Home » Archives by category » News (Page 817)
Paul McCartney’s ‘Kingdom’ Opens

Sarah Jessica Parker, Naomi Watts, Liv Tyler, and Stella McCartney were among the stars attending the premiere of Sir Paul McCartney’s ballet ‘Ocean’s Kingdom’ in New York. (Sept. 23)

Continue reading …
LG Esteem leaked, delivers more LTE respect to MetroPCS

The LG Esteem has been spotted hanging out in several official-looking press shots accompanied by several pages of specification juice at LG’s partner portal site. Previously seen under the guise Bryce , and seemingly identical to Verizon’s LG Revolution , this metroPCS interpretation looks set to arrive very soon. A welcome upgrade to the network’s previous LTE offering , the Esteem runs Gingerbread on a 4.3 inch screen and has some respectable mid-range crendentials under the hood including a 1GHz Snapdragon processor, 512MB of RAM and 8GB of storage expandable by microSD. There’s also a five megapixel snapper on the back, embedded in a stylish metal strip similar to the dual-core T-Mobile G2x . Unlike LG’s powerful flagship, though, MetroPCS will reportedly be offering up the Esteem off-contract for $349 — a reasonable way to increase your LTE-connected self-worth LG Esteem leaked, delivers more LTE respect to MetroPCS originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 23 Sep 2011 12:43:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink

Continue reading …
LG Esteem leaked, delivers more LTE respect to MetroPCS

The LG Esteem has been spotted hanging out in several official-looking press shots accompanied by several pages of specification juice at LG’s partner portal site. Previously seen under the guise Bryce , and seemingly identical to Verizon’s LG Revolution , this metroPCS interpretation looks set to arrive very soon. A welcome upgrade to the network’s previous LTE offering , the Esteem runs Gingerbread on a 4.3 inch screen and has some respectable mid-range crendentials under the hood including a 1GHz Snapdragon processor, 512MB of RAM and 8GB of storage expandable by microSD. There’s also a five megapixel snapper on the back, embedded in a stylish metal strip similar to the dual-core T-Mobile G2x . Unlike LG’s powerful flagship, though, MetroPCS will reportedly be offering up the Esteem off-contract for $349 — a reasonable way to increase your LTE-connected self-worth LG Esteem leaked, delivers more LTE respect to MetroPCS originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 23 Sep 2011 12:43:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink

Continue reading …

After the third Republican debate in three weeks, one thing is becoming clear: Mitt Romney is pretty good at debating. Most pundits see Romney as the winner of last night’s Fox News/Google debate , and believe fellow front-runner Rick Perry’s performance should worry his campaign. The Texas governor “seemed ill-prepared, couldn’t…

Continue reading …
Audience boos gay soldier at GOP debate, Santorum promises to reinstate don’t ask, don’t tell

Michael Leddy says: I tuned into the Republican presidential candidates’ debate last night just in time to hear audience members boo Stephen Hill, a gay soldier serving in Iraq, who asked whether the candidates intend “to circumvent the progress that’s … Continue reading → Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Boing Boing Discovery Date : 23/09/2011 05:27 Number of articles : 5

Continue reading …
George Osborne: Eurozone has six weeks to resolve financial crisis

Osborne said that eurozone must implement measures agreed in July to support troubled members of the single currency George Osborne warned on Friday that the leaders of the eurozone had six weeks to end their political wrangling and resolve the continent’s crippling debt crisis. Speaking in Washington, the chancellor said that the turmoil in the world’s financial markets meant there was now “a far greater sense of urgency” and mounting pressure on Europe from the G20 group of developed and developing nations. “There is a sense from across the leading lights of the eurozone that time is running out for them. There is a clear deadline at the Cannes summit [G20] in six weeks time”, Osborne said. “The eurozone has six weeks to resolve this political crisis.” With global financial markets again in jittery mood, the chancellor said “bad politics” were leading to “bad economics” in the eurozone. “We need political solutions that can help resolve the economic problems.” He added that the eurozone needed to implement the package of measures agreed in July to provide financial support for troubled members of the single currency, as well as ensure banks had enough capital to withstand market pressures. “I wouldn’t say all the pieces of the jigsaw are in place”, Osborne said, adding that the members of the eurozone had to supplement monetary union with closer fiscal ties. While the government had no intention of joining monetary union, the chancellor said it was in Britain’s interests that the eurozone worked. “The break-up of Europe would be bad for Britain”. The chancellor said Europe needed to show that it had enough firepower to convince the markets it was getting ahead of the curve, and made it clear that the €400bn (£350bn) European Financial Stability Facility needs to be beefed up. “I am not sure it is adequate”, Osborne said. The chancellor refused to speculate on whether Greece would be forced to default on its debts, but said the government had contingency plans in the event that the worst-affected eurozone country did capitulate. “I have made it a priority for the Financial Services Authority and the Bank of England to make sure that the UK banking system is adequately capitalised and have sufficient liquidity to deal with all eventualities. We have stress-tested sovereign write downs.” Osborne admitted that the darkening international economic outlook would have repercussions for the UK but insisted that he had no intention of amending his tough deficit reduction plans. It was up to the Bank of England, he added, to support demand over the coming months. “A credible fiscal plan allows you to have a looser monetary policy than would otherwise be the case. My approach is to be fiscally conservative but monetarily active.” His comments come amid signs from Threadneedle Street that it will re-start its quantitative easing programme over the coming months. The Bank pumped £200bn of electronically-created money into the economy between early 2009 and early 2010 in an attempt to lift the economy out of recession. Asked how bad the situation in the UK would have to get before he would consider changing course, Osborne said: “The UK is taking appropriate action. It is very clear what has got to happen. We are sticking to the plan. “These discussions in Washington are about the eurozone and the challenges there not about market pressures on the UK. We have got ahead of the curve and have credibility.” The chancellor said the heavily-indebted state of Britain meant he could not simply “pull a lever” to boost demand. “This was a different sort of recession and it is a different sort of recovery”, he said. The chancellor said there was a certain amount of flexibility built into his budget plans because weaker growth would allow the automatic stabilisers – a bigger budget deficit caused by higher benefit payments and lower tax receipts – to kick in. The government would announce supply side reforms of the economy to remove obstacles to growth over the coming months. European debt crisis European banks George Osborne IMF Economics Global economy Greece Europe Bank of England Banking Financial crisis Global recession Larry Elliott guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Palestinian UN bid for statehood: live coverage

Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas and Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu address the UN general assembly – live • Read a summary of Palestine’s bid for UN statehood 12.49pm: Abbas makes his plea for Palestine to be recognised as a full member of the UN. “This is a copy of the application,” he says, interrupted by long applause. “I call upon the Secretary-General to transmit our proposal to the Security Council.” “Your support for the recognition of the state of Palestine is the greatest contribution to the state of peace in the region,” Abbas tells the leaders in the general assembly. “I hope we shall not have to wait for long.” That’s it, Abbas finishes after 35 minutes. Israel’s delegation declined to join in the standing ovation and applause for Abbas as he steps down from the podium. 12.47pm: “We have one goal: to be. And we shall be,” says Abbas, winning a loud round of applause. 12.43pm: “Enough, enough, enough,” says Abbas. “It is time for the Palestinian people to gain their freedom and their independence”: The time has come for the Palestinian spring, the time for independence. The time has come for our men, women and children to have normal lives. For them to be able to sleep without fear of what the next day will bring. 12.39pm: Finally, Abbas gets around to mentioning the Palestinian bid for statehood recognition. Ladies and gentlemen, this is the moment of truth … we are the last people in the world to be occupied. Will the world allows this to continue by the state of Israel? 12.35pm: The Guardian’s diplomatic editor, Julian Borger, is disappointed by Abbas’s effort : “So far, this is a fairly routine speech by Abbas. Little by way of soaring rhetoric.” Calling the speech “ill-chosen,” Foreign Policy editor Blake Hounshell says : “This is not a speech that will give Israeli doves much to go on.” 12.33pm: “Our efforts are not aimed at isolating Israel or delegitimising it, “says Abbas. “I am here to say, on behalf of the Palestinian people … we extend our hands to the Israeli government and the Israeli people.” He continues: “Let us build the bridges of dialogue instead of checkpoints.” 12.29pm: Abbas is now listing the conditions for continued negotations, including a call for Israel to cease all settlement building as a pre-condition. 12.22pm: “These are but a few examples of the policy of the Israeli colonial occupation,” says Abbas, who says the sttlements will “destroy the chances of a two state solution”: This settlement policy threatens to also undermine the structure of the Palestine national authority and its very existence. 12.18pm: Abbas now goes into greater detail about Israel’s settlement building, particularly in the Arab parts of Jerusalem and the West Bank, and describes it (or his translator does) as an attempt to establish “a fait accompli “. Only CNN of the US news networks has stayed with live coverage of Abbas’s speech this far, although Fox News and MSNBC are giving analysis rather than carrying the live feed from the UN. 12.15pm: Abbas says that a year ago there were high hopes for a peace agreement. “We entered those negotiations with open hearts and attentive ears,” Abbas said. “But these negotiations broke down just weeks after they were launched.” We did not leave a door locked or path to be taken … we positively considered the various ideas and initiatives presented by parties. But all of these ideas were repeatedly smashed agaisnt a rock by Israeli negotiations. 12.12pm: Abbas starts off with congratulations to South Sudan for its admission to full UN statehood. “The question of Palestine is intricately linked with the United Nations,” Abbas says, plunging into the issue at hand. 12.09pm: Now it’s Mahmoud Abbas’s turn to take the podium before the UN general assembly. A big round of applause greets him. 12.07pm: Jim Jordan, chair of the influential Republican Study Commitee in Congress, backs the Obama administration’s position on the Palestinian statehood bid: The United States is correct to block the Palestinian Authority’s effort to pursue statehood through the United Nations. It is important that American leaders, from the Congress to the State Department to the White House, send a clear message to the world that we stand shoulder to shoulder with our ally Israel. 11.56am: Chris McGreal watches Mahmoud Abbas hand over the letter to Ban Ki-moon at the UN: Abbas walked in to room with Ban. They stood, shook hands, posed for photos. Then Abbas handed over the application in a large white envelope with the Palestinian Authority crest on it. They shook hands again and that was it: Palestine made its bid to become a member of the United Nations. Abbas and Ban sat down at a table with their officials for a short discussion. Abbas is to speak to the general assembly shortly, as soon as the president of Armenia, Serzh Sargsyan, has finished. Sargsyan is discussing relations with Turkey, another low-point in international relations. There’s a live video feed at the UN website here . 11.49am: Harriet Sherwood, in Ramallah for the Guardian, reports on an unfortunate accident: As crowds gathered in Ramallah’s Manara Square, the celebratory event got off to an unfortunate start when the large screen on which people will watch Mahmoud Abbas’s speech fell forward on top of Palestinian singers who were mid-performance. Three were hit on the head and taken to hospital in neck braces. 11.46am: This just in: Mahmoud Abbas has handed over the letter requesting a UN vote on Palestinian statehood recognition to Ban Ki-moon. Abbas is expected to speak to the general assembly shortly. 11.30am: Anne-Marie Slaughter – the former director of policy planning for the US state department in the Obama administration – regards the US veto of Palestianian statehood in apocalyptic terms in the FT (subscription only): So, fine, let the US issue its veto. Then what? The move is likely to trigger violence in Gaza and possibly the West Bank; Israeli countermeasures risk igniting more anti-Israel demonstrations across the Middle East, particularly in Egypt, and possibly in Syria. In both cases a direct clash between the Israeli and Egyptian or Syrian soldiers in the Sinai or the Golan Heights is all too possible, with potentially catastrophic consequences. Beyond Israel’s immediate neighbourhood the situation is just as bad. Saudi Prince Turki al-Faisal has already said that a US veto would trigger a Saudi re-evaluation of the extent to which it will work with the US, particularly with respect to Iraq and possibly Yemen too. Saudi opposition to the Shia government in Baghdad would destabilise Iraq, and heighten tensions between Saudi Arabia and Iran. The beleaguered Yemeni president is currently in Riyadh; Saudi refusal to co-ordinate its diplomacy in Yemen with the US would make it nearly impossible to resolve the current impasse. These are threats growing daily on the horizon. The move from threat to confrontation may seem unlikely, but remember the inexorable, deadly sequence of mobilisation that turned the assassination of an Austrian archduke into first world war. These things can get out of hand quickly. 11.16am: Quartet envoy Tony Blair told the BBC today that he’s not a supporter of the statehood bid: You can pass whatever resolution you like at the United Nations, or at the Security Council, and it doesn’t actually deliver you a state. And if you don’t have a negotiation, whatever you do at the UN is going to be deeply confrontational. Blair seems to think that statehood recognition somehow precludes peace negotiations, which is not necessarily the case. 11.08am: The Israeli Defence Forces news desk has issued a statement confirming the death in Qusra on the West Bank reported earlier today. The IDF statement is headlined “Events Following Violent Riot near Qusra”: A mutual rock hurling incident that occurred earlier this afternoon between Israeli civilians and approximately 300 Palestinians near the village of Qusra incited a violent riot, during which Palestinians hurled rocks at security personnel. During the riot, security personnel used riot dispersal means and eventually, live fire. As a result, Palestinian sources reported that three rioters were injured. Initial reports suggest that one of them was wounded and subsequently, passed away. The IDF and the Palestinian Security Authority is jointly investigating the incident. 11am: The meeting between Abbas and UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has been brought forward – so that Abbas is expected to deliver requesting statehood recognition very shortly. 10.46am: The Guardian Chris McGreal is at the UN in New York City – and he reports that Mahmoud Abbas is to very shortly submit the letter effectively requesting recognition by the UN security council of Palestine as a state to Ban Ki-moon, the UN’s Secretary-General, before making his speech to the UN general assembly pleading the case: No one expects the Palestinians to win in the security council because the US has said it will veto the request even if the Palestinians get the necessary nine votes in favour – and it looks as if they’ll fall short after an intense American campaign to get countries such as Portugal and Bosnia to abstain. In any case, there is unlikely to be a vote any time soon. But Abbas can claim a victory of sorts at the end of a week that has seen a dramatic shift in the diplomatic ground in the Palestinians’ favour. His resistance to pressure not to submit the request has prompted the most serious attempt to revive the peace process in years as Washington, London and Paris sought to avoid a showdown in the security council that could severely damage their standing in other parts of the Middle East, particularly for Britain and France which are heavily involved in Libya. The US’s claim to dominate mediation has been damaged by its unrelenting opposition to the Palestinian move and Obama’s astonishingly pro-Israel speech to the UN earlier this week. That has provided a chink for the Europeans and Arabs to press for a greater role. Certainly it has exposed Washington as a partisan player. 10.35am: Here’s a brief summary of the background to today’s UN speeches by Abbas and Netanyahu: • Palestinians are to ask for full membership status at the UN, on the grounds that decades of negotiations with Israel have failed to gain it statehood • The move is opposed by Israel and the US, who maintain that the only way to create a fully-fledged Palestinian state is through negotiation • The US has pledged to veto any Palestinian bid for full statehood through the UN Security Council • The Palestinians could opt to go through the UN general assembly – but the assembly only has the power to upgrade Palestine’s status from “entity” to a “non-member state” • Palestine’s improved diplomatic status could allow it to take Israel to the International Criminal Court 10.24am: The Associated Press reports that a Palestinian has been shot dead in a clash with Israeli soldiers and settlers in the West Bank: The incident, witnessed by an AP reporter, began when some 200 settlers burned and uprooted trees Friday near the village of Qusra. Villagers threw stones at the settlers. Israeli troops arrived and fired tear gas, then live rounds. Settlers also fired their weapons. The man killed was identified as 35-year-old Issam Badran. A Palestinian medic says he was shot in the neck. Another Palestinian was wounded and taken by the army. 10.11am: According to Reuters, there appear to be three possible outcomes to the Palestinian plan to seek full UN membership: a miracle, a muddle and a mess: The miracle would be if diplomats dream up a document that may persuade the Israelis and Palestinians to talk peace after nearly a year of impasse and acrimony. The muddle would be if the Palestinian letter requesting full membership simply sits in the UN Security Council’s inbox, ushering in a period of limbo while diplomats try to coax the parties into negotiations. The mess would occur if violence erupts after Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas hands over the letter, throwing the diplomatic efforts to the winds. 10am ET / 3pm BST: Welcome to live coverage of addresses by Palestinian Authority president Mahmoud Abbas and Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu to the UN general assembly in New York – with Abbas expected to argue the case for recognition of Palestine as a state. Abbas is expected to begin speaking sometime after 11.30am ET (4.30pm BST), with Netanyahu to follow in the afternoon, at around 1pm ET (6pm BST). The central issue for both leaders will be Palestine’s admission as a full member state under UN rules. Here’s how the Guardian’s correspondents in New York and Jerusalem previewed today’s actions and potential consequences: The Palestinian leader is expected to hand over a letter asking for Palestine to join the UN as a state shortly before he addresses the general assembly to plead the case for admission. The Israeli prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, is scheduled to speak shortly afterwards. He is likely to denounce the Palestinian move as destabilising and a threat to the peace process – even though that is largely dormant. We’ll be providing live coverage of both speeches here, as well as reaction and feedback from around the world – including in Palestine’s West Bank and in East Jerusalem, where thousands are expected to gather after Friday prayers. United Nations Palestinian territories Israel Binyamin Netanyahu Mahmoud Abbas United States Richard Adams guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Celeb Trainer Fights Ovarian Cancer

Celebrity trainer David Barton is raising funds and awareness for ovarian cancer. Donate and train at a David Barton Gym in New York, Miami, Chicago, Seattle, Las Vegas or Los Angeles on September 24th and proceeds will benefit the cause. (Sept. 23)

Continue reading …
No Answers From Solyndra Execs at Hearing

Executives from a bankrupt California energy company invoked their Fifth Amendment right to avoid self-incrimination in front of a Congressional panel investigating their $528 million government loan. (Sept. 23)

Continue reading …

John Baer offered this column yesterday in the Philadelphia Daily News for United Nations Peace Day: A startling “Costs of War” study, recently released by the Eisenhower Research Project, at Brown University, says our government low-balls war costs, and by a bunch. Figures most often cited by Washington, Obama and the General Accounting Office are $1 trillion to $1.3 trillion. The Brown study, a comprehensive examination and estimate of the full and ongoing price, put together by 20 economists, anthropologists, lawyers and humanitarians, says that it’s at least $3.7 trillion and climbing to $4.4 trillion. Government accounting, the study says, is just too narrow to measure everything. Catherine Lutz, a Brown research professor and the “Costs of War” project co-director, tells me that the Pentagon and GAO report only “direct” or “special war” allocations. There are other costs that are basically hidden. Lutz says that the true costs of wars since 9/11 must also include budget increases for the Pentagon, the State Department and Homeland Security, enormous future-obligated costs to veterans and – since the wars are almost completely financed by borrowing – nearly $200 billion in interest so far, a number constantly climbing. “It’s not really acceptable that the public doesn’t know what the government is obligated to,” she says. One might think that our government purposely hides such short- and long-term encumbrances for fear that a full airing would make our wars much less attractive to the paying public. (The preceding paragraph is an attempt at understatement.) The truth is, military spending and foreign policy take what they want, warranted or not, hide the true cost and answer to no one, all while providing anything but peace. More than 50 years ago, three days before leaving the White House, President Eisenhower addressed the nation and warned of the then-growing powers of what he called “the military/industrial complex.” Here, in part, is what he said: “We must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military/industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist . . . “Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.” Maybe we should have listened. Peace. If you agree, you can join October2011.org on Oct. 6th, when they begin their sit-in at Washington’s Freedom Square.

Continue reading …