Joe Scarborough joins the chorus of those wishing for a more civil tone in politics, but he’s not holding out much hope that the moral argument for civility will do the trick. After all, Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck, and other “right-wing polemicists who make big bucks spewing rage” aren’t admitting…
Continue reading …

On Tuesday's CBS Early Show, congressional correspondent Nancy Cordes reported on Sarah Palin's first interview since the Tucson shooting: “She accused the Left and the news media of trying to destroy her message, trying to destroy her, said she was being accused of being an accessory to murder.” Cordes forgot to mention her role in furthering those accusations against the former Alaska governor. After playing a clip of Palin's Monday interview on Fox News' Hannity, Cordes mentioned: “The early response I'm hearing from some on the Left about this interview is, 'Look we never said she was an accessory to murder, we simply said she was an accessory to in-civility in politics.'” On the day of the shooting, reporting for the CBS Evening News, Cordes implied Palin played a role in inciting the violence: “Giffords was one of 20 Democrats whose districts were lit up in cross hairs on a Sarah Palin campaign Web site last spring. Giffords and many others complained that someone unstable might act on that imagery.” Introducing the segment with Cordes, co-host Chris Wragge declared: “This morning Sarah Palin isn't backing down from some controversial statements she made in the wake of the Tucson shootings.” Apparently, only Palin's defense of herself was “controversial,” not the media coverage that initially accused her of causing the tragedy. During a news brief in the 8AM ET hour, news reader Jeff Glor remarked that: “After the Tucson shooting, Sarah Palin was criticized by some.” Like Cordes, he forgot to mention that CBS News was one of those critics. He then noted how Palin “said her political action committee's use of cross hairs to identify swing districts, including Gabrielle Giffords, has been used before, she says, by Democrats….that Democrats have used cross hairs to target Republican districts on maps.” Despite the numerous times CBS reports in the wake of shooting displayed Palin's campaign map of targeted Democratic districts, Glor was unable to produce an image of the Democratic Leadership Council's 2004 map placing bull's eyes over Republican districts. Despite CBS's role in promoting uncivil and unproven charges against Palin, following his discussion with Cordes, Wragge suggested they were the arbiters of civil discourse: “It's going to be very interesting to see over the next couple of days just how civilized the tone in this new Washington is now.” Fellow co-host Erica Hill went further: “Yes, on both sides, how everyone can continue that pledge. We will be watching with a trained eye, that's for sure, as will Nancy and our folks in Washington.” Turning to the 7AM ET hour news headlines, Glor remarked: “Always civilized here, right guys?” Hill replied: “Always.” Here is a full transcript of Cordes's January 18 discussion with Wragge: 7:00AM ET TEASE: CHRIS WRAGGE: Not backing down. As Congress heads back to work with a vow to be more civil, Sarah Palin defends herself in her first television interview since the Tucson shootings. SARAH PALIN: I know that a lot of those on the Left hate my message and they'll do all that they can to stop me because they don't like the message. 7:07AM ET SEGMENT: CHRIS WRAGGE: This morning Sarah Palin isn't backing down from some controversial statements she made in the wake of the Tucson shootings. Meanwhile, the Republican-led House of Representatives gets back to work today, promising to be more polite but no less aggressive in trying to push their agenda. CBS News congressional correspondent Nancy Cordes is in Washington this morning for us. Nancy, good morning to you. NANCY CORDES: Good morning, Chris. [ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: Back to Work; GOP to Fight Healthcare In House] WRAGGE: Well, let me ask you, how are things going to be different on Capitol Hill now with this debate, these contentious debates, that take place in the wake of the tragedy in Tucson? CORDES: Well, I think you will see some changes, at least at first, Chris. The rhetoric has already been a little softer, a little more measured. There's this movement, as you've heard, to have Republicans and Democrats sit among each other at the President's State of the Union address instead of having one party on the left and the other party on the right. You've even heard Republicans praising the President's speech in Tucson, saying that he struck the right note there. So I think both sides are trying to be a little less caustic, we'll just have to see if it sticks. WRAGGE: The first order of real business, repealing health care. How tame a debate can people expect with two sides that are just so bitterly divided? CORDES: Yes, so this will really be a test of their new resolve, because there's almost no issue that divides them like health care. And the press releases are already flying in advance of this debate. The Democrats have even launched new ads attacking Republicans for trying to repeal the bill. So I expect that this debate will be a heated one. It just might not be as venomous as it would have been otherwise. WRAGGE: Let's talk about Sarah Palin here for a moment, she gave her first TV interview since the Tucson shootings to Fox News last night. What did she have to say? [ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: Not Backing Down; Palin Defends Tucson Comments In First Interview] CORDES: Well, she accused the Left and the news media of trying to destroy her message, trying to destroy her, said she was being accused of being an accessory to murder. She defended her use of those cross hairs, she defended her use of the term 'blood libel.' This was a 30 minute ranging interview. Let's listen to some of what she had to say. SARAH PALIN: That came up right away, that, 'Oh, it must be a cause of this horrendous evil act of this shooter that perhaps he saw that map and that incited him towards violence,' which of course is ridiculous and, again, it's not an original use of an icon or a graphic. I will continue to speak out. They're not going to shut me up, they're not going to shut you up or Rush or Mark Levin, or Tea Party patriots or those who, as I say, respectfully and patriotically petition their government for change. CORDES: The early response I'm hearing from some on the Left about this interview is, 'Look we never said she was an accessory to murder, we simply said she was an accessory to in-civility in politics.' Chris. WRAGGE: Well, we will hear a whole lot more about that all day today, I'm sure. Nancy Cordes in Washington for us this morning. Nancy, thank you very much. CORDES: Sure thing. WRAGGE: It's going to be very interesting to see over the next couple of days just how civilized the tone in this new Washington is now. ERICA HILL: Yes, on both sides, how everyone can continue that pledge. We will be watching with a trained eye, that's for sure, as will Nancy and our folks in Washington. WRAGGE: Want to get you a closer look this morning at some of the other headlines that we're following on this Tuesday. Jeff Glor standing by at the news desk. Jeff, good morning. JEFF GLOR: Always civilized here, right guys? HILL: Always.
Continue reading …

The White House is dismissing a vote by House Republicans to repeal the new health care law, saying it’s not “a serious legislative effort.” (Jan. 18)
Continue reading …
It was a banner year for piracy in 2010, with marauders taking 1,181 hostages, according to the AP . That’s the most prisoners pirates have taken in any year since 1991, when record-keeping began, according to the International Maritime Bureau. But they accomplished the feat while taking only 53 vessels,…
Continue reading …

No huge surprise here, but the FCC just approved Comcast’s purchase of NBC Universal by a 4-1 vote. Details of the ruling aren’t out yet, but FCC chairman Julius Genachowski had been pushing for strong regulations forbidding Comcast from cutting itself sweetheart deals on NBC content or prioritizing its own video traffic on its pipes, so we’d assume that’s part of the agreement here. The only nay vote was from Commissioner Michael Copps, who said the deal “opens the door to the cable-ization of the open Internet.” Ouch. We’ll let you know when we find out exactly what the FCC’s actual conditions are — and keep in mind this deal won’t be wrapped until the Justice Department weighs in, which is expected to happen next week. Can we say it? Oh, we’re going to say it: stay tuned! Update : That was fast, as Comcast/NBCU announced it’s received permission from the Justice Department as wall. Check out the triumphant press release after the break or scour the official site for more details on what conditions may have applied. There will also be a conference call at 4 p.m. so let us know what else you may be interested in finding out before then. So far details include a promise of a “focused mechanism for online video providers to obtain access to certain NBC Universal content,” and that the newly formed entity will retain its economic stake in Hulu, while giving up its voting and board representation rights. Continue reading FCC approves Comcast’s purchase of NBC (Update: Justice Department too, it’s done) FCC approves Comcast’s purchase of NBC (Update: Justice Department too, it’s done) originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 18 Jan 2011 14:22:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …

Haitian police took ex-dictator Jean-Claude Duvalier out of his hotel Tuesday without saying whether he was being detained for crimes committed under his brutal regime. (Jan. 18)
Continue reading …

Canada’s National Post has a great infographics department , and comes up with this clever comparison of an average human stomach to Starbuck’s new 916 millilitre Trenta Cup, that is creeping up on the Big Slurpee. (1.18 litre). … Read the full story on TreeHugger
Continue reading …
The economic crisis can be blamed for the death of quite a few large companies already—think Circuit City, Northwest Airlines, and Countrywide—so which ones can we expect to go bye-bye this year? Here are 10 American companies that seem unlikely to survive, from 24/7 Wall St. via Daily…
Continue reading …

Two arrests have been made connected to the security breach that exposed thousands of iPad users’ email addresses and other info last year. Daniel Spitler and Andrew Auernheimer (yeah, that guy again) have been taken into custody and charged with conspiracy to access a computer without authorization and fraud, for allegedly using a custom script (built by Spitler) called iPad 3G Account Slurper to access AT&T’s servers, mimic an iPad 3G, and try out random ICC identifiers. Once a valid ICC was found, one could harvest the user’s name and email address. Of course, the hackers maintain that this was all done to force AT&T to close a major security flaw , and we’ll be interested to see what exactly the company does to make things right. Two arrested for iPad security breach originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 18 Jan 2011 14:07:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …
Do we still have to pretend that this isn’t one in a series of egregious and illegal acts by JP Morgan Chase in the mortgage foreclosure process — or are we still pretending none of these things are connected ? Just asking! One of the nation’s biggest banks — JP Morgan Chase — admits it has overcharged several thousand military families for their mortgages, including families of troops fighting in Afghanistan. The bank also tells NBC News that it improperly foreclosed on more than a dozen military families. The admissions are an outgrowth of a lawsuit filed by Marine Capt. Jonathan Rowles. Rowles is the backseat pilot of an F/A 18 Delta fighter jet and has served the nation as a Marine for five years. He and his wife, Julia, say they’ve been battling Chase almost that long. The dispute apparently caused the bank to review its handling of all mortgages involving active-duty military personnel. Under a law known as the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA), active-duty troops generally get their mortgage interest rates lowered to 6 percent and are protected from foreclosure. Chase now appears to have repeatedly violated that law, which is designed to protect troops and their families from financial stress while they’re in harm’s way. A Chase official told NBC News that some 4,000 troops may have been overcharged . What’s more, the bank discovered it improperly foreclosed on the homes of 14 military families. “We are deeply appreciative of those who fight to protect our country and Chase funds a number of programs that provide benefits to military personnel and veterans, and while any customer mistake is regrettable, we feel particularly badly about the mistakes we made here, ” Chase chief communications officer Kristin Lemkau said in a statement to NBC News. She said that beginning this week Chase will be mailing a total of about $2 million in refunds to families that may have been overcharged. She says most of the families improperly foreclosed on have gotten or will get their homes back. A bank official described what happened here as “grim,” but emphasized the mistakes were inadvertent, not malicious. Really? Are we talking about the same JP Morgan Chase, the one that illegally foreclosed on Florida homes , screwed the Denver school system , rigged municipal investment contracts , is being investigated by the SEC for rigging some CDOs , is alleged by a whistleblower to have fabricated and/or destroyed credit card records of customers, and bestowed us with President Obama’s new chief of staff? “Inadvertent,” my foot.
Continue reading …