Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 1110)
Milly Dowler’s father tells court he was early murder suspect

Extreme fetish pornography in family attic led to questions from police and were ‘complete betrayal of fatherhood’ The father of murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler yesterday admitted he was a suspect in her disappearance after police found “extreme fetishist latex and bondage pornography” at the family home. In an emotional testimony before an Old

Continue reading …
US hits $14.3tn debt ceiling

• Treasury secretary Tim Geithner urges Congress to raise limit • Federal pension fund payments suspended to avoid default The US government hit its $14.3 trillion debt ceiling on Monday, triggering a series of “extraordinary measures” to stave off a default while politicians argue over raising the borrowing limit . Treasury secretary Tim Geithner announced that he was suspending payments into two federal pension funds, after the government reached its maximum legal borrowing limit. Geithner said the suspension should allow the US to avoid a default before 2 August and urged Congress to agree to raise the debt ceiling before this 11-week deadline expires. “I have written to Congress on previous occasions regarding the importance of timely action to increase the debt limit in order to protect the full faith and credit of the United States and avoid catastrophic economic consequences for citizens,” said Geithner in a letter to Congress. “I again urge Congress to act to increase the statutory debt limit as soon as possible.” Under Geithner’s plan, the US government will temporarily stop payments into the civil service retirement and disability fund and liquidate certain CSRDF assets to fund government business. It will also cut payments into the federal employees retirement system. Both funds provide retirement benefits to federal employees. The CSRDF funds a defined-benefit scheme that was superseded by the FERS in 1987. Geithner pledged to repay the lost funds once Congress has approved a higher debt ceiling. But there has been little progress in recent weeks over this issue. The US administration has insisted it needs to be able to push national debt above $14.3bn as it navigates the financial crisis. President Barack Obama said last week that without a higher limit, investors would lose faith in the country’s ability to service its debts. This, he warned, might “unravel the entire financial system”, while Geithner has predicted that the US would fall back into recession. Obama’s opponents have demanded major budget cuts in return for permission to borrow more. House speaker John Boehner, the Republican congressman for Ohio, has argued that “everything should be on the table except raising taxes”, as this would hamper the US recovery. The debt limit was created in 1917, when Congress allowed the treasury to borrow up to $11.315bn to fund US participation in the first world war. Before that, Congress would authorise certain loans for particular projects. The rules were relaxed further in 1939. Since 1962, Congress has raised the debt ceiling on 74 separate occasions. The extent of US borrowing was under fresh scrutiny last month when Standard & Poor’s cut its outlook on the country’s AAA-rating from “stable” to “negative” . There is still a strong appetite for US debt in the bond markets. The yield or interest rate demanded by traders on 10-year government debt remained low at around 3.165%, only slightly above Germany. UK 10-year bonds were trading at a yield around 3.38%. Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke, who also supports raising the debt ceiling, said the US should try to boost growth through increased government spending on research and development. US Government borrowing Timothy Geithner US economy Economics US Congress Obama administration US politics United States Graeme Wearden guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

I’ve been saying that Fox News has been running the GOP field of candidates for what seems like years now. Howard Kurtz asks the wrong question on CNN: Is Fox News in an “Uncomfortable Position” Because It Employs Potential GOP Presidential Contenders? Answer: No. They’re perfectly comfortable. That’s been their strategy all along. Remember, Roger Ailes has always been a pivotal media-savvy right-wing operative who orchestrated the Dan Rather episode to try and rid Papa Bush of the Wimp factor. Fox News Chief Roger Ailes is up in arms over the now famous clash between former President Bill Clinton and Fox’s Chris Wallace . He says Clinton had a “wild overreaction” and his “attack” on Wallace was “an assault on all journalists.” How supremely ironic that Roger Ailes would be saying this. On January 25th, 1988, it was Ailes who, sitting five feet away from then Vice President George H.W. Bush in his Senate office in the Capitol building, literally used cue cards to help orchestrate the now-famous Bush confrontation with Dan Rather over the Iran/Contra affair . Kurtz should be asking if it’s ethical that Fox News has its hands as deep into GOP politics. David Frum was the first Republican to say the obvious: Frum: “Republicans originally thought that Fox worked for us, and now we are discovering we work for Fox.” I’d say Frum’s point has been validated completely. I do like Howie’s show, and usually watch it every week because it does focus on the media. Reliable Sources: KURTZ: Huckabee mentioned his belief in Jesus Christ. He didn’t mention his $500,000 Fox News salary. But he says he likes having a comfortable life. But the role of Fox News in this whole preseason, Gingrich and Santorum were essentially forced off the payroll, and they both are now running. Huckabee, not. It just shows you how much of a factor Fox has become in this Republican primary. QUINN: Fox is huge, but so is Twitter. You know? KURTZ: Fox is huge, but Fox also has employed several people who either could or, in this case, didn’t become serious White House contenders. QUINN: Right. Yes. Well, I mean — KURTZ: Is that an uncomfortable position for a network? QUINN: Clearly not for them. I mean, they are making a lot of money off of these people. And, you know, if Sarah Palin, when she announces whatever she is going to do, I’m sure it will be on Fox. Huckabee, Santorum, Gingrich, Palin, Rove have all been paid employees of the network. Santorum and Gingrich were suspended by FOX because they were getting into the race and they held up on doing the same to Huckabee until he made his decision. I would say that Rove should have his contract suspended now until after the election since he’s raising millions of dollars to influence the upcoming election. Roger Aile’s gave Sarah Palin a job to help groom her for the media spotlight that she was so unprepared for the first time around. Why isn’t Sarah Palin being forced to commit one way or the other yet? We know she’s a cash cow for FOX, but this is getting ridiculous. My question is why isn’t the media outraged by the control FOX News has over the candidates running for President in 2012? And here’s a portent of things to come: KURTZ: When Sarah Palin makes here decision, it will be like LeBron James and that ESPN special about what team he’s going to play for. I think that will get a little bit of attention. LeBron James became one of the most hated men in sports overnight after his ESPN stunt. If Palin does try to make it a big spectacle about her decision and then doesn’t run, well….people will not be happy either. And her negatives are already very high.

Continue reading …
Donald Trump bows out of 2012 US presidential election race

US mogul formally announces he will not seek the Republican nomination, claiming he is ‘not ready to leave the private sector’ Faced with the choice of hosting The Apprentice or taking on Barack Obama in next year’s election, Donald Trump opted to stick with his television programme. The multimillionaire has formally announced he will not be joining the small band of candidates seeking the Republican nomination for the White House race. Few US political commentators took his campaign seriously and many suggested he was only in it for the publicity. In a statement, he said: “After considerable deliberation and reflection, I have decided not to pursue the office of the presidency. This decision does not come easily or without regret, especially when my potential candidacy continues to be validated by ranking at the top of the Republican contenders in polls across the country.” Modesty is not a Trump characteristic and this is reflected in his statement. “I maintain the strong conviction that if I were to run, I would be able to win the primary and, ultimately, the general election.” He added: “I have spent the past several months unofficially campaigning and recognise that running for public office cannot be done half-heartedly. Ultimately, however, business is my greatest passion and I am not ready to leave the private sector.” The decision comes after the businessman was repeatedly trounced by Obama last month over the “birther” issue. Trump took doubts about Obama’s birthplace from the fringes of American politics to the mainstream, but the president undercut him by publishing the long form of his birth certificate, proving he had been born in the US. Obama humiliated Trump a few days later with a series of jokes at his expense at the White House correspondents’ dinner, with the businessman present. In spite of Trump’s claims about being frontrunner in the polls, one published on Monday by the Politico website and George Washington University showed 71% of those surveyed thought he had no chance of becoming president. Trump went through the motions of being a Republican contender, making speeches in key early states such as New Hampshire, and for a short time seemed in tune with the public mood. But he offered little in the way of policies and senior Republicans viewed his candidacy, with its emphasis on issues such as Obama’s birthplace, as an irritating distraction. The field of declared Republicans so far is small and has failed to generate much excitement. Mike Huckabee, the former governor of Arkansas, who had a good run in 2008 in spite of a lack of funds, announced on Saturday that he would not be standing next year. Some Republicans see Obama as too tough a candidate and prefer to wait until 2016. Sarah Palin, who would bring excitement to the race, has not yet said whether she will seek the Republican nomination. After a quiet few weeks, she re-ignited interest on Monday when she sent out a fundraising mail shot in South Carolina, one of the key states in the battle for the Republican nomination. Donald Trump US elections 2012 Republicans Democrats Barack Obama United States US politics Ewen MacAskill guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Liverpool’s heritage status ‘at risk’ from Shanghai-style plan

English Heritage criticises plan for high-rise waterfront and cruise ship terminal Plans to create a “Shanghai-style” high-rise waterfront in Liverpool could threaten the city’s world heritage status, according to an independent report. The Unesco world heritage site takes in the elegant Edwardian “three graces” – the Royal Liver, Cunard and Port of Liverpool buildings – which have defined the skyline for almost a century. But Peel Holdings wants to develop the northern docklands , with skyscrapers, thousands of apartments and a cruise ship terminal. The plans have come under fire from English Heritage . Part of the city’s waterfront was granted world heritage status in 2004. At the time, Unesco said: “Liverpool is an outstanding example of a world mercantile port city, which represents the early development of global trading and cultural connections throughout the British empire.” Peel argues that the Liverpool Waters plan will regenerate former and disused dockland, create thousands of jobs and replicate the drama of Shanghai on Merseyside, even featuring a tall building called the Shanghai Tower. But, the report, commissioned by English Heritage, warns that the relationship between the site and the river could be “severely compromised”. It says the buildings will have “a significant damaging negative impact on the Liverpool world heritage site and its outstanding universal value”. It concludes: “There is little to be found in the application which instils confidence that the Liverpool Waters scheme will be recognised internationally as innovative or a world leader.” It says the development risks overwhelming the defining characteristics of the area with opposing ones. It warns that the setting of key heritage assets such as the Victoria Clock Tower and the Stanley Dock tobacco warehouse will be damaged by development “that fails to respect fundamental notions of form and function”. Some of the impacts would be of a “major magnitude”. The report also highlights four separate policies with which the planning application fails to comply. Henry Owen-John, of English Heritage, said: “We believe that it is possible to come up with a creative and imaginative scheme of regeneration for the area without necessarily having these tall buildings [at Clarence Dock] that is still economically viable and diminishes the impact.” Peel, however, has said the report is flawed and has refused to agree to any demands to remove skyscrapers. Lindsey Ashworth, its director of investments, told the Liverpool Daily Post: “It is not about making a profit. The opportunity is now. I think it is a shame that we cannot reach agreement. But we are right, and they are completely wrong.” The scheme is due to go before Liverpool council’s planning committee later this year. If, and when, English Heritage objects, it is likely to be referred to Eric Pickles, the communities secretary, for a public inquiry. Liverpool Heritage Helen Carter guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

So the New York Times is reporting that the results of a Senate Ethics Committee investigation may leave Ensign liable for charges of obstructing an FEC investigation, violating federal lobbying bans, and making unlawful payments to the husband of the aide with whom he was having an affair. But as Mark Howard at News Corpse points out, it looks like Fox News was also part of the widespread coverup: However, any investigation of this matter needs to include possible interference on the part of Fox News and Glenn Beck-wannabe, Megyn Kelly . There is evidence that Kelly, who received a letter from Doug Hampton revealing Ensign’s infidelity, warned Ensign that the news was about to come out rather than reporting on it. As I wrote on June 19, 2009 : “Fox News knew of Ensign’s infidelity five days before Ensign came forward. They got the information from the husband of Ensign’s mistress. That’s a pretty good source, especially when he asserts that he had corroborating evidence.” First Fox denied having received any letter. Then they admitted that they had received the letter a day before the news broke. Then a FedEx receipt revealed that they had received the letter three days earlier. And Fox broadcast no stories about the Ensign affair during any of that time, or even for several days after. When Ensign came forward to confess his sins, he told the press that he was doing so because the story was about to come out in the media. So the question is: did he learn that from Megyn Kelly? The evidence strongly suggests that Kelly tipped Ensign off and set the stage for his announcement . Then she and Fox kept the story quiet in the days that followed. That is not the behavior of a “news” network. It is the behavior of an accomplice.

Continue reading …

So the New York Times is reporting that the results of a Senate Ethics Committee investigation may leave Ensign liable for charges of obstructing an FEC investigation, violating federal lobbying bans, and making unlawful payments to the husband of the aide with whom he was having an affair. But as Mark Howard at News Corpse points out, it looks like Fox News was also part of the widespread coverup: However, any investigation of this matter needs to include possible interference on the part of Fox News and Glenn Beck-wannabe, Megyn Kelly . There is evidence that Kelly, who received a letter from Doug Hampton revealing Ensign’s infidelity, warned Ensign that the news was about to come out rather than reporting on it. As I wrote on June 19, 2009 : “Fox News knew of Ensign’s infidelity five days before Ensign came forward. They got the information from the husband of Ensign’s mistress. That’s a pretty good source, especially when he asserts that he had corroborating evidence.” First Fox denied having received any letter. Then they admitted that they had received the letter a day before the news broke. Then a FedEx receipt revealed that they had received the letter three days earlier. And Fox broadcast no stories about the Ensign affair during any of that time, or even for several days after. When Ensign came forward to confess his sins, he told the press that he was doing so because the story was about to come out in the media. So the question is: did he learn that from Megyn Kelly? The evidence strongly suggests that Kelly tipped Ensign off and set the stage for his announcement . Then she and Fox kept the story quiet in the days that followed. That is not the behavior of a “news” network. It is the behavior of an accomplice.

Continue reading …
University Guide 2012: Cambridge tops the Guardian league table

Cambridge beats arch rival Oxford to take first place in the Guardian ranking of UK universities Cambridge has taken the top spot in this year’s Guardian University Guide league table, breaking its arch rival Oxford’s six-year stint as the UK’s leading institution. Oxford has come second and St Andrews third, while the London School of Economics has climbed four places from last year to take fourth place. University College London, Warwick, Lancaster, Durham, Loughborough and Imperial College make up the top 10. The University Guide, published in full on the Guardian website on Tuesday, is based on data for full-time undergraduates at UK universities. The league table goes live on the website at midnight tonight. Our analysis shows that universities with low rankings are almost as likely to be planning to charge maximum tuition fees of £9,000 in autumn 2012 as those with high rankings. London Metropolitan University, which comes bottom of the Guardian tables, intends to charge between £4,500 and £9,000 for its degrees. Salford, Liverpool John Moores, Manchester Metropolitan and the University of East London – all of which rank in the bottom 20 – want to charge £9,000 for at least some of their courses. The government’s access watchdog, the Office for Fair Access, is looking at the fees each university in England wants to charge and will announce in July whether it approves. All the English universities in our top 20 intend to charge £9,000 fees, apart from London School of Economics, which has not yet decided . The first university that proposes to charge less than £9,000 for all of its courses is Sunderland, which is ranked 48th. There are a total of 120 institutions in the tables: 38 in the top half intend to charge £9,000 for at least some of their courses, while 18 in the bottom half propose to do the same. Universities are ranked according to how much they spend per student; their student/staff ratio; the career prospects of their graduates; what grades applicants need; a value-added score that compares the academic achievements of first-years and their final degree results; and how content final-year students are with their courses, based on the annual National Student Survey. Birmingham City University has fallen most since last year – 24 places, from 66th to 90th – while Middlesex is the biggest climber, reaching 75th place this year compared with 112th last year. Durham has risen from 17th place to eighth. While the oldest universities dominate the top positions in the tables, the newest have improved their rankings since last year. Winchester has leapt from 96th place to 69th. The tables, compiled by an independent consultancy firm, Intelligent Metrix, are weightedin favour of the National Student Survey. As part of the survey, final-year students are asked to score their universities for overall satisfaction, feedback and contact hours. Other league tables concentrate more on research ratings. The Guardian publishes an overall ranking table, separate tables to show which universities are best – and worst – for each subject and another table for specialist institutions. The more a university spends on each student, the more likely it is to have a high ranking and the more satisfied its students seem. However, our judges took into account that some universities do not teach expensive courses, such as engineering, and so their spending is lower. There is huge variation in how much universities spend per student, with an average of £3,428 in 2009-10 (a fall from the £3,495 the year before). At Oxford, average spend per student fell to £11,232 in 2009-10 from £11,410 the year before. The university spends substantially more than other institutions. Cambridge spent £8,612 in 2009-10, a rise from £8,118 the year before. St Mary’s University College in west London and Leeds Trinity University College spent among the lowest of all institutions per student. The tables show that Cambridge has overtaken Oxford in philosophy, law, politics, theology, maths, classics, anthropology and modern languages. However, Oxford overtook Cambridge in psychology and also came top in chemistry, business and management, and art and design. Loughborough is best for sports science, while King’s College London is top for dentistry. University College London topped the table for English, while Trinity Laban Conservatoire excelled for drama and dance. Northumbria has shot up the table for modern languages, from 48th last year to third this year. Universities with high rankings tend to have fewer dropouts, and fewer students per academic. The top 20 institutions have a drop-out rate after the first year of just 4%, compared with almost 12% for the bottom 20. There are 14.2 students per academic among the top 20, but 21.5 among the bottom 20. The smallest institutions tend to be ranked closer to the bottom. Professor David Tidmarsh, vice-chancellor of Birmingham City University, says he expects his university’s fall in position to be temporary: “It is caused by student number growth, which has now been curbed, and student satisfaction scores, which we expect to improve significantly as a consequence both of increased investment and of the way in which we are engaging students as partners in their learning experience.” He says the university is investing £180m in new buildings, facilities and equipment. Swansea Metropolitan, Wolverhampton and Liverpool Hope did not allow the Guardian to use their data. Meanwhile, the government has cut the number of places universities can offer on teacher training courses. Cambridge University, which comes top of our table for education courses, will have 49 fewer places on its teacher training course this September, an 11% cut. Altogether, almost 4,000 fewer places will be available on teacher training programmes. A spokesman from the Department for Education says pupil numbers are falling sharply in secondary schools and so the need for new teachers has gone down. • The Guardian University Guide 2012 league table of universities goes live at midnight tonight. Watch out for it on the front of the Guardian website. Subject tables and the table of specialist institutions will be available from Tuesday morning. University guide Higher education University of Cambridge Tuition fees Students Jessica Shepherd guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Taliban tunnel jailbreak account reveals initial setbacks

Tunnellers veered off course before emerging in Kandahar prison cell and leading 500 prisoners to escape Taliban tunnellers who burrowed into Kandahar’s main jail in April dug a superfluous 120 metres after veering off course, according to an account of the prison break published by the insurgent group. The escape of nearly 500 Taliban prisoners without a shot being fired was a spectacular coup for the group. But the version of events that appeared last week in al-Somood, an Arabic magazine published by the Taliban, revealed the setback after the tunnel, which was supposed to enter the wing of the prison housing political prisoners, veered off to the right, “reaching a village close to the prison”. The problem was rectified after insurgents “downloaded the prison map from the internet” and used “earth measurement tools” to dig 100m back to where they needed to be, according to a translation published on the website of Alex Strick van Linschoten , a researcher who studies the Taliban. The tunnellers had difficulties ensuring they emerged in the right cell in the political prisoners’ wing of Sarposa jail. They were assisted by one of a few inmates who were in on the plot. He found excuses to bang loudly on his cell floor to guide the tunnellers. All inmates except two conspirators were corralled into a Qur’an recitation session in order to keep secret that the tunnellers had successfully pushed a test blade through the floor. With the Arab world an important source of funds for insurgents, the articles go out of their way to demonstrate the remarkable cunning and organisational skills of a small group who pulled off a feat that David Petraeus, commander of Nato forces in Afghanistan, conceded was a “setback” to improving security in the south. Just two weeks after their escape, many former prisoners took part in a two-day assault on government buildings in Kandahar. The article said the mission cost $20,000 (£12,000), with the bill offset by a business enterprise. Tunnelling began from a building outside the prison walls that the Taliban turned into a cement workshop, which employed workers and produced building materials. Work began on the tunnel only after the cement workers had finished work for the day, and cement blocks produced during the five-month operation were sold “making much profit”. The Taliban made more money from the earth excavated by the tunnellers, which they drove out of the compound in trucks and sold in a nearby market, the article said. The magazine carried an interview with Muhammad Idris, a 23-year-old escapee, who described being told of the escape attempt just hours before it happened, and the moment when tunnellers burst through the prison’s concrete floor using metal poles and car jacks. Taliban commanders did not allow prisoners to carry luggage in order to prevent delays, and anyone with more than about $65 in cash had their extra money redistributed to other prisoners. The process of getting all the prisoners through the main tunnel, as well as a secondary spur that led to a detention area, was eased by a telephone wire that ran through the tunnel and allowed commanders to talk to one another. Weapons were brought so “state spies” in the political wing could be dealt with. “The decision was made if such spies were to cause trouble or attempt telling the prison guards we would kill them by these arms and knives,” Idris said.The articles revealed that the Taliban customised conventional wheelbarrows by attaching wheels from children’s bicycles bought in a local market, which they then dragged through the tunnel with ropes. The finished structure boasted a ventilation tube and 45 electric lights. Taliban Afghanistan Global terrorism Jon Boone guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
’60 Minutes’ exposes the ‘sovereign citizens’ as the nation’s most serious domestic-terrorism threat

Click here to view this media [H/t Heather] 60 Minutes’ Byron Pitt had a superb segment last night on the sovereign citizens movement, springboarding from the tragic case of Jerry and Joe Kane, two sovereign citizens who mowed down a couple of West Memphis, Arkansas, police officers before themselves being killed. It was actually a well assembled and insightful piece of reporting, including the analysis provided by J.J. McNabb, who is unquestionably one of the leading experts on the movement from the outside. And while they let movement guru Alfred Adask run off at the mouth, in the end his own radicalism and complete lack of any connection to reality were made self-evident by his own words. The only question is: Will Peter King finally listen and hold a congressional hearing on right-wing-extremist domestic terrorism, too? The story particularly featured the work of Bob Paudert, the police chief in West Memphis father of one of the two slain officers. We’ve discussed Paudert’s work previously (more here ). He’s been adamant that the information that could have saved his officers that day hadn’t been disseminated to them because it was being bottled up. Why is that happening? Well, as we noted then, we need look no further than the right-wing shriekosphere, which has done everything it can to demonize factual reportage of the actual threat of domestic terrorist activity from right-wing extremists: , The incident was yet another reminder that one of the most significant ongoing threats to law enforcement officers in this country comes from right-wing extremists of the Patriot/”sovereign citizen” variety — people who take Republicans’ government-bashing rhetoric to its illogical extreme and declare themselves free of federal laws and functionally laws unto themselves. There are constant reminders of this threat — from the Hutaree Militia to the Richard Poplawskis out there. Of course, we all were witness to the right-wing shrieking over that Department of Homeland Security bulletin warning police officers around the country about the nature of this resurgent threat. That’s because conservatives are more concerned about whitewashing away these embarrassments than they are with the lives of police officers. They like to use dead cops as props to attack liberals while loudly arguing, as Glenn Beck did a couple years ago, that even paying attention to such right-wing threats is a smear of mainstream conservatives. Ironically, Glenn Beck was nattering at length on his Fox News show this week claiming that left-wing extremists are about to start killing police officers en masse, which is why they need to destroy their unions. Right. The unfortunate reality is that federal officials are almost certainly not sharing this vital intelligence with police officers because, whenever they do, they’re viciously and loudly attacked by right-wing pundits for allegedly smearing mainstream conservatives. Amazingly, no one in the mainstream media seems to have yet cottoned to the fact that this really is a near-outright confession of complicity . Indeed, domestic terrorism is sharply increasing in the past two years, as evidenced by the 22 incidents and counting we’ve documented involving right-wing extremists committing acts of violence against “liberals” and government targets. But because right-wing talkers only want to discuss terrorism as a “Muslim” phenomenon , we’re getting a badly skewed understanding of the nature of terrorism. Here’s that map — and many of these indeed involve crimes committed by self-described “sovereign citizens”: Click on map to see interactive version.

Continue reading …