Home » Archives by category » News (Page 954)
France’s burqa ban: women are ‘effectively under house arrest’

Since France introduced its burqa ban in April there have been violent attacks on women wearing the niqab and, this week, the first fines could be handed down. But a legal challenge to this hard line may yet expose the French state as a laughing stock Hind Ahmas walks into a brasserie in the north Paris suburb of Aulnay-sous-Bois. Jaws drop, shoulders tighten and a look of disgust ripples across the faces of haggard men sipping coffee at the bar. “Hang on, what’s all this? Isn’t that banned?” splutters the outraged waiter behind the bar, waving a wine bottle at her niqab. Ahmas stands firm, clutches her handbag with black-gloved hands and says: “Call the police then.” But she decides there’s no point fighting. We cross the road to a cafe where she’s a regular. No one bats an eyelid; the boss certainly doesn’t want to lose her custom. Ahmas is breaking the law by ordering an espresso and sitting in a booth in the window. But these days she is breaking the law by stepping outside her own front door. In April, France introduced a law against covering your face in public. Muslim women in full-face veils, or niqab, are now banned from any public activity including walking down the street, taking a bus, going to the shops or collecting their children from school. French politicians in favour of the ban said they were acting to protect the “gender equality” and “dignity” of women. But five months after the law was introduced, the result is a mixture of confusion and apathy. Muslim groups report a worrying increase in discrimination and verbal and physical violence against women in veils. There have been instances of people in the street taking the law into their hands and trying to rip off full-face veils, of bus drivers refusing to carry women in niqab or of shop-owners trying to bar entry. A few women have taken to wearing bird-flu-style medical masks to keep their face covered; some describe a climate of divisiveness, mistrust and fear. One politician who backed the law said that women still going out in niqab were simply being “provocative”. Ahmas, 32, French, a divorced single mother of a three-year-old daughter, puts her handbag on the table and takes out a pepper spray and attack alarm. She doesn’t live on the high-rise estates but on a quiet street of semi-detached houses. The last time she was attacked in the street a man and woman punched her in front of her daughter, called her a whore and told her to go back to Afghanistan. “My quality of life has seriously deteriorated since the ban. In my head, I have to prepare for war every time I step outside, prepare to come up against people who want to put a bullet in my head. The politicians claimed they were liberating us; what they’ve done is to exclude us from the social sphere. Before this law, I never asked myself whether I’d be able to make it to a cafe or collect documents from a town hall. One politician in favour of the ban said niqabs were ‘walking prisons’. Well, that’s exactly where we’ve been stuck by this law.” But despite all the fanfare surrounding the niqab ban, no woman has yet been punished under the law for wearing one. The first real test will come on Thursday, when a local judge in Meaux, east of Paris, will decide whether to hand out to Ahmas and a friend the first ever fine. They were stopped outside Meaux town hall on 5 May wearing niqabs and carrying an almond cake to celebrate the birthday of the local mayor Jean-François Copé, who is also head of Nicolas Sarkozy’s rightwing UMP party and an architect of the ban. The cake was a joke, a play on the French word for fine, amende . They wanted to highlight the absurdity of a law that they say has increased a mood of anti-Muslim discrimination and driven a wedge through French society, yet seems not to have been taken seriously by the justice system. Sarkozy was accused of stigmatising women in niqab to win votes from the extreme right, yet the law didn’t actually boost his poll ratings. Now, human rights lawyers are suggesting it could soon be overturned. Only the French police can confront a woman in niqab. They can’t remove her veil but must refer the case to a local judge, who can hand out a ¤150 (£130) fine, a citizenship course, or both. Some police have wrongly given on-the-spot fines, which were later annulled. Others appear to ignore women in niqab walking down the street, perhaps because they feel they have more important crimes to be stopping. The interior ministry says that since the law came into force in April there have been 91 incidents of women in niqab being stopped by police outside Paris and nine incidents in the Paris region. Each time, police file a report, but so far no judge has handed out a fine or citizenship course. The French justice ministry says “fewer than 10″ cases are currently going through the courts and the lack of fines shows the state favours “dialogue” not punishment. But Gilles Devers, a lawyer acting for Ahmas and several other women in niqab, argued punishments were not being handed out because the niqab law contravenes European human rights legislation on personal liberties and freedom of religion. As soon as a fine is imposed, there will be an appeal right up to the European court of human rights in Strasbourg, which could rule against the law and expose the French state as a laughing stock. If the French law is challenged in this way, the result would be crucial for Muslims across the continent. Belgium introduced its own niqab ban this summer, punishable not just by a fine but seven days in prison. In Italy, the far-right Northern League has resuscitated a 1975 law against face coverings to fine women in certain areas of the north. Silvio Berlusconi’s party is now preparing an anti-niqab law. Denmark is preparing legislation to limit the wearing of niqabs; politicians in Austria, the Netherlands and Switzerland are pushing for outright bans. Thomas Hammarberg, the Council of Europe’s commissioner for human rights, blogged this summer : “The way the dress of a small number of women has been portrayed as a key problem requiring urgent discussion and legislation is a sad capitulation to the prejudices of the xenophobes.” Ahmas grew up in and around Paris, where her father, born in Morocco, worked as a town-hall gardener. Her parents were not strict Muslims. She put on the niqab six years ago as an educated single woman who once wore mini-skirts and liked partying, but then rediscovered her faith. She says her now ex-husband had nothing to do with her choice. (The new law punishes men who force women to wear the niqab with a ¤30,000 fine, but none has yet been imposed.) Like many women in niqab who refuse to stay indoors, she is desperate for work. For years, she worked in call centres as a specialist in telephone polling. Even before the ban, she knew it would be easier to get work without the niqab, so at the office she would always pull back her veil, leaving her face exposed for the day. “Life is hard and I have to work. If my daughter wants something – even a Barbie doll – and I can’t pay for it, it breaks my heart.” In January, at the height of the public debate on the niqab, Ahmas lost her job after her contract wasn’t renewed. “I’ve contacted scores of employers looking for work. I always ask them if they accept the veil. They say, ‘It depends what type. If it’s tunic and trousers and a headscarf, that’s OK, but a long robe is not.’” This is clear discrimination: “Totally illegal,” she sighs. Secular France has a complicated relationship with the veil. In 2004, all religious symbols including the headscarf were banned in schools. Even among Sarkozy’s opponents there are very few feminists or socialist politicians who would defend the right to wear niqab in a country where secularism is one of the few issues that still unites a fragmented left. Barely a handful of people came to Notre Dame cathedral to protest against the law in April. On the Cote d’Azur, Stéphanie, 31, still likes to go swimming in the sea off Nice wearing her niqab. But the former law student and convert to Islam tries to go when the beaches are quiet. The last time she went for a dip with her mother and 10-year-old daughter on a Sunday afternoon, a sunbather called the police. A group of officers arrived and hurried across the sand saying: “But Madame, what are you doing?” “I said: ‘I’m drying myself.’ They wrote in their notebooks, ‘Swimming in niqab.’” Stephanie, who prefers not to give her surname, was summoned by the local state prosecutor. She arrived at court and agreed to lift her veil so security guards could check her identity, but they refused to allow her access until an exasperated prosecutor buzzed her in himself. The prosecutor, whom she described as “very human”, wanted to better understand why she wore the niqab. She converted at 17 and put on the niqab several years later, long before meeting her husband. Her North African parents-in-law didn’t like her wearing full-veil, and the marriage ended. Her own parents converted to Islam a few years later but don’t believe a niqab is necessary. She told the prosecutor it was her choice and refused to stop wearing niqab. The prosecutor reminded her of the law and let her go with no sanction or punishment. He told the local paper, Nice Matin , that a woman in a veil was less dangerous than someone who had “double or triple parked”. Before the law, Stephanie would often be called names like “Batman, Zorro, or Ninja” in the street – often by pensioners. Now people favour swear words or sexual insults. She wants to work with children, but despite having a degree in theology, she can’t find a job. The first time Stephanie was stopped by police was for standing on a central Nice shopping street in May. A police officer illegally gave her an on-the-spot fine, which was later overturned. This summer, a bus driver refused to let her onto a bus with her daughter. “If I have a meeting, I’ll always leave the house at 6.30am instead of 8.30am in case a bus won’t take me and I have to wait 45 minutes for another one.” Recently, after she had bought a cinema ticket for the latest Harry Potter film with her daughter, staff tried to stop her entering the screening. Eventually the cinema decided not to call the police because they didn’t want to feature in the local paper. The headquarters of the French Collective against Islamophobia is in a small ground-floor office on a cobbled street near Paris’s Gare de L’Est. It doesn’t promote the wearing of niqab but gives legal advice. “It’s not the police I’m afraid of, it’s the personal attacks on women by people acting on their own initiative in the street,” says Samy Debah, the association’s head. The group’s legal adviser says there has been “an explosion” in the number of physical attacks on women wearing the niqab. Many women say that their attackers were middle-aged or old people. In one recent case a young French convert was assaulted at a zoo outside Paris while carrying her 13-month-old baby. “Her child was traumatised by the zoo attack and is now being seen by a psychologist. These women blame themselves; they see a baby in that situation and think, ‘It’s my fault.’” At a cafe on the left bank, Rachid Nekkaz, a French property developer, explains why his association, Don’t Touch my Constitution, was the only group to stage high-profile protests when the law came into force – he backed Ahmas’s birthday-cake stunt and has set up a ¤1m fund to pay any fines over the niqab. His next, and most radical, protest action will be this Thursday, when his association announces its plans to field a woman in niqab for president in 2012. Nekkaz is personally opposed to the niqab and thinks it is fair to ban it in French state buildings. But he thinks outlawing it in all public places is “a gross attack on personal freedoms and the French constitution”. “The perverse effect of this law is that women in niqab are effectively under house arrest,” he says. He plays a voicemail message left on his mobile by the mother of French convert, thanking him for taking a stand and saying there are several converts in niqab in Grenoble now too afraid to leave the house. There are no reliable statistics on who wears the niqab in France and whether they have kept wearing it since the law. It is estimated that only a few hundred women wear it, mostly French citizens. Muslim associations say a minority of women have taken off the niqab or moved abroad. Nekkaz says that more than 290 women still wearing niqab have contacted him: he says a large number were divorced with children, most were aged between 25 and 35, many were French of north African parentage, and many were living on income support. An Open Society Foundation report on women in niqabs in France in April found that of a sample of 32 women in niqab, none had been forced to wear the full veil. Many said they would refuse to take if off after the law came in, adding that they would avoid leaving home, or move abroad. Kenza Drider, a 32-year-old mother of three, was famously bold enough to appear on French television to oppose the law before it came into force. She refuses to take off her niqab – “My husband doesn’t dictate what I do, much less the government” – but she says she now lives in fear of attack. “I still go out in my car, on foot, to the shops, to collect my kids. I’m insulted about three to four times a day,” she says. Most say, “Go home”; some say, “We’ll kill you.” One said: “We’ll do to you what we did to the Jews.” In the worst attack, before the law came in, a man tried to run her down in his car. “I feel that I now know what Jewish women went through before the Nazi roundups in France. When they went out in the street they were identified, singled out, they were vilified. Now that’s happening to us.” French burqa and niqab ban France Islam Religion Women Angelique Chrisafis guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Stock markets and euro slide on Greek debt fears

• Lenders threaten to pull plug on further bailouts • Finance minister promises reforms and cost-cutting Europe’s failure to resolve its spiralling debt crisis saw stock markets and the euro fall sharply on Monday amid fears that Greece, the country at the centre of the drama, was veering towards default. Investors watched closely as a crucial teleconference between the Greek finance minister and Athens’ international creditors got under way tonight in a desperate bid by the cash-strapped nation to secure more funds to keep afloat. European stock markets were down heavily with the FTSE 100 in London closing down more than 100 points at 5259. The Dow Jones industrial average was down more than 200 points in afternoon trading amid warnings from the US treasury secretary, Tim Geithner, that the euro crisis was affecting American business confidence. The oil price fell $2.20 to $85.76 in New York, while the euro dropped at one point as low as $1.3586, approaching last week’s seven-month low of $1.3495. At stake for Greece is an €8bn (£7bn) rescue loan – the sixth instalment of a €110bn package that Greece received in May 2010 – and a second bailout worth €109bn that the European Union, European Central Bank (ECB) and International Monetary Fund (IMF) also approved to prop up an economy viewed as insolvent. Before the start of the two-hour talks, the finance minister, Evangelos Venizelos, had emphasised that he would stress Greece’s commitment to meeting its debt obligations. He attempted to douse anger over Athens’ failure to implement long-overdue reforms by insisting that the socialist government would faithfully implement cost-cutting policies prescribed by the country’s “troika” of lenders, the EU, ECB and IMF. “If we don’t make such changes now we will have to make them later in circumstances that will be possibly uncontrollable and much worse,” Venizelos told the conference attended by IMF officials in Athens. With lenders threatening to block further aid, a barrage of further austerity measures were to be the focus of the televised talks, according to Greek media. Venizelos described the conference call as “a productive and substantive discussion”, saying “tomorrow morning, the teams of technical experts in Athens will further elaborate on some data and the conference call will be repeated tomorrow at the same time”. International inspectors, who abruptly suspended a visit to Athens three weeks ago in frustration over the emergence of budget shortfalls, had made clear that they will not return until they are convinced that the government is intent on pursuing reforms in return for aid. Without implementation of measures that include the privatization of state assets and deregulation of the labour market, EU officials believe neither Greece’s economy nor culture will ever change. The budget deficit originally projected at 7.4% for this year is now expected to be nearer 10%.Under unprecedented pressure during a meeting of EU finance ministers in Poland at the weekend, the beleaguered government agreed to fast-track reforms – outlined in a contentious ‘mid-term fiscal plan’ passed by the Athens parliament amid fierce protests in July – to make up for the gaping €2bn budget black hole. “Every time we give them something, they give up,” complained one EU observer following Greece’s fiscal progress. “Nothing has been done to implement the reform programme passed in July, which is why the economy is now in such difficulty.” Measures required to reduce the public deficit to a sustainable level will now almost certainly include mass layoffs in the 700,000-strong public sector, closure of inefficient state-owned entities, cutting pay and pensions and extra taxes on heating and diesel oil. Once reclaimed from the public sector – long exploited for political patronage in a society reared on grace and favours – resources will be released into Greece’s under-developed private sector to help boost lagging levels of competitiveness. “The ball is in the Greek court. Implementation is of the essence,” Bob Traa, the IMF’s permanent representative in Athens, told the conference. Some 50,000 civil servants will likely be placed in a special “labour reserve” with lower pay in the coming weeks with double that number laid off by 2015 if the policies are enforced as creditors want. The spectre of more austerity – after two years of continuous price rises, wage cuts, pension drops and tax increases – has been described by many Greeks as a tipping point that will almost certainly unleash further social unrest. The country’s powerful unions reacted last week to the news of a surprise new property tax – perhaps the most unpopular measure to date – by promising to take to the streets. “The measures will be much harder to pass now than they were two months ago,” political analyst Kostas Panagopoulos said. “The government now has to do what it hasn’t done [yet] in record time and people are not only frustrated, they are increasingly desperate. There will be unrest. We are closer to a social revolution in Greece than ever before.” European debt crisis European banks Greece Europe Stock markets IMF Economics Global economy Helena Smith guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Obama Deficit Plan Lays Down Marker

President Obama has unveiled a plan to cut another $3 trillion from the deficit, but with roughly half that amount coming from higher taxes, mostly on the rich — an approach Republicans are rejecting out of hand. (Sept. 19)

Continue reading …
If He Has A Mistress, Why Can’t She Have…A Mister?

In the 21st century, egalitarianism reigns — or does it? Why, if a husband can have a mistress, can his wife not have a mister? Not just a “piece on the side,” certainly not a gigolo, but a man with whom she shares a long-term, extramarital romantic and sexual relationship — a mister, the male equivalent to husband’s mistress. (Except that, in these modern times, she should not have to support him.) This is by no means a new notion. In 1778, Lady Julia Stanley — the protagonist of Georgiana, Duchess of Devonshire’s novel “The Sylph” — muses that her husband has had a mistress since their wedding day and asks plaintively, “What law excludes a woman from doing the same?” The simple answer was the law of the double standard that tolerated adultery in husbands but condemned it in wives — the law of England, indeed, the law of most lands. In an era of marriages contracted as either commercial or family alliances, when (in Lady Julia’s words) “the heart [was] not consulted,” this law was particularly onerous. Let’s look at how patrician society in England and Italy attempted to assuage the wifely dissatisfaction and unhappiness that marked so many unloving marriages. Julia’s creator, Georgiana, knew the rules. The wife must produce an heir and until then, remain faithful. Afterward, as long as she was discreet, she could become another privileged man’s lover (no mating with the coachman or gardener!) but without conceiving his child. Her husband, who protected and provided for her, could only be clandestinely cuckolded. Georgiana played by these rules. Whenever she seemed likely to stray, her controlling mother reined her in. It didn’t matter that her husband’s new mistress, Bess Foster, was her closest friend. Only after Georgiana had produced an heir could she decently look outside her marriage for the personal fulfillment so egregiously lacking inside it. That happy day came when Georgiana delivered William Hartington “Hart” Spencer, her third child and first son, the longed-for heir who (she rejoiced) freed her from marital bondage. She began a passionate love affair with the much younger politician, Charles Grey. But Grey was not her mister. Rather, she had become his mistress. Then Georgiana broke a cardinal rule — she became pregnant by Grey — and her furious husband forced her to choose. If she did not break off with Grey, she would never again see her children. Georgiana’s capitulation was immediate. Terrified and contrite, she renounced mistressdom and resumed her life as an unloved, cuckolded wife. In Italy, the talented and beautiful Teresa Guiccioli, teenage wife of the very wealthy sixty-year-old Count Alessandro Guiccioli, had a similarly difficult marriage. But before she provided the Count with an heir, Teresa fell profoundly in love with the charismatic and equally smitten expatriate English poet George Gordon, Lord Byron. They had sex almost immediately. Teresa’s maid helped cover their tracks. A priest acted as their go-between. Their affair invoked the unreality of Italian opera — assignations in gliding gondolas and charming, out-of-the-way villas, and long, long hours in bed. Soon, Byron proposed that they run away together. Teresa was shocked. Did Byron not know that in Italy, a wife could have both a husband and a cavalier servente, an eternally faithful, devoted (though chaste) lover? Teresa could have Byron and Guiccioli together — as long as they pretended that she and Byron were not sexual partners. The institution of cavalier servente did not challenge the husband’s dominance in marriage. As in England, a wife was supposed to produce her husband’s heir. Afterward, she was free to cavort with an amico — a “friend” or soulmate who would accompany her to plays, churches and elsewhere. But unlike his English counterpart, the amico was forbidden to have sex with her. The supposedly sex-starved amico also had to swear eternal fidelity to his mistress and promise never to marry or to leave Italy. (Priests were a favorite choice, for their vows of celibacy precluded marriage with anyone.) This arrangement also protected the husband; should he die, his merry widow could never marry her amico. Murder, or suspicious accidents aka “Divorce, Italian Style” could not change the amico’s status. A husband’s demise was no reason — or excuse — for his wife’s platonic relationship to become a sexual one. The wife’s conduct was carefully regulated. She could see her amico in her home but not in his. She could invite him to theatrical productions in her family’s box but not join him in his. She was bound forever to her husband, and she and her amico had to display admiration and affection for him, and never shame or dishonor him or his family’s name or, for that matter, her father’s. So how did cavalier servente work for Teresa? First, Guiccioli “borrowed” a large sum of money from Byron, then invited him to move into their palace where eighteen servants spied on the lovers and made sexual trysts nearly impossible. Guiccioli also noisily exercised his husbandly right to sex with Teresa, making Byron intensely jealous. As the affair deteriorated, Byron complained that a man should not be hobbled to a woman, and that his “existence [as a cavalier servente] is to be condemned.” Weary of the conflict and rancor, and no longer “furiously in love,” Byron left Italy — and Teresa — forever. Teresa grieved. In breaking the rules that forbid a cavalier servente from abandoning his mistress, Byron had broken her heart and humiliated her. Soon after, her unhappy marriage failed. Georgiana and Teresa were exceptional women in unexceptional marriages, and their experiences were typical of those of legions of dissatisfied and unhappy wives who struggled for a modicum of relief from the constraints of their arranged marriages. The English assumed sex would occur but penalized its consequences; the Italians permitted socializing and companionship couched in terms of medieval courtly love, but forbid sex. Both imposed strict standards of decorum that upheld husbandly authority. Both systems were, in other words, based on hypocritical premises and for most women, could only work when practiced in the breach. Our egalitarian society has yet to improve on these 18th century pioneering models by devising a way to respond to today’s realities. More than two centuries later the challenge still resonates: If a husband can have a mistress, why can’t his wife have a mister?

Continue reading …

Stocks took a dive this morning as investors fretted over Greece’s deepening debt crisis. The Dow plunged 246 points, according to the Wall Street Journal , while the S&P and Nasdaq shed 26 and 55 points, respectively. Crude oil sank as well, dropping below $85 a barrel. “The market is at…

Continue reading …

Bravo to the federal court that blocked a Florida law restricting a doctor’s right to ask patients whether they own guns, writes Adam Cohen in Time . The court’s move wasn’t just a free-speech victory: It was a “rare setback” for gun-rights advocates who, these days, “have to look hard for…

Continue reading …

Frances Bay

No Comment
Frances Bay

“Frances Bay From Happy Gilmore”the song.Ray Sipe.Lady GaGa. Frances Bay Dies at Age 92 [Funeral] Frances Bay Dies at Age 92 funeral video xvirgo88x says: ‘Hollywood’s Grandma’ Frances Bay dies: Frances Bay , the veteran Canadian actress dubbed “Hollywood’s Gran… http://t.co/yyGR2Vm6

Continue reading …
Osaka Station Water Clock

Osaka Station City features a dot matrix water clock that shows the time as well as astonishingly complex graphics, all with drops of falling water (see a video of the clock in action and a close up video of the water droplets). via Geeks Are Sexy photos and video by Gorimon Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Laughing Squid Discovery Date : 15/09/2011 16:03 Number of articles : 4

Continue reading …
Libya: Gaddafi son spotted in Bani Walid as heavy fighting continues

Libyan forces takes key parts of Sabha but NTC claims sighting in city where Gaddafi loyalists hold fast Free Libyan forces have taken key parts of the southern desert town of Sabha, a bastion of support for Muammar Gaddafi and other senior regime fugitives, the new rebel government in Tripoli announced on Monday. Confirmation of the capture of Sabha’s citadel and airport marks a significant military advance, though the fate of the rest of the town was unclear. But there was no sign of an end to heavy fighting in Bani Walid, 100 miles south of Tripoli, where Saif al-Islam al-Gaddafi, the deposed leader’s son, was said to have been spotted. Saif al-Islam, wanted along with his father for crimes against humanity, has been rumoured to be in the area before, but this was the first sighting to be claimed by officials of the National Transitional Council, now recognised internationally as Libya’s government. Fighting continued around Bani Walid on Monday amid signs that the rebels remain disorganised and disoriented in the face of a determined enemy that dominates the high ground. The situation is complicated by the fact that the town is home to Libya’s largest tribe, the Warfalla, who were hitherto loyal to Gaddafi. NTC officials have made confident predictions about the eventual outcome of the fighting, promising victory within a few days, but there are worries about civilian casualties. “Our fighters are at the gates of Bani Walid,” said the NTC’s military spokesman, Ahmed Bani, who warned that the “forces of the dictator” were trying to destroy the town before it was captured. “Everyone who has been implicated in crimes in Bani Walid will be punished according to the law,” he said. Rebels in Misrata believe a senior Gaddafi figure – possibly another son, Mutasim – is hiding in the coastal city of Sirte, which is also holding out after five days of heavy fighting in which 44 rebels have died. Many believe that the ferocity of the resistance in both strongholds can be explained only by the presence of a member of the former ruling family. Gaddafi was born in Sirte, home to his Gaddadfa tribe. But reports that communications intercepts had revealed the presence of a key regime figure could not be confirmed. Suleiman Mahmoud, the NTC military chief, toured the Sirte front, where it was confirmed that one of his most charismatic brigade commanders, Ibrahim Halbus, had been paralysed by a bullet on Sunday. Mahmoud told the Guardian he hopes to negotiate the surrender of loyalist forces. With Tripoli under NTC control, Gaddafi’s cause was hopeless. “We succeed,” he said. “We will win this fight for freedom.” Speaking in Tripoli, Bani played down the significance of capturing Gaddafi, insisting: “We are not concerned with him. We are busy liberating the whole of Libya. That is our first priority. If we knew where he was we would have finished with this problem earlier. We consider him as part of the past. And the best proof of that is that we are here in Tripoli.” Libyans believe Gaddafi may be hiding in the desert south of Sabha, protected by Tuareg tribesmen and specially recruited loyalists who have been trained to defend him with their lives. Many say it is vital that he be killed, or caught and brought to justice, not least so that the vast sums of money he is believed to have stolen can be reclaimed by the new government. The volatile security situation remains a preoccupation amid fears that continued fighting will embolden Gaddafi supporters and set back ambitious plans for change. The so-called “countdown” to a new Libya can begin only when the NTC is able to declare the liberation of the entire country, which cannot happen as long as Sirte and Bani Walid hold out. In another important step towards wider international recognition, Libya’s interim prime minister, Mahmoud Jibril, will be at the UN general assembly in New York this week. But he leaves behind the unfinished business of forming a larger interim cabinet to address concerns about the under-representation of Tripoli and pressure from Islamists for a bigger role in government. Libya Muammar Gaddafi Middle East Africa Arab and Middle East unrest Ian Black Chris Stephen guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Lib Dems need to move on from ‘really tough year’, says Nick Clegg

Deputy prime minister admitted failure to communicate core messages but said conscience was clear about the big decisions Nick Clegg issued an impassioned plea to his fellow Liberal Democrats on Monday to stop “beating ourselves up” over the compromises the party had to make in forming a coalition with the Tories. In a pep talk at the Lib Dem conference, the deputy prime minister admitted that he had failed to communicate many of his core messages during a “really tough year”, though he insisted the party had made the right judgment call overall. Clegg, whose comments came during a 45-minute question and answer session, said: “We have had a really, really tough year, a really tough year, the like of which I think many of us could not have predicted. But we have got to stop beating ourselves up about it. A political party that does not move forward always ends up going backwards.” The deputy prime minister said that the party had a clear conscience after forming a coalition in the national interest. “I remember looking in the rear view mirror at all the people ranting, saying, why did you do this? The supporters we lost. But at the end of the day, when you explained to them calmly over and over again why we did what we did and that our conscience is clear on the big judgments – not on individual decisions – we have nothing to apologise for.” The remarks by Clegg, who appeared impatient at times, encapsulated his core message at this year’s conference in Birmingham. First, the Lib Dems had a duty to form a coalition, after the electorate declined to hand any party a majority, and to show this could work by working in a civilised manner with the Tories. Second, Lib Dems now had the space to trumpet their own achievements after showing the coalition is stable. Clegg reeled off a list of policies that would not have been introduced if the Tories had governed alone: • Taking 1 million people on low pay out of paying income tax. • Making every basic rate taxpayer £200 better off because of the increase in the income tax threshold. • Restoring the earnings link for pensioners. The deputy prime minister illustrated the Lib Dem influence in government by announcing a new £350m programme to help educate an extra 1 million girls in Africa and Asia. “That is us bringing our convictions to bear,” he said. Announcing the policy, Clegg said: “The evidence is now overwhelming. If you want to deal with the demographics in the developing world, if you want to deal with levels of economic development, educational performance – start with women, start with girls.” Illustrating how the Lib Dems will now hail their achievements, Clegg said: “You have got to constantly, constantly, constantly tell our side of the story. If we don’t tell our side of the story, I tell you, very many other people won’t.” But he said people had to understand that both parties had to compromise because neither won the election. “It is a coalition. It is built on compromise. People either accept that compromise can work. It is not a dirty word. You’ve got people on the left who hate it, who scream at us ‘treachery’. People from the right, like Nadine Dorries, cannot get over the fact that the Conservatives didn’t win the last election.” He lit up when a delegate highlighted research showing that the Lib Dems had managed to include 75% of their manifesto in the coalition agreement, compared with 60% for the Tories. “I have always been taught by my mum to be modest about your achievements. But the fact that the BBC should choose to publish research showing that 75% of our manifesto is being delivered in the coalition agreement – more than even the Conservatives – exposes the lie that somehow we have sold ourselves short.” But Clegg said the leadership was guilty of a failure of communication over policies such as university tuition fees. He said the coalition’s policy, which will see a trebling of fees, is fairer because the repayment threshold has been lifted from £15,000 to £21,000. “I totally accept the challenge, self-evidently, that have we been really successful in communicating all that? No, clearly not. Do we need to? You bet,” he said. “Are we getting better at doing that? Yes, we are. Have we got a long way to go? Even more so, yes. If you look at what ministers are doing, day in day out, and what we did when we negotiated the coalition agreement, I don’t think any fair-minded person looking in the round can say we did anything other than punch above our weight.” Liberal Democrat conference Liberal Democrats Nick Clegg Liberal-Conservative coalition Nicholas Watt guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …