Republican Guards clash with renegade soldiers as President Ali Abdullah Saleh flies in after months recuperating in Riyadh Tentative hopes for a way out of Yemen’s eight-month political crisis have been plunged into confusion by the sudden return of President Ali Abdullah Saleh after three months spent recovering in Saudi Arabia from an assassination attempt. Saleh’s abrupt reappearance follows five days of brutal violence in the capital in which more than 100 protesters have been shot dead, some by government troops using anti-aircraft guns. Sana’a is now gripped by street battles and exchanges of shelling between Republican Guards led by Saleh’s son and a division of renegade soldiers who have been backing the pro-democracy demonstrators. Hours after touching down, Saleh called for a truce between the two sides. “The solution is not in the mouths of rifles and guns, it is in dialogue and stopping bloodshed,” the defence ministry cited him as saying. But it was not immediately clear whether those battling with Saleh’s troops were willing to heed his call for peace. The sound of mortars echoed off the mountains surrounding the capital late into the evening as clashes continued. Word of the president’s dawn arrival was spread with the sound of celebratory gunfire. A brief clip on Yemeni state television showed Saleh clutching a walking stick and tentatively descending steps from a private jet at Sana’a airport. For many the president’s arrival came as a shock. Western diplomats in Sana’a, even members of Saleh’s ruling party, seemed to have no clue it was planned. Saudi princes and US diplomats are now scrambling to embrace a new political scenario with Saleh back in Yemen instead of having him cornered in a luxurious, marbled palace in Riyadh. By noon Sana’a was a divided city. Thousands gathered outside the president’s mosque hoping to catch a glimpse of Saleh. “Thank God for his safe arrival. This is the best day in Yemen’s history, no man can rule Yemen except Ali Saleh,” said an emotional middle-aged man, flipping out an ID card to prove his name, Ali Abdullah Saleh, matched that of the president. A few miles north 100,000 anti-government protesters filled a two-mile stretch of motorway for a Friday prayer ceremony. Faizah Suleiman, one of a number of prominent female leaders at the march, said she expected Saleh’s return to coincide with an even more brutal crackdown on their movement, saying: “If we’re still alive we’ll march this afternoon.” This time last week Change Square – the tented shantytown in the heart of the capital – was a sanctuary for Yemen’s pro-democracy dissidents. On Friday Yesterday it was a scene of chaos and despair. A blood-splattered tent, slashed open at the seams, marked the spot where an anti-aircraft missile landed on Wednesday , killing its occupier. Protesters distributed plastic helmets in a desperate effort to protect themselves from the bullets of plain-clothed pro-government snipers prowling the rooftops of nearby houses. Saleh’s motives remain unclear. Rumours that he was preparing to address his party, the General People’s Congress, and announce his resignation proved to be unfounded. Experts say that by returning to Yemen and then resigning, Saleh could expose himself to the risk of prosecution, a possible explanation for his hesitancy. Gregory Johnson, a Yemen scholar from Princeton University, said the timing of his return was “a characteristic Saleh move … He has done this many times in the past, setting himself up as national saviour between two competing sides.” Many are concerned that Saleh’s sudden reappearance may draw Yemen’s powerful tribal leaders into the fray. When Saleh was airlifted to Saudi Arabia for treatment after an explosion ripped through his compound in June , Sadeq Al-Ahmar, the sheikh at the head of Yemen’s most influential tribe, the Hashed, swore “by God” that he would never let Saleh rule again. The last time hostilities between the Saleh and Ahmar families turned violent in May, a week’s worth of mortar battles erupted, flattening an entire neighbourhood in the capital’s east and killing hundreds. Yemen Middle East Arab and Middle East unrest Protest Tom Finn guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …A spending showdown in Congress is prompting a partisan rift so raw that an effort to help disaster victims has become mired in disputes over jobs, the national debt and the other contentious issues. (Sept. 23)
Continue reading …A baby leopard cub was presented to the public for the first time on Thursday at Rome’s Bioparco zoo. A dark, shaky video showed the first shots of the Iranian leopard cub, born on September 1 at the zoo. (Sept. 23)
Continue reading …Type: DVD Title: Scholastic Storybook Treasures: Treasury of 100 Storybook Classics Two See all customer reviews Product Description: Disk 1 – 36 mins Goodnight Moon Disk 2 – 60 mins Corduroy Disk 3 – 61 mins Good Night, Gorilla Disk 4 – 132 mins The Wheels on the Bus Disk 5 – 65 mins There Was an Old Lady Who Swallowed a Fly Disk 6 – 67 mins Is Your Mama a Llama? Disk 7 – 84 mins Giggle Giggle Quack Disk 8 – 119 mins The Hans Christian Andersen Collection Disk 9 – 83 mins The James Marshall Fairytale Collection Disk 10 – 60 mins He s Got the Whole World in His Hands Disk 11 – 60 mins Antarctic Antics Disk 12 – 59 mins The Teacher From the Black Lagoon Disk 13 – 61 mins Miss Nelson Has a Field Day Disk 14 – 59 mins Crazy Hair Day Disk 15 – 76 mins So You Want to Be President? Disk 16 – 73 mins The Night Before Christmas Disk 17 – 62 mins A Very Brave Witch Features: SCHOLASTIC TREASURY OF 100 CLASSICS #2 (DVD MOVIE) Actors: Animation See the details
Continue reading …In a Thursday morning post setting the table for last night’s Republican presidential debate in Orlando, New York Times chief “Caucus” blog reporter Michael Shear became the latest Timesman to falsely finger the Tea Party audience at a CNN debate last week as cheering on the prospect of letting a hypothetical man die for lack of health insurance. Shear listed six things to watch for in Orlando last night. The last item: Give me liberty or… This debate will feature two fierce libertarians — Gary Johnson and Ron Paul — which should make for some interesting moments. Mr. Johnson has been excluded from most of the recent debates because of his low standing in the polls, but Fox News organizers said he managed to exceed 1 percent in five recent polls, the minimum standard they set for participation. Mr. Johnson, a former New Mexico governor, is probably best known for his support of the legalization of marijuana and other drugs — something Mr. Paul has also supported — so that issue is likely to re-emerge in this debate. And following the last debate, when Mr. Paul was asked whether a young man without health insurance should be left to go without treatment — which was greeted with some chants of “let him die” from the crowd — expect more questions along these lines. Has anyone at the Times actually watched the debate clip? It was debate moderator Wolf Blitzer who actually used the words “let him die,” when asking candidate Ron Paul a loaded question about letting a hypothetical man die for lack of health insurance. There is no auditory evidence anyone at all in the crowd shouted such a thing, much less enough people to form a constant “chant.” Columnist Paul Krugman on September 16 also falsely claimed “the crowd erupted with cheers and shouts of ‘Yeah!’” after Blitzer pressed Paul on the case of the hypothetical young man without health insurance, asking whether “society should just let him die.” Washington Post blogger Erik Wemple fact-checked the horrified liberal response of commentators like Krugman. This is how Wemple described what happened after debate host Wolf Blitzer raised his inflammatory question ( you can watch the clip at the Post ). A few jeers? Yes. Heckles? No question. “Audience” cheers? No way. The voices that can be heard in the video — perhaps two or three of them — don’t constitute an “audience” reaction. There were 1,100 people in the crowd. The episode is the clumsy work of a few loons or meatheads in the audience.
Continue reading …President Ali Abdullah Saleh returned today to the violence-torn Yemeni capital after more than three months of medical treatment in Saudi Arabia in a surprise move certain to further enflame battles between forces loyal to him and his opponents. Saleh left Yemen for Saudi Arabia in early June after he…
Continue reading …In Case You Missed It of the Day: It seems every GOP debate is determined to have that one moment sheer callousness that makes you fret for humanity’s future — and last night’s FOX News/Google debate did not disappoint. Moderator Megyn Kelly introduced a YouTube question about “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” from a now-openly-gay soldier serving his country in Iraq, after which several audience members could… Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : The Daily What Discovery Date : 23/09/2011 06:38 Number of articles : 4
Continue reading …In Case You Missed It of the Day: It seems every GOP debate is determined to have that one moment sheer callousness that makes you fret for humanity’s future — and last night’s FOX News/Google debate did not disappoint. Moderator Megyn Kelly introduced a YouTube question about “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” from a now-openly-gay soldier serving his country in Iraq, after which several audience members could… Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : The Daily What Discovery Date : 23/09/2011 06:38 Number of articles : 4
Continue reading …Unions fear use of British Airways-style tactics after employers’ group suggests that hospital trusts take legal advice Hospitals are being advised to consider blocking tactics to thwart as many as 700,000 staff taking industrial action on 30 November as part of the public sector day of action over pensions. Guidance from NHS Employers to the 400 hospital trusts and other care providers in England that it represents recommends they seek legal advice on preventing strikes. A document called Managing Industrial Disputes: Guidance for Employers in the NHS advises them to decide “if the unions may be acting unlawfully” and consider taking court action, depending on the risks and costs. Unions fear the advice will see hospitals seeking court orders to frustrate strikes by claiming that ballots have not been conducted in accordance with Britain’s tough employment laws. “This guidance does incite employers to consider using British Airways-style tactics and to try and trip unions up with legal technicalities,” said Rachael Maskell, a national officer for health with the union Unite, which represents about 100,000 NHS staff. BA has used trade union laws over the past 18 months to challenge strike ballots by cabin crew in the high court. Under the 1992 Trade Union and Labour Relations Act industrial action is illegal unless unions have complied with a range of legal responsibilities such as telling employers how many staff they are balloting, the result of the ballot and what type of action is planned, where and when. In 2009 a 12-day Christmas strike by BA cabin crew affiliated to Unite was thrown out because a ballot of more than 12,000 crew included 900 votes cast by employees who had taken voluntary redundancy, technically rendering their papers invalid. In 2010 a national rail strike at Network Rail by the RMT union was halted on a similar basis, when it transpired that the RMT had polled signal workers at defunct signal boxes. “We would be extremely concerned if this guidance could be interpreted as intimidating or designed to thwart the democratic process that trade unions are going through with their members,” said Lesley Mercer, director of employment services at the Chartered Society of Physiotherapists, which will decide next week whether to ballot its 35,000 members in the NHS about joining the day of action. Unions have recently been updating their records of members and of employers that would be affected by industrial action. Dean Royles, the director of NHS Employers, said that as well as wanting to minimise the impact on patient care, NHS organisations “will also want to ensure any action planned is lawful”. He also warned unions that “trade unions should be aware that the significant cost of industrial action – caused by factors such as the need to fill gaps in the workforce and reschedule elective operations – will only make it harder for the NHS to avoid job losses.” NHS Health Public sector pensions Public services policy Trade unions Public sector cuts Public finance Public sector pay Denis Campbell Dan Milmo guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Unions fear use of British Airways-style tactics after employers’ group suggests that hospital trusts take legal advice Hospitals are being advised to consider blocking tactics to thwart as many as 700,000 staff taking industrial action on 30 November as part of the public sector day of action over pensions. Guidance from NHS Employers to the 400 hospital trusts and other care providers in England that it represents recommends they seek legal advice on preventing strikes. A document called Managing Industrial Disputes: Guidance for Employers in the NHS advises them to decide “if the unions may be acting unlawfully” and consider taking court action, depending on the risks and costs. Unions fear the advice will see hospitals seeking court orders to frustrate strikes by claiming that ballots have not been conducted in accordance with Britain’s tough employment laws. “This guidance does incite employers to consider using British Airways-style tactics and to try and trip unions up with legal technicalities,” said Rachael Maskell, a national officer for health with the union Unite, which represents about 100,000 NHS staff. BA has used trade union laws over the past 18 months to challenge strike ballots by cabin crew in the high court. Under the 1992 Trade Union and Labour Relations Act industrial action is illegal unless unions have complied with a range of legal responsibilities such as telling employers how many staff they are balloting, the result of the ballot and what type of action is planned, where and when. In 2009 a 12-day Christmas strike by BA cabin crew affiliated to Unite was thrown out because a ballot of more than 12,000 crew included 900 votes cast by employees who had taken voluntary redundancy, technically rendering their papers invalid. In 2010 a national rail strike at Network Rail by the RMT union was halted on a similar basis, when it transpired that the RMT had polled signal workers at defunct signal boxes. “We would be extremely concerned if this guidance could be interpreted as intimidating or designed to thwart the democratic process that trade unions are going through with their members,” said Lesley Mercer, director of employment services at the Chartered Society of Physiotherapists, which will decide next week whether to ballot its 35,000 members in the NHS about joining the day of action. Unions have recently been updating their records of members and of employers that would be affected by industrial action. Dean Royles, the director of NHS Employers, said that as well as wanting to minimise the impact on patient care, NHS organisations “will also want to ensure any action planned is lawful”. He also warned unions that “trade unions should be aware that the significant cost of industrial action – caused by factors such as the need to fill gaps in the workforce and reschedule elective operations – will only make it harder for the NHS to avoid job losses.” NHS Health Public sector pensions Public services policy Trade unions Public sector cuts Public finance Public sector pay Denis Campbell Dan Milmo guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …