Talk show pioneer. Best selling author. Incredibly successful business woman. Actress. Philanthropist. Billionaire. “Most influential woman in the world.” Oprah Winfrey, the King Midas of her day , is ending her 25-year, multi-award-winning talk show this May, signaling the end of a staple in 21 st century television. But amid all the fawning retrospectives and misty tributes, it's important to remember just who Oprah is, the biased viewpoint she represents and the damage she's done to popular culture. Before Rosanne Barr called Oprah “the African Mother Goddess of us all,” a prominent cultural researcher called her the “Queen of Trash” for the sleazy, exploitative nature of her early show. Since then, the more “uplifting” “Oprah Winfrey Show” has been a more insipid influence, steadily eroding the culture with a combination of weepy emotionalism, New Age spirituality and an embrace of alternative sexualities and gender roles.
Continue reading …Talk show pioneer. Best selling author. Incredibly successful business woman. Actress. Philanthropist. Billionaire. “Most influential woman in the world.” Oprah Winfrey, the King Midas of her day , is ending her 25-year, multi-award-winning talk show this May, signaling the end of a staple in 21 st century television. But amid all the fawning retrospectives and misty tributes, it's important to remember just who Oprah is, the biased viewpoint she represents and the damage she's done to popular culture. Before Rosanne Barr called Oprah “the African Mother Goddess of us all,” a prominent cultural researcher called her the “Queen of Trash” for the sleazy, exploitative nature of her early show. Since then, the more “uplifting” “Oprah Winfrey Show” has been a more insipid influence, steadily eroding the culture with a combination of weepy emotionalism, New Age spirituality and an embrace of alternative sexualities and gender roles.
Continue reading …Shadow defence secretary attacks coalition for keeping public ‘in the dark’ as bipartisan stance on Libya suffers first serious split The deployment of Apache attack helicopters to Libya represents a “serious escalation” of the conflict, the shadow defence secretary, Jim Murphy, has warned. In the first major breach in the bipartisan approach to the bombing campaign, Murphy attacked the government for keeping the public and parliament in the dark about the deployment of the helicopters. Other MPs warned of “mission creep” and said the deployment showed that the NATO operation is now seeking to overthrow the Gaddafi regime rather than simply to protect civilians in Libya. Nick Harvey, the Liberal Democrat armed forces minister, was summoned to parliament to answer questions after the Guardian reported that Britain and France are to deploy the helicopters against Libya in an attempt to break the stalemate. Liam Fox, the defence secretary, is on an official visit to Washington. Harvey told MPs that Britain had not decided whether to deploy the helicopters. But a source from the Ministry of Defence said: “The chances are it is going to happen.” Murphy rounded on the government after Gérard Longuet, the French defence minister, said France would deploy 12 helicopters. Le Figaro quoted Longuet as saying that Britain would make a similar commitment and that Britain’s thinking was “the sooner the better”. The shadow defence secretary said: “The British people will desperately be concerned that French ministers seem to know about the deployment of British military equipment [sooner] than the British parliament. “Parliament hasn’t written the government a blank cheque on Libya. Ministers should never keep the British public in the dark on major deployments. This is a serious moment. It would be a serious escalation if such a commitment were to be made. Parliament should not and should never be kept in the dark.” Harvey insisted no decision has been made. “For the avoidance of all doubt, no such decision has been taken by the UK,” he said. “It is an option we are considering. No decision has been taken and there is absolutely no sense in which it is not true to say that we have kept parliament in the dark about a decision we have taken.” The armed forces minister said deploying the helicopters would not mark an escalation in the conflict. “I do not accept that if we were to take a decision at some point to use attack helicopters that that would be an escalation of what we are doing in Libya,” he said. “The targets would remain the same. It would simply be a tactical shift in what assets we use to try and hit those targets.” But Harvey said that deploying Apache helicopters would have major advantages. “The principal advantage it would give us over what we are doing at the moment would be the ability to strike moving targets with greater precision than we are able to, using the air assets we are currently deploying.” Others MPs warned that the NATO mission was now designed to overthrow Muammar Gaddafi. David Winnick, the Labour MP for Walsall North, said: “Despite denials, UN security council resolution 1973 is in fact being used for regime change. Regime change is totally outside international law.” John Barron, the Conservative MP for Basildon and Billericay, said: “Whether or not we deploy Apache helicopters, the fact that a key NATO ally has represents a significant escalation in this conflict and reinforces the point that regime change has been the aim of our intervention.” Dennis Skinner, the Labour MP for Bolsover, said: “Hasn’t this intervention been subject to mission creep ever since it began? The statements that have been made in this house have indicated that – a little bit of help here, special forces there, further intervention. “Now the French, who initiated this intervention in the first place because of an election in France next year – there is no surprise to me that they are now telling the British government what the next phase is.” Chris Bryant, Labour’s former Europe minister, warned of a stalemate. He said: “The trouble is that if the government’s aim is not regime change then it is basically stalemate. How long is that stalemate going to go on?” Bernard Jenkin, the former Tory shadow defence secretary, issued a similar warning. “We either have to break the stalemate or broker a peace,” he said. Other MPs were supportive. Nicholas Soames, the former Tory defence minister, said: “The deployment, were it to happen, of the Apache would be entirely appropriate given particularly the change in tactics of the Gaddafi forces. [There is] the requirement to have a highly effective machine that is able to deal with the hard-to-find targets.” Sir Menzies Campbell, the former Lib Dem leader, said: “Were Apache helicopters to be deployed, which, after all, carry missiles, what would the difference in principle be between that and the use of fast jets carrying missiles?” Foreign policy Liberal-Conservative coalition Jim Murphy Labour Military Libya Middle East Africa Hélène Mulholland guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …I’m not sure how many more of these miners have to die before someone from Massey Energy finally goes to jail, but it’s been over a year now and no one’s been prosecuted yet. From Democracy Now — Massey Energy Guilty: West Virginia Probe Finds Coal Giant Systemically Failed to Comply with Law : An independent state probe in West Virginia concludes that mining giant, Massey Energy, was responsible for the April 2010 explosion that killed 29 underground coal mining workers. It echoes preliminary findings by federal investigators earlier this year that Massey repeatedly violated federal rules on ventilation and minimizing coal dust to reduce the risk of explosion, and rejects Massey’s claim that a burst of gas from a hole in the mine floor was at fault. The report also notes Massey’s strong political influence, which it uses “to attempt to control West Virginia’s political system” and regulatory bodies. We speak with J. Davitt McAteer, who oversaw the probe and is a former top federal mine safety official. AMY GOODMAN: We’re talking to Davitt McAteer, lead author of the Massey report. He’s joining us from his home in West Virginia. I hope you will bear with the problems with the sound. You say miners didn’t have air and that Massey didn’t care. Explain. J. DAVITT McATEER: When we interviewed some 220 miners after the ignition, after the explosion, as part of the investigation, repeatedly the miners said, “We don’t have enough air coming to us in the mine.” Now, remember, the mine is divided into three, four, five sections, so that miners in various sections would, from day to day, have problems with the ventilation, and it would be very hot and would be very difficult to work. The ventilation system was not kept up properly. The ventilation system was not maintained properly. Some of the courses of the air were not sent to the miners’ locations on a regular basis. And there were changes made, on an ad hoc basis, on a daily basis, by foremen in order to try to get air to those individuals. What this means is that the air is not in a steady, constant prevention method and that the mine—sections of the mine can have methane buildup when in fact the air isn’t coursing through like it should. In addition, over the Easter weekend that preceded this explosion, there was a problem with some of the pumps on the surface, and water built up in the back end of the mine. That water buildup will, in effect, negatively impact the ventilation system. It’ll indeed block the ventilation system, so that the ventilation system becomes less effective. Those two factors, we believe, were involved in the day of the explosion. AMY GOODMAN: You report, Davitt McAteer, that most of the coal miners who were killed, the 29, who varied in age from 25 to 61 years old, had black lung disease. Explain what that is and the significance of this. J. DAVITT McATEER: Black lung disease is a disease that coal miners have suffered for centuries. And it is essentially the inhalation of submicron particles of dust that adhere to the lungs and create an inability of the lungs to exchange oxygen. It occurs in miners who are exposed to levels of coal dust that are above the standard level, 2.0 milligrams per cubic meter. And it occurs in these—in this instance, we found, in this group of miners, some 26 of the miners had some sign of black lung, and that is an astounding number, when you consider that as a general matter, in the population of the country as a whole, it’s three percent, and in the population in West Virginia, it’s roughly six-and-a-half or seven percent. We were shocked by this finding and shocked by the age of the miners who had it. These are quite young miners, and these are some miners who don’t have much experience underground. So it was disturbing to us, and it is disturbing to us, that we have this potential problem, and it’s something that we need to look at very carefully. AMY GOODMAN: More than a year after the 29 men died at Massey, at Upper Big Branch Mine, there is strong evidence that Massey has not changed the manner in which it runs these mines. On April 29th, 2011, after receiving tips on its hotline, MSHA, the Mining Safety Health Administration, conducted an impact inspection and found 20 instances of aggravated misconduct at Massey subsidiary Inman Energy’s Randolph coal mine in Boone County, West Virginia. During the safety blitz, the agency issued 20 withdrawal notices, five citations. Eleven orders had to do with violations of the ventilation plan at the mine. The inspectors found the company was illegally operating two sets of mining equipment simultaneously and cutting, mining and loading coal from the same section. What is the significance of this, and how dangerous is this in the continuation of how Massey operates? J. DAVITT McATEER: The Randolph mine is just a few miles from the Upper Big Branch Mine. All of those miners and all of those supervisory people are well aware of what happened at the Upper Big Branch Mine. The fact that we continue to have problems is shocking, in that there has not been a message sent by the management of Massey Energy to its people to say it is absolutely critical that we put safety in the first position. And that failure to make a change seems to me to suggest that we have not learned a lesson that we have to learn, if we are to mine coal safely in this country. It was really disturbing for us working on the report to see the Randolph mine up the road have the same kinds of problems and similar serious problems to what preceded the explosion at the Upper Big Branch Mine. AMY GOODMAN: What do you want to happen to your report, Davitt McAteer? Where should this go? And do you think that, based on what you found, which is clearly, in this 120-page report, gross negligence, there should be criminal prosecutions? J. DAVITT McATEER: That’s the decision of a U.S. attorney, and I believe they’re aggressively pursuing that. The second aspect that we are interested in is to see that there be some legislation on a federal level and on a state level to address the shortcomings that we point out in the report, one of which, for example, is the fact that we don’t have responsibility in the boardroom for safety and health. We have responsibility in the boardroom for economics and for finance, but we don’t have responsibility in the board of this company or the other companies for safety and health, and that needs to change. Secondly, we need to introduce new technologies into the mining system. We’re still scratching on pieces of paper problematic signs that occur underground. We don’t have, for example, black boxes on any of the mining equipment to provide us with information after a disaster happens as to what went on. And so, we need to make those changes. Secondly, we need to make a change at the regulatory agency, and that change needs to be to strengthen the regulations dealing with coal dust, dealing with rock dust, and dealing with ventilation. Third, the industry itself has to make the changes. The industry, the mining industry in this country, if they’re going to continue to operate, have to be operating in a safer manner. We know how to do it. We have done it, and companies do it day in and day out. But companies also disregard the mine safety laws. The industry itself has to police itself and get itself—get its house in order, so that we don’t have, in the 21st century, the death of 29 miners in one fell swoop. Read on…
Continue reading …Hey there, NBers. Time for Tuesday's all-new episode of NewsBusted. As usual, make sure you subscribe to our YouTube channel or embed your own 'Busted widget for all of Jodi's latest comedic stylings. Enjoy! Topics in today's show: — Rapture? — Obama's fundraising troubles — Obama wants Israel to return to 1967 borders — Speaking at CIA, Obama uses 35 first person pronouns — Frisco to vote on circumcision ban — Arnold's illegitimate child — Stephen Hawking doesn't believe in Heaven or Hell Starring: Jodi Miller Director: Bruce Roundtower Production: Dialog New Media
Continue reading …Hey there, NBers. Time for Tuesday's all-new episode of NewsBusted. As usual, make sure you subscribe to our YouTube channel or embed your own 'Busted widget for all of Jodi's latest comedic stylings. Enjoy! Topics in today's show: — Rapture? — Obama's fundraising troubles — Obama wants Israel to return to 1967 borders — Speaking at CIA, Obama uses 35 first person pronouns — Frisco to vote on circumcision ban — Arnold's illegitimate child — Stephen Hawking doesn't believe in Heaven or Hell Starring: Jodi Miller Director: Bruce Roundtower Production: Dialog New Media
Continue reading …Hey there, NBers. Time for Tuesday's all-new episode of NewsBusted. As usual, make sure you subscribe to our YouTube channel or embed your own 'Busted widget for all of Jodi's latest comedic stylings. Enjoy! Topics in today's show: — Rapture? — Obama's fundraising troubles — Obama wants Israel to return to 1967 borders — Speaking at CIA, Obama uses 35 first person pronouns — Frisco to vote on circumcision ban — Arnold's illegitimate child — Stephen Hawking doesn't believe in Heaven or Hell Starring: Jodi Miller Director: Bruce Roundtower Production: Dialog New Media
Continue reading …Twenty minutes was not enough for Joplin residents to prepare for what was about to happen: Reporting from Joplin, Mo.— When the tornado hit, Staci Perry, a scrub technician at St. John’s Regional Medical Center, had just left the operating room to grab a piece of equipment for a surgery in progress. An urgent announcement came over the loudspeaker: “Execute condition gray.” That was the hospital’s code for an impending disaster, though in drills, the command was always preceded by “Prepare for condition gray.” There was no time to prepare. As she heard the massive glass walls crack, Perry, 33, dashed back to surgery. “The pressure in everyone’s ears was just tremendous,” she said. A physician’s assistant threw himself against the door so it wouldn’t blow in and destroy the operating room. The lights went out. The wind howled. “Literally, the hospital imploded,” said Dr. Jim Riscoe, an emergency room physician at the 230-bed facility. There is an emergency plan for disasters, he said, “but they don’t anticipate the emergency being the hospital.” When it was over, just after 5:30 p.m. Sunday, the storm had gouged a six-mile swath roughly half a mile wide in this city of 50,000. At least 116 people died, five of them hospital patients. The apocalyptic after-images were depressingly familiar, reminiscent of those from the deadly April tornadoes in the South: rubble as far as the eye could see, cars buried under pieces of houses, trees wrenched from the ground with massive roots reaching toward the sky, columns of smoke rising from gas fires, emergency vehicles with lights flashing. And everywhere, knots of people stunned by nature’s violence mourned their losses, counted their blessings and told their harrowing stories. In torrential rain, lightning and heavy winds, rescuers went door-to-door on Monday, gingerly avoiding debris and downed power lines that ignited fires fueled by leaking gas. They pulled 17 survivors from the rubble, officials said. Joplin officials said more than 2,000 structures were ripped apart and whole neighborhoods obliterated in what was described as the worst tornado ever to hit Missouri. Power remained out Monday on most of the city’s west side. Residents were advised to boil water . If you can help, you can send donations here: Collecting monetary donations is the best way to help Joplin, according to Polk County Emergency Management Director Rick Lewis. After last night’s tornado that damaged or destroyed about 30 percent of the southwest Missouri town , several area organizations and churches are collecting money, food and supplies.“With money, they can feed people or do whatever they need to do,” Lewis said. “If [people] don’t know where to send donations, they can send them through [Polk County Emergency Management] to PO Box 181, Bolivar MO 65613, marked Joplin.” Or send donations to the American Red Cross .
Continue reading …