Type: Book Title: The Shakespeare Manuscript: The Original Hamlet Discovered See all customer reviews Product Description: Not one of Shakespeare’s plays exists in manuscript form until a failing bookseller discovers a long-lost, early version of HAMLET. In an attempt to trace the puzzling manuscript’s origins, its new owner finds he can’t trust the identity of play’s author and soon has doubts about his own. But by then, the race to stage the new HAMLET is on, taking a toll on everyone involved. In the end, the new play leaves audience and actors alike wondering about the unexpected and moving consequences of the play they’ve just experienced. See the details
Continue reading …Atlas makers have decided to omit the Maldives from future editions because global warming threatens to submerge the island nation, a climate-change skeptic Telegraph writer claimed in a satirical column . Sound ludicrous? Not to some newspapers and opposition politicians in the Maldives, who took the bogus story seriously and demanded…
Continue reading …Two further judicial reviews lodged with courts as high court judge delays decision The residents of Dale Farm won a further temporary legal victory on Friday when a high court judge ruled that he would not make a decision on the fate of the site until after the weekend. A final decision on whether bailiffs can move in and mount one of the largest evictions in British history could be delayed by weeks after it emerged that two further judicial reviews over the contested site in Essex had been lodged with the courts. Dale Farm residents gained an emergency injunction on Monday to prevent bailiffs entering the site, which is home to 86 families. The injunction was granted because of fears that Basildon council’s eviction “may go further” than allowed. If the two judicial reviews go ahead, they could add thousands to the already substantial legal bills generated by the Dale Farm battle, with the eviction itself estimated to cost up to £18m before the most recent delay. At the high court, Marc Willers, on behalf of Dale Farm, argued that the injunction should be extended because moves to clear the site were legally flawed. Mr Justice Edwards-Stuart told the court the “ultimate eviction” was “in many cases going to happen”. There could be no dispute about the eviction notices themselves, he added, warning: “Anybody who thinks this is a long stay of execution while minor squabbles are carried out – they must think again.” However, he said that did “not mean that they [Dale farm residents] are not entitled to be treated with dignity and that any eviction must be carried out in a sensitive way”. He added: “The ultimate eviction which is, in many cases, going to happen must be carried out, in so far as possible, with people knowing exactly what is going on, what is going to happen and in a way which causes minimum alarm to children and others. It can’t be used as yet another springboard for delay.” Dale Farm Roma, Gypsies and Travellers Alexandra Topping guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Zainab al-Hosni’s mutilated remains were found by her family in a morgue, according to Amnesty International An 18-year-old Syrian woman, whose mutilated body was discovered in a morgue, is believed to be the first female to die in custody during the country’s six-month-old uprising, Amnesty International has said. The family of Zainab al-Hosni found her corpse by chance as they searched for her activist brother’s body in the city of Homs, the human rights group said. The family said she had been decapitated, her arms cut off, and skin removed. “If it is confirmed that Zainab was in custody when she died, this would be one of the most disturbing cases of a death in detention we have seen so far,” said Philip Luther, Amnesty’s deputy director for the Middle East and North Africa. Amnesty said Ms Hosni was abducted by plainclothes individuals believed to be members of the security forces on 27 July, apparently to pressure her activist brother Mohammad Deeb al-Hosni to turn himself in. The deaths of Ms Hosni and her brother bring to 103 the number of people who have been reported killed in Syrian custody since the uprising began in March, Amnesty said. Overall, the UN estimates 2,600 people have been killed since the revolt began in March, and there is no sign of either side giving up. The protest movement has proved remarkably resilient, although the opposition has no clear leadership that could offer an alternative to President Bashar al-Assad, whose family has ruled Syria for more than 40 years. On Friday, Syrian security forces opened fire on thousands of protesters calling for the opposition to unite against Assad’s regime. Friday protests have become a weekly ritual in Syria, despite the near-certainty that security forces will respond with bullets and tear gas. The protests came as the European Union agreed on an investment ban in the Syrian oil sector to put more pressure on Assad to end his deadly crackdown. An activist group, known as the Local Coordinating Committees, said security forces killed one person outside the al-Maari mosque in Damascus. The London-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said security forces killed another man near Homs. An activist in Homs, Majd Amer, said there was unprecedented security presence in the city. “They have been deploying here since last night,” said Amer as cracks of gunfire could be heard in the background. The Syrian government has banned foreign journalists and placed heavy restrictions on local coverage, making it difficult to independently verify reports. Syria Middle East Bashar Al-Assad Arab and Middle East unrest guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Almost 20,000 questions were submitted for Thursday night’s Republican presidential debate, but Fox News picked the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), a designated hate group, to ask the first question on immigration. “Struggling U.S. workers continue to compete with millions of illegal aliens,” FAIR’s Kristen Williamson claimed in her video question. “Do you support legislation to require all employers to use e-verify in order to ensure that the people that they hire are actually legally authorized to work in the U.S.?” Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich replied by saying that the country would be better off if the e-verify program was outsourced to private credit card companies. Although FAIR has testified to Congress more than 30 times, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) considers them to be a hate group . “The identification of FAIR as a bona fide hate group is important,” SPLC’s Mark Potok wrote in 2007. “FAIR is the hub of the American nativist movement, the group that more than any other has contributed to the rancid turn the national immigration discussion has taken. With FAIR fanning the flames of xenophobic intolerance, hate groups, hate crimes and hate speech directed at foreigners and Latinos continue to rise in America.”
Continue reading …As NewsBusters reported Friday, a new Gallup poll found 60 percent of Americans believe the media are biased. Another study released Thursday by the Pew Research Center presented even a greater indictment of news organizations finding that 42 percent of those surveyed think “the press is immoral” and “hurt democracy”: The widely-shared belief that news stories are inaccurate cuts to the press’s core mission: Just 25% say that in general news organizations get the facts straight while 66% say stories are often inaccurate. As recently as four years ago, 39% said news organizations mostly get the facts straight and 53% said stories are often inaccurate. What happened to so change the public's view of the press in just four years? Might it have been the absolutely dreadful job they did vetting presidential candidate Barack Obama as well as the unprecedentedly biased coverage of him since the moment he tossed his hat into the ring back in February 2007? Whatever the answer, distrust for news organizations continues to grow. Another interesting facet of this study was what people think when asked to name a news organization: When asked what first comes to mind when they think of news organizations, 63% volunteer the name of a cable news outlet, with CNN and Fox News by far the most prevalent in people’s minds. Only about a third (36%) name one of the broadcast networks. Fewer than one-in-five mention local news outlets and only 5% mention a national newspaper such as the New York Times, Wall Street Journal or USA Today. When asked to name a news organization 43 percent said CNN, 39 percent said Fox, and everybody else was an also-ran: Also fascinating: Since Barack Obama took office, the proportion of Democrats saying that news stories are often inaccurate has risen sharply, and they are now nearly as critical as Republicans. In 2007, 43% of Democrats and 56% of independents said stories were often inaccurate. Since then, the percentage of Democrats expressing skepticism about the accuracy of news reports has increased by 21 points to 64%, and the percentage of independents saying this has grown by 10 points. Republican views have held fairly steady: 69% see stories as often inaccurate, little changed from four years ago (63%). Why would the views of Democrats and independents have become more jaded since Obama took office? Is it because even these folks know the sycophantic, adoring coverage of him has been disgraceful? By two-to-one (62% to 31%), more Americans say that news organizations are politically biased than say they are careful to avoid biased reporting. These views have changed only modestly in recent years. During the mid-1980s, far fewer said news organizations were politically biased; in Pew Research’s first news attitudes survey, 45% said news organizations were politically biased while 36% said they were careful that their reporting was not politically biased. Yet the most glaring findings: The public is about evenly divided over whether news organizations are immoral (42%) or moral (38%), but the proportion saying the press is immoral also equals an all-time high. For the first time in a Pew Research Center survey, as many say that news organizations hurt democracy (42%) as protect democracy (42%). In the mid-1980s, about twice as many said that news organizations protect democracy rather than hurt democracy. The public also is divided over whether news organizations stand up for America (41%) or are too critical of America (39%). These opinions have changed little in recent years, but in 2002 and 2003 somewhat more said that news organizations stand up for America. Wow. So 42 percent believe the press is immoral and hurting democracy. The media should be so proud of themselves.
Continue reading …Two French women have received the country’s first fines for wearing a full-face veil—and they hope the fines will be the first nail in the coffin of the ban. The Muslim women, who were fined more than $100 each after wearing the veils while trying to deliver a birthday…
Continue reading …