is not known. There are 164 grammar schools in England. Anthony Seldon, master of Wellington college, said that becoming an academy would not be “the move of choice” for many, but that financially they may have no alternative. Andy Burnham, Labour’s shadow education secretary, described the amendment as an “audacious bid” to expand selection in state schools. “This reveals the Tory party’s true instincts on education – an ever more divided and elitist school system,” he said. “We know this is what Michael Gove wants too, but this blatant attempt by his backbenchers reveals that we are in a real battle to protect a fair education system. Labour is fighting for fair admissions for all families, while the Tory party are siding with the few not the many. The Lib Dems need to decide whose side they’re on.” The bill also gives headteachers greater powers to exclude violent and aggressive pupils and ensures heads have the final say on whether to expel a pupil from their school. At the moment, parents are allowed by law to appeal if their child is excluded and, if successful, can overturn a head’s decision. Other reforms contained in the bill give teachers new rights to search pupils for forbidden items, such as pornography, phones, video cameras or anything they believe might cause harm, and removes the requirement for teachers to give a day’s notice of a detention. A spokesman from the Department for Education said the government opposed Brady’s amendment. “We have no plans for more selective schools. If this amendment does go through, which we don’t think it will, it would be for the government to decide whether or not to allow an independent school to continue to select if they became an academy.” School admissions Schools Grammar schools Academies Education policy Liberal-Conservative coalition Jessica Shepherd guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Vote could lead to more academically selective state schools

Education bill amendment calls for private schools which become academies to retain right to select pupils on ability MPs are preparing to vote over whether to increase the number of academically selective state schools. An amendment to the education bill, which will be debated in the Commons today, calls for independent schools to be allowed to keep the right to select pupils on ability if institutions opt out of the private sector and turn into academies. If MPs vote for the amendment, it will be included in the education bill and could eventually become enshrined in law. Selective state schools – or grammars – are a politically fraught topic for the coalition, in particular the Conservatives. Four years ago, a row broke out after David Willetts, then the Tory’s education spokesman, spoke out against grammar schools, arguing that they entrench disadvantage. David Cameron tried to calm a row that then ensued among Conservative MPs in favour of the schools. Cameron argued that the debate was “pointless”. He said history had shown that creating grammar schools was “extremely difficult and … often leads to them being very unpopular and they are then got rid of”. Graham Brady, Conservative MP for Altrincham and Sale West, resigned from the frontbench over Cameron’s comments. Last year, Brady asked Michael Gove, the education secretary, whether he would allow there to be more selective state schools where parents wanted it. Gove responded: “My foot is hovering over the pedal. I’ll have to see what my co-driver Nick Clegg has to say.” The amendment to the education bill was tabled by Brady and has the support of at least 38 Conservative MPs, including John Redwood and David Davis. The economic climate has made many parents decide against sending their children to private schools. Seven private schools have so far become academies. The number of private schools considering becoming academies is not known. There are 164 grammar schools in England. Anthony Seldon, master of Wellington college, said that becoming an academy would not be “the move of choice” for many, but that financially they may have no alternative. Andy Burnham, Labour’s shadow education secretary, described the amendment as an “audacious bid” to expand selection in state schools. “This reveals the Tory party’s true instincts on education – an ever more divided and elitist school system,” he said. “We know this is what Michael Gove wants too, but this blatant attempt by his backbenchers reveals that we are in a real battle to protect a fair education system. Labour is fighting for fair admissions for all families, while the Tory party are siding with the few not the many. The Lib Dems need to decide whose side they’re on.” The bill also gives headteachers greater powers to exclude violent and aggressive pupils and ensures heads have the final say on whether to expel a pupil from their school. At the moment, parents are allowed by law to appeal if their child is excluded and, if successful, can overturn a head’s decision. Other reforms contained in the bill give teachers new rights to search pupils for forbidden items, such as pornography, phones, video cameras or anything they believe might cause harm, and removes the requirement for teachers to give a day’s notice of a detention. A spokesman from the Department for Education said the government opposed Brady’s amendment. “We have no plans for more selective schools. If this amendment does go through, which we don’t think it will, it would be for the government to decide whether or not to allow an independent school to continue to select if they became an academy.” School admissions Schools Grammar schools Academies Education policy Liberal-Conservative coalition Jessica Shepherd guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Vote could lead to more academically selective state schools

Education bill amendment calls for private schools which become academies to retain right to select pupils on ability MPs are preparing to vote over whether to increase the number of academically selective state schools. An amendment to the education bill, which will be debated in the Commons today, calls for independent schools to be allowed to keep the right to select pupils on ability if institutions opt out of the private sector and turn into academies. If MPs vote for the amendment, it will be included in the education bill and could eventually become enshrined in law. Selective state schools – or grammars – are a politically fraught topic for the coalition, in particular the Conservatives. Four years ago, a row broke out after David Willetts, then the Tory’s education spokesman, spoke out against grammar schools, arguing that they entrench disadvantage. David Cameron tried to calm a row that then ensued among Conservative MPs in favour of the schools. Cameron argued that the debate was “pointless”. He said history had shown that creating grammar schools was “extremely difficult and … often leads to them being very unpopular and they are then got rid of”. Graham Brady, Conservative MP for Altrincham and Sale West, resigned from the frontbench over Cameron’s comments. Last year, Brady asked Michael Gove, the education secretary, whether he would allow there to be more selective state schools where parents wanted it. Gove responded: “My foot is hovering over the pedal. I’ll have to see what my co-driver Nick Clegg has to say.” The amendment to the education bill was tabled by Brady and has the support of at least 38 Conservative MPs, including John Redwood and David Davis. The economic climate has made many parents decide against sending their children to private schools. Seven private schools have so far become academies. The number of private schools considering becoming academies is not known. There are 164 grammar schools in England. Anthony Seldon, master of Wellington college, said that becoming an academy would not be “the move of choice” for many, but that financially they may have no alternative. Andy Burnham, Labour’s shadow education secretary, described the amendment as an “audacious bid” to expand selection in state schools. “This reveals the Tory party’s true instincts on education – an ever more divided and elitist school system,” he said. “We know this is what Michael Gove wants too, but this blatant attempt by his backbenchers reveals that we are in a real battle to protect a fair education system. Labour is fighting for fair admissions for all families, while the Tory party are siding with the few not the many. The Lib Dems need to decide whose side they’re on.” The bill also gives headteachers greater powers to exclude violent and aggressive pupils and ensures heads have the final say on whether to expel a pupil from their school. At the moment, parents are allowed by law to appeal if their child is excluded and, if successful, can overturn a head’s decision. Other reforms contained in the bill give teachers new rights to search pupils for forbidden items, such as pornography, phones, video cameras or anything they believe might cause harm, and removes the requirement for teachers to give a day’s notice of a detention. A spokesman from the Department for Education said the government opposed Brady’s amendment. “We have no plans for more selective schools. If this amendment does go through, which we don’t think it will, it would be for the government to decide whether or not to allow an independent school to continue to select if they became an academy.” School admissions Schools Grammar schools Academies Education policy Liberal-Conservative coalition Jessica Shepherd guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …