Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 1028)
AP’s Rugaber Doesn’t Like DOL’s Lack of Excuses for Rise in Initial Unemployment Claims, Makes One Up

It would appear, according to the Associated Press's Christopher Rugaber, that something unusual had to explain why initial unemployment claims as reported by Uncle Sam's Department of Labor rose to a seasonally adjusted 424,000 during the week ended May 21 when they were expected to decline . In previous weeks, poor performances have been explained by DOL spokespersons as due to the unusually late Easter, the weather, Japanese supply interruptions, and Jupiter not being aligned with Mars (okay, I'm kidding about the last one). Apparently, one thing is for certain in AP-Land: The troubling 400,000-plus plateau in weekly initial claims can't possibly have anything to do with Obama administration's economic policies (or lack thereof). Today, as Bloomberg noted , the Department of Labor offered up no excuses: “There were no special factors behind last week’s increase, a Labor Department official said as the figures were released.” Rugaber wasn't satisfied with that answer, and decided he would roll out one of his own without any evidence. The AP reporter has also developed a strange obsession with reminding everyone on a weekly basis when initial claims peaked (bolds are mine): The number of people seeking benefits rose by 10,000 to a seasonally adjusted 424,000, the Labor Department said Thursday. No states cited extreme weather as a factor in the increase, a department spokesman said. Tornadoes and floods have devastated several states in the Midwest and South in the past month.

Continue reading …
May 26, 1945 – The San Francisco Peace Conference.

enlarge Credit: United Nations Photo Edward Stitinius (L) and Tom Connolly (C) and nervous aide (R). Harbinger of things to come . Click here to view this media This day in 1945 the San Francisco Peace conference was getting underway, laying the groundwork for what would become the United Nations Charter. With war still going on in the Pacific, delegates from Europe, the Middle East, Africa and South America met to establish a means of working together as a Post-War world was coming into view. But even then, even as the war was continuing, suspicions were raised over the future relationship between the U.S. and the Soviet Union. Was all this euphoria going to last? Some didn’t think so. And even Assistant Secretary of State Archibald MacLeish made mention of it in this broadcast, part of a radio series devoted to the San Francisco Conference and our Foreign Policy. Archibald MacLeish (Asst. Sec. of State): “Political events in Europe are regarded in some quarters not only as denying the promise of San Francisco but as qualifying the hope that the continuing collaboration between the great powers, upon which San Francisco is based, can continue. Certain commentators have even spoken openly of an inevitable conflict of interest between the Russians and ourselves, and have debated the question whether Russia, our present ally in this war, is our enemy or our friend. A curious debate, one would think, with our soldiers living side by side in conquered Germany and our common dead but freshly buried.” Interesting when you consider the Cold War became a reality not that long after these suspicions were cast. Interesting too, when you consider many members of the State Department at the time, including Alger Hiss, were hounded out of the State Department and labeled Communist operatives, triggering the Witch Hunts and Red Scare that permeated our National psyche for the better part of four decades. But it all started out so optimistically. Here is “Report From San Francisco – Part 5″ as broadcast on May 26, 1945.

Continue reading …
Ed Schultz Apologizes for Calling Laura Ingraham a ‘Right Wing Slut’ on His Radio Show

Click here to view this media As reported earlier, Ed Schultz found himself in some hot water for calling right wing radio host and Fox pundit Laura Ingraham a “right wing slut” on his radio show this Tuesday . Schultz apologized tonight during the intro to his nightly television show on MSNBC. MSNBC has suspended Schultz for one week without pay for the incident. While I cannot and do not condone the kind of sexist remark made by Schultz and there is no excuse for what he said, someone let me know when anyone on right wing radio or over at Fox ever gets some time off or apologizes for the kind of sexist or racist remarks we hear out of their mouths on a weekly basis, will you?

Continue reading …

The Judge is working hard to get off of Fox Business and onto Fox News Channel, because they have much better ratings , but he’s as charismatic as a soggy doughnut and as quacky as Glenn Beck. He’s been hammering away at not raising the debt ceiling for months now and he has the full stable of FN Pundits at his disposal. Here’s his latest attack on our social safety nets, programs that we pay into by the way. He likes to quote the Founding Fathers quite a bit, but dismisses Presidents who saw American seniors dying in the streets and average Americans struggling to live with bad health before and after the stock market crash and were smart enough to do something about it. It took a while to do, but they’ve been tremendous for our society. The CapoNapo is making the argument that the US is stealing from you . Napolitano Asks Why The US Should Provide Emergency Health Care, Compares It To Theft And Slavery or won’t pay for it themselves, that’s slavery. Napolitano: When the government forces hospitals and physicians to provide free health care for those who can’t. That’s why we have constitutionally chaos now. The government steals and enslaves and we outlawed that a long time ago .

Continue reading …
Academies and free schools get right to reserve places for poorer pupils

New code designed to stop middle-income families moving near to popular schools – but other state schools miss out on cash Academy and free schools will be allowed to reserve places for children entitled to free meals under a new admissions code published by the Department for Education. It gives those schools – but not other state schools – the right to take children whose families’ annual income is £16,190 or below rather than those from better-off families. The current code forbids all state schools from choosing pupils based on their family income. Academies and free schools stand to gain financially over other schools. The coalition last year introduced the pupil premium , which entitles schools to £430 for each pupil on free school meals. A source from the Department for Education (DfE) said the move was designed to stop middle-income families moving near to popular schools and monopolising their intake. A spokesman said children eligible for free school meals often came from “the most vulnerable groups and had parents who often lack the resources to help them access our more successful schools”. It was one of the government’s priorities to break the “cycle of deprivation”. “We wish to give a permissive approach to those schools who believe that children eligible for free school meals would thrive in their educational care,” he said. The journalist Toby Young said he hoped the governing body of his free school in Hammersmith and Fulham, west London, which is likely to open by September, would set aside a quarter of places for children on free school meals.. He welcomed the change. “We want the West London Free School to be a genuine comprehensive, reflecting the social diversity of the local area, and this will enable us to achieve that.” But Fiona Millar, a founder of the Local Schools Network, said it was unfair that academies and free schools were subject to different rules. “There should be one admissions code. If schools that aren’t academies or free schools want to give more places to pupils on free school meals, they should be allowed to.” Ministers are likely to have modelled the change on KIPP charter schools in the US which specifically target poorer children. The DfE source said it would be up to individual academies and free schools to decide whether they wanted to offer a proportion of places to the poorest pupils and no quota would be imposed from Whitehall. They would offer places to pupils on free school meals who applied to their school, rather than select them. However, Alan McMurdo, principal of Thomas Deacon academy in Peterborough, said that his school already ensured a comprehensive intake by setting all prospective pupils a verbal reasoning test, dividing pupils into 10 “bands” according to their results and taking the same number from each band. “Although we welcome the flexibility that this brings, we feel duty-bound to keep to the admissions arrangements we have,” he said. “Our banding system ensures that we are not seduced into taking swathes of higher-income children.” Earlier this week, Michael Gove, the education secretary, told the Guardian that more parents would get their first choice of school under the code. He said the government planned to “remove bureaucracy” around the expansion of good schools. Weaker schools would feel the squeeze, he said. School admissions Academies Education policy Schools Free schools Poverty Liberal-Conservative coalition Michael Gove Jessica Shepherd guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Tim Pawlenty, Social Media Failure

Tim Pawlenty needs more than Republicans to win the Presidency, but I can pretty much guarantee this tactic will fail, and fail miserably with independents and moderate Republicans. Tweeted earlier : enlarge Now if TPaw had been paying attention, he would have noticed that Medicare was reformed significantly by the Affordable Care Act. And if he were really paying attention, he would have noticed that our President was the first United States President invited to speak at a joint session of Parliament yesterday. Hardly a “pub crawl.” Poor TPaw just can’t seem to find a message that works. Or a social media strategy that makes any sense, for that matter.

Continue reading …
Ex-Clinton aide storms off Fox News set during Medicare debate

Click here to view this media Simon Rosenberg, a former advisor to President Bill Clinton, decided Thursday that he wasn’t going to be pushed around by conservative radio host Ben Ferguson during a discussion about Medicare on Fox News. Fox News’ Shannon Bream had invited Rosenberg to respond to video published by ABC News that showed Clinton telling Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) that he hoped Democrats wouldn’t use a Democratic congressional win in New York as “an excuse to do nothing” on reforming Medicare. “Does that hurt the current administration’s efforts and what Democrats in the White House are trying to do, with President Clinton suggesting maybe they do stop the fear mongering and get to work?” Bream asked. “I don’t think that anything that’s happened in the last few months is fear mongering,” Rosenberg replied. “Dumping a woman off a cliff isn’t fear mongering,” Ferguson interrupted, referring to an ad by The Agenda Project that shows a Paul Ryan lookalike pushing an elderly woman in a wheelchair off a cliff. Rosenberg calmly quoted Clinton as saying that under the Ryan plan, “medical costs will continue to go up and older people will use less, get sicker and die quicker or they will be poorer because they will have to spend more money on health care.” “That’s fear mongering,” Ferguson interrupted again. “Ben, shut up. It’s unbelievable how much you talk,” a frustrated Rosenberg said. “It’s not fear mongering. It is a factual, correct interpretation of the Ryan plan. The Ryan plan is bad public policy. It would have killed people prematurely. That’s fact.” After Ferguson interrupted yet again, Bream asked that Rosenberg be allowed to finish his answer. “Why should I come on this show if I can’t talk?” Rosenberg asked. “You can pout and that’s what you guys do well at,” Ferguson charged. With that, Rosenberg took off his microphone and walked off the set.

Continue reading …
Tim Pawlenty Would Vote To Kill Medicare

enlarge And thus, Pawlenty kisses good bye his presidential aspirations : After facing criticism in recent days for sidestepping the issue, Tim Pawlenty today in New Hampshire said if he were president and Rep. Paul Ryan’s budget proposal came to his desk, he would sign it. The Pawlenty team is circulating the following remarks that the former Minnesota governor made to a scrum of reporters in the Granite state: “First of all, I applaud Congressman Ryan for his courage and his leadership in putting his plan forward. At least he has a plan. President Obama doesn’t have a plan. The Democrats don’t have a plan. And I really applaud his leadership and his courage in putting a plan on the table. Number two, we will have our own plan; it will have many similarities to Congressman Ryan’s plan, but it will have some differences, one of which will be we’ll address Social Security. He chose not to; we are addressing Social Security. And the Medicare part of our plan will have some differences, too. It will have some similarities also. So we’ll have our own plan. But if I can’t have my own plan — as president, I’ll have my own plan – if I can’t have that, and the bill came to my desk and I had to choose between signing or not Congressman Ryan’s plan, of course I would sign it.” Because, you know, standing tall with killing Medicare as we know it has played so well with the voters. Just ask Jane Corwin . Brilliant strategy there, Tim.

Continue reading …
The 2011 Guardian Music Power 100 – interactive

Who are the people exercising the greatest influence over the UK’s listening habits right now? Christine Oliver

Continue reading …
The 2011 Guardian Music Power 100 – interactive

Who are the people exercising the greatest influence over the UK’s listening habits right now? Christine Oliver

Continue reading …