As high court decides upon legality of Sheikh Raed Salah’s detention, home secretary admits tougher line on extremism The home secretary, Theresa May, has defended her decision to exclude the Palestinian political activist Sheikh Raed Salah from Britain, insisting that she will take pre-emptive action against those who encourage extremism. A high court judge is to decide whether Salah’s arrest and detention was illegal and if he should be entitled to damages for false imprisonment. Salah, 52, is leader of the northern branch of the Islamic movement in Israel, and was detained in London in June after it emerged he had been allowed to enter Britain despite an exclusion order being issued against him. Salah, a Palestinian with Israeli citizenship, is on bail pending the outcome of his legal challenge. The home secretary, speaking at the Council on Foreign Relations in Washington, defended her action and acknowledged the hardening in the coalition government’s approach to those who it believes “encourage extremism”. “I think it is right that we have taken a slightly different stance over the last 18 months, as a new government, in looking at this because we believe that the issue of words that are said – what people actually say and how they are able to encourage others through the words that they say – is an important issue for us to address,” she said. “That’s why we have perhaps taken some decisions in relation to individuals that might not have been taken in the past.” She said it was important for the government’s Prevent strategy to look not only at violent extremism, but other kinds of extremism as well. “If we are able to do that, I think [that] enables us to operate at an earlier level rather than simply waiting until people have gone down the route of violent extremism,” she said. The high court ruling in the Salah case will test the legality of this pre-emptive approach to excluding overseas political activists branded as extremists by the home secretary. Mr Justice Nicol reserved judgment after a two-day hearing on whether Salah’s arrest and detention was legal and he should be entitled to damages. Salah is claiming he was falsely imprisoned because he was “confined without lawful authority”. Salah flew to Britain on 25 June intending to stay for 10 days to attend meetings and public engagements. It is believed he was “waved through at [the] border” and was detained three days later when it emerged the home secretary had issued a deportation order, saying Salah’s presence in Britain was “not conducive to the public good”. Salah’s defence told the high court that the police who arrested him at a London hotel failed to explain in Arabic why they were detaining him. Terrorism policy UK security and terrorism Immigration and asylum Palestinian territories Middle East Israel Human rights Alan Travis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Type: Grocery Title: Community Coffee Whole Bean Coffee, Breakfast Blend, 12-Ounce Bags (Pack of 3) See all customer reviews Product Description: This extraordinarily aromatic and light-roasted blend produces a fragrant, sweet and mellow cup that is sure to satisfy. Contains medium acidity and medium full body. Features: Made with 100% Arabica coffee beans Roasted and packaged in Louisiana Easy Open, Re-Sealable Bag Community Coffee Company has sold the finest, fresh-roasted premium coffee in Louisiana since 1919 Now, you can taste the genuine flavor of New Orleans from anywhere in the world See the details
Continue reading …As Subscribers Flee, Netflix Shares Plunge RIMM – Research in Motion Stock Crash called PERFECTLY by Penny Stocks Master Netflix stock plunges as subscribers quit eternali says: Netflix Has Lost Half Its Value in Two Months http://t.co/J6uPce6i RT @ mashable
Continue reading …BellaCarmen1025 says: @ brookeburke Hi Brooke , I’m a big fun of yours! I got goose bumps when I herd u say Brooke Burke – Charvet !! Congratulations!
Continue reading …On Monday's Morning Edition , National Public Radio channeled the thrill of discovering an ancient Roman writer's “spookily modern” writings. Anchor Steve Inskeep touted a long-forgotten work championing atheism: “Some people wake up in the morning and thank God for granting them another day. Others get up, and thank their genes, their frontal cortex and their lipids. Secular thinking has a long, long history, longer than many of us knew.” That's a strange opening. It's not very historical — no one questioned theism in ancient Greece? But NPR's Robert Krulwich seemed thrilled at the story of “our book” of godlessness being saved for the ages. His guide was leftist literary theorist Steven Greenblatt, but NPR failed to mention the taxpayer-funded network was following the footsteps of The New Yorker. Greenblatt concluded by touting the “deep truth” and joy found in discovering there is no God: KRULWICH: Though his poem is more than 2,000 years old, even today… GREENBLATT: It's dangerous. It's radioactive. It's dangerous to touch it. KRULWICH: It describes a universe with no author and no purpose, but of such exquisite complexity… GREENBLATT: It's unbelievably beautiful. It's written in just magnificent poetry. KRULWICH: That says that even if there is no heaven, no loving god, no design, no reason for us to be here – as painful as that may seem – says Lucretius, look around, what is here is more than good. It's amazing and it's beautiful. GREENBLATT: I think that there is a deep truth to that perception and I think that what Lucretius offers still, after 2,000 years – more than 2,000 years – is an incentive to take this news not as pain but as pleasure, not as disillusionment, but as wonder. Greenblatt presents a “dangerous” book