Home » Archives by category » News (Page 8039)

Anderson Cooper may have been the highest-profile journalist attacked today , but he’s far from the only one. (See the video gallery for CNN footage of the assault). Mediaite says reporters from the AP, the BBC, a Danish newspaper, and Israeli TV also were roughed up. Katie Couric had to cut…

Continue reading …
Right-wingers don’t care if Planned Parenthood video was already exposed as a hoax — they’ll do it live!

Click here to view this media It tells you just how degraded our national discourse has become — how utterly corrupted by the Fox Propaganda Channel it has been — that two of its leading anchors can run an entire segment legitimizing a hoax video tape, even though its contents were exposed as a hoax even before they were released. And no one even so much as raises an eyebrow. That’s what happened last night on The O’Reilly Factor, when Bill O’Reilly and Fox’s John Stossel devoted an entire segment to attacking Planned Parenthood as “disgusting” for the supposed behavior revealed in another Breitbartesque attack by video hoax on another liberal institution. O’Reilly and Stossel, however, then use the affair to launch into attacking Planned Parenthood for receiving taxpayer subsidies — and that really is what they’re on about. Interestingly, Stossel uses the logic that because some people see abortion as murder, they are being forced to underwrite murder in their views — a position O’Reilly ardently adopts as well. Peculiar that neither of them apply the same logic elsewhere: Many people see killing innocent civilians in the course of a war as murder too — something our tax dollars likewise heavily underwrite. But you’ll never see an O’Reilly segment attacking taxpayer funding for the DoD. But what’s truly disgraceful that they then dismiss the overwhelming fact that Planned Parenthood had already reported these “sex traffickers” to authorities — thereby exposing the hoax in progress. Here’s their release of last week: Last week, Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) alerted federal authorities to a potential multistate sex trafficking ring. Over a five day period, visitors to Planned Parenthood health centers in six states said they were seeking information from Planned Parenthood about health services Planned Parenthood could provide to underage girls who were part of a sex trafficking ring. Subsequent to alerting U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, Planned Parenthood learned the identify of one of those involved and believes these visits are likely a hoax by opponents of legal abortion seeking to discredit Planned Parenthood, which delivers preventive health care and abortion services to three million women each year. Media Matters has the full details of the hoax. Yet, in spite of all this, when Lila Rose and Co. published the video yesterday, it was widely treated through Unsurprisingly, the wingnutosphere ran whole-hog in embracing the video as legitimate, including the fine folks at National Review, RedState and Malkin’s Hot Air. Moreover, as Ned Resnikoff at Media Matters explored in some detail, Rose’s video actually pretty clearly demonstrates the falsity of what she claims it shows: In a so-called “sting” video professional hit artist Lila Rose claims to have uncovered evidence of systemic corruption within Planned Parenthood to cover up “child sex trafficking.” Not only do Planned Parenthoods recent actions flatly contradict that claim — so does the content of the video itself. In fact, even if we were to assume that Rose’s heavily edited smear job is accurate – and there are plenty of reasons to be skeptical – the video very clearly establishes that the alleged wrongdoing is counter to Planned Parenthood policy: the employee on Rose’s tape makes it clear that the actions in question would have to be concealed from others at the organization. You can judge for yourself. Here’s the video: Click here to view this media People for the American Way also has a terrific rundown of the facts: Anti-abortion activist Lila Rose, a photogenic young activist who Religious Right leaders hope to make the new face of the anti-abortion movement, claims that the video Religious Right groups are circulating “proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that Planned Parenthood intentionally breaks state and federal laws and covers up the abuse of young girls it claims to serve.” False. In fact, far from proving a pattern of illegal activity, the Live Action project demonstrated that Planned Parenthood has strong institutional procedures in place to protect young women. When Live Action activists appeared at numerous facilities presenting themselves as seeking help with a child sex trafficking ring, Planned Parenthood wrote to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder requesting an FBI investigation. Live Action attempted its “sting” across the country; the one Planned Parenthood staffer who violated those procedures and is featured in Live Action’s video was fired. There’s a lot more on Rose’s background there as well.

Continue reading …
Finally! San Francisco is Considering a Ban on Unsolicited Phonebooks

Photo: withassociates , CC Letting People Choose?! What a Strange Concept! We’ve had some phonebook coverage recently (see the links at the end of this post) and it caused quite a reaction from you, our dear readers. It’s understandable: While phonebooks aren’t that important in the grand scheme of things, they are a very obvious and concrete (you can touch it, unlike wasted energy or CO2) example of waste for the people who get them and don’t need them. But the city of San Francis… Read the full story on TreeHugger

Continue reading …
Mohamed ElBaradei urges world leaders to abandon Hosni Mubarak

Criminal acts by government-backed thugs and a regime killing its own people make negotiations impossible, says Nobel laureate Mohamed ElBaradei has called on the international community to urgently withdraw support from “a regime that is killing its people”, following a day of intense violence in Cairo that left at least one dead and several hundred more injured. The Nobel peace laureate, who some want to see leading a transitional government in a post-Mubarak Egypt, told the Guardian that the “criminal acts” of government-backed thugs in the capital yesterday had made any negotiations with the Mubarak regime impossible. “Today’s violence is again an indication of a criminal regime that has lost any common sense,” said ElBaradei. “We have no intention whatsoever – at least I speak for myself on this – in engaging in dialogue with this regime until the number one person responsible for this, who is Mubarak, leaves the country. He must get out.” Following a speech by Mubarak on Tuesday night in which the Egyptian leader promised to step down in September, there had been speculation that a loose coalition of anti-Mubarak groups would rethink their refusal to accept an offer of discussions with newly appointed vice-president Omar Suleiman. But amid scenes of running street battles between anti-government protesters and pro-Mubarak forces, many of whom were found to be carrying police identification, ElBaradei said the opposition’s resolve to force Mubarak out immediately had only been strengthened. “First of all this is not a negotiation – we the people have legitimate demands and we would like to tell the government what to do. Our freedom is not up for negotiation. Secondly how can you negotiate with a regime that is killing its people? When the regime tries to counter a peaceful demonstration by using thugs, some of whom are police officers in plain clothes – we’ve seen their IDs – there are few words that do justice to this villainy and I think it can only hasten that regime’s departure.” “After today people are realising just what they’re dealing with,” added the 68-year-old. “Now they’re not just talking about the man responsible leaving the country, they’re also talking about putting him on trial. If he has an iota of dignity left, he should leave. Mubarak has received a vote of no confidence by the entire Egyptian people … I hope he has the intelligence to realise that it is better for him to leave now before the country continues to go down the drain, economically and socially.” Despite the bloodshed, ElBaradei called on pro-change demonstrators to continue taking to the streets in huge numbers. “I think Friday will be a very big day in that respect. But even if they don’t, even if they are repressed and crushed, there is still no going back. This is a new era – just look in protesters’ eyes. The Egyptians have grown in confidence, they’ve tasted freedom, and there’s no way back.” He also confirmed that he had been contacted in recent days by the British government as well as a number of other international leaders. “My message to them is simple: the sooner Mubarak leaves, the better it is for everybody and the quicker we can restore normality and stability in Egypt and establish the cornerstone of democracy in the Middle East.” ElBaradei’s appeals were echoed by members of the Muslim Brotherhood, Egypt’s largest Islamist opposition group and ElBaradei’s partners in the newly-formed National Committee for Following up the People’s Demands. Analysts believe that with Molotov cocktails being thrown in Cairo, a final confrontation between protesters and the establishment is imminent. Egypt Middle East Protest Hosni Mubarak Mohamed ElBaradei Jack Shenker guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Mubarak supporters fight to take over Egypt’s Tahrir Square

Claims that plainclothes police hidden in ranks as battles take place in the symbolic epicentre of the revolution The men came with baseball bats and pieces of broken window frame, machetes and even a homemade spear. Forming a line, the small group of plainclothes policemen blocked one of the broad boulevards leading into Tahrir Square, the symbolic epicentre of the Egyptian revolution. The police had been driven from the streets they are so used to controlling last Friday and now they had come to reclaim what they regarded as rightfully theirs. As they gathered on Qasr el-Aini, they prepared themselves for confrontation with the protesters who had humiliated them and their president. Yesterday was not a day of revolution. It was the beginning of a vicious counter-revolution in support of Hosni Mubarak’s regime, one that seemed set fair to confirm all his critics’ fears. The day after hundreds of thousands of anti-Mubarak demonstrators had filled Tahrir Square to demand his ousting, the supporters of Egypt’s president of 30 years had come to reclaim it with violence. The men came by car and on foot, some even on camel and horseback, arriving as Mubarak’s regime – in a dramatic U-turn – defiantly rejected international calls for an orderly transition of power. The moment the square was stormed came a few minutes before 2pm. In the hours beforehand, the crowds of pro-Mubarak demonstrators had poured over the Nile bridges to gather on the Corniche outside the state-run TV station, a symbol of Mubarak’s rule half a mile up the road. Egypt’s army, which had said it would not use force on the demonstrators, did nothing to prevent them. What happened next was inevitable as tens of thousands of the regime’s supporters – some of whom had been bussed in from the countryside or were civil servants given a day’s holiday – forced their way into the square. Within minutes scuffles had broken out between the sides that saw bricks hurled and savage beatings delivered with staves. Suddenly, the centre of Cairo divided into two battling factions pelting each other with stones. An hour later, dozens of wounded demonstrators were being treated at an open-air aid station at the entrance to the square. Many had blood streaming from wounds. According to the first reports, by early evening at least one person had died and 600 were injured. It was the pro-Mubarak demonstrators – many of whom were summoned by a text message calling on “Egypt lovers” to congregate at Tahrir – who threw the first rocks, catching their opponents unawares. Soon the pro-democracy protesters were holding up sheets of corrugated metal ripped from a construction site to use as shields against the hail of missiles. Some of the pro-Mubarak demonstrators who were captured by the opposition, it was claimed last night, were carrying ID cards that identified them as police. At 3pm, in an extraordinary development, men mounted on horseback entered the square on the regime’s side, creating an almost medieval tableau. Within two hours Molotov cocktails were being thrown while bursts of automatic weapons fire could be heard. After the peace and celebration of the previous days, it came as a shock to witness such violence in the square. A war, primitive and brutal, had broken out, and its frontline was the country’s famous Egyptian Museum. “Why don’t you protect us?” some of the opposition protesters shouted at soldiers, who replied they did not have orders to do so and told people to go home. “The army is neglectful. They let them [the pro-regimists] in,” said Emad Nafa, 52, who for days had praised the army for remaining neutral. Mubarak supporters managed to gain control of the roofs of two of the main buildings while young men in crash helmets, volunteers on the opposition side, acted as stretcher-bearers. Some of the gunfire could be observed. Guardian reporter Mustafa Khalili watched as one soldier stood on his tank and fired at a pro-Mubarak demonstrator who had targeted him with a rock. Another Guardian reporter saw grown men crying at the chaos and bloodshed on their streets. “When we were fighting the central security forces last week it was liberating,” said one member of the anti-Mubarak opposition. “Yet now we are fighting each other and that breaks my heart.” Anti-government protesters, streaming with blood, were taken to makeshift clinics in mosques and alleyways, some begging the impassive soldiers for protection. “Hosni has opened the door for these thugs to attack us,” one man with a loudspeaker shouted to the crowds during the fighting. “After the revolution, they want to send people here to ruin it for us,” said Ahmed Abdullah, a 47-year-old lawyer. “Why do they want us to be at each other’s throats, with the whole world watching us?” At first some of those on the pro-regime side tried to protect opponents being beaten. The Guardian saw a man being pulled out from the flying fists. But such camaraderie did not last long. It was not only in Cairo that Mubarak’s regime moved to crush dissent with an orchestrated show of force that included the clear collusion of the military. There were pro-regime protests in Egypt’s second city, Alexandria. Earlier yesterday in Tahrir Square, it seemed initially that the supporters of the regime had orders to avoid conflict. At first their demonstration mirrored scenes from Tahrir Square from the past week, when anti-Mubarak protesters led mostly peaceful rallies. Some prayed. A policeman was carried on the shoulders of the crowd – just as a deserting soldier had been carried by the opposition only days before. They carried their pictures of Mubarak and stuck them on tanks – just as the opposition had done with its own slogans and symbols. And while some admitted that they had been bussed from outside the capital in organised groups, others had come for more complex reasons. As the demonstration began, they chanted: “Yes! Mubarak!” “Mubarak is our hero” and “Baradei must go.” But among those interviewed by the Guardian were men who said they had swapped sides after Mubarak’s televised address to the nation on Tuesday night, offering concessions and promising not to stand in elections later this year. “People should leave Tahrir Square,” said Mohamed Megahid, 30, a quality control manager. “The president has made the concessions he was asked for. So now people can go home. If he tries to undo the changes, we can always go back again,” he said. “There needs to be time for change. We cannot just press a button.” Tarik Abdel Yazid, 40, asked: “Those people in the square – where does the money come from?. All those people are being supported by outside, by Qatar, Iran and Hamas.” Their gathering was shot through with bitterness at the jeers that had been hurled against the 82-year-old Mubarak over the past nine days. “I feel humiliated,” said Mohammed Hussein, a 31-year-old factory worker. “He is the symbol of our country. When he is insulted, I am insulted.” By late last night, contact with those trapped in the square was limited to desperate tweets as most journalists were driven out. They spoke chillingly of the army withdrawing from the sidestreets around the square and gangs of pro-Mubarak thugs advancing towards them armed with knives and swords. “God help us all,” said one. Egypt Hosni Mubarak Middle East Protest Peter Beaumont Jack Shenker Mustafa Khalili guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Why the camera isn’t the culprit for the white iPhone 4′s delay (update: Woz responds)

Unless you’ve been away from the Internet over the last few days, you would’ve no doubt heard about Woz’s special appearance at the Engadget Show on Sunday. Unsurprisingly, a few websites ran with some quotes that they pulled from our interview — specifically, the highlight was Woz “confirming” that the white iPhone 4 was indeed delayed due to camera issues. Well, I don’t think this is the case at all. In fact, I’m sure there are plenty of other good reasons for why Apple’s been delaying the much anticipated flavor of its flagship smartphone, but the camera just isn’t one of them. Head right past the break and all will be explained. Update: Our man Woz has just responded in the comments: I said plenty to make it clear that I know nothing of Apple’s reasons for rejecting anything ever. I told how when I got my white iPhone 4 assembled I tested the flash photos and they did indeed have problems. I spoke of testing flash photos versus non-flash ones and comparing flash photos between my white and black iPhones. I don’t recall saying that it was a ‘reason’ Apple rejected the parts although I had read that. For the last part, we were referring to 0:55 in the interview video after the break, but now that Woz has spoken, it could’ve been a joke at the time that got misinterpreted by some websites. They tend to do that with Woz. Read on! Continue reading Why the camera isn’t the culprit for the white iPhone 4′s delay (update: Woz responds) Why the camera isn’t the culprit for the white iPhone 4′s delay (update: Woz responds) originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:20:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink

Continue reading …
US condemns Egypt violence as attempt to manage political crisis fails

White House repeats Barack Obama’s call for Mubarak to begin sharing power but falls short of public demand for resignation The White House condemned the violence in Cairo as “outrageous and deplorable” as it held crisis meetings over the collapse of its attempts to manage the transition in the face of Hosni Mubarak’s defiance. The administration was trying to decide whether to publicly call for Mubarak’s immediate resignation, after Barack Obama was accused of badly misjudging the popular mood by seeming to accept the Egyptian president will remain in power during the transition. The White House spokesman, Robert Gibbs, condemned the unleashing of what, it appeared he presumed, were state-sponsored attacks on pro-democracy demonstrators, in the face of a direct call from Obama that there should be no violence. “If any of the violence is instigated by the government, it should stop immediately,” he said. The White House repeated the US president’s call for Mubarak to immediately begin sharing power but again fell short of a public demand for immediate resignation. “The time for a transition has come and that time is now,” said Gibbs. “The Egyptian people need to see change. We know that that meaningful transition must include opposition voices and parties being involved in this process as we move toward free and fair elections.” Although Obama in his speech on Tuesday demanded the transition begin immediately, he did not directly challenge Mubarak’s claim to remain in power until elections and oversee the change. However, White House officials said that while Obama was ambiguous in public about the timing of Mubarak’s departure, he was more direct in a conversation with the Egyptian president in a phone call on Tuesday night, telling him he needed to move towards an earlier departure. However, the violence may force the White House’s hand. Steve Clemons, of the New America Foundation thinktank who has been consulted by the White House on the Egypt crisis, said that Obama views the assault on the demonstrators in Cairo as a breach in relations with Mubarak. “The administration sees the social contract it thought that it had with Mubarak behind the scenes being violated,” he said. “It’s a violation of what Obama has been most strongly calling for. This raises the stakes on whether Obama escalates his calls, and whether he takes some of the things he’s been saying privately to Mubarak in to a public forum. I don’t think the president has any other options now.” Clemons said that he is pressing the White House to demand Mubarak resign immediately, because it is the only solution acceptable to the mass of Egyptians, but added that he believes the administration is still hesitant to do so. The US is also not in a rush to get to elections, as the White House finally seeks to engage with the Muslim Brotherhood while trying to give time for secular political parties to establish themselves and challenge the Islamist group at the ballot box. American analysts were united yesterday in saying that Obama had taken a risk in supporting a transition to democracy, given that Mubarak has so long been a pillar of US foreign policy. Robert Satloff, of the Washington Institute and author of the Army and Politics in Mubarak’s Egypt, also saw Obama as taking a risk but praised him for the “breathtaking change” in policy towards Egypt within a week, from backing him to calling on him to go. “Last night’s statement was nothing if not bold,” Satloff said. The imagery of Mubarak saying he would stay on for eight more months and Obama an hour later talking about transition “now” would have a powerful impact in the Middle East, Satloff said. US foreign policy United States Barack Obama Egypt Chris McGreal Ewen MacAskill guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Cairo clashes: How chants turned to violence between pro and anti-Mubarak factions

‘Scores of people were getting hit’ says witness injured in Egyptian demonstration I was watching a pro-Mubarak demo half a mile from Tahrir Square: about 300 to 400 people, who grew to thousands as they made their way to the square. It was a mixed crowd, with women and children chanting peacefully in support of their president and many carrying photos of him. The problems started as this crowd got to the square and ran into the demonstrators calling for Mubarak to stand down. Both sides chanted at each other; one lot pro, the other anti. Suddenly the pro-Mubarak protesters charged. A few of them shouted “Forward! Forward!” then hundreds charged towards the demonstrators. And then some of them started picking up rocks to throw. It was a barrage, not just one or two. But for a good 10 minutes the anti-Mubarak crowd resisted responding. At one point mediators within the pro-Mubarak lot tried to make them calm down, shouting “Peaceful”. Unfortunately this didn’t last long. Before you knew it, the anti-Mubarak demonstrators were throwing rocks back. The distance apart was 20 metres, and it was a constant stream of rocks. Scores of people were getting hit. I saw a young child hit in one leg so she couldn’t walk; an older woman was hit in the head and bleeding profusely. I was hit during a charge by the pro-Mubarak lot, struck on my head by a rock which knocked me to the ground. I was bleeding heavily. People took me to a makeshift medical centre run by nurses who had obviously come straight from hospital to help, where they bandaged my head. They said I needed stitches, but there were so many other injured to look after.. There must have been more than 50 injuries, some of them horrific. I saw one guy whose left eye was bleeding, men with broken arms, broken teeth where they had just been hit in the face by rocks There were no police, no security forces. The army was there, but was not intervening. The two sets of protesters were left to fight it out. Injured pro-Mubarak supporters were being taken into the Square for treatment. Some of the demonstrators tried to attack them on the way in for treatment but others were shielding and protecting them and calling for unity, saying ‘These are our brothers’. People with more serious injuries were taken out towards ambulances and driven away. The demonstrators in Tahrir Square were far bigger in numbers than the pro-Mubarak lot but as the evening went on the pro-Mubarak forces started getting stronger. The main skirmish had been going on in the Square, but there were other struggles on the roads leading in. I had been trying to leave but I couldn’t get out. When I finally left, there were Mubarak supporters carrying metal gym weights, with Molotov cocktails being thrown and sporadic gunfire. That was about 5pm UK time. They now won’t let anyone into the Square. If people aren’t being kettled by the army it’s by the protesters themselves who are trying to control things. It’s still going on right now. Mustafa Khalili is a video producer at the Guardian Egypt Middle East Protest Hosni Mubarak Mustafa Khalili guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

Las Vegas casinos are readying their defenses against a group of baccarat cheaters, the Las Vegas Sun reports. The group, known as “cutters” and described by police as “extremely well-organized,” are thought to have stolen tens of millions from casinos worldwide. They take advantage of the baccarat custom in which…

Continue reading …
Bird’s Eye Lowdown On The Future Of Solar Power

Image credit: all images in this post are courtesy of Silverado Power. Have you noticed. as I have, that widely reported solar projects in the USA have spectacular or controversial attributes? Computer simulations of huge projects in desert settings were very big in 2010 – creating a stereotype, I’d say. Extra reporting points for protests by environmentalists, charges of government socialism, or a suitably-phallic central heat collection tower. Could the USA miss important opportunities to mainstream renewable energy by focusing on novelty aspects of big solar projects? Yes! Are there subtle public policy choi… Read the full story on TreeHugger

Continue reading …