Anderson Cooper may have been the highest-profile journalist attacked today , but he’s far from the only one. (See the video gallery for CNN footage of the assault). Mediaite says reporters from the AP, the BBC, a Danish newspaper, and Israeli TV also were roughed up. Katie Couric had to cut…
Continue reading …Click here to view this media It tells you just how degraded our national discourse has become — how utterly corrupted by the Fox Propaganda Channel it has been — that two of its leading anchors can run an entire segment legitimizing a hoax video tape, even though its contents were exposed as a hoax even before they were released. And no one even so much as raises an eyebrow. That’s what happened last night on The O’Reilly Factor, when Bill O’Reilly and Fox’s John Stossel devoted an entire segment to attacking Planned Parenthood as “disgusting” for the supposed behavior revealed in another Breitbartesque attack by video hoax on another liberal institution. O’Reilly and Stossel, however, then use the affair to launch into attacking Planned Parenthood for receiving taxpayer subsidies — and that really is what they’re on about. Interestingly, Stossel uses the logic that because some people see abortion as murder, they are being forced to underwrite murder in their views — a position O’Reilly ardently adopts as well. Peculiar that neither of them apply the same logic elsewhere: Many people see killing innocent civilians in the course of a war as murder too — something our tax dollars likewise heavily underwrite. But you’ll never see an O’Reilly segment attacking taxpayer funding for the DoD. But what’s truly disgraceful that they then dismiss the overwhelming fact that Planned Parenthood had already reported these “sex traffickers” to authorities — thereby exposing the hoax in progress. Here’s their release of last week: Last week, Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) alerted federal authorities to a potential multistate sex trafficking ring. Over a five day period, visitors to Planned Parenthood health centers in six states said they were seeking information from Planned Parenthood about health services Planned Parenthood could provide to underage girls who were part of a sex trafficking ring. Subsequent to alerting U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, Planned Parenthood learned the identify of one of those involved and believes these visits are likely a hoax by opponents of legal abortion seeking to discredit Planned Parenthood, which delivers preventive health care and abortion services to three million women each year. Media Matters has the full details of the hoax. Yet, in spite of all this, when Lila Rose and Co. published the video yesterday, it was widely treated through Unsurprisingly, the wingnutosphere ran whole-hog in embracing the video as legitimate, including the fine folks at National Review, RedState and Malkin’s Hot Air. Moreover, as Ned Resnikoff at Media Matters explored in some detail, Rose’s video actually pretty clearly demonstrates the falsity of what she claims it shows: In a so-called “sting” video professional hit artist Lila Rose claims to have uncovered evidence of systemic corruption within Planned Parenthood to cover up “child sex trafficking.” Not only do Planned Parenthoods recent actions flatly contradict that claim — so does the content of the video itself. In fact, even if we were to assume that Rose’s heavily edited smear job is accurate – and there are plenty of reasons to be skeptical – the video very clearly establishes that the alleged wrongdoing is counter to Planned Parenthood policy: the employee on Rose’s tape makes it clear that the actions in question would have to be concealed from others at the organization. You can judge for yourself. Here’s the video: Click here to view this media People for the American Way also has a terrific rundown of the facts: Anti-abortion activist Lila Rose, a photogenic young activist who Religious Right leaders hope to make the new face of the anti-abortion movement, claims that the video Religious Right groups are circulating “proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that Planned Parenthood intentionally breaks state and federal laws and covers up the abuse of young girls it claims to serve.” False. In fact, far from proving a pattern of illegal activity, the Live Action project demonstrated that Planned Parenthood has strong institutional procedures in place to protect young women. When Live Action activists appeared at numerous facilities presenting themselves as seeking help with a child sex trafficking ring, Planned Parenthood wrote to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder requesting an FBI investigation. Live Action attempted its “sting” across the country; the one Planned Parenthood staffer who violated those procedures and is featured in Live Action’s video was fired. There’s a lot more on Rose’s background there as well.
Continue reading …Photo: withassociates , CC Letting People Choose?! What a Strange Concept! We’ve had some phonebook coverage recently (see the links at the end of this post) and it caused quite a reaction from you, our dear readers. It’s understandable: While phonebooks aren’t that important in the grand scheme of things, they are a very obvious and concrete (you can touch it, unlike wasted energy or CO2) example of waste for the people who get them and don’t need them. But the city of San Francis… Read the full story on TreeHugger
Continue reading …Unless you’ve been away from the Internet over the last few days, you would’ve no doubt heard about Woz’s special appearance at the Engadget Show on Sunday. Unsurprisingly, a few websites ran with some quotes that they pulled from our interview — specifically, the highlight was Woz “confirming” that the white iPhone 4 was indeed delayed due to camera issues. Well, I don’t think this is the case at all. In fact, I’m sure there are plenty of other good reasons for why Apple’s been delaying the much anticipated flavor of its flagship smartphone, but the camera just isn’t one of them. Head right past the break and all will be explained. Update: Our man Woz has just responded in the comments: I said plenty to make it clear that I know nothing of Apple’s reasons for rejecting anything ever. I told how when I got my white iPhone 4 assembled I tested the flash photos and they did indeed have problems. I spoke of testing flash photos versus non-flash ones and comparing flash photos between my white and black iPhones. I don’t recall saying that it was a ‘reason’ Apple rejected the parts although I had read that. For the last part, we were referring to 0:55 in the interview video after the break, but now that Woz has spoken, it could’ve been a joke at the time that got misinterpreted by some websites. They tend to do that with Woz. Read on! Continue reading Why the camera isn’t the culprit for the white iPhone 4′s delay (update: Woz responds) Why the camera isn’t the culprit for the white iPhone 4′s delay (update: Woz responds) originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:20:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …White House repeats Barack Obama’s call for Mubarak to begin sharing power but falls short of public demand for resignation The White House condemned the violence in Cairo as “outrageous and deplorable” as it held crisis meetings over the collapse of its attempts to manage the transition in the face of Hosni Mubarak’s defiance. The administration was trying to decide whether to publicly call for Mubarak’s immediate resignation, after Barack Obama was accused of badly misjudging the popular mood by seeming to accept the Egyptian president will remain in power during the transition. The White House spokesman, Robert Gibbs, condemned the unleashing of what, it appeared he presumed, were state-sponsored attacks on pro-democracy demonstrators, in the face of a direct call from Obama that there should be no violence. “If any of the violence is instigated by the government, it should stop immediately,” he said. The White House repeated the US president’s call for Mubarak to immediately begin sharing power but again fell short of a public demand for immediate resignation. “The time for a transition has come and that time is now,” said Gibbs. “The Egyptian people need to see change. We know that that meaningful transition must include opposition voices and parties being involved in this process as we move toward free and fair elections.” Although Obama in his speech on Tuesday demanded the transition begin immediately, he did not directly challenge Mubarak’s claim to remain in power until elections and oversee the change. However, White House officials said that while Obama was ambiguous in public about the timing of Mubarak’s departure, he was more direct in a conversation with the Egyptian president in a phone call on Tuesday night, telling him he needed to move towards an earlier departure. However, the violence may force the White House’s hand. Steve Clemons, of the New America Foundation thinktank who has been consulted by the White House on the Egypt crisis, said that Obama views the assault on the demonstrators in Cairo as a breach in relations with Mubarak. “The administration sees the social contract it thought that it had with Mubarak behind the scenes being violated,” he said. “It’s a violation of what Obama has been most strongly calling for. This raises the stakes on whether Obama escalates his calls, and whether he takes some of the things he’s been saying privately to Mubarak in to a public forum. I don’t think the president has any other options now.” Clemons said that he is pressing the White House to demand Mubarak resign immediately, because it is the only solution acceptable to the mass of Egyptians, but added that he believes the administration is still hesitant to do so. The US is also not in a rush to get to elections, as the White House finally seeks to engage with the Muslim Brotherhood while trying to give time for secular political parties to establish themselves and challenge the Islamist group at the ballot box. American analysts were united yesterday in saying that Obama had taken a risk in supporting a transition to democracy, given that Mubarak has so long been a pillar of US foreign policy. Robert Satloff, of the Washington Institute and author of the Army and Politics in Mubarak’s Egypt, also saw Obama as taking a risk but praised him for the “breathtaking change” in policy towards Egypt within a week, from backing him to calling on him to go. “Last night’s statement was nothing if not bold,” Satloff said. The imagery of Mubarak saying he would stay on for eight more months and Obama an hour later talking about transition “now” would have a powerful impact in the Middle East, Satloff said. US foreign policy United States Barack Obama Egypt Chris McGreal Ewen MacAskill guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …‘Scores of people were getting hit’ says witness injured in Egyptian demonstration I was watching a pro-Mubarak demo half a mile from Tahrir Square: about 300 to 400 people, who grew to thousands as they made their way to the square. It was a mixed crowd, with women and children chanting peacefully in support of their president and many carrying photos of him. The problems started as this crowd got to the square and ran into the demonstrators calling for Mubarak to stand down. Both sides chanted at each other; one lot pro, the other anti. Suddenly the pro-Mubarak protesters charged. A few of them shouted “Forward! Forward!” then hundreds charged towards the demonstrators. And then some of them started picking up rocks to throw. It was a barrage, not just one or two. But for a good 10 minutes the anti-Mubarak crowd resisted responding. At one point mediators within the pro-Mubarak lot tried to make them calm down, shouting “Peaceful”. Unfortunately this didn’t last long. Before you knew it, the anti-Mubarak demonstrators were throwing rocks back. The distance apart was 20 metres, and it was a constant stream of rocks. Scores of people were getting hit. I saw a young child hit in one leg so she couldn’t walk; an older woman was hit in the head and bleeding profusely. I was hit during a charge by the pro-Mubarak lot, struck on my head by a rock which knocked me to the ground. I was bleeding heavily. People took me to a makeshift medical centre run by nurses who had obviously come straight from hospital to help, where they bandaged my head. They said I needed stitches, but there were so many other injured to look after.. There must have been more than 50 injuries, some of them horrific. I saw one guy whose left eye was bleeding, men with broken arms, broken teeth where they had just been hit in the face by rocks There were no police, no security forces. The army was there, but was not intervening. The two sets of protesters were left to fight it out. Injured pro-Mubarak supporters were being taken into the Square for treatment. Some of the demonstrators tried to attack them on the way in for treatment but others were shielding and protecting them and calling for unity, saying ‘These are our brothers’. People with more serious injuries were taken out towards ambulances and driven away. The demonstrators in Tahrir Square were far bigger in numbers than the pro-Mubarak lot but as the evening went on the pro-Mubarak forces started getting stronger. The main skirmish had been going on in the Square, but there were other struggles on the roads leading in. I had been trying to leave but I couldn’t get out. When I finally left, there were Mubarak supporters carrying metal gym weights, with Molotov cocktails being thrown and sporadic gunfire. That was about 5pm UK time. They now won’t let anyone into the Square. If people aren’t being kettled by the army it’s by the protesters themselves who are trying to control things. It’s still going on right now. Mustafa Khalili is a video producer at the Guardian Egypt Middle East Protest Hosni Mubarak Mustafa Khalili guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Las Vegas casinos are readying their defenses against a group of baccarat cheaters, the Las Vegas Sun reports. The group, known as “cutters” and described by police as “extremely well-organized,” are thought to have stolen tens of millions from casinos worldwide. They take advantage of the baccarat custom in which…
Continue reading …Image credit: all images in this post are courtesy of Silverado Power. Have you noticed. as I have, that widely reported solar projects in the USA have spectacular or controversial attributes? Computer simulations of huge projects in desert settings were very big in 2010 – creating a stereotype, I’d say. Extra reporting points for protests by environmentalists, charges of government socialism, or a suitably-phallic central heat collection tower. Could the USA miss important opportunities to mainstream renewable energy by focusing on novelty aspects of big solar projects? Yes! Are there subtle public policy choi… Read the full story on TreeHugger
Continue reading …