oppressed by the Christian church. KRULWICH: Fifty years before Jesus, many Romans probably had copies of Lucretius in their libraries. Then comes the rise of the Christian Church. When church fathers read this poem, they thought: What, where is our story? GREENBLATT: Where were the angels? Where were the demons? Where was Jesus Christ? That world didn't have room any longer for a vision of atoms and emptiness and nothing else. So Lucretius basically goes underground, disappears. Until a man named Poggio Bracciolini finds it in a monastery in Germany: GREENBLATT: So, there are a group of people, let's say around the year 1400. KRULWICH: And one of them is Poggio Bracciolini who lived near Florence GREENBLATT: He was a poor kid. He came with, he says, five pennies in his pocket to Florence. But he has a peculiar gift, which is that he has fantastically good handwriting. KRULWICH: And that gift got him his jobs with the Pope. GREENBLATT: That's where the money is. KRULWICH: And where there's intrigue and corruption and violence are. At one point, Poggio gets into a fight with another secretary and he tries to gouge out his eye. GREENBLATT: Well, the other guy was holding his testicles at the time. (LAUGHTER) I mean they were having a fight. They all hated each other. KRULWICH: This sounds awful. GREENBLATT: And so it was a good place to lose your soul, as it were. KRULWICH: But on his bad days, and he had a lot of them, Poggio had a way to escape. He would imagine beautiful, elegant, classic works from ancient Rome, filled with noble thoughts, lost books waiting somewhere to be rescued. And he had this desire, says Steve, to find those lost books. Naturally, the enemy isn't happy. KRULWICH: And the book is banned, first in schools and then In Florence. But Machiavelli, in his own hand, makes himself a private copy. And now, Shakespeare notices and then Montaigne in France writes essay after essay about Lucretius. GREENBLATT: Moliere did a translation. KRULWICH: And Thomas Jefferson had five copies of Lucretius in his library. They, all of them, borrowed from Lucretius – this radically secular thinker. Though his poem is more than 2,000 years old, even today… That would take you back to the ending passage about the “magnificent poetry.” Harvard Magazine also retraces Greenblatt's writing on a “repressive” Church and its “murderous reflexes” oppressing Lucretius. Typically, NPR tells this as a happy tale of secularism with no need for a rebuttal from Christian experts.
Continue reading …Celebrity Shill of the Day: Ironically, the only reason I can think of why George Clooney agreed to star in this kinda-creepy ad for Norway’s biggest bank is because he squandered all his money. Tagline: “Some have luck in life. The rest of us might want to save some.” [ copyranter .] Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : The Daily What Discovery Date : 19/09/2011 21:00 Number of articles : 3
Continue reading …Bill Bailey gets straight to the point – the world as we know it is ending. According to something he read on a website. But why are people panic-buying trampolines? Bill Bailey
Continue reading …European court of human rights says removal would breach right to family life in ruling that could curtail Home Office powers The Home Office’s ability to deport individuals who have committed crimes may be curtailed by a European court judgment banning the removal of a Nigerian man convicted of rape. The Strasbourg court ruled that the 24-year-old man, known as AA, would have his right to family life “violated” if he was sent back to Nigeria. He lives with his mother, a nurse, in England. In its finding, the court declared: “The applicant’s deportation from the United Kingdom would be disproportionate to the legitimate aim of the ‘prevention of disorder and crime’ and would therefore not be necessary in a democratic society.” How much of a precedent the case will set was not immediately clear. The man was convicted of rape at the age of 15 but parole reports showed he had responded “positively” to rehabilitation and was subsequently deemed to pose a low risk of reoffending. Welcoming the decision, the Aire Centre, the legal centre which took the case to the European court of human rights, described it as a “resounding victory”. The young man has obtained both undergraduate and postgraduate degrees in the UK since leaving school, it said. A spokeswoman added: “There has been the most spectacular rehabilitation of a juvenile offender. The blanket approach [to deportation] taken by the UK was totally inappropriate.” The Home Office did not comment immediately on the judgment. Last year about 5,000 “foreign national criminals” were deported from the UK at the end of their sentences. In its judgment, the court explained: “The fact that the applicant was a minor when he committed the offence does not preclude his deportation given the seriousness of the offence in question. “[But that] consideration must be carefully weighed against the applicant’s exemplary conduct and, as the evidence before the court demonstrates, commendable efforts to rehabilitate himself and to reintegrate into society over a period of seven years. “In such circumstances, the [UK] government are required to provide further support for their contention that the applicant can reasonably be expected to cause disorder or to engage in criminal activities such as to render his deportation necessary in a democratic society. “However, the government have neither cited other relevant concerns nor submitted any documents capable of supporting such a contention.” European court of human rights Immigration and asylum Human rights Owen Bowcott guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …