Home » Archives by category » News (Page 8977)
Suicide bomber kills 17

Baghdad – A suicide bomber blew up his car Sunday outside government offices west of the Iraqi capital, killing 17 people, including women and elderly people waiting to collect welfare checks, officials said. Six police officers were among the dead in the latest strike on the provincial council compound in the Anbar province capital of Ramadi, police and hospital officials said on condition of anonymity because they were not authorised to brief the media. At least 23 people were wounded in Sunday’s attack on the compound, which has been a favourite target for insurgents…

Continue reading …
Condoleezza Rice Schools Katie Couric on Why U.S. Invaded Iraq

On December 3, former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice gave CBS's Katie Couric a much-needed lesson on why America invaded Iraq. When Couric said to her guest during an “HBO History Makers Series” interview, “Documentaries have been made about how intelligence was incorrectly analyzed and cherry-picked to build an argument for war, and memos from that time do suggest that officials knew there was a small chance of actually finding weapons of mass destruction in Iraq,” Rice stopped the host dead in her tracks (video follows with transcript and commentary): read more

Continue reading …
Phil Donahue on Media Consolidation and Being Taken Off the Air for Opposing Iraq Invasion

Click here to view this media Phil Donahue joined Eliot Spitzer and Kathleen Parker to discuss his long career as a talk show host, the dangers of media consolidation and his ouster from MSNBC during the run up to the invasion of Iraq for daring to speak out opposing it. You generally don’t find too many conversations like this one on cable news since I’m sure their bosses wouldn’t want to shine a light too brightly on the need to bust these companies up. Every once in a while one slips through like this one though. PARKER: If you think Oprah has the longest running syndicated talk show in history, think again. That particular honor belongs to our next guest. SPITZER: Phil Donahue invented the daytime confessional format, aiming both high brow and low in his 29-year long career. We spoke to him earlier. SPITZER: Thank you for joining us. It’s an honor to have you here. PARKER: I’m thrilled. I watched your show for years and years. I think my entire life. DONAHUE: Well, I thank you. You turned out anyway, didn’t you, watching me? PARKER: Do you sometimes think maybe you created a monster? DONAHUE: Well, I have said they are all my illegitimate children and I love them equally. But it is true that the game has changed, really quite something. In many ways it’s changed from when I went often the off the air which was ’96 with my daytime show. And even the cable, nighttime, your arena, since 2002, when I was on MSNBC, it’s totally different now, totally. PARKER: Is it meaner? Is it coarser? DONAHUE: Sure. First of all, I would never mention Bill O’Reilly on my MSNBC program in 2002. This is only eight years ago. Why would you mention the competition? People might — today, this group — SPITZER: They live off each other. DONAHUE: The shows have fallen back on each other and we are now being entertained by watching them fight with each other. PARKER: But guess what, you don’t see women doing that, do you? DONAHUE: I haven’t thought about that. SPITZER: Oh, sure you do. PARKER: Not really? SPITZER: I’m not going to name names. I don’t think there is a gender divide here. Some of the more vitriolic names right now may not be women, but I don’t think there’s a gender division. PARKER: I think some woman are vitriolic in their approach to interviewing and commenting. But I don’t think they go after each other. DONAHUE: You might want to watch “The View.” PARKER: Yeah. DONAHUE: Well that’s true, that is not a night time show. I don’t know if that makes a difference, but certainly they push back. SPITZER: I want to go back to Newt Minnow who way back in the 60s, I think it was, referred to TV as a vast wasteland. Are we doing better? Are the talk shows even though they’re edgy and they’re loud and the decibel level may be too high, do they contribute to our politics in a way or a bad way, do you think? DONAHUE: Well, as you know, I’m a brilliant man. SPITZER: We do know, that’s why I’m asking you this hard question. DONAHUE: Here’s the thing I’m having trouble with. You know, I — in — my first job was in a radio station, and I was the news director. I had never been a reporter. I was the news director, by the way, because I was the only man in the news department. It was a small radio station. And I covered the news, and I could stop the mayor. I was like — I looked 12 years old, and I couldn’t get over the power of this thing. And then I’m a slow learner. The First Amendment ensures that if anybody can be a reporter, even me, I took no test, I didn’t pee in a bottle, I just said I’m a reporter, and I was, that’s what you want, because you get a lot of people reporting then. And then somewhere in the middle of this large crowd will be found the truth. Today, that middle is occupied by five companies. So you don’t get to push back. There is — I have 900 channels on my TV, but 700 of them are selling the Botox machine. That is not good diversity. SPITZER: But right. But here’s where the new media, the technology maybe our saving grace. There has been this diffusion, this explosion in terms of the number of channels and the YouTubes and social media so everybody is a journalist, because everybody can talk to everybody. And you’re right. There is this enormous and dangerous concentration, but out of that voices will emerge, can we not hope, sort of — DONAHUE: You would hope. But let’s remember this, governor — every major metropolitan newspaper in this country supported the invasion of Iraq. SPITZER: Right. DONAHUE: I mean, think about that. This is the land of the first amendment. Cacophony of voices, arguing, growing — SPITZER: Let me raise something then that — DONAHUE: But this is corporate media. This is what you get. SPITZER: I want to raise something then that we weren’t going to raise, which is that you were pushed off the air because you opposed it. DONAHUE: I opposed the war. SPITZER: And is that one of the reasons they pushed you off? DONAHUE: Read the memo published by the “New York Times,” “Donahue’s anti-war voice is not going to work against the flag waving on the other station.” Donahue and any anti-war voice in 2002, remember, they’re all doing what I did now. The whole channel is now. You could not criticize this war four months before the invasion. It was not good for business. You had — General electric had no interest in featuring an old talk show host who was against the president’s war. It was — it was unpopular. You weren’t American. This is what you get with corporate media. It’s going to happen again. PARKER: Well, and, you know, when the Congress voted for it, too. But everyone did think there was something going on. It’s not like they were just maliciously going after another country. People were afraid, don’t you think? After 9/11 — DONAHUE: Are we so insecure? PARKER: Yes. DONAHUE: That when — PARKER: After we were attacked the way we were attacked, I think there was a low, low tolerance for any kind of risk. I’m not making a justification for war. I’m just saying what — DONAHUE: Are you making a justification for this war? PARKER: The mindset of the country at the time was such that — I mean, I wish you had been on the air doing your old show. DONAHUE: I do, too. But I didn’t make it to the invasion. I was gone three months — the invasion was March of ’03 and I was gone like in January. And the president — the president scared the hell out of the nation. PARKER: The nation was already scared. DONAHUE: He’s under your bed, he’s outside your window, he’s got mass destruction weapons. You could feel the heartbeat of the nation accelerate. It was a bloodlust — SPITZER: You are so right in what you’re saying is so important about the lack of tolerance for dissenting voices and your voice not going to be silenced. DONAHUE: Oh, thank you. SPITZER: It won’t be. I don’t care who does what. It won’t be silenced. PARKER: Phil Donahue, thank you for being with us. DONAHUE: Thank you both. PARKER: We’ll be back.

Continue reading …
Raw Video: Oprah Climbs Sydney Bridge

Oprah Winfrey and 302 audience members, who won a trip to Australia with the talk show host, climbed the Sydney Harbor Bridge. It took them several hours to climb the 440 foot-high bridge. (Dec. 12)

Continue reading …
Amateur Video Shows Twin Swedish Blasts

Two blasts that shook a busy shopping street in central Stockholm were an act of terrorism, officials said Sunday, in what appeared to be a suicide bombing. It would be the first such attack in the Nordic country. (Dec. 12)

Continue reading …
VP of R&D Admits Electric Engine Helps Porsche Game Environmental Laws

Image: Porsche 918 Spyder Press Release When Porsche presented the 918 Spyder plug-in electric concept car, it got some leaded blood boiling. A sportscar that can do 0-60 mph in 3.2 seconds but gets under 78 miles per gallon (3L/100km)? Brian Merchant deemed it a significant development, one which “will make waves far beyond the crowd concerned with fuel efficiency.” And that is what we want, right? To pull everyone into the green li… Read the full story on TreeHugger

Continue reading …

A New York Times “Learning Network” graphic informs us that under the proposed Obama-GOP tax and spending compromise, “rates will not change for at least two years for anyone.” Wow. Somebody at the Learning Network needs to tell the Old Gray Lady's beat reporters, editorial board, and opinion columnists. Just today, reporter Helene Cooper, in noting

Continue reading …

So corporations sense vulnerability and they’re going to ask for the moon — basically, they want to run untaxed, unregulated businesses with few (if any) legal obligations to the people who still work for them. Oh, and they want “austerity” for the working classes. (Don’t worry, Obama will fight hard to protect us!) There, that’s settled! Now perhaps the president can convene a one-day summit of the unemployed and the working poor to ask them what they think, for a change: WASHINGTON—President Barack Obama will convene a one-day summit of corporate chief executives Wednesday as part of a renewed White House effort to build support among business leaders for his economic agenda. Executives from Google, Cisco Systems, Inc., Facebook Inc., International Business Machines Corp., American Express Co., The Dow Chemical Co. and Pepsico Inc. have been invited to the Wednesday meeting at Blair House, adjacent to the White House, to discuss trade, tax, regulatory issues and the deficit. The administration wants to persuade U.S. companies to unleash some of the $1.93 trillion in cash and other liquid assets they’re hoarding in their treasuries. Cash as a share of total assets is at the highest level it’s been in a half-century, the Federal Reserve said last week. Mr. Obama wants the nation’s biggest companies to invest that money in expansion and new hires in the U.S. Ideas for overhauling the tax code and cutting the deficit will be a substantial part of the Wednesday discussion, Presidential adviser Valerie Jarrett said, as would ideas for “a balanced approach to regulations—to promote economic growth and give business regulatory certainty and predictability while providing safety for the American people,” she said. Last summer, former White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel pushed for a review of rules affecting business hiring, but ran into stiff resistance from some members of the president’s political team. “Regulations have been a fault-line with business, so compromise on them would be a very welcome change,” said Johanna Schneider, executive director of the Business Roundtable, composed of chief executives from the nation’s biggest multinationals. Mr. Obama has met with chief executives since the start of his administration, but some who attended those meetings have complained that he didn’t take their views into account in policies that resulted. Corporate leaders have expressed dismay at Mr. Obama’s sometimes sharp criticism of multi-national corporations, and his administration’s regulatory and tax policies, such as a proposal to raise taxes on income corporations earn overseas. Business executives say they sense a difference in the approach taken by Mr. Obama since Democrats got trounced in the November congressional elections. Recent administration compromises on trade and taxes have encouraged business leaders.

Continue reading …
World’s smallest battery uses a single nanowire, plant-eating virus could improve Li-ion cells tenfold

When it comes to building better batteries, building electrodes with greater surface area is key, and scientists are looking to exotic methods to attract the tiny particles they need. We’ve already seen graphene and carbon nanotubes soak up those electrons, but the University of Maryland has another idea — they’re using the Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) to generate usable patterns of nanorods on the surface of existing metal electrodes. By modifying the germ and letting it do its thing, then coating the surface with a conductive film, they’re generating ten times the energy capacity of a standard lithium-ion battery while simultaneously rendering the nasty bug inert. Meanwhile, the Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies (CINT) at Sandia Labs was more curious how these tiny charges actually work without confusing the forest for the trees, so to speak, so a team of scientists set about constructing the world’s smallest battery. Using a single tin dioxide nanowire as anode, a chunk of lithium cobalt dioxide as cathode, and piping some liquid electrolyte in between, they took a microscopic video of the charging process. See it in all its grey, goopy glory right after the break. Continue reading World’s smallest battery uses a single nanowire, plant-eating virus could improve Li-ion cells tenfold World’s smallest battery uses a single nanowire, plant-eating virus could improve Li-ion cells tenfold originally appeared on Engadget on Sun, 12 Dec 2010 10:19:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink

Continue reading …
Brazilian Trees Implanted with Microchips For Forest Management

Photo: Taunting Panda According to a story on Reuters , trees throughout the Amazon rainforest will be equipped with microchips to gather data in the event they are illegally cut down. Now when a tree falls in the forest and there’s no one there to hear it, we’ll still know its story…. Read the full story on TreeHugger

Continue reading …