Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 1056)
Ian Tomlinson death prosecution decision due tomorrow

DPP Keir Starmer will give result of review on whether or not to charge PC Simon Harwood over death of newspaper seller Britain’s most senior prosecutor will announce tomorrow whether the police officer who pushed Ian Tomlinson at the G20 protests will be prosecuted for manslaughter. PC Simon Harwood struck the newspaper seller with a baton and pushed him to the ground near the Bank of England at the protest more than two years ago. Three weeks ago, an inquest jury concluded Tomlinson, a 47-year-old father of nine, had been unlawfully killed by a police officer while trying to walk home through the demonstration. The director of public prosecutions, Keir Starmer, launched a review of his earlier decision, reached in July last year, against bringing criminal proceedings against Harwood, a member of the Metropolitan police’s territorial support group. In a statement, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said that review was now complete. “The director of public prosecutions, Keir Starmer QC, made it clear in July 2010 that the decision not to prosecute anyone in relation to the death of Mr Ian Tomlinson would be reviewed in light of the evidence heard at the inquest,” it said. “That review has now taken place and has been conducted carefully and thoroughly. In line with our statement on 3

Continue reading …
Ian Tomlinson death prosecution decision due tomorrow

DPP Keir Starmer will give result of review on whether or not to charge PC Simon Harwood over death of newspaper seller Britain’s most senior prosecutor will announce tomorrow whether the police officer who pushed Ian Tomlinson at the G20 protests will be prosecuted for manslaughter. PC Simon Harwood struck the newspaper seller with a baton and pushed him to the ground near the Bank of England at the protest more than two years ago. Three weeks ago, an inquest jury concluded Tomlinson, a 47-year-old father of nine, had been unlawfully killed by a police officer while trying to walk home through the demonstration. The director of public prosecutions, Keir Starmer, launched a review of his earlier decision, reached in July last year, against bringing criminal proceedings against Harwood, a member of the Metropolitan police’s territorial support group. In a statement, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said that review was now complete. “The director of public prosecutions, Keir Starmer QC, made it clear in July 2010 that the decision not to prosecute anyone in relation to the death of Mr Ian Tomlinson would be reviewed in light of the evidence heard at the inquest,” it said. “That review has now taken place and has been conducted carefully and thoroughly. In line with our statement on 3

Continue reading …
Ian Tomlinson death prosecution decision due tomorrow

DPP Keir Starmer will give result of review on whether or not to charge PC Simon Harwood over death of newspaper seller Britain’s most senior prosecutor will announce tomorrow whether the police officer who pushed Ian Tomlinson at the G20 protests will be prosecuted for manslaughter. PC Simon Harwood struck the newspaper seller with a baton and pushed him to the ground near the Bank of England at the protest more than two years ago. Three weeks ago, an inquest jury concluded Tomlinson, a 47-year-old father of nine, had been unlawfully killed by a police officer while trying to walk home through the demonstration. The director of public prosecutions, Keir Starmer, launched a review of his earlier decision, reached in July last year, against bringing criminal proceedings against Harwood, a member of the Metropolitan police’s territorial support group. In a statement, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said that review was now complete. “The director of public prosecutions, Keir Starmer QC, made it clear in July 2010 that the decision not to prosecute anyone in relation to the death of Mr Ian Tomlinson would be reviewed in light of the evidence heard at the inquest,” it said. “That review has now taken place and has been conducted carefully and thoroughly. In line with our statement on 3

Continue reading …

Former Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin told Fox News’ Judge Jeanine Pirro Saturday that she shouldn’t get used to the idea of Barack Obama being president. “We the people need to rise up say we’ll take a stand for Israel,” Palin said. “We’ll be on their side, even if our, I’m going to call him our temporary leader, because my goal is to make sure that President Obama isn’t reelected in 2012.” The former Alaska governor also responded to the news that Republican presidential candidate had Abba’s “Dancing Queen” for a ringtone. “I think the mood that I am in today and the venue that I am in, I’d pick Gretchen Wilson’s ‘Redneck Woman’ and I’d be proud to have that as my ringtone,” she said.

Continue reading …
Morning Joe Hearts Huntsman

“He's a Morning Joe candidate.” That could be the kiss of death among Republican primary voters, but Mark Halperin meant it as a compliment.

Continue reading …
Pakistani commandos retake Karachi naval base

Taliban militants lose control of base 18 hours after deadly attack seen by many as a humiliating blow to Pakistan’s military Pakistani commandos have regained control of a naval airbase from Taliban militants who attacked then occupied the high-security facility for 18 hours . The attackers – who may have numbered no more than six – destroyed at least two US-supplied surveillance planes and killed 12 security officers in an assault that began late on Sunday night. At least four of the attackers were killed. The Pakistani Taliban claimed responsibility for the assault in Karachi. The group said it was revenge for the 2 May American raid that killed Osama bin Laden and that insurgents were under orders to fight until the death. “They do not want to come out alive, they have gone there to embrace martyrdom,” said a spokesman, Ehsanullah Ehsan. Between four to six heavily armed insurgents stormed the Mehran naval base under cover of darkness, using ladders to get into the facility, said the interior minister, Rehman Malik. Once inside, they scattered around the compound, setting off explosions and hiding in the sprawling facility. During the day on Monday, the militants were holed up in an office building in a gunbattle with commandos, said a navy spokesman Irfan ul-Haq said. Navy helicopters flew over the base, and snipers were seen on a runway control tower. By the afternoon, Haq said the militants had been defeated. Commandos leaving the complex flashed victory signs to reporters. At least 11 navy personnel and one paramilitary ranger were killed, while a further 14 members of the security forces were wounded, said Haq. Malik said four militants were killed, but that two possibly escaped, adding that he saw some of the bodies of the attackers. He said the were dressed in black and looked “like the Star Wars characters”. Six Americans and 11 Chinese nationals were on the base at the time of the attack, but escaped unharmed, he said. The insurgents’ ability to penetrate the facility rattled a military establishment already embarrassed by the unilateral American raid on Bin Laden, and raised the possibility they had inside help. It will also likely lead to more questions over the safety of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons. In 2009, Islamist terrorists stormed army headquarters close to the capital , Islamabad, holding hostages for 22 hours. But unlike the attack in Karachi, the attackers failed to penetrate the complex further. This is the third major attack the group has claimed since the Bin Laden killing. The others were a car bombing that slightly injured American consulate workers in the north-west city of Peshawar and a twin-suicide attack that killed around 90 Pakistani paramilitary police recruits. The Pakistani prime minister, Yousuf Raza Gilani, condemned the latest attack, saying such a “cowardly act of terror could not deter the commitment of the government and people of Pakistan to fight terrorism”. At least two US-made P-3C Orions maritime surveillance planes were destroyed, he said. The US navy puts the cost of the aircraft at $36m (£22m) each. A US embassy spokesman, Alberto Rodriguez, confirmed that six American contractors were on the Mehran base during the time of the attack, but said all were safe. He said the Americans, while working as contractors to help support the P-3C aircraft, did not report to the US embassy or consulate. Four of them were part of a Lockheed Martin contract engineering and technical support team, he added. It was not immediately clear what the Chinese were doing at the base, but Pakistan has purchased Chinese military equipment over the years. Also on Monday, Pakistani intelligence officials, speaking anonymously, said a pair of suspected US missiles hit a vehicle and killed four people near the Afghan border. The strike in the Machi Khel area in the tribal region of North Waziristan. Pakistan Taliban Afghanistan Global terrorism Osama bin Laden United States China guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Banks miss small business lending targets for the first quarter

Lending to small and medium-sized businesses fell more than £2bn short of targets set as part of the Project Merlin deal Britain’s major banks have sparked anger from business groups and anti-poverty campaigners after they failed to meet lending targets set by the government in return for ministers shelving extra taxes on executive bonuses. According to industry figures, bank lending to small and medium-sized businesses fell more than £2bn short of targets set by the Treasury as part of the Project Merlin deal signed in February. David Cameron said that while it would be “a bit hasty” to rush to conclusions, he warned that if banks did not “live up to their side of the bargain” on lending, the government would not have to live up to its side – indicating that the banks could face new taxes if they persist in their failure to meet targets. The shortfall could almost wipe out a £10bn boost to small business borrowing this year predicted by the chancellor George Osborne when agreed wide-ranging commitments from banks on providing extra lending. Bank of England figures revealed that banks fell £2.2bn short of the £19bn they were due to lend small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the first three months of the year. The British Chambers of Commerce warned the situation was unlikely to improve while banks continued to impose high charges for overdrafts and loans. It said businesses also suffered from centralised decision-making over lending that ignored local needs. The Robin Hood tax campaign, which heads a group of charities in favour of a tax on financial transactions, said the bank lending figures showed the government deal was “more Mickey Mouse than Merlin” and doomed to fail. Analysts said Merlin appeared to have done little so far to end the standoff between small businesses and the banks, with each blaming the other for the lack of loans and credit facilities. The British Bankers’ Association, which is representing all the banks signed up to Merlin, said the banks created a lending facility but businesses chose not to use it. Under the agreement, five high street banks – Barclays, Royal Bank of Scotland, Lloyds, HSBC and Santander – pledged to increase lending to small and medium enterprises to £76bn this year, which equates to £19bn in the first quarter. The figures showed the banks were on course to meet overall business lending targets of £190bn this year, equal to £47.5bn for the quarter, as they lent £47.3bn in the period. However, lending to SMEs fell short at only £16.8bn. Santander is the only bank to have revealed its own lending commitments under the Project Merlin agreement – and is currently on track to hit its targets. A Santander spokeswoman said: “We have pledged to lend £6.7bn to British businesses this year, with £4bn set aside for SMEs. “During the first quarter we provided £2bn of new lending, of which £1.1bn was for SMEs, keeping us well on track to deliver this commitment.” Project Merlin Banking Executive pay and bonuses Lloyds Banking Group Royal Bank of Scotland Barclays HSBC Banco Santander Phillip Inman guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Nick Clegg unveils long-awaited details of green investment bank

Bank will be making green investments within a year and will have independence from Treasury control The UK’s green investment bank will be investing in UK low-carbon infrastructure projects within a year, and is expected to have assisted in injecting £15bn into the green economy within four years, Nick Clegg told a meeting in the City of London on Monday. The deputy prime minister cheered investors by setting out key concessions when announcing the details of the long-awaited new bank, the government’s flagship green policy , which is intended to provide the capital to transform the UK to a low-carbon economy. He said the bank would be set up under legislation, to give it independence from ministers – a major concern for investors, who feared that Treasury plans to avoid legislation and retain control over the bank would spell years of damaging political interference. He also reassured companies that the bank would be able to borrow from April 2015. Clegg said: “We are determined this organisation will be part of the institutional architecture of this country. The green investment bank will go from an idea to a flow of investment in under two years, and quickly grow into an independent investing, and then borrowing, institution. A real legacy of the coalition government’s green commitment.” The initial £3bn of funding from the public purse would also be protected, rather than being subject to the proceeds from asset sales, Clegg said. There had been fears that if planned asset sales did not raise the amounts expected, the bank could suffer. Now it has been underwritten by the Treasury, companies can start to make plans to apply for funding for green projects, including offshore wind farms, waste and industrial energy efficiency. In a further boost to green campaigners, the bank may be used to help finance the green deal scheme, by which householders will have access to loans to carry out energy efficiency refurbishment, paying back the loans in instalments through their energy bills. Campaigners had warned that the green deal would not work if private sector providers were able to charge commercial rates of interest on the loans, as the interest payments would outweigh the savings on energy bills. An independent board of governors for the bank is soon to be announced, with City rumours suggesting it will be led by Sir Adrian Montague, the chairman of 3i. Clegg promised that the bank’s independence would ensure it could “undertake a wide range of transactions, including equity, debt and risk mitigation products”. This would mean that its initial £3bn capital should, by 2014/15, “enable the bank to catalyse an additional £15bn of investment in green infrastructure”, he said. He said the bank would have borrowing powers from April 2015, but only if the government target for debt to be falling as a percentage of GDP had been met by then. Clegg was responding to a chorus of green businesses, investors and campaigners who had raised concerns over the green investment bank , urging ministers to give key assurances that cash will flow into the UK’s low-carbon economy . Rows among ministers anxious to keep control of the new bank have raged for months, with the Treasury tussling to keep the bank small and under its control. One of the options its mandarins had been pushing was that the bank should only be allowed to borrow money from the government, rather than from the private sector – an amendment that investors say would make a nonsense of the institution. Green economy Renewable energy Energy Green politics Fiona Harvey guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Mitch McConnell avoids endorsing the Medicare changes in Paul Ryan’s budget plan, but calls it ‘sensible’

Click here to view this media Mitch McConnell had another chance to wholeheartedly endorse Paul Ryan’s plans to turn Medicare into a voucher system, but he declined to rubber stamp it on Fox News Sunday. He was careful not to enrage the head of the GOP, Rush Limbaugh, by saying said he’d vote for it, but he also made clear that he won’t be enforcing party discipline to line up behind it. He told Chris Wallace that there are plenty of other ideas coming from Senate Republicans like Pat Toomey to choose from. (rough transcript) WALLACE: You say you’re going to vote for it, but you also say you’re not going to push any of your colleagues. Is that because it’s bad policy? MCCONNELL: No, let me tell you, in the Senate we have a bunch of other budgets that Republicans are pushing. Pat Toomey has a very thoughtful ten-year proposal that he likes. He, like I, also supports the Ryan budget. My Kentucky colleague Rand Paul has a budget. What I’ve said to our members are that we’re not going to be able to coalesce behind just one and we may well vote on the Ryan budget. I’m going to make sure that we vote on the Obama budget….there will be votes on several budgets in the Senate. {…} WALLACE: What do you think of the Ryan plan on Medicare? MCCONNELL: Well, what Paul has done here is implement a premium support proposal at the end of the period, which is a very sensible way to go to try and save Medicare. McConnell tries to describe it as a “thoughtful” plan to help save Medicare and it’s the starting point ot have an adult conversation about Medicare. Anytime you hear the phrase “adult conversation” from a Republican, you know it’s almost always going to be about how the working class of America should have to sacrifice in order for the CEO’s and very rich to continue on their own limited path to prosperity. WALLACE: Do you support the idea — you’re exactly right, everybody would agree it’s going to change and they’re going to be cuts of hundreds of millions of dollars either way. Do you support the Ryan concept of turning Medicare from a fee for service plan to a voucher plan, which quite frankly under the CBO analysis means in the long run seniors will end up more out of pocket for health care? MCCONNELL: Paul Ryan would say it’s not a voucher plan, it’s a premium support plan. WALLACE: What’s the difference? MCCONNELL: He says it is different. The point is this Chris, it’s going to change… WALLACE: But you’re not willing to say that you support the Ryan plan? MCCONNELL: What I’m willing to say is that we’re going to have to change Medicare and it’s going to happen soon. New talking point alert: Ryan’s plan is a Premium Support Plan! McConnell would not personally admit what Ryan’s plan actually does. That is, make Medicare a voucher program. That’s what Ryan calls for Medicare to become with his budget, and everybody knows it — including Mitch McConnell. Pushed by Wallace, he refused to embrace it, though, because he understands that politically it’s a huge problem with seniors. So his response is to change the topic and say Medicare has to change.

Continue reading …

With official announcements from Herman Cain on Saturday and Tim Pawlenty this morning, and news of Sarah Palin buying a new house surmised to be potential campaign headquarters in Arizona, do you think a GOP frontrunner will emerge from the pool of candidates any time soon? Check out a roundup of this weekend's GOP announcements and speculation below, and give us your thoughts in the comments: And as reported by Newsmax yesterday, Confirmation of a Palin house purchase in Scottsdale likely would rekindle chatter about whether Palin might run a political campaign out of Arizona, the home state of U.S. Sen. John McCain, who plucked her from relative political obscurity in 2008 to be his vice-presidential running mate, the Republic speculated Sunday. Palin has been rumored to be considering headquartering her 2012 White House campaign, if there is one, in Scottsdale. She also has been mentioned as a possible candidate for the U.S. Senate seat being vacated by the retiring Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz. Perhaps even more important than the viability of any one candidate is whether the current field is a suitable one. For all the handwringing about the absence of a so-called “savior” candidate, prominent right-of-center bloggers such as Erick Erickson and Glenn Reynolds have pushed the “go to the races with the horses we've got” approach. Where do you stand on that question?

Continue reading …