It begins sometime in early December, in a screening room near you, with a handful of middle-aged men and women impatiently awaiting the start of a new movie. Related Entries January 27, 2011 Critics Call ‘King’s Speech’ Historically Incorrect January 25, 2011 Sundance and the Art of Democracy
Continue reading …Robert Gibbs calls on President Hosni Mubarak to address ‘legitimate grievances’ of protesters Barack Obama has warned the Egyptian leader, Hosni Mubarak, that he must reform his regime and refrain from violence against protesters. But the US president’s message suggested that Washington will go on supporting its longstanding ally for now. Obama said that he spoke to Mubarak and asked him to turn “a moment of volatility in to a moment of promise,” after the Egyptian leader addressed his nation to say he would replace his government but not tolerate what he called a continued threat to the security of the country from protesters demanding his resignation. “When President Mubarak addressed the Egyptian people tonight he pledged a better democracy and greater economic opportunity,” said Obama. “I told him he has a responsibility to give meaning to those words. To take concrete steps and actions that deliver on that promise. Violence will not address the grievances of the Egyptian people and suppressing ideas never succeeds in making them go away. “What’s needed right now are concrete steps that advance the rights of the Egyptian people; a meaningful dialogue between the government and its citizens and a path of political change that leads to a future of greater freedom and greater opportunity and justice for the Egyptian people.” Obama demanded an end to violence against the protesters after a day of clashes on the streets of Cairo, Suez and other cities left 25 people dead and hundreds wounded. The US president also called on the Egyptian government to restore mobile phone and internet connections it has severed apparently in an attempt to hinder the protesters from organising. But Obama, while pressing for political reform, held back from a call for legitimate elections amid fears in the US and among its allies in other parts of the Middle East, including Israel and Jordan, of political power shifting to the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood. Instead, the White House appears to be looking for reform that will keep the present power structure in place. But it has added to the pressure on Mubarak by saying it is reviewing its $1.5bn (£946m) in annual aid to Egypt, most of it military. The White House spokesman, Robert Gibbs, said continued assistance would in part depend on how the military behaves in the face of the protests. “We will be reviewing our assistance posture based on the outcome of events, now and in the coming days,” he said. Asked if the US government had condemned the placing of the opposition activist, Mohamed ElBaradei, under house arrest, Gibbs said: “Obviously, this goes in to our concern about expression, association and assembly.” Gibbs was also asked about reports that the British company, Vodafone, was responsible for cutting mobile phone access in Egypt on government orders. He said repeated a call for mobile and internet services to be restored but would not be drawn on whether the US would pressure Vodafone directly. “I don’t want to speak about the specific company because I want a little more information,” he said. Egypt US foreign policy Protest Middle East United States Chris McGreal guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …A 68-second video released by Detroit police Friday shows a gunman striding into one of the city’s precinct stations, spraying volleys from a shotgun at surprised officers before being fatally wounded within inches of three of his victims. (Jan. 28)
Continue reading …Egyptian army appears on streets of Cairo in attempt to quell uprising after curfew imposed by Hosni Mubarak is ignored
Continue reading …Mohamed ElBaradei must be free to give political leadership It was the day on which Egyptians lost their fear: of green armoured personnel carriers, which swayed and toppled before the unstoppable tide of human wrath; of plainclothes thugs who had plagued their lives; of the ruling party’s headquarters, from where elections were rigged and parliamentary seats managed – it too went up in flames; of military curfews; of the entire apparatus of a regime which had crushed all political dissent for nearly three decades. “Even if the dogs could speak,” one of the hundreds of thousands who flocked the streets told our reporter, “they would tell you that they are fed up with [Hosni] Mubarak. We have to have change.” This was a transformative day. The Arab world’s largest power had just lost control of the streets of Cairo, Alexandria, Giza, Suez. The regime shut down the internet and unplugged the mobile phone network, a desperate move to stop the protests. It only propelled thousands more on to the streets. As darkness fell, shots were heard in Cairo and tanks were seen in Suez. And still the roar of protest continued. The revolution threatens not only Hosni Mubarak’s regime but the strategy the US and Britain have constructed in the Middle East. The hesitancy with which President Mubarak reacted last night was matched only by the perceptible shift in the emphasis of the statements by the US secretary of state, Hillary Clinton. Only two days ago she said the US assessment was that the Egyptian government was stable and was looking for ways to respond to the legitimate interests of the Egyptian people. The primary importance of keeping a key Arab ally and Middle East interlocutor stable was also emphasised yesterday by Tony Blair, the Quartet’s envoy. Faced with the conflicting needs to keep an Arab partner of Israel afloat and to respond to demands for democratic reform, the US would choose the first every time. After yesterday’s events, Ms Clinton’s calls to lift internet controls and respond to the grievances of Egyptians became more strident. But it was too little, too late. Ms Clinton’s initial support for the Mubarak regime had not been lost on Egyptians battling for their freedoms. This is not to say that a post-Mubarak regime would tear up Egypt’s peace treaty with Israel or in the short term be any less cordial in its official relations with its neighbour. But in the longer term a government which reflected the popular will of the people of Egypt would surely open the country’s land border with Gaza and not block unity talks between Fatah and Hamas. If Mubarak’s regime fell, the Palestinian Authority would also lose a vital backer and ally. The domino that toppled Egypt could also topple less secure regimes like Jordan and Yemen, in which smaller but no less significant demonstrations were taking place yesterday. As Mr Mubarak last night imposed a nationwide curfew, the biggest question hung over what role, if any, the army would play. Compared to the interior ministry, it is popular. Protesters initially cheered the arrival of troops on the streets, in the hope that they would be protected from the police. This is the world’s 10th largest army, from which all four Egyptian presidents since the fall of the monarchy have come. It has formed the core of the elite that has sustained the president’s rule. Will it enforce an increasingly bloody security crackdown or act as an invaluable mediator between the people and a regime they are demanding must go? It is impossible to predict. What the president has to do now is to announce that he will release the people he has locked up. Mohamed ElBaradei, the former head of the UN nuclear watchdog, who was briefly detained yesterday, must be free to give political leadership. Mr Mubarak must rule out a sixth term as president, and set up a council to rewrite the constitution. Even those measures might not be sufficient to stop the crowds. This revolt has a momentum of its own. Egypt Middle East Protest US foreign policy Foreign policy guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Your average hydrogen-powered car is a marvel of modern science — fuel cell sifting electrons out of pure H2 and emitting nothing but water — powered by big, heavy, high-pressure tanks of gas. Cella Energy is here to ditch the tank, having first developed a means of storing hydrogen in microfibers that could greatly simplify the design of these vehicles. But, perhaps even more impressive is a “synthetic fuel” the company is working on which is, essentially, pure hydrogen captured into microbeads. You know, like the kind that float in your shampoo and give your hair that extra lustre, but explosive. According to Cella these beads can be poured into the gas tank of a car with an internal combustion engine (presumably suspended in some sort of liquid) and, with no modification, that car will run just fine. Best news is that this concoction costs just $1.50 per gallon — or will, eventually. Supposedly. Maybe? Cella Energy says its hydrogen microbeads could fuel your car, cost $1.50 per gallon originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 28 Jan 2011 19:44:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …